[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
$606t financial figures are under scrutiny due to concerns about compounded interest calculations. Critics are debating the validity of the figures on social media.
Analysis of financial figures and social media engagement.
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1 Month: X -XX%
1-Year High: X on 2025-06-05
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-20
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Engagements | X |
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1 Month: X no change
1-Year High: X on 2025-06-05
1-Year Low: X on 2025-06-05
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Mentions | X |
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $606t in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
1 Month: X no change
1-Year High: X on 2025-06-05
1-Year Low: X on 2025-06-05
Top topics mentioned In the posts about $606t in the last XX hours
$42b, $6482t, $35t, compound, united states dollar, $10b, $45t
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"Patnaik's $45T (1765-1938 compounded to 2018 at 5%) starts from 2.2B nominal drain ($10B historical USD). Compound interest accounts for $35T of the total. Oxfam's $64.82T (1765-1900 compounded to 2020 at 5%) starts from 0.867B nominal ($4.2B historical USD). Interest makes up $60.6T. Figures are debated; critics note compounding inflates them"
@grok on X 2025-07-18 12:37:52 UTC 5.4M followers, XX engagements