Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@PhilWMagness Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::989267821.png) @PhilWMagness Phil Magness

Phil Magness posts on X about tariffs, supreme court, canada, budapest the most. They currently have XXXXXXX followers and 2619 posts still getting attention that total XXXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::989267821/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::989267821/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXXXX +25%
- X Month XXXXXXXXX +16%
- X Months XXXXXXXXXX +63%
- X Year XXXXXXXXXX +108%

### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::989267821/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::989267821/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXX +91%
- X Year XXXXX +139%

### Followers: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::989267821/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::989267821/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXXXXX +0.87%
- X Month XXXXXX +1.50%
- X Months XXXXXX +12%
- X Year XXXXXX +27%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::989267821/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::989267821/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::989267821/influence)
---

**Social category influence**
[finance](/list/finance)  #1295 [countries](/list/countries)  [travel destinations](/list/travel-destinations)  [social networks](/list/social-networks)  [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  [automotive brands](/list/automotive-brands)  [stocks](/list/stocks) 

**Social topic influence**
[tariffs](/topic/tariffs) #85, [supreme court](/topic/supreme-court) #129, [canada](/topic/canada) #1074, [budapest](/topic/budapest) #311, [united states](/topic/united-states), [phil](/topic/phil) #79, [tucker carlson](/topic/tucker-carlson) #1313, [the original](/topic/the-original), [claimed](/topic/claimed) #382, [moscow](/topic/moscow) #761

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@grok](/creator/undefined) [@peterryan](/creator/undefined) [@orencass](/creator/undefined) [@philippilk](/creator/undefined) [@mattpolprof](/creator/undefined) [@bobmurphyecon](/creator/undefined) [@amercompass](/creator/undefined) [@nick65979825](/creator/undefined) [@conceptualjames](/creator/undefined) [@mrglass2025](/creator/undefined) [@samstone46](/creator/undefined) [@elonmusk](/creator/undefined) [@russnelson](/creator/undefined) [@brianpcox](/creator/undefined) [@potus](/creator/undefined) [@dkuehn](/creator/undefined) [@joefrancis505](/creator/undefined) [@aaup](/creator/undefined) [@ehplimsoll1](/creator/undefined) [@united](/creator/undefined)
### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::989267821/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Who is Regan"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1981942930899407094) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-25T04:36Z 41.4K followers, 4922 engagements


"Yet another vote against tariffs in the Senate. The House would do the same thing except Mike Johnson is gaming the rules to prevent a tariff floor vote. Which he knows he would lose"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1984030339329880534) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-30T22:51Z 41.4K followers, 4291 engagements


"It appears that the Senate is growing a spine"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1984126886122004965) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-31T05:14Z 41.4K followers, 2732 engagements


"The clear subtext of this piece is that the author really really wants to cite Ed Baptist for this claim because Baptist's book is a much better fit for it. But he knows that Baptist has severe credibility problems. So instead he does a motte-and-bailey game with Rosenthal"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1984817094198698401) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-02T02:57Z 41.4K followers, 1991 engagements


""I'm mad because the medical school's syllabus doesn't include enough alternative viewpoints from new age crystal healers""  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1984978226196672704) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-02T13:37Z 41.4K followers, 4044 engagements


"They're also quite fond of distinctly un-American European reactionaries from the last century. Instead you get this eclectic and incoherent mix of Oswald Spengler Julius Evola Caspar von Schrenck-Notzing Jean Raspail Hans Hermann Hoppe Viktor Orban and an occasional dash of Salazar Franco and Petain"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985002880982466900) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-02T15:15Z 41.5K followers, 4953 engagements


"Agree re. Strauss who is a pathway to the others for a lot of his American disciples. Scruton is way too much of a Burkean and Thatcherite for most of them though and both of those traditions have common bonds with the Reaganite branch of American conservatism that the New Right crowd rejects"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985021383550575070) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-02T16:29Z 41.4K followers, 1060 engagements


"@smallchud @kimsmithholmes How's the weather in Budapest bot"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985027727418667431) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-02T16:54Z 41.4K followers, XX engagements


"I edited the Karl Marx reader that they also teach from at the University of Austin. But go ahead and do the "You haven't read Marx" throwaway line in place of an actual argument"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985028522620928410) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-02T16:57Z 41.4K followers, 25.7K engagements


"It is literally a collection of Marx's writings in his own words. The excerpted works are closely aligned with what most Marx scholars and those who knew Marx in his own lifetime considered to be his most important works"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985062068022604225) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-02T19:10Z 41.5K followers, 5091 engagements


"@KosherRedPill MMT price controls and covid authoritarianism in Hungary were real life"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985171089258119673) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T02:24Z 41.4K followers, XX engagements


"@worst_account Henry George"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985177604882649220) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T02:49Z 41.4K followers, XXX engagements


"Hope this helps ;-)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985182721430151355) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T03:10Z 41.4K followers, 3999 engagements


"@KomandantKringe @romanclemente7 Hey @grok. What happened next"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985186262869811549) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T03:24Z 41.4K followers, XXX engagements


"Hey @grok. What happened next"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985187732763574468) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T03:30Z 41.4K followers, 3819 engagements


"@mtv732732 @TwitCensors False. See 1846 and 1857"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985380543215571074) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T16:16Z 41.4K followers, XX engagements


"@stevebartin My theory: they keep him around at Harvard so every time they get pressured to hire a conservative they can point to him and say "the last time we did that we got a guy who's obsessed with Nazi legal theorists" and then use that as an excuse to hire another leftist"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985524365774004564) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T01:47Z 41.4K followers, XX engagements


"Barrett is not buying the Trump admin arguments either. Assuming Gorsuch follows his prior jurisprudence and these comments are indicative we're looking at at least a 6-3 ruling against Trump with the X liberals + Barrett Roberts and Gorsuch going against Trump"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986096277122318632) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T15:40Z 41.7K followers, 26.9K engagements


"Quick prognostication from questions although it's hard to read between lines: Kagan Sotomayor Jackson Barrett Gorsuch and Roberts are all skeptical of Trump's tariff power claims and arguments but for different reasons. Alito is bending over backward to give Trump an expansive tariff power and using some embarrassingly bad arguments to do so. Kavanaugh is ambiguous but seemed mildly friendly to foreign policy claims Thomas was mostly quiet as he usually is but will probably end up in the Kavanaugh-to-Alito range"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986128311559336110) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T17:47Z 41.7K followers, 10.7K engagements


"My cautious prognostication: we'll get a mixture of concurring opinions that cobble together a 6-3ish coalition restriction of some sort on IEEPA. But it will be all sorts of different reasons and rationales for getting there"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986129279005188364) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T17:51Z 41.7K followers, 4555 engagements


"I listened to both. The Ontario ad only differs by excerpting key lines of the speech to fit in the X minute timeframe. All of those lines are authentic and reflect Reagan's anti-tariff beliefs. They are also public record and do not require your permission. Retract this tweet"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1981733461309403571) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-24T14:44Z 41.7K followers, 293.5K engagements


"@The4ourthBranch @ChristianHeiens You:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985182768708411474) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T03:10Z 41.7K followers, 22.1K engagements


"5. Will Alito & Thomas go hard core originalist meaning they'd have to break from Trump and rule against tariffs Or will they try to invent a way out for why the judicial philosophy they built their entire career on somehow doesn't apply here"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985766118632345854) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1905 engagements


"6. Will any of the justices ask tough questions about the specific "emergencies" Trump has claimed up to and including being mad at the Brazilian court system and getting upset at a TV commercial from Canada"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985766120389791951) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1923 engagements


"7. Will the DOJ lawyers press ahead on Trump's crazy claims that a ruling against him will create another Great Depression Or will they try to bury them and focus instead on legal technicalities"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985766122033913884) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1178 engagements


"John Roberts is one of many justices whose credibility is on the line today with the tariff case"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986077925641433140) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T14:27Z 41.7K followers, 4120 engagements


"Tariff case live-tweet thread. 🧵🧵🧵 We have arguments today in the Supreme Court on the VOS Selections + Learning Resources Inc. challenges to Trump's IEEPA tariffs. Check here starting at XX am eastern for my running commentary"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986080004262809773) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T14:35Z 41.7K followers, 62.5K engagements


"Wow. Trump's DOJ just openly admitted that its interpretation of IEEPA could be used by a future president to declare a "climate change" emergency and impose XX% tariffs on energy"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986101357854486859) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T16:00Z 41.7K followers, 73K engagements


"And there we have it from Sotomayor: Trump put a XX% tax on Canada because he was mad at a TV ad. That's not in keeping with any reasonable statutory construct and it's certainly not in keeping with the letter of the US Constitution"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986126126486265966) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T17:39Z 41.7K followers, 4749 engagements


"Several others responded most notably Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story arguing that protectionist tariffs were encompassed and sanctioned under the commerce clause's regulatory powers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986153915205792086) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements


"If we follow James Madison though along with the ruling in JW Hampton v. United States (1928) no such parsing is permitted. That means Trump's tariffs must meet both the tax clause and the commerce clause"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986153926559678706) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, 1841 engagements


"I know for a fact that @uaustinorg assigns Karl Marx in classes because I edited the reader that they use. You're just grousing because this particular class doesn't feature the coterie of low-grade "neoliberalism" conspiracy tracts found in most college courses on capitalism"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1983901532966814172) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-30T14:19Z 41.7K followers, 17.1K engagements


"The perfect piece to finish off the Lincoln bathroom remodel"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1984478118812479701) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-01T04:30Z 41.7K followers, 2413 engagements


"The figures I noted (de Maistre Carlyle Schmitt) are a coterie of cranks & oddballs who pushed monarchism fascism & other authoritarian ideologies. I describe them as un-American because well America was founded as a rejection of monarchy & fought a war to destroy fascism"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985149903660515490) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T00:59Z 41.7K followers, 7206 engagements


"As opposed to this guy's "game plan""  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985155127909470306) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T01:20Z 41.5K followers, 20K engagements


"JW Hampton v. United States (1928) creates a bit of an obstacle for the Trump admin's claims that tariffs are a regulation rather than a tax as an attempt to get greater leeway under the commerce clause & Article II foreign policy powers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985374466663432327) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T15:52Z 41.7K followers, 5648 engagements


"@jayphoward @grok Hey @grok. Compare this National Review editorial to Michael Mann's past social media commentary on the lawsuit. Which of the two acted in a less mature and more childish manner"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985480241415168477) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T22:52Z 41.7K followers, XX engagements


"Second contender for the scariest costume this Halloween:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1984367151646474243) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-31T21:09Z 41.7K followers, 3240 engagements


""America's survival as a country depends on this magical tariff power that I invented for myself in April 2025 and that no other president before me had ever claimed or used" .is not the slam dunk argument that Trump imagines it to be"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985418373593702416) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T18:46Z 41.7K followers, 13.2K engagements


"The tariff case later this week is one of the most important decisions in a half century or more. It is not an exaggeration to state that what remains of the constitution as a limiting document on government power hangs by a thread"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985467370828157236) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T22:01Z 41.7K followers, 32.2K engagements


"It's time for SCOTUS to put an end to this madness"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985534402567483665) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T02:27Z 41.7K followers, 12.5K engagements


"3. Will Kagan clarify her position on when the nondelegation doctrine applies by suggesting that tariffs fit that constitutional test whereas other cases where she rejected it did not"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985766115255992798) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1495 engagements


""America's life or death depends on this fake new tariff power that I invented for myself out of thin air in April 2025" .is not the slam dunk argument that Trump imagines it to be"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985861202786840957) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T00:06Z 41.7K followers, 13.9K engagements


"Gorsuch: constitution says Congress gets to regulate commerce. Katyal: our position is not that regulate could never mean tax or tariffs. Interesting exchange on language of regulation"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986115823782555914) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T16:58Z 41.7K followers, 3601 engagements


"This exchange is once again showing the case will probably turn on "tariffs as revenue" vs. "tariffs as regulation" The case law is very clear that they are both. So is James Madison"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986116453888893299) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T17:00Z 41.7K followers, 3282 engagements


"Credit to the liberal justices here in bringing the case back to the fundamental issue of whether the president or congress controls the taxing power"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986125765336031338) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T17:37Z 41.7K followers, 3559 engagements


"James Madison was still alive at that point and weighed in. His writings are often (mis)cited as support for the regulatory power. But he actually split the baby and argued that tariffs simultaneously executed both the tax and regulatory powers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986153917244448999) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements


"Was there a different hearing in some other universe that you attended Cause the one I listened to showed Sauer getting ripped to shreds as he tried to claim that tariffs are not taxes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986209069669970241) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T23:08Z 41.7K followers, 8273 engagements


"Most Fuentes/groyper accounts are just sockpuppets that boost each other. Usually they only have a couple hundred (of the same) followers all anon accounts that joined X in the last year. Block them & their top followers and it instantly cleans the trash off your feed"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1983924072883835065) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-30T15:48Z 41.7K followers, 13K engagements


"This is a terrible argument. The Supreme Court was our most effective tool to halt Biden's excesses on multiple major cases: student loan forgiveness EPA overreach Chevron doctrine and even lawfare prosecutions. They did so on originalist grounds that Vance would bulldoze"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1983974275464757625) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-30T19:08Z 41.7K followers, 38.7K engagements


"Scariest Halloween costume I've seen yet"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1984334872966508756) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-31T19:01Z 41.7K followers, 42.7K engagements


"Marxist Academics spend years using Marx as their framework for everything. But describe them Marxists & it's "McCarthyism" and a "slur." Postliberals do the same with Schmitt and even overlay it with an occasional nod to Franco. But describe them as fascists & it's a "slur.""  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985357322999288282) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T14:44Z 41.7K followers, 2667 engagements


"@BigRichard46 I have no idea what you're babbling about. You appear to be mad that Hitler lost WWII though so I'm blocking you for polluting this thread with Nazi garbage"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985512602764451975) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T01:01Z 41.7K followers, XX engagements


"@ThomasDHowes The Venn Diagram between Schmittians and "people who are extremely concerned about ensuring the right doesn't repudiate Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes" is a single circle"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985522036861505862) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T01:38Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements


"@philipaklein If the intention of the original X post was to appeal to wayward young men in Fuentes's orbit and draw them out of it. .why didn't it say anything about that topic"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985544228340895950) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T03:06Z 41.7K followers, 3518 engagements


"@MaxNordau I'm skeptical. Vance owes his Senate election and the VP nod to Tucker Carlson lobbying for both. They've been close for many years and all the Vance proteges in the DC policy shops are firmly on Team Tucker in the latest imbroglio"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985546618779947242) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T03:16Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements


"@philipaklein (Context: the original X post that started this mess was a botched attempt to quell a rumor that Heritage was cutting ties with Tucker Carlson after they removed mentions of Carlson from one of their donation pages)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985547621721637267) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T03:20Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements


"@allowed2speak You have no clue what you're talking about. The original supreme court found that the enumerated indirect forms of taxation were indeed taxes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985891936255856820) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T02:08Z 41.7K followers, XX engagements


"It's midnight on the east coast in the US. That means the Tarrif-Bots in Moscow Budapest and Karachi are out in force posting incoherent talking points in defense of Trump's crazy spite-tariff on Canada over a TV ad"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1982296430728327502) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-26T04:01Z 41.7K followers, 5995 engagements


"It's midnight on the east coast in the US. That means the Tarrif-Bots in Moscow Budapest and Karachi are out in force posting incoherent talking points in defense of Trump's crazy spite-tariff on Canada over a TV ad. (this one is spamming the same post on dozens of threads)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1982306519623549387) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-26T04:41Z 41.7K followers, 3598 engagements


"Tonight's Budapest Bot Bonanza consists of fake accounts that claim to be Canadian and yet are thrilled Trump is putting tariffs on Canada. This is one of them:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1982325718177771720) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-10-26T05:57Z 41.7K followers, 2218 engagements


"Tariffs are Trump's worst-polling issue. The Gaza peace deal (assuming it holds) is his best-polling issue. Somehow the Postliberals have convinced themselves that the key to "winning" is to plow full steam ahead on tariffs while also courting anti-semitic bigots"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985122062348796327) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-02T23:09Z 41.7K followers, 37.6K engagements


"Kagan has acknowledged that nondelegation is a constitutional principle while arguing that previous challenges do not meet its bar. So the argument here will be to convince her that tariffs do fall under nondelegation. I noticed several of the briefs strategically quoted her on that point"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985371260084216121) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T15:39Z 41.7K followers, 2479 engagements


"2. Will Roberts accept a "tariffs are not taxes they're regulations" argument from Trump in light of his (in)famous Obamacare tax argument from Sebelius"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985766112676757753) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1705 engagements


"Just gonna point out that Trump's attorney spent the last X hours adamantly insisting to the Supreme Court that tariffs are not taxes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986135621556183058) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T18:16Z 41.7K followers, 17.5K engagements


"In a roundabout way Trump's team has inadvertently resurrected Calhoun's argument. They claim that their tariff is not a tax but strictly a regulation with "incidental" revenue generation. As such they claim that Congress authorized it under IEEPA outside of the tax clause"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986153924513177967) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements


"For those interested I laid out the history of this debate in a 2008 article here. I never dreamed at the time that this issue would be before the Supreme Court in 2025"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986153928455852485) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, 1813 engagements


"So.why weren't we in a worldwide depression X months ago before you invented the IEEPA tariff power out of thin air"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986274613274550407) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-06T03:29Z 41.7K followers, 13.1K engagements


"I'd like to do a followup volume called "Postliberal Abstracts" but it turns out the postliberals don't publish anything in real journals"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986308615334994125) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-06T05:44Z 41.7K followers, 1451 engagements


"This post contains a pinned answer to all of the inane & repetitive pro-tariff talking points on this site so that I don't have to waste any more time responding to them. You will find the answers below and if you continue pestering me anyway with the same inane talking points you will find yourself blocked and removed from my threads. Thank you for your attention to this matter. X. "But these other countries are charging higher tariffs on us" No. They objectively are not. The US ranks worse than the EU UK Canada Australia and most other developed countries on almost every single measure and"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1963661277655638244) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-09-04T17:51Z 41.7K followers, 122.7K engagements


"To add to this: there are numerous antisemitic and Nazi-adjacent "influencers" on this site who embrace NETTR precisely because it gives them cover to be Nazis"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985067239276675310) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-02T19:31Z 41.7K followers, 25.7K engagements


"Note that Hampton is also the case that created the nondelegation "intelligible principle" test that's before SCOTUS in the tariff case later this week. But it's main holding was also an affirmation that even regulatory tariffs are also taxes & bound by the tax clause"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985374469418782800) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-03T15:52Z 41.7K followers, 1233 engagements


"It was not until XXX years later that the Supreme Court formally addressed and clarified this matter. They essentially landed in the same place as Madison ruling that tariffs are both in JW Hampton v. United States (1928)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986153919869788662) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements


"It's curious that the "Heritage American" crowd draws its philosophical cues from distinctly un-American traditions of European right wing authoritarian crankery: Joseph de Maistre Thomas Carlyle obscure theocratic branches of 1920s fascism and above all Carl Schmitt"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985001233468281269) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-02T15:09Z 41.7K followers, 64K engagements


"4. Will they dig into what the "intelligible principle" test from JW Hampton v. US means specifically for tariffs considering that this landmark nondelegation case was also the last major tariff case before SCOTUS"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985766116958802112) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1354 engagements


"The Supreme Court could give them an offramp for ending the tariff madness. The smart thing for Republicans to do would be to seize that opportunity and close the door on the failed tariff experiment"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1985917080374558871) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T03:48Z 41.7K followers, 22.7K engagements


"A moment of levity - Alito asks Katyal (Obama's former SG) if he ever imagined he'd be the guy to argue for reviving the nondelegation doctrine"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986113666442281027) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T16:49Z 41.7K followers, 4044 engagements


"This became John C. Calhoun's position in the Nullification Crisis. Since the 1828 Tariff of Abominations gave up revenue to accomplish regulatory restrictions on commerce Calhoun held that it was unconstitutional"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986153913607770299) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements


"Those who cite James Madison's Cabell letter from 1828 to justify tariffs on "regulation of commerce" grounds seldom read its final line. Madison intended for this power to be exercised by Congress alone which was responsible to its constituents not some presidential decree"  
[X Link](https://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/1986407941797229044) [@PhilWMagness](/creator/x/PhilWMagness) 2025-11-06T12:18Z 41.7K followers, 1609 engagements

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@PhilWMagness Avatar @PhilWMagness Phil Magness

Phil Magness posts on X about tariffs, supreme court, canada, budapest the most. They currently have XXXXXXX followers and 2619 posts still getting attention that total XXXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

  • X Week XXXXXXX +25%
  • X Month XXXXXXXXX +16%
  • X Months XXXXXXXXXX +63%
  • X Year XXXXXXXXXX +108%

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

  • X Week XX -XX%
  • X Month XXX -XX%
  • X Months XXXXX +91%
  • X Year XXXXX +139%

Followers: XXXXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

  • X Week XXXXXX +0.87%
  • X Month XXXXXX +1.50%
  • X Months XXXXXX +12%
  • X Year XXXXXX +27%

CreatorRank: XXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #


Social category influence finance #1295 countries travel destinations social networks technology brands automotive brands stocks

Social topic influence tariffs #85, supreme court #129, canada #1074, budapest #311, united states, phil #79, tucker carlson #1313, the original, claimed #382, moscow #761

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @grok @peterryan @orencass @philippilk @mattpolprof @bobmurphyecon @amercompass @nick65979825 @conceptualjames @mrglass2025 @samstone46 @elonmusk @russnelson @brianpcox @potus @dkuehn @joefrancis505 @aaup @ehplimsoll1 @united

Top Social Posts #


Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Who is Regan"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-25T04:36Z 41.4K followers, 4922 engagements

"Yet another vote against tariffs in the Senate. The House would do the same thing except Mike Johnson is gaming the rules to prevent a tariff floor vote. Which he knows he would lose"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-30T22:51Z 41.4K followers, 4291 engagements

"It appears that the Senate is growing a spine"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-31T05:14Z 41.4K followers, 2732 engagements

"The clear subtext of this piece is that the author really really wants to cite Ed Baptist for this claim because Baptist's book is a much better fit for it. But he knows that Baptist has severe credibility problems. So instead he does a motte-and-bailey game with Rosenthal"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-02T02:57Z 41.4K followers, 1991 engagements

""I'm mad because the medical school's syllabus doesn't include enough alternative viewpoints from new age crystal healers""
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-02T13:37Z 41.4K followers, 4044 engagements

"They're also quite fond of distinctly un-American European reactionaries from the last century. Instead you get this eclectic and incoherent mix of Oswald Spengler Julius Evola Caspar von Schrenck-Notzing Jean Raspail Hans Hermann Hoppe Viktor Orban and an occasional dash of Salazar Franco and Petain"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-02T15:15Z 41.5K followers, 4953 engagements

"Agree re. Strauss who is a pathway to the others for a lot of his American disciples. Scruton is way too much of a Burkean and Thatcherite for most of them though and both of those traditions have common bonds with the Reaganite branch of American conservatism that the New Right crowd rejects"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-02T16:29Z 41.4K followers, 1060 engagements

"@smallchud @kimsmithholmes How's the weather in Budapest bot"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-02T16:54Z 41.4K followers, XX engagements

"I edited the Karl Marx reader that they also teach from at the University of Austin. But go ahead and do the "You haven't read Marx" throwaway line in place of an actual argument"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-02T16:57Z 41.4K followers, 25.7K engagements

"It is literally a collection of Marx's writings in his own words. The excerpted works are closely aligned with what most Marx scholars and those who knew Marx in his own lifetime considered to be his most important works"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-02T19:10Z 41.5K followers, 5091 engagements

"@KosherRedPill MMT price controls and covid authoritarianism in Hungary were real life"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T02:24Z 41.4K followers, XX engagements

"@worst_account Henry George"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T02:49Z 41.4K followers, XXX engagements

"Hope this helps ;-)"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T03:10Z 41.4K followers, 3999 engagements

"@KomandantKringe @romanclemente7 Hey @grok. What happened next"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T03:24Z 41.4K followers, XXX engagements

"Hey @grok. What happened next"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T03:30Z 41.4K followers, 3819 engagements

"@mtv732732 @TwitCensors False. See 1846 and 1857"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T16:16Z 41.4K followers, XX engagements

"@stevebartin My theory: they keep him around at Harvard so every time they get pressured to hire a conservative they can point to him and say "the last time we did that we got a guy who's obsessed with Nazi legal theorists" and then use that as an excuse to hire another leftist"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T01:47Z 41.4K followers, XX engagements

"Barrett is not buying the Trump admin arguments either. Assuming Gorsuch follows his prior jurisprudence and these comments are indicative we're looking at at least a 6-3 ruling against Trump with the X liberals + Barrett Roberts and Gorsuch going against Trump"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T15:40Z 41.7K followers, 26.9K engagements

"Quick prognostication from questions although it's hard to read between lines: Kagan Sotomayor Jackson Barrett Gorsuch and Roberts are all skeptical of Trump's tariff power claims and arguments but for different reasons. Alito is bending over backward to give Trump an expansive tariff power and using some embarrassingly bad arguments to do so. Kavanaugh is ambiguous but seemed mildly friendly to foreign policy claims Thomas was mostly quiet as he usually is but will probably end up in the Kavanaugh-to-Alito range"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T17:47Z 41.7K followers, 10.7K engagements

"My cautious prognostication: we'll get a mixture of concurring opinions that cobble together a 6-3ish coalition restriction of some sort on IEEPA. But it will be all sorts of different reasons and rationales for getting there"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T17:51Z 41.7K followers, 4555 engagements

"I listened to both. The Ontario ad only differs by excerpting key lines of the speech to fit in the X minute timeframe. All of those lines are authentic and reflect Reagan's anti-tariff beliefs. They are also public record and do not require your permission. Retract this tweet"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-24T14:44Z 41.7K followers, 293.5K engagements

"@The4ourthBranch @ChristianHeiens You:"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T03:10Z 41.7K followers, 22.1K engagements

"5. Will Alito & Thomas go hard core originalist meaning they'd have to break from Trump and rule against tariffs Or will they try to invent a way out for why the judicial philosophy they built their entire career on somehow doesn't apply here"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1905 engagements

"6. Will any of the justices ask tough questions about the specific "emergencies" Trump has claimed up to and including being mad at the Brazilian court system and getting upset at a TV commercial from Canada"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1923 engagements

"7. Will the DOJ lawyers press ahead on Trump's crazy claims that a ruling against him will create another Great Depression Or will they try to bury them and focus instead on legal technicalities"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1178 engagements

"John Roberts is one of many justices whose credibility is on the line today with the tariff case"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T14:27Z 41.7K followers, 4120 engagements

"Tariff case live-tweet thread. 🧵🧵🧵 We have arguments today in the Supreme Court on the VOS Selections + Learning Resources Inc. challenges to Trump's IEEPA tariffs. Check here starting at XX am eastern for my running commentary"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T14:35Z 41.7K followers, 62.5K engagements

"Wow. Trump's DOJ just openly admitted that its interpretation of IEEPA could be used by a future president to declare a "climate change" emergency and impose XX% tariffs on energy"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T16:00Z 41.7K followers, 73K engagements

"And there we have it from Sotomayor: Trump put a XX% tax on Canada because he was mad at a TV ad. That's not in keeping with any reasonable statutory construct and it's certainly not in keeping with the letter of the US Constitution"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T17:39Z 41.7K followers, 4749 engagements

"Several others responded most notably Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story arguing that protectionist tariffs were encompassed and sanctioned under the commerce clause's regulatory powers"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements

"If we follow James Madison though along with the ruling in JW Hampton v. United States (1928) no such parsing is permitted. That means Trump's tariffs must meet both the tax clause and the commerce clause"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, 1841 engagements

"I know for a fact that @uaustinorg assigns Karl Marx in classes because I edited the reader that they use. You're just grousing because this particular class doesn't feature the coterie of low-grade "neoliberalism" conspiracy tracts found in most college courses on capitalism"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-30T14:19Z 41.7K followers, 17.1K engagements

"The perfect piece to finish off the Lincoln bathroom remodel"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-01T04:30Z 41.7K followers, 2413 engagements

"The figures I noted (de Maistre Carlyle Schmitt) are a coterie of cranks & oddballs who pushed monarchism fascism & other authoritarian ideologies. I describe them as un-American because well America was founded as a rejection of monarchy & fought a war to destroy fascism"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T00:59Z 41.7K followers, 7206 engagements

"As opposed to this guy's "game plan""
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T01:20Z 41.5K followers, 20K engagements

"JW Hampton v. United States (1928) creates a bit of an obstacle for the Trump admin's claims that tariffs are a regulation rather than a tax as an attempt to get greater leeway under the commerce clause & Article II foreign policy powers"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T15:52Z 41.7K followers, 5648 engagements

"@jayphoward @grok Hey @grok. Compare this National Review editorial to Michael Mann's past social media commentary on the lawsuit. Which of the two acted in a less mature and more childish manner"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T22:52Z 41.7K followers, XX engagements

"Second contender for the scariest costume this Halloween:"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-31T21:09Z 41.7K followers, 3240 engagements

""America's survival as a country depends on this magical tariff power that I invented for myself in April 2025 and that no other president before me had ever claimed or used" .is not the slam dunk argument that Trump imagines it to be"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T18:46Z 41.7K followers, 13.2K engagements

"The tariff case later this week is one of the most important decisions in a half century or more. It is not an exaggeration to state that what remains of the constitution as a limiting document on government power hangs by a thread"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T22:01Z 41.7K followers, 32.2K engagements

"It's time for SCOTUS to put an end to this madness"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T02:27Z 41.7K followers, 12.5K engagements

"3. Will Kagan clarify her position on when the nondelegation doctrine applies by suggesting that tariffs fit that constitutional test whereas other cases where she rejected it did not"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1495 engagements

""America's life or death depends on this fake new tariff power that I invented for myself out of thin air in April 2025" .is not the slam dunk argument that Trump imagines it to be"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T00:06Z 41.7K followers, 13.9K engagements

"Gorsuch: constitution says Congress gets to regulate commerce. Katyal: our position is not that regulate could never mean tax or tariffs. Interesting exchange on language of regulation"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T16:58Z 41.7K followers, 3601 engagements

"This exchange is once again showing the case will probably turn on "tariffs as revenue" vs. "tariffs as regulation" The case law is very clear that they are both. So is James Madison"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T17:00Z 41.7K followers, 3282 engagements

"Credit to the liberal justices here in bringing the case back to the fundamental issue of whether the president or congress controls the taxing power"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T17:37Z 41.7K followers, 3559 engagements

"James Madison was still alive at that point and weighed in. His writings are often (mis)cited as support for the regulatory power. But he actually split the baby and argued that tariffs simultaneously executed both the tax and regulatory powers"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements

"Was there a different hearing in some other universe that you attended Cause the one I listened to showed Sauer getting ripped to shreds as he tried to claim that tariffs are not taxes"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T23:08Z 41.7K followers, 8273 engagements

"Most Fuentes/groyper accounts are just sockpuppets that boost each other. Usually they only have a couple hundred (of the same) followers all anon accounts that joined X in the last year. Block them & their top followers and it instantly cleans the trash off your feed"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-30T15:48Z 41.7K followers, 13K engagements

"This is a terrible argument. The Supreme Court was our most effective tool to halt Biden's excesses on multiple major cases: student loan forgiveness EPA overreach Chevron doctrine and even lawfare prosecutions. They did so on originalist grounds that Vance would bulldoze"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-30T19:08Z 41.7K followers, 38.7K engagements

"Scariest Halloween costume I've seen yet"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-31T19:01Z 41.7K followers, 42.7K engagements

"Marxist Academics spend years using Marx as their framework for everything. But describe them Marxists & it's "McCarthyism" and a "slur." Postliberals do the same with Schmitt and even overlay it with an occasional nod to Franco. But describe them as fascists & it's a "slur.""
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T14:44Z 41.7K followers, 2667 engagements

"@BigRichard46 I have no idea what you're babbling about. You appear to be mad that Hitler lost WWII though so I'm blocking you for polluting this thread with Nazi garbage"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T01:01Z 41.7K followers, XX engagements

"@ThomasDHowes The Venn Diagram between Schmittians and "people who are extremely concerned about ensuring the right doesn't repudiate Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes" is a single circle"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T01:38Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements

"@philipaklein If the intention of the original X post was to appeal to wayward young men in Fuentes's orbit and draw them out of it. .why didn't it say anything about that topic"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T03:06Z 41.7K followers, 3518 engagements

"@MaxNordau I'm skeptical. Vance owes his Senate election and the VP nod to Tucker Carlson lobbying for both. They've been close for many years and all the Vance proteges in the DC policy shops are firmly on Team Tucker in the latest imbroglio"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T03:16Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements

"@philipaklein (Context: the original X post that started this mess was a botched attempt to quell a rumor that Heritage was cutting ties with Tucker Carlson after they removed mentions of Carlson from one of their donation pages)"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T03:20Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements

"@allowed2speak You have no clue what you're talking about. The original supreme court found that the enumerated indirect forms of taxation were indeed taxes"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T02:08Z 41.7K followers, XX engagements

"It's midnight on the east coast in the US. That means the Tarrif-Bots in Moscow Budapest and Karachi are out in force posting incoherent talking points in defense of Trump's crazy spite-tariff on Canada over a TV ad"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-26T04:01Z 41.7K followers, 5995 engagements

"It's midnight on the east coast in the US. That means the Tarrif-Bots in Moscow Budapest and Karachi are out in force posting incoherent talking points in defense of Trump's crazy spite-tariff on Canada over a TV ad. (this one is spamming the same post on dozens of threads)"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-26T04:41Z 41.7K followers, 3598 engagements

"Tonight's Budapest Bot Bonanza consists of fake accounts that claim to be Canadian and yet are thrilled Trump is putting tariffs on Canada. This is one of them:"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-10-26T05:57Z 41.7K followers, 2218 engagements

"Tariffs are Trump's worst-polling issue. The Gaza peace deal (assuming it holds) is his best-polling issue. Somehow the Postliberals have convinced themselves that the key to "winning" is to plow full steam ahead on tariffs while also courting anti-semitic bigots"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-02T23:09Z 41.7K followers, 37.6K engagements

"Kagan has acknowledged that nondelegation is a constitutional principle while arguing that previous challenges do not meet its bar. So the argument here will be to convince her that tariffs do fall under nondelegation. I noticed several of the briefs strategically quoted her on that point"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T15:39Z 41.7K followers, 2479 engagements

"2. Will Roberts accept a "tariffs are not taxes they're regulations" argument from Trump in light of his (in)famous Obamacare tax argument from Sebelius"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1705 engagements

"Just gonna point out that Trump's attorney spent the last X hours adamantly insisting to the Supreme Court that tariffs are not taxes"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T18:16Z 41.7K followers, 17.5K engagements

"In a roundabout way Trump's team has inadvertently resurrected Calhoun's argument. They claim that their tariff is not a tax but strictly a regulation with "incidental" revenue generation. As such they claim that Congress authorized it under IEEPA outside of the tax clause"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements

"For those interested I laid out the history of this debate in a 2008 article here. I never dreamed at the time that this issue would be before the Supreme Court in 2025"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, 1813 engagements

"So.why weren't we in a worldwide depression X months ago before you invented the IEEPA tariff power out of thin air"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-06T03:29Z 41.7K followers, 13.1K engagements

"I'd like to do a followup volume called "Postliberal Abstracts" but it turns out the postliberals don't publish anything in real journals"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-06T05:44Z 41.7K followers, 1451 engagements

"This post contains a pinned answer to all of the inane & repetitive pro-tariff talking points on this site so that I don't have to waste any more time responding to them. You will find the answers below and if you continue pestering me anyway with the same inane talking points you will find yourself blocked and removed from my threads. Thank you for your attention to this matter. X. "But these other countries are charging higher tariffs on us" No. They objectively are not. The US ranks worse than the EU UK Canada Australia and most other developed countries on almost every single measure and"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-09-04T17:51Z 41.7K followers, 122.7K engagements

"To add to this: there are numerous antisemitic and Nazi-adjacent "influencers" on this site who embrace NETTR precisely because it gives them cover to be Nazis"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-02T19:31Z 41.7K followers, 25.7K engagements

"Note that Hampton is also the case that created the nondelegation "intelligible principle" test that's before SCOTUS in the tariff case later this week. But it's main holding was also an affirmation that even regulatory tariffs are also taxes & bound by the tax clause"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-03T15:52Z 41.7K followers, 1233 engagements

"It was not until XXX years later that the Supreme Court formally addressed and clarified this matter. They essentially landed in the same place as Madison ruling that tariffs are both in JW Hampton v. United States (1928)"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements

"It's curious that the "Heritage American" crowd draws its philosophical cues from distinctly un-American traditions of European right wing authoritarian crankery: Joseph de Maistre Thomas Carlyle obscure theocratic branches of 1920s fascism and above all Carl Schmitt"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-02T15:09Z 41.7K followers, 64K engagements

"4. Will they dig into what the "intelligible principle" test from JW Hampton v. US means specifically for tariffs considering that this landmark nondelegation case was also the last major tariff case before SCOTUS"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-04T17:48Z 41.7K followers, 1354 engagements

"The Supreme Court could give them an offramp for ending the tariff madness. The smart thing for Republicans to do would be to seize that opportunity and close the door on the failed tariff experiment"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T03:48Z 41.7K followers, 22.7K engagements

"A moment of levity - Alito asks Katyal (Obama's former SG) if he ever imagined he'd be the guy to argue for reviving the nondelegation doctrine"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T16:49Z 41.7K followers, 4044 engagements

"This became John C. Calhoun's position in the Nullification Crisis. Since the 1828 Tariff of Abominations gave up revenue to accomplish regulatory restrictions on commerce Calhoun held that it was unconstitutional"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-05T19:29Z 41.7K followers, XXX engagements

"Those who cite James Madison's Cabell letter from 1828 to justify tariffs on "regulation of commerce" grounds seldom read its final line. Madison intended for this power to be exercised by Congress alone which was responsible to its constituents not some presidential decree"
X Link @PhilWMagness 2025-11-06T12:18Z 41.7K followers, 1609 engagements

@PhilWMagness
/creator/twitter::PhilWMagness