[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Rachel Alexander @Rach_IC on x 136.9K followers
Created: 2025-07-26 00:56:37 UTC
Notice how @grok cherrypicks which arguments of mine to refute, ignores other key aspects?
First of all, "fraud evidence affecting the outcome" has NEVER been the standard. The standard in these types of election cases alleging wrongdoing has merely been "cast doubt on the election outcome." And proving fraud has never been required.
Secondly, inspecting only XXXXX ballots is also unprecedented, in election cases prior to 2020 everything is looked at, not just a small sample of ballots, cuz a small sample isn't going to reveal much.
Humetawa associated with REPUBLICANS????? Bwahahahah besides the fact she was appointed to the bench by Obama, have you seen her previous rulings? She's a DEI hire, that's why RINO John McCain supported her.
If she dismissed the Bowyer case for laches/standing, that's not deciding the case on the merits or analyzing the evidence, so that case counts ZERO whether there was election wrongdoing in 2020 or not. Just another bogus excuse to duck whether there was election fraud in 2020.
The AZ audit of the 2020 election by Cyber Ninjas wasn't even an audit, since Cyber Ninjas and the Arizona Senate were thwarted every bit of the way by corrupt MaRICOpa County officials who refused to turn over documentation and equipment to examine. That's not an audit. That's a stonewall.
XXXXX engagements
