[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

$nbh

Legal battles intensify as $NBH is central to the Kelly v. FINRA case, with significant legal fees being spent to halt proceedings. Recent filings show FINRA opposing Kelly's request for a sur-reply, indicating a continued back-and-forth in the ongoing legal dispute.

About $nbh

$nbh refers to a cryptocurrency project and its associated ecosystem.

Insights

Engagements: XXXXX (24h)

Engagements Line Chart
Engagements 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: XXXXX
Daily Average: XXXXX
X Week: XXXXX -XX%
X Month: XXXXXX -XX%
X Months: XXXXXXX +240%
X Year: XXXXXXX +199%
1-Year High: XXXXXX on 2025-08-13
1-Year Low: X on 2025-03-20

Engagements by network (24h): TikTok: X X: XXXXX

Mentions: XX (24h)

Mentions Line Chart
Mentions 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: XX
Daily Average: XX
X Week: XX +24%
X Month: XX -XX%
X Months: XXXXX +813%
X Year: XXXXX +334%
1-Year High: XXX on 2025-06-28
1-Year Low: X on 2025-01-28

Mentions by network (24h): TikTok: X X: XX

Creators: X (24h)

Creators Line Chart
Creators 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $nbh in the last XX hours which is up XXX% from X in the previous XX hours Daily Average: X
X Week: XX +11%
X Month: XX +4%
X Months: XXX +2,064%
X Year: XXX +898%
1-Year High: XXX on 2025-06-28
1-Year Low: X on 2024-12-25

The most influential creators that mention $nbh in the last XX hours

Creator Rank Followers Posts Engagements
@kimkep4796 X XXXXX X XXX
@808CG1 X XXXXX X X

View More

Sentiment: XX%

Sentiment Line Chart
Sentiment 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: XX%
Daily Average: XX%
X Week: XX% -XX%
X Month: XX% -XX%
X Months: XX% no change
X Year: XX% +30%
1-Year High: XXX% on 2024-12-18
1-Year Low: XX% on 2025-11-03

Most Supportive Themes:

Most Critical Themes:

Top $nbh Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.

"๐Ÿšจ $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH FINRA isnt fighting William Kelly alone theyve hired very expensive lawyers to stop this case. ๐Ÿ’ผ Faegre Drinker (BigLaw) Partner John Mitchell: $950$1150/hr Firm blended rate: $650$950/hr ๐Ÿ’ผ EPG Law Group (Local Counsel) Elias George: $425$575/hr ๐Ÿ’ฐ Estimated payout to FINRAs law firms: $200k$500k if dismissed early $600k$1.8M if discovery opens $3M+ if it reaches trial โžก FINRA is spending seven figures to stop this case from moving forward. โžก Retail isnt the only one with something at stake here. #KellyvFINRA #FINRA #SROs #TransparencyNow"
X Link @kimkep4796 2025-12-11T23:25Z 2367 followers, XXX engagements

"We did it guys We finally got the share count Wait I thought it was only 165M Oh wait that was before three years of quiet dilution Yep. We got 100M more in the boat now. Better row harder"
X Link @Outlier_999 2025-12-11T21:39Z XXX followers, 2217 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH Filed 12/11/25 โš–William Lee Kelly v FINRA The volleying back & forth continues๐ŸŽพ FINRA just filed an opposition to Kellys request to file a sur-reply. ๐Ÿ”น FINRA says sur-replies are highly discouraged ๐Ÿ”น Claims they didnt raise any new arguments ๐Ÿ”น Says the 1-for-1 NBH distribution + FINRA rules were already cited ๐Ÿ”น Adds Kelly doesnt dispute the rules they want judicially noticed ๐Ÿ”น Argues Rule 11(b)(3) reminder wasnt new just a warning ๐Ÿ’ฅ FINRAs bottom line: Kellys motion has no merit and should be denied. ๐ŸŽพ And the volley continues"
X Link @kimkep4796 2025-12-11T21:22Z 2367 followers, 2901 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH WILLIAM LEE KELLY V FINRA 12/05/2025 What FINRA Just Told the Court ๐Ÿ‘€โš–๐Ÿ”ฅ Laymans terms breakdown of FINRAs latest filing (Doc 57): ๐Ÿ’ฅ What FINRA Is Doing FINRA just filed a reply telling the judge: Kellys objections dont matter accept ALL our documents as facts. ๐Ÿ“Œ Key Points (Simple Terms) ๐Ÿ”น FINRA Point #1 The 1-for-1 NBH Distribution Is Not Up for Debate FINRA wants the court to judicially notice (officially recognize) a Next Bridge press release saying MMTLP holders got X NBH share for each MMTLP share on 12/14/24. Kelly argued the distribution is disputed. FINRA"
X Link @kimkep4796 2025-12-08T22:28Z 2369 followers, 3651 engagements