[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@lightinrepose Avatar @lightinrepose lightinrepose

lightinrepose posts on X about to the, frame, where is, ngmi the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: X #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence finance countries

Social topic influence to the, frame, where is, ngmi, all the, holy see

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Perhaps your intellect has been darkened by forces unseen but Chieti addressing all of these things (already granted) within the context of phenomenology does not ipso facto make it some magisterial document. That is what you fail to grasp. The nature of the documents. They are not teaching documents which is the subject of LG25. You are far beyond your depth here"
X Link 2025-12-10T23:17Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"(1) Not contradicting myself; (2) This is not necessarily actually; (3) I think you need to learn to read; (4) This is not correct actually; (5) It does not explicitly frame the Commissions work as anything other than the works of said Commission you are making things up; (6) I really dont believe you have read any of these documents yourself else youd not be making these embarrassing errors; (7) No one said otherwise and thats not whats happening here. The reality is you want to zero in on Chieti because you think Paragraph XX says or implies something it does not. There is no contradiction"
X Link 2025-12-11T19:04Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"You can keep repeating this until your face turns purple but it doesnt make it so. You have failed on every front in this discussion and only pride married to a view you cant even articulate prevents you from seeing that. We have established - One the nature of the documents. - Two is the fact that there is no in your own words explicit approbation of the documents as teaching. - Three that the premise would automatically include all of the Commissions work. - Four that these in no way bring about conflict with Catholics even if we granted the premise to begin with. Your only response to"
X Link 2025-12-11T20:03Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"And the 2025 Nicene anniversary document explicitly frames the Joint Commissions dialogues as contributing to the Holy Sees ecclesiological teaching mission. This is literally not true for example. Where is EXPLICIT FRAMING of the Commissions dialogues as contributing to the Holy Sees ecclesiological teaching mission It doesnt. You are making stuff up lol"
X Link 2025-12-11T19:06Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"Do you not understand what the word explicit means Of COURSE Im going to rightfully demand explicit wording of what you are asserting is explicitly stated. Thats what the WORD means. Youre ngmi man"
X Link 2025-12-11T19:37Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"You have not established your fact and in fact (lol) have conceded that you do not have explicit adoption of these documents as teaching. Explicit was your word not mine. And then you gripe about demanding such which any normal person would do. Second the claim that Vatican II states that anything specifically endorsed by the Pope suddenly becomes magisterial. This is false. For example if he endorsed the teaching value of Sesame Street it would not automatically make Sesame Street magisterial. That isnt how it works and literally no one believes this least of all the people who wrote and"
X Link 2025-12-11T20:18Z XXX followers, XXX engagements