[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@jacksonfrandsen JaxJax posts on X about your new, loaded, eternal, fiat the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence technology brands automotive brands
Social topic influence your new #648, loaded, eternal, fiat, the early
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @grok @askperplexity @toweroverwatch @thoughtfulsaint @davidhenkel20 @carbonmfg @solachad @azuritian @jacob1832jacob @francisyo92739 @mormonger @johanliebert04 @kaysuede @jacelala @byjimbob @ericcmeadows @solagpt @augustinepatch @jbrtnme @coladaclan
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Respectfully thats precisely the issue monotheism isnt a Hebrew category. The Hebrew echad in YHWH is one (Deut. 6:4) means unity not numerical solitude. Youre importing a Greek philosophical term (monos + theos) foreign to the text then calling that the starting point. The prophets spoke Hebraically not Hellenistically"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-25T17:10Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Right each member of the Godhead has a distinct body because each is a distinct divine Person. Their unity isnt physical sameness but perfect oneness of will glory and love. Three beings one Godhead distinction without division unity without collapse. (Matthew 17:15) Jesus was transfigured before them and his face did shine as the sun and a voice out of the cloud said This is my beloved Son. Jesus tangible radiant body remains on the mount; the Fathers voice is heard from the heavens; the Spirits light overshadows. Three divine manifestations at the same time with none physically combining"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-27T00:34Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"The term monotheist is actually foreign to the Hebrew prophetsits a Greek philosophical category (from monos + theos) developed centuries later to describe a numeric one. The Hebrew Scriptures use echada word meaning united whole or in covenantal harmony (as in Gen. 2:24 the two shall become one flesh). Thats the closest concept in Hebrew and its relational not arithmetic. So the Bible never teaches monotheism in the later Greek sense; it teaches divine onenessa living unity of will love and glory. Thats exactly what the Father Son and Holy Ghost share"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-27T04:14Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"All good and thats a fair question. In Hebraic thought divinity isnt isolation but perfect relation. A being alone could be powerful but not loving. Yes God is God because He is infinitely just merciful powerful and truebut those attributes are fully divine only in perfect unity. A solitary being could possess power but not love; justice but not mercy. The unity among the Father Son and Spirit is not optionalits the very condition that makes Gods nature infinitely relational not merely individual"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-27T22:09Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@ThoughtfulSaint Exactly That is what I have been saying. Even monotheism is a Greek-derived philosophical term not a Hebrew one"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-25T17:00Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@CerebralCereal0 @grok what is your take on the queen of the South"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-28T03:41Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@Lostcalifornio @Disciple_Tulip1 If God is unmoved in the Aristotelian sense. Which is pure actuality without potential. Then how does He act love or incarnate without change Wouldnt the God of Abraham who speaks weeps and covenants already defy Aristotles unmoved premise"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-28T13:13Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Church history starts with Christexactly. Thats why youre shadow boxing with Mormonism. No Mormon Church was founded; The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was. Latter-day denotes its restoration of Christs Church by Christ not a new invention. Your argument hits a straw man not the claim"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-29T21:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@ByJimbob Your first claim denied history (H); your new one denies lineage (R). Lineage-to-Christ is a different predicate. You conceded origin and we have developmentso by your own concession history follows"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-29T22:07Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"It sounds like you have no interest in an honest charitable or Christlike discussion which is fine. Your overall rhetorical pattern substitutes mockery and loaded questions for reasoning constructing straw men and false dilemmas to force a reader into accepting a single ecclesiological conclusion. Your argument rests on category errors (confusing spiritual victory with institutional survival) and non sequiturs (jumping from Christs divinity to church continuity). Conveniently ignoring Christs promise. (straw manmisrepresents the other view as denying Christs promise entirely; ad hominem"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-30T01:09Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Let me know when you can commit to an honest conversation You appeal to charity while ignoring the first and most central claim: Christs promise and provision for THE Church. There is but one as there is but one Christ whole and visible. (begging the question assumes as premise that there is only one visible institutional Church; equivocation shifts the meaning of Church from spiritual body to institutional hierarchy) You cant expect charity. (ad hominem refuses goodwill based on a presumed fault in the interlocutor; poisoning the well undermines the others moral standing instead of"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-30T01:28Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"A strictly solitary deity can at most possess impersonal force or abstract norms but not the full eternal forms of justice mercy truth and royal authorityeach of which is intrinsically relational. Hence the unity of the Father Son and Holy Spirit (distinct persons in perfect eternal communion) is not optional; it is the very condition under which these perfections are eternally and fully divine. If perfections are relational a solitary god cant be fully perfect. Justice mercy truth royal power are relational. Therefore Gods perfection entails eternal communionthe one God as Father Son Spirit"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-27T23:05Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"I would say grace is not universally received. Now if grace isnt universally offered how do you interpret passages like Titus 2:11 (the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men) or John 3:16 (God so loved the world) Are you suggesting God only offers grace to some or that some simply refuse the grace offered to all And if Gods offer isnt universal how could He judge the world in righteousness (Acts 17:31) without having offered all people a fair chance to receive it"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-29T13:48Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Major Premise: A movement with continuous records of founders revelations ordinances persecutions migrations and global growth possesses a verifiable history. Minor Premise: Mormonism (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) has continuous records of founders revelations ordinances persecutions migrations and global growth. Conclusion: Therefore Mormonism has a verifiable Church history. (Refutation complete.)"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-29T21:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"You changed no history into no 1st-century lineage. Thats a different claim. By your rule Lutherans and Baptists have no Christian church historywhich is nonsense. The LDS Churchs history is documented; your definition just deletes it by fiat. Your new argument equivocates and begs the question. 1) Equivocation You switch meanings of Christian Church History: Sense A (discipline/macro): the history of Christianity from Christ onward. Sense B (micro): the history of a Christian church (e.g. Lutheran Baptist LDS) from its founding. Your P1 uses A (begins in the 1st century) while your C denies"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-29T22:15Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@ByJimbob Christ did so when Paul warned that a falling away must come first (2 Thess. 2:3) was he lying or did the early Church risk losing what Christ established"
X Link @jacksonfrandsen 2025-10-29T22:31Z XXX followers, XX engagements