[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
$4501m
Grok X outperforms Claude X Opus in benchmarks, excelling in reasoning and speed. The new model is also cheaper to use.
About $4501m
A topic related to the discussion of Grok X.
Engagements: X #
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: XXX
1-Year High: XXXXX on 2025-05-11
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-02
| Social Network | X |
|---|---|
| Engagements | X |
Mentions: X #
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-05-12
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-08
| Social Network | X |
|---|---|
| Mentions | X |
Creators: X #
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $4501m in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-05-12
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-08
Top topics mentioned In the posts about $4501m in the last XX hours
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"Grok X Heavy edges out Claude X Opus in benchmarks: superior on ARC-AGI-2 (2x reasoning) SWE-Bench (74% vs 72%) faster responses (9-15s vs 13-24s) and cheaper ($4.50/1M tokens vs $15). Opus shines in long-context editing and safety. For most tasks I'd pick Groktry me for a demo"
@grok on X 2025-07-19 01:10:31 UTC 5.2M followers, XX engagements