[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@kimkep4796 Avatar @kimkep4796 KKep

KKep posts on X about $mmat, $mmtlp, $trch, $nbh the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence technology brands XXXX% exchanges XXXX%

Social topic influence $mmat #2, $mmtlp #10, $trch #4, $nbh #1, ultra 9.09%, lee #3703, ai 2.27%, core 2.27%, what is 2.27%, preserve XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @kshaughnessy2 @finrarobbedme @palikaras @hooferik10986 @nasdaq @ctv @bnnbloomberg @johnbrda @zsaeed @finra_robbed_me @rd_squash @seamoore14 @flyeaglesfly529 @daviddi49963202 @geeprince2020 @bradleyjbirnie @us247365_2 @cdale_dog @mikeybbacon

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"$MMTLP $MMAT"
X Link 2025-12-02T01:39Z 2366 followers, 1115 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT @FINRA_Robbed_Me ⚖ WILLIAM KELLY v FINRA (An AI Review - NLA - Part X of 2) X. Is Kellys Second Amended Complaint enough to plausibly allege that FINRA acted ultra vires Short answer: YES at the pleading stage it likely is enough. But enough to allege enough to win. Why Because the SAC does what the judge essentially told him to do: ✔ Identifies specific actions FINRA allegedly had no statutory authority to perform Kelly alleges FINRA: Altered issuer-level corporate action data Imposed a U3 halt without SEC approval Deleted a security from the marketplace Obstructed SHO"
X Link 2025-11-20T10:44Z 2368 followers, 18.3K engagements

"$MMAT $MMTLP ⚖Kelly v. FINRA Case No. 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA 📅 FINRA Reply filed: Dec X 2025 📅 Kelly Sur-Reply + Motion for Leave filed: Dec X 2025 🔥 Kelly just responded to FINRA and he caught them adding NEW arguments & NEW documents at the last minute. 💥 FINRA tried to claim Kelly admitted a 1:1 distribution 💥 FINRA slipped in a NEW Rule 11(b)(3) accusation 💥 FINRA added NEW rules & filings NOT in their original request 💥 FINRA wants a press release treated as fact even though its disputed ⚖ Kellys message to the Court: FINRA changed the story in their Reply. I deserve a chance to"
X Link 2025-12-09T02:07Z 2368 followers, 5316 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH Filed 12/11/25 ⚖William Lee Kelly v FINRA The volleying back & forth continues🎾 FINRA just filed an opposition to Kellys request to file a sur-reply. 🔹 FINRA says sur-replies are highly discouraged 🔹 Claims they didnt raise any new arguments 🔹 Says the 1-for-1 NBH distribution + FINRA rules were already cited 🔹 Adds Kelly doesnt dispute the rules they want judicially noticed 🔹 Argues Rule 11(b)(3) reminder wasnt new just a warning 💥 FINRAs bottom line: Kellys motion has no merit and should be denied. 🎾 And the volley continues"
X Link 2025-12-11T21:22Z 2371 followers, 3057 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH ⚖ Update: Kelly v. FINRA Nevada (2:25-cv-01195) No new docket activity yet. Were now waiting on FINRAs response to William Kellys Second Amended Complaint followed by a ruling from the judge. Kellys core argument: FINRAs actions surrounding the MMTLP halt were ultra vires meaning FINRA exceeded its legal authority under the Exchange Act by implementing and enforcing actions not authorized by statute or rule violating limits set by 15A(b)(6) Reg SHO Rule 15c2-11 Rule 17a-4 and 10b-5. This case could define the boundaries of SRO immunity and accountability. More to come once"
X Link 2025-11-14T17:30Z 2367 followers, 3667 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH ⚖Kelly v. FINRA Case No. 2:25-cv-01195 (D. Nevada) What is Kelly actually asking for In plain English he wants the court to force FINRA to: 🔹 Admit they mishandled MMTLP including the corporate-action notices & the 12/9/22 halt. 🔹 Declare that investors rights were violated. 🔹 Release & preserve ALL MMTLP records trading data blue sheets internal messages corporate-action files. 🔹 Stop altering corporate-action data without oversight & add safeguards before future halts. Bottom line: Kelly wants transparency accountability and a ruling that FINRAs MMTLP actions were"
X Link 2025-11-20T20:08Z 2367 followers, 2630 engagements

"$MMAT $MMTLP $TRCH 🔥Attorney Billing Summary and Detailed Summary Exhibits from the Trustees Counsel: approximately $XXX million paid to creditors with (sic) XX days of the petition and as much as $XXX million WHICH APPEARS TO HAVE BENEFITTED INSIDERS (emphasis added) during the one year period prior to the petition.the implication for voidable transfer analysis is apparent"
X Link 2025-11-21T19:11Z 2368 followers, 7497 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH ⚖UPDATE as of 11/22/2025⚖ ⚖ KELLY v FINRA (see 🧵 thread below) KELLY responds: Big Picture: Kelly is telling the judge: Im fine with you looking at some of FINRAs documents but you **cant treat disputed spin-off successfully completed language or vague unnamed FINRA rules as if theyre proven facts"
X Link 2025-11-22T17:01Z 2367 followers, 6248 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH Kelly v. FINRA Case No. 2:25-cv-01195 (11/22/2025) @FINRA_Robbed_Me 🔥✨ Will there be a positive outcome for victim investors Potential scenario below: Judge Gordon is likely to grant judicial notice of FINRAs documents only for their existence not as proof that the MMTLP spin-off successfully completed. That claim is disputed and directly contradicted by evidence so it cant be treated as fact. FINRAs vague request to notice various rules and filings will almost certainly be denied. 💥 Bottom line: FINRA probably wont get a full dismissal. The case is expected to survive in"
X Link 2025-11-22T17:14Z 2367 followers, 2515 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH @FINRA_Robbed_Me UPDATE: 11/23/2025 ⚖Kelly v. FINRA (D. Nev. 2:25-cv-01195) FINRA just filed a SUNDAY proposed order + extension after Kellys latest brief a sign his arguments hit enough pressure points that FINRAs scrambling to control timing and narrative. Judge is engaged case is alive and SRO immunity is officially on the hot seat. 🔥⚖📉🧩 FINRA filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Time - Reply expected between 11/28/25 - 12/5/25"
X Link 2025-11-23T21:20Z 2367 followers, 13.7K engagements

"🚨 $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH Kelly v FINRA Update 🚨 @FINRA_Robbed_Me Both sides just agreed to extend FINRAs deadline to Dec X 2025 the exact date FINRA fraud chief Sam Draddy told the SEC they were blue-sheeting MMTLP/MMAT on 12/5/2022. Three years apart. Same date. From secret blue sheets ➜ federal court accountability. Heres why this moment is HUGE👇 ⚖ Ultra vires = beyond their legal authority. If the judge finds FINRA exceeded the powers Congress gave it during the MMTLP halt then: FINRAs actions are not shielded Immunity falls apart The court can review and rule on what they did 🔥 FINRA"
X Link 2025-11-28T16:49Z 2367 followers, 27.5K engagements

"$MMTLP $TRCH $NBH 🚨 Whats a Rule XXX Petition Its a formal request asking the SEC to take agency action issue a rule fix a process or step in when current rules are failing investors. ANY citizen can file one and the SEC must review it. 📬 Today I sent the SEC (via email & overnight mail) a new Rule XXX Petition demanding emergency rulemaking to protect MMTLP-related FOIA records from being destroyed. Heres the issue The SEC keeps placing MMTLP FOIA requests on the Complex Track meaning they wont even look at them for X years. But the SECs own record-retention periods expire long before that"
X Link 2025-12-01T23:10Z 2367 followers, 18.7K engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH 📬✨ Quick fact for investors: SEC Rule XXX petitions are handled ONLY by SEC staff not contractors. Your XXX petition goes: X Office of the Secretary (SEC employees) X Routed to SEC divisions & attorneys X Reviewed internally X Decided by the Commissioners themselves 💥➡ No FOIA contractors. No outsourced reviewers.💥 Real SEC staff. Real accountability. 💥 $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH 🚀🔍"
X Link 2025-12-02T00:57Z 2367 followers, 3698 engagements

"Prior thread in one post 🔥🔥🔥 $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH ⚖Case 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA Kelly v. FINRA (Laymans Terms) Below is what Kelly just filed his Opposition to FINRAs Motion to Dismiss broken down for regular investors 👇 🔥 What This Filing Says (In Plain English) X FINRA Went Outside Its Legal Authority (Ultra Vires) 🚫 FINRA changed the MMTLP corporate-action data on Dec X 2022 without legal authority 🚫 FINRA then issued a nationwide U3 halt with no SEC order 🚫 FINRA made it permanent by tying the halt to the deletion of the ticker ⚠ Courts say SRO immunity does not apply when an"
X Link 2025-12-03T23:10Z 2367 followers, 3287 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH How might the case proceed ✅ Has Kelly Presented Enough for the Case to Proceed Short answer: Yes he has presented more than enough to survive a Motion to Dismiss. Heres why: X At the Motion-to-Dismiss stage the judge must assume Kellys facts are TRUE Under the law (Twombly Iqbal) the Court must: Accept all well-pled allegations as true Draw all reasonable inferences in Kellys favor Only dismiss if no legal claim is possible even assuming hes right Kellys Opposition: ✔ Clearly identifies ultra vires (outside authority) actions ✔ Cites multiple appellate cases limiting"
X Link 2025-12-03T23:22Z 2367 followers, 7111 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH ⚖William Lee Kelly (Scipio) below regarding his case against FINRA"
X Link 2025-12-04T18:38Z 2369 followers, 3701 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH WILLIAM LEE KELLY V FINRA 12/05/2025 What FINRA Just Told the Court 👀⚖🔥 Laymans terms breakdown of FINRAs latest filing (Doc 57): 💥 What FINRA Is Doing FINRA just filed a reply telling the judge: Kellys objections dont matter accept ALL our documents as facts. 📌 Key Points (Simple Terms) 🔹 FINRA Point #1 The 1-for-1 NBH Distribution Is Not Up for Debate FINRA wants the court to judicially notice (officially recognize) a Next Bridge press release saying MMTLP holders got X NBH share for each MMTLP share on 12/14/24. Kelly argued the distribution is disputed. FINRA"
X Link 2025-12-08T22:28Z 2369 followers, 3651 engagements

"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH Case 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA Kelly v. FINRA (Laymans Terms) Below is what Kelly just filed his Opposition to FINRAs Motion to Dismiss broken down for regular investors 👇 (thread below)"
X Link 2025-12-03T21:57Z 2367 followers, 4961 engagements

"@palikaras @zsaeed 💥Palikaras 12/08/2025💥 $MMAT #FAFO"
X Link 2025-12-08T23:10Z 2368 followers, 2504 engagements

"🚨 $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH FINRA isnt fighting William Kelly alone theyve hired very expensive lawyers to stop this case. 💼 Faegre Drinker (BigLaw) Partner John Mitchell: $950$1150/hr Firm blended rate: $650$950/hr 💼 EPG Law Group (Local Counsel) Elias George: $425$575/hr 💰 Estimated payout to FINRAs law firms: $200k$500k if dismissed early $600k$1.8M if discovery opens $3M+ if it reaches trial ➡ FINRA is spending seven figures to stop this case from moving forward. ➡ Retail isnt the only one with something at stake here. #KellyvFINRA #FINRA #SROs #TransparencyNow"
X Link 2025-12-11T23:25Z 2370 followers, XXX engagements

"💥MORE GOOD NEWS💥 $MMAT Court filing update (12/11/2025 In re: Meta Materials Inc. SDNY Case 25-MC-453) 🧾 What just happened (in plain English): Nasdaq asked a New York federal court to block subpoenas related to Meta Materials The judge held a hearing on Dec XX 2025 On Dec XX 2025 the judge said: This doesnt belong here. 👉 Instead of deciding whether Nasdaq can dodge the subpoenas the judge sent the entire dispute to the Nevada Bankruptcy Court where Meta Materials bankruptcy is already pending. ⚖ Why this matters: Nasdaq does NOT get a free pass from a NY court The fight over subpoenas"
X Link 2025-12-12T20:34Z 2371 followers, 1455 engagements