[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@moonshiesty moon shiesty

moon shiesty posts on X about hyperliquidx, $23m, $653m, the only the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXX #

• X Week XXXXX +686%
• X Month XXXXXX -XX%
• X Months XXXXXXX -XX%
• X Year XXXXXXXXX +231%

Mentions: X #

• X Months XXX -XXXX%
• X Year XXX +64%

Followers: XXXXX #

• X Week XXXXX +0.09%
• X Month XXXXX no change
• X Months XXXXX +13%
• X Year XXXXX +134%

CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #

Social Influence

Social category influence finance

Social topic influence hyperliquidx, $23m, $653m, the only, 23m, closed, $210b, $8343m, profitable, fud

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"hard to understand how we got from a $23M deficit covered by ADL to "$653M lost" there are a lot of good points brought up by this research but the only fair way to present what happened on 10/10 on @HyperliquidX is that 23M was haircut from the profitable traders - the 834m of realized PnL of closed positions was not "lost" ADL for a participant trading on a single exchange is very likely to lower their risk. for most users only trading on hyperliquid on 10/10 ADL closed their shorts at the market bottom and by ranking ADL by most profitable positions you almost always going to overshoot"
X Link 2025-12-11T00:11Z 4503 followers, 1016 engagements

"(i never fud)"
X Link 2025-12-10T18:08Z 4503 followers, XXX engagements

"@ConejoCapital @HyperliquidX agreed at a minimum i think exchanges should follow @Lighter_xyz zero price approach which doesn't deleverage positions which would decrease health"
X Link 2025-12-11T01:05Z 4503 followers, XXX engagements