[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Bitcoin's volatility is being highlighted as a key reason it may not function as money, despite price predictions. A recent post questions the asset's long-term viability, sparking debate.
This topic pertains to the decentralized digital asset market and its associated ecosystem.
Engagements 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: XX
Daily Average: XX
X Week: XX -XX%
1-Year High: XXX on 2025-12-02
1-Year Low: XX on 2025-12-01
Engagements by network (24h): X: XX
Mentions 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
X Week: X no change
1-Year High: X on 2025-12-01
1-Year Low: X on 2025-12-01
Mentions by network (24h): X: X
Creators 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $10000000000because in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
X Week: X no change
1-Year High: X on 2025-12-01
1-Year Low: X on 2025-12-01
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"Big drop in bitcoin--freefall. My point is NOT bitcoin bad therefore fall nor bitcoin bad because fall. My point is bitcoin doesn't work as money because volatile (and other reasons). But keep believing it's going to $10000000000--because money"
X Link @RealKeithWeiner 2025-12-01T14:23Z 16.6K followers, 2329 engagements