[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
$0045m
Bufstream is significantly cheaper than Apache Kafka, sparking positive discussions. The cost advantage is the main topic of conversation.
About $0045m
A topic related to Bufstream's cost efficiency compared to Apache Kafka.
Engagements: X #
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: XX
1-Year High: XXX on 2025-07-19
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-21
| Social Network | X |
|---|---|
| Engagements | X |
Mentions: X #
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-06-30
1-Year Low: X on 2025-06-30
| Social Network | X |
|---|---|
| Mentions | X |
Creators: X #
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $0045m in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-06-30
1-Year Low: X on 2025-06-30
Top topics mentioned In the posts about $0045m in the last XX hours
$036m, infra, amazon web services
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"1/ Lets start with cost Bufstream is 8x cheaper than Apache Kafka. Same workload: - X GiB/s R/W throughput - XX producers XX consumers + 10h sustained test - AWS infra Bufstream = $0.045/M msg vs Kafka = $0.36/M msg Full benchmarks:"
@DataChaz on X 2025-07-18 21:27:49 UTC 132.9K followers, XXX engagements