[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
A critical post targeting multiple projects, including $lapeanuts, has garnered significant engagement, raising concerns about project legitimacy and past performance.
$lapeanuts refers to the social media presence and community surrounding the LaPeanuts project.
Engagements 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: XX
X Week: XX -XX%
1-Year High: XX on 2025-12-09
1-Year Low: XX on 2025-12-04
Engagements by network (24h): X: X
Mentions 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
X Week: X no change
1-Year High: X on 2025-12-03
1-Year Low: X on 2025-12-03
Mentions by network (24h): X: X
Creators 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $lapeanuts in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
X Week: X no change
1-Year High: X on 2025-12-03
1-Year Low: X on 2025-12-03
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"Sorry to say Every project you(clique)'ve touched has been a complete shitshow. For example: $LA(peanuts most ineligible) $CAMP (peanuts most ineligible) $EDGEN (claiming fee+ their NFT mint fee was their peanuts Airdrops) $RISE (peanuts most ineligible) $SOMI (decent drop but don't actually know about this) $IRYS (peanuts heavily Sybilled by team) $RAYLS (peanuts heavily Sybilled) $TEN (no comments 🤡) And the list continues. I didn't mention the list from 2024 Otherwise it will go even further 🤡"
X Link @0ximgmi 2025-12-03T11:49Z XXX followers, XXX engagements