#  @HODLingOnward Hodl Onward 🔑 Hodl Onward 🔑 posts on X about bitcoin, hodl, if you, the most the most. They currently have [-----] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [---] engagements in the last [--] hours. ### Engagements: [---] [#](/creator/twitter::1194955586762366976/interactions)  - [--] Week [-----] +48% - [--] Month [------] +429% - [--] Months [------] +200% - [--] Year [------] +50% ### Mentions: [--] [#](/creator/twitter::1194955586762366976/posts_active)  - [--] Week [---] +171% - [--] Month [---] +2,300% - [--] Months [---] +138% - [--] Year [---] +78% ### Followers: [-----] [#](/creator/twitter::1194955586762366976/followers)  - [--] Week [-----] +0.53% - [--] Month [-----] +1.40% - [--] Months [-----] +0.90% - [--] Year [-----] +3.20% ### CreatorRank: [---------] [#](/creator/twitter::1194955586762366976/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [finance](/list/finance) 86.49% [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) 52.25% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands) 7.21% [social networks](/list/social-networks) 5.41% [vc firms](/list/vc-firms) #508 [exchanges](/list/exchanges) 0.9% [stocks](/list/stocks) 0.9% [countries](/list/countries) 0.9% [travel destinations](/list/travel-destinations) 0.9% **Social topic influence** [bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) 43.24%, [hodl](/topic/hodl) #280, [if you](/topic/if-you) 10.81%, [the most](/topic/the-most) 7.21%, [network](/topic/network) #2829, [spam](/topic/spam) #1340, [twitter](/topic/twitter) 5.41%, [bch](/topic/bch) #507, [matter](/topic/matter) 4.5%, [you dont](/topic/you-dont) 4.5% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@hodlonaut](/creator/undefined) [@oomahq](/creator/undefined) [@stepnoy385394](/creator/undefined) [@catotheelder17](/creator/undefined) [@cpepetricio](/creator/undefined) [@flytheelephant1](/creator/undefined) [@stephanlivera](/creator/undefined) [@wsbitcoin](/creator/undefined) [@swaaalla](/creator/undefined) [@rektsorekt](/creator/undefined) [@axexang](/creator/undefined) [@conza](/creator/undefined) [@ap_hanley](/creator/undefined) [@pledditor](/creator/undefined) [@separ8](/creator/undefined) [@tonevays](/creator/undefined) [@theonevortex](/creator/undefined) [@aphanley](/creator/undefined) [@w_s_bitcoin](/creator/undefined) [@nvk](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [Coinbase Global Inc. (COIN)](/topic/coinbase) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours "@Pledditor What do you think the ticker will be for our airdrop My bet is BTH for Bitcoin Holy" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2016887870540190192) 2026-01-29T14:55Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@LukeDashjr @GrassFedBitcoin What are you going to call your shitfork Bitcoin Holy What's your ticker going to be BTH" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2019445819837948078) 2026-02-05T16:19Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "So Luke blocked me like a little bitch after saying "no ur the fork" which is either evidence Luke is stupid (unlikely) oorrrr that guy is absolutely the next Gavin aka a liar who wants to pump his own shitfork coin. I think his goal is to establish BTH You have all been warned" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2019448716143304811) 2026-02-05T16:31Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@freddienew @bitcoinhodlco Where ya headed I detect a distinct lack of stagdoos on that flight. I thought easyJet only flew to ibizia lol" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2019711782441599090) 2026-02-06T09:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@TheStalwart Miners often have fixed contracts for electricity price. If Bitcoin mining gives the most return the miners are on. If a different use of the electricity gives a better return the miners get turned off. It's pretty simple" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2019736183090372980) 2026-02-06T11:33Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@hodlonaut @oomahq Genuine question for you guys. What happens/what do you do when this contentious fork doesn't activate any time soon likely at all" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2019812383385100542) 2026-02-06T16:36Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@oomahq @hodlonaut See this is the part I don't get you want to fight contention with even more contention. BIP110 is objectively unpopular (2% of nodes 0% miners) I don't like the spam at all I think it's a shitty externality and would prefer it is gone. But BIP110 is fucking stupid" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2019816404133016043) 2026-02-06T16:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@oomahq @hodlonaut I fail to see how 55% is an appropriate level of consensus. It is deliberatly hostile" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2019818850494345409) 2026-02-06T17:01Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@oomahq @hodlonaut Vile. Will never run this shit. The good news is no one else will either. BIP110 is a fucking amazing own goal. I potentially would have been aligned to a consensus change to deal with the non-financial data but definitely not BIP110 and definitely not with only 55%" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2019820707568603634) 2026-02-06T17:09Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@freddienew @bitcoinhodlco @CoinCornerMolly Enjoy the easyJet to magaluf my friend 🫡" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2019861776033276245) 2026-02-06T19:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@BtcLiberty @hodlonaut @oomahq What the fuck. Taproot wasn't contentious and a great example of how things -should- work with consensus and careful coordination What you're advocating would break lightning lol Also LOL at "if our contentious change isn't adopted MORE extreme measures" as if that would work" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020104719310467230) 2026-02-07T11:57Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut I disagree obviously I can't prove what's going to happen in the future but I absolutely feel a chain split coming. There will never be consensus behind Luke and Co nor their proposals because a) not good from a technical perspective and b) they've burned too many bridges" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020106869822407000) 2026-02-07T12:06Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut This will end up going the separate chain route BTC is Bitcoin and BTC is the longest chain with the most work. There is no universe in which 95%+ of the current network flips. That leaves two paths: -fruitless forever waste of effort to change BTC; or -a minority chain split" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020107436380582015) 2026-02-07T12:08Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut I hope for your sake you stick with BTC instead of following Luke off into the shitcoin wilderness" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020107592798797974) 2026-02-07T12:09Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut You're correct about the -intent- of a soft fork. Intend and design do not guarantee outcomes that is why extremely high coordination and consensus is sought for successful soft forks. Two chains can result from this due to low coordination and consensus. Intent =/ outcome" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020110003823067632) 2026-02-07T12:18Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut Beside that my prediction is that BIP110 will fail to do anything and then some will pivot to desiring a chain split due to being unable to force through the desired outcome. There will be an evolution. You guys are going down the path of eventually abandoning BTC" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020110628547956887) 2026-02-07T12:21Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut 55% isn't consensus and coordination it's a hostile takeover" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020113380992745944) 2026-02-07T12:32Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut You have step outside yourself for a second - all of the BCH people similarly were of the opinion that they were the most hardcore original Satoshi disciple bitcoiners too" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020113715438244206) 2026-02-07T12:33Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@notgrubles @knutsvanholm And with 55% it's a hostile takeover attempt rather than a good faith proposal for acheiving actual soft fork consensus. It's bullshit" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020517947207274550) 2026-02-08T15:19Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@LPCapitalChi Sounds like the perfect time for a HELOC or personal loan to buy Bitcoin lol Congrats big milestone" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020527392985333851) 2026-02-08T15:57Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@PeterMcCormack You do have some pretty shit people on your discount Joe Rogan show and people are allowed to be upset about that. Freedom cuts both ways we are all free to call it thus" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020783275518668896) 2026-02-09T08:54Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@axexang @nvk If someone spins up [--] BIP110 nodes in AWS that doesn't matter. It's the -users- of the network who matter. Those who use the coins determine the rules they want to follow whether that's merchants exchanges or holders of coins. Miners follow the economic activity (fees)" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020880304697708699) 2026-02-09T15:19Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@stephanlivera @MrHodl Given my cold card has never been connected to another device and I generated the keys myself with dice that would be quite the malware attack 😁" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020884521931960808) 2026-02-09T15:36Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@axexang @nvk Christ. Capital is a) funding development b) social capital in building consensus c) people willing to back a side during a fork All of that today is overwhelmingly behind BTC. BIP110 will fail. Your choice will then be BTC or "BTH - Bitcoin Holy by Luke" if they fork" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020889305120383330) 2026-02-09T15:55Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@axexang @nvk My son you sound exactly like a BSVer. The white paper is a great artefact as part of Bitcoin's history but it is not a governance document nor is it holy. Bitcoin is what we the network make of it through consensus and code" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020890923467526411) 2026-02-09T16:01Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@axexang @nvk All of you Knots BIP110 people seem to think likes on Twitter and empty AWS nodes will allow your minority to steamroll the Bitcoin protocol. People like NVK and myself who understand how forks and network coordination work are trying to warn you so you don't make a mistake" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020891341765349499) 2026-02-09T16:03Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@axexang @nvk A shitcoin is anything that isn't BTC. That's the real Bitcoin. You'd fit in well with the BSV crowd" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020903955924975911) 2026-02-09T16:53Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@NEEDcreations @w_s_bitcoin You'll have less hash than BSV in that case lol" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021255238447952281) 2026-02-10T16:09Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@w_s_bitcoin I think BIP110 is supposed to activate once 55% of blocks during a difficulty period have been mined with signal active so in theory they are aiming for "majority" hashrate from the get go. The point is they'll never get close to that amount" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021255817182187744) 2026-02-10T16:11Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@sion6EQUJ5 @Co2Money @w_s_bitcoin First of all it will be called Bitcoin Holy and it will use ticket BTH. We can meme it that way and it will be so. The chain must be scrubbed of unholy material after all. Second it won't do anything to BTC because the economic incentives and past history show it won't" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021586510139593179) 2026-02-11T14:05Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@heavilyarmedc BIP110 shitfork known as Bitcoin Holy - only godly and Pope Luke approved material on chain. Ticker BTH" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021586951258652970) 2026-02-11T14:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@Pledditor Bitcoin Holy (BTH) is what we should call the BIP110 chain when it fails to activate and they fork off. It'll be the clean pure chain scrubbed of unholy material as determined by his Holiness Pope Luke I" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021589956158779889) 2026-02-11T14:19Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CatoTheElder17 @Pledditor Why would BTC need to do anything It is the longest chain with the most work and all the economic nodes use it I think you may be confused about what Bitcoin is and you are proving my point. BTH will fit in great with BCH and BSV as another minority chain with dumb rules" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021592221644980432) 2026-02-11T14:28Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CatoTheElder17 @Pledditor Or maybe you can't read and you missed the part where I said "when BIP110 fails to activate" - it (deservedly) has no hope of activation. At that point you Bitcoin Holy people will need to choose: stick with BTC or fork. Choose wisely" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021592593486811295) 2026-02-11T14:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@JoeCarlasare @TuurDemeester At a certain point we may need explore alternatives" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021599316096278921) 2026-02-11T14:56Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@separ8 @ToneVays @Beautyon_ Ah yes that age old principle of Bitcoin proof of node rather than proof of work. The valid chain is the longest one with the most work. Do you guys even understand the basics of why BTC is Bitcoin and BCH and BSV are not lol" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021602065017921649) 2026-02-11T15:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@hodlonaut That's great you're free to run whatever code you want. As long as knots stays in consensus it is a Bitcoin client. Be careful your node may adopt rules that aren't Bitcoin (BTC) at some point in the future. Don't make the mistake of updating to a different consensus regime" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021604420740407753) 2026-02-11T15:17Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@CatoTheElder17 @stephanlivera @swaaalla BTC won the first fork war and we will win this one again. The capital the technical ability the economic nodes are all behind BTC as Bitcoin. If you don't want to understand or learn the history of what -actually- happened in [----] we can't help you" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021607837579755521) 2026-02-11T15:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CatoTheElder17 @Pledditor I'll save this and we can compare notes in October. Don't fuck this up. BTC is Bitcoin" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021625101289238648) 2026-02-11T16:39Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@BitcoinMotorist @w_s_bitcoin When you say "they work" what does that look like specifically. Do they prevent inscriptions or ordinals Do they make them more expensive What's the success criteria you're describing" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021630802543423763) 2026-02-11T17:01Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@thetrocro I've been spotting this stuff in my job it's all the same with the same voice and patterns. It's definitely made me think less of certain people. There's a big difference between sifting through data faster and going "hey bot write my job outputs for me make no mistakes"" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021634048335261786) 2026-02-11T17:14Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CatoTheElder17 @stephanlivera @swaaalla You've got this wrong buddy. The lesson of [----] isn't "broad bad tighten good" The lesson is DON'T fork unless you have the overwhelming economic majority. Also I see your rhetorical fallacious question and choose to ignore it. Try again" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021640633992327580) 2026-02-11T17:41Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CatoTheElder17 @stephanlivera @swaaalla It doesn't sound like you were around then. Things were fluid The reason BTC won is because -at the moment the fork happened- the liquidity remained with the legacy chain no one adopted the hard fork. People adopted segwit. The economics followed this and miners bent the knee" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021647224086913464) 2026-02-11T18:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@BitcoinMotorist I mean coinbase is the exchange of choice for shitcoiners so it's understandable" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021649902120661340) 2026-02-11T18:17Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@swaaalla @AdamSimecka Bitcoin Holy brought to you by His Holiness Pope Luke I. Now with 2-week next block times" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021688899123269961) 2026-02-11T20:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CatoTheElder17 @swaaalla @stephanlivera And again if that bothers you no one is forcing you to run Bitcoin code or use it you are absolutely free to discontinue use if you find it morally objectionable to run that code. Or you can fork off. But your view is absolutely a minority view at best" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021701920872616333) 2026-02-11T21:44Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CatoTheElder17 @swaaalla @stephanlivera All conjecture. May be true likely isn't - there's no proof of any kind Immaterial to the technical argument Again if you find Bitcoin to be morally objectionable you are free to modify the software and run whatever code you want. We don't need to recognise your rules though" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021707472612774382) 2026-02-11T22:06Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@hodlonaut @iohewifh5934 Mate none of this is objective everything you've said is subjective. Bitcoin is ultimately a system of open source code. You're making claims about what the code ultimately does without showing what pieces of code do those things. Emotional. Very unserious" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021864428514553922) 2026-02-12T08:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CPepetricio @hodlonaut Let me get this straight. I'm supposed to understand your own personal secret unspoken definition of consensus in Bitcoin which is completely different to the actual definition. I'm just calling balls and strikes buddy sorry reality hurts you" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021877987923169788) 2026-02-12T09:24Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@PeterMcCormack @johnsguitarpage Can you articulate what legislative changes you want to existing immigration law This is all vibes based nonsense" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021878573301473397) 2026-02-12T09:26Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@Conza @hodlonaut @iohewifh5934 Run the code or don't buddy. Bitcoin is BTC" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021878691014254969) 2026-02-12T09:26Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CPepetricio @hodlonaut Is BTC the longest chain with the most work that accepts Taproot and segwit as part of consensus yes or no. If yes (hint that's the correct answer) then it is within consensus. BIP110 does not have consensus. It has minority support amongst the network" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021882450889396573) 2026-02-12T09:41Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut That is not how forks work dude. Chains do not delete themselves lol if you don't understand how Bitcoin works I think it might be wise to do some research so that you understand the dynamics here I'm trying to warn you that you're making a technical mistake based on ideology" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021886098902069301) 2026-02-12T09:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut The other critical thing - you're expecting even requiring huge levels of preparation and change from lots of entities (black rock for IBIT Strategy for their Treasury etc.) where's the economic momentum today: behind the decade plus of infrastructure in place for BTC" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021888421623431464) 2026-02-12T10:05Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut Consensus change in the modern BTC era is expensive both literally and in terms of social capital. You're all emotionally invested in making a change that a) won't actually do anything to prevent spam (maybe more expensive at best) b) could break lots of things c) (cont'd)" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021890733603704864) 2026-02-12T10:14Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut c) will spend all stored social capital on forking there will be no second opportunity for a contentious fork in this era after this one due to fatigue cost etc. We need to keep that social capital in reserve for quantum" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021890973278564541) 2026-02-12T10:15Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut You're mad the overwhelming majority of Bitcoin users do not agree with your mempool policy so you're attempting to change Bitcoin consensus. Unless you have overwhelming agreement and coordination for that consensus change you will find yourself on a minority fork chain" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021899480757616837) 2026-02-12T10:49Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut The latest version sure. No one is forced to upgrade. And I'm pretty sure (just guessing) Luke doesn't have a lever to magically turn all previous versions of knots into BIP110 signaling by default" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021905018933453160) 2026-02-12T11:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@Bitcoin_Teddy Nah been hearing this since [----]. No crash has ever materialised. People have waited and died while waiting for this alleged future housing crash" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021948793173017077) 2026-02-12T14:05Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@SpectrGen @monsterbitar @hodlonaut You're the Bcasher in this scenario buddy lol BIP110 is never going to activate. Knots couldn't even breach 20% of listening nodes. How on earth is your minority going to convince anyone to support this Economic nodes are all behind BTC as Bitcoin. Sorry that offends you" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021966192081060123) 2026-02-12T15:14Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@SpectrGen @monsterbitar @hodlonaut Irrelevant. Economic nodes are what matter. There is no current demand for this proposal except zealots on Twitter" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021969178610348335) 2026-02-12T15:26Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@MrHodl I kinda get where they're all coming from reference client defaults tend to be blindly adopted via standard upgrade paths and default configs are rarely edited. The bit they miss is that consensus valid transactions no matter how stupid are Bitcoin" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021969760049934657) 2026-02-12T15:28Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CapitalSatoshi Enjoy Bitcoin Holy (BTH) when you inevitably fork off to establish the Real Maxi Bitcoin then I guess. BIP110 is never activating. I hope for your sake you stick with BTC" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021981542604775710) 2026-02-12T16:15Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@w_s_bitcoin @notgrubles @MrHodl We should get an office bet pool going on this" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022067406496256227) 2026-02-12T21:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@stepnoy385394 Do you really think El Salvador is considering divesting it's BTC because there's extra data in blocks" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022222488881836321) 2026-02-13T08:13Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@Conza @hodlonaut @iohewifh5934 Are you saying BTC isn't Bitcoin" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022223962676375901) 2026-02-13T08:18Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@Conza @hodlonaut @iohewifh5934 You seem to think you're entitled to force people to run the code you want. People all users hold that Bitcoin has [--] million coins no more. It's trivial to fix something like that since everyone will demand a fix. BIP110 has no meaningful support. It is out of consensus" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022235461411012700) 2026-02-13T09:04Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@separ8 @hodlonaut @ToneVays @theonevortex @BitMEXResearch That sounds like the sort of thing a Bcasher would say. BTC is Bitcoin. If you use BTC's rules you are a bitcoiner. If you adopt alternative rules you are not running Bitcoin Be very careful that Knots doesn't rugpull you by causing a chainsplit. It won't today. But pay attn" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022311631032623267) 2026-02-13T14:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@ap_hanley What that I was there and understood what happened lol It's the entire reason BTC won over Bcash. Bcash had the most nodes and the miners behind it. The economic activity and liquidity of BTC forced everyone to bend the knee out of self interest That's what economic node means" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022312741277475066) 2026-02-13T14:11Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@LiliH65289916 Sure if you want to identify with the small slice of technical users who do approve BIP110 that's fine. I said "almost" for a reason there are some. But it's not that many compared to everyone else who sides with BTC" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022313210255176002) 2026-02-13T14:13Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@ap_hanley You'd be happier in BCH land" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022331447689052193) 2026-02-13T15:26Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@stepnoy385394 Spam is not an existential problem for Bitcoin. It is objectively within consensus. They are valid transactions. It's your claim that it is an existential threat demonstrate that it is" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022351000192086311) 2026-02-13T16:43Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@stepnoy385394 You don't understand what consensus is then. Everyone running software interacting with the Bitcoin network is in consensus. It's formed voluntarily via the code you run" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022417669060989270) 2026-02-13T21:08Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@ap_hanley You didn't answer my question and are saying I have ulterior (nefarious) motives rather than answering simple questions about history. Economic nodes =/ big Economic nodes are the users of the network. If you receive and send coins the rules you use matter" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022428204762599872) 2026-02-13T21:50Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@ap_hanley I don't think you're interested in learning about how Bitcoin works. You're a minority attempting a hostile takeover of our network based on emotions and anger. If you are interested in how Bitcoin works you should start by actually learning about what happened in 2017" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022428737888022754) 2026-02-13T21:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@stepnoy385394 I don't know what to say other than you're angry Bitcoin is something that you don't want it to be. You're welcome to fork and make your own rules. No one is obligated to agree with you or follow you but you can try. That's how voluntary systems work" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022426675913654591) 2026-02-13T21:44Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "My only regret is my meme $58k limit order I set several years ago didn't get filled overnight. If $59.8k really was the bottom I'm going to be so mad lol" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2019718774874915105) 2026-02-06T10:24Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "Hey @Strike @jackmallers - I'm getting real tired of giving people my Strike address or a QR code and they tell me over and over it doesn't work or is invalid. Any ideas why" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2019822637783097626) 2026-02-06T17:16Z [----] followers, [----] engagements "Tiiiimmmmbbbeeeerrrrrrrr Dead cat bounce looking pretty likely lads" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2020869637710151778) 2026-02-09T14:37Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "Thank god the [--] am slam was crap today lol" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2020904601474535616) 2026-02-09T16:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "DCA still chugging along in the background scooping up sats. In ten years very likely we won't care whether it was a $62k or $72k buy. The hard part is waiting. The wait the last [--] years has been painful. Hopefully smoother skies ahead" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021200797770375544) 2026-02-10T12:33Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "Twitter plebs parading their ignorance of how the fork wars actually played out is embarrassing doubly so for those who were around at the time. Spinning up empty AWS nodes is pointless. The war was over whether the users or the miners decided the rules" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021204050881151131) 2026-02-10T12:46Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "Helpful hint: a user is someone who receives and sends coins does economic activity and whose node defines which coins and rules are real. Simply having a box in your closet doesn't add any weight to that" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021204324194349547) 2026-02-10T12:47Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "People on twitter don't define BTC. BTC definition is formed via consensus from ALL network users. Twitter polls and bots liking things won't change that. This will be a painful lesson for BIP110 people when it fails to activate. There will be a push to fork off. Don't follow" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021215455575257362) 2026-02-10T13:31Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "BIP110 logic: "if you are against BIP110 you are pro spam" Toddler logic: "if you feed me broccoli you hate me"" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021332597364891854) 2026-02-10T21:17Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "NGU technology broken. Has been replaced by PGD Price Go Down" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021550244157349966) 2026-02-11T11:41Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "Everyone would be better off focusing on other things. Consensus valid spam transactions are annoying but they are currently Bitcoin. Making them "not Bitcoin" is going to be more costly than the benefit is worth by a lot. I don't like the spam but I've yet to see a solution" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021919972092747990) 2026-02-12T12:11Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "Me losing the will to live arguing with BIP110 enjoyers who don't understand basic Bitcoin (BTC) consensus mechanisms or technicals. Sad state of affairs we're back to having to say BTC is Bitcoin" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021925821686906951) 2026-02-12T12:34Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "I crave death at this point Bitcoin is so floppy flaccid and sloppy and I have my entire net worth in it lol Bitcoin finally picked which of today's crashing asset classes to correlate to Bitcoin finally picked which of today's crashing asset classes to correlate to" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021981952174432260) 2026-02-12T16:17Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@CPepetricio @hodlonaut lol I did read it. It says it activates at 55% before a certain block height. Hey @grok check this repository on GitHub And then tell us: does the fork automatically activate at a certain block height even if 55% signal isn't achieved https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0110.mediawiki https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0110.mediawiki" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022068145301979613) 2026-02-12T21:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CPepetricio @hodlonaut @grok You're just wrong there's no other way to say it. Are you an idiot or delusional Why would you even want it to activate automatically with less than 55% support you do understand that it would either create orphan blocks or a shitcoin right Right" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022074236496716007) 2026-02-12T22:24Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "These Knots/BIP110 people do not understand what happened in [----] and do not understand the Bitcoin network. @HODLingOnward Using the term economic node is always such a tell @HODLingOnward Using the term economic node is always such a tell" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022312908776993099) 2026-02-13T14:12Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@beeforbacon1 Focusing on the important things this bear market i see. Nice" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022418336567734469) 2026-02-13T21:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@stepnoy385394 This is you bro You are welcome to fork off at any time if you don't like the rules of the Bitcoin network. No one is forcing you to be here or to run any particular code. It's your choice. https://youtu.be/pKHl5FrvScEsi=oFXkkBiY2J772OZo https://youtu.be/pKHl5FrvScEsi=oFXkkBiY2J772OZo" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022432460966105188) 2026-02-13T22:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "Classic video that perfectly encapsulates the BIP110 movement: https://youtu.be/pKHl5FrvScEsi=oFXkkBiY2J772OZo https://youtu.be/pKHl5FrvScEsi=oFXkkBiY2J772OZo" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022433570053300372) 2026-02-13T22:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@stepnoy385394 Knots plateaued at 20%. You're objectively acheiving nothing at all and the market is not following you. Make no mistake your choices are to bend the knee to BTC as Bitcoin or fork off. Make your choice and I hope you'll be wise" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022438149138395366) 2026-02-13T22:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@stepnoy385394 Do you not understand the word plateau Look you're the one coming off like a crusading religious nut. All I've been saying the entire time is you're free to run whatever code you like. No one has to agree with you. Personal choice. Sorry freedom offends you" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022449238827807144) 2026-02-13T23:14Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@stephanlivera @KLoaec @Princey21M BIP110 has unacceptable tradeoffs. In fact this is the entire crux of the anti-spam debate. The tradeoffs for every proposal made thus far to combat spam have been unacceptable and therefore will not and should not be adopted" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021533449304342771) 2026-02-11T10:35Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "BIP110 is going to get 20% of nodes signaling at best (based on current Knots node share) and I would be shocked if more than 10% of mined blocks signal for it (incentives matter). No economic nodes are currently in favour of BIP110. BIP110 is noise" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2021919399272124700) 2026-02-12T12:08Z [----] followers, [----] engagements "@ap_hanley @w_s_bitcoin Okay for the last time liquidity is ultimately what will decide. Your node only matters proportionally to how much weight it provides. That's not to say it isn't important just that if you want to influence Bitcoin consensus you need overwhelming support for change" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022955617489657901) 2026-02-15T08:46Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "It's been wild to watch @hodlonaut's recent transformation. I genuinely do not think he realises what's happened to him. Make no mistake he is amplifying the same exact impulse that lead to BCH and I do believe the BIP110 movement will birth a shitcoin" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022240524229587407) 2026-02-13T09:24Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@ap_hanley @w_s_bitcoin Look if you don't understand that then I'm sorry to say you just do not understand Bitcoin" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022955738797420825) 2026-02-15T08:46Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "It's funny I don't talk to anyone except my spouse about Bitcoin. Twitter isn't real life. bitcoin might be the only thing in the world where its cultural value could go up if the people who loved it the most never opened their mouths bitcoin might be the only thing in the world where its cultural value could go up if the people who loved it the most never opened their mouths" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2020085509360611674) 2026-02-07T10:41Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@separ8 @hodlonaut @ToneVays @theonevortex The real crux of all this: core position is the filter wasn't preventing the spam but it was giving large miners an advantage in mining it. Raising the cap will make mining more fair. Reasonable anti-spam people: but we can try and make it expensive even if it can't be stopped" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022227676455743642) 2026-02-13T08:33Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@separ8 @hodlonaut @ToneVays @theonevortex BIP110 people: I want to force through a consensus level change (that actually won't prevent anything as a workaround has already been demonstrated) because I don't feel like technical Twitter users are sufficiently religious (either literally ala Luke or figuratively Maxi)" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022228115347681651) 2026-02-13T08:35Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@separ8 @hodlonaut @ToneVays @theonevortex @BitMEXResearch You seem confused about what Bitcoin is. Core is not Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a voluntary network made up of rules that everyone opts in to. As long as you're using the rules that make up Bitcoin you are on the network. You can choose to run whatever code you like" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022236617889526132) 2026-02-13T09:09Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "@separ8 @hodlonaut @ToneVays @theonevortex @BitMEXResearch Bitcoin is not a culture (though there are certain subcultures around Bitcoin). Bitcoin is rules. I promise this tiny detail is important. You're welcome to your personal concerns and theories around people who supply code and review to core. But you don't get to force them" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022237176839254035) 2026-02-13T09:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@CPepetricio @hodlonaut @grok @dathon_ohm LOL okay yeah I was wrong - I didn't see the part where it says it modified BIP9 framework and will activate at the block height regardless of signaling. This is fucking stupid. It either results in orphaned blocks or a shitcoin (depending on user preference)" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022238427358568629) 2026-02-13T09:16Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@LiliH65289916 Look I'll try and be kind. At best 20% of listening nodes want this fight. No economic nodes. Almost all technical people think this is stupid. The vast majority of the Bitcoin network is either hostile or indifferent to this. You either have to accept this or fork off" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022238937704747456) 2026-02-13T09:18Z [----] followers, [--] engagements "@BitcoinMotorist @w_s_bitcoin @alpacasw @CoinCornerDanny Ah yes the teeming masses of miners held back from expressing their as of yet unseen overwhelming desire to signal for BIP110 lol" [X Link](https://x.com/HODLingOnward/status/2022958650168693076) 2026-02-15T08:58Z [----] followers, [--] engagements Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing
@HODLingOnward Hodl Onward 🔑
Hodl Onward 🔑 posts on X about bitcoin, hodl, if you, the most the most. They currently have [-----] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [---] engagements in the last [--] hours.
Engagements: [---] #
- [--] Week [-----] +48%
- [--] Month [------] +429%
- [--] Months [------] +200%
- [--] Year [------] +50%
Mentions: [--] #
- [--] Week [---] +171%
- [--] Month [---] +2,300%
- [--] Months [---] +138%
- [--] Year [---] +78%
Followers: [-----] #
- [--] Week [-----] +0.53%
- [--] Month [-----] +1.40%
- [--] Months [-----] +0.90%
- [--] Year [-----] +3.20%
CreatorRank: [---------] #
Social Influence
Social category influence finance 86.49% cryptocurrencies 52.25% technology brands 7.21% social networks 5.41% vc firms #508 exchanges 0.9% stocks 0.9% countries 0.9% travel destinations 0.9%
Social topic influence bitcoin 43.24%, hodl #280, if you 10.81%, the most 7.21%, network #2829, spam #1340, twitter 5.41%, bch #507, matter 4.5%, you dont 4.5%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @hodlonaut @oomahq @stepnoy385394 @catotheelder17 @cpepetricio @flytheelephant1 @stephanlivera @wsbitcoin @swaaalla @rektsorekt @axexang @conza @ap_hanley @pledditor @separ8 @tonevays @theonevortex @aphanley @w_s_bitcoin @nvk
Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) Coinbase Global Inc. (COIN)
Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours
"@Pledditor What do you think the ticker will be for our airdrop My bet is BTH for Bitcoin Holy"
X Link 2026-01-29T14:55Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@LukeDashjr @GrassFedBitcoin What are you going to call your shitfork Bitcoin Holy What's your ticker going to be BTH"
X Link 2026-02-05T16:19Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"So Luke blocked me like a little bitch after saying "no ur the fork" which is either evidence Luke is stupid (unlikely) oorrrr that guy is absolutely the next Gavin aka a liar who wants to pump his own shitfork coin. I think his goal is to establish BTH You have all been warned"
X Link 2026-02-05T16:31Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@freddienew @bitcoinhodlco Where ya headed I detect a distinct lack of stagdoos on that flight. I thought easyJet only flew to ibizia lol"
X Link 2026-02-06T09:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@TheStalwart Miners often have fixed contracts for electricity price. If Bitcoin mining gives the most return the miners are on. If a different use of the electricity gives a better return the miners get turned off. It's pretty simple"
X Link 2026-02-06T11:33Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@hodlonaut @oomahq Genuine question for you guys. What happens/what do you do when this contentious fork doesn't activate any time soon likely at all"
X Link 2026-02-06T16:36Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@oomahq @hodlonaut See this is the part I don't get you want to fight contention with even more contention. BIP110 is objectively unpopular (2% of nodes 0% miners) I don't like the spam at all I think it's a shitty externality and would prefer it is gone. But BIP110 is fucking stupid"
X Link 2026-02-06T16:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@oomahq @hodlonaut I fail to see how 55% is an appropriate level of consensus. It is deliberatly hostile"
X Link 2026-02-06T17:01Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@oomahq @hodlonaut Vile. Will never run this shit. The good news is no one else will either. BIP110 is a fucking amazing own goal. I potentially would have been aligned to a consensus change to deal with the non-financial data but definitely not BIP110 and definitely not with only 55%"
X Link 2026-02-06T17:09Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@freddienew @bitcoinhodlco @CoinCornerMolly Enjoy the easyJet to magaluf my friend 🫡"
X Link 2026-02-06T19:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@BtcLiberty @hodlonaut @oomahq What the fuck. Taproot wasn't contentious and a great example of how things -should- work with consensus and careful coordination What you're advocating would break lightning lol Also LOL at "if our contentious change isn't adopted MORE extreme measures" as if that would work"
X Link 2026-02-07T11:57Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut I disagree obviously I can't prove what's going to happen in the future but I absolutely feel a chain split coming. There will never be consensus behind Luke and Co nor their proposals because a) not good from a technical perspective and b) they've burned too many bridges"
X Link 2026-02-07T12:06Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut This will end up going the separate chain route BTC is Bitcoin and BTC is the longest chain with the most work. There is no universe in which 95%+ of the current network flips. That leaves two paths: -fruitless forever waste of effort to change BTC; or -a minority chain split"
X Link 2026-02-07T12:08Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut I hope for your sake you stick with BTC instead of following Luke off into the shitcoin wilderness"
X Link 2026-02-07T12:09Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut You're correct about the -intent- of a soft fork. Intend and design do not guarantee outcomes that is why extremely high coordination and consensus is sought for successful soft forks. Two chains can result from this due to low coordination and consensus. Intent =/ outcome"
X Link 2026-02-07T12:18Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut Beside that my prediction is that BIP110 will fail to do anything and then some will pivot to desiring a chain split due to being unable to force through the desired outcome. There will be an evolution. You guys are going down the path of eventually abandoning BTC"
X Link 2026-02-07T12:21Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut 55% isn't consensus and coordination it's a hostile takeover"
X Link 2026-02-07T12:32Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@oomahq @rektsorekt @hodlonaut You have step outside yourself for a second - all of the BCH people similarly were of the opinion that they were the most hardcore original Satoshi disciple bitcoiners too"
X Link 2026-02-07T12:33Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@notgrubles @knutsvanholm And with 55% it's a hostile takeover attempt rather than a good faith proposal for acheiving actual soft fork consensus. It's bullshit"
X Link 2026-02-08T15:19Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@LPCapitalChi Sounds like the perfect time for a HELOC or personal loan to buy Bitcoin lol Congrats big milestone"
X Link 2026-02-08T15:57Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@PeterMcCormack You do have some pretty shit people on your discount Joe Rogan show and people are allowed to be upset about that. Freedom cuts both ways we are all free to call it thus"
X Link 2026-02-09T08:54Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@axexang @nvk If someone spins up [--] BIP110 nodes in AWS that doesn't matter. It's the -users- of the network who matter. Those who use the coins determine the rules they want to follow whether that's merchants exchanges or holders of coins. Miners follow the economic activity (fees)"
X Link 2026-02-09T15:19Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@stephanlivera @MrHodl Given my cold card has never been connected to another device and I generated the keys myself with dice that would be quite the malware attack 😁"
X Link 2026-02-09T15:36Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@axexang @nvk Christ. Capital is a) funding development b) social capital in building consensus c) people willing to back a side during a fork All of that today is overwhelmingly behind BTC. BIP110 will fail. Your choice will then be BTC or "BTH - Bitcoin Holy by Luke" if they fork"
X Link 2026-02-09T15:55Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@axexang @nvk My son you sound exactly like a BSVer. The white paper is a great artefact as part of Bitcoin's history but it is not a governance document nor is it holy. Bitcoin is what we the network make of it through consensus and code"
X Link 2026-02-09T16:01Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@axexang @nvk All of you Knots BIP110 people seem to think likes on Twitter and empty AWS nodes will allow your minority to steamroll the Bitcoin protocol. People like NVK and myself who understand how forks and network coordination work are trying to warn you so you don't make a mistake"
X Link 2026-02-09T16:03Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@axexang @nvk A shitcoin is anything that isn't BTC. That's the real Bitcoin. You'd fit in well with the BSV crowd"
X Link 2026-02-09T16:53Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@NEEDcreations @w_s_bitcoin You'll have less hash than BSV in that case lol"
X Link 2026-02-10T16:09Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@w_s_bitcoin I think BIP110 is supposed to activate once 55% of blocks during a difficulty period have been mined with signal active so in theory they are aiming for "majority" hashrate from the get go. The point is they'll never get close to that amount"
X Link 2026-02-10T16:11Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@sion6EQUJ5 @Co2Money @w_s_bitcoin First of all it will be called Bitcoin Holy and it will use ticket BTH. We can meme it that way and it will be so. The chain must be scrubbed of unholy material after all. Second it won't do anything to BTC because the economic incentives and past history show it won't"
X Link 2026-02-11T14:05Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@heavilyarmedc BIP110 shitfork known as Bitcoin Holy - only godly and Pope Luke approved material on chain. Ticker BTH"
X Link 2026-02-11T14:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@Pledditor Bitcoin Holy (BTH) is what we should call the BIP110 chain when it fails to activate and they fork off. It'll be the clean pure chain scrubbed of unholy material as determined by his Holiness Pope Luke I"
X Link 2026-02-11T14:19Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CatoTheElder17 @Pledditor Why would BTC need to do anything It is the longest chain with the most work and all the economic nodes use it I think you may be confused about what Bitcoin is and you are proving my point. BTH will fit in great with BCH and BSV as another minority chain with dumb rules"
X Link 2026-02-11T14:28Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CatoTheElder17 @Pledditor Or maybe you can't read and you missed the part where I said "when BIP110 fails to activate" - it (deservedly) has no hope of activation. At that point you Bitcoin Holy people will need to choose: stick with BTC or fork. Choose wisely"
X Link 2026-02-11T14:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@JoeCarlasare @TuurDemeester At a certain point we may need explore alternatives"
X Link 2026-02-11T14:56Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@separ8 @ToneVays @Beautyon_ Ah yes that age old principle of Bitcoin proof of node rather than proof of work. The valid chain is the longest one with the most work. Do you guys even understand the basics of why BTC is Bitcoin and BCH and BSV are not lol"
X Link 2026-02-11T15:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@hodlonaut That's great you're free to run whatever code you want. As long as knots stays in consensus it is a Bitcoin client. Be careful your node may adopt rules that aren't Bitcoin (BTC) at some point in the future. Don't make the mistake of updating to a different consensus regime"
X Link 2026-02-11T15:17Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@CatoTheElder17 @stephanlivera @swaaalla BTC won the first fork war and we will win this one again. The capital the technical ability the economic nodes are all behind BTC as Bitcoin. If you don't want to understand or learn the history of what -actually- happened in [----] we can't help you"
X Link 2026-02-11T15:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CatoTheElder17 @Pledditor I'll save this and we can compare notes in October. Don't fuck this up. BTC is Bitcoin"
X Link 2026-02-11T16:39Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@BitcoinMotorist @w_s_bitcoin When you say "they work" what does that look like specifically. Do they prevent inscriptions or ordinals Do they make them more expensive What's the success criteria you're describing"
X Link 2026-02-11T17:01Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@thetrocro I've been spotting this stuff in my job it's all the same with the same voice and patterns. It's definitely made me think less of certain people. There's a big difference between sifting through data faster and going "hey bot write my job outputs for me make no mistakes""
X Link 2026-02-11T17:14Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CatoTheElder17 @stephanlivera @swaaalla You've got this wrong buddy. The lesson of [----] isn't "broad bad tighten good" The lesson is DON'T fork unless you have the overwhelming economic majority. Also I see your rhetorical fallacious question and choose to ignore it. Try again"
X Link 2026-02-11T17:41Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CatoTheElder17 @stephanlivera @swaaalla It doesn't sound like you were around then. Things were fluid The reason BTC won is because -at the moment the fork happened- the liquidity remained with the legacy chain no one adopted the hard fork. People adopted segwit. The economics followed this and miners bent the knee"
X Link 2026-02-11T18:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@BitcoinMotorist I mean coinbase is the exchange of choice for shitcoiners so it's understandable"
X Link 2026-02-11T18:17Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@swaaalla @AdamSimecka Bitcoin Holy brought to you by His Holiness Pope Luke I. Now with 2-week next block times"
X Link 2026-02-11T20:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CatoTheElder17 @swaaalla @stephanlivera And again if that bothers you no one is forcing you to run Bitcoin code or use it you are absolutely free to discontinue use if you find it morally objectionable to run that code. Or you can fork off. But your view is absolutely a minority view at best"
X Link 2026-02-11T21:44Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CatoTheElder17 @swaaalla @stephanlivera All conjecture. May be true likely isn't - there's no proof of any kind Immaterial to the technical argument Again if you find Bitcoin to be morally objectionable you are free to modify the software and run whatever code you want. We don't need to recognise your rules though"
X Link 2026-02-11T22:06Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@hodlonaut @iohewifh5934 Mate none of this is objective everything you've said is subjective. Bitcoin is ultimately a system of open source code. You're making claims about what the code ultimately does without showing what pieces of code do those things. Emotional. Very unserious"
X Link 2026-02-12T08:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CPepetricio @hodlonaut Let me get this straight. I'm supposed to understand your own personal secret unspoken definition of consensus in Bitcoin which is completely different to the actual definition. I'm just calling balls and strikes buddy sorry reality hurts you"
X Link 2026-02-12T09:24Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@PeterMcCormack @johnsguitarpage Can you articulate what legislative changes you want to existing immigration law This is all vibes based nonsense"
X Link 2026-02-12T09:26Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@Conza @hodlonaut @iohewifh5934 Run the code or don't buddy. Bitcoin is BTC"
X Link 2026-02-12T09:26Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CPepetricio @hodlonaut Is BTC the longest chain with the most work that accepts Taproot and segwit as part of consensus yes or no. If yes (hint that's the correct answer) then it is within consensus. BIP110 does not have consensus. It has minority support amongst the network"
X Link 2026-02-12T09:41Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut That is not how forks work dude. Chains do not delete themselves lol if you don't understand how Bitcoin works I think it might be wise to do some research so that you understand the dynamics here I'm trying to warn you that you're making a technical mistake based on ideology"
X Link 2026-02-12T09:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut The other critical thing - you're expecting even requiring huge levels of preparation and change from lots of entities (black rock for IBIT Strategy for their Treasury etc.) where's the economic momentum today: behind the decade plus of infrastructure in place for BTC"
X Link 2026-02-12T10:05Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut Consensus change in the modern BTC era is expensive both literally and in terms of social capital. You're all emotionally invested in making a change that a) won't actually do anything to prevent spam (maybe more expensive at best) b) could break lots of things c) (cont'd)"
X Link 2026-02-12T10:14Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut c) will spend all stored social capital on forking there will be no second opportunity for a contentious fork in this era after this one due to fatigue cost etc. We need to keep that social capital in reserve for quantum"
X Link 2026-02-12T10:15Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut You're mad the overwhelming majority of Bitcoin users do not agree with your mempool policy so you're attempting to change Bitcoin consensus. Unless you have overwhelming agreement and coordination for that consensus change you will find yourself on a minority fork chain"
X Link 2026-02-12T10:49Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@FlyTheElephant1 @hodlonaut The latest version sure. No one is forced to upgrade. And I'm pretty sure (just guessing) Luke doesn't have a lever to magically turn all previous versions of knots into BIP110 signaling by default"
X Link 2026-02-12T11:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@Bitcoin_Teddy Nah been hearing this since [----]. No crash has ever materialised. People have waited and died while waiting for this alleged future housing crash"
X Link 2026-02-12T14:05Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@SpectrGen @monsterbitar @hodlonaut You're the Bcasher in this scenario buddy lol BIP110 is never going to activate. Knots couldn't even breach 20% of listening nodes. How on earth is your minority going to convince anyone to support this Economic nodes are all behind BTC as Bitcoin. Sorry that offends you"
X Link 2026-02-12T15:14Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@SpectrGen @monsterbitar @hodlonaut Irrelevant. Economic nodes are what matter. There is no current demand for this proposal except zealots on Twitter"
X Link 2026-02-12T15:26Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@MrHodl I kinda get where they're all coming from reference client defaults tend to be blindly adopted via standard upgrade paths and default configs are rarely edited. The bit they miss is that consensus valid transactions no matter how stupid are Bitcoin"
X Link 2026-02-12T15:28Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CapitalSatoshi Enjoy Bitcoin Holy (BTH) when you inevitably fork off to establish the Real Maxi Bitcoin then I guess. BIP110 is never activating. I hope for your sake you stick with BTC"
X Link 2026-02-12T16:15Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@w_s_bitcoin @notgrubles @MrHodl We should get an office bet pool going on this"
X Link 2026-02-12T21:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@stepnoy385394 Do you really think El Salvador is considering divesting it's BTC because there's extra data in blocks"
X Link 2026-02-13T08:13Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@Conza @hodlonaut @iohewifh5934 Are you saying BTC isn't Bitcoin"
X Link 2026-02-13T08:18Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@Conza @hodlonaut @iohewifh5934 You seem to think you're entitled to force people to run the code you want. People all users hold that Bitcoin has [--] million coins no more. It's trivial to fix something like that since everyone will demand a fix. BIP110 has no meaningful support. It is out of consensus"
X Link 2026-02-13T09:04Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@separ8 @hodlonaut @ToneVays @theonevortex @BitMEXResearch That sounds like the sort of thing a Bcasher would say. BTC is Bitcoin. If you use BTC's rules you are a bitcoiner. If you adopt alternative rules you are not running Bitcoin Be very careful that Knots doesn't rugpull you by causing a chainsplit. It won't today. But pay attn"
X Link 2026-02-13T14:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@ap_hanley What that I was there and understood what happened lol It's the entire reason BTC won over Bcash. Bcash had the most nodes and the miners behind it. The economic activity and liquidity of BTC forced everyone to bend the knee out of self interest That's what economic node means"
X Link 2026-02-13T14:11Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@LiliH65289916 Sure if you want to identify with the small slice of technical users who do approve BIP110 that's fine. I said "almost" for a reason there are some. But it's not that many compared to everyone else who sides with BTC"
X Link 2026-02-13T14:13Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@ap_hanley You'd be happier in BCH land"
X Link 2026-02-13T15:26Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@stepnoy385394 Spam is not an existential problem for Bitcoin. It is objectively within consensus. They are valid transactions. It's your claim that it is an existential threat demonstrate that it is"
X Link 2026-02-13T16:43Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@stepnoy385394 You don't understand what consensus is then. Everyone running software interacting with the Bitcoin network is in consensus. It's formed voluntarily via the code you run"
X Link 2026-02-13T21:08Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@ap_hanley You didn't answer my question and are saying I have ulterior (nefarious) motives rather than answering simple questions about history. Economic nodes =/ big Economic nodes are the users of the network. If you receive and send coins the rules you use matter"
X Link 2026-02-13T21:50Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@ap_hanley I don't think you're interested in learning about how Bitcoin works. You're a minority attempting a hostile takeover of our network based on emotions and anger. If you are interested in how Bitcoin works you should start by actually learning about what happened in 2017"
X Link 2026-02-13T21:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@stepnoy385394 I don't know what to say other than you're angry Bitcoin is something that you don't want it to be. You're welcome to fork and make your own rules. No one is obligated to agree with you or follow you but you can try. That's how voluntary systems work"
X Link 2026-02-13T21:44Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"My only regret is my meme $58k limit order I set several years ago didn't get filled overnight. If $59.8k really was the bottom I'm going to be so mad lol"
X Link 2026-02-06T10:24Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"Hey @Strike @jackmallers - I'm getting real tired of giving people my Strike address or a QR code and they tell me over and over it doesn't work or is invalid. Any ideas why"
X Link 2026-02-06T17:16Z [----] followers, [----] engagements
"Tiiiimmmmbbbeeeerrrrrrrr Dead cat bounce looking pretty likely lads"
X Link 2026-02-09T14:37Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"Thank god the [--] am slam was crap today lol"
X Link 2026-02-09T16:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"DCA still chugging along in the background scooping up sats. In ten years very likely we won't care whether it was a $62k or $72k buy. The hard part is waiting. The wait the last [--] years has been painful. Hopefully smoother skies ahead"
X Link 2026-02-10T12:33Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"Twitter plebs parading their ignorance of how the fork wars actually played out is embarrassing doubly so for those who were around at the time. Spinning up empty AWS nodes is pointless. The war was over whether the users or the miners decided the rules"
X Link 2026-02-10T12:46Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"Helpful hint: a user is someone who receives and sends coins does economic activity and whose node defines which coins and rules are real. Simply having a box in your closet doesn't add any weight to that"
X Link 2026-02-10T12:47Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"People on twitter don't define BTC. BTC definition is formed via consensus from ALL network users. Twitter polls and bots liking things won't change that. This will be a painful lesson for BIP110 people when it fails to activate. There will be a push to fork off. Don't follow"
X Link 2026-02-10T13:31Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"BIP110 logic: "if you are against BIP110 you are pro spam" Toddler logic: "if you feed me broccoli you hate me""
X Link 2026-02-10T21:17Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"NGU technology broken. Has been replaced by PGD Price Go Down"
X Link 2026-02-11T11:41Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"Everyone would be better off focusing on other things. Consensus valid spam transactions are annoying but they are currently Bitcoin. Making them "not Bitcoin" is going to be more costly than the benefit is worth by a lot. I don't like the spam but I've yet to see a solution"
X Link 2026-02-12T12:11Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"Me losing the will to live arguing with BIP110 enjoyers who don't understand basic Bitcoin (BTC) consensus mechanisms or technicals. Sad state of affairs we're back to having to say BTC is Bitcoin"
X Link 2026-02-12T12:34Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"I crave death at this point Bitcoin is so floppy flaccid and sloppy and I have my entire net worth in it lol Bitcoin finally picked which of today's crashing asset classes to correlate to Bitcoin finally picked which of today's crashing asset classes to correlate to"
X Link 2026-02-12T16:17Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@CPepetricio @hodlonaut lol I did read it. It says it activates at 55% before a certain block height. Hey @grok check this repository on GitHub And then tell us: does the fork automatically activate at a certain block height even if 55% signal isn't achieved https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0110.mediawiki https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0110.mediawiki"
X Link 2026-02-12T21:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CPepetricio @hodlonaut @grok You're just wrong there's no other way to say it. Are you an idiot or delusional Why would you even want it to activate automatically with less than 55% support you do understand that it would either create orphan blocks or a shitcoin right Right"
X Link 2026-02-12T22:24Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"These Knots/BIP110 people do not understand what happened in [----] and do not understand the Bitcoin network. @HODLingOnward Using the term economic node is always such a tell @HODLingOnward Using the term economic node is always such a tell"
X Link 2026-02-13T14:12Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@beeforbacon1 Focusing on the important things this bear market i see. Nice"
X Link 2026-02-13T21:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@stepnoy385394 This is you bro You are welcome to fork off at any time if you don't like the rules of the Bitcoin network. No one is forcing you to be here or to run any particular code. It's your choice. https://youtu.be/pKHl5FrvScEsi=oFXkkBiY2J772OZo https://youtu.be/pKHl5FrvScEsi=oFXkkBiY2J772OZo"
X Link 2026-02-13T22:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"Classic video that perfectly encapsulates the BIP110 movement: https://youtu.be/pKHl5FrvScEsi=oFXkkBiY2J772OZo https://youtu.be/pKHl5FrvScEsi=oFXkkBiY2J772OZo"
X Link 2026-02-13T22:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@stepnoy385394 Knots plateaued at 20%. You're objectively acheiving nothing at all and the market is not following you. Make no mistake your choices are to bend the knee to BTC as Bitcoin or fork off. Make your choice and I hope you'll be wise"
X Link 2026-02-13T22:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@stepnoy385394 Do you not understand the word plateau Look you're the one coming off like a crusading religious nut. All I've been saying the entire time is you're free to run whatever code you like. No one has to agree with you. Personal choice. Sorry freedom offends you"
X Link 2026-02-13T23:14Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@stephanlivera @KLoaec @Princey21M BIP110 has unacceptable tradeoffs. In fact this is the entire crux of the anti-spam debate. The tradeoffs for every proposal made thus far to combat spam have been unacceptable and therefore will not and should not be adopted"
X Link 2026-02-11T10:35Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"BIP110 is going to get 20% of nodes signaling at best (based on current Knots node share) and I would be shocked if more than 10% of mined blocks signal for it (incentives matter). No economic nodes are currently in favour of BIP110. BIP110 is noise"
X Link 2026-02-12T12:08Z [----] followers, [----] engagements
"@ap_hanley @w_s_bitcoin Okay for the last time liquidity is ultimately what will decide. Your node only matters proportionally to how much weight it provides. That's not to say it isn't important just that if you want to influence Bitcoin consensus you need overwhelming support for change"
X Link 2026-02-15T08:46Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"It's been wild to watch @hodlonaut's recent transformation. I genuinely do not think he realises what's happened to him. Make no mistake he is amplifying the same exact impulse that lead to BCH and I do believe the BIP110 movement will birth a shitcoin"
X Link 2026-02-13T09:24Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@ap_hanley @w_s_bitcoin Look if you don't understand that then I'm sorry to say you just do not understand Bitcoin"
X Link 2026-02-15T08:46Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"It's funny I don't talk to anyone except my spouse about Bitcoin. Twitter isn't real life. bitcoin might be the only thing in the world where its cultural value could go up if the people who loved it the most never opened their mouths bitcoin might be the only thing in the world where its cultural value could go up if the people who loved it the most never opened their mouths"
X Link 2026-02-07T10:41Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@separ8 @hodlonaut @ToneVays @theonevortex The real crux of all this: core position is the filter wasn't preventing the spam but it was giving large miners an advantage in mining it. Raising the cap will make mining more fair. Reasonable anti-spam people: but we can try and make it expensive even if it can't be stopped"
X Link 2026-02-13T08:33Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@separ8 @hodlonaut @ToneVays @theonevortex BIP110 people: I want to force through a consensus level change (that actually won't prevent anything as a workaround has already been demonstrated) because I don't feel like technical Twitter users are sufficiently religious (either literally ala Luke or figuratively Maxi)"
X Link 2026-02-13T08:35Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@separ8 @hodlonaut @ToneVays @theonevortex @BitMEXResearch You seem confused about what Bitcoin is. Core is not Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a voluntary network made up of rules that everyone opts in to. As long as you're using the rules that make up Bitcoin you are on the network. You can choose to run whatever code you like"
X Link 2026-02-13T09:09Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"@separ8 @hodlonaut @ToneVays @theonevortex @BitMEXResearch Bitcoin is not a culture (though there are certain subcultures around Bitcoin). Bitcoin is rules. I promise this tiny detail is important. You're welcome to your personal concerns and theories around people who supply code and review to core. But you don't get to force them"
X Link 2026-02-13T09:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@CPepetricio @hodlonaut @grok @dathon_ohm LOL okay yeah I was wrong - I didn't see the part where it says it modified BIP9 framework and will activate at the block height regardless of signaling. This is fucking stupid. It either results in orphaned blocks or a shitcoin (depending on user preference)"
X Link 2026-02-13T09:16Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@LiliH65289916 Look I'll try and be kind. At best 20% of listening nodes want this fight. No economic nodes. Almost all technical people think this is stupid. The vast majority of the Bitcoin network is either hostile or indifferent to this. You either have to accept this or fork off"
X Link 2026-02-13T09:18Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
"@BitcoinMotorist @w_s_bitcoin @alpacasw @CoinCornerDanny Ah yes the teeming masses of miners held back from expressing their as of yet unseen overwhelming desire to signal for BIP110 lol"
X Link 2026-02-15T08:58Z [----] followers, [--] engagements
Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing