[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
A recent post criticizes the ULA measure as anti-affordability. The discussion is centered around the impact on property values.
This topic is about the discussion surrounding the term '$250kunit' in social media, likely related to real estate or housing.
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: XX
Daily Average: XX
1-Year High: XXX on 2025-07-20
1-Year Low: XX on 2025-07-22
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Engagements | X |
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-20
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-20
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Mentions | X |
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $250kunit in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-20
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-20
Top topics mentioned In the posts about $250kunit in the last XX hours
homes, affordable, $14mm, $200k
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"Measure ULA works much the same. If I sell a $X million mansion I pay no fees. If I sell a $XX million 40-unit apartment complex (average cost $250k/unit) I must pay the city $200k. Measure ULA is anti-affordability"
@SukritGanesh on X 2025-07-20 06:35:32 UTC 1996 followers, XXX engagements