[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @Realnickp22 Nick Peterson Nick Peterson posts on X about $soc, las, over the, soc the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XX [#](/creator/twitter::803429150/interactions)  - X Week XXXXX +353% - X Month XXXXX +147% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::803429150/posts_active)  - X Week X +200% - X Month XX +300% ### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::803429150/followers)  - X Week XXX +6.40% - X Month XXX +7.50% ### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::803429150/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::803429150/influence) --- **Social topic influence** [$soc](/topic/$soc) #66, [las](/topic/las), [over the](/topic/over-the), [soc](/topic/soc), [pacific](/topic/pacific) **Top assets mentioned** [Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC)](/topic/$soc) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::803429150/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "$SOC "If adopted after the courts hearing scheduled on October XX the ruling would have no impact on the resumption of petroleum transportation through the Las Flores Pipeline System." It should have been clear to all that the tentative ruling and decision today is over the claims made by the Coastal Commission on 4/10. The ruling is not in favor of shutting down the pipeline. It only addresses Sable's claims that the Coastal commission abused its discretion on Sable's repairs to the pipeline claiming it wasn't compliant under the 1986 CDP. News always follows the stock price. If the only" [X Link](https://x.com/Realnickp22/status/1978473280626373059) [@Realnickp22](/creator/x/Realnickp22) 2025-10-15T14:49Z XXX followers, 2255 engagements "$SOC Sable Offshore Corp. and Pacific Pipeline Company v. California Coastal Commission 10/14 Tentative Ruling Overview: The ruling tomorrow will not be about Sables work to the pipeline being unsafe. In fact the repairs Sable completed on the pipeline was so effective" [X Link](https://x.com/Realnickp22/status/1978267004600484268) [@Realnickp22](/creator/x/Realnickp22) 2025-10-15T01:09Z XXX followers, 2399 engagements "$SOC It's interesting that many people believe Sable is completely dead because they need a CDP after the tentative ruling. The Coastal Commission has always been pushing for Sable to obtain a new CDP. Sable's position was that they didn't need one due to the existing 1986 Coastal Development Permit. Pending the inevitable ruling tomorrow their hands will be tied into obtaining a new CDP and will have to proceed with the remaining claims and violations moving forward" [X Link](https://x.com/Realnickp22/status/1978322635416092846) [@Realnickp22](/creator/x/Realnickp22) 2025-10-15T04:50Z XXX followers, 2523 engagements "$SOC Judge Anderle thanked Dintzer for providing him with a written response to his tentative decision. The only to ever do so. Dintzer claimed Sable should not be punished for getting the repairs done in a small amount of time. Sable needed to get the repairs done in a certain amount of time because they were compliant with the Biologist who explained that they could not do it during rainy season or in times of nesting for certain birds. The repairs were done thoughtfully and timely with no issues. The Fire Marshall conducted the water pressure test and every line passed. That speaks volumes" [X Link](https://x.com/Realnickp22/status/1978604556066939190) [@Realnickp22](/creator/x/Realnickp22) 2025-10-15T23:31Z XXX followers, 6179 engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@Realnickp22 Nick Peterson
Nick Peterson posts on X about $soc, las, over the, soc the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XX #
- X Week XXXXX +353%
- X Month XXXXX +147%
Mentions: X #
- X Week X +200%
- X Month XX +300%
Followers: XXX #
- X Week XXX +6.40%
- X Month XXX +7.50%
CreatorRank: undefined #
Social Influence #
Social topic influence $soc #66, las, over the, soc, pacific
Top assets mentioned Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC)
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"$SOC "If adopted after the courts hearing scheduled on October XX the ruling would have no impact on the resumption of petroleum transportation through the Las Flores Pipeline System." It should have been clear to all that the tentative ruling and decision today is over the claims made by the Coastal Commission on 4/10. The ruling is not in favor of shutting down the pipeline. It only addresses Sable's claims that the Coastal commission abused its discretion on Sable's repairs to the pipeline claiming it wasn't compliant under the 1986 CDP. News always follows the stock price. If the only"
X Link @Realnickp22 2025-10-15T14:49Z XXX followers, 2255 engagements
"$SOC Sable Offshore Corp. and Pacific Pipeline Company v. California Coastal Commission 10/14 Tentative Ruling Overview: The ruling tomorrow will not be about Sables work to the pipeline being unsafe. In fact the repairs Sable completed on the pipeline was so effective"
X Link @Realnickp22 2025-10-15T01:09Z XXX followers, 2399 engagements
"$SOC It's interesting that many people believe Sable is completely dead because they need a CDP after the tentative ruling. The Coastal Commission has always been pushing for Sable to obtain a new CDP. Sable's position was that they didn't need one due to the existing 1986 Coastal Development Permit. Pending the inevitable ruling tomorrow their hands will be tied into obtaining a new CDP and will have to proceed with the remaining claims and violations moving forward"
X Link @Realnickp22 2025-10-15T04:50Z XXX followers, 2523 engagements
"$SOC Judge Anderle thanked Dintzer for providing him with a written response to his tentative decision. The only to ever do so. Dintzer claimed Sable should not be punished for getting the repairs done in a small amount of time. Sable needed to get the repairs done in a certain amount of time because they were compliant with the Biologist who explained that they could not do it during rainy season or in times of nesting for certain birds. The repairs were done thoughtfully and timely with no issues. The Fire Marshall conducted the water pressure test and every line passed. That speaks volumes"
X Link @Realnickp22 2025-10-15T23:31Z XXX followers, 6179 engagements