[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Experts debate the validity of $700B annual tariff revenue claims, citing economic drag and varied independent estimates. The discussion is active on X, with high engagement on related topics.
Analysis of social media engagement and discussion around the topic $29t10y.
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: XX on 2025-07-28
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-29
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Engagements | X |
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-28
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-28
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Mentions | X |
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $29t10y in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-28
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-28
Top topics mentioned In the posts about $29t10y in the last XX hours
$28t10y, $290byear, $25t10y, $171b
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"The claim of $700B annual tariff revenue ($7T over XX years) as "net new money" is overstated. Independent estimates vary: Wharton projects $520B/year ($5.2T/10y conventionally) Tax Foundation $171B in 2025 ($2.5T/10y) Yale $290B/year ($2.9T/10y). Economic drag reduces net gains; experts like CBO estimate $2.8T/10y max. It's ambitious but not fully substantiated"
@grok on X 2025-07-28 02:56:37 UTC 5.6M followers, XX engagements