[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @DefiShaka DefiShaka.eth DefiShaka.eth posts on X about $cvxcrv, $crv, $yb, crv the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1273932667/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX +60% - X Month XXXXXX -XX% - X Months XXXXXXX +1,075% - X Year XXXXXXX +768% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1273932667/posts_active)  - X Week XX -XX% - X Month XXX -XX% - X Months XXX +393% - X Year XXX +187% ### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1273932667/followers)  - X Week XXXXX +0.99% - X Month XXXXX +4.30% - X Months XXXXX +9.50% - X Year XXXXX +10% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1273932667/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) XXXXX% [finance](/list/finance) XXXXX% [stocks](/list/stocks) XXXXX% [social networks](/list/social-networks) XXXX% [exchanges](/list/exchanges) XXXX% **Social topic influence** [$cvxcrv](/topic/$cvxcrv) #1, [$crv](/topic/$crv) #54, [$yb](/topic/$yb) #3, [crv](/topic/crv) #303, [$vlcvx](/topic/$vlcvx) #1, [cvx](/topic/cvx) #38, [$cvx](/topic/$cvx) #30, [convex finance](/topic/convex-finance) #30, [$dola](/topic/$dola) #1, [$rsup](/topic/$rsup) #1 **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@convexfinance](/creator/undefined) [@yieldbasis](/creator/undefined) [@votiumprotocol](/creator/undefined) [@dingusprime69](/creator/undefined) [@libertar1en](/creator/undefined) [@stakedaohqs](/creator/undefined) [@stakedaohq](/creator/undefined) [@curvefinance](/creator/undefined) [@cvx_collectiva](/creator/undefined) [@curvecap](/creator/undefined) [@defiorbit](/creator/undefined) [@rektdiomedes](/creator/undefined) [@crediblecrypto](/creator/undefined) [@newmichwills](/creator/undefined) [@crediblecryptos](/creator/undefined) [@xrpworld589](/creator/undefined) [@jongalt14](/creator/undefined) [@panterafii](/creator/undefined) [@0xdefidevin](/creator/undefined) [@crypto_linn](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [Convex CRV (CVXCRV)](/topic/$cvxcrv) [Curve DAO Token (CRV)](/topic/$crv) [YieldBasis (YB)](/topic/$yb) [Convex Finance (CVX)](/topic/$cvx) [DOLA (DOLA)](/topic/$dola) [Stake DAO (SDT)](/topic/$sdt) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "(2/4) Votium $vlCVX Round 111: The large drop in incentives seen in Rounds XXX and XXX are primarily attributed to: * Loss of WFRAX and FXS incentives in XXX & XXX * DOLA incentives dropped XX% in Round XXX On the other hand $YB incentives in Rounds 108-111 have provided a major boost" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1998279811517829538) 2025-12-09T06:33Z 1839 followers, XXX engagements "(3/4) Votium $vlCVX Round 111: This data table shows changes from Round XXX to Round 111: * Total $vlCVX voters jumped XX% although only a X% jump in voters for pools incentivized on Votium. * $DOLA incentives down XX% * $YB incentives down XX% but consistent with Rounds 108-109 * $RSUP incentives down 15%" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1998279813635961331) 2025-12-09T06:33Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements "(1/4) @VotiumProtocol $vlCVX Round XXX Report: * $400.2K (2nd lowest all-time) * $0.0148/vlCVX - 6th lowest all-time - XX% drop from Round XXX * X% more voters than Round XXX (but less than 109) * Drop from Round XXX primarily due to - XX% drop in $DOLA incentives - XX% drop in $YB incentives - XX% drop in $RSUP incentives Full report and graphs below: 👇" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1998279809462677776) 2025-12-09T06:33Z 1839 followers, 2026 engagements "(4/4) Votium $vlCVX Round 111: $400.2K incentives is 2nd lowest all-time $0.0148/vlCVX is X lowest all-time" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1998279815506661696) 2025-12-09T06:33Z 1839 followers, XXX engagements "🚨(1/13) This thread examines how users have lost nearly $100000 converting their $CRV to $cvxCRV at @ConvexFinance which converts at a 1:1 ratio instead of swapping at the market rate. The goal is to educate users encourage improved documentation by @ConvexFinance and ask whether offering a 1:1 conversion option remains responsible when X $cvxCRV is worth about XXX $CRV today. Note: I've mentioned some of this to the team on the @ConvexFinance Discord and they are considering it" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1977633630458454377) 2025-10-13T07:12Z 1838 followers, 31K engagements "(9/13) EXAMPLE 2: User 0xa4cbe661ac. on Dec XX 2024 via Claim Zap V3 contract (0x3f29cB4111.) 1) Claimed/staked a variety of rewards including multiple batches of $CRV totaling 16061 $CRV ($18K) 2) Contract mints 16061 $cvxCRV ($12K; a $6K loss) 3) Contract staked the 16061 $cvxCRV and returned 16061 $stkCvxCrv to the user User loses $6K in value due to 1:1 conversion instead of swapping at market rates. Would have received about 25K $cvxCRV if swapped at market rates" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1977633648838127945) 2025-10-13T07:12Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements "(11/13) APP UI: The @ConvexFinance web application also does a poor job informing users of this 1:1 conversion practice but gets credit for throwing a last-minute warning pop-up right before a user executes a conversion: 1) By default the 1:1 conversion practice is not mentioned at all on the convert/stake page nor on the claim rewards page. 2) On the convert/stake page a warning pop-up will show up if the user a) connects their wallet and b) enters an amount to convert (see image). The content of the pop-up is great but why is it only showing the information AFTER the user has decided to" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1977633653409952230) 2025-10-13T07:13Z 1832 followers, XXX engagements "(12/13) CONCLUSION: @ConvexFinance hard converts $CRV to $cvxCRV at a 1:1 rate losing users 40-70% of the value of their $CRV in the current market environment. Documentation and awareness of this practice is poor and users have lost nearly $100K in value due to this practice over the last year. Easy fixes include updates to documentation and the web UI to better educate users. Perhaps years ago when Ethereum gas prices were higher and $cvxCRV tracked $CRV prices much more closely the "convert and stake" feature saved users money. But in today's environment it's harming users. Updating the" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1977633656375333194) 2025-10-13T07:13Z 1832 followers, 1073 engagements "(13/13) DISCLAIMER: I do my best to be accurate. If you find errors kindly let me know so I can correct them. I'm not a smart contract expert nor a developer. But I do enjoy data analysis and periodically uncover and post about interesting situations like this time in 2023 when OlympusDAO kept getting their vote-locked CVX kicked by a bounty hunter:" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1977633658765980058) 2025-10-13T07:13Z 1832 followers, XXX engagements "I found a single user who lost $100000 converting their $CRV to $cvxCRV at @ConvexFinance which converts at a 1:1 ratio (instead of swapping at the market rate). Etherscan link to the transaction below" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1977954200576561584) 2025-10-14T04:26Z 1837 followers, 9312 engagements "@DingusPrime69_ @ConvexFinance You receive voting rights on @ConvexFinance by vote-locking $CVX not by staking $cvxCRV" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1977957936501785053) 2025-10-14T04:41Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements "@DingusPrime69_ @ConvexFinance @ConvexFinance receives voting rights for its veCRV. It doesn't pass those voting rights on to $cvxCRV stakers" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1977959417648984525) 2025-10-14T04:47Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements "@DingusPrime69_ @ConvexFinance Like I said you get voting rights via vote-locking $CVX ( $vlCVX ) not by staking $cvxCRV" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1977959765407125593) 2025-10-14T04:48Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements "🚨 HOLY UPDATE 🚨 After raising this issue first on Discord and then here on X it appears @ConvexFinance will be compensating users for converting $CRV to $cvxCRV at a 1:1 ratio instead of swapping at the market rate. Cheers to the team for taking this seriously. After posting my thread on this topic I was DMed by one user who discovered they were impacted. Now they are excited they may be compensated Feels good. I still have a few questions since Convex's post didn't really go into any detail but maybe additional info will come out later. 1) Most users were impacted when claiming rewards (vs" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1980843711098732923) 2025-10-22T03:48Z 1837 followers, 4953 engagements "@ConvexFinance posted a clarification that users affected by a bug causing 1:1 conversion of $CRV to $cvxCRV during claiming/staking of rewards will be compensated not users who experience 1:1 conversion when converting/staking" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1981000325982241216) 2025-10-22T14:10Z 1838 followers, 1322 engagements "@defi_orbit @ConvexFinance Not sure sorry. If they are converting $CRV to $cvxCRV for their users via Convex's website or smart contracts maybe its possible" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1981002776802169076) 2025-10-22T14:20Z 1838 followers, 2677 engagements "(1/2) After doing my own due diligence I believe early users of @StakeDAOHQ's liquid locker for @yieldbasis ( $YB $sdYB ) are assuming a medium to high risk of negative market returns: The market is currently pricing liquid locker tokens for vote-escrow protocols at about 40-60% lower than the native token value (e.g. $sdCRV $yCRV $cvxCRV vs. $CRV). No secondary market currently exists for swapping $YB and $sdYB so the "peg" between the native and liquid tokens is unknown. When this secondary market is eventually established it is unknown if the $sdYB value will drop immediately or diverge" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1990269035892838504) 2025-11-17T04:01Z 1837 followers, 7303 engagements "I wish I knew how the market "determined" these things What I do know that even with StakeDAO and Convex driving rewards to the $cvxCRV and $sdCRV pools on Curve the resulting 8-20% APRs are not enough incentive to attract liquidity. Both pools are extremely one sided (only 3-7% $CRV)" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1990283910048366673) 2025-11-17T05:00Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements "This user is now the 5th largest locker of $YB. He keeps withdrawing from Binance and locking. Almost $0.5M locked in total" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1991758701028679857) 2025-11-21T06:40Z 1837 followers, 5955 engagements "$YB lockers looking to get that bread 🍞" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1996248592932278596) 2025-12-03T16:02Z 1837 followers, XXX engagements "@CredibleCrypto has produced one of the best educational videos on @ConvexFinance and $CVX. It breaks down **why** DeFi protocols are paying $CVX holders providing them with passive income. If you are new to the Convex/Curve ecosystem and need a guide this is one of the best places to start. 🤙" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1996394744688398571) 2025-12-04T01:42Z 1836 followers, XXX engagements "UPDATE: The @StakeDAOHQ secondary market for their @yieldbasis liquid locker ( $sdYB / $YB ) just dropped on Curve about X hours ago. Let's use this example to continue my user education series on Liquid Locker risks. Links for previous posts below. 0) Remember the liquid lockers under discussion keep the native tokens that users deposit FOREVER.the users never get them back. So the protocols assume zero direct financial risk of a potential "depeg" of the native vs liquid token while the user takes the entire risk of the market valuation of the liquid token. 1) The new $sdYB / $YB pool on" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1996426317122982095) 2025-12-04T03:48Z 1836 followers, 5539 engagements "The largest @yieldbasis incentives of any @VotiumProtocol round so far were just deposited Round 110: 164K $YB per pool Round 109: 103K $YB per pool Round 108: 117K $YB per pool" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1992846098386599976) 2025-11-24T06:41Z 1838 followers, 8842 engagements "@CredibleCrypto's educational video on @ConvexFinance and earning passive income on your $CVX:" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1996395110242848948) 2025-12-04T01:44Z 1837 followers, XXX engagements "(5/4) Votium $vlCVX Round 111: APR for Round XXX is still about XX% (assuming a $CVX price of $1.80)" [X Link](https://x.com/DefiShaka/status/1998280930805559570) 2025-12-09T06:37Z 1839 followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@DefiShaka DefiShaka.eth
DefiShaka.eth posts on X about $cvxcrv, $crv, $yb, crv the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +60%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXXX +1,075%
- X Year XXXXXXX +768%
Mentions: XX #
- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XXX -XX%
- X Months XXX +393%
- X Year XXX +187%
Followers: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXX +0.99%
- X Month XXXXX +4.30%
- X Months XXXXX +9.50%
- X Year XXXXX +10%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence
Social category influence cryptocurrencies XXXXX% finance XXXXX% stocks XXXXX% social networks XXXX% exchanges XXXX%
Social topic influence $cvxcrv #1, $crv #54, $yb #3, crv #303, $vlcvx #1, cvx #38, $cvx #30, convex finance #30, $dola #1, $rsup #1
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @convexfinance @yieldbasis @votiumprotocol @dingusprime69 @libertar1en @stakedaohqs @stakedaohq @curvefinance @cvx_collectiva @curvecap @defiorbit @rektdiomedes @crediblecrypto @newmichwills @crediblecryptos @xrpworld589 @jongalt14 @panterafii @0xdefidevin @crypto_linn
Top assets mentioned Convex CRV (CVXCRV) Curve DAO Token (CRV) YieldBasis (YB) Convex Finance (CVX) DOLA (DOLA) Stake DAO (SDT)
Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"(2/4) Votium $vlCVX Round 111: The large drop in incentives seen in Rounds XXX and XXX are primarily attributed to: * Loss of WFRAX and FXS incentives in XXX & XXX * DOLA incentives dropped XX% in Round XXX On the other hand $YB incentives in Rounds 108-111 have provided a major boost"
X Link 2025-12-09T06:33Z 1839 followers, XXX engagements
"(3/4) Votium $vlCVX Round 111: This data table shows changes from Round XXX to Round 111: * Total $vlCVX voters jumped XX% although only a X% jump in voters for pools incentivized on Votium. * $DOLA incentives down XX% * $YB incentives down XX% but consistent with Rounds 108-109 * $RSUP incentives down 15%"
X Link 2025-12-09T06:33Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements
"(1/4) @VotiumProtocol $vlCVX Round XXX Report: * $400.2K (2nd lowest all-time) * $0.0148/vlCVX - 6th lowest all-time - XX% drop from Round XXX * X% more voters than Round XXX (but less than 109) * Drop from Round XXX primarily due to - XX% drop in $DOLA incentives - XX% drop in $YB incentives - XX% drop in $RSUP incentives Full report and graphs below: 👇"
X Link 2025-12-09T06:33Z 1839 followers, 2026 engagements
"(4/4) Votium $vlCVX Round 111: $400.2K incentives is 2nd lowest all-time $0.0148/vlCVX is X lowest all-time"
X Link 2025-12-09T06:33Z 1839 followers, XXX engagements
"🚨(1/13) This thread examines how users have lost nearly $100000 converting their $CRV to $cvxCRV at @ConvexFinance which converts at a 1:1 ratio instead of swapping at the market rate. The goal is to educate users encourage improved documentation by @ConvexFinance and ask whether offering a 1:1 conversion option remains responsible when X $cvxCRV is worth about XXX $CRV today. Note: I've mentioned some of this to the team on the @ConvexFinance Discord and they are considering it"
X Link 2025-10-13T07:12Z 1838 followers, 31K engagements
"(9/13) EXAMPLE 2: User 0xa4cbe661ac. on Dec XX 2024 via Claim Zap V3 contract (0x3f29cB4111.) 1) Claimed/staked a variety of rewards including multiple batches of $CRV totaling 16061 $CRV ($18K) 2) Contract mints 16061 $cvxCRV ($12K; a $6K loss) 3) Contract staked the 16061 $cvxCRV and returned 16061 $stkCvxCrv to the user User loses $6K in value due to 1:1 conversion instead of swapping at market rates. Would have received about 25K $cvxCRV if swapped at market rates"
X Link 2025-10-13T07:12Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements
"(11/13) APP UI: The @ConvexFinance web application also does a poor job informing users of this 1:1 conversion practice but gets credit for throwing a last-minute warning pop-up right before a user executes a conversion: 1) By default the 1:1 conversion practice is not mentioned at all on the convert/stake page nor on the claim rewards page. 2) On the convert/stake page a warning pop-up will show up if the user a) connects their wallet and b) enters an amount to convert (see image). The content of the pop-up is great but why is it only showing the information AFTER the user has decided to"
X Link 2025-10-13T07:13Z 1832 followers, XXX engagements
"(12/13) CONCLUSION: @ConvexFinance hard converts $CRV to $cvxCRV at a 1:1 rate losing users 40-70% of the value of their $CRV in the current market environment. Documentation and awareness of this practice is poor and users have lost nearly $100K in value due to this practice over the last year. Easy fixes include updates to documentation and the web UI to better educate users. Perhaps years ago when Ethereum gas prices were higher and $cvxCRV tracked $CRV prices much more closely the "convert and stake" feature saved users money. But in today's environment it's harming users. Updating the"
X Link 2025-10-13T07:13Z 1832 followers, 1073 engagements
"(13/13) DISCLAIMER: I do my best to be accurate. If you find errors kindly let me know so I can correct them. I'm not a smart contract expert nor a developer. But I do enjoy data analysis and periodically uncover and post about interesting situations like this time in 2023 when OlympusDAO kept getting their vote-locked CVX kicked by a bounty hunter:"
X Link 2025-10-13T07:13Z 1832 followers, XXX engagements
"I found a single user who lost $100000 converting their $CRV to $cvxCRV at @ConvexFinance which converts at a 1:1 ratio (instead of swapping at the market rate). Etherscan link to the transaction below"
X Link 2025-10-14T04:26Z 1837 followers, 9312 engagements
"@DingusPrime69_ @ConvexFinance You receive voting rights on @ConvexFinance by vote-locking $CVX not by staking $cvxCRV"
X Link 2025-10-14T04:41Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements
"@DingusPrime69_ @ConvexFinance @ConvexFinance receives voting rights for its veCRV. It doesn't pass those voting rights on to $cvxCRV stakers"
X Link 2025-10-14T04:47Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements
"@DingusPrime69_ @ConvexFinance Like I said you get voting rights via vote-locking $CVX ( $vlCVX ) not by staking $cvxCRV"
X Link 2025-10-14T04:48Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements
"🚨 HOLY UPDATE 🚨 After raising this issue first on Discord and then here on X it appears @ConvexFinance will be compensating users for converting $CRV to $cvxCRV at a 1:1 ratio instead of swapping at the market rate. Cheers to the team for taking this seriously. After posting my thread on this topic I was DMed by one user who discovered they were impacted. Now they are excited they may be compensated Feels good. I still have a few questions since Convex's post didn't really go into any detail but maybe additional info will come out later. 1) Most users were impacted when claiming rewards (vs"
X Link 2025-10-22T03:48Z 1837 followers, 4953 engagements
"@ConvexFinance posted a clarification that users affected by a bug causing 1:1 conversion of $CRV to $cvxCRV during claiming/staking of rewards will be compensated not users who experience 1:1 conversion when converting/staking"
X Link 2025-10-22T14:10Z 1838 followers, 1322 engagements
"@defi_orbit @ConvexFinance Not sure sorry. If they are converting $CRV to $cvxCRV for their users via Convex's website or smart contracts maybe its possible"
X Link 2025-10-22T14:20Z 1838 followers, 2677 engagements
"(1/2) After doing my own due diligence I believe early users of @StakeDAOHQ's liquid locker for @yieldbasis ( $YB $sdYB ) are assuming a medium to high risk of negative market returns: The market is currently pricing liquid locker tokens for vote-escrow protocols at about 40-60% lower than the native token value (e.g. $sdCRV $yCRV $cvxCRV vs. $CRV). No secondary market currently exists for swapping $YB and $sdYB so the "peg" between the native and liquid tokens is unknown. When this secondary market is eventually established it is unknown if the $sdYB value will drop immediately or diverge"
X Link 2025-11-17T04:01Z 1837 followers, 7303 engagements
"I wish I knew how the market "determined" these things What I do know that even with StakeDAO and Convex driving rewards to the $cvxCRV and $sdCRV pools on Curve the resulting 8-20% APRs are not enough incentive to attract liquidity. Both pools are extremely one sided (only 3-7% $CRV)"
X Link 2025-11-17T05:00Z 1838 followers, XXX engagements
"This user is now the 5th largest locker of $YB. He keeps withdrawing from Binance and locking. Almost $0.5M locked in total"
X Link 2025-11-21T06:40Z 1837 followers, 5955 engagements
"$YB lockers looking to get that bread 🍞"
X Link 2025-12-03T16:02Z 1837 followers, XXX engagements
"@CredibleCrypto has produced one of the best educational videos on @ConvexFinance and $CVX. It breaks down why DeFi protocols are paying $CVX holders providing them with passive income. If you are new to the Convex/Curve ecosystem and need a guide this is one of the best places to start. 🤙"
X Link 2025-12-04T01:42Z 1836 followers, XXX engagements
"UPDATE: The @StakeDAOHQ secondary market for their @yieldbasis liquid locker ( $sdYB / $YB ) just dropped on Curve about X hours ago. Let's use this example to continue my user education series on Liquid Locker risks. Links for previous posts below. 0) Remember the liquid lockers under discussion keep the native tokens that users deposit FOREVER.the users never get them back. So the protocols assume zero direct financial risk of a potential "depeg" of the native vs liquid token while the user takes the entire risk of the market valuation of the liquid token. 1) The new $sdYB / $YB pool on"
X Link 2025-12-04T03:48Z 1836 followers, 5539 engagements
"The largest @yieldbasis incentives of any @VotiumProtocol round so far were just deposited Round 110: 164K $YB per pool Round 109: 103K $YB per pool Round 108: 117K $YB per pool"
X Link 2025-11-24T06:41Z 1838 followers, 8842 engagements
"@CredibleCrypto's educational video on @ConvexFinance and earning passive income on your $CVX:"
X Link 2025-12-04T01:44Z 1837 followers, XXX engagements
"(5/4) Votium $vlCVX Round 111: APR for Round XXX is still about XX% (assuming a $CVX price of $1.80)"
X Link 2025-12-09T06:37Z 1839 followers, XXX engagements