[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @NeilRingdahl Neil Ringdahl Neil Ringdahl posts on X about market cap, $2553m, $3320oz, $nem the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1113074072638943232/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX +504% - X Month XXXXXX -XXXX% - X Months XXXXXXX +408% - X Year XXXXXXX -XX% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1113074072638943232/posts_active)  ### Followers: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1113074072638943232/followers)  - X Week XXXXXX +0.31% - X Month XXXXXX +2.10% - X Months XXXXXX +12% - X Year XXXXXX +19% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1113074072638943232/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1113074072638943232/influence) --- **Social category influence** [stocks](/list/stocks) [finance](/list/finance) **Social topic influence** [market cap](/topic/market-cap) #317, [$2553m](/topic/$2553m) #1, [$3320oz](/topic/$3320oz) #1, [$nem](/topic/$nem), [$372m](/topic/$372m), [debt](/topic/debt), [$2898oz](/topic/$2898oz), [$nems](/topic/$nems), [fog](/topic/fog), [bla](/topic/bla) **Top assets mentioned** [Newmont Corporation (NEM)](/topic/$nem) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1113074072638943232/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "$NEM despite a smallish safety setback did predictably better in Q2 thanks to a realized gold price of $3320/oz & despite a X% drop in gold production AISC was also X% down. My calculated operating contribution was up XX% to $2553M with a corresponding XX% increase in SP since 25th June. They're also buying back approximately X% of the company stock after reducing debt $372M. So not bad. 🤔"  [@NeilRingdahl](/creator/x/NeilRingdahl) on [X](/post/tweet/1948767940809007566) 2025-07-25 15:30:58 UTC 19.3K followers, 5441 engagements "I forgot to mention $NEM's realized price of gold was only up XXXX% from quarter to quarter from $2944 to 3320/oz. That leverages a XX% lift in operating contribution using their realized prices.😃 (Sticklers pls note: I used my industry average Q1 realized price of gold of $2898/oz) to calc. a XX% oper. margin increase below😬)"  [@NeilRingdahl](/creator/x/NeilRingdahl) on [X](/post/tweet/1948771191688253718) 2025-07-25 15:43:53 UTC 19.3K followers, 1966 engagements "Proving once again the major miners are not the safest despite all the systems and bla bla bla. This time its Newmont. How the heck can these people not have a second escape route for a FOG incident Its UG safety XXX 🙄"  [@NeilRingdahl](/creator/x/NeilRingdahl) on [X](/post/tweet/1948505562011857037) 2025-07-24 22:08:22 UTC 19.3K followers, 3482 engagements "Following on from my poll👇 I did some comparisons of the top XX gold producers with combined market cap of $XXX billion and came up with some interesting results that I hope you'll find useful. Figure 1: a) Considers Q1 2025 on Q4 2024 production AISC & Operating Contribution or my calculation of :- (Average realized gold price - AISC) x production. Note this number is theoretically how much cash each companies mines produce before corporate O/H's & other fancy nasty financial fu things like changes in WC. Its not bottom line but if the bottom line is markedly different it would be worth"  [@NeilRingdahl](/creator/x/NeilRingdahl) on [X](/post/tweet/1941616961667887482) 2025-07-05 21:55:31 UTC 19.3K followers, 55.1K engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@NeilRingdahl Neil Ringdahl
Neil Ringdahl posts on X about market cap, $2553m, $3320oz, $nem the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +504%
- X Month XXXXXX -XXXX%
- X Months XXXXXXX +408%
- X Year XXXXXXX -XX%
Mentions: X #
Followers: XXXXXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +0.31%
- X Month XXXXXX +2.10%
- X Months XXXXXX +12%
- X Year XXXXXX +19%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence #
Social category influence stocks finance
Social topic influence market cap #317, $2553m #1, $3320oz #1, $nem, $372m, debt, $2898oz, $nems, fog, bla
Top assets mentioned Newmont Corporation (NEM)
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"$NEM despite a smallish safety setback did predictably better in Q2 thanks to a realized gold price of $3320/oz & despite a X% drop in gold production AISC was also X% down. My calculated operating contribution was up XX% to $2553M with a corresponding XX% increase in SP since 25th June. They're also buying back approximately X% of the company stock after reducing debt $372M. So not bad. 🤔"
@NeilRingdahl on X 2025-07-25 15:30:58 UTC 19.3K followers, 5441 engagements
"I forgot to mention $NEM's realized price of gold was only up XXXX% from quarter to quarter from $2944 to 3320/oz. That leverages a XX% lift in operating contribution using their realized prices.😃 (Sticklers pls note: I used my industry average Q1 realized price of gold of $2898/oz) to calc. a XX% oper. margin increase below😬)" @NeilRingdahl on X 2025-07-25 15:43:53 UTC 19.3K followers, 1966 engagements
"Proving once again the major miners are not the safest despite all the systems and bla bla bla. This time its Newmont. How the heck can these people not have a second escape route for a FOG incident Its UG safety XXX 🙄" @NeilRingdahl on X 2025-07-24 22:08:22 UTC 19.3K followers, 3482 engagements
"Following on from my poll👇 I did some comparisons of the top XX gold producers with combined market cap of $XXX billion and came up with some interesting results that I hope you'll find useful. Figure 1: a) Considers Q1 2025 on Q4 2024 production AISC & Operating Contribution or my calculation of :- (Average realized gold price - AISC) x production. Note this number is theoretically how much cash each companies mines produce before corporate O/H's & other fancy nasty financial fu things like changes in WC. Its not bottom line but if the bottom line is markedly different it would be worth" @NeilRingdahl on X 2025-07-05 21:55:31 UTC 19.3K followers, 55.1K engagements