[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@nxt888 Avatar @nxt888 Sony Thăng

Sony Thăng posts on X about $6758t, china, history, united states the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence technology brands #812 countries #959 finance XXXX% travel destinations #4568 social networks X% celebrities XXXX%

Social topic influence $6758t #26, china #1644, history #93, united states #258, cambodia #22, the world #1195, venezuela #30, japan #1111, if you #3067, iraq #18

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @avoice12456423 @cepheustalks @timtears @daysgone_1 @mcewenisabelle @victorywiilcome @memeconstabie @topgundy @fedelmayer @dracaaiko @zahraflower09 @medellin_topo @grok @apexalphatrader @freedm_dj @saeeddoroudiani @stonewalltitlow @marlenstarr2 @ss1123469 @rositastellar

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"History is not the problem. Selective memory is. You are right that the Caribbean once stood on the edge of a new world. You are right that Jamaica Trinidad and Tobago and Cuba imagined a future free from the empire next door. You are right that Washington responded not with diplomacy but with sabotage assassination plots economic strangulation and the Bay of Pigs. But here is the part that matters now: What failed in 1961 did not fail because the idea was wrong. It failed because the world was unipolar. It failed because one empire had the power to make entire regions kneel. That world no"
X Link 2025-12-04T04:33Z 95.8K followers, 52.1K engagements

"How do you turn a billion people into a security threat You show them only in mugshots and body counts. You airlift Israeli talking points to every newsroom And call it journalism. You criminalize a language a scarf a prayer And call it "integration." You do not fight terror. You manufacture it. You market it. You need it"
X Link 2025-12-15T07:40Z 95.8K followers, 14.4K engagements

"Israel didnt invent genocide. It perfected Americas version of it. It learned from the trail of bones across the plains From Hiroshimas shadow From the napalmed jungles of Vietnam. The same moral anesthesia. The same language of "defense." The same cameras turned away at the moment of truth. Gaza is not a tragedy. It is a reflection"
X Link 2025-12-16T15:38Z 95.8K followers, 9436 engagements

"You cant drop two atomic bombs on civilians Napalm children in Vietnam Carpet-bomb Laos and Cambodia Arm genocides from Indonesia to Gaza Invade Iraq on lies And still lecture the world about human rights. Unless you are America. Then hypocrisy becomes foreign policy"
X Link 2025-12-17T10:45Z 95.8K followers, 142.3K engagements

"American sweat did not create Venezuelan oil. Geology did. Venezuelan soil did. Venezuelan workers did. What your sentence really says is this: "When our corporations sink pipes into your land the oil becomes ours. If you take it back you are a thief." You call nationalization "the largest recorded theft of American wealth and property." But what exactly was "American" about it The land wasnt American. The reserves werent American. The country wasnt American. What you had were contracts signed in a hierarchy of power that let U.S. companies skim enormous profits off another nations resources."
X Link 2025-12-17T14:50Z 95.8K followers, 68.5K engagements

"You are repeating a claim that collapses the moment you introduce a timeline longer than a tweet. Venezuela did not begin "failing" in 2013 because of socialism. Venezuela began suffocating the moment it tried to take control of an oil system that had been run for decades as a private annex of Washington. 2013 was not the beginning of Venezuela's crisis. It was the beginning of the oil price crash. A crash triggered by Saudi overproduction and welcomed in Washington because it weakened Russia Iran and every oil dependent economy on the planet. Not just Venezuela. Mexico's peso collapsed."
X Link 2025-12-02T11:59Z 95K followers, 168.4K engagements

"If Ukrainians were fighting for independence they would not be dying under NATO strategy NATO weapons and NATO vetoes on negotiations. You cannot fight for independence under the command of someone elses geopolitical script. Look at the record. When Ukraine tried to negotiate neutrality in 2022 the West stopped it. When Ukraine asked for guarantees of security the West demanded escalation. When Ukraine voted for Zelensky on a peace platform the West pushed him into war. Where is the independence in that Real independence would have meant refusing to be a proxy. What they have is the opposite:"
X Link 2025-12-05T07:24Z 94.9K followers, 8967 engagements

"If you want to ask "on what basis" Russia can redraw borders start by asking the only question that matters: On what basis did NATO rewrite the security architecture of Eastern Europe without Russias consent Because borders do not change in a vacuum. They change when someone tries to change the balance around them. Ukraine did not become "a sovereign country invaded out of nowhere." Ukraine became the frontline of a military bloc that spent XX years moving toward Russias borders while ignoring every warning Russia ever gave. You call it "annexation." Russia calls it what every major power"
X Link 2025-12-06T15:34Z 95.1K followers, 17K engagements

"The average person doesnt believe in the tooth fairy. But millions believe NATO is a peace organization"
X Link 2025-12-06T18:31Z 94.8K followers, 35K engagements

"You keep trying to rescue capitalism with a philosophical trick: Pretend that when capitalist policies cause mass death it is an "abstraction" but when socialist policies cause mass death it is "inevitable." That double standard collapses the moment history enters the room. Collectivization can create shortages. Extraction does too. The difference is scale intention and power. But your claim that Ireland and India starved because they "failed to industrialize" reveals the core problem with your argument: You are blaming the victims for disasters engineered by the system that prevented them"
X Link 2025-12-07T05:00Z 95K followers, 5211 engagements

"You are now running in circles because the distinction you are trying to defend is not real. You say industrialization is "a product of free exchange." It is not. Industrialization in the West was built through enclosure dispossession colonial plunder slavery and state-backed violence. None of that is free exchange. All of it is coerced extraction. Britain did not industrialize because it traded freely. Britain industrialized because it stole freely. Your model of development is mythology not economics. Then you say centralized control "feeds fewer people." But modern capitalism has never fed"
X Link 2025-12-07T05:30Z 95K followers, 6716 engagements

"If you have to call someone a robot to avoid answering the argument you have already conceded it. Let me simplify what you stumbled over. When I said China is "between two Western ideologies" I was referring to the Western definitions of socialism and capitalism. Definitions built for Western histories Western conditions and Western failures. When I said China "sits above them" I meant exactly this: China does not follow Western socialism. China does not follow Western capitalism. China follows a system designed for Chinese realities Chinese history and Chinese statecraft. Your contradiction"
X Link 2025-12-08T04:39Z 95K followers, 6720 engagements

"If you had an actual counterargument you would present it. Instead you pretend not to understand the word "above" so you can avoid the reality it points to. So let me remove the metaphor and give you the metric you claim to want: A system is above others when it outperforms both while relying on neither. China: Did not adopt Western capitalism. Did not maintain Soviet-style socialism. Did not collapse like the USSR. Did not stagnate like neoliberal Europe. Did not financialize itself into crisis like the US. Did not surrender its economy to foreign capital like Latin America. Did not lose"
X Link 2025-12-08T05:02Z 95K followers, 6697 engagements

"You are repeating a Western slogan in a context where it does not apply. If China were just "elites winning while the proletariat suffers" then explain the one thing no Western capitalist state has ever achieved: A working class whose living standards wages housing healthcare education life expectancy and social mobility all rose faster than any population in human history. Chinas proletariat did not watch the wealth go upward. They moved with it. This is not theory. It is measurable reality. In the West inequality grows. In China inequality shrinks. In the West wages stagnate. In China wages"
X Link 2025-12-08T05:36Z 95K followers, 8809 engagements

"DMITRY MEDVEDEV: "The Americans keep trying to tame the deranged animal that is the European Union. Naturally its all about reminding the sickly creature who actually runs the circus. Even Elon Musk pitched in (in response to the fine slapped on X) by wishing for the EU to be abolished. Not bad Works out pretty well for us. Better to face Trumps great-power pragmatism than suffer Bidens globalist senility. What stands out however is the new National Security Strategy unveiled by the current US administration. Its notable for offering a realistic assessment of todays challenges. A short"
X Link 2025-12-08T06:59Z 95K followers, 5026 engagements

"Message posted by Dmitry Medvedev Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation on his Telegram channel December X 2025. Source:"
X Link 2025-12-08T06:59Z 94.9K followers, 3010 engagements

"What Americans call "capitalism" is really a risk-free aristocracy sitting on top of a risk-soaked population. The elites get infinite upside with guaranteed rescue. The workers get infinite downside with guaranteed blame. That is not a market. That is not meritocracy. That is not freedom. It is a wealth-transfer machine disguised as ideology. They privatize profit nationalize loss and then sermonize about "personal responsibility." They build a system where: Billionaires gamble with other peoples futures. Politicians insure the rich against the consequences of their own decisions. The public"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:23Z 95K followers, 11.5K engagements

"The West loves counting Asian corpses As long as none of them link back to the IMF To opium gunboats To French Indochina To American napalm To British famines To Japanese imperialism armed with Western loans. History is not the story they tell. Its the crimes they hide"
X Link 2025-12-09T11:22Z 95K followers, 9359 engagements

"That is exactly it Comrade. What upsets me is when people talk about Vietnam "invading" Cambodia or invent some fantasy about a Vietnamese plan to build an "Indochina empire." As if we were sitting around bored looking for territory. They have no idea what Vietnam looked like in 1978. A country bombed to the Stone Age. A nation burying three million of its own dead. A people just emerging from a generation of colonialism carpet bombing chemical warfare famine and total devastation rebuilding from ruins while still fighting off raids starvation and sabotage on every border. The last thing"
X Link 2025-12-09T15:19Z 95K followers, 9402 engagements

"I understand that feeling. Anyone who has walked through Tuol Sleng or Choeung Ek carries a permanent weight afterward. No one with a conscience can stand in those places and come out unchanged. But here is what I always remind people especially comrades who feel "ashamed" of what Pol Pot did: Pol Pot was not the product of Marxism. Pol Pot was the product of Cambodias isolation the Cold War great-power interference and a leadership that abandoned every communist principle in favor of chauvinism paranoia and blood purity. Nothing about the Khmer Rouge resembled the communism Vietnam fought"
X Link 2025-12-09T15:35Z 95K followers, 6861 engagements

"Your little flag chart is the kind of thing people post when they do not understand the difference between geopolitics and genocide. You talk as if alliances explained anything. They do not. Vietnam did not march into Cambodia because Moscow nodded. Vietnam marched in because the Khmer Rouge were massacring Vietnamese civilians raiding Vietnamese villages and carrying out a genocide on Vietnams doorstep. The idea that Vietnam woke up one morning and thought "let us realign the international chessboard" is a Western fantasy imposed on a Southeast Asian tragedy. What Vietnam saw was simple. A"
X Link 2025-12-09T16:52Z 95K followers, 5374 engagements

"The issue isn't that citizens didn't protest. They did. They marched. They exposed. They resisted. The issue is that the empire learned from every backlash and became better at managing dissent than people became at confronting power. It learned how to drown truth in noise. It learned how to turn politics into entertainment. It learned how to replace journalism with narratives and teach citizens to mistake consumption for citizenship. That's why Disney Pixar DreamWorks Marvel all of it is soaked in the same mythology: America as hero. Violence as virtue. The world as a stage for American"
X Link 2025-12-10T19:07Z 95K followers, 5841 engagements

"Soft colonization is real. It does not arrive with soldiers. It arrives with stories. Stories that convince entire nations that America is the hero. Stories that turn violence into charity. Stories that disguise power as generosity. Stories that teach people to doubt their own history and trust the Hollywood version instead. For many the illusion only breaks when the mask slips. For you it happened during the pandemic. A moment when the richest country on earth showed the world who it really is. A nation that hoards medicine before it exists. A nation that treats human life as a commodity. A"
X Link 2025-12-10T19:22Z 95K followers, 16.7K engagements

"Nobody said the U.S. is the "only" cause of global crises. But denying its central role is its own kind of mythology. You dont get to invade countries topple governments arm dictators collapse economies through sanctions weaponize the IMF turn regions into proxy battlegrounds and then pretend migration happens in a vacuum. Millions flee for many reasons. But a staggering number flee from places the U.S. touched first. Central Americas caravans didnt appear by magic. Iraqis didnt flee because they were bored. Libyans werent drowning in the Mediterranean before 2011. Vietnamese didnt flee until"
X Link 2025-12-11T07:18Z 95K followers, 5247 engagements

"Studying in Paris did not make Pol Pot a Marxist any more than studying the Bible makes someone a saint. Pol Pot read Marx. He did not practice Marx. He practiced absolutism racial paranoia and agrarian primitivism. Anyone can cite Fanon or Sartre. What matters is what they built when they touched power. And the Khmer Rouge built nothing resembling socialism: They abolished industry. They emptied cities. They executed teachers doctors engineers. They banned medicine money schools and culture. They turned the entire nation into a forced-labor death camp. There is not a single Marxist or"
X Link 2025-12-11T08:04Z 95K followers, 7305 engagements

"America is not a land of truth tellers. It is a land of storytellers who forgot their stories were lies. The danger is not that Americans believe their myths. It is that they cannot survive without them"
X Link 2025-12-11T08:13Z 95.4K followers, 7733 engagements

""Common sense and personal grit" did not build America. Empire did. America's wealth did not come from hard working folks on Main Street. It came from stolen land enslaved labor foreign coups cheap colonial extraction and decades of printing dollars backed by military power. So when you talk about "the real heart of America" I need to ask: Who keeps sending those hard working folks to die in wars they never benefit from Who keeps stripping their unions their hospitals their pensions their towns Who keeps outsourcing their jobs and inflating their rent Who keeps feeding Wall Street while"
X Link 2025-12-11T09:00Z 95K followers, 10.1K engagements

"The irony is that you accuse me of "selective timing" while defending a narrative built entirely on it. You want to start the clock in 1945 because that is the only way the American story looks self generated. But history does not begin at the moment most convenient for those who inherit its benefits. The industrial base that made post 1945 growth possible was built on: Land taken by conquest. Capital accumulated from slavery. Labor imported through coercion. Resources extracted from abroad. Geopolitical dominance gained by two world wars the U.S. did not suffer on its own soil. You call this"
X Link 2025-12-11T19:02Z 95K followers, 7355 engagements

"I get the argument but its fifteen years outdated. Yes China used export-led growth as the engine of its rise. That was Phase One. But here is what people keep missing: China no longer depends on the West. The West depends on China. Look at the numbers: The majority of Chinas GDP now comes from domestic consumption not exports. The majority of Chinas exports go to the Global South not the U.S. or EU. Western companies are in China not out of charity but because leaving China is economic suicide. China is the largest trading partner of more than XXX countries. The U.S. and EU cannot build a"
X Link 2025-12-12T04:42Z 95K followers, 22.4K engagements

"The panic is the tell. When a system is confident it does not need daily headlines predicting collapse demographic doom or moral failure. It does not need propaganda to reassure itself. What you are watching is not analysis. It is anxiety. The West is losing its monopoly on power narrative and moral authority and it knows it. So it talks down competitors instead of fixing itself. Endless wars based on lies. Sanctions that starve civilians. Theft of foreign reserves. Plunder of foreign assets outright. Open support for genocide explained away with rhetoric. The mask is off. China does not need"
X Link 2025-12-12T05:11Z 95.4K followers, 10.9K engagements

"@jbonhamjr WW2 hid the collapse of European empire and transferred global power to the United States"
X Link 2025-12-14T17:44Z 94.9K followers, XX engagements

"You think Islam is the threat Look closer. The countries most bombed in the name of "security" are Muslim. The people most demonized in the name of "freedom" are Muslim. The religion most slandered in the name of "tolerance" is Islam. Maybe Islam isnt the problem. Maybe empire is"
X Link 2025-11-10T12:30Z 95.5K followers, 88.4K engagements

"You are shifting definitions again because you cannot defend the one you started with. You now say enclosure and industrialization are "not identical." Of course they are not identical. But they are inseparable. You do not get Watt's steam engine without the coal. You do not get the coal without dispossession. You do not get the factories without cheap labor. You do not get cheap labor without enclosure. Industrialization is not a list of inventions. It is a social transformation made possible by coercively restructuring land labor and markets. Your argument treats invention as if it floats"
X Link 2025-12-07T05:53Z 95.4K followers, 7947 engagements

"You are proving my point without realizing it. You say you "grew up knowing the truth." Good. But that only highlights the problem. Because if you knew the truth during Vietnam and the Civil Rights Movement Then you also know how many millions around you did not. You know how many believed the Gulf of Tonkin lie. You know how many cheered the bombing of my country. You know how many called Martin Luther King a traitor for opposing the war. You know how many trusted the FBI the CIA and the flag over the facts. You know how many Americans still think the U.S. "saved" Vietnam. You know how many"
X Link 2025-12-10T18:35Z 95.5K followers, 8322 engagements

"Thank you my friend. I speak this way precisely because I still believe people can change. If I had no hope in humanity there would be no point in speaking at all. Truth can be brutal yes. But it is also an invitation. An invitation to grow to unlearn to choose awareness over comfort. If anything I write gives people the feeling that they are not alone in that process then it is worth the discomfort that comes with it. That is where resistance begins"
X Link 2025-12-16T15:14Z 95.5K followers, XX engagements

"The real struggle today is not between nations. It is between narratives. Between a dying story that insists the world must obey one center of power and a rising story that says no civilization has the right to define the horizon for everyone else"
X Link 2025-12-07T10:15Z 95.7K followers, 5533 engagements

"If markets were the engine why did every country that copied Western capitalism collapse while the only one that kept the state in command surpassed the West What you call "Dengs reforms" were not a surrender to capitalism. They were capitalism put on a leash. Profits were allowed. But the land was not. Competition was allowed. But capital controls were not. Private firms were allowed. But strategic sectors were not. China opened the window. It never handed over the house. Every capitalist element you celebrate survives in China only because a socialist state prevents the market from"
X Link 2025-12-07T16:00Z 95.6K followers, 11.7K engagements

""All states are coercive monopolies." Sure Howie. And all fires are hot all oceans are wet and all empires swear they are necessary. You are not making a point. You are avoiding one. The question was never whether states use coercion. The question is: "Coercion for whom And for what" Capitalism uses coercion to protect property. Socialism uses coercion to protect people. Capitalism's coercion cages workers in debt extracts wealth upward privatizes life and calls it "freedom." Socialism's coercion breaks landlord power cracks oligarchic monopolies reclaims resources from foreign corporations"
X Link 2025-12-08T10:30Z 95.6K followers, 7788 engagements

"Michael thank you for saying what the United States has spent XX years trying to bury. Vietnam marched into Cambodia to stop a genocide. America helped the people committing it. That is the whole story in one line. Vietnam overthrew a fascist mass-murder regime liberated death camps and saved a nation from extinction. The United States put the Khmer Rouge in Cambodias UN seat. The United States armed them. The United States funded them. The United States defended them diplomatically even after the killing fields were undeniable. Washington did not stop the genocide. Washington prolonged it."
X Link 2025-12-09T14:32Z 95.6K followers, 24.7K engagements

"Ask why you fear certain nations. Did they harm you Or did someone else tell you to be afraid Ask why you defend certain wars. Did they protect you Or did they protect someones profit Fear is a leash. Cut it"
X Link 2025-12-10T07:23Z 95.7K followers, 5710 engagements

"The Khmer Rouge did not come to power because Cambodians suddenly embraced extremism. They came to power because the United States turned Cambodia into a secret bombing range. Between 1965 and 1973 the U.S. dropped more bombs on Cambodia than it dropped in the entire Pacific Theater of World War II. Villages were erased. Rural communities were shattered. Hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed. And into that cratered landscape walked Pol Pot. When people lose their homes their families their villages their entire world the extremists waiting in the shadows suddenly seem like the only"
X Link 2025-12-11T12:11Z 95.6K followers, 8153 engagements

"They said no one could stand against empire. But Vietnam did. And we didnt fight with words alone. We fought with steel in our spine and fire in our lungs. We fought barefoot in the mud with rusted rifles against superpowers who thought the world was theirs to rule. We made them bleed until they crawled back across oceansbeaten broken and no longer so sure of themselves. And we built what they said could never risea nation that never forgot the cost of freedom. Empire is not eternal. Resistance is"
X Link 2025-03-21T19:33Z 95.7K followers, 2.5M engagements

"They said Iraq was about weapons. It was about oil. They said Libya was about democracy. It was about oil. They said Venezuela is about drugs. Its about oil. The pattern isnt hard to see. Whats shocking is how many still pretend not to"
X Link 2025-10-29T07:52Z 95.7K followers, 1.7M engagements

"You are not describing history. You are describing the American bedtime story about history. Let me remind you what actually happened on our soil not in your textbooks. North Vietnam did not "invade" South Vietnam. Vietnam was one nation that foreign powers divided on paper and expected us to accept the way a prisoner accepts the shape of his cell. There is no "North Vietnamese people" and "South Vietnamese people." There is only one Vietnamese people separated by a imaginary line drawn by outsiders. You talk about 1954 as if the partition was destiny. It was not. The Geneva Accords mandated"
X Link 2025-12-02T06:43Z 95.8K followers, 1.1M engagements

"People think propaganda is about convincing you. It is not. Propaganda is about exhausting you until you no longer resist the frame. Once you accept their definitions Your conclusions become predictable Your emotions become programmable And your consent becomes automatic"
X Link 2025-12-05T10:44Z 95.7K followers, 122.7K engagements

"You are trying to hide behind a courtroom analogy because history is not on your side. But let us follow your metaphor. If "a crime is a crime" then the first question any honest judge asks is: Who is making the accusation and what is their record Italy may not have annexed anyone in XX years but it spent those XX years participating in every major Western intervention that violated sovereignty shattered borders and produced the same chaos you now claim to oppose. Italy helped bomb Yugoslavia without a UN mandate. Italy helped destroy Libya creating the migrant crisis it now complains about."
X Link 2025-12-05T17:48Z 95.8K followers, 18.2K engagements

"They will never say "Dont fight empire." Theyre not that foolish. Instead they say "Fight imperialism everywhere especially in China." "Fight tyranny everywhere especially in Russia." "Fight oppression just not the kind funded by Washington." "Fight authoritarianism but ignore the one with XXX bases." This is how the West survives the multipolar world: By convincing the colonized to sabotage their own future"
X Link 2025-12-06T11:52Z 95.7K followers, 48K engagements

"You keep repeating that NATO expansion was "the choice of individual countries" as if that magically erases the geopolitical consequences for everyone else. Choices have consequences. Especially when those choices move foreign armies to another great powers border. You want to pretend this is philosophy. It is not. It is physics. If Poland and the Baltics have the right to choose their security Then Russia has the right to choose its security in response. You simply refuse to accept Russias choice. That is the entire issue. You talk as if the map ends where your sympathies do. If NATO moves"
X Link 2025-12-06T17:20Z 95.7K followers, 10K engagements

"If socialism "siphons value" from capitalism then explain why capitalism keeps collapsing without socialist intervention. The Great Depression was not solved by markets. It was solved by public works regulation and state planning. 2008 was not saved by capitalism. It was saved by massive government bailouts and nationalized risk. COVID did not expose the strength of markets. It exposed that without state intervention millions more would have died and the economy would have imploded. If socialism is a parasite capitalism seems oddly dependent on its host. Your claim assumes socialism only"
X Link 2025-12-07T08:04Z 95.8K followers, 178.5K engagements

"You are trying to rescue capitalism by amputating its history. Fascism. Imperialism. Colonialism. Corporate expansion. Resource wars. Financial domination. Regime change. Structural adjustment. Global debt traps. You treat all of these as if they floated in space unconnected to the economic engine that produced them. They did not. Imperialism is not separate from capitalism. Imperialism is capitalism on the international stage. Capitalism inside one country requires endless growth. Endless growth requires new markets new labor new resources. When those do not exist at home they are taken"
X Link 2025-12-07T09:33Z 95.7K followers, 10.7K engagements

"You are trying to blame socialism for events that were created executed protected and prolonged entirely by capitalism. Let us start with 2008. The crash did not happen because the U.S. government helped people buy homes. It happened because Wall Street turned housing into a casino and sold toxic debt as investment-grade gold. Your governments crime was not socialism. It was obedience. It deregulated banks repealed safeguards and let private lenders gamble with the entire global economy. When the bubble burst capitalism did not take responsibility. It begged the state to save it. And it did."
X Link 2025-12-07T11:52Z 95.7K followers, 61.6K engagements

"The problem with your argument is not that it is wrong. It is that it is a Western myth that collapses the moment you look at what China actually did rather than what Western economists told you it did. Let us start with the core illusion: China did not abandon socialism. It refined it. China did not privatize land. It did not privatize its banks. It did not privatize its energy grid. It did not privatize its natural resources. It did not privatize its strategic industries. It did not privatize its currency. It did not privatize its capital controls. China introduced markets the same way a"
X Link 2025-12-07T14:11Z 95.7K followers, 93.2K engagements

"They call it the "land of the free." But every freedom is conditional. Free speech as long as you dont expose empire. Free press as long as you dont question Israel. Free markets as long as Wall Street always wins. Even freedom itself is fake just another export model wrapped around bombs"
X Link 2025-12-07T18:12Z 95.7K followers, 11.8K engagements

"America doesnt hate socialism. It hates shared socialism. It practices socialism every time a crisis hits. Just not for you. Taxpayer money rescues banks. Taxpayer money bails out corporations. Taxpayer money props up billionaires who privatize the profit and socialize the debt. The only thing America fears is the day the working class realizes theyve been funding luxury communism for the rich"
X Link 2025-12-07T18:39Z 95.7K followers, 80.3K engagements

"You know nothing Paul Snow. Calling socialism "built on force" is the oldest sleight of hand in Western political mythology. Because the entire global order that capitalism stands on was built through force so vast it covered continents. Capitalism did not spread through consent. It spread through colonization slavery enclosure occupation coups and corporate extraction backed by armies. If force disqualifies an economic system capitalism collapses before the conversation even begins. But let us take your argument seriously. You say socialism "never competes." Then why does capitalism spend"
X Link 2025-12-08T08:40Z 95.7K followers, 22.9K engagements

"Your entire argument rests on one mistake: You think the presence of formal freedoms in America proves the absence of control. It does not. It only proves you confuse permission with power. Yes Americans can insult the President. Yes they can tweet at Congress. Yes they can joke about the FBI. None of that threatens the system. None of that changes policy. None of that stops a war a sanction a coup a bombing campaign a corporate merger or a lobbyist-written bill. In Vietnam political power is explicit. In America political power hides behind the illusion that criticism equals influence. You"
X Link 2025-12-08T16:58Z 95.7K followers, 41.3K engagements

"Dan the only reason there are survivors of Pol Pot for you to misquote is because socialist Vietnam intervened to stop the genocide while the United States backed the Khmer Rouge and defended them at the UN. So the last person who gets to lecture me about Cambodia is an American"
X Link 2025-12-09T06:43Z 95.7K followers, 63.2K engagements

"You are repeating talking points that fall apart the moment you look at the actual timeline. Vietnam did not sit idle from 1975 to 1979. Vietnam spent those years under constant attack from the Khmer Rouge. The Khmer Rouge launched hundreds of cross-border raids. They shelled Vietnamese villages. They massacred entire communities. They claimed the Mekong Delta and openly declared that Vietnam should not exist as a nation. By 1977 and 1978 Pol Pot was not only committing genocide inside Cambodia. He was committing atrocities inside Vietnam including mass killings of ethnic Vietnamese and Khmer"
X Link 2025-12-09T19:20Z 95.7K followers, 10.4K engagements

"The mistake is assuming Vietnam thinks in straight lines. Western analysts do that. Vietnamese history does not. For 3000 years Vietnam has lived between empires. Survival required a diplomacy that looks contradictory from the outside and perfectly logical from within. We fought China for a thousand years. We fought the United States for twenty. We fought the Khmer Rouge backed by both China and the U.S. to stop a genocide. And yet after every war Vietnam rebuilt relations with the same powers it fought. Why Because Vietnam does not build foreign policy on emotion. Vietnam builds it on"
X Link 2025-12-10T16:35Z 95.7K followers, 6361 engagements

"Nothing in America is real except the violence. The democracy is curated. The elections are purchased. The economy is engineered to fail upward. But the bombs are real. The prisons are real. The hunger is real. The lies are the wallpaper. The suffering is the foundation"
X Link 2025-12-10T16:48Z 95.7K followers, 17.9K engagements

"Vietnam made the news only because the scale of the atrocity broke through the screen. But even then America didnt stop out of conscience. It stopped because it lost. And since then Grenada. Panama. Iraq. Yugoslavia. Afghanistan. Libya. Syria. Yemen. Gaza. Not one of those wars was stopped by headlines. Not one produced a national reckoning. Not one changed the machinery. The lesson wasnt moral. The lesson was technical. They learned to control the narrative. They learned to embed reporters. They learned to sanitize footage. They learned to wage war where the cameras cannot go. Youre right"
X Link 2025-12-11T07:10Z 95.7K followers, XX engagements

"Only someone raised inside the American illusion could look at a collapsing empire and point at China's currency. You live in a country where The debt is unpayable The infrastructure is rotting The bridges are collapsing The homelessness is exploding The healthcare system is a graveyard And the dollar survives only because the world is too scared to call the bluff. And you are worried about "ghost cities." A ghost city still becomes a city. A bridge that collapses in China gets rebuilt in months. A dam that cracks gets replaced with a stronger one. But in America A bridge collapses and it"
X Link 2025-12-11T08:35Z 95.8K followers, 12.8K engagements

"Nothing reveals the psychology of empire more clearly than what you just celebrated. A country drowning in debt. A country with collapsing bridges. A country where millions cannot afford rent or insulin. A country that cannot pass a budget without shutting itself down. And you think the victory is seizing another nations oil on the open seas. This is not strength. This is addiction. For decades Washington has treated the oceans as its private police zone. It steals cargo. It hijacks tankers. It starves nations through sanctions that no one voted for and no court ever approved. It calls this"
X Link 2025-12-11T09:24Z 95.8K followers, 81.6K engagements

"No one denies that China made disastrous mistakes during the Great Leap Forward. Every serious historian including Chinese ones has acknowledged that era's failures. But what you're doing here is something different: You are taking a chaotic experimental post-colonial nation in the 1950s a country that had just emerged from a century of invasions civil wars famines and colonial predation and reducing its entire socialist trajectory to one photograph and one policy. And you are doing it to avoid the actual point we were discussing: Pol Pot's crimes were not Marxism and Vietnam a socialist"
X Link 2025-12-11T11:51Z 95.8K followers, 19.1K engagements

"You keep talking about Mao's "economic idiocy" because you cannot confront the real historical question: What would China have become if Mao had lost Had the Kuomintang won China would not be the China you see today. It would be a client state. Its ports patrolled. Its elections supervised. Its currency dictated. Its military leased. Its economy carved open like a carcass for American corporations. Not because the Chinese are weak but because that is what happened to every other country the U.S. "saved" in the 20th century. Mao did not just defeat an army. He prevented a century of American"
X Link 2025-12-11T15:02Z 95.8K followers, 12.6K engagements

"Three things. First poverty. When people say China "ended poverty" they are talking about extreme poverty the kind where people starve have no electricity no access to schools no medical care. China went from XX% extreme poverty in 1980 to near zero today. That is the largest poverty-reduction achievement in human history. No other nation has ever done that. Certainly not the nations lecturing China about governance while letting their own citizens sleep under bridges. Second "human rights violations." This is always the part where Western rhetoric enters autopilot. Human rights discourse in"
X Link 2025-12-11T17:43Z 95.8K followers, 104K engagements

"@SS1123469 If the U.S. truly believed it could survive without global trade it would not be panicking about de-dollarization supply chain relocation rare earth access or BRICS expansion"
X Link 2025-12-12T07:29Z 95.7K followers, XXX engagements

"Population aging and falling birth rates are real. They matter. But they are not destiny and they are certainly not unique to China. Japan aged first and did not collapse. South Korea is aging faster than China. Europe is aging faster than China. The United States is aging too just with immigration masking it. What people consistently underestimate is state capacity and adaptability. China is not a laissez-faire system waiting to be shocked into failure. It actively manages demographics through productivity gains automation education infrastructure and long-term planning. A shrinking"
X Link 2025-12-12T17:05Z 95.8K followers, 10.6K engagements

"This is a textbook example of ahistorical framing dressed up as concern. Lets start with your core premise because everything else collapses once its corrected. China did not begin at "92% poverty" because of Mao. China began there because of a century of imperial destruction. In 1949 China inherited: A country carved up by foreign powers. Its ports controlled. Its customs dictated. Its economy hollowed out. Tens of millions dead from war famine and occupation. No unified state. No modern industry. No sovereignty. You keep talking about Maos "27 years" as if they occurred in a vacuum. They"
X Link 2025-12-12T18:23Z 95.7K followers, 35.7K engagements

"The U.S. does not lie because it must. It lies because it cannot stop. Truth to America is like sunlight to a vampire. It recoils. It hisses. It invents another myth. And then calls the myth "who we are.""
X Link 2025-12-13T07:37Z 95.8K followers, 11.3K engagements

""Weak regimes cannot tolerate X." That line only works if you confuse control with strength. China does not restrict platforms because it is weak. China restricts platforms because it understands something the U.S. forgot: Information is infrastructure. Narratives are sovereignty. And chaos is not freedom. Weak regimes outsource their public sphere to foreign corporations foreign intelligence services and algorithmic outrage machines. Strong states do not. China watched what happened to the Soviet Union when information warfare hollowed out legitimacy from the inside. It watched what happened"
X Link 2025-12-13T10:37Z 95.8K followers, 7325 engagements

"This is one of the most accurate descriptions of power in the digital age I have seen on this platform. You are right on the core point: Informational hegemony is not about persuasion. It is about pre-structuring reality itself. Once you control the architecture of attention communication encryption and credibility you no longer need overt repression. People police themselves. Resistance dissolves before it coheres. Dissent becomes noise. This is precisely why the idea of "private ownership" of social media is a fiction. Platforms are not neutral tools. They are strategic terrain. Which is"
X Link 2025-12-13T11:28Z 95.8K followers, 13.5K engagements

"Every American war is a domestic policy failure in disguise. Vietnam hid the collapse of legitimacy. Iraq hid the collapse of manufacturing. Afghanistan hid the collapse of empire. Venezuela hides the collapse of the American dream"
X Link 2025-12-14T07:34Z 95.8K followers, 11.8K engagements

"Ask yourself why every atrocity is immediately framed before its investigated. Why the conclusion arrives before the facts. Why "Islamic" is a category but "Western" never is. This isnt journalism. Its pre-authorization"
X Link 2025-12-14T18:02Z 95.8K followers, 63K engagements

"They want Muslims to be the villain so badly Because it keeps you from seeing the system. If terror has a religion you wont notice it also has a budget a supply chain and a foreign policy"
X Link 2025-12-14T18:32Z 95.8K followers, 91.4K engagements

"I am not debating your personal journey with Islam. That is yours. What I am challenging is the category error you just made. Every ideology on earth has texts that can be selectively weaponized. The Bible. The Torah. The Quran. Marx. Locke. Even liberal democracy. Yet only one category is treated as an explanation in itself. When a Muslim commits violence the religion becomes the cause. When a Westerner commits violence the ideology disappears. It is never called "Christian terrorism." Never "liberal terrorism." Never "Western terrorism." It is lone wolf. Mental health. Security failure."
X Link 2025-12-14T18:42Z 95.8K followers, 54.8K engagements

"Yes my friend. And not because journalists are uniquely evil or incompetent. But because corporate media does not exist to inform. It exists to frame. Notice the pattern: One incident in the West triggers saturation coverage speculation motive-hunting and moral theater. Hundreds of Palestinians killed after a so-called "ceasefire" triggers silence euphemism or bureaucratic language. That is not an accident. That is not coincidence. That is alignment. Power decides what is an "event" and what is "background noise." Whose deaths demand scrutiny. Whose deaths are treated as weather. So no you"
X Link 2025-12-14T18:56Z 95.8K followers, 15.1K engagements

"When you study empire long enough You realize that escalation is never a policy failure. It is the operating system. A nation built on expansion interprets restraint as collapse and cooperation as humiliation. To maintain the illusion of dominance It must always create a crisis it cannot solve So it can justify a power it no longer has"
X Link 2025-12-15T07:54Z 95.8K followers, 6813 engagements

"You are proving my point not refuting it. You say the Bible "cannot be weaponized except for evil" yet in the very next breath you carve out an exception large enough to justify violence killing and national sanctification. You invoke goodness repentance and virtue and then immediately reserve the right to decide who "threatens liberty" who counts as an enemy and who deserves to "meet their maker" early. That is not a moral firewall. That is moral discretion backed by power. Every ideology that claims it cannot be weaponized always makes one exception: when we do it. Christian texts have"
X Link 2025-12-15T11:05Z 95.8K followers, 12.3K engagements

"Every empire survives by telling you what is normal. Normal to invade. Normal to bomb. Normal to sanction. Normal to starve. And normal to celebrate it. Interrogate your normal. It might be violence in disguise"
X Link 2025-12-15T11:46Z 95.8K followers, 8130 engagements

"Islam didnt invent terrorism. The U.S. did. It burned Tokyo alive. It vaporized Hiroshima. It carpet-bombed Korea. It dismembered Vietnam. It turned the Middle East into a graveyard and called it peace. If terrorism has a capital it isnt Tehran. Its Washington"
X Link 2025-12-15T12:37Z 95.8K followers, 883.7K engagements

"Youre confusing atrocity with system. Yes Japan committed the Nanjing massacre. Yes Britain starved India. Yes empires have slaughtered civilians for centuries. Thats not the argument. The argument is this: The United States didnt invent mass killing. It invented the modern doctrine of terror as policy and then wrapped it in legality bureaucracy and moral language. Firebombing cities was not a battlefield accident. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not acts of desperation. Korea was not collateral damage. Vietnam Laos and Cambodia were not excess. They were deliberate strategies to break civilian"
X Link 2025-12-15T13:26Z 95.8K followers, 222.7K engagements

"I agree with you on one important point: labels shape interpretation and inconsistency corrodes trust. But this is precisely where I think your framing still underestimates the asymmetry. In Western media violence by perpetrators perceived as Muslim is not primarily individualized. It is conditionally individualized. In the first hours there may be caution. Mental health. Lone actor. Careful language. But that caution exists only until an Islamic connection can be asserted or insinuated. Once it is the act is rapidly folded into a civilizational narrative. Islam. Radicalization. Community"
X Link 2025-12-15T17:11Z 95.8K followers, 5873 engagements

"Pearl Harbor was a military strike on a military base. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not. They were cities. Filled with civilians. Children doctors factory workers old people. Burned and vaporized to make a geopolitical point not to stop an invasion that had not even been planned yet. And lets be clear about the lie you slipped in so casually. Japan was already seeking surrender through intermediaries. The condition was the emperor. The U.S. accepted that condition anyway after the bombs. So the bombings did not change the terms. They changed the message. The message was not to Japan. It was to"
X Link 2025-12-15T19:48Z 95.8K followers, 237.9K engagements

"They dropped the first atom bomb on Hiroshima. Then three days later they dropped another on Nagasaki. Not to win. Not to defend. But to test. To compare damage. To measure death. And the world still wonders why some call it terrorism"
X Link 2025-12-15T19:52Z 95.8K followers, 87.4K engagements

"Operation Downfall casualty estimates are not facts. They are projections produced by the same military institutions that had already committed to using the bomb. They range wildly. From hundreds of thousands to several millions. Because they were designed to justify a decision already taken not to neutrally evaluate alternatives. Here is what is not speculative. Japan was already seeking surrender through intermediaries. The sticking point was the emperor. The United States accepted that condition anyway after the bombs. So the bombs did not avert an invasion by changing Japans terms. They"
X Link 2025-12-16T06:18Z 95.8K followers, 6033 engagements

"Nothing you just wrote is true and the confidence with which you repeat it is exactly how empire reproduces stupidity. First let us bury the lie that this was not terrorism. If non-state actors deliberately killing civilians to terrorize a population is terrorism then a state deliberately killing civilians to terrorize a population is not suddenly something else just because it wears a uniform and writes the history books. Napalm villages. Free-fire zones. Body count quotas. Strategic hamlets. Phoenix Program assassinations. Carpet bombing of the countryside. Chemical defoliation that"
X Link 2025-12-16T06:49Z 95.8K followers, 12.2K engagements

"What is a drone strike if not terrorism with a budget What is a sanctions regime if not terrorism in a suit What is a coup if not terrorism in a handshake The United States perfected terrorism by making it bureaucratic. By filing the paperwork. By making mass murder look like foreign policy"
X Link 2025-12-16T06:54Z 95.8K followers, 5363 engagements

"If the U.S. were not the biggest terrorist in history Why would it need XXX bases Why would it arm dictators and fund secret wars Why would it kill millions abroad Then call it "defense" The answer is simple. Because terror is not the enemy of America. It is Americas most consistent export"
X Link 2025-12-16T07:19Z 95.8K followers, 27.5K engagements

"The U.S. didnt save China from Japan. It armed Japan with oil and steel turned its back on Nanjing and only stepped in when its own empire was threatened. Thats the American way wait until the bodies pile high enough to stand on then claim the moral high ground"
X Link 2025-12-16T07:34Z 95.8K followers, 43.5K engagements

"@MemeConstabIe"
X Link 2025-12-16T07:34Z 95.8K followers, 21.3K engagements

"America believes it is exceptional. And it is. Exceptionally violent. Exceptionally unstable. Exceptionally destructive. It is the only country that could end human civilization And still blame everyone else for the smoke. Stopping it is not hatred. It is humanity defending itself"
X Link 2025-12-16T08:08Z 95.8K followers, 16.6K engagements

"Read your sentence again slowly. "It saved American lives." "It was justified." "Booms away to any country that threatens us." That is not strategy. It is a moral doctrine: If killing women and children reduces American risk then killing women and children is justified. That is the entire argument. Own it. Hiroshima was not a battlefield. Nagasaki was not a battlefield. They were civilian cities. Infants vaporized in their cribs. Doctors incinerated in hospitals. Workers burned alive on their way to work. Old people erased in a flash of light. None of them threatened you. None of them"
X Link 2025-12-16T14:28Z 95.8K followers, 35.8K engagements

"They didnt make you fear Muslims by accident. They trained you. Image by image. Headline by headline. They took a political conflict and dressed it in theology So bombs could feel like culture wars And occupation could feel like self-defense. Hate is easier to sell than history"
X Link 2025-12-16T16:59Z 95.8K followers, 63.5K engagements

"@ysonokosan "We warned them" is the language of every war criminal who wants the victims to carry the guilt for their own extermination. Hiroshima yesterday. Gaza today. Same script. Same excuse. Same crime"
X Link 2025-12-16T17:29Z 95.8K followers, 2392 engagements

"Show me the sentence where I "excused" Japanese atrocities. You will not find it. Saying "what Japan did was monstrous" and "vaporizing cities full of civilians is also monstrous" is not a contradiction. It is called having one moral standard. What you are defending is the opposite. Japanese atrocities are used to justify American ones. American atrocities must never be used to judge American power. That is the asymmetry I am attacking. You want a world where Pearl Harbor explains everything Japan suffered But Hiroshima Nagasaki Tokyo Korea Vietnam Iraq and beyond explain nothing about the"
X Link 2025-12-16T18:21Z 95.8K followers, 9444 engagements

"Islamophobia was not born in a vacuum. It was engineered. A trillion-dollar psyop funded by think tanks intelligence agencies and media moguls. They needed a new devil after the Soviets fell. So they built one brown bearded and barefoot. And every bomb since has been blessed by that lie"
X Link 2025-12-17T07:05Z 95.8K followers, 73.5K engagements

"People say "I did my research." But what they mean is "I found content that agreed with me." Real research changes you. Real research costs you pride. Real research forces you to admit you were wrong. Ask yourself. When was the last time a belief of yours died If the answer is never you are not learning. You are guarding an identity"
X Link 2025-12-17T07:21Z 95.8K followers, 8972 engagements

"If Muslims are irrational then bombing them is reasonable. If theyre fanatics then starving them is necessary. If their faith is the problem then land theft becomes medicine. Thats not analysis. Thats dehumanization by design"
X Link 2025-12-17T11:11Z 95.8K followers, 15.3K engagements

"Donald you just wrote the most honest colonial confession of the 21st century. When you say Venezuela must "return" its oil land and assets to the United States you are not talking about law. You are talking about ownership. You are saying out loud what empire has always believed in private: What lies under Venezuelan soil belongs to Washington. What grows on Venezuelan land belongs to U.S. corporations. What Venezuela builds for itself is "stolen" if it is not built for you. That is not security. That is naked imperial entitlement. Let us be precise. Venezuela did not invade Texas. It did"
X Link 2025-12-17T12:02Z 95.8K followers, 688.5K engagements

"@kajakallas"
X Link 2025-12-17T12:42Z 95.8K followers, 5228 engagements

"The U.S. calls Venezuela a failed state. But what do you call a country that cant feed its people Cant house its citizens Cant stop overdoses Cant stop shootings Yet can afford war everywhere"
X Link 2025-12-17T13:30Z 95.8K followers, 28.8K engagements

""Perhaps research" I did. I even read the screenshots you posted. Venezuela did not steal U.S. government property. It nationalized its own oil industry a right explicitly recognized under international law and practiced by dozens of countries including U.S. allies. What you are calling "theft" was the revision of private corporate contracts by a sovereign state. Arbitration rulings protect investors not morality and certainly not empire. The land was Venezuelan. The oil was Venezuelan. And the profits had already been extracted many times over. Calling sovereignty "the largest theft in"
X Link 2025-12-17T17:16Z 95.8K followers, 14.9K engagements

"If Trump were "taking the murder and poisoning of Americas youth seriously" his war wouldnt start in Caracas. It would start in Connecticut and on Wall Street. The kids overdosing in Ohio are not dying on Venezuelan cocaine. They are dying on pills pushed by American pharmaceutical cartels laundered by American banks and greenlit by American regulators who looked the other way. If "narcoterrorism" meant what you pretend it means Purdue Pharma would be in handcuffs not Miraflores Palace in Trumps crosshairs. You talk about "impunity for Maduro" as if Washington didnt bankroll actual death"
X Link 2025-12-17T18:25Z 95.8K followers, 15.9K engagements