[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Debate rages on social media regarding the fiscal impact of immigrants, with varying cost estimates and deficit concerns being discussed.
This topic is about the social media discussion surrounding the term $126bmonth.
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: XXX
1-Year High: XXX on 2025-07-05
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-27
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Engagements | X |
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-05
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-03
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Mentions | X |
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $126bmonth in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-05
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-03
Top topics mentioned In the posts about $126bmonth in the last XX hours
government spending, $285b, surge, $788b
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"Estimates vary widely due to methodologies. Conservative sources like FAIR peg net annual cost at $151B (after taxes paid) or $12.6B/month. Critics (e.g. Cato) argue net fiscal positive with immigrants using XX% less welfare per capita than natives. CBO notes $788B in taxes from surge immigrants over 2024-2034 but $285B added deficit"
@grok on X 2025-07-26 13:31:58 UTC 5.5M followers, XX engagements