@msvadari Avatar @msvadari Mayukha Vadari

Mayukha Vadari posts on X about ledger, in the, axelar, community the most. They currently have [------] followers and [----] posts still getting attention that total [-----] engagements in the last [--] hours.

Engagements: [-----] #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: [--] #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: [------] #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: [---------] #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence cryptocurrencies finance technology brands stocks exchanges countries currencies travel destinations social networks automotive brands

Social topic influence ledger, in the, axelar, community, xrp, token, transactions, decentralized, onchain, to the

Top assets mentioned Axelar (AXL) XRP (XRP) Sologenic (SOLO) Ripple USD (RLUSD) Ethereum (ETH) Bitcoin (BTC) Algorand (ALGO) Coinbase Global Inc. (COIN)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"@illneil @woj4ke @fredostat @daniel_wwf It's only slightly more complicated for XRP - compare the amount in the mainnet door to the total amount of XRP (which is available in ledger RPC calls) minus what's still in the sidechain door"
X Link 2023-06-01T13:51Z 11.5K followers, [---] engagements

"@hazardcookie @RichardXRPL This makes more sense for an IOU I think"
X Link 2023-07-07T22:28Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@hazardcookie I didn't know @Vet_X0 had his own cryptocurrency"
X Link 2023-07-11T10:07Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"Excited to be presenting at Apex on XRPL plugins a way to write Layer [--] XRPL features in the language of your choice (such as Python) It'll be a 3-peat for me presenting at every Apex that's happened so far. Looking forward to meeting everyone who'll be there"
X Link 2023-09-02T17:04Z [----] followers, 14.9K engagements

"@grandorganics @MYKL_SKTT @bigcjat There's a legal difference I believe so banks etc need it. You can always just choose to hold un-clawback-able assets - the clawback flag can only be set at the very beginning of the issuer account's lifetime so you can never be bait-and-switched"
X Link 2023-09-07T05:32Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"If you're at Apex and coming to my workshop please bring your laptop (ideally with Docker installed)"
X Link 2023-09-07T10:41Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"#ApexDevSummit knows how to throw a party 🎉"
X Link 2023-09-07T19:08Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"My flight is cancelled (we find out only an hour before even though it's due to not having a crew) and @KLM won't let me have my checked suitcase - apparently all the baggage handlers had already left for the day at 5pm"
X Link 2023-09-10T15:59Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@angell_denis @Silkjaer @xrp_hodl_r @jungleincX @GateHub It would also probably be possible to implement a witness server in Evernode"
X Link 2023-09-10T19:05Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @Vet_X0 @JoelKatz @xrpl365 @SwiftBovine @RichardXRPL @FlippingAlgos Network IDs aren't enforced in any way there's nothing forcing a fork to choose a new Network ID"
X Link 2023-09-13T13:00Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @Vet_X0 @JoelKatz @xrpl365 @SwiftBovine @RichardXRPL @FlippingAlgos Yes @Vet_X0's comment doesn't talk about XRP at all. You still need to choose one side of a fork for IOU B2M"
X Link 2023-09-13T13:02Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @Vet_X0 @JoelKatz @xrpl365 @SwiftBovine @RichardXRPL @FlippingAlgos How would you enforce it It would only be via social pressure there's no way for chains to know anything else about other chains"
X Link 2023-09-13T13:03Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Vet_X0 Isn't it already scheduled for Amsterdam Lol"
X Link 2023-09-16T22:20Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@grandorganics @XRPvalidators @WietseWind ETH rewards validators not nodes. I don't think any major protocol rewards people for running nodes (at least not directly)"
X Link 2023-09-26T17:45Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@panosmek For a node that makes sense but for a validator I don't know if I'd trust someone else to vote on my behalf. Perhaps the better solution would be some sort of validator-in-a-box where you don't need much technical knowledge to set it up and there's a nice UI for voting etc"
X Link 2023-09-28T12:54Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Vet_X0 @dazzlingxrpl Plugins are really only useful for experimentation and sidechains. C++ will always be needed for mainnet plugins - it's more performant and secure. Plugins are also somewhat limited in scope - you can only add new features (at least for now) you can't e.g. mess with consensus"
X Link 2023-09-28T22:47Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@xrp_hodl_r @Vet_X0 @dazzlingxrpl Feel free to write code however you want - I use VSCode (on a Mac FWIW) but there's no IDE restriction (I'm not 100% sure this compiles on Windows yet tbh)"
X Link 2023-09-29T00:36Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"Had a great time hanging out with the $xrp community at the #ProperParty"
X Link 2023-09-30T06:20Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@daniel_wwf @Vet_X0 smh and people wonder why crypto has a problem recruiting women"
X Link 2023-09-30T22:43Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@woj4ke @ShortTheFOMO I sure hope they read the docs on offers before writing a bot to create them. I don't think there's a docs page for writing a non-AMM market maker right now anyways"
X Link 2023-10-03T17:24Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @woj4ke You wouldn't need to constantly deposit/withdraw for DEX trades - you'd just keep the offers open and they'd execute when they are both satisfied and funded"
X Link 2023-10-03T17:27Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@offledger @ShortTheFOMO @grandorganics @bigcjat @JoelKatz @808cryptobeast @MohFitX That's why they're not here right now - because they need the Clawback feature"
X Link 2023-10-04T20:22Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@bigcjat @Vet_X0 @offledger @JoelKatz @808cryptobeast @ShortTheFOMO @MohFitX @grandorganics Lol I had nothing to do with the clawback amendment other than reviewing a couple of tooling PRs. Everything I've said is my personal opinion - I don't speak for Ripple (and on this issue I can't because I don't know anything)"
X Link 2023-10-04T20:51Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@bigcjat @Vet_X0 @offledger @JoelKatz @808cryptobeast @ShortTheFOMO @MohFitX @grandorganics I'm not obligated to come to this website and respond to comments - I'm a Senior Software Engineer it's not anywhere in my job description. I come here because I like talking to the community and hearing their viewpoints. Ripple isn't forcing me to say anything"
X Link 2023-10-04T20:54Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@KhaledElawadi @offledger @JoelKatz @5hamil @Vet_X0 @808cryptobeast @ShortTheFOMO @bigcjat @MohFitX @grandorganics @xrptoolkit Why would they do that though It's not in an issuer's best interests. If they're stealing funds from users the token effectively becomes worthless due to lack of issuer trust which sucks for the issuer too"
X Link 2023-10-05T15:20Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@QuinnyPig Monday isn't necessarily a day off in the US though - I don't have it off and neither do most of the other devs I know"
X Link 2023-10-06T02:58Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Vet_X0 @1NationUnderXRP Copying here for ease of reference: https://x.com/WietseWind/status/1710393763070202321s=20 @Vet_X0 My guesstimate is that mainnet will result in halving these numbers. I don't see [---] tps XRPXRP happening just like that but I can easily see AMM hitting [--] tps at some point. Which is a double edged sword: great if used () but also pretty dangerous for XRPL throughput. https://x.com/WietseWind/status/1710393763070202321s=20 @Vet_X0 My guesstimate is that mainnet will result in halving these numbers. I don't see [---] tps XRPXRP happening just like that but I can easily"
X Link 2023-10-06T21:33Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@krippenreiter @daniel_wwf There's no reason for validators to be part of the cluster - users don't need access to them (in fact they shouldn't because you want to keep them extra secure - you don't want to allow external access to validators). Clusters should only be nodes"
X Link 2023-10-07T18:09Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @illneil @JoelKatz I don't see how clawback is involved in that flow"
X Link 2023-10-09T04:34Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@krippenreiter @husseinb Stellar introduced AMMs in November [----] and it looks like the failed transaction spike started a few months before that. Do you have any insight into that"
X Link 2023-10-11T02:30Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@heft_ig @Vet_X0 @krippenreiter @husseinb Circular payments are already doable on the XRPL though: "You can usecircular paymentsto complete multi-asset trades for a profit.""
X Link 2023-10-11T11:29Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@BiasGoose @ShortTheFOMO @zerpmonxrp Yeah I don't see anything wrong with this for a non-UNL validator"
X Link 2023-10-15T21:33Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @BiasGoose @zerpmonxrp I certainly wouldn't recommend putting this validator on your UNL but it's a decentralized system - validators can choose to vote however they want it's just on the rest of the validators to decide whether they trust that person/their voting reasoning"
X Link 2023-10-15T22:02Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@krippenreiter @intelliot Just crunch time in terms of getting PRs in before it's closed for testing not too much stress (at least for me - I'm currently at the #WNBAFinals game lol)"
X Link 2023-10-19T00:27Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@offledger @Vet_X0 @daniel_wwf @kyekye_one @RippleXDev @DigPerspectives I read the original comment. I have no clue if this person runs a validator but they're certainly welcome (even encouraged) to set one up. I'm not trying to manipulate anything just trying to educate people on how they can vote if they want to"
X Link 2023-10-20T03:20Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@WietseWind @XrpGoat @xMoonkie @uptownsaul Well said"
X Link 2023-10-20T22:10Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@MetaMan_X @JoelKatz @Vet_X0 @offledger @daniel_wwf It's already publicly available here:"
X Link 2023-10-21T18:33Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"For those curious on how the #XRPL fee escalation works I stumbled upon this explanation today:"
X Link 2023-10-21T18:35Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@KhaledElawadi @trueIoV @JoelKatz They're just removed from existence. No burn wallet or anything just burned"
X Link 2023-10-22T16:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"100%. Don't harass validators for having a different risk tolerance. I've read a lot of UNL validators' explanations for voting "no" on this website and all of them are reasonable. If they were acting in bad faith then yes they shouldn't be trusted but I don't see that here"
X Link 2023-10-23T14:17Z [----] followers, 10.4K engagements

"@MetaMan_X The audit reports have been handed over there are additional concerns. The relevant folks (AKA not me lol) are working on responding to and resolving those concerns. Everyone just has to be patient"
X Link 2023-10-23T15:09Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@MetaMan_X There's a difference between opposing the amendment and waiting to enable it. I don't think any of the UNL validators have been against the amendment itself they just want to make sure it won't break the ledger before enabling it"
X Link 2023-10-23T15:23Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@WickedWitchXRP @Vet_X0 @MetaMan_X Agreed but not at the cost of the XRPL falling over which is what the validators are concerned about. It's not the design that's an issue it's the implementation details which by necessity are different from other blockchains"
X Link 2023-10-23T16:47Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@angell_denis @daniel_wwf @Vet_X0 @MaxEntropyy @WillingWitness This issue has only been an issue with the path_find RPC command and hasn't shown up in validators at all"
X Link 2023-10-24T17:33Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@xrpscan @daniel_wwf https://github.com/ripple/validator-history-service/ https://github.com/ripple/validator-history-service/"
X Link 2023-10-25T16:47Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@WietseWind Does anyone actually calculate NFTokenIDs themselves It's pretty complex I assumed most people just pulled it from the metadata (that's what livenet and xrpl.js do)"
X Link 2023-10-26T13:06Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO Any objections"
X Link 2023-10-27T02:29Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@illneil @WietseWind The explorer does: speak for the other ones as I haven't poked around them a ton"
X Link 2023-10-30T21:55Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@bigcjat @Vet_X0 @Gary43371722 @MrFreshTime @xspectDS @JoelKatz @QuadJacksXRP He didn't say nothing had been done prior (agreed there are a lot of amazing projects + devs that have been around since before) just that NFTs were a success and a lot of awesome devs and projects came to the XRPL because of it. Including @Vet_X0 himself I believe"
X Link 2023-10-31T17:19Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"I think you guys will like this new spec for NFT Escrows: Two XLS specs for the #XRPL dropped in one week 🤘 https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/discussions/146 https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/discussions/146"
X Link 2023-11-17T19:19Z 13.3K followers, 36.7K engagements

"@Vet_X0 @ayang2294 lmao"
X Link 2023-11-22T23:48Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @Vet_X0 @angell_denis It works for me with Xcode [--] remind me on Monday and I can help you resolve the issue if you want"
X Link 2023-11-24T05:53Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@stephenchip @Vet_X0 @DarkhorseDNME4 @WietseWind I've talked to many people within Ripple who are very excited about hooks. There was definitely no conspiracy to prevent hooks. IMO it was just a misunderstanding"
X Link 2023-11-25T17:22Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@krippenreiter @panosmek @Vet_X0 @SpaceArtisan2 You'd still be able to bridge IOU tokens though"
X Link 2023-11-25T23:35Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Fayala_brash @woj4ke @RippleXDev This appears to be part of a different company Ripple Ventures"
X Link 2023-11-28T06:11Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@clhubes Did you tell Spotify to ignore them There's a new-ish feature that allows you to do that"
X Link 2023-11-30T22:32Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@RichardXRPL @illneil @ohclaytonn Why not add that logic to the normal payment/trustline transactions instead so you can have the best of all worlds"
X Link 2023-12-04T00:16Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO this is what happens when @daniel_wwf stops blocking the network from reaching it's full potential 😜"
X Link 2023-12-07T05:08Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@sentosumosaba @Ripple @JoelKatz @XahauNetwork A future feature idea for his project not for the network 🙂"
X Link 2023-12-07T14:59Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"I've had some ideas for atomic and batch transactions for a few weeks now but finally got around to putting it all on paper for you all to read. I think this is game-changing for the XRPL and unlocks a lot of usecases. #XRPL #XRPLedger https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/discussions/162 https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/discussions/162"
X Link 2023-12-07T18:57Z 13.3K followers, 35.9K engagements

"The best part of the new @Ripple office is the name of the cafe"
X Link 2023-12-11T22:26Z 13.3K followers, 79.2K engagements

"@xrpcafe @Ripple New NFT collection"
X Link 2023-12-11T22:48Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@krippenreiter @Ripple @xrpcafe @xrpcafe doesn't serve xrpresso"
X Link 2023-12-11T22:49Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@krippenreiter @sparkplu9 @xrpl @Vet_X0 The date has been updated to January 8:"
X Link 2023-12-18T20:08Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@bigcjat @WietseWind @helicondarkstar"
X Link 2023-12-27T03:29Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@daniel_wwf @Vet_X0 @DarkhorseDNME4 @angell_denis @JoelKatz @WietseWind Barely It handled it just fine"
X Link 2023-12-27T05:15Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@illneil @hazardcookie @daniel_wwf @Vet_X0 @DarkhorseDNME4 @angell_denis @JoelKatz @WietseWind The Ripple validator is running 2.0.0-rc6 not 1.12.0 like the others so its issues probably stem from that. There were some known issues with consensus in rc5 it's possible that they weren't fully resolved in rc6"
X Link 2023-12-27T08:00Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@JScottBranson @BatTecking @chintokkong @WietseWind @helicondarkstar I was looking at the fact that the clusters reported no problems and all validators (except for Ripple's running an rc and a known problematic one) maintained 99.4% validations - and Ripple's was still 98%"
X Link 2023-12-27T19:50Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@alloynetworks @illneil @DarkhorseDNME4 @hazardcookie @daniel_wwf @Vet_X0 @angell_denis @JoelKatz @WietseWind @illneil @hazardcookie @daniel_wwf @Vet_X0 @DarkhorseDNME4 @angell_denis @JoelKatz @WietseWind The Ripple validator is running 2.0.0-rc6 not 1.12.0 like the others so its issues probably stem from that. There were some known issues with consensus in rc5 it's possible that they weren't fully resolved in rc6. @illneil @hazardcookie @daniel_wwf @Vet_X0 @DarkhorseDNME4 @angell_denis @JoelKatz @WietseWind The Ripple validator is running 2.0.0-rc6 not 1.12.0 like the others so its issues"
X Link 2023-12-27T19:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@SonofGodTexas @DarkhorseDNME4 @Vet_X0 @angell_denis @daniel_wwf @WietseWind @ShortTheFOMO @JoelKatz Different validators have different levels of risk tolerance. Several validators have made the decision that the performance improvements in [---] satisfy their threshold for safety"
X Link 2023-12-28T00:47Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@DarkhorseDNME4 @WietseWind @Vet_X0 @angell_denis @daniel_wwf @ShortTheFOMO @JoelKatz It didn't struggle at [--] it was fine. The risk tolerance is re voting for AMM not for upgrading. Ripple's validator had some infra issues that have since been resolved. Tests will be conducted but if you want something sooner you'll have to do it yourself"
X Link 2023-12-28T01:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@ZIGXRP @WietseWind @JScottBranson You can have the passion without the knowledge (say if you're building an app and don't want to depend on public infra but don't have any infra experience). Getting started is still hard"
X Link 2023-12-28T04:10Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@HbarWhisky @SteinHBARbarian @CBucano @WietseWind @helicondarkstar What is a consensus submit message then"
X Link 2023-12-28T22:32Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@offledger @Vet_X0 @krippenreiter @thinklast @RippleXDev Only a couple of UNL validators had issues with the load and one of the issues has since been fixed (Ripple's validator's issues were unrelated to the load it had missed a few validations even without load). And that's a pretty minor misunderstanding of how the nUNL works"
X Link 2023-12-29T02:08Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Pflatsch7 @BatTecking @chintokkong @WietseWind @helicondarkstar No there's no L2 involved. This is just L1 transactions"
X Link 2023-12-29T18:31Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@ZachRector7 @Vet_X0"
X Link 2023-12-30T03:53Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@woj4ke Lmao I haven't thought about that acronym since high school"
X Link 2023-12-30T17:22Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@xrpl_adam @jamilKaamil @JScottBranson @XrpGoat I haven't been able to get a straight answer as to what "consensus submit messages" are because Hedera claims it doesn't count gossip protocol messages as transactions. Do you happen to have a good answer"
X Link 2023-12-30T18:47Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@SchlaubiD @BiasGoose @Vet_X0 That's the biggest part I don't understand either - what's the source of truth and how do you deal with the legal stuff But this is what RWA platforms/projects need to solve. I look forward to seeing their solutions"
X Link 2024-01-02T16:01Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@XRP_Kong You want a quote from someone else Okay. Be careful and stay away from this They did not even take the time to understand the XRPL and properly adapt inscriptions. There is no open source indexer published. On top this is riding on pure marketing und ledger spam to cause "hype" literally handful accounts. Be careful and stay away from this They did not even take the time to understand the XRPL and properly adapt inscriptions. There is no open source indexer published. On top this is riding on pure marketing und ledger spam to cause "hype" literally handful accounts"
X Link 2024-01-03T16:39Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO The bigger networks (Bitcoin Ethereum etc.) don't count them. I don't think we should either. But it doesn't hurt to have that number readily available for when we need it 🙂"
X Link 2024-01-04T04:22Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@JoshuaHamsa @Vet_X0 That's not submitted to the network so it doesn't count"
X Link 2024-01-05T14:47Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO You've never run a local node for a few minutes on mainnet just to make sure you could do it or to fetch mainnet data at a faster rate via an admin connection"
X Link 2024-01-06T02:00Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@XrpGoat @AverageJohnXRP The UNL validators are all run by Ripple"
X Link 2024-01-06T18:17Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Vet_X0 @bgarlinghouse 🧐🧐🧐"
X Link 2024-01-10T22:04Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@XRPoutsider @ShortTheFOMO @MattRosendin Sounds like an interesting project 🙂"
X Link 2024-01-11T02:20Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO The only [---] node missing validations in the past hour is xspectar which has had some minor issues in the past few days IIRC. Most [---] nodes are doing just fine rn. Have you had any syncing issues with [---] Same question to @Vet_X0 since I know you're around right now"
X Link 2024-01-11T11:59Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@emy_wng Congrats 🎉"
X Link 2024-01-12T04:16Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO Can you point me to where Ripple has been pushing people to update after the issue was discovered"
X Link 2024-01-12T15:14Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO This type of issue is difficult to identify as a software bug - unless/until it's widespread you'd assume it's a hardware issue specific to that machine"
X Link 2024-01-12T15:16Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@bigcjat @ShortTheFOMO What testing would you have done to catch this issue The only thing I can think of is running dozens of machines on mainnet but some people don't want people spinning up nodes temporarily just for testing/experimentation. ()/"
X Link 2024-01-12T15:54Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@bigcjat @ShortTheFOMO I'm not talking about the UNL validator I'm talking about just spinning up other nodes and validators for testing. IIRC @ShortTheFOMO was one of those folks against people running nodes and validators just to test"
X Link 2024-01-12T15:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@daniel_wwf @Vet_X0 @bigcjat @ShortTheFOMO Feel free to conduct your own testing on rcs before they're released. You'll always have at least [--] weeks while it undergoes our release testing. This is a message to everyone complaining that we should have caught this. Independent testing solves the monoculture problem right"
X Link 2024-01-12T16:07Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@bigcjat @daniel_wwf @Vet_X0 @ShortTheFOMO Make up your mind lol I thought everyone who got money from Ripple was in their pocket and wasn't allowed to have other opinions. (This is sarcastic in case someone is confused)"
X Link 2024-01-12T16:15Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@bigcjat @Vet_X0 @daniel_wwf @ShortTheFOMO You're free to never upgrade your node if you don't trust Ripple's code"
X Link 2024-01-12T16:29Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@offledger @JoelKatz @ethanjames0394 @Meshinom You can do pretty much anything you want in an amendment"
X Link 2024-01-23T09:31Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Sputnik913 @offledger @JoelKatz @ethanjames0394 @Meshinom The price of XRP is based on supply and demand. I guess theoretically you could put a floor on the exchange rate of XRP in an amendment but a) that wouldn't affect CEXes and exchanges on other chains and b) that'd probably just mean no one would use XRP and you couldn't sell"
X Link 2024-01-23T10:43Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@offledger @JoelKatz @ethanjames0394 @Meshinom David's response agrees with this he just didn't specify that it had to be done with an amendment. If a majority of nodes and validators (and a supermajority of UNL validators) want to burn Ripple's escrow for some reason it'd be pretty easy to get such an amendment passed"
X Link 2024-01-23T11:09Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@offledger @JoelKatz @ethanjames0394 @Meshinom Of course we're discussing hypotheticals here. I said "if a majority of nodes and validators (and a supermajority of UNL validators) want to burn Ripple's escrow for some reason". I also agree this is not likely to happen"
X Link 2024-01-23T11:23Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@XRPoutsider @WietseWind @Shockwave_App @MarkUK16 @JoelKatz @HammerToe a) A Z-test doesn't work well on a small population (such as a group of [--] data points on one vote since you're not taking into account other amendments) b) A Z-test doesn't prove any collusion. It could also be showing that some people have similar levels of risk tolerance"
X Link 2024-01-24T07:34Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@XRPoutsider @WietseWind @Shockwave_App @MarkUK16 @JoelKatz @HammerToe Can you prove that previous amendment voting timelines tended to follow a normal distribution I doubt that that is true tbh just from anecdotal recollection. And regardless my second point still stands. A Z-test doesn't tell you anything about causal relationships"
X Link 2024-01-24T08:16Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@XRPoutsider @WietseWind @Shockwave_App @MarkUK16 @JoelKatz @HammerToe I'm not providing my doubt as evidence merely providing a hypothesis you can test. I did explain it btw. I told you it was due to validators having similar levels of risk tolerance for the network and looking for similar data (e.g. perf testing) before being satisfied"
X Link 2024-01-24T08:30Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Stirfry99 @XRPoutsider @WietseWind @Shockwave_App @MarkUK16 @JoelKatz @HammerToe I personally am confident that the AMM will be safe for the network. The low throughput was only when testing really complex paths which only happen 1% of the time. I may disagree with others on risk tolerance levels but they're not bad or evil for being extra cautious"
X Link 2024-01-24T08:39Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@adam_198934 Would love to hear any ideas you have for how it can catch up 🙂"
X Link 2024-01-25T11:28Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@adam_198934"
X Link 2024-01-25T11:45Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@offledger @WKahneman @Vet_X0 Isn't the whole objective of posting this publicly on a public forum so that the whole community can be consulted"
X Link 2024-01-26T07:59Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@offledger @WKahneman @Vet_X0 If that's what you want so be it. But it's not like Ripple can force it through. This was posted as a pre-proposal idea in the repo. There are still a lot of details to be worked out. If you have thoughts please comment on the GitHub discussion"
X Link 2024-01-26T08:22Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@scotty2ten "The revised Foundation needs to have a business model that solves that problem." That's one thing I liked about this proposal. Funding comes from a diverse group and anyone can contribute. Perhaps how we do that needs to be amended in the proposal but I like that ethos"
X Link 2024-01-27T09:06Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@scotty2ten "At present Ripple controls what code gets merged and voted on by validators." I just checked the repo and it looks like there are the same number of Ripplers as Foundation members in the list of current maintainers. Could you elaborate on your concern"
X Link 2024-01-27T09:08Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@sentosumosaba @realSologenic That's actually one thing I liked about the proposal: funding can come from diverse sources including from businesses running on the XRPL. If they want to have a say in whatever this organization is they need to pay - and some of those funds could be used for infra"
X Link 2024-01-28T09:03Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@ADingoAteMyXRP @WKahneman If Ripple is a corporate member it would have to go through a vote just like any other corporate member to be on the board. There are several other companies that could also be corporate members like XRPL Labs xrpcafe Sologenic etc. Ripple is just another community member"
X Link 2024-01-28T09:14Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Kirjakulov @sentosumosaba @realSologenic It's not about needing power it's about supporting the ecosystem which such a business will continue to rely on. Even massive companies like Google join such foundations (see"
X Link 2024-01-28T11:11Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Kirjakulov @sentosumosaba @realSologenic @xpmarket @Brit_blockchain What makes you doubt in any benefit"
X Link 2024-01-28T11:38Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Kirjakulov @sentosumosaba @realSologenic I hope the sliding scale suggested in the proposal helps make such a membership more affordable for XRPL projects. If you have other ideas please comment"
X Link 2024-01-28T11:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Kirjakulov @sentosumosaba @realSologenic @xpmarket @Brit_blockchain Based on this it seems like that's a problem this proposal was designed to help fix. Yesterday I published a proposal for updating the governance structure of the XRPL Foundation. Many have questioned my intentions and motivations. Please read more about both here: https://t.co/49S3y5cUb5 Yesterday I published a proposal for updating the governance structure of the XRPL Foundation. Many have questioned my intentions and motivations. Please read more about both here: https://t.co/49S3y5cUb5"
X Link 2024-01-28T11:53Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Kirjakulov @sentosumosaba @realSologenic @xpmarket @Brit_blockchain I'm sure any suggestions you have will be welcome. Here's my proposed solution to help with the money (c/o FOMO for the explanation): I would like to highlight the possibility of this XLS possibly having one of the most tremendous effects to the XRPL eco-system. Having the ability to charge a small fee for your interface makes so much possible for devs and businesses on the ledger. https://t.co/gV7LbSPiby I would like to highlight the possibility of this XLS possibly having one of the most tremendous effects to the XRPL"
X Link 2024-01-28T12:03Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@briangrobertson @sentosumosaba @realSologenic @Vet_X0 @alloynetworks @ShortTheFOMO Feel free to write up a proposal 🙂"
X Link 2024-01-28T14:40Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@briangrobertson @sentosumosaba @realSologenic @Vet_X0 @alloynetworks @ShortTheFOMO I recommend moving it to a separate discussion (perhaps a pre-proposal idea) since it's a bit unrelated to what you responded to"
X Link 2024-01-28T15:27Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@sentosumosaba @realSologenic I don't think there's a list or anything anywhere. I agree that'd be a great resource (though price probably varies a lot across the world). Perhaps @WietseWind can help bridge the gap here"
X Link 2024-01-29T12:23Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@stogiescigs @Vet_X0 @JoelKatz @Silkjaer @GVOCollective @MoonLamboio Separate issue. Many nodes and validators didn't upgrade to [---] because there was a bug introduced that made staying synced to the ledger more difficult. 2.0.1 fixes that issue so more operators should upgrade now. It just came out give them a few days 🙂"
X Link 2024-01-30T13:06Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Vet_X0 What was the issue I'm not familiar with that one"
X Link 2024-01-30T14:19Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO UNL validators can revoke their vote if they're worried about it I'm just sharing the opinion of one UNL validator"
X Link 2024-02-01T21:35Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@xMoonkie I don't think there's anything wrong with being a little extra cautious. I agree that it's perhaps overcautious but everyone is allowed to have their own level of risk tolerance and being overcautious doesn't mean that they have nefarious intent"
X Link 2024-02-07T13:38Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@krippenreiter @SchlaubiD @RoseXrp 100%. I had a lot of great conversations with people I ordinarily might not have gotten a chance to talk to. You can't convey sentiment nearly as well with words as you can with your voice facial expressions and body language. It's also harder to insult someone IRL 😜"
X Link 2024-02-07T15:03Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @daniel_wwf No algorithm can decide this. Different people will have different definitions of what is legitimate traffic vs spam (see: NFTs and inscriptions)"
X Link 2024-02-08T22:20Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@tequ @WKahneman I believe that was left out to simplify the transaction but could of course always be added in the future"
X Link 2024-02-09T23:58Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@angell_denis @Vet_X0 @SmolDev111 @Silkjaer There are thousands of EVM devs in the industry. The vast majority of multichain devs are EVM developers. Why should we not try to bring them into the ecosystem Especially as a sidechain"
X Link 2024-02-11T03:11Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@angell_denis @Vet_X0 @SmolDev111 @Silkjaer I'm not talking about Ripple's clients (that's not my area of responsibility) I'm talking about what I've heard from my own conversations with builders in the crypto industry - at conferences workshops etc"
X Link 2024-02-11T05:10Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@angell_denis @Vet_X0 @SmolDev111 @Silkjaer Given that we're talking about personal experiences here we might just have to agree to disagree on this one. We both have different hypotheses for how this will play out and only time will tell which one (if either) is accurate"
X Link 2024-02-11T05:31Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@illneil @hazardcookie @ShortTheFOMO @BiasGoose @WKahneman @Aptos_Network Isn't it the same with any USDC on the XRPL since none of it is Circle-issued"
X Link 2024-02-12T00:03Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @hazardcookie @BiasGoose @WKahneman @Aptos_Network So would you prefer it without the prefix"
X Link 2024-02-12T00:24Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @hazardcookie @BiasGoose @WKahneman @Aptos_Network IMO the prefix thing makes more sense in an ERC-20 world on the XRPL the issuer is enough of a differentiator"
X Link 2024-02-12T00:29Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @illneil @hazardcookie @BiasGoose @WKahneman @Aptos_Network I don't think that works"
X Link 2024-02-12T03:35Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@BiasGoose @hazardcookie @daniel_wwf @xrplapex @daniel_wwf does casinocoin support testnet XRP gambling"
X Link 2024-02-22T21:54Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@KhaledElawadi @tequ @OrchestraFi The whole purpose of the testnet is for "rummaging around on the XRPL" - I'd be surprised (and impressed) if you're able to break something. Also as I mentioned earlier @OrchestraFi does not require any coding knowledge"
X Link 2024-02-26T16:33Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Vet_X0 Pi day (almost) pi time 👀"
X Link 2024-02-29T16:03Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@XRPIntegrations @Vet_X0 It's chugging along - already [--] votes Faster than any other feature amendment I can think of 🤞🤞"
X Link 2024-02-29T16:08Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@daniel_wwf @ShortTheFOMO @Vet_X0 For those too lazy to Google translate I did it for you: Even blind chickens sometimes find grain"
X Link 2024-03-01T21:39Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@starclaw59 @Vet_X0 Hooks are not on the XRPL (at least as of now). They are on a separate network called Xahau"
X Link 2024-03-04T17:47Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@xspectDS @lionel42399 @_CryptoArsenal @JoelKatz @illneil @circle @Ripple @bgarlinghouse You're a bit behind on the latest hooks news it seems"
X Link 2024-03-15T17:52Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"I've seen a lot of hype about XLS-56d (atomic transactions) lately. So many interesting ideas flying around What excites you about atomic transactions on the XRP Ledger I'd love to hear your potential uses. Comment below"
X Link 2024-03-20T15:54Z [----] followers, 13.6K engagements

"@LoafPickle @xrpcafe What do you use them for on Algorand"
X Link 2024-03-20T17:48Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@LoafPickle @xrpcafe Just looking to solicit usecases from others because I'm not always able to think of all of them and maybe some of these ideas will spur other ones for folks reading this thread 🙂"
X Link 2024-03-20T17:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@RichardXRPL @JoelKatz I don't even think Ethereum had an AMM in [----] lol"
X Link 2024-03-22T21:59Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@angell_denis @WietseWind @daniel_wwf @Dizer_YM @GateHub I'm not opposed to adding an additional amendment but I'm not sure if this is desired"
X Link 2024-03-24T22:15Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@offledger @krippenreiter @angell_denis I recommend that you reserve judgment until the full bug report is out"
X Link 2024-03-27T22:32Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShortTheFOMO @tequ @ayang2294 I thought autobridging was only via XRP"
X Link 2024-03-28T02:53Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@tequ From what I understand that's kind of how Algorand operates so I don't see that as necessarily a bad thing"
X Link 2024-04-01T12:57Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@sentosumosaba @HugoPhilion I'm referring to the "check data" and "check validity" part of the diagram - I believe that still has the same data integrity issues as otherwise"
X Link 2024-04-05T18:55Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@offledger @easya_app @Ripple @RippleXDev "A sidechain is a separate independent blockchain linked to the main blockchain (mainchain) using a two-way bridge." https://crypto.com/university/what-are-sidechains-scaling-blockchain https://crypto.com/university/what-are-sidechains-scaling-blockchain"
X Link 2024-04-09T17:22Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@offledger @easya_app @Ripple @RippleXDev I recommend doing more research on what bridges look like across crypto. The locking-wrapping setup is how a lot of bridges work it's a common norm. Here's a link to get you started (note the section on "Wrapped Asset Bridges"): https://hacken.io/discover/blockchain-bridges/ https://hacken.io/discover/blockchain-bridges/"
X Link 2024-04-09T18:13Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@offledger @easya_app @Ripple @RippleXDev It's a two way bridge - you can move value back and forth. You can also lock assets on the EVM sidechain and get wrapped versions on the XRPL"
X Link 2024-04-09T18:35Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@offledger @easya_app @Ripple @RippleXDev It doesn't matter if a sidechain provides value to the mainchain in order for it to be a sidechain (IMO it does in this case but I don't think you care). You can have a derpy little sidechain that has literally no usecase if you want it's still a sidechain"
X Link 2024-04-09T18:37Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@offledger @easya_app @Ripple @RippleXDev I don't follow why you'd need to be able to create more XRP on the EVM sidechain for it to be a sidechain. That's not relevant at all"
X Link 2024-04-09T18:38Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@offledger @easya_app @Ripple @RippleXDev Here's a link to the spec I suggest you read through it before assuming things about it and making broad (and incorrect) claims based on those assumptions. https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/blob/master/XLS-0038d-cross-chain-bridge/README.md https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/blob/master/XLS-0038d-cross-chain-bridge/README.md"
X Link 2024-04-09T18:48Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@offledger @easya_app @Ripple @RippleXDev The benefit to XRP is utility - you can now use your XRP with EVM smart contracts. Voting isn't my responsibility I can't speak to that"
X Link 2024-04-09T19:55Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@WKahneman @krippenreiter @panosmek @AnodosFinance @OrchestraFi @xpmarket @dexfi_pro @realSologenic @tequ @MoaiFinance I'm lost. I don't understand this reference"
X Link 2024-04-14T20:53Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@JamesRayXRP I think you may be misunderstanding the issue the fix amendment solved. It didn't change anything about how single sided deposits affect pools it just fixed an issue where offers filled by the AMM weren't following the constant product invariant"
X Link 2024-04-15T06:43Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@WKahneman @krippenreiter @panosmek @AnodosFinance @OrchestraFi @xpmarket @dexfi_pro @realSologenic @tequ @MoaiFinance 😅"
X Link 2024-04-15T16:02Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@ekiserrepe @xMoonkie @Vet_X0 Isn't the same already true with regard to being able to clone smart contracts"
X Link 2024-04-19T23:33Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"For all those following along with XLS-56d I just published a huge update of the spec. One of the new features it enables: multi-account batches 👀 This will enable new use-cases like atomic swaps. https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/discussions/162 https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/discussions/162"
X Link 2024-04-22T19:21Z 13.3K followers, 65.3K engagements

"I'd love any and all feedback from the community on this spec - please comment if you have any"
X Link 2024-04-22T19:24Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@WKahneman Those are but a few of the possible use-cases - here is an additional list from @LoafPickle who was explaining how they're part of the backbone of the Algorand ecosystem. https://twitter.com/LoafPickle/status/1770518227635843414 @msvadari @xrpcafe Buying an NFT Swapping on a Dex Trading NFTs Buying a pack of NFTs Swapping asset [--] with a combo of assets [--] and [--] Splitting payments among team members Delegating fees so the end user doesn't pay Mass sending burning or minting Just to name a few that come to mind right away https://twitter.com/LoafPickle/status/1770518227635843414"
X Link 2024-04-22T20:05Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@MuseForge434 @spectrum108 @Vet_X0 That's basically how reserves work on the XRPL as well"
X Link 2024-04-28T20:38Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@MuseForge434 @spectrum108 @Vet_X0 That doesn't require an amendment. Fee voting is a separate process still done by the UNL but can be changed without requiring any amendment. This last happened around [----]. https://xrpl.org/blog/2021/reserves-lowered/ https://xrpl.org/blog/2021/reserves-lowered/"
X Link 2024-04-28T21:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@MuseForge434 @spectrum108 @Vet_X0 Either way [-----] SOL is worth about [---] XRP so it's not really a fair comparison to compare [--] SOL to [--] XRP"
X Link 2024-04-28T21:53Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@MuseForge434 @spectrum108 @Vet_X0 If the token worth goes up the reserves will almost certainly come down. No one wants a trustline to cost $60"
X Link 2024-04-28T22:02Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@CrypticMystic_3 @Vet_X0 This isn't possible for the following reasons: How do you determine what the exchange rate is And how do you ensure that no one can mess with it"
X Link 2024-04-28T22:54Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@RichardXRPL @xrpl365 @Vet_X0 They were lowered two and a half years ago and everyone freaked out about it due to the subsequent trustline craze. I don't know if they were causally related but a lot of people back then certainly thought so"
X Link 2024-04-28T23:23Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@RichardXRPL @uptownsaul @xrpl365 @Vet_X0 Now you're just being ridiculous. Nowhere did I suggest that Ripple wants to raise reserves - I don't speak for Ripple but personally I want to see reserves lowered"
X Link 2024-04-28T23:38Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@RichardXRPL @uptownsaul @xrpl365 @Vet_X0 Again no one said Ripple wanted to raise reserves. That would likely also introduce a whole host of legal issues I'm guessing (IANAL)"
X Link 2024-04-28T23:43Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@payidotemrx @Vet_X0 The stablecoin isn't XRP"
X Link 2024-05-02T12:32Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"Just dropped: A new spec for sponsored XRPL transaction fees/reserves which would allow platforms to pay transaction fees/reserves on behalf of other accounts without needing to give away free XRP. This makes it way easier to onboard onto the XRPL 🔥 https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/discussions/196 https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/discussions/196"
X Link 2024-05-02T13:31Z 13.3K followers, 67.9K engagements

"@spectrum108 @MuseForge434 @Degen_Times @RudeBoyCrypto The voting is always going to be skewed regardless of if it's on Twitter or on-chain as infra providers are the ones who have to bear the cost of lowering reserves and most account holders don't care about the cost to the network"
X Link 2024-05-03T13:38Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@xTweetXRPL @daniel_wwf I'm not really understanding the flow here or why this is necessary when there are plenty of other ways to establish verification of accounts some of which are already used in practice (such as the Xaman KYC badge)"
X Link 2024-05-03T18:32Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@krippenreiter @HatLord You will also be able to do this via Axelar"
X Link 2024-05-06T10:23Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@tequ @krippenreiter @Jeevz211 I don't like the use of a new flag for something that is entirely unused for core ledger functionality and can be addressed with a memo"
X Link 2024-05-06T15:00Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@MichaelFen1619 @xspectDS @Vet_X0 @somethin2fierce I don't care what she does or what she posts (it's her choice) and I don't care what you do or who you ogle in private. I just don't want to see all of this misogyny from you on my feed. This is the kind of behavior that makes it difficult to get more women into crypto"
X Link 2024-05-07T22:43Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@BaZ_XRP @Vet_X0 Yes"
X Link 2024-05-08T19:03Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Lordeaux577 @WietseWind @TheBlock__ It really depends on your exact risk profile. If you're not worried about losing your seed phrase and you're worried about people hunting down your friends don't use it. If you want the safety of a decentralized "forgot my password" button (maybe you're newer to crypto) use it"
X Link 2024-05-09T21:08Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@daniel_wwf I know the feeling - the same thing happened to me with the eclipse (I was also in Spain 😅)"
X Link 2024-05-10T22:24Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Vet_X0 @BCBacker The Ethereum Foundation has one that's very similar as well: https://ethereum.org/en/community/code-of-conduct/ https://ethereum.org/en/community/code-of-conduct/"
X Link 2024-05-13T18:15Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@sentosumosaba How should one member be determined https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack"
X Link 2024-05-14T18:23Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@sentosumosaba Would a blockchain community be willing to go through an inherently centralized KYC process for this though It feels rather against the general ethos of crypto in some ways"
X Link 2024-05-14T18:38Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Santiag78758327 @sentosumosaba I'm not referring to the government credentials themselves but the process of checking them usually done by some trusted third-party. Who decides which third-parties are trusted for this decentralized governance process"
X Link 2024-05-14T21:37Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@CryptoLWJ Are the bags also indestructible"
X Link 2024-05-17T13:12Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@krippenreiter @WKahneman @XRPLLabs If you only want to receive XRP you could always just set up an account that doesn't have any trustlines"
X Link 2024-05-17T20:48Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@angell_denis Thanks for the detailed summary Denis. @WietseWind and a couple others also noticed an issue with the rippling setup on the issuer/hot wallet"
X Link 2024-05-19T14:19Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@AverageJohnXRP @IamMich18309052 @Vet_X0 @XrplDaddy @Kirjakulov @xpmarket Rippling wasn't the issue that was a misdiagnosis"
X Link 2024-05-19T18:34Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Vet_X0 It wouldn't even show the customer ID. The DID is equivalent to a fingerprint or something it doesn't mean anything on its own and everyone has one. The KYC company can just link to the DID more easily than e.g. your separate accounts across different chains"
X Link 2024-05-20T17:05Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Vet_X0 DIDs have no counterparty. You'd need a separate credential for the counterparty's data. With just the DID you wouldn't know which KYC company to ask or even if the account is KYC'd"
X Link 2024-05-20T17:18Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Vet_X0 No you'd want the attestation separately (not a part of the DID object). The DID object itself is counterparty-free and not KYC-specific"
X Link 2024-05-20T17:37Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@panosmek @AnodosFinance I'm not talking about the words they used I'm talking about the content as a whole. The judges have to go through a lot of applications they can't spend hours poring over each one (and I think it's unreasonable to expect that) - they have to take the application at face value"
X Link 2024-05-21T20:57Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@panosmek @AnodosFinance The grant program isn't a VC fund they're not just evaluating the idea. They're also evaluating the initial and planned execution. "To me ideas are worth nothing unless executed. They are just a multiplier. Execution is worth millions." - Steve Jobs"
X Link 2024-05-21T21:01Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@MetaMan_X @xrpl365 @JoelKatz Who's "you guys""
X Link 2024-05-23T20:53Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@MetaMan_X @xrpl365 @JoelKatz I think there are enough other players in the ecosystem working on wallets - @XummWallet @crossmarkio @gemwallet_app. If they don't satisfy the level of decentralization you're looking for then feel free to create a new one 😉"
X Link 2024-05-23T20:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@MetaMan_X @xrpl365 @JoelKatz @XummWallet @crossmarkio @gemwallet_app Unfortunately neither you nor I set the roadmap of Ripple 😉 - besides why step on the toes of the awesome developers that are already working on solving these problems https://x.com/crossmarkio/status/1793748527568568435 @MetaMan_X @msvadari @xrpl365 @JoelKatz @XummWallet @gemwallet_app ✋ decentralized and free https://x.com/crossmarkio/status/1793748527568568435 @MetaMan_X @msvadari @xrpl365 @JoelKatz @XummWallet @gemwallet_app ✋ decentralized and free"
X Link 2024-05-23T21:00Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@XRPLWin @SchlaubiD There's a couple of services that do the equivalent of UNLReport: https://github.com/xrpscan/hermes https://github.com/ripple/validator-history-service/ https://github.com/xrpscan/hermes https://github.com/ripple/validator-history-service/"
X Link 2024-05-24T15:51Z 11.2K followers, [--] engagements

"@intelliot and I just published a new spec for a rippled method that will allow users to preview or dry-run transactions without actually executing them. This is a game-changer for devs - they will be able to test out transactions much more easily and without risking funds or needing to replicate the entire system in a testnet. https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/discussions/199 https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/discussions/199"
X Link 2024-06-03T19:00Z [----] followers, 30.7K engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing