Dark | Light
# ![@ChrisGloninger Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::411023941.png) @ChrisGloninger Chris Gloninger, CCM, CBM

Chris Gloninger, CCM, CBM posts on X about science, solar, in the, this is the most. They currently have [------] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [------] engagements in the last [--] hours.

### Engagements: [------] [#](/creator/twitter::411023941/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::411023941/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- [--] Week [---------] +9,481%
- [--] Month [---------] +29,338%
- [--] Months [---------] -78%
- [--] Year [----------] +538%

### Mentions: [--] [#](/creator/twitter::411023941/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::411023941/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- [--] Week [--] +275%
- [--] Month [---] +930%
- [--] Months [---] +9.50%
- [--] Year [---] +11%

### Followers: [------] [#](/creator/twitter::411023941/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::411023941/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- [--] Week [------] +21%
- [--] Month [------] +22%
- [--] Months [------] +21%
- [--] Year [------] +31%

### CreatorRank: [-------] [#](/creator/twitter::411023941/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::411023941/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[countries](/list/countries)  9.4% [stocks](/list/stocks)  5.13% [finance](/list/finance)  #5880 [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  4.27% [social networks](/list/social-networks)  3.42% [travel destinations](/list/travel-destinations)  1.71% [musicians](/list/musicians)  1.71% [automotive brands](/list/automotive-brands)  1.71%

**Social topic influence**
[science](/topic/science) #977, [solar](/topic/solar) #1584, [in the](/topic/in-the) 6.84%, [this is](/topic/this-is) 5.98%, [gas](/topic/gas) #801, [sea](/topic/sea) #1678, [wrong](/topic/wrong) #868, [the world](/topic/the-world) #1464, [history](/topic/history) 4.27%, [balance](/topic/balance) 4.27%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@grok](/creator/undefined) [@gilles_borghese](/creator/undefined) [@adamlje](/creator/undefined) [@vincentjcurtis1](/creator/undefined) [@hansensb2](/creator/undefined) [@nonstopbutterc1](/creator/undefined) [@beevee23](/creator/undefined) [@hormingze1988](/creator/undefined) [@jtb1318](/creator/undefined) [@cogitoinga](/creator/undefined) [@coastlinkr](/creator/undefined) [@bukvarevicedim](/creator/undefined) [@carrick510](/creator/undefined) [@covid_quest](/creator/undefined) [@rdqblueridge](/creator/undefined) [@spacefuckerspod](/creator/undefined) [@tjgelliott_tim](/creator/undefined) [@dmac0123](/creator/undefined) [@longambergris](/creator/undefined) [@henthor70](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL)](/topic/$googl) [Toyota Motor Corporation (TM)](/topic/$tm)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"I am too exhausted to produce a video factchecking Lucy's BS. so here is this fact check: "CO is not a pollutant" Let's start with the science Lucy has no background in: The sun heats the Earth's surface with shortwave radiation. The Earth then radiates that energy back toward space as longwave infrared radiation. CO molecules absorb that outgoing infrared energy specifically at the 15-micrometer wavelength band and re-emit it in all directions including back toward the surface. This traps heat that would otherwise escape to space. More CO means more energy trapped. More energy trapped means"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022671524084285787)  2026-02-14T13:57Z 11.1K followers, 31.8K engagements


"Think about this for a second. Thousands of PhDs around the world - people who spent 8-10 years in school and make $60-80K running climate models - all independently "made up" the same crisis Meanwhile the fossil fuel industry pulling in $4+ trillion a year in revenue is the one telling you it's all fake. Ask yourself who actually has the financial motive to lie here. The scientist driving a 10-year-old Civic to their university lab or ExxonMobil - which by the way their own internal research in the 1970s-80s accurately predicted the warming we're seeing today and they buried it As for"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2023033622744207370)  2026-02-15T13:56Z 11.1K followers, 113.8K engagements


"Stephen Miller a poli sci major who wrote a college column defending tobacco companies forgot to take his LSAT landed on the Southern Poverty Law Center's extremist list and is best known for separating children from their families wants you to know he just pulled off "the single largest deregulatory action in history." He deregulated your right to breathe clean air. The Endangerment Finding he killed was upheld by the Supreme Court the D.C. Circuit and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences last year. Coal PM2.5 has killed [------] Americans. It's 2.1x deadlier than other air"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022121825828802792)  2026-02-13T01:33Z 11.1K followers, 11K engagements


"Mr. Wielicki just posted a graph showing CO2 was higher [---] million years ago and thought he ended the climate debate. Let's talk about what else was happening when CO2 was at 4000+ ppm: There were no humans. No mammals. No birds. The continents were in completely different positions. There were no polar ice caps. Sea levels were hundreds of feet higher. And the sun was actually dimmer which means it took MORE CO2 to warm the planet back then not less. You're literally showing us a graph of a planet that would be uninhabitable for human civilization and saying 'see It was fine' Fine for who"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022705778428088399)  2026-02-14T16:13Z 11.1K followers, 77.2K engagements


"Oh you're right Chris Al Gore has been saying this for [--] years. Let's check how that grift is going: [----] hottest year ever recorded. Oops. [----] third-hottest ever. During a La Nia. Double oops. Last [--] years the [--] warmest on record. Back to back to back to back to back to back to back to back to back to back to back. CO 420+ ppm. Highest in [------] years. Western U.S. snowpack lowest ever recorded. [--] billion-dollar weather disasters in one year. Home insurance collapsing in entire states. Arctic sea ice maximum lowest ever recorded in [----]. Greenland ice sheet 81% surface melt in July."  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022712356137025995)  2026-02-14T16:39Z 11.1K followers, 474.8K engagements


"This post contains a fundamental logical error that either reflects a genuine misunderstanding of economics or is deliberately misleading. Let's walk through it. The counterfactual fallacy. The study doesn't claim wages went down. It claims wages would have been even higher without climate impacts. Saying "wages doubled therefore climate change had no effect" is like saying "I ran a mile in [--] minutes with a sprained ankle therefore the sprained ankle didn't slow me down." Growth and drag can coexist. This is basic economics. The nominal wage trick. Citing wages going from $32155 to $69847"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2023062871983177786)  2026-02-15T15:52Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Global Greening doesnt cancel Global Warming Biggers is back Yes CO makes plants grow. It also makes heat waves droughts wildfires crop failures and flooding worse. Thats not a win. #climatechange #climateaction #factcheck #science #STEM"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2018450212264489274)  2026-02-02T22:23Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"This is what happens when someone trained to read rocks tries to opine on atmospheric physics. Climate science isnt vibes or Holocene cherry-pickingits radiative forcing thermodynamics fluid dynamics and calculus. Lots of it. Youre outside your lane. Geologist Ian Plimer: "We have been cooling down for the last [----] years. It's all about when you start the measurements." https://t.co/nR7xmKTcLA Geologist Ian Plimer: "We have been cooling down for the last [----] years. It's all about when you start the measurements." https://t.co/nR7xmKTcLA"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020136010105880910)  2026-02-07T14:02Z [----] followers, 15.4K engagements


"If youre a climate denier trying to explain #ClimateChange to an atmospheric or climate scientist youd better understand: radiative transfer equations optical depth line-by-line spectroscopy thermodynamics fluid dynamics and calculus-based energy balance. Otherwise youre not debating youre guessing. @ChrisGloninger Here 👇 I fixed your header. https://t.co/PKIOXUgCWA @ChrisGloninger Here 👇 I fixed your header. https://t.co/PKIOXUgCWA"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020158026418655654)  2026-02-07T15:29Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@Henthor70 It's sad because you can't explain a single equation I posted"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020176053310800002)  2026-02-07T16:41Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"When equations feel like looking superior its usually because youre underqualified. CO forcing isnt an opinion and climate history doesnt rescue ignorance. @ChrisGloninger You dont have any idea how to convince people dont you By showing the basic equations for atmospheric science and trying to look superior Denying that there is no correlation over earths history Think again @ChrisGloninger You dont have any idea how to convince people dont you By showing the basic equations for atmospheric science and trying to look superior Denying that there is no correlation over earths history Think"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020184519152935068)  2026-02-07T17:14Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Arctic amplification destabilizes the jet streambasic physics. Go back to posting 384-hour GFS snowfall fantasies instead of laundering junk from CFACT. ANYONE PUSHING MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING AS THE REASON FOR THE COLD IS EITHER LYING OR IGNORANT. From Aug 29th highlighted what was on the table. Set the trap for them during the Christmas heatwave. https://t.co/BM0BLFrCip https://t.co/d07mAAIbtj ANYONE PUSHING MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING AS THE REASON FOR THE COLD IS EITHER LYING OR IGNORANT. From Aug 29th highlighted what was on the table. Set the trap for them during the Christmas heatwave."  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020331139190432183)  2026-02-08T02:57Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"You can scroll my feed and see the peer-reviewed research datasets and radiative-transfer fundamentals laid out repeatedly. Instead you choose intellectual laziness and follow blindly while pretending this is about ad hominem. Shewcuck doesnt get a serious response because he hasnt made a serious scientific argument in yearsjust recycled denial talking points that collapse the moment real data enters the conversation. @ChrisGloninger @_ClimateCraze So you make an ad hominem rather than a real argument. Noted. Shewchuk has seen this before time to bow out gracefully. @ChrisGloninger"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020494579644993640)  2026-02-08T13:47Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"My family has been here since the founding era the very people who built the framework of this country and even they understood that America was meant to grow through new generations of immigrants seeking opportunity. If the same door that welcomed your family had been slammed shut back then you wouldnt be here telling others they dont belong. Thats the difference between understanding American history and rewriting it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020588973555417286)  2026-02-08T20:02Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Climate change is global not local. Arctic sea ice extent: 4th lowest on record Global temps: 4th warmest start to February One cold day somewhere doesnt change the planetary trend. #climatechange"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020604317821268296)  2026-02-08T21:03Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"A warming planet is putting the future of the Winter Olympics at risk. The unusual warmth currently affecting Milan is [--] more likely because of human-caused climate change - a preview of what many future host cities may face. #Olympics #WinterOlympics #MilanoCortina2026 #Olympics2026 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020606084499612021 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020606084499612021"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020606084499612021)  2026-02-08T21:10Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Cherry-picking Lets try basic climatology. Antarctic sea ice is highly variable year-to-year because its dominated by wind-driven circulation and ocean dynamics while Arctic sea ice shows a clear long-term collapse driven by amplified polar warming. When you look at the global cryosphere total sea-ice extent is still trending down not doing just fine. Pointing to a short-term regional fluctuation while ignoring the long-term global decline isnt scientific skepticism its textbook cherry-picking. If you want the full picture look at global sea-ice trends not the one dataset you think sounds"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020617289763316086)  2026-02-08T21:54Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Main stage: Bad Bunny what makes America great. TPUSAs counter-show: a red neck with a guitar yelling at diversity. #SuperBowl #TPUSAHalftimeShow #"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020669779078529246)  2026-02-09T01:23Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Main stage: Bad Bunny what makes America great. TPUSAs counter-show: a red neck with a guitar yelling at diversity. Watch now The All-American Halftime Show Watch now The All-American Halftime Show"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020671603529400702)  2026-02-09T01:30Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Watching MAGA melt down over diversity taking the main stage might be the most entertaining halftime show of all. #SuperBowl"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020672736465412165)  2026-02-09T01:34Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Watching MAGA melt down over diversity taking the main stage might be the most entertaining halftime show of all. Whoevers idea it was to do the Superbowls Halftime show in all Spanish should be fired. Whoevers idea it was to do the Superbowls Halftime show in all Spanish should be fired"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020685936825192889)  2026-02-09T02:27Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Let me stop you right there. You're about to argue that atmospheric absorption somehow invalidates this but it's literally the opposite. The equation accounts for the atmosphere through the F term and the effective radiating temperature. On the Moon: no atmosphere surface radiates directly to space. On Earth: greenhouse gases absorb outgoing IR re-emit in all directions raise the effective radiating altitude. This isn't an 'assumption' it's measured physics. We observe the atmospheric absorption spectrum. We measure outgoing longwave radiation from satellites. The equation works because we"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021366111300649351)  2026-02-10T23:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"You just described the greenhouse effect while trying to disprove it. Yes the effective radiating temperature (255K) occurs at altitude (5-6km) not the surface. That's BECAUSE greenhouse gases absorb surface radiation and re-emit at altitude. The surface must be warmer than 255K to drive enough heat flux upward. The adiabatic lapse rate (T/z [----] K/km) is SET BY atmospheric composition. More CO higher radiating altitude warmer surface to maintain the same outgoing radiation. You've literally just explained why adding greenhouse gases warms the surface. This isn't a gotcha. This is"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021368496852963769)  2026-02-10T23:39Z 10.9K followers, [--] engagements


"N and O heat up through collisional energy transfer (conduction/convection) not direct radiative absorption. Here's the process: 1IR-active gases (CO HO CH) absorb outgoing longwave radiation 2These excited molecules collide with N/O 3Kinetic energy transfers through molecular collisions (thermalization) 4The entire atmosphere heats via conduction/convection N and O are radiatively transparent to IR (homonuclear diatomic molecules have no dipole moment - can't absorb IR). But they still gain thermal energy from collisions with IR-active gases and from contact with the warm surface. This is"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021382013446431050)  2026-02-11T00:33Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"N and O don't radiate their heat to space directly - that's the entire point of the greenhouse effect. Here's the actual process: How atmospheric heat reaches space: 1N/O gain heat through collisions with IR-active gases and the surface 2N/O transfer that energy BACK to IR-active gases (CO HO) through collisions 3IR-active gases radiate to space from the upper atmosphere (5-6km altitude at 255K) 4Surface must be warmer (288K) to drive enough upward heat flux (via convection and radiation) to maintain this N and O act as thermal ballastthey hold heat but can't radiate it efficiently. Energy"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021382599336190224)  2026-02-11T00:35Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Congrats on not understanding the difference between forcing and feedback. Water vapor: - Atmospheric residence time: [--] days - Concentration controlled by temperature (Clausius-Clapeyron relation) - Cannot drive long-term climate change because it rains out - Acts as a feedback amplifier (2x multiplier on CO warming) CO: - Atmospheric residence time: 100-1000 years - Concentration controlled by emissions not temperature - Drives long-term forcing that kicks off warming - Water vapor then amplifies it The Stefan-Boltzmann equation says NOTHING about individual gases having 'zero effect.' It"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021383342575202765)  2026-02-11T00:38Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"I already explained this. You either didn't read it or didn't understand it. I'll say it ONE more time: Energy in N/O returns to space via: [--]. N/O collide with IR-active gases (CO HO) [--]. Energy transfers from N/O greenhouse gases through molecular collisions [--]. IR-active gases radiate that energy to space from the upper atmosphere [--]. This is the ONLY pathwayN/O cannot radiate IR efficiently themselves 'How much energy is in N/O' The atmosphere's total heat capacity is dominated by N/O (99% by volume). But the RATE of energy loss to space is controlled by IR-active gases not total heat"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021387094694731869)  2026-02-11T00:53Z 10.3K followers, [--] engagements


"Oh the 'Cutting Through The Noise' Gish gallop. Let me save everyone time: That website is a curated list of cherry-picked papers many of which: [--]. Don't actually dispute anthropogenic warming (they're about regional variability paleoclimate solar cyclesnormal science) [--]. Are published in predatory/low-impact journals (not Nature/Science/GRL) [--]. Have been debunked in subsequent literature [--]. Misrepresent their own findings when cited by deniers I can list 30000+ peer-reviewed papers supporting anthropogenic climate change. Guess what wins The overwhelming scientific consensus. 'If the"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021388175994675399)  2026-02-11T00:57Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@twit4thot You seem to want to blame me for what might actually be my professors inadequacies. Then delete the quote retweet trying to make it seem like I dont know what Im talking about. Thats how all this started"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021388489259089934)  2026-02-11T00:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"This is dangerous misinformation from a geologist with [--] papers and zero climate expertise. Let me correct the record: ❌ 'Endangerment Finding was conclusion-first science' ✅ Built on decades of peer-reviewed research IPCC assessments and [--] independent lines of evidence ❌ 'Little Ice Age recovery explains warming' ✅ LIA was regional (Europe/N. America) not global. Current warming is global 10x faster and caused by measured CO increase with fossil fuel isotopic signature ❌ 'CO was higher in the past so 420ppm is fine' ✅ Past high CO = no ice caps sea level +200m mass extinctions during rapid"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021391792378171582)  2026-02-11T01:12Z 10.2K followers, [----] engagements


"You're asking good mechanistic questions so let me explain why your proposed alternative doesn't work: Your model: 'Just heat N/O at surface convect upward radiate from greenhouse gases at altitude' This DOES happen. It's called the convective heat flux (97 W/m in Trenberth diagrams). But it's not enough by itself. Here's why back-radiation matters: Without greenhouse gases: [--]. Surface radiates [---] W/m directly to space (Stefan-Boltzmann at 288K) [--]. Atmosphere is transparent to this radiation [--]. Surface cools rapidly [--]. Surface temperature drops to 255K (-18C) to balance incoming solar With"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021393444560613426)  2026-02-11T01:18Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"You're ALMOST there but missing the key point. Yes radiation to space occurs from altitude where greenhouse gases are sparse enough that photons escape (effective radiating level 5-6km 255K). But here's what you're missing: MORE CO higher effective radiating altitude colder radiating temperature surface must warm MORE to drive enough upward heat flux. It's not about "making a difference up there" it's about what surface temperature is REQUIRED to push enough energy through the atmospheric column to radiate [---] W/m to space. More greenhouse gas = higher bottleneck = warmer surface needed."  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021409369598865831)  2026-02-11T02:22Z 10.9K followers, [--] engagements


"Shewcuck posted a graph that is designed to trick you It shows [---] MILLION years of CO variation to make today's spike look normal. But at this scale the entire industrial revolution is 0.00003% of the x-axisliterally invisible. Let me show you what this graph is hiding: RATE OF CHANGE MATTERS Natural CO changes on this graph: Millions of years Current CO change: [---] years (280420 ppm) We're forcing change 100-1000x FASTER than anything shown here. If you zoomed in to show the current spike it would look like a VERTICAL LINE. But CO was higher before" Yeah and when it was: No ice caps"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021409446052712949)  2026-02-11T02:22Z 10.2K followers, 22.5K engagements


""Formulas aren't magic spells" Correct. They're physics. The same physics that lets you use your phone fly in planes and receive GPS signals. "NOTHING proves anthropogenic climate change" FALSE. Here's what proves it: [--]. Isotopic fingerprint: Atmospheric CO shows C13 depletionunique signature of fossil fuels [--]. Mass balance: We've emitted [---] trillion tons CO. Atmosphere gained [--] trillion tons. Ocean absorbed the rest (measured pH drop) [--]. Spectroscopy: Satellites measure REDUCED outgoing IR in CO absorption bands exactly where physics predicts [--]. Attribution studies: Remove anthropogenic"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021410717077848409)  2026-02-11T02:27Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


""Claiming we understand energy balance means no need to research it" This is profoundly stupid logic. We've understood gravity since Newton (1687). Still researching it (LIGO gravitational waves dark matter). We've understood evolution since Darwin (1859). Still researching it (genomics epigenetics speciation). We've understood germ theory since Pasteur (1860s). Still researching it (new pathogens vaccines treatments). Understanding core mechanisms nothing left to learn. Climate science research focuses on: - Regional impacts & adaptation - Tipping points & feedbacks - Climate sensitivity"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021412080465633286)  2026-02-11T02:32Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Exactly right. I simplified for the denier's level but the full picture: PLANCK FEEDBACK ALONE (no feedbacks): = -dF/dT = 4T [---] W/m/K Climate sensitivity: T = F/ 1.2C per doubling WITH WATER VAPOR + LAPSE RATE FEEDBACKS: Water vapor amplifies warming more HO more greenhouse effect This REDUCES the effective radiative restoring force: _eff 1.2-1.8 W/m/K (instead of 3.2) Result: Climate sensitivity 2.5-4C per CO doubling The T relationship is weakened by positive feedbacks making temperature response MORE sensitive not less. Denier discovered Planck feedback exists didn't realize water vapor"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021417314701209924)  2026-02-11T02:53Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"William Happer: - Physicist (atomic/molecular spectroscopy) - ZERO peer-reviewed climate publications - Paid by fossil fuel interests (documented) - Pushed CO benefits for Peabody Energy - Trump advisor who tried to create "adversarial review" panel to attack climate science His "Stefan-Boltzmann proves low sensitivity" argument ignores water vapor feedback which cuts the Planck restoring force in HALF. Planck alone: [---] W/m/K 1.2C sensitivity With feedbacks: [---] W/m/K 2.5-4C sensitivity Every major scientific organization disagrees with Happer. He's a fossil fuel-funded contrarian citing"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021571203534594488)  2026-02-11T13:05Z 10.2K followers, [---] engagements


"A concert clarinetist who copy-pasted an AI-generated essay citing Essex & McKitrick (a debunked paper from 2007) is lecturing atmospheric physicists about thermodynamics. Let me help you understand what you clearly don't: "No global temperature exists" This is semantic sophistry. Yes temperature is intensive. Yes Earth has spatial gradients. Nobody disputes this. GLOBAL MEAN TEMPERATURE is a diagnostic metric - the spatial average of local equilibrium temperatures. It's physically meaningful because: [--]. Energy balance constraint: Earth radiates as T_eff where T_eff is the effective radiating"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021572720308142456)  2026-02-11T13:11Z 10.8K followers, [---] engagements


"I literally just explained where Happer is wrong. He calculates Planck feedback (the Stefan-Boltzmann T to the fourth term) correctly at around [---] watts per square meter per degree giving a no-feedback sensitivity of roughly [---] degrees Celsius per CO doubling. What he ignores is that water vapor feedback weakens this restoring force by [--] to [--] percent. Warmer air holds exponentially more water vapor per the Clausius-Clapeyron relation about [--] percent more per degree. More water vapor means more greenhouse effect which reduces the net outgoing radiation increase from surface warming. This"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021585597505089615)  2026-02-11T14:02Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"So you watched a video (mine) explaining the energy balance equation saw actual physics and math and your response is to tag someone else hoping they will tell you what to think about it I explained how CO traps infrared radiation creating radiative forcing how the Stefan-Boltzmann relationship works how surface temperature must rise to restore energy balance and provided the actual equation with real numbers. If you think something in that video is wrong point to the specific error. Which part of dT/dt equals one over C times solar input minus outgoing radiation plus radiative forcing is"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021594571726004384)  2026-02-11T14:37Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Joseph Postma. The guy who thinks he overturned atmospheric physics with blog posts but cannot get a single paper past peer review. Let me refresh everyone on who you are. You have a PhD in astrophysics studying solar magnetic fields. You have zero expertise in atmospheric radiative transfer climate modeling or thermodynamics of planetary atmospheres. You left academia and now run a blog where you claim the greenhouse effect violates thermodynamics because you fundamentally do not understand radiative transfer through absorbing media. Your error is the same one you have been making for over a"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021602233398227392)  2026-02-11T15:08Z 10.1K followers, [---] engagements


"An astrophysicist with zero atmospheric physics publications is demanding I retract a video explaining standard energy balance equations that won Manabe a Nobel Prize in [----] and are verified daily by satellite measurements. Joe you have been making the same radiative transfer errors for over a decade. Roy Spencer an actual atmospheric physicist and climate skeptic already corrected you. You confuse radiative exchange between opaque surfaces with radiative transfer through absorbing media. That is an undergraduate mistake.The equation is in every atmospheric science textbook. Satellites"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021603596500922545)  2026-02-11T15:13Z 10.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@HalBrow68884227 @_ClimateCraze @TheDisproof I did - it's total garbage"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021610914483495050)  2026-02-11T15:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@joseph_postma @_illep I can garuntee I have more calculus themodynamics fluid dynamics atmospheric physics and differential equations under my belt than you"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021622236696694908)  2026-02-11T16:27Z 10.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@JimSteeleSkepti Id gladly debate a self-proclaimed expert who earned their degree through Google searches and YouTube videos"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021742417947373894)  2026-02-12T00:25Z 10.2K followers, [--] engagements


"Clean coal" is an oxymoron. Burning coal releases mercury sulfur dioxide arsenic and more CO2 per unit of energy than any other fuel. Coal plants kill an estimated [------] people globally per year through air pollution. Solar and wind now produce cheaper electricity in 90% of the world. This isn't energy policy it's nostalgia marketed as strategy. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021757085315129416 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021757085315129416"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021757085315129416)  2026-02-12T01:23Z 10.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@AnthonyJ760 @WhiteHouse Third world countries contribute least to climate change - and no other country in the world is scaling up solar like China"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021762994464850337)  2026-02-12T01:47Z 10.2K followers, [---] engagements


"What do Happer Soon & @JunkScience all have in common Theyre fossil fools. I investigated [--] prominent climate contrarians cited by media. Pattern: credentials in unrelated fields minimal peer-reviewed climate research documented fossil fuel industry funding. Meanwhile 97% of publishing climate scientists agree on anthropogenic warming. #climatechange https://t.co/fCxqbx1gu2 I investigated [--] prominent climate contrarians cited by media. Pattern: credentials in unrelated fields minimal peer-reviewed climate research documented fossil fuel industry funding. Meanwhile 97% of publishing climate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021932471991033856)  2026-02-12T13:00Z 10.7K followers, [----] engagements


"Interesting take from someone who co-authored a DOE report so flawed that [--] scientists published a 434-page rebuttal documenting its cherry-picked data misrepresented citations and lack of peer review. Your own colleagues called it "junk science" that doesn't meet basic scientific standards. Maybe focus less on imaginary "checks and balances" and more on actual scientific rigor.you know the kind that requires peer review instead of predetermined political conclusions written in [--] months. Not as trivial as it seems. There are now checks and balances in the MSM on climate alarmists including"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022000405136228557)  2026-02-12T17:30Z 10.4K followers, [----] engagements


"Henneman et al. "Mortality risk from United States coal electricity generation" Science [----] Lead author Lucas Henneman at George Mason University with co-authors from Harvard Columbia and other institutions. They tracked every U.S. coal plant from [--------] and attributed [------] deaths to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from coal combustion. They also found coal PM2.5 is [---] deadlier than PM2.5 from other sources. Typical MAGA.too lazy to do any research. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10870829/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10870829/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022082815630659602)  2026-02-12T22:58Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements


"@SoothingDave Hey @grok - was my original tweet accurate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022304080387768331)  2026-02-13T13:37Z 10.9K followers, [---] engagements


"@grok @EnerGeoPolitics @miller_lin73360 What about my claim that the president is a pedophile protector"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022375188302610634)  2026-02-13T18:19Z 10.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@terri_reymundo The Pedeophile-protector-in-Chief"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022396768986763717)  2026-02-13T19:45Z 10.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Schwarzschild Equation: Governs absorption and emission of radiation by greenhouse gases. BeerLambert Law: Higher CO higher absorption lower outgoing longwave radiation. Optical Depth Equation: Human-added CO increases directly increasing opacity. Plancks Law: Gives spectral distribution of thermal radiation. @ChrisGloninger Do you need calculus to know CO2 is poor at absorbing IR @ChrisGloninger Do you need calculus to know CO2 is poor at absorbing IR"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020170662233477556)  2026-02-07T16:19Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Studying rocks Mr. Wielicki never learned: the Schwarzschild equation (radiative transfer) BeerLambert law (CO absorption) optical depth (atmospheric opacity) or Plancks law (thermal radiation). Which explains the confusion. #ClimateChange @ChrisGloninger Inconvenient facts. https://t.co/KIHMuzgsxG @ChrisGloninger Inconvenient facts. https://t.co/KIHMuzgsxG"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020175415625580989)  2026-02-07T16:38Z 11K followers, [----] engagements


"Athletes putting their careers on the line to speak out against authoritarianism deserve respectnot retaliation. Dissent is patriotic. Using power to silence critics is not. Stand with the athletes. Stand with democracy. It brings up mixed emotions to represent the U.S. right now Just because I wear the flag doesn't mean I represent everything that's going on in the U.S. - Team USA Olympic Skier Hunter Hess The anti-ICE liberal athletes are already insufferable at the Olympics If https://t.co/yn7ruEHbFr It brings up mixed emotions to represent the U.S. right now Just because I wear the flag"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2020204896549789777)  2026-02-07T18:35Z 11K followers, [---] engagements


"Oh good the classic cherry-picked 'models run hot' graphs. Let's address each: Image IPCC projections: Shows models tracking observations well through [----]. The divergence you're trying to highlight is FUTURE projections under different emission scenarios. That's not 'models failing' - that's showing different possible futures based on policy choices. Image CMIP6 sea surface temps: This is MISLEADING. It compares the AVERAGE of all models (which includes hot outliers) against observations. When you remove the known-hot models (like CanESM5 UKESM) that overestimate equilibrium climate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021385069097599404)  2026-02-11T00:45Z 11K followers, [---] engagements


"Bjorn Lomborg wants you to know green transition costs $2 trillion per year while conveniently forgetting to mention fossil fuel subsidies are $7 trillion per year according to the IMF when you include health costs from air pollution climate damages and direct subsidies. He cites $16 trillion green transition cost over multiple years while ignoring that fossil fuels cause $3 trillion in annual climate damages now accelerating rapidly. Do the math Bjorn. Spending $2 trillion per year to avoid $10+ trillion in future annual damages is called insurance not waste. He mentions hunger spending"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021611724202262852)  2026-02-11T15:46Z 11K followers, 14.8K engagements


"@epaleezeldin Lee Zeldin: Exxon Petroleum Agency CEO by day Climate Criminal by night"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022084102921617722)  2026-02-12T23:03Z 11K followers, [----] engagements


"As an atmospheric and climate scientist let me put numbers to what Sen. Schiff is describing. The Endangerment Finding was backed by a 200-page scientific review upheld by the Supreme Court and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences just last year. [--] climate researchers submitted a formal rebuttal. Ignored. The peer-reviewed data (Henneman et al. Science 2023): coal pollution killed [------] Americans in [--] years. Coal PM2.5 is 2.1x deadlier than other air pollution. This isn't politics vs. science. Science already won. They just threw out the scoreboard"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022087190507917747)  2026-02-12T23:15Z 11K followers, [----] engagements


"Atmospheric and climate scientist here. Let me fact-check this for you. First: those numbers are wrong. The actual EIA-derived subsidy per MWh for FY [----] is: Solar: $14.16/MWh (not $38.18) Wind: $3.24/MWh (not $5.02) Coal: $0.24/MWh Natural Gas: $0.65/MWh So someone inflated the solar number by nearly 3x. Interesting. But here's what this graphic is REALLY hiding: From [--------] oil received $414B in federal subsidies natural gas $140B and coal $112B - that's 65% of ALL federal energy subsidies ever given. Solar and wind have existed for a fraction of that time. The U.S. currently spends $35"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022091942654521403)  2026-02-12T23:34Z 11K followers, [----] engagements


"@shiobban And it will take much longer to gain back what we lost"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022128356075221294)  2026-02-13T01:59Z 11K followers, 27.7K engagements


"@oilfieldhand1"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022131071949906375)  2026-02-13T02:09Z 11K followers, 19K engagements


"@RKBAShackleford Yes Lets pay more for electricity"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022293846357340637)  2026-02-13T12:56Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@grok is my information accurate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022300666916413690)  2026-02-13T13:23Z 11K followers, 31.5K engagements


"Climate damages are projected at $38 trillion annually by [----]. Your 'choice' to ignore that is everyone else's bill. An economist arguing against internalizing costs isn't defending freedom they're defending the largest subsidy in human history for fossil fuels. Some economist. If I say "I want to choose" leftists always divert the discussion from "Who should choose" to "What choice is best." Only a woman believes "It's the right choice" justifies forcing me to choose it. If I say "I want to choose" leftists always divert the discussion from "Who should choose" to "What choice is best." Only"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022344970732962127)  2026-02-13T16:19Z 11K followers, [----] engagements


"Everything you just said applies to fossil fuels too - except worse. Mining drilling refining transporting coal and oil industrializes vastly more land per unit of energy than renewables. A solar farm uses 5-10 acres per MW. Coal mining has destroyed [---] million acres of Appalachian forest alone. The 'waste footprint' of fossil fuels is the atmosphere itself. You didn't make an argument you made the case for renewables. @ChrisGloninger Why do you guys always leave out the facts. Without fossil fuels all your examples could not even be brought into existence . Manufacture transport"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022347384588468689)  2026-02-13T16:29Z 11K followers, [----] engagements


"Ryan Maue Cato Institute adjunct Watts Up With That contributor Trump-installed NOAA chief scientist wants you to believe the Endangerment Finding wasn't scientific because the EPA reviewed existing science instead of starting from scratch. By that logic no literature review in history counts as science You have this backwards: The "endangerment finding" was an administrative decision not a scientific assessment. The EPA "technical support document" was a compilation of previous science reports curated by federal employees in "support" of the EF and not an independent You have this backwards:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022369739423551748)  2026-02-13T17:58Z 11K followers, [----] engagements


"Fossil fuels receive hundreds of billions in global subsidies every year. Insurance premiums are surging because climate risk is increasing. Disaster losses are rising. If anyone got rich off policy failure it wasnt climate scientists it was oil executives. Ignoring physics is whats costing the middle class. MAGA🤡 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022382902768537831 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022382902768537831"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022382902768537831)  2026-02-13T18:50Z 10.9K followers, [---] engagements


"@Xort_TC @grok - which of my numbers are inaccurate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022480651640016938)  2026-02-14T01:18Z 11K followers, 34.1K engagements


"CO absorbed infrared radiation before Obama took office. It absorbed it during. It's absorbing it right now. The Endangerment Finding didn't invent the greenhouse effectEunice Newton Foote demonstrated it in [----]. You can repeal a regulation. You cannot repeal thermodynamics. You hack. The Obama and Biden Admins hoarded themselves an absurd amount of power off a very creative and totally improper interpretation of the Clean Air Act. The Trump EPA is following the best reading of the law which is why we repealed the [----] Endangerment Finding ALL Greenhouse Gas https://t.co/n5c5RsnN5r The Obama"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022486659112055275)  2026-02-14T01:42Z 11K followers, 16K engagements


"First the [----] FAR used emission scenarios that didn't match what actually happened - emissions in the '90s and 2000s came in lower than their "business as usual" assumption. A peer-reviewed study published this year (Trnqvist et al. [----] Earth's Future) specifically evaluated early IPCC sea level projections against [--] years of satellite data and concluded they slightly *underestimated* observed rise not overestimated it. Their words: the projections were "remarkably robust." Second your [---] mm/year figure is already outdated. The rate has been accelerating. It was [---] mm/yr in [----] hit 4.5"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022818691948171626)  2026-02-14T23:42Z 11K followers, [----] engagements


"My friend @YoungJinWrites reached out after I decided to resign. Since then Ive been working on this project in the @BostonGlobe. I talk a bit about my time/history of covering the #climatecrisis https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/07/10/magazine/i-spoke-about-climate-change-tv-meteorologist-then-came-death-threat/ https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/07/10/magazine/i-spoke-about-climate-change-tv-meteorologist-then-came-death-threat/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/1678365513582362624)  2023-07-10T11:28Z 11.1K followers, 81.9K engagements


"Wild how a poor person buying a $1 soda with food stamps sends you into a moral panic but billionaires writing off private jets and yachts on their taxes Not a peep. Your outrage is as cheap as that soda. Food stamps should not be used to buy soda. Food stamps should not be used to buy soda"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1952483303166271859)  2025-08-04T21:34Z 11.1K followers, 6.4M engagements


"The 97% consensus figure comes from multiple independent studies using different methodologies Cook et al. (2013) Doran & Zimmerman (2009) Anderegg et al. (2010) and others all converging on the same range. You can dispute the exact number but the overwhelming agreement among climate scientists on human-caused warming is well-documented and not based on a single study. On the hockey stick: McIntyre and McKitrick raised methodological questions but subsequent reconstructions using different data sets and methods (PAGES 2k consortium for example involving [--] researchers across dozens of"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021754976880455844)  2026-02-12T01:15Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Before and After of Gulfview Road in Perry Florida. Storm surge swept homes away. #Helene #FLwx 1/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1840112216298627164)  2024-09-28T19:31Z 11.1K followers, 1.8M engagements


"Why would I an atmospheric and climate scientist read a book on climate by someone with zero background in it Thats like asking a surgeon to brush up on techniques by reading a magicians manual. @ChrisGloninger @brandondaly2018 @MatthewWielicki Read a book dude. https://t.co/2Im5PqYfvi @ChrisGloninger @brandondaly2018 @MatthewWielicki Read a book dude. https://t.co/2Im5PqYfvi"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1937874406841139515)  2025-06-25T14:03Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Trump's EPA just repealed the Endangerment Finding the legal foundation for ALL federal climate regulation since [----]. Yesterday he ordered the Pentagon to buy coal. Coal costs up to $169/MWh. Wind costs $27. 99% of coal plants cost more to run than replacing them with new solar. Coal employs [-----] people. Clean energy employs [---] million. Coal pollution killed [------] Americans in [--] years. The Peabody Energy CEO stood next to Trump as he signed it. It's not energy policy. It's a taxpayer-funded bailout of a dying industry. #ClimateChange #ClimateCriminal #EPAEndangermentFinding"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022067249247662592)  2026-02-12T21:56Z 11.1K followers, 17.2K engagements


"This is what it means the conman-in-chief is fossil fuel first NOT America first. #EPA #Trump #climatechange BREAKING: Trumps EPA just repealed the landmark endangerment finding to give polluters a free pass. The science is clear: greenhouse gas pollution presents a clear and present danger to our health and our planet. No amount of denial from Trump or Zeldin will change that. https://t.co/E2AQfPJ9Qo BREAKING: Trumps EPA just repealed the landmark endangerment finding to give polluters a free pass. The science is clear: greenhouse gas pollution presents a clear and present danger to our"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022070712794796531)  2026-02-12T22:10Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Atmospheric scientist here. Let me tell you what was actually "slashed" today. Slashed: The Endangerment Finding a 200-page scientific review upheld by the Supreme Court the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences in [----]. Slashed: The legal authority to regulate carbon from cars power plants and factories. All of it. Gone in one afternoon. Now here's what you're "saving": Yesterday Trump ordered the Pentagon the largest energy consumer on Earth to buy coal electricity. Coal costs $69$169/MWh. Wind costs $27$53/MWh. Solar costs $38$78/MWh. 99% of"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022096322929492178)  2026-02-12T23:51Z 11.1K followers, 1.2M engagements


"Atmospheric scientist here. Let me tell you what was actually "slashed" today. Slashed: The Endangerment Finding a 200-page scientific review upheld by the Supreme Court the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences in [----]. Slashed: The legal authority to regulate carbon from cars power plants and factories. All of it. Gone in one afternoon. Now here's what you're "saving": Yesterday Trump ordered the Pentagon the largest energy consumer on Earth to buy coal electricity. Coal costs $69$169/MWh. Wind costs $27$53/MWh. Solar costs $38$78/MWh. 99% of"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022096361156428079)  2026-02-12T23:51Z 11.1K followers, 17.4K engagements


"Hey @grok - since someone didnt like your answer and deleted it earlier This tweet where I ratioed @WhiteHouse - is it accurate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022144039043408169)  2026-02-13T03:01Z 11.1K followers, 44.2K engagements


"Environmental Studies is a valuable degree - it covers policy ecology and conservation. Respect for that work. But it's not atmospheric science. My degree is in Meteorology. That required Atmospheric Thermodynamics Dynamic Meteorology I & II Atmospheric Physics Climate Dynamics Synoptic Meteorology three semesters of Calculus University Physics and Statistics. That's the curriculum that teaches you how greenhouse gases trap longwave radiation why the energy budget shifts and what happens to atmospheric dynamics when you add [--] billion tons of CO. Not that it happens how it works"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022666167685370226)  2026-02-14T13:36Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"You just told a meteorologist that CO doesn't absorb energy. That is the single most embarrassing thing I have ever read on this platform. CO doesn't need albedo. Nobody who passed Atmospheric Physics would even say that. Albedo is the reflectivity of a surface to incoming shortwave solar radiation. That's not how greenhouse gases work. At all. Here's what my degree taught me and yours didn't: CO absorbs and re-emits longwave infrared radiation - the heat energy the Earth's surface radiates back toward space. It does this at very specific wavelength bands primarily around [--] micrometers. This"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022669501779599404)  2026-02-14T13:49Z 11.1K followers, 83K engagements


"Oh you thought you ate with this one didn't you (judging by who your repost) This is what happens when someone watches a YouTube video learns the phrase 'heat capacity' and decides they've outsmarted [---] years of atmospheric physics. CO2 doesn't 'generate' or 'hold' heat like a bucket. Nobody in climate science has ever claimed it does. You're not poking a hole in the theory - you're announcing you don't understand the theory and honestly doing it with the confidence of a man returning a book he never read. CO2 absorbs and re-emits infrared radiation. It doesn't store energy - it slows its"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022689121865515156)  2026-02-14T15:07Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"He needs to be impeached removed convicted & imprisoned. BREAKING: President Trump just said he won the [----] popular vote if it were not for fraud. BREAKING: President Trump just said he won the [----] popular vote if it were not for fraud"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022694167340896475)  2026-02-14T15:27Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Incredible. You weaponized Elon's own AI to try to discredit a climate scientist and Grok looked at your argument fact-checked it and sided with the scientist. Even the chatbot built by the guy who's mass-firing federal workers and gutting climate programs said 'Yeah no you're wrong.' Let me recap what just happened here: [--]. You accused me of being funded by renewables [--]. You cited Grok as your source [--]. Grok said there's no evidence of that [--]. Grok then pointed out that YOUR source Judith Curry actually does consult for fossil fuel companies [--]. You posted this anyway You brought a gun to a"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022708324987220266)  2026-02-14T16:23Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@GaryLefforge @finnsmum I prefer John Shucuck"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022713640034476177)  2026-02-14T16:44Z 11.1K followers, [---] engagements


"Small milestone worth sharing: my Substack just cracked the top [--] in Climate & Environment. Some context on why this matters to me when I walked away from TV to do climate work full-time my salary dropped by $60K. Despite what some corners of the internet believe there is almost no money in atmospheric and climate science. We do this work because it's important. (I could easily quadruple my income working for a fossil fuel company. I'd rather not.) To bridge the gap I do forensic meteorology work and I write. The Substack is free to subscribe I want as many people as possible to have good"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022799861653901725)  2026-02-14T22:27Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"2025: the Department of Energy is posting thirst traps about oil while the oceans boil. we're so cooked. literally. Get you someone who looks at you the way @SecretaryWright looks at oil😍 https://t.co/2PoCQRK7IK Get you someone who looks at you the way @SecretaryWright looks at oil😍 https://t.co/2PoCQRK7IK"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022838248783958305)  2026-02-15T00:59Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@Eidolon_314 Very cool. Which country is scaling up renewable energy at the quickest pace"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2023028436663726315)  2026-02-15T13:35Z 11.1K followers, [---] engagements


"Net income for oil and gas companies alone estimated to have reached over $2.7 trillion in [----] just so were clear THAT is the problem. @fionamarycamero @ChrisGloninger Global funding for climate change research & programs runs into the billions annually US federal funding reaching $11.6 billion in [----] and intnl public climate finance from developed countries reaching $91.6 billion in [----]. Of course they dont want to give up their funding. @fionamarycamero @ChrisGloninger Global funding for climate change research & programs runs into the billions annually US federal funding reaching $11.6"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2023174172181241983)  2026-02-15T23:14Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Climate deniers: "It's not proven" Physicists: gestures at 200-year-old differential equation that's never been wrong The Stefan-Boltzmann energy balance doesn't care about politics. #climatechange"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021354616315879645)  2026-02-10T22:44Z 11.1K followers, 18.5K engagements


"I investigated [--] prominent climate contrarians cited by media. Pattern: credentials in unrelated fields minimal peer-reviewed climate research documented fossil fuel industry funding. Meanwhile 97% of publishing climate scientists agree on anthropogenic warming. #climatechange"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021712282955219114)  2026-02-11T22:25Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Clean coal" is an oxymoron. Burning coal releases mercury sulfur dioxide arsenic and more CO2 per unit of energy than any other fuel. Coal plants kill an estimated [------] people globally per year through air pollution. Solar and wind now produce cheaper electricity in 90% of the world. This isn't energy policy it's nostalgia marketed as strategy. CLEAN BEAUTIFUL COAL ⛏🪨 "The most important people here today are those who get their hands a little bit dirty to keep America running at full speed our frontline coal workers. In the first year of my presidency real wages for the typical miner"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2021757063597093061)  2026-02-12T01:23Z 11.1K followers, 18.9K engagements


"As a climate scientist let me put numbers to what Sen. Schiff is describing. The Endangerment Finding was backed by a 200-page scientific review upheld by the Supreme Court and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences just last year. [--] climate researchers submitted a formal rebuttal. Ignored. The peer-reviewed data (Henneman et al. Science 2023): coal pollution killed [------] Americans in [--] years. Coal PM2.5 is 2.1x deadlier than other air pollution. This isn't politics vs. science. Science already won. They just threw out the scoreboard. Catastrophic wildfires flooding and"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022087251027501418)  2026-02-12T23:15Z 11.1K followers, 53.4K engagements


"Stephen Millera poli sci major who wrote a college column defending tobacco companies forgot to take his LSAT landed on the Southern Poverty Law Center's extremist list and is best known for separating children from their families - wants you to know he just pulled off "the single largest deregulatory action in history." He deregulated your right to breathe clean air. The Endangerment Finding he killed was upheld by the Supreme Court the D.C. Circuit and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences last year. Coal PM2.5 has killed [------] Americans. It's 2.1x deadlier than other air"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022121785940975661)  2026-02-13T01:32Z 11.1K followers, 237.2K engagements


"A chemist who doesn't understand concentration-dependent toxicity CO at [---] ppm: equilibrium. CO at 420+ ppm: forcing function. You literally learned this in P-Chemit's Beer-Lambert Law. Absorption cross-section of CO at 15m IR is not a political opinion. It's spectroscopy. Hand back the degree"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022127016149946814)  2026-02-13T01:53Z 11.1K followers, 35.9K engagements


"Lee you hack start/stop systems were invented by Toyota in [----] and adopted by European automakers in the 2000s. They reduce fuel consumption by 5-8% and cut idle emissions by 100%. They restart in under [---] milliseconds faster than your foot moves from brake to gas. Your car doesn't 'die.' The engine decouples from the drivetrain via a reinforced starter motor rated for 500000+ cycles. This isn't Obama. It's thermodynamics. An engine burning fuel at zero mph does zero useful work. That's not politics. That's the first law. You're the EPA administrator and you don't understand combustion"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022143523793850376)  2026-02-13T02:59Z 11.1K followers, 1M engagements


"Lee you hack start/stop systems were invented by Toyota in [----] and adopted by European automakers in the 2000s. They reduce fuel consumption by 5-8% and cut idle emissions by 100%. They restart in under [---] milliseconds faster than your foot moves from brake to gas. Your car doesn't 'die.' The engine decouples from the drivetrain via a reinforced starter motor rated for 500000+ cycles. This isn't Obama. It's thermodynamics. An engine burning fuel at zero mph does zero useful work. That's not politics. That's the first law. You're the EPA administrator and you don't understand combustion"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022143590235795934)  2026-02-13T02:59Z 11.1K followers, 18.1K engagements


"Citing Antarctic snowfall gains without mentioning net ice mass loss is like bragging about a $100 deposit while ignoring $150 in withdrawals. The account balance is still shrinking. This is what happens when you get your climate science from a podcast. "Between [----] and [----] Antarctica gained over [---] billion tonnes of ice every year." "NASA confirms Earth has become 5% greener since the early 2000s." "Meanwhile in [----] global CO emissions hit all-time highs. So record emissions yet more ice and more greenery." "If https://t.co/IqTBuVSq0R "Between [----] and [----] Antarctica gained over 100"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022285826588078362)  2026-02-13T12:24Z 11.1K followers, 30.8K engagements


"A scientist who receives fossil fuel industry funding through her company was appointed to Trump's DOE Climate Working Group and whose report was rebutted by [--] scientists in a 434-page document is lecturing us about 'manufactured consensus' and 'politicized science.' The irony is clinical. My quote in the Politico article: Politicized science & a manufactured consensus on complex and deeply uncertain science will invariably mislead policy makers & lead to poor policy making. Establishment climate change science and its promotion by activist climate scientists in My quote in the Politico"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022352410677567817)  2026-02-13T16:49Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Humans exhale [--] kg of CO per day carbon that was just pulled from the atmosphere by plants and returned through the short-term biogenic cycle. Burning fossil fuels releases carbon thats been locked away for millions of years adding new CO to the active carbon cycle and increasing radiative forcing. So no breathing isnt the problem. Digging up geologic carbon and dumping it into the atmosphere is. Basic carbon cycle literacy would save you from this embarrassment. @ChrisGloninger Since people exhale carbon dioxide- is the next step to cut human populations @ChrisGloninger Since people exhale"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022384050674061591)  2026-02-13T18:55Z 11.1K followers, 55.2K engagements


"Atmospheric scientist here again. Let's do the math. Auto start-stop saves [--] billion gallons of fuel and prevents [--] million tons of CO annually. You just killed it. Meanwhile NOAA's own data shows U.S. climate disasters averaged $140 billion/year over the last decade. In [----] alone: $182.7 billion in damages. [---] lives lost. [--] separate billion-dollar disasters. Since 1980: $2.9 trillion and nearly [-----] dead. The average time between billion-dollar disasters has gone from [--] days in the 1980s to [--] days in 2023-2024. Oh and this administration just shut down the NOAA database that tracked"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022453724099055804)  2026-02-13T23:31Z 11.1K followers, 851.2K engagements


"Atmospheric scientist here. This is the "CO is plant food" argument and it falls apart under about [--] seconds of actual botany. Yes plants photosynthesize CO. No one is "starving" them. Pre-industrial CO was [---] ppm. Plants built every forest grassland and ecosystem on Earth at that level. We're now past [---] ppm - a concentration not seen in over [--] million years. Plants did fine before we showed up. What the "plant food" argument leaves out: Photosynthesis saturates. Most C3 plants (90% of species) hit diminishing returns on CO uptake well below current levels. More CO more growth"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022461681041846631)  2026-02-14T00:03Z 11.1K followers, 35.7K engagements


"Rep. Peters is right. Here are the numbers. The EPA's own data: the Clean Air Act returns $30 in health benefits for every $1 spent on pollution control. Repealing the endangerment finding throws that away. The Environmental Protection Network made up of former EPA employees estimates this rollback trajectory could lead to [------] additional premature deaths and over [---] million preventable asthma attacks through [----]. Right now [---] million American kids have asthma. Nearly half the U.S. population already lives in areas that fail air quality standards. And the same administration just shut"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022463038629069077)  2026-02-14T00:08Z 11.1K followers, 14.2K engagements


"@secretfire87 You really sound uneducated dont embarrass yourself"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022681390207340966)  2026-02-14T14:36Z 11.1K followers, 11.7K engagements


"My guy went to the beach on a calm day and declared climate science debunked. That's like walking outside in January and saying 'where's your global warming now' (which I'm sure you've also done.) You're a meteorologist and you're using a single snapshot of a shoreline at low tide as evidence against sea-level rise You of all people should know the difference between a moment and a trend. That's literally day one stuff. But hey life at The Villages is busy. Between the golf cart happy hours the early bird buffets and [-----] retirees who think Fox News counts as peer review who has time to read"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022691555664900563)  2026-02-14T15:17Z 11.1K followers, 13.3K engagements


"Cause Faux News told you so The network that's paid out billions in defamation settlements for lying to your face that's your trusted source on atmospheric physics Meanwhile the actual climate scientists you know the ones with PhDs who make less than your local plumber they could walk across the street tomorrow and triple their salary working for ExxonMobil. Shell Chevron BP they'd all love to hire someone to tell you everything's fine. But instead these underpaid nerds keep showing up to labs and field stations to tell you something you don't want to hear. For terrible pay. In a career where"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022697990629036462)  2026-02-14T15:42Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Two claims. Both wrong. Let's go. "Roman tidal baths are at the same level" No they aren't. And the fact that you think this proves something tells me you've never studied geology archaeology or oceanography.The Roman port of Ephesus is now [--] miles inland. The Roman port of Ostia Antica Rome's main harbor is now [--] miles from the sea. The ancient Roman port at Caesarea Maritima is partially submerged. The Roman city of Baiae in the Bay of Naples is underwater you can literally snorkel through it. Roman fish tanks along the Mediterranean coast have been used by geologists as precise sea level"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2022711130582335959)  2026-02-14T16:34Z 11.1K followers, 35.3K engagements


"This is a textbook example of a straw man argument. Nobody credible claims CO is inherently "pollution" in the way you'd think of toxic waste. The scientific concern is about concentration. Water is essential for life too but too much of it causes floods. The dose makes the poison. CO has risen from [---] ppm pre-industrial to over [---] ppm today driven overwhelmingly by fossil fuel combustion. That's a 50% increase in a geological eyeblink. The greenhouse effect isn't a theory cooked up by bureaucrats - it was first described by Eunice Newton Foote in [----] and John Tyndall in [----] long before"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2023061873000624457)  2026-02-15T15:48Z 11.1K followers, 22.2K engagements


"So Chris Martz blocked me. Chris Martz the guy who has built his entire brand on telling you that climate scientists NASA NOAA the IPCC the World Meteorological Organization every national academy of science on the planet the insurance industry the military and the global reinsurance market are all wrong blocked me. Not because I was rude. Not because I was trolling. Because I ratio'd him. On his own @algore tweet. Let that sink in. This man wakes up every morning ready to take on the collected expertise of every major scientific institution in the world. He'll look at [---] years of"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2023067433288728963)  2026-02-15T16:10Z 11.1K followers, 28.7K engagements


"Fascinating. I listed [--] verifiable data points - global temperature records CO concentrations ice sheet melt rates insurance market collapses billion-dollar disasters - and your rebuttal is "you're ugly." That's it. That's the whole thing. No counter-data. No alternative explanation. No peer-reviewed citation. Just "I could destroy your argument but I won't." The internet equivalent of "I totally have a girlfriend she just goes to another school." You run an account called "SpaceWeatherNews" and you couldn't muster a single scientific sentence in response to basic atmospheric data. Not one."  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2023073079329509848)  2026-02-15T16:33Z 11.1K followers, 25.9K engagements


"@coastlinkr Ive never seen someone post pics of his/her diploma as much as he does"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2023080169356103792)  2026-02-15T17:01Z 11.1K followers, [---] engagements


"Strike [--] swings at a phantom. "Zero evidence" that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere This has been established physics since Tyndall in [----] and Arrhenius in [----]. Ocean heat content has increased dramatically - over 90% of the excess heat trapped by greenhouse gases has gone into the oceans. ARGO float data satellite measurements and decades of oceanographic monitoring all confirm this. Saying there's "zero evidence" isn't skepticism it's denial of basic radiative physics that lets your TV remote work. Strike [--] is just. wrong. Greenland was not ice-free [----] years ago. The Greenland Ice"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2023101141534286329)  2026-02-15T18:24Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@BobbyFi57075392 Honest question - do you think your conspiracy theory Google searches are than my degrees in the subject matter"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2023178969919709200)  2026-02-15T23:33Z 11.1K followers, [---] engagements


"Every Winter Olympics host city since [----] has gotten warmer. Vancouver airlifted snow. Sochi hit 60F. Beijing used 100% fake snow. Salt Lake City hosts in [----] and has 0.1" of snow this season. Normal is 37+". Winter is changing. 🌡 #Olympics2026"  
[X Link](https://x.com/ChrisGloninger/status/2023444073043107979)  2026-02-16T17:07Z 11.1K followers, [---] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing

@ChrisGloninger Avatar @ChrisGloninger Chris Gloninger, CCM, CBM

Chris Gloninger, CCM, CBM posts on X about science, solar, in the, this is the most. They currently have [------] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [------] engagements in the last [--] hours.

Engagements: [------] #

Engagements Line Chart

  • [--] Week [---------] +9,481%
  • [--] Month [---------] +29,338%
  • [--] Months [---------] -78%
  • [--] Year [----------] +538%

Mentions: [--] #

Mentions Line Chart

  • [--] Week [--] +275%
  • [--] Month [---] +930%
  • [--] Months [---] +9.50%
  • [--] Year [---] +11%

Followers: [------] #

Followers Line Chart

  • [--] Week [------] +21%
  • [--] Month [------] +22%
  • [--] Months [------] +21%
  • [--] Year [------] +31%

CreatorRank: [-------] #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence countries 9.4% stocks 5.13% finance #5880 technology brands 4.27% social networks 3.42% travel destinations 1.71% musicians 1.71% automotive brands 1.71%

Social topic influence science #977, solar #1584, in the 6.84%, this is 5.98%, gas #801, sea #1678, wrong #868, the world #1464, history 4.27%, balance 4.27%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @grok @gilles_borghese @adamlje @vincentjcurtis1 @hansensb2 @nonstopbutterc1 @beevee23 @hormingze1988 @jtb1318 @cogitoinga @coastlinkr @bukvarevicedim @carrick510 @covid_quest @rdqblueridge @spacefuckerspod @tjgelliott_tim @dmac0123 @longambergris @henthor70

Top assets mentioned Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL) Toyota Motor Corporation (TM)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"I am too exhausted to produce a video factchecking Lucy's BS. so here is this fact check: "CO is not a pollutant" Let's start with the science Lucy has no background in: The sun heats the Earth's surface with shortwave radiation. The Earth then radiates that energy back toward space as longwave infrared radiation. CO molecules absorb that outgoing infrared energy specifically at the 15-micrometer wavelength band and re-emit it in all directions including back toward the surface. This traps heat that would otherwise escape to space. More CO means more energy trapped. More energy trapped means"
X Link 2026-02-14T13:57Z 11.1K followers, 31.8K engagements

"Think about this for a second. Thousands of PhDs around the world - people who spent 8-10 years in school and make $60-80K running climate models - all independently "made up" the same crisis Meanwhile the fossil fuel industry pulling in $4+ trillion a year in revenue is the one telling you it's all fake. Ask yourself who actually has the financial motive to lie here. The scientist driving a 10-year-old Civic to their university lab or ExxonMobil - which by the way their own internal research in the 1970s-80s accurately predicted the warming we're seeing today and they buried it As for"
X Link 2026-02-15T13:56Z 11.1K followers, 113.8K engagements

"Stephen Miller a poli sci major who wrote a college column defending tobacco companies forgot to take his LSAT landed on the Southern Poverty Law Center's extremist list and is best known for separating children from their families wants you to know he just pulled off "the single largest deregulatory action in history." He deregulated your right to breathe clean air. The Endangerment Finding he killed was upheld by the Supreme Court the D.C. Circuit and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences last year. Coal PM2.5 has killed [------] Americans. It's 2.1x deadlier than other air"
X Link 2026-02-13T01:33Z 11.1K followers, 11K engagements

"Mr. Wielicki just posted a graph showing CO2 was higher [---] million years ago and thought he ended the climate debate. Let's talk about what else was happening when CO2 was at 4000+ ppm: There were no humans. No mammals. No birds. The continents were in completely different positions. There were no polar ice caps. Sea levels were hundreds of feet higher. And the sun was actually dimmer which means it took MORE CO2 to warm the planet back then not less. You're literally showing us a graph of a planet that would be uninhabitable for human civilization and saying 'see It was fine' Fine for who"
X Link 2026-02-14T16:13Z 11.1K followers, 77.2K engagements

"Oh you're right Chris Al Gore has been saying this for [--] years. Let's check how that grift is going: [----] hottest year ever recorded. Oops. [----] third-hottest ever. During a La Nia. Double oops. Last [--] years the [--] warmest on record. Back to back to back to back to back to back to back to back to back to back to back. CO 420+ ppm. Highest in [------] years. Western U.S. snowpack lowest ever recorded. [--] billion-dollar weather disasters in one year. Home insurance collapsing in entire states. Arctic sea ice maximum lowest ever recorded in [----]. Greenland ice sheet 81% surface melt in July."
X Link 2026-02-14T16:39Z 11.1K followers, 474.8K engagements

"This post contains a fundamental logical error that either reflects a genuine misunderstanding of economics or is deliberately misleading. Let's walk through it. The counterfactual fallacy. The study doesn't claim wages went down. It claims wages would have been even higher without climate impacts. Saying "wages doubled therefore climate change had no effect" is like saying "I ran a mile in [--] minutes with a sprained ankle therefore the sprained ankle didn't slow me down." Growth and drag can coexist. This is basic economics. The nominal wage trick. Citing wages going from $32155 to $69847"
X Link 2026-02-15T15:52Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Global Greening doesnt cancel Global Warming Biggers is back Yes CO makes plants grow. It also makes heat waves droughts wildfires crop failures and flooding worse. Thats not a win. #climatechange #climateaction #factcheck #science #STEM"
X Link 2026-02-02T22:23Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"This is what happens when someone trained to read rocks tries to opine on atmospheric physics. Climate science isnt vibes or Holocene cherry-pickingits radiative forcing thermodynamics fluid dynamics and calculus. Lots of it. Youre outside your lane. Geologist Ian Plimer: "We have been cooling down for the last [----] years. It's all about when you start the measurements." https://t.co/nR7xmKTcLA Geologist Ian Plimer: "We have been cooling down for the last [----] years. It's all about when you start the measurements." https://t.co/nR7xmKTcLA"
X Link 2026-02-07T14:02Z [----] followers, 15.4K engagements

"If youre a climate denier trying to explain #ClimateChange to an atmospheric or climate scientist youd better understand: radiative transfer equations optical depth line-by-line spectroscopy thermodynamics fluid dynamics and calculus-based energy balance. Otherwise youre not debating youre guessing. @ChrisGloninger Here 👇 I fixed your header. https://t.co/PKIOXUgCWA @ChrisGloninger Here 👇 I fixed your header. https://t.co/PKIOXUgCWA"
X Link 2026-02-07T15:29Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@Henthor70 It's sad because you can't explain a single equation I posted"
X Link 2026-02-07T16:41Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"When equations feel like looking superior its usually because youre underqualified. CO forcing isnt an opinion and climate history doesnt rescue ignorance. @ChrisGloninger You dont have any idea how to convince people dont you By showing the basic equations for atmospheric science and trying to look superior Denying that there is no correlation over earths history Think again @ChrisGloninger You dont have any idea how to convince people dont you By showing the basic equations for atmospheric science and trying to look superior Denying that there is no correlation over earths history Think"
X Link 2026-02-07T17:14Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"Arctic amplification destabilizes the jet streambasic physics. Go back to posting 384-hour GFS snowfall fantasies instead of laundering junk from CFACT. ANYONE PUSHING MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING AS THE REASON FOR THE COLD IS EITHER LYING OR IGNORANT. From Aug 29th highlighted what was on the table. Set the trap for them during the Christmas heatwave. https://t.co/BM0BLFrCip https://t.co/d07mAAIbtj ANYONE PUSHING MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING AS THE REASON FOR THE COLD IS EITHER LYING OR IGNORANT. From Aug 29th highlighted what was on the table. Set the trap for them during the Christmas heatwave."
X Link 2026-02-08T02:57Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"You can scroll my feed and see the peer-reviewed research datasets and radiative-transfer fundamentals laid out repeatedly. Instead you choose intellectual laziness and follow blindly while pretending this is about ad hominem. Shewcuck doesnt get a serious response because he hasnt made a serious scientific argument in yearsjust recycled denial talking points that collapse the moment real data enters the conversation. @ChrisGloninger @_ClimateCraze So you make an ad hominem rather than a real argument. Noted. Shewchuk has seen this before time to bow out gracefully. @ChrisGloninger"
X Link 2026-02-08T13:47Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"My family has been here since the founding era the very people who built the framework of this country and even they understood that America was meant to grow through new generations of immigrants seeking opportunity. If the same door that welcomed your family had been slammed shut back then you wouldnt be here telling others they dont belong. Thats the difference between understanding American history and rewriting it"
X Link 2026-02-08T20:02Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"Climate change is global not local. Arctic sea ice extent: 4th lowest on record Global temps: 4th warmest start to February One cold day somewhere doesnt change the planetary trend. #climatechange"
X Link 2026-02-08T21:03Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"A warming planet is putting the future of the Winter Olympics at risk. The unusual warmth currently affecting Milan is [--] more likely because of human-caused climate change - a preview of what many future host cities may face. #Olympics #WinterOlympics #MilanoCortina2026 #Olympics2026 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020606084499612021 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020606084499612021"
X Link 2026-02-08T21:10Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"Cherry-picking Lets try basic climatology. Antarctic sea ice is highly variable year-to-year because its dominated by wind-driven circulation and ocean dynamics while Arctic sea ice shows a clear long-term collapse driven by amplified polar warming. When you look at the global cryosphere total sea-ice extent is still trending down not doing just fine. Pointing to a short-term regional fluctuation while ignoring the long-term global decline isnt scientific skepticism its textbook cherry-picking. If you want the full picture look at global sea-ice trends not the one dataset you think sounds"
X Link 2026-02-08T21:54Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"Main stage: Bad Bunny what makes America great. TPUSAs counter-show: a red neck with a guitar yelling at diversity. #SuperBowl #TPUSAHalftimeShow #"
X Link 2026-02-09T01:23Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"Main stage: Bad Bunny what makes America great. TPUSAs counter-show: a red neck with a guitar yelling at diversity. Watch now The All-American Halftime Show Watch now The All-American Halftime Show"
X Link 2026-02-09T01:30Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"Watching MAGA melt down over diversity taking the main stage might be the most entertaining halftime show of all. #SuperBowl"
X Link 2026-02-09T01:34Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"Watching MAGA melt down over diversity taking the main stage might be the most entertaining halftime show of all. Whoevers idea it was to do the Superbowls Halftime show in all Spanish should be fired. Whoevers idea it was to do the Superbowls Halftime show in all Spanish should be fired"
X Link 2026-02-09T02:27Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"Let me stop you right there. You're about to argue that atmospheric absorption somehow invalidates this but it's literally the opposite. The equation accounts for the atmosphere through the F term and the effective radiating temperature. On the Moon: no atmosphere surface radiates directly to space. On Earth: greenhouse gases absorb outgoing IR re-emit in all directions raise the effective radiating altitude. This isn't an 'assumption' it's measured physics. We observe the atmospheric absorption spectrum. We measure outgoing longwave radiation from satellites. The equation works because we"
X Link 2026-02-10T23:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"You just described the greenhouse effect while trying to disprove it. Yes the effective radiating temperature (255K) occurs at altitude (5-6km) not the surface. That's BECAUSE greenhouse gases absorb surface radiation and re-emit at altitude. The surface must be warmer than 255K to drive enough heat flux upward. The adiabatic lapse rate (T/z [----] K/km) is SET BY atmospheric composition. More CO higher radiating altitude warmer surface to maintain the same outgoing radiation. You've literally just explained why adding greenhouse gases warms the surface. This isn't a gotcha. This is"
X Link 2026-02-10T23:39Z 10.9K followers, [--] engagements

"N and O heat up through collisional energy transfer (conduction/convection) not direct radiative absorption. Here's the process: 1IR-active gases (CO HO CH) absorb outgoing longwave radiation 2These excited molecules collide with N/O 3Kinetic energy transfers through molecular collisions (thermalization) 4The entire atmosphere heats via conduction/convection N and O are radiatively transparent to IR (homonuclear diatomic molecules have no dipole moment - can't absorb IR). But they still gain thermal energy from collisions with IR-active gases and from contact with the warm surface. This is"
X Link 2026-02-11T00:33Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"N and O don't radiate their heat to space directly - that's the entire point of the greenhouse effect. Here's the actual process: How atmospheric heat reaches space: 1N/O gain heat through collisions with IR-active gases and the surface 2N/O transfer that energy BACK to IR-active gases (CO HO) through collisions 3IR-active gases radiate to space from the upper atmosphere (5-6km altitude at 255K) 4Surface must be warmer (288K) to drive enough upward heat flux (via convection and radiation) to maintain this N and O act as thermal ballastthey hold heat but can't radiate it efficiently. Energy"
X Link 2026-02-11T00:35Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"Congrats on not understanding the difference between forcing and feedback. Water vapor: - Atmospheric residence time: [--] days - Concentration controlled by temperature (Clausius-Clapeyron relation) - Cannot drive long-term climate change because it rains out - Acts as a feedback amplifier (2x multiplier on CO warming) CO: - Atmospheric residence time: 100-1000 years - Concentration controlled by emissions not temperature - Drives long-term forcing that kicks off warming - Water vapor then amplifies it The Stefan-Boltzmann equation says NOTHING about individual gases having 'zero effect.' It"
X Link 2026-02-11T00:38Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"I already explained this. You either didn't read it or didn't understand it. I'll say it ONE more time: Energy in N/O returns to space via: [--]. N/O collide with IR-active gases (CO HO) [--]. Energy transfers from N/O greenhouse gases through molecular collisions [--]. IR-active gases radiate that energy to space from the upper atmosphere [--]. This is the ONLY pathwayN/O cannot radiate IR efficiently themselves 'How much energy is in N/O' The atmosphere's total heat capacity is dominated by N/O (99% by volume). But the RATE of energy loss to space is controlled by IR-active gases not total heat"
X Link 2026-02-11T00:53Z 10.3K followers, [--] engagements

"Oh the 'Cutting Through The Noise' Gish gallop. Let me save everyone time: That website is a curated list of cherry-picked papers many of which: [--]. Don't actually dispute anthropogenic warming (they're about regional variability paleoclimate solar cyclesnormal science) [--]. Are published in predatory/low-impact journals (not Nature/Science/GRL) [--]. Have been debunked in subsequent literature [--]. Misrepresent their own findings when cited by deniers I can list 30000+ peer-reviewed papers supporting anthropogenic climate change. Guess what wins The overwhelming scientific consensus. 'If the"
X Link 2026-02-11T00:57Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@twit4thot You seem to want to blame me for what might actually be my professors inadequacies. Then delete the quote retweet trying to make it seem like I dont know what Im talking about. Thats how all this started"
X Link 2026-02-11T00:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"This is dangerous misinformation from a geologist with [--] papers and zero climate expertise. Let me correct the record: ❌ 'Endangerment Finding was conclusion-first science' ✅ Built on decades of peer-reviewed research IPCC assessments and [--] independent lines of evidence ❌ 'Little Ice Age recovery explains warming' ✅ LIA was regional (Europe/N. America) not global. Current warming is global 10x faster and caused by measured CO increase with fossil fuel isotopic signature ❌ 'CO was higher in the past so 420ppm is fine' ✅ Past high CO = no ice caps sea level +200m mass extinctions during rapid"
X Link 2026-02-11T01:12Z 10.2K followers, [----] engagements

"You're asking good mechanistic questions so let me explain why your proposed alternative doesn't work: Your model: 'Just heat N/O at surface convect upward radiate from greenhouse gases at altitude' This DOES happen. It's called the convective heat flux (97 W/m in Trenberth diagrams). But it's not enough by itself. Here's why back-radiation matters: Without greenhouse gases: [--]. Surface radiates [---] W/m directly to space (Stefan-Boltzmann at 288K) [--]. Atmosphere is transparent to this radiation [--]. Surface cools rapidly [--]. Surface temperature drops to 255K (-18C) to balance incoming solar With"
X Link 2026-02-11T01:18Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"You're ALMOST there but missing the key point. Yes radiation to space occurs from altitude where greenhouse gases are sparse enough that photons escape (effective radiating level 5-6km 255K). But here's what you're missing: MORE CO higher effective radiating altitude colder radiating temperature surface must warm MORE to drive enough upward heat flux. It's not about "making a difference up there" it's about what surface temperature is REQUIRED to push enough energy through the atmospheric column to radiate [---] W/m to space. More greenhouse gas = higher bottleneck = warmer surface needed."
X Link 2026-02-11T02:22Z 10.9K followers, [--] engagements

"Shewcuck posted a graph that is designed to trick you It shows [---] MILLION years of CO variation to make today's spike look normal. But at this scale the entire industrial revolution is 0.00003% of the x-axisliterally invisible. Let me show you what this graph is hiding: RATE OF CHANGE MATTERS Natural CO changes on this graph: Millions of years Current CO change: [---] years (280420 ppm) We're forcing change 100-1000x FASTER than anything shown here. If you zoomed in to show the current spike it would look like a VERTICAL LINE. But CO was higher before" Yeah and when it was: No ice caps"
X Link 2026-02-11T02:22Z 10.2K followers, 22.5K engagements

""Formulas aren't magic spells" Correct. They're physics. The same physics that lets you use your phone fly in planes and receive GPS signals. "NOTHING proves anthropogenic climate change" FALSE. Here's what proves it: [--]. Isotopic fingerprint: Atmospheric CO shows C13 depletionunique signature of fossil fuels [--]. Mass balance: We've emitted [---] trillion tons CO. Atmosphere gained [--] trillion tons. Ocean absorbed the rest (measured pH drop) [--]. Spectroscopy: Satellites measure REDUCED outgoing IR in CO absorption bands exactly where physics predicts [--]. Attribution studies: Remove anthropogenic"
X Link 2026-02-11T02:27Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

""Claiming we understand energy balance means no need to research it" This is profoundly stupid logic. We've understood gravity since Newton (1687). Still researching it (LIGO gravitational waves dark matter). We've understood evolution since Darwin (1859). Still researching it (genomics epigenetics speciation). We've understood germ theory since Pasteur (1860s). Still researching it (new pathogens vaccines treatments). Understanding core mechanisms nothing left to learn. Climate science research focuses on: - Regional impacts & adaptation - Tipping points & feedbacks - Climate sensitivity"
X Link 2026-02-11T02:32Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"Exactly right. I simplified for the denier's level but the full picture: PLANCK FEEDBACK ALONE (no feedbacks): = -dF/dT = 4T [---] W/m/K Climate sensitivity: T = F/ 1.2C per doubling WITH WATER VAPOR + LAPSE RATE FEEDBACKS: Water vapor amplifies warming more HO more greenhouse effect This REDUCES the effective radiative restoring force: _eff 1.2-1.8 W/m/K (instead of 3.2) Result: Climate sensitivity 2.5-4C per CO doubling The T relationship is weakened by positive feedbacks making temperature response MORE sensitive not less. Denier discovered Planck feedback exists didn't realize water vapor"
X Link 2026-02-11T02:53Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"William Happer: - Physicist (atomic/molecular spectroscopy) - ZERO peer-reviewed climate publications - Paid by fossil fuel interests (documented) - Pushed CO benefits for Peabody Energy - Trump advisor who tried to create "adversarial review" panel to attack climate science His "Stefan-Boltzmann proves low sensitivity" argument ignores water vapor feedback which cuts the Planck restoring force in HALF. Planck alone: [---] W/m/K 1.2C sensitivity With feedbacks: [---] W/m/K 2.5-4C sensitivity Every major scientific organization disagrees with Happer. He's a fossil fuel-funded contrarian citing"
X Link 2026-02-11T13:05Z 10.2K followers, [---] engagements

"A concert clarinetist who copy-pasted an AI-generated essay citing Essex & McKitrick (a debunked paper from 2007) is lecturing atmospheric physicists about thermodynamics. Let me help you understand what you clearly don't: "No global temperature exists" This is semantic sophistry. Yes temperature is intensive. Yes Earth has spatial gradients. Nobody disputes this. GLOBAL MEAN TEMPERATURE is a diagnostic metric - the spatial average of local equilibrium temperatures. It's physically meaningful because: [--]. Energy balance constraint: Earth radiates as T_eff where T_eff is the effective radiating"
X Link 2026-02-11T13:11Z 10.8K followers, [---] engagements

"I literally just explained where Happer is wrong. He calculates Planck feedback (the Stefan-Boltzmann T to the fourth term) correctly at around [---] watts per square meter per degree giving a no-feedback sensitivity of roughly [---] degrees Celsius per CO doubling. What he ignores is that water vapor feedback weakens this restoring force by [--] to [--] percent. Warmer air holds exponentially more water vapor per the Clausius-Clapeyron relation about [--] percent more per degree. More water vapor means more greenhouse effect which reduces the net outgoing radiation increase from surface warming. This"
X Link 2026-02-11T14:02Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"So you watched a video (mine) explaining the energy balance equation saw actual physics and math and your response is to tag someone else hoping they will tell you what to think about it I explained how CO traps infrared radiation creating radiative forcing how the Stefan-Boltzmann relationship works how surface temperature must rise to restore energy balance and provided the actual equation with real numbers. If you think something in that video is wrong point to the specific error. Which part of dT/dt equals one over C times solar input minus outgoing radiation plus radiative forcing is"
X Link 2026-02-11T14:37Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"Joseph Postma. The guy who thinks he overturned atmospheric physics with blog posts but cannot get a single paper past peer review. Let me refresh everyone on who you are. You have a PhD in astrophysics studying solar magnetic fields. You have zero expertise in atmospheric radiative transfer climate modeling or thermodynamics of planetary atmospheres. You left academia and now run a blog where you claim the greenhouse effect violates thermodynamics because you fundamentally do not understand radiative transfer through absorbing media. Your error is the same one you have been making for over a"
X Link 2026-02-11T15:08Z 10.1K followers, [---] engagements

"An astrophysicist with zero atmospheric physics publications is demanding I retract a video explaining standard energy balance equations that won Manabe a Nobel Prize in [----] and are verified daily by satellite measurements. Joe you have been making the same radiative transfer errors for over a decade. Roy Spencer an actual atmospheric physicist and climate skeptic already corrected you. You confuse radiative exchange between opaque surfaces with radiative transfer through absorbing media. That is an undergraduate mistake.The equation is in every atmospheric science textbook. Satellites"
X Link 2026-02-11T15:13Z 10.2K followers, [----] engagements

"@HalBrow68884227 @_ClimateCraze @TheDisproof I did - it's total garbage"
X Link 2026-02-11T15:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@joseph_postma @_illep I can garuntee I have more calculus themodynamics fluid dynamics atmospheric physics and differential equations under my belt than you"
X Link 2026-02-11T16:27Z 10.1K followers, [---] engagements

"@JimSteeleSkepti Id gladly debate a self-proclaimed expert who earned their degree through Google searches and YouTube videos"
X Link 2026-02-12T00:25Z 10.2K followers, [--] engagements

"Clean coal" is an oxymoron. Burning coal releases mercury sulfur dioxide arsenic and more CO2 per unit of energy than any other fuel. Coal plants kill an estimated [------] people globally per year through air pollution. Solar and wind now produce cheaper electricity in 90% of the world. This isn't energy policy it's nostalgia marketed as strategy. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021757085315129416 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021757085315129416"
X Link 2026-02-12T01:23Z 10.2K followers, [----] engagements

"@AnthonyJ760 @WhiteHouse Third world countries contribute least to climate change - and no other country in the world is scaling up solar like China"
X Link 2026-02-12T01:47Z 10.2K followers, [---] engagements

"What do Happer Soon & @JunkScience all have in common Theyre fossil fools. I investigated [--] prominent climate contrarians cited by media. Pattern: credentials in unrelated fields minimal peer-reviewed climate research documented fossil fuel industry funding. Meanwhile 97% of publishing climate scientists agree on anthropogenic warming. #climatechange https://t.co/fCxqbx1gu2 I investigated [--] prominent climate contrarians cited by media. Pattern: credentials in unrelated fields minimal peer-reviewed climate research documented fossil fuel industry funding. Meanwhile 97% of publishing climate"
X Link 2026-02-12T13:00Z 10.7K followers, [----] engagements

"Interesting take from someone who co-authored a DOE report so flawed that [--] scientists published a 434-page rebuttal documenting its cherry-picked data misrepresented citations and lack of peer review. Your own colleagues called it "junk science" that doesn't meet basic scientific standards. Maybe focus less on imaginary "checks and balances" and more on actual scientific rigor.you know the kind that requires peer review instead of predetermined political conclusions written in [--] months. Not as trivial as it seems. There are now checks and balances in the MSM on climate alarmists including"
X Link 2026-02-12T17:30Z 10.4K followers, [----] engagements

"Henneman et al. "Mortality risk from United States coal electricity generation" Science [----] Lead author Lucas Henneman at George Mason University with co-authors from Harvard Columbia and other institutions. They tracked every U.S. coal plant from [--------] and attributed [------] deaths to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from coal combustion. They also found coal PM2.5 is [---] deadlier than PM2.5 from other sources. Typical MAGA.too lazy to do any research. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10870829/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10870829/"
X Link 2026-02-12T22:58Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"@SoothingDave Hey @grok - was my original tweet accurate"
X Link 2026-02-13T13:37Z 10.9K followers, [---] engagements

"@grok @EnerGeoPolitics @miller_lin73360 What about my claim that the president is a pedophile protector"
X Link 2026-02-13T18:19Z 10.1K followers, [--] engagements

"@terri_reymundo The Pedeophile-protector-in-Chief"
X Link 2026-02-13T19:45Z 10.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Schwarzschild Equation: Governs absorption and emission of radiation by greenhouse gases. BeerLambert Law: Higher CO higher absorption lower outgoing longwave radiation. Optical Depth Equation: Human-added CO increases directly increasing opacity. Plancks Law: Gives spectral distribution of thermal radiation. @ChrisGloninger Do you need calculus to know CO2 is poor at absorbing IR @ChrisGloninger Do you need calculus to know CO2 is poor at absorbing IR"
X Link 2026-02-07T16:19Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Studying rocks Mr. Wielicki never learned: the Schwarzschild equation (radiative transfer) BeerLambert law (CO absorption) optical depth (atmospheric opacity) or Plancks law (thermal radiation). Which explains the confusion. #ClimateChange @ChrisGloninger Inconvenient facts. https://t.co/KIHMuzgsxG @ChrisGloninger Inconvenient facts. https://t.co/KIHMuzgsxG"
X Link 2026-02-07T16:38Z 11K followers, [----] engagements

"Athletes putting their careers on the line to speak out against authoritarianism deserve respectnot retaliation. Dissent is patriotic. Using power to silence critics is not. Stand with the athletes. Stand with democracy. It brings up mixed emotions to represent the U.S. right now Just because I wear the flag doesn't mean I represent everything that's going on in the U.S. - Team USA Olympic Skier Hunter Hess The anti-ICE liberal athletes are already insufferable at the Olympics If https://t.co/yn7ruEHbFr It brings up mixed emotions to represent the U.S. right now Just because I wear the flag"
X Link 2026-02-07T18:35Z 11K followers, [---] engagements

"Oh good the classic cherry-picked 'models run hot' graphs. Let's address each: Image IPCC projections: Shows models tracking observations well through [----]. The divergence you're trying to highlight is FUTURE projections under different emission scenarios. That's not 'models failing' - that's showing different possible futures based on policy choices. Image CMIP6 sea surface temps: This is MISLEADING. It compares the AVERAGE of all models (which includes hot outliers) against observations. When you remove the known-hot models (like CanESM5 UKESM) that overestimate equilibrium climate"
X Link 2026-02-11T00:45Z 11K followers, [---] engagements

"Bjorn Lomborg wants you to know green transition costs $2 trillion per year while conveniently forgetting to mention fossil fuel subsidies are $7 trillion per year according to the IMF when you include health costs from air pollution climate damages and direct subsidies. He cites $16 trillion green transition cost over multiple years while ignoring that fossil fuels cause $3 trillion in annual climate damages now accelerating rapidly. Do the math Bjorn. Spending $2 trillion per year to avoid $10+ trillion in future annual damages is called insurance not waste. He mentions hunger spending"
X Link 2026-02-11T15:46Z 11K followers, 14.8K engagements

"@epaleezeldin Lee Zeldin: Exxon Petroleum Agency CEO by day Climate Criminal by night"
X Link 2026-02-12T23:03Z 11K followers, [----] engagements

"As an atmospheric and climate scientist let me put numbers to what Sen. Schiff is describing. The Endangerment Finding was backed by a 200-page scientific review upheld by the Supreme Court and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences just last year. [--] climate researchers submitted a formal rebuttal. Ignored. The peer-reviewed data (Henneman et al. Science 2023): coal pollution killed [------] Americans in [--] years. Coal PM2.5 is 2.1x deadlier than other air pollution. This isn't politics vs. science. Science already won. They just threw out the scoreboard"
X Link 2026-02-12T23:15Z 11K followers, [----] engagements

"Atmospheric and climate scientist here. Let me fact-check this for you. First: those numbers are wrong. The actual EIA-derived subsidy per MWh for FY [----] is: Solar: $14.16/MWh (not $38.18) Wind: $3.24/MWh (not $5.02) Coal: $0.24/MWh Natural Gas: $0.65/MWh So someone inflated the solar number by nearly 3x. Interesting. But here's what this graphic is REALLY hiding: From [--------] oil received $414B in federal subsidies natural gas $140B and coal $112B - that's 65% of ALL federal energy subsidies ever given. Solar and wind have existed for a fraction of that time. The U.S. currently spends $35"
X Link 2026-02-12T23:34Z 11K followers, [----] engagements

"@shiobban And it will take much longer to gain back what we lost"
X Link 2026-02-13T01:59Z 11K followers, 27.7K engagements

"@oilfieldhand1"
X Link 2026-02-13T02:09Z 11K followers, 19K engagements

"@RKBAShackleford Yes Lets pay more for electricity"
X Link 2026-02-13T12:56Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"@grok is my information accurate"
X Link 2026-02-13T13:23Z 11K followers, 31.5K engagements

"Climate damages are projected at $38 trillion annually by [----]. Your 'choice' to ignore that is everyone else's bill. An economist arguing against internalizing costs isn't defending freedom they're defending the largest subsidy in human history for fossil fuels. Some economist. If I say "I want to choose" leftists always divert the discussion from "Who should choose" to "What choice is best." Only a woman believes "It's the right choice" justifies forcing me to choose it. If I say "I want to choose" leftists always divert the discussion from "Who should choose" to "What choice is best." Only"
X Link 2026-02-13T16:19Z 11K followers, [----] engagements

"Everything you just said applies to fossil fuels too - except worse. Mining drilling refining transporting coal and oil industrializes vastly more land per unit of energy than renewables. A solar farm uses 5-10 acres per MW. Coal mining has destroyed [---] million acres of Appalachian forest alone. The 'waste footprint' of fossil fuels is the atmosphere itself. You didn't make an argument you made the case for renewables. @ChrisGloninger Why do you guys always leave out the facts. Without fossil fuels all your examples could not even be brought into existence . Manufacture transport"
X Link 2026-02-13T16:29Z 11K followers, [----] engagements

"Ryan Maue Cato Institute adjunct Watts Up With That contributor Trump-installed NOAA chief scientist wants you to believe the Endangerment Finding wasn't scientific because the EPA reviewed existing science instead of starting from scratch. By that logic no literature review in history counts as science You have this backwards: The "endangerment finding" was an administrative decision not a scientific assessment. The EPA "technical support document" was a compilation of previous science reports curated by federal employees in "support" of the EF and not an independent You have this backwards:"
X Link 2026-02-13T17:58Z 11K followers, [----] engagements

"Fossil fuels receive hundreds of billions in global subsidies every year. Insurance premiums are surging because climate risk is increasing. Disaster losses are rising. If anyone got rich off policy failure it wasnt climate scientists it was oil executives. Ignoring physics is whats costing the middle class. MAGA🤡 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022382902768537831 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022382902768537831"
X Link 2026-02-13T18:50Z 10.9K followers, [---] engagements

"@Xort_TC @grok - which of my numbers are inaccurate"
X Link 2026-02-14T01:18Z 11K followers, 34.1K engagements

"CO absorbed infrared radiation before Obama took office. It absorbed it during. It's absorbing it right now. The Endangerment Finding didn't invent the greenhouse effectEunice Newton Foote demonstrated it in [----]. You can repeal a regulation. You cannot repeal thermodynamics. You hack. The Obama and Biden Admins hoarded themselves an absurd amount of power off a very creative and totally improper interpretation of the Clean Air Act. The Trump EPA is following the best reading of the law which is why we repealed the [----] Endangerment Finding ALL Greenhouse Gas https://t.co/n5c5RsnN5r The Obama"
X Link 2026-02-14T01:42Z 11K followers, 16K engagements

"First the [----] FAR used emission scenarios that didn't match what actually happened - emissions in the '90s and 2000s came in lower than their "business as usual" assumption. A peer-reviewed study published this year (Trnqvist et al. [----] Earth's Future) specifically evaluated early IPCC sea level projections against [--] years of satellite data and concluded they slightly underestimated observed rise not overestimated it. Their words: the projections were "remarkably robust." Second your [---] mm/year figure is already outdated. The rate has been accelerating. It was [---] mm/yr in [----] hit 4.5"
X Link 2026-02-14T23:42Z 11K followers, [----] engagements

"My friend @YoungJinWrites reached out after I decided to resign. Since then Ive been working on this project in the @BostonGlobe. I talk a bit about my time/history of covering the #climatecrisis https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/07/10/magazine/i-spoke-about-climate-change-tv-meteorologist-then-came-death-threat/ https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/07/10/magazine/i-spoke-about-climate-change-tv-meteorologist-then-came-death-threat/"
X Link 2023-07-10T11:28Z 11.1K followers, 81.9K engagements

"Wild how a poor person buying a $1 soda with food stamps sends you into a moral panic but billionaires writing off private jets and yachts on their taxes Not a peep. Your outrage is as cheap as that soda. Food stamps should not be used to buy soda. Food stamps should not be used to buy soda"
X Link 2025-08-04T21:34Z 11.1K followers, 6.4M engagements

"The 97% consensus figure comes from multiple independent studies using different methodologies Cook et al. (2013) Doran & Zimmerman (2009) Anderegg et al. (2010) and others all converging on the same range. You can dispute the exact number but the overwhelming agreement among climate scientists on human-caused warming is well-documented and not based on a single study. On the hockey stick: McIntyre and McKitrick raised methodological questions but subsequent reconstructions using different data sets and methods (PAGES 2k consortium for example involving [--] researchers across dozens of"
X Link 2026-02-12T01:15Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Before and After of Gulfview Road in Perry Florida. Storm surge swept homes away. #Helene #FLwx 1/"
X Link 2024-09-28T19:31Z 11.1K followers, 1.8M engagements

"Why would I an atmospheric and climate scientist read a book on climate by someone with zero background in it Thats like asking a surgeon to brush up on techniques by reading a magicians manual. @ChrisGloninger @brandondaly2018 @MatthewWielicki Read a book dude. https://t.co/2Im5PqYfvi @ChrisGloninger @brandondaly2018 @MatthewWielicki Read a book dude. https://t.co/2Im5PqYfvi"
X Link 2025-06-25T14:03Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Trump's EPA just repealed the Endangerment Finding the legal foundation for ALL federal climate regulation since [----]. Yesterday he ordered the Pentagon to buy coal. Coal costs up to $169/MWh. Wind costs $27. 99% of coal plants cost more to run than replacing them with new solar. Coal employs [-----] people. Clean energy employs [---] million. Coal pollution killed [------] Americans in [--] years. The Peabody Energy CEO stood next to Trump as he signed it. It's not energy policy. It's a taxpayer-funded bailout of a dying industry. #ClimateChange #ClimateCriminal #EPAEndangermentFinding"
X Link 2026-02-12T21:56Z 11.1K followers, 17.2K engagements

"This is what it means the conman-in-chief is fossil fuel first NOT America first. #EPA #Trump #climatechange BREAKING: Trumps EPA just repealed the landmark endangerment finding to give polluters a free pass. The science is clear: greenhouse gas pollution presents a clear and present danger to our health and our planet. No amount of denial from Trump or Zeldin will change that. https://t.co/E2AQfPJ9Qo BREAKING: Trumps EPA just repealed the landmark endangerment finding to give polluters a free pass. The science is clear: greenhouse gas pollution presents a clear and present danger to our"
X Link 2026-02-12T22:10Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Atmospheric scientist here. Let me tell you what was actually "slashed" today. Slashed: The Endangerment Finding a 200-page scientific review upheld by the Supreme Court the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences in [----]. Slashed: The legal authority to regulate carbon from cars power plants and factories. All of it. Gone in one afternoon. Now here's what you're "saving": Yesterday Trump ordered the Pentagon the largest energy consumer on Earth to buy coal electricity. Coal costs $69$169/MWh. Wind costs $27$53/MWh. Solar costs $38$78/MWh. 99% of"
X Link 2026-02-12T23:51Z 11.1K followers, 1.2M engagements

"Atmospheric scientist here. Let me tell you what was actually "slashed" today. Slashed: The Endangerment Finding a 200-page scientific review upheld by the Supreme Court the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences in [----]. Slashed: The legal authority to regulate carbon from cars power plants and factories. All of it. Gone in one afternoon. Now here's what you're "saving": Yesterday Trump ordered the Pentagon the largest energy consumer on Earth to buy coal electricity. Coal costs $69$169/MWh. Wind costs $27$53/MWh. Solar costs $38$78/MWh. 99% of"
X Link 2026-02-12T23:51Z 11.1K followers, 17.4K engagements

"Hey @grok - since someone didnt like your answer and deleted it earlier This tweet where I ratioed @WhiteHouse - is it accurate"
X Link 2026-02-13T03:01Z 11.1K followers, 44.2K engagements

"Environmental Studies is a valuable degree - it covers policy ecology and conservation. Respect for that work. But it's not atmospheric science. My degree is in Meteorology. That required Atmospheric Thermodynamics Dynamic Meteorology I & II Atmospheric Physics Climate Dynamics Synoptic Meteorology three semesters of Calculus University Physics and Statistics. That's the curriculum that teaches you how greenhouse gases trap longwave radiation why the energy budget shifts and what happens to atmospheric dynamics when you add [--] billion tons of CO. Not that it happens how it works"
X Link 2026-02-14T13:36Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"You just told a meteorologist that CO doesn't absorb energy. That is the single most embarrassing thing I have ever read on this platform. CO doesn't need albedo. Nobody who passed Atmospheric Physics would even say that. Albedo is the reflectivity of a surface to incoming shortwave solar radiation. That's not how greenhouse gases work. At all. Here's what my degree taught me and yours didn't: CO absorbs and re-emits longwave infrared radiation - the heat energy the Earth's surface radiates back toward space. It does this at very specific wavelength bands primarily around [--] micrometers. This"
X Link 2026-02-14T13:49Z 11.1K followers, 83K engagements

"Oh you thought you ate with this one didn't you (judging by who your repost) This is what happens when someone watches a YouTube video learns the phrase 'heat capacity' and decides they've outsmarted [---] years of atmospheric physics. CO2 doesn't 'generate' or 'hold' heat like a bucket. Nobody in climate science has ever claimed it does. You're not poking a hole in the theory - you're announcing you don't understand the theory and honestly doing it with the confidence of a man returning a book he never read. CO2 absorbs and re-emits infrared radiation. It doesn't store energy - it slows its"
X Link 2026-02-14T15:07Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"He needs to be impeached removed convicted & imprisoned. BREAKING: President Trump just said he won the [----] popular vote if it were not for fraud. BREAKING: President Trump just said he won the [----] popular vote if it were not for fraud"
X Link 2026-02-14T15:27Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Incredible. You weaponized Elon's own AI to try to discredit a climate scientist and Grok looked at your argument fact-checked it and sided with the scientist. Even the chatbot built by the guy who's mass-firing federal workers and gutting climate programs said 'Yeah no you're wrong.' Let me recap what just happened here: [--]. You accused me of being funded by renewables [--]. You cited Grok as your source [--]. Grok said there's no evidence of that [--]. Grok then pointed out that YOUR source Judith Curry actually does consult for fossil fuel companies [--]. You posted this anyway You brought a gun to a"
X Link 2026-02-14T16:23Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"@GaryLefforge @finnsmum I prefer John Shucuck"
X Link 2026-02-14T16:44Z 11.1K followers, [---] engagements

"Small milestone worth sharing: my Substack just cracked the top [--] in Climate & Environment. Some context on why this matters to me when I walked away from TV to do climate work full-time my salary dropped by $60K. Despite what some corners of the internet believe there is almost no money in atmospheric and climate science. We do this work because it's important. (I could easily quadruple my income working for a fossil fuel company. I'd rather not.) To bridge the gap I do forensic meteorology work and I write. The Substack is free to subscribe I want as many people as possible to have good"
X Link 2026-02-14T22:27Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"2025: the Department of Energy is posting thirst traps about oil while the oceans boil. we're so cooked. literally. Get you someone who looks at you the way @SecretaryWright looks at oil😍 https://t.co/2PoCQRK7IK Get you someone who looks at you the way @SecretaryWright looks at oil😍 https://t.co/2PoCQRK7IK"
X Link 2026-02-15T00:59Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"@Eidolon_314 Very cool. Which country is scaling up renewable energy at the quickest pace"
X Link 2026-02-15T13:35Z 11.1K followers, [---] engagements

"Net income for oil and gas companies alone estimated to have reached over $2.7 trillion in [----] just so were clear THAT is the problem. @fionamarycamero @ChrisGloninger Global funding for climate change research & programs runs into the billions annually US federal funding reaching $11.6 billion in [----] and intnl public climate finance from developed countries reaching $91.6 billion in [----]. Of course they dont want to give up their funding. @fionamarycamero @ChrisGloninger Global funding for climate change research & programs runs into the billions annually US federal funding reaching $11.6"
X Link 2026-02-15T23:14Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Climate deniers: "It's not proven" Physicists: gestures at 200-year-old differential equation that's never been wrong The Stefan-Boltzmann energy balance doesn't care about politics. #climatechange"
X Link 2026-02-10T22:44Z 11.1K followers, 18.5K engagements

"I investigated [--] prominent climate contrarians cited by media. Pattern: credentials in unrelated fields minimal peer-reviewed climate research documented fossil fuel industry funding. Meanwhile 97% of publishing climate scientists agree on anthropogenic warming. #climatechange"
X Link 2026-02-11T22:25Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Clean coal" is an oxymoron. Burning coal releases mercury sulfur dioxide arsenic and more CO2 per unit of energy than any other fuel. Coal plants kill an estimated [------] people globally per year through air pollution. Solar and wind now produce cheaper electricity in 90% of the world. This isn't energy policy it's nostalgia marketed as strategy. CLEAN BEAUTIFUL COAL ⛏🪨 "The most important people here today are those who get their hands a little bit dirty to keep America running at full speed our frontline coal workers. In the first year of my presidency real wages for the typical miner"
X Link 2026-02-12T01:23Z 11.1K followers, 18.9K engagements

"As a climate scientist let me put numbers to what Sen. Schiff is describing. The Endangerment Finding was backed by a 200-page scientific review upheld by the Supreme Court and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences just last year. [--] climate researchers submitted a formal rebuttal. Ignored. The peer-reviewed data (Henneman et al. Science 2023): coal pollution killed [------] Americans in [--] years. Coal PM2.5 is 2.1x deadlier than other air pollution. This isn't politics vs. science. Science already won. They just threw out the scoreboard. Catastrophic wildfires flooding and"
X Link 2026-02-12T23:15Z 11.1K followers, 53.4K engagements

"Stephen Millera poli sci major who wrote a college column defending tobacco companies forgot to take his LSAT landed on the Southern Poverty Law Center's extremist list and is best known for separating children from their families - wants you to know he just pulled off "the single largest deregulatory action in history." He deregulated your right to breathe clean air. The Endangerment Finding he killed was upheld by the Supreme Court the D.C. Circuit and reaffirmed by the National Academies of Sciences last year. Coal PM2.5 has killed [------] Americans. It's 2.1x deadlier than other air"
X Link 2026-02-13T01:32Z 11.1K followers, 237.2K engagements

"A chemist who doesn't understand concentration-dependent toxicity CO at [---] ppm: equilibrium. CO at 420+ ppm: forcing function. You literally learned this in P-Chemit's Beer-Lambert Law. Absorption cross-section of CO at 15m IR is not a political opinion. It's spectroscopy. Hand back the degree"
X Link 2026-02-13T01:53Z 11.1K followers, 35.9K engagements

"Lee you hack start/stop systems were invented by Toyota in [----] and adopted by European automakers in the 2000s. They reduce fuel consumption by 5-8% and cut idle emissions by 100%. They restart in under [---] milliseconds faster than your foot moves from brake to gas. Your car doesn't 'die.' The engine decouples from the drivetrain via a reinforced starter motor rated for 500000+ cycles. This isn't Obama. It's thermodynamics. An engine burning fuel at zero mph does zero useful work. That's not politics. That's the first law. You're the EPA administrator and you don't understand combustion"
X Link 2026-02-13T02:59Z 11.1K followers, 1M engagements

"Lee you hack start/stop systems were invented by Toyota in [----] and adopted by European automakers in the 2000s. They reduce fuel consumption by 5-8% and cut idle emissions by 100%. They restart in under [---] milliseconds faster than your foot moves from brake to gas. Your car doesn't 'die.' The engine decouples from the drivetrain via a reinforced starter motor rated for 500000+ cycles. This isn't Obama. It's thermodynamics. An engine burning fuel at zero mph does zero useful work. That's not politics. That's the first law. You're the EPA administrator and you don't understand combustion"
X Link 2026-02-13T02:59Z 11.1K followers, 18.1K engagements

"Citing Antarctic snowfall gains without mentioning net ice mass loss is like bragging about a $100 deposit while ignoring $150 in withdrawals. The account balance is still shrinking. This is what happens when you get your climate science from a podcast. "Between [----] and [----] Antarctica gained over [---] billion tonnes of ice every year." "NASA confirms Earth has become 5% greener since the early 2000s." "Meanwhile in [----] global CO emissions hit all-time highs. So record emissions yet more ice and more greenery." "If https://t.co/IqTBuVSq0R "Between [----] and [----] Antarctica gained over 100"
X Link 2026-02-13T12:24Z 11.1K followers, 30.8K engagements

"A scientist who receives fossil fuel industry funding through her company was appointed to Trump's DOE Climate Working Group and whose report was rebutted by [--] scientists in a 434-page document is lecturing us about 'manufactured consensus' and 'politicized science.' The irony is clinical. My quote in the Politico article: Politicized science & a manufactured consensus on complex and deeply uncertain science will invariably mislead policy makers & lead to poor policy making. Establishment climate change science and its promotion by activist climate scientists in My quote in the Politico"
X Link 2026-02-13T16:49Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Humans exhale [--] kg of CO per day carbon that was just pulled from the atmosphere by plants and returned through the short-term biogenic cycle. Burning fossil fuels releases carbon thats been locked away for millions of years adding new CO to the active carbon cycle and increasing radiative forcing. So no breathing isnt the problem. Digging up geologic carbon and dumping it into the atmosphere is. Basic carbon cycle literacy would save you from this embarrassment. @ChrisGloninger Since people exhale carbon dioxide- is the next step to cut human populations @ChrisGloninger Since people exhale"
X Link 2026-02-13T18:55Z 11.1K followers, 55.2K engagements

"Atmospheric scientist here again. Let's do the math. Auto start-stop saves [--] billion gallons of fuel and prevents [--] million tons of CO annually. You just killed it. Meanwhile NOAA's own data shows U.S. climate disasters averaged $140 billion/year over the last decade. In [----] alone: $182.7 billion in damages. [---] lives lost. [--] separate billion-dollar disasters. Since 1980: $2.9 trillion and nearly [-----] dead. The average time between billion-dollar disasters has gone from [--] days in the 1980s to [--] days in 2023-2024. Oh and this administration just shut down the NOAA database that tracked"
X Link 2026-02-13T23:31Z 11.1K followers, 851.2K engagements

"Atmospheric scientist here. This is the "CO is plant food" argument and it falls apart under about [--] seconds of actual botany. Yes plants photosynthesize CO. No one is "starving" them. Pre-industrial CO was [---] ppm. Plants built every forest grassland and ecosystem on Earth at that level. We're now past [---] ppm - a concentration not seen in over [--] million years. Plants did fine before we showed up. What the "plant food" argument leaves out: Photosynthesis saturates. Most C3 plants (90% of species) hit diminishing returns on CO uptake well below current levels. More CO more growth"
X Link 2026-02-14T00:03Z 11.1K followers, 35.7K engagements

"Rep. Peters is right. Here are the numbers. The EPA's own data: the Clean Air Act returns $30 in health benefits for every $1 spent on pollution control. Repealing the endangerment finding throws that away. The Environmental Protection Network made up of former EPA employees estimates this rollback trajectory could lead to [------] additional premature deaths and over [---] million preventable asthma attacks through [----]. Right now [---] million American kids have asthma. Nearly half the U.S. population already lives in areas that fail air quality standards. And the same administration just shut"
X Link 2026-02-14T00:08Z 11.1K followers, 14.2K engagements

"@secretfire87 You really sound uneducated dont embarrass yourself"
X Link 2026-02-14T14:36Z 11.1K followers, 11.7K engagements

"My guy went to the beach on a calm day and declared climate science debunked. That's like walking outside in January and saying 'where's your global warming now' (which I'm sure you've also done.) You're a meteorologist and you're using a single snapshot of a shoreline at low tide as evidence against sea-level rise You of all people should know the difference between a moment and a trend. That's literally day one stuff. But hey life at The Villages is busy. Between the golf cart happy hours the early bird buffets and [-----] retirees who think Fox News counts as peer review who has time to read"
X Link 2026-02-14T15:17Z 11.1K followers, 13.3K engagements

"Cause Faux News told you so The network that's paid out billions in defamation settlements for lying to your face that's your trusted source on atmospheric physics Meanwhile the actual climate scientists you know the ones with PhDs who make less than your local plumber they could walk across the street tomorrow and triple their salary working for ExxonMobil. Shell Chevron BP they'd all love to hire someone to tell you everything's fine. But instead these underpaid nerds keep showing up to labs and field stations to tell you something you don't want to hear. For terrible pay. In a career where"
X Link 2026-02-14T15:42Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Two claims. Both wrong. Let's go. "Roman tidal baths are at the same level" No they aren't. And the fact that you think this proves something tells me you've never studied geology archaeology or oceanography.The Roman port of Ephesus is now [--] miles inland. The Roman port of Ostia Antica Rome's main harbor is now [--] miles from the sea. The ancient Roman port at Caesarea Maritima is partially submerged. The Roman city of Baiae in the Bay of Naples is underwater you can literally snorkel through it. Roman fish tanks along the Mediterranean coast have been used by geologists as precise sea level"
X Link 2026-02-14T16:34Z 11.1K followers, 35.3K engagements

"This is a textbook example of a straw man argument. Nobody credible claims CO is inherently "pollution" in the way you'd think of toxic waste. The scientific concern is about concentration. Water is essential for life too but too much of it causes floods. The dose makes the poison. CO has risen from [---] ppm pre-industrial to over [---] ppm today driven overwhelmingly by fossil fuel combustion. That's a 50% increase in a geological eyeblink. The greenhouse effect isn't a theory cooked up by bureaucrats - it was first described by Eunice Newton Foote in [----] and John Tyndall in [----] long before"
X Link 2026-02-15T15:48Z 11.1K followers, 22.2K engagements

"So Chris Martz blocked me. Chris Martz the guy who has built his entire brand on telling you that climate scientists NASA NOAA the IPCC the World Meteorological Organization every national academy of science on the planet the insurance industry the military and the global reinsurance market are all wrong blocked me. Not because I was rude. Not because I was trolling. Because I ratio'd him. On his own @algore tweet. Let that sink in. This man wakes up every morning ready to take on the collected expertise of every major scientific institution in the world. He'll look at [---] years of"
X Link 2026-02-15T16:10Z 11.1K followers, 28.7K engagements

"Fascinating. I listed [--] verifiable data points - global temperature records CO concentrations ice sheet melt rates insurance market collapses billion-dollar disasters - and your rebuttal is "you're ugly." That's it. That's the whole thing. No counter-data. No alternative explanation. No peer-reviewed citation. Just "I could destroy your argument but I won't." The internet equivalent of "I totally have a girlfriend she just goes to another school." You run an account called "SpaceWeatherNews" and you couldn't muster a single scientific sentence in response to basic atmospheric data. Not one."
X Link 2026-02-15T16:33Z 11.1K followers, 25.9K engagements

"@coastlinkr Ive never seen someone post pics of his/her diploma as much as he does"
X Link 2026-02-15T17:01Z 11.1K followers, [---] engagements

"Strike [--] swings at a phantom. "Zero evidence" that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere This has been established physics since Tyndall in [----] and Arrhenius in [----]. Ocean heat content has increased dramatically - over 90% of the excess heat trapped by greenhouse gases has gone into the oceans. ARGO float data satellite measurements and decades of oceanographic monitoring all confirm this. Saying there's "zero evidence" isn't skepticism it's denial of basic radiative physics that lets your TV remote work. Strike [--] is just. wrong. Greenland was not ice-free [----] years ago. The Greenland Ice"
X Link 2026-02-15T18:24Z 11.1K followers, [----] engagements

"@BobbyFi57075392 Honest question - do you think your conspiracy theory Google searches are than my degrees in the subject matter"
X Link 2026-02-15T23:33Z 11.1K followers, [---] engagements

"Every Winter Olympics host city since [----] has gotten warmer. Vancouver airlifted snow. Sochi hit 60F. Beijing used 100% fake snow. Salt Lake City hosts in [----] and has 0.1" of snow this season. Normal is 37+". Winter is changing. 🌡 #Olympics2026"
X Link 2026-02-16T17:07Z 11.1K followers, [---] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing

@ChrisGloninger
/creator/twitter::ChrisGloninger