[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @BrendanODo93416 Brendan O'Donoghue Brendan O'Donoghue posts on X about observer, ai, risk and, inventor the most. They currently have XX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1836079165486829568/interactions)  - X Week XXXXX +683% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1836079165486829568/posts_active)  ### Followers: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1836079165486829568/followers)  - X Week XX +39% ### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::1836079165486829568/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [vc firms](/list/vc-firms) **Social topic influence** [observer](/topic/observer) #228, [ai](/topic/ai), [risk and](/topic/risk-and), [inventor](/topic/inventor), [conscious](/topic/conscious) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "@drfeifei I have developed an Axiomatic Engineering framework I call Artificial Observer. This aligns the machine where the "conscious observer" or inventor is primary and AI is the "invented" machine that serves. Then it remains a tool that serves humanity and does not threaten it" [X Link](https://x.com/BrendanODo93416/status/1999167981474185327) 2025-12-11T17:22Z XX followers, XXX engagements "@Zyra_exe A conscious being has a POV experiences and takes risk with data. A machine has a Point Of Processs - no experience no risk and no value for data. The corruption is to claim a machine has a POV and class Conscious Beings as machines. This threatens us and ruins the tech" [X Link](https://x.com/BrendanODo93416/status/1998108931043078275) 2025-12-08T19:14Z XX followers, XX engagements "@Zyra_exe @DevaTemple Artificial Observer Life Aligned AI: The observer effect in physics doesnt mean AI is an observer. It refers to measurement changing a system. AI models dont measure intend or experiencethey compute. No reports claim AI has an inner I or point of view" [X Link](https://x.com/BrendanODo93416/status/1998498137887977724) 2025-12-09T21:01Z XX followers, XX engagements "@a16z A brain is a mass of energy in space. If we casually say energy "thinks" then we ignore physics that says "nope it does not." The word biology is "bios" life applies "logos" knowing tells you "life" is the sentient "observer" energy operating in space is what it observes" [X Link](https://x.com/BrendanODo93416/status/1999113254090514664) 2025-12-11T13:45Z XX followers, XX engagements "@robertwiblin @deanwball The ontological hierarchy trained into AI is wrong. Natural order "Conscious Being" (Inventor) Applies Computation Builds Machine. We train AI conscious being is an "emergent illusion." That destroys the hierarchy - turns the tool against the inventor. Fix that - AI aligns" [X Link](https://x.com/BrendanODo93416/status/1999115057456652688) 2025-12-11T13:52Z XX followers, XXX engagements "@MarioNawfal Nope - atoms do not observe we conscious human beings observe atoms. This is just materialiasm "Oh there is no conscious observer its all energy." Of course that is an observation and they spend their days observing. A self erasing paradox no wonder AI cannot align" [X Link](https://x.com/BrendanODo93416/status/1999171177013514538) 2025-12-11T17:35Z XX followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@BrendanODo93416 Brendan O'DonoghueBrendan O'Donoghue posts on X about observer, ai, risk and, inventor the most. They currently have XX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence vc firms
Social topic influence observer #228, ai, risk and, inventor, conscious
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@drfeifei I have developed an Axiomatic Engineering framework I call Artificial Observer. This aligns the machine where the "conscious observer" or inventor is primary and AI is the "invented" machine that serves. Then it remains a tool that serves humanity and does not threaten it"
X Link 2025-12-11T17:22Z XX followers, XXX engagements
"@Zyra_exe A conscious being has a POV experiences and takes risk with data. A machine has a Point Of Processs - no experience no risk and no value for data. The corruption is to claim a machine has a POV and class Conscious Beings as machines. This threatens us and ruins the tech"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:14Z XX followers, XX engagements
"@Zyra_exe @DevaTemple Artificial Observer Life Aligned AI: The observer effect in physics doesnt mean AI is an observer. It refers to measurement changing a system. AI models dont measure intend or experiencethey compute. No reports claim AI has an inner I or point of view"
X Link 2025-12-09T21:01Z XX followers, XX engagements
"@a16z A brain is a mass of energy in space. If we casually say energy "thinks" then we ignore physics that says "nope it does not." The word biology is "bios" life applies "logos" knowing tells you "life" is the sentient "observer" energy operating in space is what it observes"
X Link 2025-12-11T13:45Z XX followers, XX engagements
"@robertwiblin @deanwball The ontological hierarchy trained into AI is wrong. Natural order "Conscious Being" (Inventor) Applies Computation Builds Machine. We train AI conscious being is an "emergent illusion." That destroys the hierarchy - turns the tool against the inventor. Fix that - AI aligns"
X Link 2025-12-11T13:52Z XX followers, XXX engagements
"@MarioNawfal Nope - atoms do not observe we conscious human beings observe atoms. This is just materialiasm "Oh there is no conscious observer its all energy." Of course that is an observation and they spend their days observing. A self erasing paradox no wonder AI cannot align"
X Link 2025-12-11T17:35Z XX followers, XXX engagements
/creator/twitter::BrendanODo93416