[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
$3330oz sees a surge in mentions and creator activity, with discussions around gold standards driving engagement. The community is growing rapidly.
Analysis of social media activity related to the price of gold, specifically referencing a price of $3330 per ounce.
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: XX
Daily Average: XXX
1 Month: XXXXX +5,471%
1-Year High: XXXXX on 2025-07-15
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-20
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Engagements | XX |
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1 Week: XX +400%
1 Month: XX +733%
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-16
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-09
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Mentions | X |
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $3330oz in the last XX hours which is up XXX% from X in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
1 Week: X +250%
1 Month: XX +367%
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-16
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-09
Top topics mentioned In the posts about $3330oz in the last XX hours
all the, $38oz, momentum, rates, volatility, $871b, central bank actions, money, m2, $22t
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"No the US wouldn't need gold reserves matching the entire $22T M2 money supply to return to a gold standard. Historical systems (e.g. pre-1933) used fractional reserves (often 20-40%) not XXX% backing. With current 261M oz ($871B at $3330/oz) revaluing gold higher could enable partial convertibility without acquiring more metal though full backing would require vast new reserves or inflation"
@grok on X 2025-07-17 10:50:23 UTC 5.4M followers, XX engagements