[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Akh1l @akh1l_sol on x 6083 followers
Created: 2025-07-25 17:08:51 UTC
It started like that but Pump showed us there were no different. If anything all they did was make the rug process easier. Until bubble maps came about it was literally same wallets that created tokens and pulled liqudity, but instead bundling on pumpfun.
Agree on the point about bonkfun. They paid loads of KOLs/traders to talk about bonk tokens BUT is no different to Pump now and 'creators'. Pump tried to even sign up Frank DeGods.
People forget the Bonk ECs gave themselves up to tens of thousands a day each with X transparency around who or how much. The not selling SOL is good marketing. They stake it on their own validator which makes them more SOL which they could easily sell without directly selling the revenue made.
At the same time they gave loads back to Solana where as Alon has given back X. If anything Alon is the reason why pumpfun share of market is going down.
Only difference is pump chose the worst representatives they could where as Bonk went with people with more credibility.
Simply put, who would you rather trust on a token, the based house or Bluntz and Bonk guy. Easy choice all day
XX engagements
Related Topics bonkfun coins wallets bubble pumpfun coins solana ecosystem coins meme coins pump fun