[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @BitMEXResearch BitMEX Research BitMEX Research posts on X about bitcoin, core, bitcoin cash, bitmex the most. They currently have XXXXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::906870773066772480/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX +80% - X Month XXXXXXX -XX% - X Months XXXXXXXXX +200% - X Year XXXXXXXXX -XX% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::906870773066772480/posts_active)  - X Week XX -XX% - X Month XXX -XX% - X Months XXX +369% - X Year XXXXX +18% ### Followers: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::906870773066772480/followers)  - X Week XXXXXXX -XXXX% - X Month XXXXXXX -XXXX% - X Months XXXXXXX +0.14% - X Year XXXXXXX -XXXX% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::906870773066772480/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [exchanges](/list/exchanges) #313 [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) #1699 [finance](/list/finance) XXXX% [currencies](/list/currencies) XXXX% [automotive brands](/list/automotive-brands) XXXX% **Social topic influence** [bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) #685, [core](/topic/core) 15.38%, [bitcoin cash](/topic/bitcoin-cash) #129, [bitmex](/topic/bitmex) #2, [spam](/topic/spam) 3.85%, [maxwell](/topic/maxwell) 3.85%, [nfts](/topic/nfts) 3.85%, [the 15](/topic/the-15) 3.85%, [strong](/topic/strong) 3.85%, [truechain](/topic/truechain) XXXX% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@arthur_van_pelt](/creator/undefined) [@adam3us](/creator/undefined) [@murchandamus](/creator/undefined) [@dathon_ohm](/creator/undefined) [@malachirevolts](/creator/undefined) [@peetxbt](/creator/undefined) [@giacomozucco](/creator/undefined) [@bweys_nft](/creator/undefined) [@coincontroversy](/creator/undefined) [@14g23h34](/creator/undefined) [@mattkratter](/creator/undefined) [@rot13maxi](/creator/undefined) [@letenken](/creator/undefined) [@peterktodd](/creator/undefined) [@thebluematt](/creator/undefined) [@arthurvanpelt](/creator/undefined) [@ajtowns](/creator/undefined) [@btcefe](/creator/undefined) [@lukedashjr](/creator/undefined) [@anton__btc](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [Bitcoin Cash (BCH)](/topic/bitcoin-cash) [TrueChain (TRUE)](/topic/truechain) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Fighting talk from Gregory Maxwell on the Core v Knots spam debate" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1978545931600511157) 2025-10-15T19:38Z 119.4K followers, 621.7K engagements "Bitcoin NFT Market Update - XX Nov 2025 * Since our previous post on XX Aug 2025 the median price of the top XX NFTs on Bitcoin is down 36.7%. The median price is down XXXX% since the peak * In the period the Bitcoin price is down XX% in USD such that the USD decline in NFT prices is even greater * Turns out investing in onchain JPGs is not always entirely consistent with a Benjamin Graham "Intelligent Investor" type philosophy * Seems the JPS enjoyers are being defeated by basic market economics rather than filters or doomsday softfork threats like BIP-444" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1989349741277180157) 2025-11-14T15:08Z 119.4K followers, 45.2K engagements "has seen a decline in the percentage of Bitcoin Knots clients as its live peers since its launch at the start of Nov 2025 Bitcoin Knots down to just 8.4%" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1993779038402613484) 2025-11-26T20:29Z 119.4K followers, 8257 engagements "@TheBlueMatt @nic_carter @roasbeef If we add a new quantum safe tap leaf opcode will that remain quantum vulnerable until we ban all key path taproot spends If so then it's not really adding a quantum safe way to store Bitcoin" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1994321295605948505) 2025-11-28T08:23Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements "I think theres going to be zero adoption of a post-quantum scheme that doesnt fit neatly into current address schemes. I think by value (i.e. number of BTC) adoption of quantum safe schemes could be pretty strong even if there is like a 4KB signature on spend. Many people and entities with 1000 BTC want it to be quantum safe and will jump through hoops to get it. I really do not see why people would want to put money in a quantum safe tapleaf that is also quantum vulnerable by the key path when P2WSH is more quantum safe. Or maybe P2WSH with BIP XX 12/24 words is the most quantum safe place" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1994481451782250697) 2025-11-28T19:00Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements "@mattkratter The Bitcoin Core developers don't understand economics. Where have we heard that before Oh here:" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1996925944259281103) 2025-12-05T12:53Z 119.4K followers, 3071 engagements "@giacomozucco It makes sense that software version X removes Luke as a seed when that seed does not provide any peers running software version X Surely that's a no brainer" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1997032921744789532) 2025-12-05T19:58Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements "@Arthur_van_Pelt So now you only want people who have been brainwashed by economic departments in academic institutions contributing to Bitcoin Core" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1996530158577361195) 2025-12-04T10:40Z 119.4K followers, 4262 engagements "Bitcoin is secured by HUMAN ACTION not "energy." The energy involved is connected to the costliness of breaking the rules but it does not "enforce" the rules - we do. The "energy" is there to decide on which competing chain within the rules is the true chain" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1998366551817220224) 2025-12-09T12:18Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements "I have a small amount of sympathy with his comment that maybe we shouldn't ban XX byte transactions because there may be legitimate use cases for them. I tried to express that in the article. But I don't really care because such use cases seem unlikely. I don't think this apparent disadvantage applies to the three other things BIP XX fixes. The other parts of BIP XX ban things that would clearly only be there if it's an attack" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1998472976531075489) 2025-12-09T19:21Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements "@venorusprime "The Bitcoin Standard" Wow. The developers today have it so easy. Back in my day the developers were told they didn't understand economics unless they read "Human Action". That was a much harder read" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1996929006885560715) 2025-12-05T13:05Z 119.4K followers, 6383 engagements "64 Byte Transactions A XX byte Bitcoin transaction has the potential to be confused with an intermediate hashing step in Bitcoins Merkle tree because this is also XX bytes. We explore how this vulnerability can be exploited & look at a proposed fix" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1998383507693850765) 2025-12-09T13:25Z 119.4K followers, 23.9K engagements "@ajtowns The blog switched from wordpress to another system and we are in the process of fixing it In the meantime all the articles are available on" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1998473980219691100) 2025-12-09T19:25Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements "Exactly Neither Gloria nor the other maintainers are in an official position of power. They are not politicians & they don't need to have held senior positions in large corrupt & failing academic or banking institutions. If one wants that there are monetary policy committees & fiat currencies to invest in" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1996624112375013568) 2025-12-04T16:54Z 119.4K followers, 4231 engagements "Well claiming the developers do not understand economics is something "your side" has in common with the big blockers. There are many other reasons why "your side" is like the big blockers: Your opponents want to: * Develop and strengthen fee market * Mitigate slow block propagation issues (e.g. make Compact Blocks work well) * Build code based on the assumption that miners select transactions to maximise profits These were all identicle arguments in the blocksize war and they were all small block positions. The rhetoric from the knots camp also echos the big blockers in many ways. e.g. Core" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1996937897245659565) 2025-12-05T13:41Z 119.4K followers, 6156 engagements "@ajtowns We have just published the following table to help find all the links pre and post the wordpress transition" [X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1998477701930176520) 2025-12-09T19:39Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@BitMEXResearch BitMEX Research
BitMEX Research posts on X about bitcoin, core, bitcoin cash, bitmex the most. They currently have XXXXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXXXXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +80%
- X Month XXXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXXXXX +200%
- X Year XXXXXXXXX -XX%
Mentions: XX #
- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XXX -XX%
- X Months XXX +369%
- X Year XXXXX +18%
Followers: XXXXXXX #
- X Week XXXXXXX -XXXX%
- X Month XXXXXXX -XXXX%
- X Months XXXXXXX +0.14%
- X Year XXXXXXX -XXXX%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #
Social Influence
Social category influence exchanges #313 cryptocurrencies #1699 finance XXXX% currencies XXXX% automotive brands XXXX%
Social topic influence bitcoin #685, core 15.38%, bitcoin cash #129, bitmex #2, spam 3.85%, maxwell 3.85%, nfts 3.85%, the 15 3.85%, strong 3.85%, truechain XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @arthur_van_pelt @adam3us @murchandamus @dathon_ohm @malachirevolts @peetxbt @giacomozucco @bweys_nft @coincontroversy @14g23h34 @mattkratter @rot13maxi @letenken @peterktodd @thebluematt @arthurvanpelt @ajtowns @btcefe @lukedashjr @anton__btc
Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) Bitcoin Cash (BCH) TrueChain (TRUE)
Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Fighting talk from Gregory Maxwell on the Core v Knots spam debate"
X Link 2025-10-15T19:38Z 119.4K followers, 621.7K engagements
"Bitcoin NFT Market Update - XX Nov 2025 * Since our previous post on XX Aug 2025 the median price of the top XX NFTs on Bitcoin is down 36.7%. The median price is down XXXX% since the peak * In the period the Bitcoin price is down XX% in USD such that the USD decline in NFT prices is even greater * Turns out investing in onchain JPGs is not always entirely consistent with a Benjamin Graham "Intelligent Investor" type philosophy * Seems the JPS enjoyers are being defeated by basic market economics rather than filters or doomsday softfork threats like BIP-444"
X Link 2025-11-14T15:08Z 119.4K followers, 45.2K engagements
"has seen a decline in the percentage of Bitcoin Knots clients as its live peers since its launch at the start of Nov 2025 Bitcoin Knots down to just 8.4%"
X Link 2025-11-26T20:29Z 119.4K followers, 8257 engagements
"@TheBlueMatt @nic_carter @roasbeef If we add a new quantum safe tap leaf opcode will that remain quantum vulnerable until we ban all key path taproot spends If so then it's not really adding a quantum safe way to store Bitcoin"
X Link 2025-11-28T08:23Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements
"I think theres going to be zero adoption of a post-quantum scheme that doesnt fit neatly into current address schemes. I think by value (i.e. number of BTC) adoption of quantum safe schemes could be pretty strong even if there is like a 4KB signature on spend. Many people and entities with 1000 BTC want it to be quantum safe and will jump through hoops to get it. I really do not see why people would want to put money in a quantum safe tapleaf that is also quantum vulnerable by the key path when P2WSH is more quantum safe. Or maybe P2WSH with BIP XX 12/24 words is the most quantum safe place"
X Link 2025-11-28T19:00Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements
"@mattkratter The Bitcoin Core developers don't understand economics. Where have we heard that before Oh here:"
X Link 2025-12-05T12:53Z 119.4K followers, 3071 engagements
"@giacomozucco It makes sense that software version X removes Luke as a seed when that seed does not provide any peers running software version X Surely that's a no brainer"
X Link 2025-12-05T19:58Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements
"@Arthur_van_Pelt So now you only want people who have been brainwashed by economic departments in academic institutions contributing to Bitcoin Core"
X Link 2025-12-04T10:40Z 119.4K followers, 4262 engagements
"Bitcoin is secured by HUMAN ACTION not "energy." The energy involved is connected to the costliness of breaking the rules but it does not "enforce" the rules - we do. The "energy" is there to decide on which competing chain within the rules is the true chain"
X Link 2025-12-09T12:18Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements
"I have a small amount of sympathy with his comment that maybe we shouldn't ban XX byte transactions because there may be legitimate use cases for them. I tried to express that in the article. But I don't really care because such use cases seem unlikely. I don't think this apparent disadvantage applies to the three other things BIP XX fixes. The other parts of BIP XX ban things that would clearly only be there if it's an attack"
X Link 2025-12-09T19:21Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements
"@venorusprime "The Bitcoin Standard" Wow. The developers today have it so easy. Back in my day the developers were told they didn't understand economics unless they read "Human Action". That was a much harder read"
X Link 2025-12-05T13:05Z 119.4K followers, 6383 engagements
"64 Byte Transactions A XX byte Bitcoin transaction has the potential to be confused with an intermediate hashing step in Bitcoins Merkle tree because this is also XX bytes. We explore how this vulnerability can be exploited & look at a proposed fix"
X Link 2025-12-09T13:25Z 119.4K followers, 23.9K engagements
"@ajtowns The blog switched from wordpress to another system and we are in the process of fixing it In the meantime all the articles are available on"
X Link 2025-12-09T19:25Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements
"Exactly Neither Gloria nor the other maintainers are in an official position of power. They are not politicians & they don't need to have held senior positions in large corrupt & failing academic or banking institutions. If one wants that there are monetary policy committees & fiat currencies to invest in"
X Link 2025-12-04T16:54Z 119.4K followers, 4231 engagements
"Well claiming the developers do not understand economics is something "your side" has in common with the big blockers. There are many other reasons why "your side" is like the big blockers: Your opponents want to: * Develop and strengthen fee market * Mitigate slow block propagation issues (e.g. make Compact Blocks work well) * Build code based on the assumption that miners select transactions to maximise profits These were all identicle arguments in the blocksize war and they were all small block positions. The rhetoric from the knots camp also echos the big blockers in many ways. e.g. Core"
X Link 2025-12-05T13:41Z 119.4K followers, 6156 engagements
"@ajtowns We have just published the following table to help find all the links pre and post the wordpress transition"
X Link 2025-12-09T19:39Z 119.4K followers, XXX engagements