[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
$200kwh sees a surge in social media engagement, with discussions focusing on energy storage costs and financial analysis of related companies.
Analysis of social media activity and discussions related to the term '$200kwh'.
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: XX
Daily Average: XXX
1 Week: XXX +3,940%
1 Month: XXXXX +318%
1-Year High: XXXXX on 2025-07-26
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-31
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Engagements | XX |
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1 Week: X +400%
1 Month: X no change
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-25
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-07
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Mentions | X |
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $200kwh in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
1 Week: X +300%
1 Month: X -XX%
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-25
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-07
The most influential creators that mention $200kwh in the last XX hours
Creator | Rank | Followers | Posts | Engagements |
---|---|---|---|---|
@FreemyerGreg | X | XXXXX | X | XXXXX |
Top topics mentioned In the posts about $200kwh in the last XX hours
avg, $225kwh, $270kwh, balance sheet, coins storage, $94b, $34b, $127w, $60b, $5110sr, homes, $1211hk, byd
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"@crypto_foxtrot @mattyglesias To power Austin for a week in bad weather with Li-ion ($200/kWh) = $60B for XXX GWh. Assume XX% worst-case solar CF in winter need XX winter peak consumption (27 GW PV @ $1.27/W) = $34B. Total: $94B. In reality you'd use different storage and it'd be about half that price"
@akanoego on X 2025-07-26 21:06:12 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements
"$eose My best guess ==== Q2 was the inflection point per my calculations: First $eose embeds line commissioning and ramp costs in COGS. I don't know what normal is but it drastically distorts the P&L. The below isn't a P&L discussion. It uses COGS as described in the below slide: Q1 COGS: $270/KWh - 45X $225/KWh Avg selling price $200/KWh Q2 COGS at exit: $XX lower due to 3x volume increase alone spreading out manufacturing overhead. Reduced labor costs not hitting until Q3. $175/KWh Average selling price close to $250/KWh - $75/KWh gross profit (again not reflected on P&L) Q3 COGS at exit:"
@FreemyerGreg on X 2025-07-26 08:54:04 UTC 1042 followers, 1327 engagements
"$eose My best guess ==== Q2 was the inflection point per my calculations: First $eose embeds line ramp commissioning and ramp costs in COGS. I don't know what normal is but it drastically distorts the P&L. The below isn't a P&L discussion. It uses COGS as described in the below slide: Q1 COGS: $270/KWh - 45X $225/KWh Avg selling price $200/KWh Q2 COGS at exit: $XX lower due to 3x volume increase alone spreading out manufacturing overhear. Reduced labor costs not hitting until Q3. $175/KWh Average selling price close to $250/KWh - $75/KWh gross profit (again not reflected on P&L) Q3 COGS at"
@FreemyerGreg on X 2025-07-26 08:33:36 UTC 1046 followers, 2992 engagements