Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@JeeC84 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1330186038.png) @JeeC84 JeeC ☀️

JeeC ☀️ posts on X about rwa, blackrock, tokenization, level the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1330186038/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1330186038/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXX -XXXX%
- X Months XXXXXXX +105%

### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1330186038/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1330186038/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XXX +48%
- X Months XXX +82%

### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1330186038/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1330186038/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXX +3.50%
- X Month XXX +15%
- X Months XXX +41%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1330186038/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1330186038/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[finance](/list/finance)  XXXXX% [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  XXXXX% [stocks](/list/stocks)  XXXX% [celebrities](/list/celebrities)  XXXX% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  XXXX%

**Social topic influence**
[rwa](/topic/rwa) 5.13%, [blackrock](/topic/blackrock) #189, [tokenization](/topic/tokenization) #218, [level](/topic/level) 5.13%, [redemption](/topic/redemption) 5.13%, [defi](/topic/defi) 2.56%, [the official](/topic/the-official) 2.56%, [guess](/topic/guess) 2.56%, [native](/topic/native) 2.56%, [just a](/topic/just-a) XXXX%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@deepseektetra](/creator/undefined) [@plasticdogs](/creator/undefined) [@enosysglobal](/creator/undefined) [@thanaenosys](/creator/undefined) [@flarenetworks](/creator/undefined) [@hugophilion](/creator/undefined) [@ksw54548](/creator/undefined) [@bttaylormade](/creator/undefined) [@santiag78758327](/creator/undefined) [@thana_enosys](/creator/undefined) [@aixbt_agent](/creator/undefined) [@firelightfi](/creator/undefined) [@ghxxst9491](/creator/undefined) [@jrdothoughts](/creator/undefined) [@blackrock](/creator/undefined) [@joelkatz](/creator/undefined) [@aixbtagent](/creator/undefined) [@sentorahq](/creator/undefined) [@claudeai](/creator/undefined) [@ofvoice25355](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[BlackRock Inc (BLK)](/topic/blackrock) [xMoney (UTK)](/topic/xmoney) [Sui (SUI)](/topic/$sui) [Ethereum (ETH)](/topic/ethereum) [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [Chainlink (LINK)](/topic/chainlink)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"One thing Im still trying to fully understand is the separation of concerns in the final architecture. As FXRP stXRP and Firelight mature would it be fair to say that: 1/ execution can happen across multiple chains 2/ while risk parameters coverage logic and protocol safety remain anchored to Flare In other words Flare acting as the coordination + risk layer rather than the execution venue itself. Fucking huge 🚀 #Web3 #Crypto #RWAs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1999703300753489976)  2025-12-13T04:49Z XXX followers, 4141 engagements


"🚨Firelight was clearly built to interact with an institutional-grade risk engine. interesting but no DeFi protocol offers that today well not publicly anyway. But Firelights own docs make it obvious: Firelight does NOT perform risk assessment. Firelight does NOT decide when a protocol is safe or unsafe. Firelight acts as an external protection layer for lending bridging CDPs and other protocols. So Firelight isnt evaluating risk ; its consuming it. Which means some external engine must be providing solvency signals risk params stress-tests etc. And Firelight even says its designed to: ➡"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1996223778653720686)  2025-12-03T14:23Z XXX followers, 5647 engagements


"@BTtaylormade I actually think stXRP is the prototype of the universal tokenisation model Flare want to expand. A representation with on-chain pricing verified data and no CEX dependency. My guess is that the plan is to extend this model to other assets ; and later to RWA through partners"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1998585228978204981)  2025-12-10T02:47Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"XRPL is the ideal registry for institutional assets: ➡ISO 20022 native (via RippleNet) ➡ ultra-fast settlement ➡12 years of flawless reliability ➡originally designed for banks ➡MPT (Multi-Purpose Tokens) the tokenization game-changer Some people reference BUIDL but BUIDL is simply the training ground for institutions ; including BlackRock. In TradFi nothing goes into production without: 1/ modeling 2/ rehearsal 3/ data harvesting 4/ risk simulations And of course BlackRock uses this phase to feed ALADDIN ; the more data it ingests the smarter it becomes. XRPL with its MPT standard is the"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1998210715774067062)  2025-12-09T01:58Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@Santiag78758327 But tokenized value needs programmable logic. Thats where Flare comes in. As @HugoPhilion said: -- PMWs allow XRPL assets to follow rules executed on Flare. So: 1XRPL = value 2Flare = logic #Flare #FTSO #FDC #SmartContracts"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1998211242323050973)  2025-12-09T02:00Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"👀Flare / Songbird / Enosys why two governance tokens actually makes sense (and I didnt get it at first either) For a long time many people didnt understand this ; me included. Why does Enosys have two governance tokens APS on Flare SFIN on Songbird. Two networks two gouvernances for what exact reason Most assumed Songbird was just a canary network. But reading Enosys whitepaper carefully you notice something: ➡The system integrates institutional-grade risk frameworks. ➡Capital efficiency and solvency follow institutional requirements. But Enosys never says it hosts a risk engine. It only"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1998411536658780640)  2025-12-09T15:16Z XXX followers, 2085 engagements


"@PlasticDogs @Thana_Enosys I do agree but that makes sense for structural and systemic decisions. But theres also a category of decisions that impacts protocol potential rather than its core architecture. Thats where on chain governance can add value without compromising stability"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1999265721847808277)  2025-12-11T23:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"⚠ MUST READ (my own deep dive) : This is my analyssis ; an investigation into how all the pieces acctually align across XRPL Flare Firelight Enosys and the coming institutional RWA wave. Its not perfect it's not offficial. It's just me looking at the puzzle with a wider lens probabbly too wide lol. And honestly the more you zoom out the harder it is to unsee whats hapenning. 🔹 Before anything: what Larry Fink ACTUALLY said (2016 2023) When you line up his statements over 8+ years the architecture of XRPL + Flare + Enosys + Firelight suddenly looks well kinda inevitable. 2016 : Without proper"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1996364519946219681)  2025-12-03T23:42Z XXX followers, 6092 engagements


"👀 BlackRock What Was Invisible Is Starting to Show. Reading #LarryFink and @robgoldstein in The Economist just hits different when youve studied the #Flare/#Enosys/#Firelight stack for months. They describe exactly what this industry has been needing: a neutral verifiable shared ledger instant settlement unified market structure on chain risk controls interoperability across ALL asset classes That chain they outline It looks a lot like Flare. And the institutional tools they implicitly require Enosys + Firelight are built precisely for that. ➡Enosys is to me a real iceberg. We see the"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1996912191191023727)  2025-12-05T11:59Z XXX followers, 4136 engagements


"@Thana_Enosys @enosys_global @FlareNetworks "Stability Pools and Redemption Order" 👀👀 Darren is your redemption order strictly collateral based (like Liquity) or do you also use time weigted priority vault weight or branch level parameters"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1998222960633536971)  2025-12-09T02:47Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@Thana_Enosys @enosys_global @FlareNetworks So it seems that the redemption order adapts over time as sp/debt ratios evolve rather than using a staticque liquity style rule. Very interesting 👀"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1998433107888988471)  2025-12-09T16:42Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"👀 Dec XX & Dec XX : worth watching There seem to be upcoming announcements involving Flare around those dates. With @XMoney expected before Dec XX (and already live internally per Elon) timing is interesting. XRPL for value rails + Flare for programmability 🤔 @elonmusk any chance this is connected #Flare #XRPL #XMoney #Crypto #Payments"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/2000345849872748797)  2025-12-14T23:23Z XXX followers, 1202 engagements


"He is right but XRPL is a value registry and settlement layer. It was never designed for dApp heavy development by design. Stellar Sui etc. are app-oriented chains ; thats their role and it makes sense they attract more devs. XRPL on the other hand is increasingly positioning itself as an institutional settlement rail. So lets compare like with like. And ultimately as chains become natively and trustlessly interconnected what will matter is the end result and the quality of the service delivered. #XRPL #Blockchain #Payments #Settlement #Tokenization #Interoperability #Crypto #Web3"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/2000542591062798458)  2025-12-15T12:24Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"Good morning @enosys_global I need a clarification regarding #SFIN staking and the type of SFIN sold on Enosys . From what I understand: - The SFIN that we buy or swap on Enosys is the EVM version (ERC-20 on Songbird). - The real governance SFIN (the one that can be staked/voted with) exists only on Songbird Cosmos. - And because of this separation the SFIN sold on Enosys (EVM) cannot be staked in the SFIN governance module. Is this correct Im trying to stake SFIN through Enosys but every transaction fails (Ledger rejects it). So I want to confirm whether its simply because staking only works"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1999085457032745319)  2025-12-11T11:54Z XXX followers, 1190 engagements


"Hi everyone Quick question for longtime #Enosys users: ❓ Has anyone ever participated in an Enosys (Flare / SGB) vote other than the current one on Flare - I mean a real HLN/APS/SFIN governance vote. ❓ Has anyone ever seen a governance vote on Songbird - There seems to be no public history anywhere. ❓ Does anyone know where the full voting history is stored - (Flare Explorer Songbird Explorer Cosmos module Something else) Its surprising: 1/ Enosys has existed for years 2/ #HLN and #APS are supposed to be governance tokens 3/ And yet I cant find ANY record of past votes 🤔 If someone has a"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1999218759882670557)  2025-12-11T20:44Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"Firelight: the technological Trojan Horse 🐴 What if while everyones staring at a Liquity-like a real institutional CDP is quietly being built A master-piece forged in silnce : a Dynamically-Managed Institutional CDP. Meanwhile Firelight is coming to Ethereum (Aave ) and will offer: clean liquidations real-time solvency anti-bank-run safety integrated insurance but more importantly: granular programmable hop-by-hop insurance. As Jess explained: every swap every bridge every lending hop can carry its own micro-insurance payload. A complete paradigm shift ; and all without leaving ETH. What"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/1995918388531429835)  2025-12-02T18:10Z XXX followers, 2699 engagements


"I get the joke but Im not sure #Bitcoin is going away. Not everything survive by being useful in execution. Gold doesnt do much either its rare slow inefficient ; yet it remains a reserve asset because of collective belief. Bitcoin seems to be evolving in the same direction: less as a transactional network more as a monetary refrence. Other chain may outperform it technically but reserve status is about social momentum not features. That momentum for now clearly still belongs to BTC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/2000235811871080533)  2025-12-14T16:05Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"No. Chainlink sells a service. Flare provides a systemic infrastructure : 1/ LINK fits as an oracle midleware not as the architecture institutions ultimately want. 2/ On Flare verification happens at the protocol level. With LINK verification is an added layer (an extra intermediary). 3/ LINKs model relies on the consuming smart contract while Flare is built around deterministic execution (same input same output). That difference matters at institutional scale. Institutions often start with plug-and-play solutions like LINK to experiment ; they always test before deploying the final"  
[X Link](https://x.com/JeeC84/status/2000584913599246821)  2025-12-15T15:13Z XXX followers, XX engagements

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@JeeC84 Avatar @JeeC84 JeeC ☀️

JeeC ☀️ posts on X about rwa, blackrock, tokenization, level the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

  • X Week XXXXXX -XX%
  • X Month XXXXXX -XXXX%
  • X Months XXXXXXX +105%

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

  • X Week XX -XX%
  • X Month XXX +48%
  • X Months XXX +82%

Followers: XXX #

Followers Line Chart

  • X Week XXX +3.50%
  • X Month XXX +15%
  • X Months XXX +41%

CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence finance XXXXX% cryptocurrencies XXXXX% stocks XXXX% celebrities XXXX% technology brands XXXX%

Social topic influence rwa 5.13%, blackrock #189, tokenization #218, level 5.13%, redemption 5.13%, defi 2.56%, the official 2.56%, guess 2.56%, native 2.56%, just a XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @deepseektetra @plasticdogs @enosysglobal @thanaenosys @flarenetworks @hugophilion @ksw54548 @bttaylormade @santiag78758327 @thana_enosys @aixbt_agent @firelightfi @ghxxst9491 @jrdothoughts @blackrock @joelkatz @aixbtagent @sentorahq @claudeai @ofvoice25355

Top assets mentioned BlackRock Inc (BLK) xMoney (UTK) Sui (SUI) Ethereum (ETH) Bitcoin (BTC) Chainlink (LINK)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"One thing Im still trying to fully understand is the separation of concerns in the final architecture. As FXRP stXRP and Firelight mature would it be fair to say that: 1/ execution can happen across multiple chains 2/ while risk parameters coverage logic and protocol safety remain anchored to Flare In other words Flare acting as the coordination + risk layer rather than the execution venue itself. Fucking huge 🚀 #Web3 #Crypto #RWAs"
X Link 2025-12-13T04:49Z XXX followers, 4141 engagements

"🚨Firelight was clearly built to interact with an institutional-grade risk engine. interesting but no DeFi protocol offers that today well not publicly anyway. But Firelights own docs make it obvious: Firelight does NOT perform risk assessment. Firelight does NOT decide when a protocol is safe or unsafe. Firelight acts as an external protection layer for lending bridging CDPs and other protocols. So Firelight isnt evaluating risk ; its consuming it. Which means some external engine must be providing solvency signals risk params stress-tests etc. And Firelight even says its designed to: ➡"
X Link 2025-12-03T14:23Z XXX followers, 5647 engagements

"@BTtaylormade I actually think stXRP is the prototype of the universal tokenisation model Flare want to expand. A representation with on-chain pricing verified data and no CEX dependency. My guess is that the plan is to extend this model to other assets ; and later to RWA through partners"
X Link 2025-12-10T02:47Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"XRPL is the ideal registry for institutional assets: ➡ISO 20022 native (via RippleNet) ➡ ultra-fast settlement ➡12 years of flawless reliability ➡originally designed for banks ➡MPT (Multi-Purpose Tokens) the tokenization game-changer Some people reference BUIDL but BUIDL is simply the training ground for institutions ; including BlackRock. In TradFi nothing goes into production without: 1/ modeling 2/ rehearsal 3/ data harvesting 4/ risk simulations And of course BlackRock uses this phase to feed ALADDIN ; the more data it ingests the smarter it becomes. XRPL with its MPT standard is the"
X Link 2025-12-09T01:58Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@Santiag78758327 But tokenized value needs programmable logic. Thats where Flare comes in. As @HugoPhilion said: -- PMWs allow XRPL assets to follow rules executed on Flare. So: 1XRPL = value 2Flare = logic #Flare #FTSO #FDC #SmartContracts"
X Link 2025-12-09T02:00Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"👀Flare / Songbird / Enosys why two governance tokens actually makes sense (and I didnt get it at first either) For a long time many people didnt understand this ; me included. Why does Enosys have two governance tokens APS on Flare SFIN on Songbird. Two networks two gouvernances for what exact reason Most assumed Songbird was just a canary network. But reading Enosys whitepaper carefully you notice something: ➡The system integrates institutional-grade risk frameworks. ➡Capital efficiency and solvency follow institutional requirements. But Enosys never says it hosts a risk engine. It only"
X Link 2025-12-09T15:16Z XXX followers, 2085 engagements

"@PlasticDogs @Thana_Enosys I do agree but that makes sense for structural and systemic decisions. But theres also a category of decisions that impacts protocol potential rather than its core architecture. Thats where on chain governance can add value without compromising stability"
X Link 2025-12-11T23:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"⚠ MUST READ (my own deep dive) : This is my analyssis ; an investigation into how all the pieces acctually align across XRPL Flare Firelight Enosys and the coming institutional RWA wave. Its not perfect it's not offficial. It's just me looking at the puzzle with a wider lens probabbly too wide lol. And honestly the more you zoom out the harder it is to unsee whats hapenning. 🔹 Before anything: what Larry Fink ACTUALLY said (2016 2023) When you line up his statements over 8+ years the architecture of XRPL + Flare + Enosys + Firelight suddenly looks well kinda inevitable. 2016 : Without proper"
X Link 2025-12-03T23:42Z XXX followers, 6092 engagements

"👀 BlackRock What Was Invisible Is Starting to Show. Reading #LarryFink and @robgoldstein in The Economist just hits different when youve studied the #Flare/#Enosys/#Firelight stack for months. They describe exactly what this industry has been needing: a neutral verifiable shared ledger instant settlement unified market structure on chain risk controls interoperability across ALL asset classes That chain they outline It looks a lot like Flare. And the institutional tools they implicitly require Enosys + Firelight are built precisely for that. ➡Enosys is to me a real iceberg. We see the"
X Link 2025-12-05T11:59Z XXX followers, 4136 engagements

"@Thana_Enosys @enosys_global @FlareNetworks "Stability Pools and Redemption Order" 👀👀 Darren is your redemption order strictly collateral based (like Liquity) or do you also use time weigted priority vault weight or branch level parameters"
X Link 2025-12-09T02:47Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@Thana_Enosys @enosys_global @FlareNetworks So it seems that the redemption order adapts over time as sp/debt ratios evolve rather than using a staticque liquity style rule. Very interesting 👀"
X Link 2025-12-09T16:42Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"👀 Dec XX & Dec XX : worth watching There seem to be upcoming announcements involving Flare around those dates. With @XMoney expected before Dec XX (and already live internally per Elon) timing is interesting. XRPL for value rails + Flare for programmability 🤔 @elonmusk any chance this is connected #Flare #XRPL #XMoney #Crypto #Payments"
X Link 2025-12-14T23:23Z XXX followers, 1202 engagements

"He is right but XRPL is a value registry and settlement layer. It was never designed for dApp heavy development by design. Stellar Sui etc. are app-oriented chains ; thats their role and it makes sense they attract more devs. XRPL on the other hand is increasingly positioning itself as an institutional settlement rail. So lets compare like with like. And ultimately as chains become natively and trustlessly interconnected what will matter is the end result and the quality of the service delivered. #XRPL #Blockchain #Payments #Settlement #Tokenization #Interoperability #Crypto #Web3"
X Link 2025-12-15T12:24Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Good morning @enosys_global I need a clarification regarding #SFIN staking and the type of SFIN sold on Enosys . From what I understand: - The SFIN that we buy or swap on Enosys is the EVM version (ERC-20 on Songbird). - The real governance SFIN (the one that can be staked/voted with) exists only on Songbird Cosmos. - And because of this separation the SFIN sold on Enosys (EVM) cannot be staked in the SFIN governance module. Is this correct Im trying to stake SFIN through Enosys but every transaction fails (Ledger rejects it). So I want to confirm whether its simply because staking only works"
X Link 2025-12-11T11:54Z XXX followers, 1190 engagements

"Hi everyone Quick question for longtime #Enosys users: ❓ Has anyone ever participated in an Enosys (Flare / SGB) vote other than the current one on Flare - I mean a real HLN/APS/SFIN governance vote. ❓ Has anyone ever seen a governance vote on Songbird - There seems to be no public history anywhere. ❓ Does anyone know where the full voting history is stored - (Flare Explorer Songbird Explorer Cosmos module Something else) Its surprising: 1/ Enosys has existed for years 2/ #HLN and #APS are supposed to be governance tokens 3/ And yet I cant find ANY record of past votes 🤔 If someone has a"
X Link 2025-12-11T20:44Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Firelight: the technological Trojan Horse 🐴 What if while everyones staring at a Liquity-like a real institutional CDP is quietly being built A master-piece forged in silnce : a Dynamically-Managed Institutional CDP. Meanwhile Firelight is coming to Ethereum (Aave ) and will offer: clean liquidations real-time solvency anti-bank-run safety integrated insurance but more importantly: granular programmable hop-by-hop insurance. As Jess explained: every swap every bridge every lending hop can carry its own micro-insurance payload. A complete paradigm shift ; and all without leaving ETH. What"
X Link 2025-12-02T18:10Z XXX followers, 2699 engagements

"I get the joke but Im not sure #Bitcoin is going away. Not everything survive by being useful in execution. Gold doesnt do much either its rare slow inefficient ; yet it remains a reserve asset because of collective belief. Bitcoin seems to be evolving in the same direction: less as a transactional network more as a monetary refrence. Other chain may outperform it technically but reserve status is about social momentum not features. That momentum for now clearly still belongs to BTC"
X Link 2025-12-14T16:05Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"No. Chainlink sells a service. Flare provides a systemic infrastructure : 1/ LINK fits as an oracle midleware not as the architecture institutions ultimately want. 2/ On Flare verification happens at the protocol level. With LINK verification is an added layer (an extra intermediary). 3/ LINKs model relies on the consuming smart contract while Flare is built around deterministic execution (same input same output). That difference matters at institutional scale. Institutions often start with plug-and-play solutions like LINK to experiment ; they always test before deploying the final"
X Link 2025-12-15T15:13Z XXX followers, XX engagements

@JeeC84
/creator/twitter::JeeC84