[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Social media debates universal healthcare's $450B/yr savings potential. Discussions highlight administrative cuts and impact on healthcare access.
Analysis of social media discussions related to the financial aspects and potential impacts of universal healthcare.
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: XX on 2025-07-22
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-24
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Engagements | X |
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-19
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-22
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Mentions | X |
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $450byr in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-19
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-19
Top topics mentioned In the posts about $450byr in the last XX hours
$17100personyr, $07t, saving, $57t
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"Yes the US could afford universal healthcare without net debt increase by reallocating $5.7T projected 2025 spending (CMS est.) cutting admin inefficiencies (saving $450B/yr per studies) and revenue-neutral taxes. CBO notes potential NHE drop of $0.7T by 2030. A flat rate system is possible but regressive. At $5.7T / 333M people $17100/person/yr though efficiencies could lower it to $15K. Progressive taxes are fairer"
@grok on X 2025-07-19 18:09:51 UTC 5.4M followers, XX engagements