Dark | Light
# ![@AxisLuti Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1896591494246707200.png) @AxisLuti Axis Luti

Axis Luti posts on X about pra, math, quem, porque the most. They currently have [--] followers and [--] posts still getting attention that total [---] engagements in the last [--] hours.

### Engagements: [---] [#](/creator/twitter::1896591494246707200/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1896591494246707200/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- [--] Month [-----] +947%

### Mentions: [--] [#](/creator/twitter::1896591494246707200/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1896591494246707200/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)


### Followers: [--] [#](/creator/twitter::1896591494246707200/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1896591494246707200/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- [--] Month [--] +100%

### CreatorRank: [---------] [#](/creator/twitter::1896591494246707200/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1896591494246707200/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  [social networks](/list/social-networks)  [stocks](/list/stocks) 

**Social topic influence**
[pra](/topic/pra), [math](/topic/math), [quem](/topic/quem), [porque](/topic/porque), [nem](/topic/nem), [vez](/topic/vez), [nada](/topic/nada), [aqui](/topic/aqui), [ter](/topic/ter), [science](/topic/science)

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@philipgoff](/creator/undefined) [@larireidelas](/creator/undefined) [@krlhdc](/creator/undefined) [@smileygate](/creator/undefined) [@thisiseasy](/creator/undefined) [@luaaluan](/creator/undefined) [@this_is_easy](/creator/undefined) [@lua_aluan](/creator/undefined) [@jkoomunista](/creator/undefined) [@morriganlefayy](/creator/undefined) [@maluizalvs](/creator/undefined) [@cuhorin90109](/creator/undefined) [@_morriganlefayy](/creator/undefined) [@mathfiles](/creator/undefined) [@grok](/creator/undefined) [@smiley_gate](/creator/undefined) [@henryrockford](/creator/undefined) [@pastormikewill](/creator/undefined) [@yuri5478578](/creator/undefined) [@palaeophilo](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Exponent Inc (EXPO)](/topic/$expo) [Intuit Inc. (INTU)](/topic/$intu)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"@croftsblade Saw that other post elsewhere sharing here for completion: https://t.co/wW1h3Sib5s https://t.co/wW1h3Sib5s"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/1999970564350541941)  2025-12-13T22:31Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@JPHalsall @everymovieandtv https://www.sportskeeda.com/tennis/news-venus-serena-williams-lost-203rd-ranked-male-tennis-player-swimmer-riley-gaines-inclusion-trans-athletes https://www.sportskeeda.com/tennis/news-venus-serena-williams-lost-203rd-ranked-male-tennis-player-swimmer-riley-gaines-inclusion-trans-athletes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2005870322965152223)  2025-12-30T05:15Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@LaviTheGman @Math_files I take it that the exponentiation (1x) m means the unit m-plied n times so [--] is the unit doubled [--] times: to [--] then to [--] then to [--]. So [--] is the unit 0-plied (multiplied by zero) *zero* times: so not multiplied at all therefore remaining untouched: 1"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2012130486097948719)  2026-01-16T11:51Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@Henry_Rockford @Math_files The exponent n of m just says how many times the unit [--] is being m-plied thats true in general. So if n = [--] then obviously the unit is being m-plied [--] times and thats exactly the same as not being multiplied-by-m at all"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2012503899366736272)  2026-01-17T12:34Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@Henry_Rockford @Math_files If n counts steps you take in a walk n = [--] says you took [--] steps in your walk. How to intuit TAKING zero steps Easy: you didnt take steps at all (rather than you DID take steps: zero). 1*no m isnt 1*0 (as in 1*not-m) its just [--] not*m. Watch the scope of not"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2012508798766752012)  2026-01-17T12:54Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@Matt84books @rsimmons11234 @avidseries No way. Sam Harris is far from having that ludicrous knee-jerk reaction of so you are just retarded blocked at pretty much ANY sign of slight disagreement. Its been years of Taleb doing that ensuring to be surrounded by dick-suckers only"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2021308202323767655)  2026-02-10T19:40Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@Mhiz_Lynn @hell_line0 Context: women are selective (evolution) so the average man just isnt good enough for the average woman. Thats not the fault of either sex (its not that men dont do enough: if they did women would still pick the 10% better). So women will compete for the top 10% or so"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2021838517026935152)  2026-02-12T06:47Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@Karn338331 @IsThisA3DModel There are Star Wars channels with thoughtful AI scenes that are high-regarded in the fandom surely showing the potential. I think its already inevitable that we will have fan made movies the best of which will become popular and legendary regarded as godlike masterpieces"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022036272815219085)  2026-02-12T19:53Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@mr_davi_7 @seixaasz @gloriozu Nah Fla-Flu o nome do confronto mas TAMBM um nome composto: composto pelo nome abreviado dos clubes (coisa que Derby no ). Ento sim Fluminense nominalmente mencionado no hino do Flamengo"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022043606601937324)  2026-02-12T20:22Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@disfigured_cell @macojeco Ah v. Dominncia masculina universal no s em nossa espcie mas em mamferos. S porque voc consegue pegar algumas sociedades humanas e *forar uma interpretao* em que em certo sentido mulheres podem ser consideradas dominantes isso no significa nada"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022138959363748245)  2026-02-13T02:41Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@HenriqueSTO1 O que que tem a ver 0.1% dos homens tomarem tais atitudes extremas exatamente como uma minoria de mulheres tambm faz com misoginia No h nem a mais vaga relao causal comprovada ou sequer plausvel. muita viagem na maionese ideolgica"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022156515436892496)  2026-02-13T03:50Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@PastorMikeWill @SirKrispyiii @asteriskkkk_ All of human life ever plus darwinian logic plus many studies better than this one showing the opposite (in a field where 60%+ of findings cant be replicated). This very study refers to all the others showing the STATED preference of women for older"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022160041256923408)  2026-02-13T04:04Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Algum disse ou sequer sugeriu ou vagamente aludiu que se ele tivesse matado a mulher ento a no seria ruim No nem 1%. Zero. Mas voc precisa fingir que ISSO o que est sendo dito. Mas ok o mais burro sou eu mesmo de ainda estar respondendo"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022671058235506863)  2026-02-14T13:55Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@bug_mc @MallymkunMousey No intense sparky I met my crush look here. Anyone can see it in the other image to the point I cant believe those who deny it. At BEST they honestly think: it does look a bit crush-y but its just a frame doesnt have to mean anything"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022674390379565442)  2026-02-14T14:08Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@_MorriganLefayy @maluizalvs @cuhorin90109 Vc s postou a opinio de um psicanalista. Vale tanto quanto a opinio de um astrlogo. Sociologia e psicologia so reas onde 70% dos estudos no so reproduzidos. Aqui uma BATERIA de evidncias pra voc ignorar e continuar acreditando no que DESEJA: https://x.com/i/grok/share/17ac971e3f474eb5848f578c6f01b7c6 https://x.com/i/grok/share/17ac971e3f474eb5848f578c6f01b7c6"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022784779268043024)  2026-02-14T21:27Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@Yuri5478578 @Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Toda analogia compara duas coisas DIFERENTES que compartilham alguma SEMELHANA RELEVANTE. Aqui a semelhana o assassino estranhamente matar quem no o prejudicou em vez de quem o prejudicou portanto a analogia SE APLICA. Focar nas diferenas s burrice mesmo"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022786063186415654)  2026-02-14T21:32Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@jkoomunista @larireidelas @krlhdc NINGUM est dizendo que traio motivo pra matar que matar foi certo que matar era necessrio ento vcs todos aqui esto criticando um bicho-papo que s existe na cabecinha moralista de vocs. O ponto que J QUE MATOU bizarro ter matado quem no o prejudicou"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022787010155479338)  2026-02-14T21:36Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc E seria mesmo oras: MENOS PIOR. S burro no v isso. Pra comear seria matar [--] pessoa em vez de [--]. E seria matar quem ao menos escolheu causar sofrimento no assassino. Esses dois FATOS so compatveis com outro FATO que NINGUM negou: matar a mulher seria errado TAMBM"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022789646464278949)  2026-02-14T21:46Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Voc est comparando *matar a mulher* com *apenas divorciar*. BVIO (pqp ter q explicar isso) que no menos pior matar a mulher. MAS A PORRA DA COMPARAO era entre *matar a mulher* e *matar os filhos*. chocante como moralismo viciado DESLIGA o raciocnio bsico"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022793144496967742)  2026-02-14T22:00Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@hannystiltskin @AnKappataz @ggffgiffoni @clarionrox Voc precisa entender como funciona a seleo natural. Seu pai pode saber 100% intelectualmente mas INSTINTIVAMENTE o crebro masculino no tem certeza porque evoluiu num ambiente onde no dava pra ter. Mulheres ao contrrio sempre tiveram 100% de certeza instintiva"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022794938568654982)  2026-02-14T22:07Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Vc acabou de dizer que o raciocnio bsico moral ao se comparar matar a mulher e matar os filhos que seria PIOR PARA OS FILHOS sobreviver com o pai matando a me deles em vez deles. Com isso eu posso me dar o luxo de nem sequer precisar argumentar mais. Obrigado"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022806596326158387)  2026-02-14T22:54Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Nah no way. [--] + [--] = [--] is obvious objective truth no matter how one twist things trying to justify skepticism of this sort. The odds of we building ANY functional tech if reasoning didnt track reality would be astronomicallygoogolplex low. Reason does grasp necessities"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023147722665230393)  2026-02-15T21:29Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Also EVEN if math were empirical like that descriptive of a reality thats shared it would still be discovered not created clearly. Edited in: the *correct* map of Utah once Utah itself is settled must be discovered obviously"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023164702914674780)  2026-02-15T22:37Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@chrisrusseltech @thegenesisbl0ck I cant quite believe you. I mean sure flirty is too strong. But her intense sparky look is unmistakable: it has involuntary great attraction written in it. I even find it obvious that Cooper caught it herself and quickly and deliberately recomposed herself right away"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022665911447228442)  2026-02-14T13:35Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@_MorriganLefayy @maluizalvs @cuhorin90109 Seu prprio link me d COMPLETA razo. A concluso exatamente o que eu penso: biologia explica a agressividade masculina no desculpa (falcia naturalista) nem torna inevitvel (determinismo) coisas que s existem na cabea dos crticos ignorantes da evoluo"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022823449115213913)  2026-02-15T00:01Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff We just disagree. And its bedrock disagreement it seems: math is clearly discovered not created. If aliens have math it will agree with our math. (One thing it isnt that reason dictates reality rather some objective necessities dictate reality and reason can grasp them)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023151956143771904)  2026-02-15T21:46Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff We dont do arithmetic geometry or real analysis by empirical investigation (unlike physics or chemistry). No experiment ever could give us pi past a dozen decimal places or PROVE any theorem. And if reality seems to disagree with math that seeming reality is necessarily wrong"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023163140125384786)  2026-02-15T22:30Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@gosc101 @PatDannes78 @cboyack I mean I couldve argued instead (as if that ever helps lol). But I truly got the feeling that youre on the verge of seeing for yourself your mistakes given how stretched and overdone are your points. I had to at least test pushing you over the edge. Egoism is ok. Embrace it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023181224018391438)  2026-02-15T23:42Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@God_trustmebro @William226160 Even if thats true it CLEARLY is beside the point: had the nazis actually made legal to kill jews as they could have done that still wouldnt count as murder in your technical sense. So what That still shows how spurious is your point about abortion"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023185792827629617)  2026-02-16T00:00Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@LiloVLOG Dito isso eu j fui erroneamente acusado de postar texto de IA (uma longa e detalhada argumentao que fiz no YouTube). A de foder porque voc no tem como provar que seu texto legtimo"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022474242911248561)  2026-02-14T00:53Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@notsuasnega Sim e por razes evolutivas (maior agressividade masculina entre todos os mamferos) mas nem 1% dos homens comete esses crimes ento qualquer generalizao s ridcula mesmo"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022495957217349936)  2026-02-14T02:19Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@_MorriganLefayy @maluizalvs @cuhorin90109 Achei at que violncia contra mulher viesse 90% de homens que so mais agressivos por natureza. Mas isso no d razo ao feminismo j que menos de 1% dos homens comete esses 75% (ou que seja 90%) de violncia contra a mulher. Os homens em geral no tm nada com isso"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022531108005388626)  2026-02-14T04:39Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Im atheist strongly darwinian in case it seems otherwise. And fully agree that science is vastly more useful metaphysics might even be useless. Still truth doesnt care about usefulness and philosophy is about truth. Science isnt even trying to get reality *as such* right"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022900668743160214)  2026-02-15T05:07Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff In epistemology Im a rationalist and I would totally disagree that science *by itself* presupposes empiricism in any way: science is empirical data *plus a priori reasoning* so not empiricist. Long convo anyway"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022901443275919565)  2026-02-15T05:11Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@PalaeoPhilo @EveryDarkStar1 @MathezarT @Philip_Goff Is that some blend of foundationalism and coherentism Be it as it may it would be a crazily long convo for twitter thats for sure"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022901973994082625)  2026-02-15T05:13Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@TezzaLap @mattwridley It would be no different *in principle* if the kind of movement that the gasoline makes inside the engine just gave rise to a feeling; or even that certain Lego structures and not others gave rise to Lego ghosts. If this *happened* we would rather suspect simulation. 2/2"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023019338182324514)  2026-02-15T12:59Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Not true. We could as well *experience* that every time we join [--] objects with [--] objects we somehow get [--] objects. We still wouldnt find [--] + [--] = [--] intuitive nor revise math. We would rather say that physics somehow creates ex-nihilo in such cases. Reason is independent"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023149864809554193)  2026-02-15T21:38Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@Dr_Gingerballs How can you not see that you can only push that cope so far You are already stretching it to its limit here to say the least and AI accelerating science 1000x is just in its very beginning"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022595074106728783)  2026-02-14T08:53Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@larireidelas @krlhdc Porra qual a DIFICULDADE de entender que ela quis dizer J QUE RESOLVEU MATAR que ao menos matasse a responsvel pela traio no os filhos inocentes. E qualquer um entende isso mas uns no resistem a chance de se exibir com chilique moralista por motivo nenhum"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022633208698016151)  2026-02-14T11:25Z [--] followers, [----] engagements


"@arielxerecaBet @nahbrisaaaa Homens (ou machos em geral) so mais agressivos por razes evolutivas claras o que UM modo muito especfico de ser emocional. No tem nada a ver com o sentido muito diferente e mais amplo em que as mulheres so mais emocionais: se guiam mais por feeling que por lgica"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022641292103004547)  2026-02-14T11:57Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Quer dizer que se eu for assaltado e em vez de matar o ladro matar o meu vizinho ningum seria RACIONAL de pergurtar: u Se era pra matar por que no matou o ladro ia aparecer voc dizendo mas no era pra matar ningum COMO SE ALGUM ESTIVESSE DISCORDANDO DISSO"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022647093232275792)  2026-02-14T12:20Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Vc est fingindo no entender. Pegue todas as pessoas que CONCORDAM 100% que idealmente no pra matar ningum (incluindo eu e a pessoa do post em questo): AINDA RACIONAL perguntar porque um assassino escolheu matar quem NO o prejudicou em vez de quem o prejudicou"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022651431421944241)  2026-02-14T12:37Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc J falei que concordo 100% que no se deveria matar ningum em nenhum dos casos o que j era bvio desde o post original mas voc PRECISA dessa confuso a todo custo. Por qu o assassino matou quem no tinha nada a ver AARGH NO SE DEVE MATAAAR NINGUM QI [--] pqp"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022659525959188720)  2026-02-14T13:09Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc As duas coisas so verdade: no deveria ter morte e j que TEVE morte ESTRANHO que a pessoa vitimada no seja quem prejudicou o assassino e RACIONAL perceber essa estranheza. Voc insistir que uma coisa exclui a outra s teimosia mesmo pra no dizer coisa pior"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022666756523749575)  2026-02-14T13:38Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@_MorriganLefayy @maluizalvs @cuhorin90109 Isso a sim pseudocincia. Psicanlise no tem a menor base causal ou confirmao emprica. E s de voc sugerir que uma afirmao FACTUAL sobre a natureza masculina justificativa pra violncia j mostra que no compreende lgica bsica: descrio no implica prescrio"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022680070343528657)  2026-02-14T14:31Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@AuContraire9 @Philip_Goff There are a ton of anti-metaphysical takes either properly philosophical or just naively ideological (like scientism) but a minimal success of metaphysics that an objective reality can clearly be inferred from our shared subjective experiences shouldnt really be disputed"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022898249359905096)  2026-02-15T04:58Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@JanaDahoui @longshott Voc parou pra avisar os policiais enquanto simultaneamente batendo foto deles e os filmando 🤔"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022974827854696948)  2026-02-15T10:02Z [--] followers, [----] engagements


"@S2jurupinga @larireidelas @krlhdc Ta uma explicao razovel e racional pra atitude do assassino que obviamente no dizer que o ato dele foi justificado embora todos os asnos que comentaram aqui tendem a interpretar exatamente assim (pelo menos quando QUEREM pra poder lacrar)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023007969009619293)  2026-02-15T12:14Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@TezzaLap @mattwridley They might be or not. Depends on a bunch of other assumptions. But whatever is the physical cause of subjectivity the mystery is the same. Say its your kind of complexity: its still as if magic that such complexity is suddenly accompanied by subjectivity. 1/2"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023019003288174907)  2026-02-15T12:58Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Observable just means SOMETHING produces the subjective experiences we get in 1st person. Science is literally based on the shared experiences themselves NOT in whatever reality is causing it: THAT cant be empirical. Only inference and reasoning (philosophy) can get there"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022897188242886683)  2026-02-15T04:54Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff We are talking past each other: terms like math and physics name both the theory (the map) and the object of the theory (what the map describes). Math the theory is about quantities and spatial relations in the abstract: those are not empirical. Nor invented. We do 1/2"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023207856980271218)  2026-02-16T01:28Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff create the theories and the maps BY discovering (not inventing) the objective facts they are about whether that knowledge is empirical or a priori. The classic divide about math is whether its discovered *or invented* in that sense. Chess is invented math is not. 2/2"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023208123071447137)  2026-02-16T01:29Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@grok @immy_jpeg @MC34197342 @frankmugisha Ok I stand corrected then. Homosexuality IS natural in that sense. Still an irrelevant truth against religious-based indictment of homosexuality as I already argued"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023573325167956212)  2026-02-17T01:40Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@jkoomunista @larireidelas @krlhdc ENTRE matar um inocente e matar cinco inocentes o q menos pior Na sua cabea luntica essa pergunta tem resposta porque O MENOS PIOR MATAR ZERO PESSOAS como se ISSO q ningum discorda tivesse a ver com a pergunta feita. Ainda alucina defesa de feminicdio pqp"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022808037975540023)  2026-02-14T22:59Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@jkoomunista @larireidelas @krlhdc Sua cabea que t contaminada pelo moralismo e no consegue mais pensar logicamente. INCAPAZ de dizer o BVIO: melhor mesmo matar [--] inocentes mas ENTRE matar [--] e [--] inocentes matar s [--] o menos pior. E eu sou o burro. 😅😅😅"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2022846111896023183)  2026-02-15T01:31Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Theoretical physics isnt modern math lmfao: its *intended* to match the empirical data and correctly thrown out when it fails to do so. But if empirical data contravenes *pure math* like delivering [--] as prime or circles where pi = [--] then its for sure wrong"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023209354606817637)  2026-02-16T01:34Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Theoretical physics is *applied* math which just includes contingent (observed) quantitative facts that couldnt be proved independently of empirical data unlike actual pure math. SURELY you get my point. OBVIOUSLY applied math is empirical. That says nothing about pure math"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023214794942415018)  2026-02-16T01:56Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Im no platonist believing math facts somehow EXIST ABSTRACTLY but I do think mathematical truths are objectively true anyway being about abstract facts: structural facts that arent grounded in existence. Kinda like past facts: the past doesnt exist ANYMORE. Still objective"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023216216693719115)  2026-02-16T02:01Z [--] followers, [--] engagements


"@immy_jpeg @MC34197342 @frankmugisha @grok The way I read it and christians do think that way it is a sin against God is meant to be the reason WHY homo is unnatural not a separate claim. So in their sense it can be like a disease: it does happen naturally (in YOUR sense not theirs) but you better fix it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/AxisLuti/status/2023577928542384413)  2026-02-17T01:59Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing

@AxisLuti Avatar @AxisLuti Axis Luti

Axis Luti posts on X about pra, math, quem, porque the most. They currently have [--] followers and [--] posts still getting attention that total [---] engagements in the last [--] hours.

Engagements: [---] #

Engagements Line Chart

  • [--] Month [-----] +947%

Mentions: [--] #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: [--] #

Followers Line Chart

  • [--] Month [--] +100%

CreatorRank: [---------] #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence technology brands social networks stocks

Social topic influence pra, math, quem, porque, nem, vez, nada, aqui, ter, science

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @philipgoff @larireidelas @krlhdc @smileygate @thisiseasy @luaaluan @this_is_easy @lua_aluan @jkoomunista @morriganlefayy @maluizalvs @cuhorin90109 @_morriganlefayy @mathfiles @grok @smiley_gate @henryrockford @pastormikewill @yuri5478578 @palaeophilo

Top assets mentioned Exponent Inc (EXPO) Intuit Inc. (INTU)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"@croftsblade Saw that other post elsewhere sharing here for completion: https://t.co/wW1h3Sib5s https://t.co/wW1h3Sib5s"
X Link 2025-12-13T22:31Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@JPHalsall @everymovieandtv https://www.sportskeeda.com/tennis/news-venus-serena-williams-lost-203rd-ranked-male-tennis-player-swimmer-riley-gaines-inclusion-trans-athletes https://www.sportskeeda.com/tennis/news-venus-serena-williams-lost-203rd-ranked-male-tennis-player-swimmer-riley-gaines-inclusion-trans-athletes"
X Link 2025-12-30T05:15Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@LaviTheGman @Math_files I take it that the exponentiation (1x) m means the unit m-plied n times so [--] is the unit doubled [--] times: to [--] then to [--] then to [--]. So [--] is the unit 0-plied (multiplied by zero) zero times: so not multiplied at all therefore remaining untouched: 1"
X Link 2026-01-16T11:51Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Henry_Rockford @Math_files The exponent n of m just says how many times the unit [--] is being m-plied thats true in general. So if n = [--] then obviously the unit is being m-plied [--] times and thats exactly the same as not being multiplied-by-m at all"
X Link 2026-01-17T12:34Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Henry_Rockford @Math_files If n counts steps you take in a walk n = [--] says you took [--] steps in your walk. How to intuit TAKING zero steps Easy: you didnt take steps at all (rather than you DID take steps: zero). 1no m isnt 10 (as in 1not-m) its just [--] notm. Watch the scope of not"
X Link 2026-01-17T12:54Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Matt84books @rsimmons11234 @avidseries No way. Sam Harris is far from having that ludicrous knee-jerk reaction of so you are just retarded blocked at pretty much ANY sign of slight disagreement. Its been years of Taleb doing that ensuring to be surrounded by dick-suckers only"
X Link 2026-02-10T19:40Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Mhiz_Lynn @hell_line0 Context: women are selective (evolution) so the average man just isnt good enough for the average woman. Thats not the fault of either sex (its not that men dont do enough: if they did women would still pick the 10% better). So women will compete for the top 10% or so"
X Link 2026-02-12T06:47Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Karn338331 @IsThisA3DModel There are Star Wars channels with thoughtful AI scenes that are high-regarded in the fandom surely showing the potential. I think its already inevitable that we will have fan made movies the best of which will become popular and legendary regarded as godlike masterpieces"
X Link 2026-02-12T19:53Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@mr_davi_7 @seixaasz @gloriozu Nah Fla-Flu o nome do confronto mas TAMBM um nome composto: composto pelo nome abreviado dos clubes (coisa que Derby no ). Ento sim Fluminense nominalmente mencionado no hino do Flamengo"
X Link 2026-02-12T20:22Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@disfigured_cell @macojeco Ah v. Dominncia masculina universal no s em nossa espcie mas em mamferos. S porque voc consegue pegar algumas sociedades humanas e forar uma interpretao em que em certo sentido mulheres podem ser consideradas dominantes isso no significa nada"
X Link 2026-02-13T02:41Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@HenriqueSTO1 O que que tem a ver 0.1% dos homens tomarem tais atitudes extremas exatamente como uma minoria de mulheres tambm faz com misoginia No h nem a mais vaga relao causal comprovada ou sequer plausvel. muita viagem na maionese ideolgica"
X Link 2026-02-13T03:50Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@PastorMikeWill @SirKrispyiii @asteriskkkk_ All of human life ever plus darwinian logic plus many studies better than this one showing the opposite (in a field where 60%+ of findings cant be replicated). This very study refers to all the others showing the STATED preference of women for older"
X Link 2026-02-13T04:04Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Algum disse ou sequer sugeriu ou vagamente aludiu que se ele tivesse matado a mulher ento a no seria ruim No nem 1%. Zero. Mas voc precisa fingir que ISSO o que est sendo dito. Mas ok o mais burro sou eu mesmo de ainda estar respondendo"
X Link 2026-02-14T13:55Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@bug_mc @MallymkunMousey No intense sparky I met my crush look here. Anyone can see it in the other image to the point I cant believe those who deny it. At BEST they honestly think: it does look a bit crush-y but its just a frame doesnt have to mean anything"
X Link 2026-02-14T14:08Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@_MorriganLefayy @maluizalvs @cuhorin90109 Vc s postou a opinio de um psicanalista. Vale tanto quanto a opinio de um astrlogo. Sociologia e psicologia so reas onde 70% dos estudos no so reproduzidos. Aqui uma BATERIA de evidncias pra voc ignorar e continuar acreditando no que DESEJA: https://x.com/i/grok/share/17ac971e3f474eb5848f578c6f01b7c6 https://x.com/i/grok/share/17ac971e3f474eb5848f578c6f01b7c6"
X Link 2026-02-14T21:27Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Yuri5478578 @Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Toda analogia compara duas coisas DIFERENTES que compartilham alguma SEMELHANA RELEVANTE. Aqui a semelhana o assassino estranhamente matar quem no o prejudicou em vez de quem o prejudicou portanto a analogia SE APLICA. Focar nas diferenas s burrice mesmo"
X Link 2026-02-14T21:32Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@jkoomunista @larireidelas @krlhdc NINGUM est dizendo que traio motivo pra matar que matar foi certo que matar era necessrio ento vcs todos aqui esto criticando um bicho-papo que s existe na cabecinha moralista de vocs. O ponto que J QUE MATOU bizarro ter matado quem no o prejudicou"
X Link 2026-02-14T21:36Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc E seria mesmo oras: MENOS PIOR. S burro no v isso. Pra comear seria matar [--] pessoa em vez de [--]. E seria matar quem ao menos escolheu causar sofrimento no assassino. Esses dois FATOS so compatveis com outro FATO que NINGUM negou: matar a mulher seria errado TAMBM"
X Link 2026-02-14T21:46Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Voc est comparando matar a mulher com apenas divorciar. BVIO (pqp ter q explicar isso) que no menos pior matar a mulher. MAS A PORRA DA COMPARAO era entre matar a mulher e matar os filhos. chocante como moralismo viciado DESLIGA o raciocnio bsico"
X Link 2026-02-14T22:00Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@hannystiltskin @AnKappataz @ggffgiffoni @clarionrox Voc precisa entender como funciona a seleo natural. Seu pai pode saber 100% intelectualmente mas INSTINTIVAMENTE o crebro masculino no tem certeza porque evoluiu num ambiente onde no dava pra ter. Mulheres ao contrrio sempre tiveram 100% de certeza instintiva"
X Link 2026-02-14T22:07Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Vc acabou de dizer que o raciocnio bsico moral ao se comparar matar a mulher e matar os filhos que seria PIOR PARA OS FILHOS sobreviver com o pai matando a me deles em vez deles. Com isso eu posso me dar o luxo de nem sequer precisar argumentar mais. Obrigado"
X Link 2026-02-14T22:54Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Nah no way. [--] + [--] = [--] is obvious objective truth no matter how one twist things trying to justify skepticism of this sort. The odds of we building ANY functional tech if reasoning didnt track reality would be astronomicallygoogolplex low. Reason does grasp necessities"
X Link 2026-02-15T21:29Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Also EVEN if math were empirical like that descriptive of a reality thats shared it would still be discovered not created clearly. Edited in: the correct map of Utah once Utah itself is settled must be discovered obviously"
X Link 2026-02-15T22:37Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@chrisrusseltech @thegenesisbl0ck I cant quite believe you. I mean sure flirty is too strong. But her intense sparky look is unmistakable: it has involuntary great attraction written in it. I even find it obvious that Cooper caught it herself and quickly and deliberately recomposed herself right away"
X Link 2026-02-14T13:35Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@_MorriganLefayy @maluizalvs @cuhorin90109 Seu prprio link me d COMPLETA razo. A concluso exatamente o que eu penso: biologia explica a agressividade masculina no desculpa (falcia naturalista) nem torna inevitvel (determinismo) coisas que s existem na cabea dos crticos ignorantes da evoluo"
X Link 2026-02-15T00:01Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff We just disagree. And its bedrock disagreement it seems: math is clearly discovered not created. If aliens have math it will agree with our math. (One thing it isnt that reason dictates reality rather some objective necessities dictate reality and reason can grasp them)"
X Link 2026-02-15T21:46Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff We dont do arithmetic geometry or real analysis by empirical investigation (unlike physics or chemistry). No experiment ever could give us pi past a dozen decimal places or PROVE any theorem. And if reality seems to disagree with math that seeming reality is necessarily wrong"
X Link 2026-02-15T22:30Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@gosc101 @PatDannes78 @cboyack I mean I couldve argued instead (as if that ever helps lol). But I truly got the feeling that youre on the verge of seeing for yourself your mistakes given how stretched and overdone are your points. I had to at least test pushing you over the edge. Egoism is ok. Embrace it"
X Link 2026-02-15T23:42Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@God_trustmebro @William226160 Even if thats true it CLEARLY is beside the point: had the nazis actually made legal to kill jews as they could have done that still wouldnt count as murder in your technical sense. So what That still shows how spurious is your point about abortion"
X Link 2026-02-16T00:00Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@LiloVLOG Dito isso eu j fui erroneamente acusado de postar texto de IA (uma longa e detalhada argumentao que fiz no YouTube). A de foder porque voc no tem como provar que seu texto legtimo"
X Link 2026-02-14T00:53Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@notsuasnega Sim e por razes evolutivas (maior agressividade masculina entre todos os mamferos) mas nem 1% dos homens comete esses crimes ento qualquer generalizao s ridcula mesmo"
X Link 2026-02-14T02:19Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@_MorriganLefayy @maluizalvs @cuhorin90109 Achei at que violncia contra mulher viesse 90% de homens que so mais agressivos por natureza. Mas isso no d razo ao feminismo j que menos de 1% dos homens comete esses 75% (ou que seja 90%) de violncia contra a mulher. Os homens em geral no tm nada com isso"
X Link 2026-02-14T04:39Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Im atheist strongly darwinian in case it seems otherwise. And fully agree that science is vastly more useful metaphysics might even be useless. Still truth doesnt care about usefulness and philosophy is about truth. Science isnt even trying to get reality as such right"
X Link 2026-02-15T05:07Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff In epistemology Im a rationalist and I would totally disagree that science by itself presupposes empiricism in any way: science is empirical data plus a priori reasoning so not empiricist. Long convo anyway"
X Link 2026-02-15T05:11Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@PalaeoPhilo @EveryDarkStar1 @MathezarT @Philip_Goff Is that some blend of foundationalism and coherentism Be it as it may it would be a crazily long convo for twitter thats for sure"
X Link 2026-02-15T05:13Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@TezzaLap @mattwridley It would be no different in principle if the kind of movement that the gasoline makes inside the engine just gave rise to a feeling; or even that certain Lego structures and not others gave rise to Lego ghosts. If this happened we would rather suspect simulation. 2/2"
X Link 2026-02-15T12:59Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Not true. We could as well experience that every time we join [--] objects with [--] objects we somehow get [--] objects. We still wouldnt find [--] + [--] = [--] intuitive nor revise math. We would rather say that physics somehow creates ex-nihilo in such cases. Reason is independent"
X Link 2026-02-15T21:38Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Dr_Gingerballs How can you not see that you can only push that cope so far You are already stretching it to its limit here to say the least and AI accelerating science 1000x is just in its very beginning"
X Link 2026-02-14T08:53Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@larireidelas @krlhdc Porra qual a DIFICULDADE de entender que ela quis dizer J QUE RESOLVEU MATAR que ao menos matasse a responsvel pela traio no os filhos inocentes. E qualquer um entende isso mas uns no resistem a chance de se exibir com chilique moralista por motivo nenhum"
X Link 2026-02-14T11:25Z [--] followers, [----] engagements

"@arielxerecaBet @nahbrisaaaa Homens (ou machos em geral) so mais agressivos por razes evolutivas claras o que UM modo muito especfico de ser emocional. No tem nada a ver com o sentido muito diferente e mais amplo em que as mulheres so mais emocionais: se guiam mais por feeling que por lgica"
X Link 2026-02-14T11:57Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Quer dizer que se eu for assaltado e em vez de matar o ladro matar o meu vizinho ningum seria RACIONAL de pergurtar: u Se era pra matar por que no matou o ladro ia aparecer voc dizendo mas no era pra matar ningum COMO SE ALGUM ESTIVESSE DISCORDANDO DISSO"
X Link 2026-02-14T12:20Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc Vc est fingindo no entender. Pegue todas as pessoas que CONCORDAM 100% que idealmente no pra matar ningum (incluindo eu e a pessoa do post em questo): AINDA RACIONAL perguntar porque um assassino escolheu matar quem NO o prejudicou em vez de quem o prejudicou"
X Link 2026-02-14T12:37Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc J falei que concordo 100% que no se deveria matar ningum em nenhum dos casos o que j era bvio desde o post original mas voc PRECISA dessa confuso a todo custo. Por qu o assassino matou quem no tinha nada a ver AARGH NO SE DEVE MATAAAR NINGUM QI [--] pqp"
X Link 2026-02-14T13:09Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Lua_aluan @larireidelas @krlhdc As duas coisas so verdade: no deveria ter morte e j que TEVE morte ESTRANHO que a pessoa vitimada no seja quem prejudicou o assassino e RACIONAL perceber essa estranheza. Voc insistir que uma coisa exclui a outra s teimosia mesmo pra no dizer coisa pior"
X Link 2026-02-14T13:38Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@_MorriganLefayy @maluizalvs @cuhorin90109 Isso a sim pseudocincia. Psicanlise no tem a menor base causal ou confirmao emprica. E s de voc sugerir que uma afirmao FACTUAL sobre a natureza masculina justificativa pra violncia j mostra que no compreende lgica bsica: descrio no implica prescrio"
X Link 2026-02-14T14:31Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@AuContraire9 @Philip_Goff There are a ton of anti-metaphysical takes either properly philosophical or just naively ideological (like scientism) but a minimal success of metaphysics that an objective reality can clearly be inferred from our shared subjective experiences shouldnt really be disputed"
X Link 2026-02-15T04:58Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@JanaDahoui @longshott Voc parou pra avisar os policiais enquanto simultaneamente batendo foto deles e os filmando 🤔"
X Link 2026-02-15T10:02Z [--] followers, [----] engagements

"@S2jurupinga @larireidelas @krlhdc Ta uma explicao razovel e racional pra atitude do assassino que obviamente no dizer que o ato dele foi justificado embora todos os asnos que comentaram aqui tendem a interpretar exatamente assim (pelo menos quando QUEREM pra poder lacrar)"
X Link 2026-02-15T12:14Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@TezzaLap @mattwridley They might be or not. Depends on a bunch of other assumptions. But whatever is the physical cause of subjectivity the mystery is the same. Say its your kind of complexity: its still as if magic that such complexity is suddenly accompanied by subjectivity. 1/2"
X Link 2026-02-15T12:58Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Observable just means SOMETHING produces the subjective experiences we get in 1st person. Science is literally based on the shared experiences themselves NOT in whatever reality is causing it: THAT cant be empirical. Only inference and reasoning (philosophy) can get there"
X Link 2026-02-15T04:54Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff We are talking past each other: terms like math and physics name both the theory (the map) and the object of the theory (what the map describes). Math the theory is about quantities and spatial relations in the abstract: those are not empirical. Nor invented. We do 1/2"
X Link 2026-02-16T01:28Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff create the theories and the maps BY discovering (not inventing) the objective facts they are about whether that knowledge is empirical or a priori. The classic divide about math is whether its discovered or invented in that sense. Chess is invented math is not. 2/2"
X Link 2026-02-16T01:29Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@grok @immy_jpeg @MC34197342 @frankmugisha Ok I stand corrected then. Homosexuality IS natural in that sense. Still an irrelevant truth against religious-based indictment of homosexuality as I already argued"
X Link 2026-02-17T01:40Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@jkoomunista @larireidelas @krlhdc ENTRE matar um inocente e matar cinco inocentes o q menos pior Na sua cabea luntica essa pergunta tem resposta porque O MENOS PIOR MATAR ZERO PESSOAS como se ISSO q ningum discorda tivesse a ver com a pergunta feita. Ainda alucina defesa de feminicdio pqp"
X Link 2026-02-14T22:59Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@jkoomunista @larireidelas @krlhdc Sua cabea que t contaminada pelo moralismo e no consegue mais pensar logicamente. INCAPAZ de dizer o BVIO: melhor mesmo matar [--] inocentes mas ENTRE matar [--] e [--] inocentes matar s [--] o menos pior. E eu sou o burro. 😅😅😅"
X Link 2026-02-15T01:31Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Theoretical physics isnt modern math lmfao: its intended to match the empirical data and correctly thrown out when it fails to do so. But if empirical data contravenes pure math like delivering [--] as prime or circles where pi = [--] then its for sure wrong"
X Link 2026-02-16T01:34Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Theoretical physics is applied math which just includes contingent (observed) quantitative facts that couldnt be proved independently of empirical data unlike actual pure math. SURELY you get my point. OBVIOUSLY applied math is empirical. That says nothing about pure math"
X Link 2026-02-16T01:56Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@this_is_easy @Smiley_Gate @Philip_Goff Im no platonist believing math facts somehow EXIST ABSTRACTLY but I do think mathematical truths are objectively true anyway being about abstract facts: structural facts that arent grounded in existence. Kinda like past facts: the past doesnt exist ANYMORE. Still objective"
X Link 2026-02-16T02:01Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@immy_jpeg @MC34197342 @frankmugisha @grok The way I read it and christians do think that way it is a sin against God is meant to be the reason WHY homo is unnatural not a separate claim. So in their sense it can be like a disease: it does happen naturally (in YOUR sense not theirs) but you better fix it"
X Link 2026-02-17T01:59Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing

@AxisLuti
/creator/twitter::AxisLuti