[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @LanderPeterjohn Lander PeterJohn Lander PeterJohn posts on X about china, tariffs, trade war, temu the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 2172 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1380683172615086080/interactions)  - X Week XXXXX -XX% - X Month XXXXXX -XX% - X Months XXXXXX +13% - X Year XXXXXXX +73% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1380683172615086080/posts_active)  ### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1380683172615086080/followers)  - X Week XXXXX +0.90% - X Month XXXXX +2.30% - X Months XXXXX +20% - X Year XXXXX +24% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1380683172615086080/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1380683172615086080/influence) --- **Social category influence** [countries](/list/countries) [finance](/list/finance) [technology brands](/list/technology-brands) [travel destinations](/list/travel-destinations) [stocks](/list/stocks) **Social topic influence** [china](/topic/china), [tariffs](/topic/tariffs), [trade war](/topic/trade-war), [temu](/topic/temu) #512, [gdp](/topic/gdp), [sydney](/topic/sydney), [australia](/topic/australia), [elements](/topic/elements), [$117b](/topic/$117b), [trump and](/topic/trump-and) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1380683172615086080/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "@GordonGChang The value of China's exports to the USA is exactly what percent of her total GDP Gordon It is your failure to understand basic numbers that made your books such woeful flopperoonies when it comes to predicting China's future" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980108709016830212) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-20T03:07Z 2232 followers, XXX engagements "@FreeAsInSpeech7 @mirandadevine The Hobart incident is clearer than this current one. It is not Marles's habit to be frank. I believe they are similar. In the Hobart case a long-standing agreement re no-go zones was breached by Hobart's helicopter It was chaffed /2" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980450042826879206) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-21T01:44Z 2232 followers, XX engagements "@FreeAsInSpeech7 @mirandadevine /2 Marles used practical identical words to describe it. The ship's captain Cmdr Tina Brown was prematurely relieved of her command. When she left Sydney X months earlier she was the proud fit enthusiatic captain of our first female fighting ship /3" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980450656734556671) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-21T01:46Z 2232 followers, XX engagements "@1mojorising @TruthFairy131 China is not authoritarian Ethnically dissimilar Agreed Culturally Depends what you have in mind Ultra nationalist Meaningless jabber. Militarily expanding Bullshit. China threatens Australia only to the extent we allow ourselves to be America's spear tip" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980521481001210005) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-21T06:28Z 2232 followers, XX engagements "@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire Substantiate - especially part 2" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980810869652312376) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-22T01:38Z 2232 followers, XX engagements "@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire That chart shows the impact of various actions It isn't the actions themselves Furthermore it says nothing about non-tariff actions Finally you haven't justified your "wanted it' assertion" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980827415019671931) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-22T02:43Z 2232 followers, XX engagements "@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire The Chinese people are doing OK tyvm. You have mischaracterised it. Chinese tariffs were higher than US tariffs as a result of entry into WTO negotiations at the end of 2001 Different people can have different opinions re correctness of that level BUT " [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980837203040440329) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-22T03:22Z 2232 followers, XX engagements "@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire /2 - he "responded" by raising tariffs on steel (25%) and aluminium (10%) . not generally China immediately retaliated with tariffs on pork and fruit US fired the first shot China fired back Sane people could predict where this was headed /3" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980841879148322891) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-22T03:41Z 2232 followers, XX engagements "@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire Of course they should - by negotiation You know that thing the Yanks referred to in those days as "rules based order" Not by initiating a war You still haven't addressed non-trade barriers Nor have you abswered "wanted it"" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980844219112780230) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-22T03:50Z 2232 followers, XX engagements "@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire You said China "wanted a trade war" I say Bullshit - justify that statement The other item urges you to get a more balanced picture by including non-tariff elements - there is more to a trade war than just tariffs" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980859292518609389) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-22T04:50Z 2232 followers, XX engagements "@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire The trade-weighted average applied tariffs as at the end of 2017 were US XXX% China XXX % And that had been the stable situation for many years The first significant event after that was the NTB block of Broadcom's $117B Qualcomm bid in Mar 2018 /2" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980865478806630567) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-22T05:15Z 2232 followers, XX engagements "@ChrisRMcGuire It is tit-for-tat in the sense that it would not have happened had the US not fired the first shot" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980413356113879429) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-20T23:18Z 2237 followers, XXX engagements "@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire China is willing to negotiate refuses to have a bar of Trump's "deal" or Mafia-style coercion does what is right for its prosperous people and hates the damage Trump is doing to America and the rest of the world No you are not right" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980876622464184365) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-22T05:59Z 2237 followers, XX engagements "@GordonGChang The GFC of 2008 was caused by the bursting of the US housing bubble. China bailed the US out thus reducing the harmful impact Your history rewrite is pure fantasy Gordon. A step up from your standard "just wrong" into the world of absolute bullshit" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1981498091359654367) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-23T23:08Z 2237 followers, XXX engagements "@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire BUT the 2001 tariff settings were the result of XX years of negotiation - not trade war. The US agreed to those levels. The first "shot" in the trade war was fired by Trump March X 2017 with XX% tariff on Chinese steel" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980838235413836003) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-22T03:26Z 2235 followers, XX engagements "@PeterCronau I'm not that sure about the timing. It certainly wasn't mentioned as an item that Trump and Albanese discussed I tend to think the timing was just the Yanks believing that it was time for another try" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1980859809810534502) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-22T04:52Z 2235 followers, XX engagements "@MadsMelbourne I just read the advert on this web page You have assumed inaccurately Your bank already has many of your personal details If you sign-up for CDR via your bank your are telling the bank those details can be passed on to others /2" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1981233883623674312) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-23T05:39Z 2237 followers, XX engagements "@MadsMelbourne /2 For example Temu. When you want to start an online purchasing account with Temu you just say "I am CDR#112365423" and your personal details will be passed from the bank to Temu. Saves you the hassle of typing your name address phone etc over and over again /3" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1981235195488718916) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-23T05:44Z 2235 followers, XX engagements "@MadsMelbourne /3 How does the govt get into the act Not just any old businesss can participate in CDR - they must be registered with the govt. That is the advert I see no benefit to the bank Temu or the govt They have done this nice thing for us out of the goodness of their hearts" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1981236241170649573) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-23T05:48Z 2235 followers, XX engagements "@Michael7ucci You are a Yank who is nominally loudly defending Australia's interests That further convinces me that the Aust deliberate provocation was ordered by a Yank operating under FPA - the agreement that empowers foreign command of Aust military forces Convince me otherwise" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1981238795153657911) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-23T05:58Z 2235 followers, XX engagements "@Skeletorexplain @QBCCIntegrity You didn't say where you got that bullshit from - probably @Songpinanq . she is the most prolific "social credit" liar on X. Regardless of your source take it from one who has lived there - there is no social credit system in China" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1981530355455914354) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-24T01:17Z 2235 followers, X engagements "@Skeletorexplain @QBCCIntegrity @songpinganq A phrase that I cannot relate to Australia's Digital ID conversation" [X Link](https://x.com/LanderPeterjohn/status/1981534284189147303) [@LanderPeterjohn](/creator/x/LanderPeterjohn) 2025-10-24T01:32Z 2235 followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@LanderPeterjohn Lander PeterJohn
Lander PeterJohn posts on X about china, tariffs, trade war, temu the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 2172 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Week XXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXX +13%
- X Year XXXXXXX +73%
Mentions: XX #
Followers: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXX +0.90%
- X Month XXXXX +2.30%
- X Months XXXXX +20%
- X Year XXXXX +24%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence #
Social category influence countries finance technology brands travel destinations stocks
Social topic influence china, tariffs, trade war, temu #512, gdp, sydney, australia, elements, $117b, trump and
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@GordonGChang The value of China's exports to the USA is exactly what percent of her total GDP Gordon It is your failure to understand basic numbers that made your books such woeful flopperoonies when it comes to predicting China's future"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-20T03:07Z 2232 followers, XXX engagements
"@FreeAsInSpeech7 @mirandadevine The Hobart incident is clearer than this current one. It is not Marles's habit to be frank. I believe they are similar. In the Hobart case a long-standing agreement re no-go zones was breached by Hobart's helicopter It was chaffed /2"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-21T01:44Z 2232 followers, XX engagements
"@FreeAsInSpeech7 @mirandadevine /2 Marles used practical identical words to describe it. The ship's captain Cmdr Tina Brown was prematurely relieved of her command. When she left Sydney X months earlier she was the proud fit enthusiatic captain of our first female fighting ship /3"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-21T01:46Z 2232 followers, XX engagements
"@1mojorising @TruthFairy131 China is not authoritarian Ethnically dissimilar Agreed Culturally Depends what you have in mind Ultra nationalist Meaningless jabber. Militarily expanding Bullshit. China threatens Australia only to the extent we allow ourselves to be America's spear tip"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-21T06:28Z 2232 followers, XX engagements
"@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire Substantiate - especially part 2"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-22T01:38Z 2232 followers, XX engagements
"@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire That chart shows the impact of various actions It isn't the actions themselves Furthermore it says nothing about non-tariff actions Finally you haven't justified your "wanted it' assertion"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-22T02:43Z 2232 followers, XX engagements
"@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire The Chinese people are doing OK tyvm. You have mischaracterised it. Chinese tariffs were higher than US tariffs as a result of entry into WTO negotiations at the end of 2001 Different people can have different opinions re correctness of that level BUT "
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-22T03:22Z 2232 followers, XX engagements
"@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire /2 - he "responded" by raising tariffs on steel (25%) and aluminium (10%) . not generally China immediately retaliated with tariffs on pork and fruit US fired the first shot China fired back Sane people could predict where this was headed /3"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-22T03:41Z 2232 followers, XX engagements
"@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire Of course they should - by negotiation You know that thing the Yanks referred to in those days as "rules based order" Not by initiating a war You still haven't addressed non-trade barriers Nor have you abswered "wanted it""
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-22T03:50Z 2232 followers, XX engagements
"@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire You said China "wanted a trade war" I say Bullshit - justify that statement The other item urges you to get a more balanced picture by including non-tariff elements - there is more to a trade war than just tariffs"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-22T04:50Z 2232 followers, XX engagements
"@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire The trade-weighted average applied tariffs as at the end of 2017 were US XXX% China XXX % And that had been the stable situation for many years The first significant event after that was the NTB block of Broadcom's $117B Qualcomm bid in Mar 2018 /2"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-22T05:15Z 2232 followers, XX engagements
"@ChrisRMcGuire It is tit-for-tat in the sense that it would not have happened had the US not fired the first shot"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-20T23:18Z 2237 followers, XXX engagements
"@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire China is willing to negotiate refuses to have a bar of Trump's "deal" or Mafia-style coercion does what is right for its prosperous people and hates the damage Trump is doing to America and the rest of the world No you are not right"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-22T05:59Z 2237 followers, XX engagements
"@GordonGChang The GFC of 2008 was caused by the bursting of the US housing bubble. China bailed the US out thus reducing the harmful impact Your history rewrite is pure fantasy Gordon. A step up from your standard "just wrong" into the world of absolute bullshit"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-23T23:08Z 2237 followers, XXX engagements
"@Why__Knot @ChrisRMcGuire BUT the 2001 tariff settings were the result of XX years of negotiation - not trade war. The US agreed to those levels. The first "shot" in the trade war was fired by Trump March X 2017 with XX% tariff on Chinese steel"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-22T03:26Z 2235 followers, XX engagements
"@PeterCronau I'm not that sure about the timing. It certainly wasn't mentioned as an item that Trump and Albanese discussed I tend to think the timing was just the Yanks believing that it was time for another try"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-22T04:52Z 2235 followers, XX engagements
"@MadsMelbourne I just read the advert on this web page You have assumed inaccurately Your bank already has many of your personal details If you sign-up for CDR via your bank your are telling the bank those details can be passed on to others /2"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-23T05:39Z 2237 followers, XX engagements
"@MadsMelbourne /2 For example Temu. When you want to start an online purchasing account with Temu you just say "I am CDR#112365423" and your personal details will be passed from the bank to Temu. Saves you the hassle of typing your name address phone etc over and over again /3"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-23T05:44Z 2235 followers, XX engagements
"@MadsMelbourne /3 How does the govt get into the act Not just any old businesss can participate in CDR - they must be registered with the govt. That is the advert I see no benefit to the bank Temu or the govt They have done this nice thing for us out of the goodness of their hearts"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-23T05:48Z 2235 followers, XX engagements
"@Michael7ucci You are a Yank who is nominally loudly defending Australia's interests That further convinces me that the Aust deliberate provocation was ordered by a Yank operating under FPA - the agreement that empowers foreign command of Aust military forces Convince me otherwise"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-23T05:58Z 2235 followers, XX engagements
"@Skeletorexplain @QBCCIntegrity You didn't say where you got that bullshit from - probably @Songpinanq . she is the most prolific "social credit" liar on X. Regardless of your source take it from one who has lived there - there is no social credit system in China"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-24T01:17Z 2235 followers, X engagements
"@Skeletorexplain @QBCCIntegrity @songpinganq A phrase that I cannot relate to Australia's Digital ID conversation"
X Link @LanderPeterjohn 2025-10-24T01:32Z 2235 followers, XX engagements