#  @GrayElf_ Paul Williams Paul Williams posts on X about israel, murder, hamas, russia the most. They currently have [-------] followers and [----] posts still getting attention that total [-------] engagements in the last [--] hours. ### Engagements: [-------] [#](/creator/twitter::977952834275561473/interactions)  - [--] Week [---------] +199% - [--] Month [---------] +426,536% - [--] Months [---------] +98,271% - [--] Year [---------] +1,299% ### Mentions: [--] [#](/creator/twitter::977952834275561473/posts_active)  - [--] Months [--] -76% - [--] Year [---] -79% ### Followers: [-------] [#](/creator/twitter::977952834275561473/followers)  - [--] Week [---] +0.26% - [--] Month [---] +7.20% - [--] Months [---] +3.20% - [--] Year [---] +23% ### CreatorRank: [---------] [#](/creator/twitter::977952834275561473/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [countries](/list/countries) [finance](/list/finance) [celebrities](/list/celebrities) [us election](/list/us-election) [technology brands](/list/technology-brands) [travel destinations](/list/travel-destinations) [stocks](/list/stocks) [social networks](/list/social-networks) [automotive brands](/list/automotive-brands) [musicians](/list/musicians) **Social topic influence** [israel](/topic/israel), [murder](/topic/murder), [hamas](/topic/hamas), [russia](/topic/russia), [ukraine](/topic/ukraine), [countries](/topic/countries), [in the](/topic/in-the), [australia](/topic/australia), [palestine](/topic/palestine), [epstein files](/topic/epstein-files) **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@sentdefender](/creator/undefined) [@edkrassen](/creator/undefined) [@osint613](/creator/undefined) [@allenanalysis](/creator/undefined) [@lawofruby](/creator/undefined) [@judgeluttig](/creator/undefined) [@patriottakes](/creator/undefined) [@tristansnell](/creator/undefined) [@thejackhopkins](/creator/undefined) [@kepi1107](/creator/undefined) [@kylegriffin1](/creator/undefined) [@jojofromjerz](/creator/undefined) [@beachhermit](/creator/undefined) [@tolddude](/creator/undefined) [@anthony60957284](/creator/undefined) [@onewokecitizen](/creator/undefined) [@calltoactivism](/creator/undefined) [@agentself99b](/creator/undefined) [@mari2025z](/creator/undefined) [@grok](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [Validity (VAL)](/topic/validity) [Shrapnel (SHRAP)](/topic/shrapnel) [Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)](/topic/tesla) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours "@BaddCompani Still zero criminal charges (except the historic fraud in NY) so nothing's sealed. We know he'd be convicted if he was ever charged but with garland's obstruction there's no reason to believe that will ever happen" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1660098240623304704) 2023-05-21T01:40Z [---] followers, [----] engagements "@BirgitC @ParkMargot61 @vcocozza76 @jamie_lashmar @PA How exactly does confetti disrupt the wedding I admit the technique was less than stellar but still just like you'd expect at a wedding - except most weddings actually have multiple guests" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1678443771657166857) 2023-07-10T16:39Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@tdwbi95 @charlesjblack @jamie_lashmar @PA So you actually know them There's so much total BS around this almost entirely manufactured outrage.including claims it was a JSO op when it all seems to be about her assumed mindset and motivation. Absolutely nothing there worthy of note other than the principals" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1678453236372578304) 2023-07-10T17:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@NWO_Covid_WW3 @Montecit0Pearl @jamie_lashmar @PA @RubyRedhead4 Thank you that's the ONLY hint of potential meaning I've run across. Now.was there any alleged meaning behind the orange confetti at Wimbledon" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1678454572547809307) 2023-07-10T17:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@JjinUk64 @JustStop_Oil A common wedding tradition - that you failed to challenge on any objective basis. The alleged beliefs of the guest in question do not change the fact that throwing confetti is both innocuous and expected at weddings" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1678460298959650816) 2023-07-10T17:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@LouiseMensch @randymot4 @GOP @TheDemocrats I'm not because only one of the two would actually have that intention regardless of any efforts to argue for more. The actual goal would be obstruction and & Dems cooperating to "fight" over a non-issue would fail to make real progress. Ukraine would lose that fight" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1678986820506517504) 2023-07-12T04:38Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@Olusola2762 @DavidSoulsby11 @btaychert @IAPonomarenko @NATO @POTUS @jensstoltenberg Is that why both Sweden and Finland were approved immediately because everyone rubber-stamped whatever the us said Except hungary took a lot of convincing and turkey probably needed to be "read the riot act" and threatened before they allowed Sweden in" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1679060205622140928) 2023-07-12T09:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Patriot_Lioness @OccupyDemocrats Your own comment makes clear that access granted by the state would NOT be a valid target for criminal investigation. Any objective view would be Thst Willis is looking at something very different and very illegal without any legitimacy" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1690953621654130688) 2023-08-14T05:08Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@CalynaHaunt So many "worst ever"s at the same time with Biden achieving some great things - but earning a place almost as bad for overseeing such a travesty. He's just too weak and mired in the past when "republicans" possessed some scintilla of good faith" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1694980070392365381) 2023-08-25T07:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@LooneeLuna @JasonOverstreet @johncusack And he's KEPT doing it because he wasn't indicted for so long. He KEEPS intimidating witnesses because he's never held accountable for it. And so on over and over and over" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1695408991629971603) 2023-08-26T12:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@RpsAgainstTrump Confirms the guilt of traitor trump but excuses nothing the false electors did. There is no conceivable excuse for lying and saying they were "duly elected" when they knew they weren't. (One state altered the template giving them a possible excuse.maybe.)" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1695417707125240233) 2023-08-26T12:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@tom_nevin @JoyceWhiteVance I expect it's (also) far more complex than that but at the most superficial level: increase valuations to get lower interest rates on loans; reduce valuations to pay less tax. Of course his valuatuons shouldn't be decisive but I did say more complex than that" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1697211709881205244) 2023-08-31T11:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@tomcblanton @JoyceWhiteVance Is that an honest question Seems unlikely but I'll bite. The banks could have lost money by offering lower interest rates than were justified just as the state might have lost money on property taxes. Even if the bankers were complicit that doesn't excuse the fraud" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1697213620579688471) 2023-08-31T11:43Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@JCBasinger @KenCox @harrylitman @acoyne @realDonaldTrump @JennaEllisEsq He had the chance and he repeatedly failed to meet his legal obligations. He ALSO conceded that he did in fact do the things he's being sued for (which was pretty well undeniable anyway) but still wanted to pretend he wasn't responsible for what he said and did. He chose this" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1697220903422275752) 2023-08-31T12:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@iNCNF @ReallyAmerican1 Well you're about a third right - there is a huge conflict.between her desire to uphold the law and his obsession with breaking them. But that's the conflict courts exist for so it's a meaningless point to make" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1701434944072155340) 2023-09-12T03:17Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@NORSTRAT @JabbaNoBadda @BuddShenkin While I tend to agree there's more to it than that. There's a great deal of propaganda misrepresenting these people as WORTHY of praise when they are more worthy of condemnation - at least the first two. I'm expecting Smith will turn out the same just hasn't happened yet" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1702974947197673701) 2023-09-16T09:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@korzk1019 @dsamuelsohn Forget about what the banks did - it's illegal for him to lie to them. End of story. Fraud is not about the recipient's due diligence it's about the provider of the information's dishonesty" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1707866524298723693) 2023-09-29T21:14Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@FrankZYerbouti @AlterEgon75 @RepMeijer @billyez2 Actually they aren't - even if COMPONENTS of those systems are indeed standard. Just look at the other photos showing signs describing a [--] delay on the emergency doors that weren't in the CCTV still. Even if the alarm handle was standard the doors obviously weren't" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1708354120992817509) 2023-10-01T05:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@parrhizzia Avoiding a govt shutdown ISN'T though. You failed to identify any concrete benefit of the CR to them and it will probably see McCarthy removed. Fallacy is a fallacy - see how useless that argument is Even if it's true this time it demonstrates nothing" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1708389527776281017) 2023-10-01T07:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@fuddlored @AlanMcQuinn @twobitidiot @JakeSherman Good point but very backwards - the gop controlled committee released the still from the security cameras but by your "logic" - they will never release the full video because it will show his confused attempts to open the door. What a pathetic effort at trolling" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1708786657636524155) 2023-10-02T10:11Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@SueBailey677 @ChrisDWilk @Angry_Staffer @AskLyft @davidrisher @lyft It looks like they did finally and managed to find Tux alive and relatively well. But they could have handled it much better and much sooner" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1708887596577996824) 2023-10-02T16:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@BensleyDanny @Carolin33390348 @HansonRitta @kylegriffin1 That's NOT what fraud is it's him lying to them" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1708917027405197483) 2023-10-02T18:49Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@ColoradoOhio @KarlFNoel @mrusk745 @JakeSherman The CCTV still seems to have been leaked to Jake Sherman who posted it on twitter. That suggests the entire thing was a hit job run at shocking speed" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1708927622770720869) 2023-10-02T19:31Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@ColoradoOhio @KarlFNoel @mrusk745 @JakeSherman There's no video released - I was referring to the still image taken from the CCTV footage the one that we've all been seeing for the past day day and a half" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1708943308561711562) 2023-10-02T20:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@JamesClausner @ag2727 @brucemcintyre @lilwvredhead @OccupyDemocrats He's been found liable.isn't "convicted" limited to criminal charges" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1709495325537563020) 2023-10-04T09:07Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@julesrodrigo @karlmil74490294 @williamlegate @pallee12 Thanks for clarifying the probable mechanism most of us don't deal with loans of that kind I know I don't" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1709893552212525297) 2023-10-05T11:29Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@ber46899118 @GenghisJon1 @williamlegate And obviously dragging Tesla down in the process. I believe spacex is private so there's no stock market to reflect on its trajectory. Are there any metrics that could show success or otherwise there" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1709911056456531981) 2023-10-05T12:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@wisconsinlogic @newscollector08 @AC_Californian @TomJChicago I don't know the details of banking regulations but any that failed to do so should be penalised a large % of the loan value for failing to do do. Becomes a lot less profitable to look the other way. But of course I don't expect that to actually happen" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710164050355921285) 2023-10-06T05:24Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Sunshin27001268 @PrezLives2022 While an excellent point - he likely doesn't know which ones they got and which ones he was able to hide from them. Of course the whole concept of allowing him access to national security docs he isn't cleared for and is charged with stealing - seems to enable the crime" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710535279159976383) 2023-10-07T05:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@swart_dave @FordJohnathan5 Because spies aren't restricted to only looking for evidence they've already identified and shown probable cause that they can be found in specific places. The spies can just look and see what they find unlike the FBI - after all it was only national security at stake" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710550644292301049) 2023-10-07T07:00Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@rbpakawok @Mikessanders777 @MalcolmNance Funny how planning to go out to dinner with friends is legal but planning to overthrow the govt or sell national security secrets might just be considered SLIGHTLY more dubious. It's not there's any difference is there" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710554734774591709) 2023-10-07T07:16Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@1oldcrazylady @allenanalysis When does the failure to hold an enemy agent/asset accountable become more serious than "oh he has a card up his sleeve" How many years and unpunished crimes does it take to pull the wool from your eyes By which I'm referring specifically to the ones that passed the SoL" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710566146179809475) 2023-10-07T08:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@AbeDrayton @Ukrainolution @IAPonomarenko Interesting but obviously biased article. Israel has "gone to war against hamas" Or responded to massive terrorist attacks Israeli short-sightedness might provide some historical context - but they don't control hamas who must be held accountable for their actions" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710899868343103885) 2023-10-08T06:08Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@ManoolsAreCool @PonikvarMatt @ma20_ro @MerruX @IAPonomarenko And killing all Israelis/Jews is their explicitly stated reason for existence. Really doesn't leave any room for compromise and their repeated attacks ensure that Israel never leaves them alone. Provoking retaliation is their MO" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710907471987191912) 2023-10-08T06:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@PinkPan2121 @IAPonomarenko The parallel you're looking for would be Ukraine occupying russian territory after a counter-attack in response to invasion. gaza the west bank and the golan heights were occupied by Israel when they were invaded. gaza in particular never stops attacking. Total opposite" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710917188662751294) 2023-10-08T07:16Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@RoseSpitznogle @58isthenew40 @Angry_Staffer Baffling to see an encyclopaedia weighing in on current events in such detail but it is valuable. I think the 1000:1 prisoner swap and the reference to the wars starting with (hamas) rocket attacks rather highlight the discrepancies. Plus Egypt participate in that blockade" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710938727231725778) 2023-10-08T08:42Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@exileddub @Ilya_K_QST @58isthenew40 @stephanie9973 @Angry_Staffer Israel have no real choice faced by repeated terrorist attacks from hamas against civilians which is ALSO a war crime BTW and overshadows war crimes that might occur in retaliation. Even Egypt who invaded Israel in the past help blockade Gaza. That's really very telling" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710939338970910796) 2023-10-08T08:45Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@rana215797010 @58isthenew40 @Angry_Staffer And why is one of those borders so tightly secured by one of their previous allies Egypt were an invader of Israel with Syria and Jordan last century. Now they help blockade Gaza. Think it through" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710942808134275521) 2023-10-08T08:58Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@jstauf4316 @CraigRozniecki I could see this hurting bibi for exactly that reason. His attack on the supreme court for example doesn't tend to make him a unifying figure to rally around against hamas. More likely it will ensure Israeli unity around someone else. Maybe" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710952069220499829) 2023-10-08T09:35Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@SandyShriver9 It possible but after his assault on the supreme court he seems like the least likely candidate for Israelis to rally around. But the hamas attacks almost certainly will reunify Israel which begs the question - why wouldn't they wait as Israel got weaker" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710957488689078493) 2023-10-08T09:57Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@JJDragonFire @73RDARM @Cartier Wasn't it the Sims [--] My memory is a little vague" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1710978524780335161) 2023-10-08T11:20Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@dogefort @RealCynicalFox @nyn1naf0 Not sure that war weakened america to any significant extent. They don't learn well so they had a lot of lessons the taliban and others could teach them.but their domestic divisiveness hurts them far far more than any fight they've chosen on foreign soil" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1712012928722018619) 2023-10-11T07:51Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@gamblegrl19 @captkrispy @JasmineForUS @Redhaired_Jax And with an R in the chair there aren't even any floor votes that could result in a Jeffries win" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1712803318517690682) 2023-10-13T12:11Z [--] followers, [--] engagements "@Ustad102 @sentdefender Land they vacated a decade and a half ago followed by hamas taking over" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1713258548912873835) 2023-10-14T18:20Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@JordanDHeath @MohammadIsmae12 @marcgarlasco The hamas-allied group believed to have fired the rocket in question is called 'Palestinian Islamic Jihad' . Twitter encourages people to drop words or abbreviate which can introduce even more confusion" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1716364779420520680) 2023-10-23T08:03Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@k8sl8on @TonySamBoat @JakeSherman @RedheadRefined Which apartheid aspect of Israel are you referring to Arabs being able to vote there the only place in the middle east they can do so or having two Arabs on their supreme court Excluding those trying to destroy Israel isn't apartheid" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1725439292238180374) 2023-11-17T09:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@VellCal @PunishedAndhe @Angry_Staffer Amnesty also blamed Ukraine for russian human rights violations in their unjustified invasion of Ukraine - I'm sure there are reports like that but amnesty is not a credible source. Plus the whole trying to eliminate Israel thing - ignoring cause b/c of effect is wrong" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1725510967671640484) 2023-11-17T13:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@PunishedAndhe @VellCal @Angry_Staffer Sure.that's why the population keeps increasing and Palestinian terrorism has preceded it along with multiple invasions by multiple countries starting from the day Israel was born. Palestinians insist on the removal of Israeli settlements from Israeli land - ethnic cleansing" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1726143406324559977) 2023-11-19T07:40Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@VellCal @PunishedAndhe @Angry_Staffer And yet there was no country called Palestine prior to that. Ignoring reality to focus on only the narrow timeframe that doesn't quite support your bias doesn't make you right. And international law is one of the dishonest arguments used against Israel so it DOES matter" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1726177192181420100) 2023-11-19T09:54Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@debstehn @FordJohnathan5 How would it The facts have been established and the text of the amendment has been ignored to justify doing nothing in proclaiming that it doesn't apply to him. An appeal will refuse to reconsider the findings of fact but know at a glance that the findings of law are bogus" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1727075296841695566) 2023-11-21T21:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@MayaBug2016 @RpsAgainstTrump Tough luck I'm gunna "Like" it even if you tell me not to 😉" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1738101108948742590) 2023-12-22T07:36Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@TeitokuGou @MoSoApril2019 @MalcolmNance I think you mean something very different - I consider a colony to be somewhere populated by the colonisers not simply foreign controlled as some deem it. My country was largely populated by the British over a century before they took control of BMP after WW I" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1738735828854247631) 2023-12-24T01:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@SusanMorais @angryarab @orenbarsky Their populations apparently do - but their leaders largely want nothing to do with the destabilising palestinian cause nor invading Israel AGAIN to have their arses handed to them. Nuances" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1738743604217319706) 2023-12-24T02:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@gufypoopy @wwschmidt @migobril @orenbarsky That's a significant point as it relates to the only period in history that that was a country named palestine rather than simply a region under control of various empires over time" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1738744227776049611) 2023-12-24T02:11Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@gufypoopy @msonemic @wwschmidt @migobril @orenbarsky If you ever do expound on those details please drop a link. I'm only vaguely aware of them and appreciate honest info from people who really do know what they're talking about. In the interim I'll follow to try not to miss more of your in depth knowledge" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1738776445575688543) 2023-12-24T04:19Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@msonemic @gufypoopy @wwschmidt @migobril @orenbarsky Guided/smart bombs used in majority of Israeli strikes. Deliberately ignoring the reality for emotive misrepresentation. Supplies of guided munitions are limited forcing Israel to use judgement rather than exclusively pursuing the path you wish" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1738797881791062289) 2023-12-24T05:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@EdiMA_ @kyledcheney Those who made that determination need to be prosecuted for manslaughter or even murder. There is no possible (justified) protection against prosecution for wilfully and needlessly causing a person's death" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1743368244147491124) 2024-01-05T20:25Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@CalmUpset @twetienne7 @krassenstein @CantStopMeAgain He hid more than the nature of the operation as did his cohorts in the pentagon. He could easily have referred to a "(minor) medical procedure" without elaborating but hiding the facts from everyone including the prez is inexcusable. The prostate part is irrelevant" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1746334977556689349) 2024-01-14T00:54Z [--] followers, [--] engagements "@JayeJaybird54 That would require self awareness and integrity and consistency - not gunna happen" [X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1746713794620137869) 2024-01-15T01:59Z [--] followers, [--] engagements "@citrusnewsMO @bd_ecks @hahussain Fascinating detail - I've seen estimates that hamas militants made up around a third of the casualties but suspected it was higher. This provides evidence to support a 50%+ militant rate. But as I read it that's hamas only - so overall the majority would be militants" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1752110924628893917) 2024-01-29T23:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Public8713 @SarahKa85026145 I have none of that experience either aware of it only through the fiction I read. Even from such a tenuous basis it seems obvious enough. I'm ashamed of those on the left who are too blind to get even the hint of a glimpse at this" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1752146272121975253) 2024-01-30T01:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@nanomedia1 @BLheureux @NickKnudsenUS You don't really think the white house actually shared ronny's stash with congress do you" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1753250290273497183) 2024-02-02T02:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@MonicaLogallmon @ACLieberman Of course there's another reason - seeking a judge proven to be biased for the accused. Not even in the court district in which the docs were held which might have had some arguable validity. (I believe cannon's district fielded the GJ but that's just another layer.)" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1753293563402801525) 2024-02-02T05:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Ty___Webb Meanwhile with [--] seditious governors and none of the instigators of the insurrection being charged the country laughingly known as the "united" states looks on the verge of either collapse or civil war. Arent verges fun You can be almost anywhere and still be on a "verge"" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1753570704711455017) 2024-02-03T00:06Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Hoomanbod @morepuzzled Would that be the war fought by Arabs invading the Jewish half of British Mandate Palestine after they were given the eastern half They were the invaders multiple Arab countries invading Israel the day it was created. And they lost that war like all the others they started" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1753600412547268791) 2024-02-03T02:04Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@3asef710 @MirabelleW18 And you think being indigenous determines the result of wars That's what this was based on with Britain defeating the Ottoman Turks. That gave them the opportunity just as Arabs lost multiple opportunities in the multiple wars they lost against Israel" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1753692962549387421) 2024-02-03T08:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Meerkatwonder @Ty___Webb @winnygirl03 Picture Australia's Great Northern Rd [----] km walking along the edge the verge. I rather doubt many of us will live to see anything but that "verge"" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1753937767833493590) 2024-02-04T00:25Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@OfficialT_P_V @KerenZelwer That's not an honest question. hamas are the govt in Gaza conducting govt terrorism against Israel. The contrast you seek to draw is completely dishonest because there is no meaningful similarity. OF COURSE a govt will respond differently in an area they control vs hostile" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1753980439730253950) 2024-02-04T03:14Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@truebluedoo @OfficialT_P_V @aricfedida @KerenZelwer A reasonable explanation of a couple of the incredible differences that make the two situations world's apart. There are far more differences than the two similarities of hamas + hostages" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1753980964555161765) 2024-02-04T03:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Jennyil @OfficialT_P_V @KerenZelwer And that military response was deliberately sought for the purpose of undermining public support. Since it was so very deliberate - the entirety of the blame goes to those who sought it hamas. Not Israel for responding largely exactly as hamas desired. The West is being played" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1753984234371547142) 2024-02-04T03:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@FaerieWhings @KerenZelwer @OfficialT_P_V Last I heard nearly [-----] in total - according to hamas. More than half of which are apparently being buried by hamas as if they're members. ie militants not "civilians". Even if there were a useful distinction between "civilians" and "terrorists"" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1753986409835426156) 2024-02-04T03:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@DianeBernaerts @svdate @AntiToxicPeople Come on Diane please be serious - he knows his cult (and their elected representatives) have no consistency convictions or principles. They're flipping their lies about the trump impeachments to support their lies to excuse the baseless impeachment of Mayorkas. No consistency" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1755152507964457208) 2024-02-07T08:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@MaryMieze @TomJChicago Actually it's necessary the special counsel challenge appeal dispute and use every procedural or legal resource possible to avoid exactly that. Maybe a CISA court can review it and overrule her or something (I know probably not). Because that might be the only proof" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1756362752246116834) 2024-02-10T17:01Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Andreas43937443 @CalynaHaunt Sadly I think Biden's too weak and in this regard too similar to garland to respond in that way. He seems too scared of criticism for doing the right thing" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1756403739857182770) 2024-02-10T19:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@JBellSATX @hugolowell @guardian As I understand it this is only the info about the threats that are already being made to a witness that maga world has already identified - ie limited danger in sharing what isn't secret anyway especially for a witness who should be in protection" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1757063906521178376) 2024-02-12T15:27Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@FillmoreWhite @Ty22Best @mmpadellan @SenateDems @SenSchumer I can't get on board with this - either it's a valid (unjustified) impeachment in which case it needs to be dismissed at the first opportunity. Or it's NOT and need never be accepted sufficiently to dismiss. Taking this middle ground to push for legislation is unbalanced" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1758159125492686888) 2024-02-15T15:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@JoJoFromJerz It's those without a single firing synapse who still support all the above that terrify me" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1758159938982150278) 2024-02-15T16:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@IsolepKcuf @JonCThought @JoJoFromJerz Calling for peace and disbursement Wtf are you on and where can I get some" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1758162510010835071) 2024-02-15T16:13Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@beach_hermit Which time I mean I could probably look up the figures and tie it to a specific incident but only the figures might narrow that down. Otherwise it describes every mass shooting america has almost every damn day. Civilised countries solve the problem. america never does" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1758245192191320221) 2024-02-15T21:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@beach_hermit Australia decided after Port Arthur 26+ years ago that we didn't like mass shootings and a conservative PM pushed through major gun reforms. We've had one mass shooting since. A long list of other countries have done the same with similar effect" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1758245936181182596) 2024-02-15T21:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@scotbutl @moronsdog @DJHuntPCG @PrezLives2022 That was my understanding but apparently the appeals court in his civil fraud case ruled otherwise which I never understood. As both an ongoing crime and a civil matter - I thought the SoL was irrelevant" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1759101206021161324) 2024-02-18T06:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@dont_atmebro @churchlady320 @ReallyAmerican1 @mmpadellan Not relevant. He claimed in another case to have $400 million in liquid assets and if he has to sell off assets at a loss to cover the ruling too bad. If he can't sell those assets at a loss fast enough to hit the appeal deadline too bad" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1760870302324871317) 2024-02-23T03:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@DeePleurable @UrwaRajpoot2 @ReallyAmerican1 You have no idea what fraud is. And the banks were defrauded if you look at some reporting about the ruling you'll see a figure in the penalty for interest that was evaded by the fraud you pretend didn't exist. Its a [--] figure amount which the banks lost" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1760874265732407338) 2024-02-23T03:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@DianaCialino @ConLaw60654 @JenKonitzer @ReallyAmerican1 Is Deutsche Bank chartered in NY Even if they are I'm sure there are money laundering outlets in Cyprus or the UK that would be happy to funnel money from DB with Sberbank again acting as guarantor to DB" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1760875390619570657) 2024-02-23T03:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@CannaKingCA20 @MaryandWinnie @KatiePhang Because they're in a relationship EXPLICITLY permitted under GA law/regulations You don't even identify what assumptions you're making which drastically multiplies the lack of credibility" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1761265495456788966) 2024-02-24T05:43Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@rf_in_the_bush @ampalsson @wewatchu2 @superduker1301 We know a certain pacific power bought out the Solomon Islands despite our decades of support for them and trump would probably be cheaper than the SI PM. A few more trademarks for ivanka and he'd probably gift wrap us for them" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1761604324264952157) 2024-02-25T04:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@CycleGearGuy @Ty___Webb @Michell33650674 Sorry but the Divided States of Anarchy are not a civilised country if they qualify as any kind of real country at all. Daily mass shootings on average when genuinely civilised countries step in to prevent them after the FIRST major incident Sorry not even close to pretend" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1761609272566378773) 2024-02-25T04:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@ryanstruyk Such countries allow their parliament PM president or governor general (as appropriate) to call the election. Not a traitor seeking to overthrow the duly elected govt AGAIN" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1761616927133515935) 2024-02-25T04:59Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@nfstxm24hz @AuGeekom The same company offers multiple AMD systems also" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1761619400183222696) 2024-02-25T05:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@ResearchFacts1 @rawpuck @TrumpIsTheEnemy @meiselasb @drfarmertx Admitting to perjury would make for an interesting start to bankruptcy proceedings. But Barbara Jones is not running anything merely monitoring for the court" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1761625697540612166) 2024-02-25T05:34Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@dovgvlad @lupinski @JoJoFromJerz But being in a country edging up towards [--] 1/2 mass shootings per day IS something to be proud of Your "pride" seems horrifically tied to mass murder" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1762283288159560121) 2024-02-27T01:07Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@paulhericsson @MAC_Arms @JoJoFromJerz There's a difference of scale but "gun deaths" include accidents and suicides and they're all made worse by guns" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1762285939345563916) 2024-02-27T01:18Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@RGuy999 @JoJoFromJerz Gun control doesn't need to "reduce crime" to be valuable - it can save lives even if crime WENT UP. Civilised countries value human life the Divided States of Anarchy aren't civilised" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1762286614099984395) 2024-02-27T01:20Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@Palau_Tam @har26606511 @maddssnapper @KatiePhang Georgia rules explicitly allow personal relationships. I can't speak to any requirement to disclose it but since they're on the same side it looks like a total beat-up" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1762289286135890207) 2024-02-27T01:31Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@frankdpi @TheOnion Imagine if that was satire instead of an accurate reflection of the services he provides. Of course the alleged discount is sarcasm.but the rest is accurate" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1762303906884014172) 2024-02-27T02:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Fixitguy8 @Snarky_gnome @TonyBHMS @aesagt @sentdefender You're presenting the claim you refute it if you can think straight" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1762304151088963994) 2024-02-27T02:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@_youre_annoying @CandyWagner @KatiePhang Largely because NOTHING you claim has been established not even to a civil probability level. Onky IF your claims are upheld by the court is there anything to excuse. But this is all an unethical attack on the prosecutors with no semblance of justice" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1762304858017919065) 2024-02-27T02:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@RGuy999 @JoJoFromJerz Crime and gun deaths are different concepts. Even if there were more crime saving lives is worthwhile. Really not that hard unless you have no value for human life or dishonestly equate "crime" with "gun deaths". Which would be a very revealing lie in any case" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1762305610685825346) 2024-02-27T02:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@dovgvlad @lupinski @JoJoFromJerz Why bother when so many like you support them" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1762305881071669724) 2024-02-27T02:37Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@truebloodnet @AZCorgiMom @lawofruby Yes and that there is the point - they are twisting things out of shape not taking a rough path to do the right thing" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1762306240661844078) 2024-02-27T02:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Peter_Speeder1 @JLaneMcMahon @aruby4u @RepRiggleman They could challenge the subpoena and apparently they do so routinely. I doubt they'd face any problems unless they ignored a court order backing up the subpoena. As for Wade (and Willis) being notified - that being required doesn't mean it happened" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1762306975055110168) 2024-02-27T02:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@thegregoryyoung @EdKrassen @Mari2025z I don't recall seeing the model mentioned are you sure it was a MacBook and new enough to have such protection UEFI and the secure boot process are far from universal in the general PC (rather than Mac) space and I've no idea when that level of security was introduced" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764215100138041400) 2024-03-03T09:03Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@blitziod @micktbarnard @Mari2025z @EdKrassen You come close to making a good point. That's confirmation that they've had access to his data - but doesn't confirm where it came from (laptop or hack) nor how much is unchanged. So it wasn't fabricated from scratch - but has definitely been at least somewhat altered. Useless" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764216015477747836) 2024-03-03T09:07Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@blitziod @micktbarnard @Mari2025z @EdKrassen Except they AREN'T exposing anything real. You're describing what they should be doing but their fishing expeditions have no sound basis and aren't finding anything real. They can't even clearly identify the basis for impeachment and fail to confirm any allegations" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764216632338214999) 2024-03-03T09:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Tasreme @har26606511 @Mari2025z @EdKrassen The blind repairman confirmed its been altered since he took an image of it and that drive image is what has been shared - and could have been modified at every change of hands. That the FBI reviewed a possibly intact version.proves nothing about any other copy" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764218326992248895) 2024-03-03T09:16Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Tasreme @har26606511 @Mari2025z @EdKrassen I've seen only indirect and often vague references to the FBI looking into this - did they examine the physical laptop/drive or an image of it Quite different analyses of each situation.a drive image doesn't have a serial number per se although it could have markers" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764219035737280867) 2024-03-03T09:19Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@tim76469823 @Mari2025z @EdKrassen Very true. The extent of the unaltered data and the altered or completely fabricated data is the uncertainty. As is the original source - could have been a hacked iCloud account stolen/copied backup etc. But we do know that what's presented as being on it cannot be trusted" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764220529492570618) 2024-03-03T09:25Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Julie2323293244 @DarrenStephano1 @Mari2025z @EdKrassen Which tells you nothing except that someone got access to his data" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764220785957486819) 2024-03-03T09:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@DarrenStephano1 @Julie2323293244 @Mari2025z @EdKrassen A certified Mac repair guy said that MacBook hard drives are soldered to the laptop board so it's all or nothing. But I've seen no confirmed reports about the physical drive or laptop only references to the image of the drive taken by the blind repair guy and disseminated" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764221386367869370) 2024-03-03T09:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@orin_jacobs @Mari2025z @EdKrassen And did they also track the serial number or verify what WASN'T on the laptop/iCloud Because alterations made to a drive image after that lack any of the confirmation you refer to.and may have been all based on hacking that iCloud account. Many limits to this verification" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764222213946028469) 2024-03-03T09:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@MikeZatkovic @Mari2025z @EdKrassen Yes it really doesn't hard" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764222465243582589) 2024-03-03T09:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@DeanJFletcher @scottkanerva @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat The physical item cannot be copied and altered as easily as a digital image. It could also be tracked to a purchase by the serial number. I've seen unconfirmed comments that the FBI collected the laptop in [----] and confirmed it's contents against Hunter's iCloud - which could" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764223299335356854) 2024-03-03T09:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@DeanJFletcher @scottkanerva @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat mean nothing more than someone hacked his iCloud and copied it to a laptop he'd never seen or touched much less owned. Im dubious about the claim - but the laptop itself still proves nothing about the altered contents of the drive images that have been shared widely" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764223837422620722) 2024-03-03T09:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@normbnyc @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat Makes sense but I'm seeing a lot of contradictions about what the FBI checked and confirmed. Almost seems like there should be clear reporting of whatever statement or report the FBI issued. But no-one's linking any" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764224309931966649) 2024-03-03T09:40Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Snodevil1 @har26606511 @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat While this may be true mobile "keyboards" make mistakes easier and less obvious than typos on a real keyboard. I spent many many years auto-correcting typos in chat to the extent of not even seeing them but what had been intended because the typos were so consistent. No more" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764225501147942970) 2024-03-03T09:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Deke3516 @CeliaLauer @thetroybarnes1 @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat No there were docs (a conversation of some sort) on the laptop that were faked. An interaction that never occurred not merely a claim made up but fabricated evidence of something that never happened. Subtle but significant difference - if I understand Hunter correctly" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764226889995165995) 2024-03-03T09:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Jesse76330534 @Carrie10231215 @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat Specifics are too easily debunked - but accusations that are too vague to be confirmed OR debunked are obvious lies. Unless they're in clear reference to specifics like a court case" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764227491810697571) 2024-03-03T09:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@al_nahmias @grcflwlkr2 @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat I've seen this said several times do you have links to any reporting on it" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764228047887298808) 2024-03-03T09:55Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Arcijay00 @doodaaman @MRS_MRS4 @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat That's interesting but far from convincing. It's political reporting on vague and qualified deductions by someone who should not have been answering questions based on being "fairly certain" who was in a position to know things rather than actual knowledge. Too much is hesrsay" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764230349138362431) 2024-03-03T10:04Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@GUSTAVO09184349 @907Bex @EdKrassen You're conflating too many different concepts here. Having abandoned the device he can't blame the shop for deleting the contents. Possession or even ownership of the hardware doesn't grant ANY rights to the contents only to using the storage media for their own purposes" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764242356956799092) 2024-03-03T10:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@trevorspoke @tribelaw @XenaWarrior2022 To clarify it absolutely does exist and it absolutely does apply in the terms tribe misused ie "bringing" or commencing the prosecution. Not to the trial dates chosen by the judge which is beyond doj control. So many vague and blatantly obvious inaccuracies" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764258138184982974) 2024-03-03T11:54Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Check_ur_source @trevorspoke @tribelaw @XenaWarrior2022 Making tribe's misrepresentation even more egregious. As a supposedly respected lawyer he could reasonably be expected to be aware of this and to have noticed the testimony confirming the existence of the policy he claims doesn't exist - and in fact has that exact meaning" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764261131634507881) 2024-03-03T12:06Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@KatiePhang So much clearer and more accurate than Lawrence Tribe claiming the opposite. I'm utterly disgusted by the supposedly respected lawyer" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764261554999177558) 2024-03-03T12:08Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@KatiePhang Tribe claims the policy doesn't exist while rephrasing JB's statement to match exactly what the policy DOES say. They can't "bring" a prosecution within [--] days which has nothing to do with the eventual trial dates. Jay Bratt Chief of Counterintelligence at DOJs National Security Division told the court that DOJ has no regulations saying it must refrain from bringing criminal cases against defendants within [--] days of an election. Nor would any such policy be justifiable. Jay Bratt Chief of Counterintelligence at DOJs National Security Division told the court that DOJ has no" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764262317469127032) 2024-03-03T12:11Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@kylegriffin1 No-one on scotus believes states are PERMITTED to obey the constitution. Let that sink in. Not a single one of them believes states are allowed to comply with the constitution even if they try. I wonder if any of them have the guts to say "we're following the 14th anyway"" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764745123341148160) 2024-03-04T20:09Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@palazzo214 @kylegriffin1 I'm not sure it matters - [--] justices believe states are forbidden to comply with the constitution but it's only the constitution that gives scotus any authority. And they've unanimously tossed it in the bin. The USA is dead. Long live the Divided States of Anarchy" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764745673365500242) 2024-03-04T20:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@AvivaKlompas @lauferlaw Not the WHOLE world - only the witless wonders blindly accepting terrorist propaganda. I've got things to blame Israel for - ask me after the war after hamas is defeated and the rockets stop. Only then will it be relevant. Until then this is what hamas SOUGHT" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764768040074576221) 2024-03-04T21:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@BradMossEsq Scotus just ordered states NOT to comply with the constitution so I don't see why the [--] or any other amendment or section would be relevant. In particular scotus just destroyed their own authority to tell anyone what to do" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764769941012853134) 2024-03-04T21:48Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@AJDelgado13 The Divided States of Anarchy are falling apart already - a partisan majority ruling would have been no surprise but unanimous There's no more constitution no more scotus - just momentum and chaos" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764770348510462301) 2024-03-04T21:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@syxtoezz @BlackKnight10k I think the text means - this amendment does nothing until congress chooses to implement it and just ignore what we said about a 2/3 majority. Obviously I'm referring to the updated amendment scotus released today - the original says the exact opposite. It takes effect UNLESS" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764770940876177661) 2024-03-04T21:52Z [---] followers, [---] engagements "@groeblbubble @BlackKnight10k Violating the constitution scotus just tore up doesn't help restore it. .but with it torn up and having just failed spectacularly I'm not sure if it can be restored. Plus there's [--] justices who unanimously tossed the constitution out the window" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764771410080338303) 2024-03-04T21:54Z [---] followers, [----] engagements "@nobodycrowley @MerrittKelly1 @kylegriffin1 Absolutely - but sect [--] of the 14th explicitly grants congress the authority to enforce it which I interpret as writing those rules. But they haven't. So there AREN'T any such rules leaving it to each state to apply - or scotus to order all states to apply" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764772186496356662) 2024-03-04T21:57Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@ReekOShame @beach_hermit Yeah I'm still processing scotus ordering states to ignore the constitution. It was your point about the swing states that really threw me I've seen too many articles about repubs who won't vote for the traitor to realise things were that dire. Combined with scotus - S#*T" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764772755130794072) 2024-03-04T21:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@dsrose @hamburg_steven @harrylitman All it requires is integrity. Congress can enforce the 14th but hasn't passed any such law. In the absence of that authorised law - states should be bound to carry out the requirements of sect [--] as best they can or as ordered by scotus (or congress). Ad hoc by state nothing" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764789640530366886) 2024-03-04T23:06Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@brownsfan1414 @EeDiva_ @ElieNYC That's a really pathetic argument. They could only legitimately do that if they could demonstrate he engaged in insurrection - applying it exactly as written doesn't make it universal" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764790663131131968) 2024-03-04T23:10Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@jackfro69234272 @harrylitman .according to whom Scotus Who just ordered states to ignore the constitution I'm not sure they have that authority now they've decided it doesn't apply. The only basis for their authority was the document they dismiss" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764793926622580747) 2024-03-04T23:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@brownsfan1414 @EeDiva_ @ElieNYC You sound just like an insurrectionist yourself. Scotus job is NOT to he political. They're supposed to uphold the laws and constitution - not rewrite them for political expediency. This ruling may very well cause far worse chaos because it overturns the constitution" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764794609971216446) 2024-03-04T23:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@beach_hermit Neither does the doj nor scotus. Does america have any accountability for rich or political criminals Apart from their own party convincing them to resign if they're Democrats. That really doesn't count even if it's better than nothing" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764796580123771087) 2024-03-04T23:34Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Thom_Hartmann Congress has to pass a law with simple majorities before the constitution that empowers them to make laws takes effect - and then allows them to change that with a super majority. Or they can just repudiate the constitution like scotus" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764797010778157271) 2024-03-04T23:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@Trump202469420 @idummkopp @Thom_Hartmann So you didn't read it or didn't understand Sect explicitly requires a super majority for an exception (otherwise insurrectionists are D/Q). Scotus declared the opposite that the amendment does nothing unless congress decides to. The exception can only fit with self-executing" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764799039319765016) 2024-03-04T23:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@PatrickLovell1 @Thom_Hartmann That's why the repudiation of the constitution is so significant. It was a foundation that scotus has just cut away. Very blatantly declaring the opposite of what it says. Not "only DQ if." but "DQ unless a super majority." There's no ambiguity there unless it's added" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764800360978546721) 2024-03-04T23:49Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TCantler @VictoryCroi @EricShapiro3 @ElieNYC Exactly why I said a few posts up the chain that the ship had sailed. [--] extra perfectly fit the circuit count and was objectively and clearly justified. It also fit the political aim - but that isn't sufficient. Now [--] extra justices wouldn't restore scotus" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764803005243916556) 2024-03-04T23:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@dsrose @hamburg_steven @harrylitman Sure that would work if congress works. But it isn't necessary. Scotus' argument that the amendment doesn't take effect without action by congress allows the disqualification to be be bypassed by inaction - despite the explicit need for a super majority to re-qualify" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764833566137930116) 2024-03-05T02:01Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell And which level administers elections is it state or federal Thank you for playing. Candidates aren't federal officials while running for office" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764851855803502729) 2024-03-05T03:14Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell The thing is that federal law supercedes state - not that states can't make any laws. In the absence of a relevant federal law state laws apply. Congress rules on disqualification would obviously take precedence - if there were any. But there aren't" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764852766055485527) 2024-03-05T03:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell You do realise we're talking about a constitutional amendment don't you It's not states imposing anything on a higher level of govt - it's states implementing (in the absence of legislation) a rule imposed on the country by the constitution" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764853229891031471) 2024-03-05T03:19Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell Even though the exemption in sect [--] is irrelevant since congress hasn't established any disqualification - making that interpretation inconsistent The higher bar for granting an exemption both shows its self-executing and how hard it is to restore eligibility. Already removed" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764853893484495203) 2024-03-05T03:22Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell by the constitution - not by any state even if a state complies with the constitution in carrying it out. Consistency matters" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764854233973534931) 2024-03-05T03:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell Then why do you misrepresent the disqualification imposed on states and fed as being applied by a state on a federal position Elections are after all a state responsibility - even if congress has some authority over them they still aren't run by the federal govt" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764855041553555750) 2024-03-05T03:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell This comment shows a clear political bias which you interjected even though term limits have no relevance to the discussion. The disqualification is ALREADY in the constitution. But you don't believe in the constitution" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764855862886371369) 2024-03-05T03:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell I doubt we will ever agree completely but this is close enough. I can't agree that only a federal court can tell a state how to run their elections but I would accept that they could override a state court which is close enough. And the total nonsense definitely" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764856787902353424) 2024-03-05T03:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@LSDSHARP Really gotta wonder what kind of "country" forbids it's states to comply with the constitution. Obeying federal rules is obvious if they exist. But forbidding states from complying as best they can in the absence of such rules.really just repudiates the constitution" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764858011150135597) 2024-03-05T03:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@AshaRangappa_ Apparently since congress hasn't passed legislation to disqualify anyone the constitution is irrelevant - which logically means congress overrides the constitution since they decide whether it gets implemented or just ignore it. But scotus just rewrites it anyway" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764859095994220925) 2024-03-05T03:42Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@harrylitman That's a political judgement - that congress can fix if they wish. But the amendment clearly doesn't require congress to implement it even though they can fill in the gaps. But even then they can only tell the states how to implement it since states run the elections" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764859655254327755) 2024-03-05T03:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@justsayit1000 I doubt he ever was - but I'm sure he's still crossing i's and dotting t's. Yes exactly. The wrong way around. If he were trying to get it right he would have by now" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764860208185295204) 2024-03-05T03:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@kylegriffin1 But they did say that states were forbidden to comply with the constitution" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764860352704253988) 2024-03-05T03:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@7Veritas4 He has a dementia ring which prevents a decoder ring from working" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764860989311529167) 2024-03-05T03:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell We're responding out of order - I wrote this before I saw or replied to several other tweets which read very differently" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764861483677356258) 2024-03-05T03:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell Look at this message in the context of the ones preceding it in the chain instead of rage tweeting as you accuse me of. The gratuitous reference to a dem winning [--] terms prompted those comments - very diff't to what you said elsewhere and v diff't to how I responded to that" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764862539551367378) 2024-03-05T03:56Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@BradMossEsq Aren't "natural born citizens" in sect [--] of the 14th Or did that just alter it partially I've been brushing past it repeatedly for sects [--] & 5" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764863489678754142) 2024-03-05T04:00Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@kylegriffin1 Only that states are forbidden to comply with the constitution in the elections they administer. .unless congress decides to implement the suggestion from the constitution. Is that how it works Sorry I guess it doesn't work at all" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764864061173637195) 2024-03-05T04:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@ChuckHeywood1 @EPICGOPFAIL Or maybe June" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764864684933664768) 2024-03-05T04:05Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@glennkirschner2 It's only the constitution - more what you'd call guidelines than actual rules as Barbossa would put it" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764865586037924164) 2024-03-05T04:08Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@DianeBernaerts Because america is a house of cards and previous govts/presidents chose to support it. But it depended on that choice and has proven to be too weak and malformed to withstand the opposite" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764866139593884063) 2024-03-05T04:10Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@BarbaraVal30691 @DianeBernaerts @USSupremeCourt Or rewrite the constitution and forbid states to comply with it" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764866377385664612) 2024-03-05T04:11Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@EricaOfNafo @backroadsrule @emptywheel Possibly or maybe even edited against their will. Invalidating a constitutional amendment they swore to uphold really doesn't leave them any credibility much less enough to challenge the majority that just walked all over them. (Although I did read it as [--] dissents.)" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764867908969419106) 2024-03-05T04:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@PenMandoGorgu @emptywheel @MuellerSheWrote And basic reading comprehension. If people knew what the words meant it could be a little harder to convince them they really mean the exact opposite. Like scotus claiming the 14th does nothing without congress when it only allows them to grant an exception" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764868675159605592) 2024-03-05T04:20Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@topherjk @emptywheel @MuellerSheWrote Scotus is a supreme power now not subject to anything not even bound by the constitution they just rewrote. Why would he fold He knows he's untouchable" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764869323318075501) 2024-03-05T04:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@repairrestores1 @emptywheel Sorry but no-one does unless their state grants it. I wish more americans realised the constitution grants that right to states not citizens" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764869643276304445) 2024-03-05T04:24Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@tokenvoter420 @LGrosgebauer @emptywheel @DittiePE That phrasing is clarifying - states obviously can't force anyone else to comply.but scotus ordered states to ignore the constitution. States HAVE to implement the disqualification they run the elections. "enforce" is being seriously abused today" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764870342676562133) 2024-03-05T04:27Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@el71254 @emptywheel @clalter59 .but there were two separate conclusions with two separate votes. Only one was unanimous - that states cannot comply with the constitution. Seems a little odd though" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764870830607966699) 2024-03-05T04:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@PenMandoGorgu @tommyrulznyc @emptywheel Actually if you read past the waffling about rescheduling etc - the article confirms a deadlock leaves the lower court decision intact" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764871579123826765) 2024-03-05T04:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@rgoodlaw @NevadaAG @AaronDFordNV So what Repeat perjury is only [--] months these days especially when your lawyer refuses to answer the judge's question about the plea negotiation" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764872280986067263) 2024-03-05T04:35Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@PortSuccs @rgoodlaw @NevadaAG @AaronDFordNV Timing matters as smirnov might agree" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764872804007346234) 2024-03-05T04:37Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@PatriciaShea53 @BruceDuck2 @SusanDu05610431 @rgoodlaw @NevadaAG @AaronDFordNV And once again it's all about the details" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764873179791790173) 2024-03-05T04:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@shellyhughes01 @BruceDuck2 @SusanDu05610431 @rgoodlaw @NevadaAG @AaronDFordNV Flesh pots is that what this Freudian slip was about Perhaps you should flush that dirty mind and get a new one" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764873436219019420) 2024-03-05T04:39Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@cabbageridge @rgoodlaw @rhonda_harbison @NevadaAG @AaronDFordNV That's not their job that's why the doj should have handled it. But just as in the disqualification issue in the absence of federal conscientiousness it falls down on the states to carry the load on an ad hoc basis. Unless scotus forbids that" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764875154684022982) 2024-03-05T04:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@WordWanderer @yepsuzn @MartinJmcmah @judgeluttig I believe the person you're replying to is only interested in undue process that provides the results they like. Of course the absence of any rules from congress logically leaves states to comply as best they can. Or did until scotus ordered them to violate the constitution" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764876794501751262) 2024-03-05T04:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@KatherineWare1 @pnwaf1212 @lilyvnshtp @judgeluttig They're just like scotus rewriting the constitution to say what they mean because they know it doesn't mean what they say" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764878677966471399) 2024-03-05T05:00Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@ScottieP317 @lilyvnshtp @judgeluttig Blame scotus for rewriting the amendment ignoring a requirement that clearly shows it is self-executing and creating one that doesn't exist - while demoting the constitution below the level of legislation" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764881067172106322) 2024-03-05T05:10Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@MRpetwir @bsunderlinmsp @TreesB59ABV @judgeluttig I would suggest to you that if they placed any value on consistency they would not have declared an amendment inoperative unless congress allows it - when the amendment explicitly requires a super majority to grant an exception - not inaction" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764886229911568563) 2024-03-05T05:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@MRpetwir @bsunderlinmsp @TreesB59ABV @judgeluttig The saddest part here is the suggestion that congress proposing to grant trump an exception could in failing the 2/3 majority disqualify him from running. Even scotus would struggle to dismiss the failure of the exception" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764886913713111403) 2024-03-05T05:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@SkolasJohn @TreesB59ABV @judgeluttig That lack of uniformity is the obvious necessary consequence of not having federal rules applying universally. Unless told otherwise - they have to work it out as best they can. Exactly as w/ the 14th until scotus decapitated it" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764887486634008846) 2024-03-05T05:35Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@dieselnyc1 @TreesB59ABV @judgeluttig But NOT disqualifying someone requires a 2/3 majority of both chambers of congress. An inconvenient detail scotus seems to have ignored in ruling that the amendment doesn't mean what it says it means" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764887989459849698) 2024-03-05T05:37Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@MarkWil75164706 @TreesB59ABV @judgeluttig You haven't actually read it have you It grants authority - not responsibility to do so before the amendment takes effect. Congress is allowed to enforce the rule - but they haven't which doesn't remove the rule - it just leaves states to work out how to comply" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764889179631358150) 2024-03-05T05:42Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@bfry1981 @judgeluttig This almost sounds like something the CO supreme court should have considered Oh wait they did. Despite cultists pretending there was no due process" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764890255969395117) 2024-03-05T05:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@ObFinancial @SporkboyProton @judgeluttig Well scotus basically ruled the amendment to be meaningless without legislation by congress which would supplant the amendment anyway. So it really doesn't apply to anyone even if later legislation might" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764892435199733951) 2024-03-05T05:55Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@a1magfly @politicalblond @judgeluttig @MuellerSheWrote @POTUS Congress actually writes the laws more than obey them (as an institution). It's scotus that needs to obey the law and the constitution instead of rewriting them to achieve political goals without sound legal reasoning" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764894182894866501) 2024-03-05T06:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@checkmate95991 @judgeluttig That's backwards. The ruling doesn't grant federal oversight sect [--] already explicitly granted that authority to congress. Scotus has merely forbidden states from complying unless and until a dysfunctional congress can pass a law that scotus could throw out. Again. Again" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764899159893823849) 2024-03-05T06:22Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@donnastowe1 @judgeluttig @MuellerSheWrote @tribelaw That's upside down - the amendment doesn't require ANY action to implement it - it actually requires the super majority to grant an exception to the disqualification. Scotus inverted that by declaring the amendment invalid unless congress implements it so no-one is DQ'd" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764901520817131996) 2024-03-05T06:31Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@tokenvoter420 @LGrosgebauer @emptywheel @DittiePE Or that the amendment is irrelevant and meaningless and only legislation inspired by it could have any validity. After they apparently tossed a law doing exactly that suggesting that its scotus not the constitution that's invalid" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764903543415480654) 2024-03-05T06:39Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@SamiaAliSalama8 @neal_katyal To be fair states can't have the right to ban people from an election - but they must be permitted to remove those constitutionally disqualified. Instead scotus forbids them from doing so and overrides the 14th - inverting the sense of it "DQ unless super majority."" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764904721062699432) 2024-03-05T06:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@SnarkyLibruhl @ajg6882 @neal_katyal It just boils down to: is the constitution real or merely a set of guidelines We all know he's DQ'd under sect [--] - and scotus has declared congress the deciders of whether that has meaning. They wouldn't be creating a rule merely implementing one long established" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764905773740761547) 2024-03-05T06:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@kylelaine58 @SnarkyLibruhl @kabulykos @neal_katyal So you're saying the CO supreme court didn't reach that conclusion or that you weren't aware of it Because "he wasn't" really won't convince anyone it was inaccurate" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764906783989227970) 2024-03-05T06:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@jeannie1003 @NotFunnyAtAll16 @SnarkyLibruhl @neal_katyal Hypothetically that sounds like it fits together. Except scotus has already unilaterally rewritten a constitutional amendment why do you think they'd allow it to be implemented by congress after they sold out and betrayed the constitution" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764908925928042700) 2024-03-05T07:00Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@donnastowe1 @judgeluttig @MuellerSheWrote @tribelaw If everyone accepts the obviously invalid ruling. But scotus only has authority because of the constitution they've just repudiated. #DeepTrouble indeed" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764911956899823665) 2024-03-05T07:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell That essentially refers to the process though - if it's law that has to comply with the constitution it's superior in some way. But from what you say I guess a lot less than I thought.really seems like an unnecessary chicken and egg since laws rely on the C'n for validity" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764912866581451150) 2024-03-05T07:16Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@zimmy1998 @BradMossEsq Of course that would immediately be challenged and appealed up to scotus who would just move the goalposts again" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764921455970750738) 2024-03-05T07:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@vector1928 @BradMossEsq I've been told only 2-3 were charged and the only one convicted was pardoned. (Or very similar to that) It worked because they wanted it to work the exact inverse of now. It would work if scotus allowed it to instead of rewriting it" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764924834352693699) 2024-03-05T08:04Z [---] followers, [--] engagements "@TMarckesano @BradMossEsq Well states are forbidden from doing so according to scotus" [X Link](https://x.com/GrayElf_/status/1764925261319901273) 2024-03-05T08:05Z [---] followers, [--] engagements Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing
@GrayElf_ Paul WilliamsPaul Williams posts on X about israel, murder, hamas, russia the most. They currently have [-------] followers and [----] posts still getting attention that total [-------] engagements in the last [--] hours.
Social category influence countries finance celebrities us election technology brands travel destinations stocks social networks automotive brands musicians
Social topic influence israel, murder, hamas, russia, ukraine, countries, in the, australia, palestine, epstein files
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @sentdefender @edkrassen @osint613 @allenanalysis @lawofruby @judgeluttig @patriottakes @tristansnell @thejackhopkins @kepi1107 @kylegriffin1 @jojofromjerz @beachhermit @tolddude @anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @calltoactivism @agentself99b @mari2025z @grok
Top assets mentioned Validity (VAL) Shrapnel (SHRAP) Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)
Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours
"@BaddCompani Still zero criminal charges (except the historic fraud in NY) so nothing's sealed. We know he'd be convicted if he was ever charged but with garland's obstruction there's no reason to believe that will ever happen"
X Link 2023-05-21T01:40Z [---] followers, [----] engagements
"@BirgitC @ParkMargot61 @vcocozza76 @jamie_lashmar @PA How exactly does confetti disrupt the wedding I admit the technique was less than stellar but still just like you'd expect at a wedding - except most weddings actually have multiple guests"
X Link 2023-07-10T16:39Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@tdwbi95 @charlesjblack @jamie_lashmar @PA So you actually know them There's so much total BS around this almost entirely manufactured outrage.including claims it was a JSO op when it all seems to be about her assumed mindset and motivation. Absolutely nothing there worthy of note other than the principals"
X Link 2023-07-10T17:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@NWO_Covid_WW3 @Montecit0Pearl @jamie_lashmar @PA @RubyRedhead4 Thank you that's the ONLY hint of potential meaning I've run across. Now.was there any alleged meaning behind the orange confetti at Wimbledon"
X Link 2023-07-10T17:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@JjinUk64 @JustStop_Oil A common wedding tradition - that you failed to challenge on any objective basis. The alleged beliefs of the guest in question do not change the fact that throwing confetti is both innocuous and expected at weddings"
X Link 2023-07-10T17:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@LouiseMensch @randymot4 @GOP @TheDemocrats I'm not because only one of the two would actually have that intention regardless of any efforts to argue for more. The actual goal would be obstruction and & Dems cooperating to "fight" over a non-issue would fail to make real progress. Ukraine would lose that fight"
X Link 2023-07-12T04:38Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@Olusola2762 @DavidSoulsby11 @btaychert @IAPonomarenko @NATO @POTUS @jensstoltenberg Is that why both Sweden and Finland were approved immediately because everyone rubber-stamped whatever the us said Except hungary took a lot of convincing and turkey probably needed to be "read the riot act" and threatened before they allowed Sweden in"
X Link 2023-07-12T09:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Patriot_Lioness @OccupyDemocrats Your own comment makes clear that access granted by the state would NOT be a valid target for criminal investigation. Any objective view would be Thst Willis is looking at something very different and very illegal without any legitimacy"
X Link 2023-08-14T05:08Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@CalynaHaunt So many "worst ever"s at the same time with Biden achieving some great things - but earning a place almost as bad for overseeing such a travesty. He's just too weak and mired in the past when "republicans" possessed some scintilla of good faith"
X Link 2023-08-25T07:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@LooneeLuna @JasonOverstreet @johncusack And he's KEPT doing it because he wasn't indicted for so long. He KEEPS intimidating witnesses because he's never held accountable for it. And so on over and over and over"
X Link 2023-08-26T12:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@RpsAgainstTrump Confirms the guilt of traitor trump but excuses nothing the false electors did. There is no conceivable excuse for lying and saying they were "duly elected" when they knew they weren't. (One state altered the template giving them a possible excuse.maybe.)"
X Link 2023-08-26T12:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@tom_nevin @JoyceWhiteVance I expect it's (also) far more complex than that but at the most superficial level: increase valuations to get lower interest rates on loans; reduce valuations to pay less tax. Of course his valuatuons shouldn't be decisive but I did say more complex than that"
X Link 2023-08-31T11:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@tomcblanton @JoyceWhiteVance Is that an honest question Seems unlikely but I'll bite. The banks could have lost money by offering lower interest rates than were justified just as the state might have lost money on property taxes. Even if the bankers were complicit that doesn't excuse the fraud"
X Link 2023-08-31T11:43Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@JCBasinger @KenCox @harrylitman @acoyne @realDonaldTrump @JennaEllisEsq He had the chance and he repeatedly failed to meet his legal obligations. He ALSO conceded that he did in fact do the things he's being sued for (which was pretty well undeniable anyway) but still wanted to pretend he wasn't responsible for what he said and did. He chose this"
X Link 2023-08-31T12:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@iNCNF @ReallyAmerican1 Well you're about a third right - there is a huge conflict.between her desire to uphold the law and his obsession with breaking them. But that's the conflict courts exist for so it's a meaningless point to make"
X Link 2023-09-12T03:17Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@NORSTRAT @JabbaNoBadda @BuddShenkin While I tend to agree there's more to it than that. There's a great deal of propaganda misrepresenting these people as WORTHY of praise when they are more worthy of condemnation - at least the first two. I'm expecting Smith will turn out the same just hasn't happened yet"
X Link 2023-09-16T09:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@korzk1019 @dsamuelsohn Forget about what the banks did - it's illegal for him to lie to them. End of story. Fraud is not about the recipient's due diligence it's about the provider of the information's dishonesty"
X Link 2023-09-29T21:14Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@FrankZYerbouti @AlterEgon75 @RepMeijer @billyez2 Actually they aren't - even if COMPONENTS of those systems are indeed standard. Just look at the other photos showing signs describing a [--] delay on the emergency doors that weren't in the CCTV still. Even if the alarm handle was standard the doors obviously weren't"
X Link 2023-10-01T05:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@parrhizzia Avoiding a govt shutdown ISN'T though. You failed to identify any concrete benefit of the CR to them and it will probably see McCarthy removed. Fallacy is a fallacy - see how useless that argument is Even if it's true this time it demonstrates nothing"
X Link 2023-10-01T07:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@fuddlored @AlanMcQuinn @twobitidiot @JakeSherman Good point but very backwards - the gop controlled committee released the still from the security cameras but by your "logic" - they will never release the full video because it will show his confused attempts to open the door. What a pathetic effort at trolling"
X Link 2023-10-02T10:11Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@SueBailey677 @ChrisDWilk @Angry_Staffer @AskLyft @davidrisher @lyft It looks like they did finally and managed to find Tux alive and relatively well. But they could have handled it much better and much sooner"
X Link 2023-10-02T16:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@BensleyDanny @Carolin33390348 @HansonRitta @kylegriffin1 That's NOT what fraud is it's him lying to them"
X Link 2023-10-02T18:49Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@ColoradoOhio @KarlFNoel @mrusk745 @JakeSherman The CCTV still seems to have been leaked to Jake Sherman who posted it on twitter. That suggests the entire thing was a hit job run at shocking speed"
X Link 2023-10-02T19:31Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@ColoradoOhio @KarlFNoel @mrusk745 @JakeSherman There's no video released - I was referring to the still image taken from the CCTV footage the one that we've all been seeing for the past day day and a half"
X Link 2023-10-02T20:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@JamesClausner @ag2727 @brucemcintyre @lilwvredhead @OccupyDemocrats He's been found liable.isn't "convicted" limited to criminal charges"
X Link 2023-10-04T09:07Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@julesrodrigo @karlmil74490294 @williamlegate @pallee12 Thanks for clarifying the probable mechanism most of us don't deal with loans of that kind I know I don't"
X Link 2023-10-05T11:29Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@ber46899118 @GenghisJon1 @williamlegate And obviously dragging Tesla down in the process. I believe spacex is private so there's no stock market to reflect on its trajectory. Are there any metrics that could show success or otherwise there"
X Link 2023-10-05T12:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@wisconsinlogic @newscollector08 @AC_Californian @TomJChicago I don't know the details of banking regulations but any that failed to do so should be penalised a large % of the loan value for failing to do do. Becomes a lot less profitable to look the other way. But of course I don't expect that to actually happen"
X Link 2023-10-06T05:24Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Sunshin27001268 @PrezLives2022 While an excellent point - he likely doesn't know which ones they got and which ones he was able to hide from them. Of course the whole concept of allowing him access to national security docs he isn't cleared for and is charged with stealing - seems to enable the crime"
X Link 2023-10-07T05:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@swart_dave @FordJohnathan5 Because spies aren't restricted to only looking for evidence they've already identified and shown probable cause that they can be found in specific places. The spies can just look and see what they find unlike the FBI - after all it was only national security at stake"
X Link 2023-10-07T07:00Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@rbpakawok @Mikessanders777 @MalcolmNance Funny how planning to go out to dinner with friends is legal but planning to overthrow the govt or sell national security secrets might just be considered SLIGHTLY more dubious. It's not there's any difference is there"
X Link 2023-10-07T07:16Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@1oldcrazylady @allenanalysis When does the failure to hold an enemy agent/asset accountable become more serious than "oh he has a card up his sleeve" How many years and unpunished crimes does it take to pull the wool from your eyes By which I'm referring specifically to the ones that passed the SoL"
X Link 2023-10-07T08:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@AbeDrayton @Ukrainolution @IAPonomarenko Interesting but obviously biased article. Israel has "gone to war against hamas" Or responded to massive terrorist attacks Israeli short-sightedness might provide some historical context - but they don't control hamas who must be held accountable for their actions"
X Link 2023-10-08T06:08Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@ManoolsAreCool @PonikvarMatt @ma20_ro @MerruX @IAPonomarenko And killing all Israelis/Jews is their explicitly stated reason for existence. Really doesn't leave any room for compromise and their repeated attacks ensure that Israel never leaves them alone. Provoking retaliation is their MO"
X Link 2023-10-08T06:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@PinkPan2121 @IAPonomarenko The parallel you're looking for would be Ukraine occupying russian territory after a counter-attack in response to invasion. gaza the west bank and the golan heights were occupied by Israel when they were invaded. gaza in particular never stops attacking. Total opposite"
X Link 2023-10-08T07:16Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@RoseSpitznogle @58isthenew40 @Angry_Staffer Baffling to see an encyclopaedia weighing in on current events in such detail but it is valuable. I think the 1000:1 prisoner swap and the reference to the wars starting with (hamas) rocket attacks rather highlight the discrepancies. Plus Egypt participate in that blockade"
X Link 2023-10-08T08:42Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@exileddub @Ilya_K_QST @58isthenew40 @stephanie9973 @Angry_Staffer Israel have no real choice faced by repeated terrorist attacks from hamas against civilians which is ALSO a war crime BTW and overshadows war crimes that might occur in retaliation. Even Egypt who invaded Israel in the past help blockade Gaza. That's really very telling"
X Link 2023-10-08T08:45Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@rana215797010 @58isthenew40 @Angry_Staffer And why is one of those borders so tightly secured by one of their previous allies Egypt were an invader of Israel with Syria and Jordan last century. Now they help blockade Gaza. Think it through"
X Link 2023-10-08T08:58Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@jstauf4316 @CraigRozniecki I could see this hurting bibi for exactly that reason. His attack on the supreme court for example doesn't tend to make him a unifying figure to rally around against hamas. More likely it will ensure Israeli unity around someone else. Maybe"
X Link 2023-10-08T09:35Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@SandyShriver9 It possible but after his assault on the supreme court he seems like the least likely candidate for Israelis to rally around. But the hamas attacks almost certainly will reunify Israel which begs the question - why wouldn't they wait as Israel got weaker"
X Link 2023-10-08T09:57Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@JJDragonFire @73RDARM @Cartier Wasn't it the Sims [--] My memory is a little vague"
X Link 2023-10-08T11:20Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@dogefort @RealCynicalFox @nyn1naf0 Not sure that war weakened america to any significant extent. They don't learn well so they had a lot of lessons the taliban and others could teach them.but their domestic divisiveness hurts them far far more than any fight they've chosen on foreign soil"
X Link 2023-10-11T07:51Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@gamblegrl19 @captkrispy @JasmineForUS @Redhaired_Jax And with an R in the chair there aren't even any floor votes that could result in a Jeffries win"
X Link 2023-10-13T12:11Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@Ustad102 @sentdefender Land they vacated a decade and a half ago followed by hamas taking over"
X Link 2023-10-14T18:20Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@JordanDHeath @MohammadIsmae12 @marcgarlasco The hamas-allied group believed to have fired the rocket in question is called 'Palestinian Islamic Jihad' . Twitter encourages people to drop words or abbreviate which can introduce even more confusion"
X Link 2023-10-23T08:03Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@k8sl8on @TonySamBoat @JakeSherman @RedheadRefined Which apartheid aspect of Israel are you referring to Arabs being able to vote there the only place in the middle east they can do so or having two Arabs on their supreme court Excluding those trying to destroy Israel isn't apartheid"
X Link 2023-11-17T09:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@VellCal @PunishedAndhe @Angry_Staffer Amnesty also blamed Ukraine for russian human rights violations in their unjustified invasion of Ukraine - I'm sure there are reports like that but amnesty is not a credible source. Plus the whole trying to eliminate Israel thing - ignoring cause b/c of effect is wrong"
X Link 2023-11-17T13:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@PunishedAndhe @VellCal @Angry_Staffer Sure.that's why the population keeps increasing and Palestinian terrorism has preceded it along with multiple invasions by multiple countries starting from the day Israel was born. Palestinians insist on the removal of Israeli settlements from Israeli land - ethnic cleansing"
X Link 2023-11-19T07:40Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@VellCal @PunishedAndhe @Angry_Staffer And yet there was no country called Palestine prior to that. Ignoring reality to focus on only the narrow timeframe that doesn't quite support your bias doesn't make you right. And international law is one of the dishonest arguments used against Israel so it DOES matter"
X Link 2023-11-19T09:54Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@debstehn @FordJohnathan5 How would it The facts have been established and the text of the amendment has been ignored to justify doing nothing in proclaiming that it doesn't apply to him. An appeal will refuse to reconsider the findings of fact but know at a glance that the findings of law are bogus"
X Link 2023-11-21T21:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@MayaBug2016 @RpsAgainstTrump Tough luck I'm gunna "Like" it even if you tell me not to 😉"
X Link 2023-12-22T07:36Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@TeitokuGou @MoSoApril2019 @MalcolmNance I think you mean something very different - I consider a colony to be somewhere populated by the colonisers not simply foreign controlled as some deem it. My country was largely populated by the British over a century before they took control of BMP after WW I"
X Link 2023-12-24T01:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@SusanMorais @angryarab @orenbarsky Their populations apparently do - but their leaders largely want nothing to do with the destabilising palestinian cause nor invading Israel AGAIN to have their arses handed to them. Nuances"
X Link 2023-12-24T02:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@gufypoopy @wwschmidt @migobril @orenbarsky That's a significant point as it relates to the only period in history that that was a country named palestine rather than simply a region under control of various empires over time"
X Link 2023-12-24T02:11Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@gufypoopy @msonemic @wwschmidt @migobril @orenbarsky If you ever do expound on those details please drop a link. I'm only vaguely aware of them and appreciate honest info from people who really do know what they're talking about. In the interim I'll follow to try not to miss more of your in depth knowledge"
X Link 2023-12-24T04:19Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@msonemic @gufypoopy @wwschmidt @migobril @orenbarsky Guided/smart bombs used in majority of Israeli strikes. Deliberately ignoring the reality for emotive misrepresentation. Supplies of guided munitions are limited forcing Israel to use judgement rather than exclusively pursuing the path you wish"
X Link 2023-12-24T05:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@EdiMA_ @kyledcheney Those who made that determination need to be prosecuted for manslaughter or even murder. There is no possible (justified) protection against prosecution for wilfully and needlessly causing a person's death"
X Link 2024-01-05T20:25Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@CalmUpset @twetienne7 @krassenstein @CantStopMeAgain He hid more than the nature of the operation as did his cohorts in the pentagon. He could easily have referred to a "(minor) medical procedure" without elaborating but hiding the facts from everyone including the prez is inexcusable. The prostate part is irrelevant"
X Link 2024-01-14T00:54Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@JayeJaybird54 That would require self awareness and integrity and consistency - not gunna happen"
X Link 2024-01-15T01:59Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@citrusnewsMO @bd_ecks @hahussain Fascinating detail - I've seen estimates that hamas militants made up around a third of the casualties but suspected it was higher. This provides evidence to support a 50%+ militant rate. But as I read it that's hamas only - so overall the majority would be militants"
X Link 2024-01-29T23:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Public8713 @SarahKa85026145 I have none of that experience either aware of it only through the fiction I read. Even from such a tenuous basis it seems obvious enough. I'm ashamed of those on the left who are too blind to get even the hint of a glimpse at this"
X Link 2024-01-30T01:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@nanomedia1 @BLheureux @NickKnudsenUS You don't really think the white house actually shared ronny's stash with congress do you"
X Link 2024-02-02T02:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@MonicaLogallmon @ACLieberman Of course there's another reason - seeking a judge proven to be biased for the accused. Not even in the court district in which the docs were held which might have had some arguable validity. (I believe cannon's district fielded the GJ but that's just another layer.)"
X Link 2024-02-02T05:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Ty___Webb Meanwhile with [--] seditious governors and none of the instigators of the insurrection being charged the country laughingly known as the "united" states looks on the verge of either collapse or civil war. Arent verges fun You can be almost anywhere and still be on a "verge""
X Link 2024-02-03T00:06Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Hoomanbod @morepuzzled Would that be the war fought by Arabs invading the Jewish half of British Mandate Palestine after they were given the eastern half They were the invaders multiple Arab countries invading Israel the day it was created. And they lost that war like all the others they started"
X Link 2024-02-03T02:04Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@3asef710 @MirabelleW18 And you think being indigenous determines the result of wars That's what this was based on with Britain defeating the Ottoman Turks. That gave them the opportunity just as Arabs lost multiple opportunities in the multiple wars they lost against Israel"
X Link 2024-02-03T08:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Meerkatwonder @Ty___Webb @winnygirl03 Picture Australia's Great Northern Rd [----] km walking along the edge the verge. I rather doubt many of us will live to see anything but that "verge""
X Link 2024-02-04T00:25Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@OfficialT_P_V @KerenZelwer That's not an honest question. hamas are the govt in Gaza conducting govt terrorism against Israel. The contrast you seek to draw is completely dishonest because there is no meaningful similarity. OF COURSE a govt will respond differently in an area they control vs hostile"
X Link 2024-02-04T03:14Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@truebluedoo @OfficialT_P_V @aricfedida @KerenZelwer A reasonable explanation of a couple of the incredible differences that make the two situations world's apart. There are far more differences than the two similarities of hamas + hostages"
X Link 2024-02-04T03:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Jennyil @OfficialT_P_V @KerenZelwer And that military response was deliberately sought for the purpose of undermining public support. Since it was so very deliberate - the entirety of the blame goes to those who sought it hamas. Not Israel for responding largely exactly as hamas desired. The West is being played"
X Link 2024-02-04T03:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@FaerieWhings @KerenZelwer @OfficialT_P_V Last I heard nearly [-----] in total - according to hamas. More than half of which are apparently being buried by hamas as if they're members. ie militants not "civilians". Even if there were a useful distinction between "civilians" and "terrorists""
X Link 2024-02-04T03:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@DianeBernaerts @svdate @AntiToxicPeople Come on Diane please be serious - he knows his cult (and their elected representatives) have no consistency convictions or principles. They're flipping their lies about the trump impeachments to support their lies to excuse the baseless impeachment of Mayorkas. No consistency"
X Link 2024-02-07T08:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@MaryMieze @TomJChicago Actually it's necessary the special counsel challenge appeal dispute and use every procedural or legal resource possible to avoid exactly that. Maybe a CISA court can review it and overrule her or something (I know probably not). Because that might be the only proof"
X Link 2024-02-10T17:01Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Andreas43937443 @CalynaHaunt Sadly I think Biden's too weak and in this regard too similar to garland to respond in that way. He seems too scared of criticism for doing the right thing"
X Link 2024-02-10T19:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@JBellSATX @hugolowell @guardian As I understand it this is only the info about the threats that are already being made to a witness that maga world has already identified - ie limited danger in sharing what isn't secret anyway especially for a witness who should be in protection"
X Link 2024-02-12T15:27Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@FillmoreWhite @Ty22Best @mmpadellan @SenateDems @SenSchumer I can't get on board with this - either it's a valid (unjustified) impeachment in which case it needs to be dismissed at the first opportunity. Or it's NOT and need never be accepted sufficiently to dismiss. Taking this middle ground to push for legislation is unbalanced"
X Link 2024-02-15T15:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@JoJoFromJerz It's those without a single firing synapse who still support all the above that terrify me"
X Link 2024-02-15T16:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@IsolepKcuf @JonCThought @JoJoFromJerz Calling for peace and disbursement Wtf are you on and where can I get some"
X Link 2024-02-15T16:13Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@beach_hermit Which time I mean I could probably look up the figures and tie it to a specific incident but only the figures might narrow that down. Otherwise it describes every mass shooting america has almost every damn day. Civilised countries solve the problem. america never does"
X Link 2024-02-15T21:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@beach_hermit Australia decided after Port Arthur 26+ years ago that we didn't like mass shootings and a conservative PM pushed through major gun reforms. We've had one mass shooting since. A long list of other countries have done the same with similar effect"
X Link 2024-02-15T21:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@scotbutl @moronsdog @DJHuntPCG @PrezLives2022 That was my understanding but apparently the appeals court in his civil fraud case ruled otherwise which I never understood. As both an ongoing crime and a civil matter - I thought the SoL was irrelevant"
X Link 2024-02-18T06:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@dont_atmebro @churchlady320 @ReallyAmerican1 @mmpadellan Not relevant. He claimed in another case to have $400 million in liquid assets and if he has to sell off assets at a loss to cover the ruling too bad. If he can't sell those assets at a loss fast enough to hit the appeal deadline too bad"
X Link 2024-02-23T03:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@DeePleurable @UrwaRajpoot2 @ReallyAmerican1 You have no idea what fraud is. And the banks were defrauded if you look at some reporting about the ruling you'll see a figure in the penalty for interest that was evaded by the fraud you pretend didn't exist. Its a [--] figure amount which the banks lost"
X Link 2024-02-23T03:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@DianaCialino @ConLaw60654 @JenKonitzer @ReallyAmerican1 Is Deutsche Bank chartered in NY Even if they are I'm sure there are money laundering outlets in Cyprus or the UK that would be happy to funnel money from DB with Sberbank again acting as guarantor to DB"
X Link 2024-02-23T03:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@CannaKingCA20 @MaryandWinnie @KatiePhang Because they're in a relationship EXPLICITLY permitted under GA law/regulations You don't even identify what assumptions you're making which drastically multiplies the lack of credibility"
X Link 2024-02-24T05:43Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@rf_in_the_bush @ampalsson @wewatchu2 @superduker1301 We know a certain pacific power bought out the Solomon Islands despite our decades of support for them and trump would probably be cheaper than the SI PM. A few more trademarks for ivanka and he'd probably gift wrap us for them"
X Link 2024-02-25T04:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@CycleGearGuy @Ty___Webb @Michell33650674 Sorry but the Divided States of Anarchy are not a civilised country if they qualify as any kind of real country at all. Daily mass shootings on average when genuinely civilised countries step in to prevent them after the FIRST major incident Sorry not even close to pretend"
X Link 2024-02-25T04:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@ryanstruyk Such countries allow their parliament PM president or governor general (as appropriate) to call the election. Not a traitor seeking to overthrow the duly elected govt AGAIN"
X Link 2024-02-25T04:59Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@nfstxm24hz @AuGeekom The same company offers multiple AMD systems also"
X Link 2024-02-25T05:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@ResearchFacts1 @rawpuck @TrumpIsTheEnemy @meiselasb @drfarmertx Admitting to perjury would make for an interesting start to bankruptcy proceedings. But Barbara Jones is not running anything merely monitoring for the court"
X Link 2024-02-25T05:34Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@dovgvlad @lupinski @JoJoFromJerz But being in a country edging up towards [--] 1/2 mass shootings per day IS something to be proud of Your "pride" seems horrifically tied to mass murder"
X Link 2024-02-27T01:07Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@paulhericsson @MAC_Arms @JoJoFromJerz There's a difference of scale but "gun deaths" include accidents and suicides and they're all made worse by guns"
X Link 2024-02-27T01:18Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@RGuy999 @JoJoFromJerz Gun control doesn't need to "reduce crime" to be valuable - it can save lives even if crime WENT UP. Civilised countries value human life the Divided States of Anarchy aren't civilised"
X Link 2024-02-27T01:20Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@Palau_Tam @har26606511 @maddssnapper @KatiePhang Georgia rules explicitly allow personal relationships. I can't speak to any requirement to disclose it but since they're on the same side it looks like a total beat-up"
X Link 2024-02-27T01:31Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@frankdpi @TheOnion Imagine if that was satire instead of an accurate reflection of the services he provides. Of course the alleged discount is sarcasm.but the rest is accurate"
X Link 2024-02-27T02:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Fixitguy8 @Snarky_gnome @TonyBHMS @aesagt @sentdefender You're presenting the claim you refute it if you can think straight"
X Link 2024-02-27T02:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@_youre_annoying @CandyWagner @KatiePhang Largely because NOTHING you claim has been established not even to a civil probability level. Onky IF your claims are upheld by the court is there anything to excuse. But this is all an unethical attack on the prosecutors with no semblance of justice"
X Link 2024-02-27T02:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@RGuy999 @JoJoFromJerz Crime and gun deaths are different concepts. Even if there were more crime saving lives is worthwhile. Really not that hard unless you have no value for human life or dishonestly equate "crime" with "gun deaths". Which would be a very revealing lie in any case"
X Link 2024-02-27T02:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@dovgvlad @lupinski @JoJoFromJerz Why bother when so many like you support them"
X Link 2024-02-27T02:37Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@truebloodnet @AZCorgiMom @lawofruby Yes and that there is the point - they are twisting things out of shape not taking a rough path to do the right thing"
X Link 2024-02-27T02:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Peter_Speeder1 @JLaneMcMahon @aruby4u @RepRiggleman They could challenge the subpoena and apparently they do so routinely. I doubt they'd face any problems unless they ignored a court order backing up the subpoena. As for Wade (and Willis) being notified - that being required doesn't mean it happened"
X Link 2024-02-27T02:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@thegregoryyoung @EdKrassen @Mari2025z I don't recall seeing the model mentioned are you sure it was a MacBook and new enough to have such protection UEFI and the secure boot process are far from universal in the general PC (rather than Mac) space and I've no idea when that level of security was introduced"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:03Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@blitziod @micktbarnard @Mari2025z @EdKrassen You come close to making a good point. That's confirmation that they've had access to his data - but doesn't confirm where it came from (laptop or hack) nor how much is unchanged. So it wasn't fabricated from scratch - but has definitely been at least somewhat altered. Useless"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:07Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@blitziod @micktbarnard @Mari2025z @EdKrassen Except they AREN'T exposing anything real. You're describing what they should be doing but their fishing expeditions have no sound basis and aren't finding anything real. They can't even clearly identify the basis for impeachment and fail to confirm any allegations"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Tasreme @har26606511 @Mari2025z @EdKrassen The blind repairman confirmed its been altered since he took an image of it and that drive image is what has been shared - and could have been modified at every change of hands. That the FBI reviewed a possibly intact version.proves nothing about any other copy"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:16Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Tasreme @har26606511 @Mari2025z @EdKrassen I've seen only indirect and often vague references to the FBI looking into this - did they examine the physical laptop/drive or an image of it Quite different analyses of each situation.a drive image doesn't have a serial number per se although it could have markers"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:19Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@tim76469823 @Mari2025z @EdKrassen Very true. The extent of the unaltered data and the altered or completely fabricated data is the uncertainty. As is the original source - could have been a hacked iCloud account stolen/copied backup etc. But we do know that what's presented as being on it cannot be trusted"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:25Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Julie2323293244 @DarrenStephano1 @Mari2025z @EdKrassen Which tells you nothing except that someone got access to his data"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@DarrenStephano1 @Julie2323293244 @Mari2025z @EdKrassen A certified Mac repair guy said that MacBook hard drives are soldered to the laptop board so it's all or nothing. But I've seen no confirmed reports about the physical drive or laptop only references to the image of the drive taken by the blind repair guy and disseminated"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@orin_jacobs @Mari2025z @EdKrassen And did they also track the serial number or verify what WASN'T on the laptop/iCloud Because alterations made to a drive image after that lack any of the confirmation you refer to.and may have been all based on hacking that iCloud account. Many limits to this verification"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@MikeZatkovic @Mari2025z @EdKrassen Yes it really doesn't hard"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@DeanJFletcher @scottkanerva @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat The physical item cannot be copied and altered as easily as a digital image. It could also be tracked to a purchase by the serial number. I've seen unconfirmed comments that the FBI collected the laptop in [----] and confirmed it's contents against Hunter's iCloud - which could"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@DeanJFletcher @scottkanerva @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat mean nothing more than someone hacked his iCloud and copied it to a laptop he'd never seen or touched much less owned. Im dubious about the claim - but the laptop itself still proves nothing about the altered contents of the drive images that have been shared widely"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@normbnyc @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat Makes sense but I'm seeing a lot of contradictions about what the FBI checked and confirmed. Almost seems like there should be clear reporting of whatever statement or report the FBI issued. But no-one's linking any"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:40Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Snodevil1 @har26606511 @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat While this may be true mobile "keyboards" make mistakes easier and less obvious than typos on a real keyboard. I spent many many years auto-correcting typos in chat to the extent of not even seeing them but what had been intended because the typos were so consistent. No more"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Deke3516 @CeliaLauer @thetroybarnes1 @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat No there were docs (a conversation of some sort) on the laptop that were faked. An interaction that never occurred not merely a claim made up but fabricated evidence of something that never happened. Subtle but significant difference - if I understand Hunter correctly"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Jesse76330534 @Carrie10231215 @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat Specifics are too easily debunked - but accusations that are too vague to be confirmed OR debunked are obvious lies. Unless they're in clear reference to specifics like a court case"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@al_nahmias @grcflwlkr2 @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat I've seen this said several times do you have links to any reporting on it"
X Link 2024-03-03T09:55Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Arcijay00 @doodaaman @MRS_MRS4 @EdKrassen @DeLawnMuskRat That's interesting but far from convincing. It's political reporting on vague and qualified deductions by someone who should not have been answering questions based on being "fairly certain" who was in a position to know things rather than actual knowledge. Too much is hesrsay"
X Link 2024-03-03T10:04Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@GUSTAVO09184349 @907Bex @EdKrassen You're conflating too many different concepts here. Having abandoned the device he can't blame the shop for deleting the contents. Possession or even ownership of the hardware doesn't grant ANY rights to the contents only to using the storage media for their own purposes"
X Link 2024-03-03T10:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@trevorspoke @tribelaw @XenaWarrior2022 To clarify it absolutely does exist and it absolutely does apply in the terms tribe misused ie "bringing" or commencing the prosecution. Not to the trial dates chosen by the judge which is beyond doj control. So many vague and blatantly obvious inaccuracies"
X Link 2024-03-03T11:54Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Check_ur_source @trevorspoke @tribelaw @XenaWarrior2022 Making tribe's misrepresentation even more egregious. As a supposedly respected lawyer he could reasonably be expected to be aware of this and to have noticed the testimony confirming the existence of the policy he claims doesn't exist - and in fact has that exact meaning"
X Link 2024-03-03T12:06Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@KatiePhang So much clearer and more accurate than Lawrence Tribe claiming the opposite. I'm utterly disgusted by the supposedly respected lawyer"
X Link 2024-03-03T12:08Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@KatiePhang Tribe claims the policy doesn't exist while rephrasing JB's statement to match exactly what the policy DOES say. They can't "bring" a prosecution within [--] days which has nothing to do with the eventual trial dates. Jay Bratt Chief of Counterintelligence at DOJs National Security Division told the court that DOJ has no regulations saying it must refrain from bringing criminal cases against defendants within [--] days of an election. Nor would any such policy be justifiable. Jay Bratt Chief of Counterintelligence at DOJs National Security Division told the court that DOJ has no"
X Link 2024-03-03T12:11Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@kylegriffin1 No-one on scotus believes states are PERMITTED to obey the constitution. Let that sink in. Not a single one of them believes states are allowed to comply with the constitution even if they try. I wonder if any of them have the guts to say "we're following the 14th anyway""
X Link 2024-03-04T20:09Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@palazzo214 @kylegriffin1 I'm not sure it matters - [--] justices believe states are forbidden to comply with the constitution but it's only the constitution that gives scotus any authority. And they've unanimously tossed it in the bin. The USA is dead. Long live the Divided States of Anarchy"
X Link 2024-03-04T20:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@AvivaKlompas @lauferlaw Not the WHOLE world - only the witless wonders blindly accepting terrorist propaganda. I've got things to blame Israel for - ask me after the war after hamas is defeated and the rockets stop. Only then will it be relevant. Until then this is what hamas SOUGHT"
X Link 2024-03-04T21:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@BradMossEsq Scotus just ordered states NOT to comply with the constitution so I don't see why the [--] or any other amendment or section would be relevant. In particular scotus just destroyed their own authority to tell anyone what to do"
X Link 2024-03-04T21:48Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@AJDelgado13 The Divided States of Anarchy are falling apart already - a partisan majority ruling would have been no surprise but unanimous There's no more constitution no more scotus - just momentum and chaos"
X Link 2024-03-04T21:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@syxtoezz @BlackKnight10k I think the text means - this amendment does nothing until congress chooses to implement it and just ignore what we said about a 2/3 majority. Obviously I'm referring to the updated amendment scotus released today - the original says the exact opposite. It takes effect UNLESS"
X Link 2024-03-04T21:52Z [---] followers, [---] engagements
"@groeblbubble @BlackKnight10k Violating the constitution scotus just tore up doesn't help restore it. .but with it torn up and having just failed spectacularly I'm not sure if it can be restored. Plus there's [--] justices who unanimously tossed the constitution out the window"
X Link 2024-03-04T21:54Z [---] followers, [----] engagements
"@nobodycrowley @MerrittKelly1 @kylegriffin1 Absolutely - but sect [--] of the 14th explicitly grants congress the authority to enforce it which I interpret as writing those rules. But they haven't. So there AREN'T any such rules leaving it to each state to apply - or scotus to order all states to apply"
X Link 2024-03-04T21:57Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@ReekOShame @beach_hermit Yeah I'm still processing scotus ordering states to ignore the constitution. It was your point about the swing states that really threw me I've seen too many articles about repubs who won't vote for the traitor to realise things were that dire. Combined with scotus - S#*T"
X Link 2024-03-04T21:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@dsrose @hamburg_steven @harrylitman All it requires is integrity. Congress can enforce the 14th but hasn't passed any such law. In the absence of that authorised law - states should be bound to carry out the requirements of sect [--] as best they can or as ordered by scotus (or congress). Ad hoc by state nothing"
X Link 2024-03-04T23:06Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@brownsfan1414 @EeDiva_ @ElieNYC That's a really pathetic argument. They could only legitimately do that if they could demonstrate he engaged in insurrection - applying it exactly as written doesn't make it universal"
X Link 2024-03-04T23:10Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@jackfro69234272 @harrylitman .according to whom Scotus Who just ordered states to ignore the constitution I'm not sure they have that authority now they've decided it doesn't apply. The only basis for their authority was the document they dismiss"
X Link 2024-03-04T23:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@brownsfan1414 @EeDiva_ @ElieNYC You sound just like an insurrectionist yourself. Scotus job is NOT to he political. They're supposed to uphold the laws and constitution - not rewrite them for political expediency. This ruling may very well cause far worse chaos because it overturns the constitution"
X Link 2024-03-04T23:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@beach_hermit Neither does the doj nor scotus. Does america have any accountability for rich or political criminals Apart from their own party convincing them to resign if they're Democrats. That really doesn't count even if it's better than nothing"
X Link 2024-03-04T23:34Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Thom_Hartmann Congress has to pass a law with simple majorities before the constitution that empowers them to make laws takes effect - and then allows them to change that with a super majority. Or they can just repudiate the constitution like scotus"
X Link 2024-03-04T23:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@Trump202469420 @idummkopp @Thom_Hartmann So you didn't read it or didn't understand Sect explicitly requires a super majority for an exception (otherwise insurrectionists are D/Q). Scotus declared the opposite that the amendment does nothing unless congress decides to. The exception can only fit with self-executing"
X Link 2024-03-04T23:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@PatrickLovell1 @Thom_Hartmann That's why the repudiation of the constitution is so significant. It was a foundation that scotus has just cut away. Very blatantly declaring the opposite of what it says. Not "only DQ if." but "DQ unless a super majority." There's no ambiguity there unless it's added"
X Link 2024-03-04T23:49Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TCantler @VictoryCroi @EricShapiro3 @ElieNYC Exactly why I said a few posts up the chain that the ship had sailed. [--] extra perfectly fit the circuit count and was objectively and clearly justified. It also fit the political aim - but that isn't sufficient. Now [--] extra justices wouldn't restore scotus"
X Link 2024-03-04T23:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@dsrose @hamburg_steven @harrylitman Sure that would work if congress works. But it isn't necessary. Scotus' argument that the amendment doesn't take effect without action by congress allows the disqualification to be be bypassed by inaction - despite the explicit need for a super majority to re-qualify"
X Link 2024-03-05T02:01Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell And which level administers elections is it state or federal Thank you for playing. Candidates aren't federal officials while running for office"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:14Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell The thing is that federal law supercedes state - not that states can't make any laws. In the absence of a relevant federal law state laws apply. Congress rules on disqualification would obviously take precedence - if there were any. But there aren't"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell You do realise we're talking about a constitutional amendment don't you It's not states imposing anything on a higher level of govt - it's states implementing (in the absence of legislation) a rule imposed on the country by the constitution"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:19Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell Even though the exemption in sect [--] is irrelevant since congress hasn't established any disqualification - making that interpretation inconsistent The higher bar for granting an exemption both shows its self-executing and how hard it is to restore eligibility. Already removed"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:22Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell by the constitution - not by any state even if a state complies with the constitution in carrying it out. Consistency matters"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell Then why do you misrepresent the disqualification imposed on states and fed as being applied by a state on a federal position Elections are after all a state responsibility - even if congress has some authority over them they still aren't run by the federal govt"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell This comment shows a clear political bias which you interjected even though term limits have no relevance to the discussion. The disqualification is ALREADY in the constitution. But you don't believe in the constitution"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell I doubt we will ever agree completely but this is close enough. I can't agree that only a federal court can tell a state how to run their elections but I would accept that they could override a state court which is close enough. And the total nonsense definitely"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@LSDSHARP Really gotta wonder what kind of "country" forbids it's states to comply with the constitution. Obeying federal rules is obvious if they exist. But forbidding states from complying as best they can in the absence of such rules.really just repudiates the constitution"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@AshaRangappa_ Apparently since congress hasn't passed legislation to disqualify anyone the constitution is irrelevant - which logically means congress overrides the constitution since they decide whether it gets implemented or just ignore it. But scotus just rewrites it anyway"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:42Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@harrylitman That's a political judgement - that congress can fix if they wish. But the amendment clearly doesn't require congress to implement it even though they can fill in the gaps. But even then they can only tell the states how to implement it since states run the elections"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@justsayit1000 I doubt he ever was - but I'm sure he's still crossing i's and dotting t's. Yes exactly. The wrong way around. If he were trying to get it right he would have by now"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@kylegriffin1 But they did say that states were forbidden to comply with the constitution"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@7Veritas4 He has a dementia ring which prevents a decoder ring from working"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell We're responding out of order - I wrote this before I saw or replied to several other tweets which read very differently"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell Look at this message in the context of the ones preceding it in the chain instead of rage tweeting as you accuse me of. The gratuitous reference to a dem winning [--] terms prompted those comments - very diff't to what you said elsewhere and v diff't to how I responded to that"
X Link 2024-03-05T03:56Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@BradMossEsq Aren't "natural born citizens" in sect [--] of the 14th Or did that just alter it partially I've been brushing past it repeatedly for sects [--] & 5"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:00Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@kylegriffin1 Only that states are forbidden to comply with the constitution in the elections they administer. .unless congress decides to implement the suggestion from the constitution. Is that how it works Sorry I guess it doesn't work at all"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@ChuckHeywood1 @EPICGOPFAIL Or maybe June"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:05Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@glennkirschner2 It's only the constitution - more what you'd call guidelines than actual rules as Barbossa would put it"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:08Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@DianeBernaerts Because america is a house of cards and previous govts/presidents chose to support it. But it depended on that choice and has proven to be too weak and malformed to withstand the opposite"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:10Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@BarbaraVal30691 @DianeBernaerts @USSupremeCourt Or rewrite the constitution and forbid states to comply with it"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:11Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@EricaOfNafo @backroadsrule @emptywheel Possibly or maybe even edited against their will. Invalidating a constitutional amendment they swore to uphold really doesn't leave them any credibility much less enough to challenge the majority that just walked all over them. (Although I did read it as [--] dissents.)"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@PenMandoGorgu @emptywheel @MuellerSheWrote And basic reading comprehension. If people knew what the words meant it could be a little harder to convince them they really mean the exact opposite. Like scotus claiming the 14th does nothing without congress when it only allows them to grant an exception"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:20Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@topherjk @emptywheel @MuellerSheWrote Scotus is a supreme power now not subject to anything not even bound by the constitution they just rewrote. Why would he fold He knows he's untouchable"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@repairrestores1 @emptywheel Sorry but no-one does unless their state grants it. I wish more americans realised the constitution grants that right to states not citizens"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:24Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@tokenvoter420 @LGrosgebauer @emptywheel @DittiePE That phrasing is clarifying - states obviously can't force anyone else to comply.but scotus ordered states to ignore the constitution. States HAVE to implement the disqualification they run the elections. "enforce" is being seriously abused today"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:27Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@el71254 @emptywheel @clalter59 .but there were two separate conclusions with two separate votes. Only one was unanimous - that states cannot comply with the constitution. Seems a little odd though"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@PenMandoGorgu @tommyrulznyc @emptywheel Actually if you read past the waffling about rescheduling etc - the article confirms a deadlock leaves the lower court decision intact"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@rgoodlaw @NevadaAG @AaronDFordNV So what Repeat perjury is only [--] months these days especially when your lawyer refuses to answer the judge's question about the plea negotiation"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:35Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@PortSuccs @rgoodlaw @NevadaAG @AaronDFordNV Timing matters as smirnov might agree"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:37Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@PatriciaShea53 @BruceDuck2 @SusanDu05610431 @rgoodlaw @NevadaAG @AaronDFordNV And once again it's all about the details"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@shellyhughes01 @BruceDuck2 @SusanDu05610431 @rgoodlaw @NevadaAG @AaronDFordNV Flesh pots is that what this Freudian slip was about Perhaps you should flush that dirty mind and get a new one"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:39Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@cabbageridge @rgoodlaw @rhonda_harbison @NevadaAG @AaronDFordNV That's not their job that's why the doj should have handled it. But just as in the disqualification issue in the absence of federal conscientiousness it falls down on the states to carry the load on an ad hoc basis. Unless scotus forbids that"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@WordWanderer @yepsuzn @MartinJmcmah @judgeluttig I believe the person you're replying to is only interested in undue process that provides the results they like. Of course the absence of any rules from congress logically leaves states to comply as best they can. Or did until scotus ordered them to violate the constitution"
X Link 2024-03-05T04:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@KatherineWare1 @pnwaf1212 @lilyvnshtp @judgeluttig They're just like scotus rewriting the constitution to say what they mean because they know it doesn't mean what they say"
X Link 2024-03-05T05:00Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@ScottieP317 @lilyvnshtp @judgeluttig Blame scotus for rewriting the amendment ignoring a requirement that clearly shows it is self-executing and creating one that doesn't exist - while demoting the constitution below the level of legislation"
X Link 2024-03-05T05:10Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@MRpetwir @bsunderlinmsp @TreesB59ABV @judgeluttig I would suggest to you that if they placed any value on consistency they would not have declared an amendment inoperative unless congress allows it - when the amendment explicitly requires a super majority to grant an exception - not inaction"
X Link 2024-03-05T05:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@MRpetwir @bsunderlinmsp @TreesB59ABV @judgeluttig The saddest part here is the suggestion that congress proposing to grant trump an exception could in failing the 2/3 majority disqualify him from running. Even scotus would struggle to dismiss the failure of the exception"
X Link 2024-03-05T05:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@SkolasJohn @TreesB59ABV @judgeluttig That lack of uniformity is the obvious necessary consequence of not having federal rules applying universally. Unless told otherwise - they have to work it out as best they can. Exactly as w/ the 14th until scotus decapitated it"
X Link 2024-03-05T05:35Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@dieselnyc1 @TreesB59ABV @judgeluttig But NOT disqualifying someone requires a 2/3 majority of both chambers of congress. An inconvenient detail scotus seems to have ignored in ruling that the amendment doesn't mean what it says it means"
X Link 2024-03-05T05:37Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@MarkWil75164706 @TreesB59ABV @judgeluttig You haven't actually read it have you It grants authority - not responsibility to do so before the amendment takes effect. Congress is allowed to enforce the rule - but they haven't which doesn't remove the rule - it just leaves states to work out how to comply"
X Link 2024-03-05T05:42Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@bfry1981 @judgeluttig This almost sounds like something the CO supreme court should have considered Oh wait they did. Despite cultists pretending there was no due process"
X Link 2024-03-05T05:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@ObFinancial @SporkboyProton @judgeluttig Well scotus basically ruled the amendment to be meaningless without legislation by congress which would supplant the amendment anyway. So it really doesn't apply to anyone even if later legislation might"
X Link 2024-03-05T05:55Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@a1magfly @politicalblond @judgeluttig @MuellerSheWrote @POTUS Congress actually writes the laws more than obey them (as an institution). It's scotus that needs to obey the law and the constitution instead of rewriting them to achieve political goals without sound legal reasoning"
X Link 2024-03-05T06:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@checkmate95991 @judgeluttig That's backwards. The ruling doesn't grant federal oversight sect [--] already explicitly granted that authority to congress. Scotus has merely forbidden states from complying unless and until a dysfunctional congress can pass a law that scotus could throw out. Again. Again"
X Link 2024-03-05T06:22Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@donnastowe1 @judgeluttig @MuellerSheWrote @tribelaw That's upside down - the amendment doesn't require ANY action to implement it - it actually requires the super majority to grant an exception to the disqualification. Scotus inverted that by declaring the amendment invalid unless congress implements it so no-one is DQ'd"
X Link 2024-03-05T06:31Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@tokenvoter420 @LGrosgebauer @emptywheel @DittiePE Or that the amendment is irrelevant and meaningless and only legislation inspired by it could have any validity. After they apparently tossed a law doing exactly that suggesting that its scotus not the constitution that's invalid"
X Link 2024-03-05T06:39Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@SamiaAliSalama8 @neal_katyal To be fair states can't have the right to ban people from an election - but they must be permitted to remove those constitutionally disqualified. Instead scotus forbids them from doing so and overrides the 14th - inverting the sense of it "DQ unless super majority.""
X Link 2024-03-05T06:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@SnarkyLibruhl @ajg6882 @neal_katyal It just boils down to: is the constitution real or merely a set of guidelines We all know he's DQ'd under sect [--] - and scotus has declared congress the deciders of whether that has meaning. They wouldn't be creating a rule merely implementing one long established"
X Link 2024-03-05T06:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@kylelaine58 @SnarkyLibruhl @kabulykos @neal_katyal So you're saying the CO supreme court didn't reach that conclusion or that you weren't aware of it Because "he wasn't" really won't convince anyone it was inaccurate"
X Link 2024-03-05T06:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@jeannie1003 @NotFunnyAtAll16 @SnarkyLibruhl @neal_katyal Hypothetically that sounds like it fits together. Except scotus has already unilaterally rewritten a constitutional amendment why do you think they'd allow it to be implemented by congress after they sold out and betrayed the constitution"
X Link 2024-03-05T07:00Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@donnastowe1 @judgeluttig @MuellerSheWrote @tribelaw If everyone accepts the obviously invalid ruling. But scotus only has authority because of the constitution they've just repudiated. #DeepTrouble indeed"
X Link 2024-03-05T07:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TOlddude @Anthony60957284 @onewokecitizen @TristanSnell That essentially refers to the process though - if it's law that has to comply with the constitution it's superior in some way. But from what you say I guess a lot less than I thought.really seems like an unnecessary chicken and egg since laws rely on the C'n for validity"
X Link 2024-03-05T07:16Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@zimmy1998 @BradMossEsq Of course that would immediately be challenged and appealed up to scotus who would just move the goalposts again"
X Link 2024-03-05T07:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@vector1928 @BradMossEsq I've been told only 2-3 were charged and the only one convicted was pardoned. (Or very similar to that) It worked because they wanted it to work the exact inverse of now. It would work if scotus allowed it to instead of rewriting it"
X Link 2024-03-05T08:04Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
"@TMarckesano @BradMossEsq Well states are forbidden from doing so according to scotus"
X Link 2024-03-05T08:05Z [---] followers, [--] engagements
Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing
/creator/twitter::GrayElf_