@cabsav456 Lauren

Lauren posts on X about maga, doj, in the, money the most. They currently have [-------] followers and [----] posts still getting attention that total [----------] engagements in the last [--] hours.

Engagements: [----------] #

Mentions: [---] #

Followers: [-------] #

CreatorRank: [------] #

Social Influence

Social category influence finance countries celebrities technology brands social networks travel destinations ufc stocks automotive brands ncaa football

Social topic influence maga, doj #877, in the, money, donald trump #7036, white house #1120, if you, epstein files, tariffs #1427, this is

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @grok @nicksortor @mrddmia @bennyjohnson @repthomasmassie @ericldaugh @savvygcali @juliekelly2 @bdbsocal @fissilefinance @potus @bonchieredstate @jdvance @repluna @agpambondi @mattwalshblog @kyledcheney @triciaohio @scottjenningsky @realdonaldtrump

Top assets mentioned FilesCoins Power Cu (FILECOIN) PSYOP (PSYOP)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"@garyseaton55 @HawleyMO Chip Roy is also right to be a huge no on this atrocious big beautiful bill for all of the reasons hes laid out"
X Link 2025-05-20T15:56Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@RickyLMatthews @PolkaThom @unusual_whales He didnt vote to raise it. He voted to suspend it so that we wouldnt default. The BBB calls for raising the debt ceiling $5 trillion and nearly all of it will be IMMEDIATELY borrowed to fund the tax cuts and all the ICE/border shit. Then fingers crossed to make it back up"
X Link 2025-07-02T18:32Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@RealDaxWinters @PolkaThom @unusual_whales Massie is for the tax cuts and voted for them in [----] as well. If it was just the tax cuts he would vote yes. The tax cuts also arent expiring until end of [----]. There is no rush to push through a shit bill"
X Link 2025-07-02T18:34Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@RickyLMatthews @PolkaThom @unusual_whales IMO its just a horrible bill. No democrats will vote for it because of the Medicaid cuts and tax cuts mostly benefiting the 400k plus group. But if republicans have the balls in the current MAGA cult environment to vote against it maybe we should listen to why. It sucks"
X Link 2025-07-02T20:31Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@RickyLMatthews @Sandra0410S @PolkaThom @unusual_whales And you trust that That has not been the messaging coming from the White House. Theyre saying they already delivered no tax on SS. Theyre just assuming people are stupid and are definitely not going to work on this in the future"
X Link 2025-07-03T20:13Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@RickyLMatthews @Sandra0410S @PolkaThom @unusual_whales Republicans have the majority & should be able to pass a republican bill. Everyone is for the tax cuts. Its all the other shit that is a problem for a LOT of republicans many just too scared to say anything. MAGA is not the Republican Party. MAGA should work with republicans"
X Link 2025-07-03T20:23Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@CombatEngDC Apparently the mass deportations are coming They just need $100 billion to do what every previous president was able to do with way less money. The deportation numbers are pathetic and theyre not even trying to target the criminals first anymore. Ridiculous"
X Link 2025-07-03T20:39Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@BrettMills12 @DC_Draino Nope MAGA bots only"
X Link 2025-07-04T06:11Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@johncardillo Trump and his people knew what they were doing talking about the Epstein client list and have been hyping up massive deep state/democrat arrests for years creating massive distrust & divisiveness & it was all just to get him elected. They own this"
X Link 2025-07-09T05:24Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@johncardillo @DMRacing53 @RonColeman Youre missing the fact that Trump won on conspiracy theories w/ the stolen election J6 being an inside job promised high-profile arrests etc. MAGA has ruined the credibility of the Republican Party & unless people start standing on principle (ex Massie) were going to lose"
X Link 2025-07-09T05:32Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@johncardillo There are clearly many people that believed QAnon. Trump handpicked his FBI/DOJ all ppl who echoed these conspiracy theories. MAGA demands arrests due to mistrust & belief in the deep state controlling everything. Trump ruined the Republican Party & idk if well get it back"
X Link 2025-07-09T15:30Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@bennyjohnson The files were destroyed under Biden. Yeah OK. Trump who will literally go scorched earth on people within his own party for any hint of skepticism/disloyalty would have DEFINITELY said this himself & instructed Pam Bondi to do so as well. Instead its STFU let it go"
X Link 2025-07-10T22:14Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Firehawke @realDaveReilly Lmao. Trump who will literally go scorched earth on people within his own party for any hint of skepticism/disloyalty would have DEFINITELY said this himself. Also Biden kept the same FBI director appointed by Trump. MAGA looks so stupid making excuses for Trump"
X Link 2025-07-10T23:51Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@TPV_John I need to know if youve seen this based on everything youve been posting This paragraph is buried into a random memo from Pam Bondi"
X Link 2025-07-11T03:57Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@JustTheTweets17 I have to ask if youve seen this: one of Trumps first EOs signed. Its to PAUSE ALL investigations by the FCPA which was founded (with massive bipartisan support) after Watergate after massive foreign political corruption was found. It has never once been paused since 1977"
X Link 2025-07-11T04:21Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@jules4u11 @Pro__Trading So what about every normal person who voted Republican that speaks out against something Trump says or does Theyre controlled by the deep state How Lol MAGA is lookin more and more culty by the day"
X Link 2025-07-11T05:40Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@mitchellvii Youre acting like Epstein is like praying for the truth to come out about JFK when all the witnesses are dead & were [--] years out with 10+ presidents in the White House since. Trump & his DOJ/FBI talked about this nonstop pre-Trump [---]. Now theyre telling everyone STFU K"
X Link 2025-07-11T06:23Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@BridgetteOnX @TheChiefNerd @andrewschulz Wtf is the strategy The White House acts like the BBB massively cut spending & are pushing for this one tiny rescission bill to be passed. Theyre not promising more & are hoping people are too dumb to realize they are not going to actually cut spending. But do tell"
X Link 2025-07-11T14:17Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@UnsilntPatriot Its staggering. Trump/DOJ/FBI didnt even give a reason for the case to be closed & acted like the reporter was insane for even asking about it. MAGA is spewing theories justifying why when the White House is literally not saying shit about why. But transparency president lol"
X Link 2025-07-11T17:14Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@LiquidCryptid @realtimsharp @mmpadellan Idk maybe same way you put tariffs on an island/country that has [--] human population PS we do still trade with Russia"
X Link 2025-07-11T18:48Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@LiquidCryptid @realtimsharp @mmpadellan Last time I checked Antarctica doesnt have a human population. $550 million yearly is not zero trade with Russia. Idc how little it is. Sanction TF out of them and stop threatening it for [--] months. We look dumb doing that and it accomplishes nothing"
X Link 2025-07-11T19:03Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@JustAllowItAll @plutacup @SpencerHakimian $3.5 billion a year is not zero trade with Russia. They are notably and weirdly exempt from new tariffs"
X Link 2025-07-11T19:58Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@realJennaEllis @RepSwalwell The investigation was still ongoing under Trump 1s Christopher Wray who Biden kept on as head of FBI all [--] years. Trump [---] fired Christopher Wray appointed Kash Patel and all of a sudden its case closed nothing to see here. Everyone in Trump [--] has been promising the list"
X Link 2025-07-11T21:43Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Floridagirl0850 I will admit I was politically apathetic until 2018ish. Is this what happened in Trump [--] when he fired so many of his own appointees or did they actually suck Its obvious that whatever firing may or may not come from this is just scapegoating lol"
X Link 2025-07-11T22:12Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@redcountymisfit @Floridagirl0850 And now they have a handpicked FBI/DOJ again and they promised full retribution and deep state arrests. I have a sneaky feeling none will come. So what happens in [----] or [----] Republicans need to call out the BS & distance themselves from MAGA or its gonna be all Democrats"
X Link 2025-07-11T22:32Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@nicksortor @GuntherEagleman What happens when no ones arrested again after another [--] years of Trump and its obvious for anyone with two brain cells that it was all BS and Trump himself is the only one that could ever be arrested for crimes DJT and MAGA literally ruined the Republican Party"
X Link 2025-07-12T00:37Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@tiberious_spock @megynkelly PsyOP set up from the LEFT Lmao only the MAGA right & Trump has been talking about the Epstein files sooooo convinced that high profile democrats / deep state are on it & promising release of the list and arrests that will come from it"
X Link 2025-07-13T21:48Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@mypoliticalx @FriskyCritter Thats why you dont make false promises create mistrust in government and all of our institutions and divide the country like MAGA did. The whole campaign the last [--] years promising arrests & accountability was a psyop and has ruined the Republican Party"
X Link 2025-07-14T04:38Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@PolitPaige @mypoliticalx 100%. The whole campaign the last [--] years promising deep state arrests was a psyop & has ruined the Republican Party. The good republicans that stand on principle (e.g. @RepThomasMassie) get called a RINO. MAGA is/was a cult that demanded loyalty & discouraged free thinking"
X Link 2025-07-14T04:44Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@GuntherEagleman @NancyMace You will never see any high profile arrests & the [----] election wasnt stolen. Now can we all focus on the future & stop the taxpayer funded retribution tour MAGA is ruining any & all possibility of republicans winning the midterms unless they distance themselves from this BS"
X Link 2025-07-14T15:48Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@MrSausageGet There were over [--] investigations into election fraud & NOTHING was found. You know how badly DT didnt want to leave the White House They tried EVERYTHING & finally tried to force Mike Pence on Jan [--] to break his Constitutional oath to not hit the gavel & certify the results"
X Link 2025-07-14T17:13Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@SantaCawws @briantylercohen Maybe because MAGA spent the last [--] years fueling conspiracy theories creating deep mistrust in our government & promising high-profile arrests where there have been & will be NONE. Now MAGA is running around like chickens with their heads cut off & dont know what to believe"
X Link 2025-07-14T19:41Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Cernovich Exactly. You will never see any high profile arrests. Both sides are corrupt. Now can we all focus on the future & stop the taxpayer-funded retribution tour MAGA is ruining any & all possibility of republicans winning the midterms unless they distance themselves from this BS"
X Link 2025-07-14T19:56Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@jennvinestx @ShawnRyan762 @ShawnRyanShow @joerogan Kinda like Joe Rogan calls people out on their lies Oh wait RFK Jr. was able to spew completely debunked BS claims for [--] hours lol"
X Link 2025-07-14T21:03Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@DaveR41182 @RoKhanna @RepRalphNorman Im saying the investigation was ongoing it wasnt a campaign promise & wasnt hyped up as a huge conspiracy implicated high profile politicians except by MAGA and trumps new FBI director closed the investigation. Im all for releasing the files"
X Link 2025-07-15T03:47Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@realtimsharp The GENIUS Act is bipartisan & passed in the Senate 68-30 & was expected to pass with [--] issue in the House. The amendment was the quickest way to get the Epstein files released & in fact it wouldve made the GENIUS Act more likely to pass. Theres no other way to spin this"
X Link 2025-07-15T19:41Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Bobby_Johnson @RepMcGovern The GENIUS Act is bipartisan & passed in the Senate 68-30 & was expected to pass with [--] issue in the House. The amendment was the quickest way to get the Epstein files released & in fact it wouldve made the GENIUS Act more likely to pass since we all support transparency right"
X Link 2025-07-15T19:43Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@juliecooks1 @ezroll234 @TaraBull808 I agree but I genuinely think this was the fastest/easiest way. Bills/motions get stuck in committee have to be brought to the floor whereas the GENIUS Act was already scheduled to be brought to the floor & expected to pass easily. There was no reason to refuse the vote on it"
X Link 2025-07-15T19:56Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@juliecooks1 @ezroll234 @TaraBull808 Idk where youre reading that but it doesnt make sense that all democrats would vote yes to release sensitive information about victims (obviously not anyones intent) & all republicans would vote no. They either dont want to give the other side a win or are hiding something"
X Link 2025-07-15T20:21Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@UAHCHE @beinlibertarian The GENIUS Act is bipartisan & passed in the Senate 68-30 & was expected to pass with [--] issue in the House. The amendment was the quickest way to get the Epstein files released & in fact it wouldve made the GENIUS Act more likely to pass since we all support transparency right"
X Link 2025-07-15T20:43Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@pauldug59118129 @Congressman_JVD @RepThomasMassie [--]. Democrats didnt fuel the deep state Epstein theory like MAGA did. [--]. Biden kept on the same FBI director (Wray) that was appointed by Trump [--] when Epstein was arrested. Investigation continued for [--] years. Now Trump [--] fires Wray & its suddenly case closed STFU about it"
X Link 2025-07-16T16:12Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@ifergan19735319 @Congressman_JVD @RepThomasMassie [--]. Democrats didnt fuel the deep state Epstein theory like MAGA did. [--]. Biden kept on the same FBI director (Wray) that was appointed by Trump [--] when Epstein was arrested. Investigation continued for [--] years. Now Trump [--] fires Wray & its suddenly case closed STFU about it"
X Link 2025-07-16T16:13Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Conn4Patrick @CodeRed501 @JosephFordCotto What are you saying His DOJ and FBI closed to case said nothing to see here and no more arrests and said STFU about it. What are you talking about Nothing is coming"
X Link 2025-07-17T01:20Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@harlow_pam @mitchellvii Im just not down with the fingers crossed well make up the deficit with enough economic growth plan. And free trade tariffs which are a tax on us at the end of the day. We are not at war & there is no pandemic. The time for cuts is now & the BBB is a massive spending bill"
X Link 2025-07-17T02:44Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@KDeCourci @WarClandestine So youre suggesting that youre going to ignore the fact that his admin fully CLOSED the investigation & told you to STFU about it but instead youre gonna give him some time to come up with a way to blame it onwait for itthe democrats & youll just eat that shit up Lol"
X Link 2025-07-17T03:13Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Probably sitting on Pam Bondis black hole of a desk along with all [-------] other deep state/election fraud investigations that are coming. If Democrats doctored the Epstein files as Trump suggests that is a crime and should result in criminal investigations and prosecution. So where are they If Democrats doctored the Epstein files as Trump suggests that is a crime and should result in criminal investigations and prosecution. So where are they"
X Link 2025-07-17T18:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@ChristKing72013 @robbystarbuck True MAGA chooses [--] The FBI/DOJ memo CLOSED THE CASE. Trump is telling you to STFU about it. Pam Bondi all of a sudden is scared of cameras. Kash/Bongino are MIA. In what world do any of those facts lead you to believe ANYTHING will be coming of this in the next [---] years"
X Link 2025-07-17T18:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Considering the GENIUS Act just passed with massive bipartisan support Why was the 2-sentence amendment for release of the Epstein files BLOCKED from being added to the bill by every single GOP member of Congress that was present"
X Link 2025-07-17T19:54Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@CodyPalmer7 Once you see it its hard to unsee it. He lost me with the stolen [----] election & for causing Jan [--]. Now we have 50% of the country thinking we dont have free & fair elections. Im 99% sure there will be no deep state arrests either by [----] so what will people think then"
X Link 2025-07-17T20:49Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@ModernDayCrimes @DiligentDenizen Not everything is left vs right. Anybody that participated in child trafficking should be brought to justice. The RIGHT for YEARS pushed the theory about high profile politicians being involved & the existence of a client list/blackmail op. Now they just want it to go away"
X Link 2025-07-17T22:01Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@MissyAmericaUSA @ThePanicanKing Anybody that participated in child trafficking should be brought to justice. The RIGHT for YEARS pushed the theory about high profile politicians being involved & the existence of a client list/blackmail op. Now they just want it to go away & say it was set up by deep state"
X Link 2025-07-17T22:03Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@kate_p45 @DefiyantlyFree Not everything is left vs right. Anybody that participated in child trafficking should be brought to justice. The RIGHT for YEARS pushed the theory about high profile politicians being involved & the existence of a client list/blackmail op. Now they just want it to go away"
X Link 2025-07-17T22:49Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@MrAustinRogers @RepThomasMassie Please ask yourself why a bipartisan motion to release the Epstein files is a topic that challenges Trump"
X Link 2025-07-17T23:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@ModernDayCrimes @DiligentDenizen But the same guy led both Trump [--] and Bidens FBI. The point is Trump was convicted of a lot of weird shit. If after [--] more years of Trump we still have no other politician arrests & hes the only one thats been convicted of crimes will you finally realize that he is corrupt"
X Link 2025-07-17T23:55Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@bennyjohnson You had me until lower the rates. If you guys dont STFU and stop pressuring the nonpartisan fed chair to lower the rates when the rates DO GET LOWERED itll look like it was forced & the value of the US dollar will plummet"
X Link 2025-07-18T00:08Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@jules4u11 @CosmosCrytpid @RepThomasMassie @mtgreenee @laurenboebert So your belief is that anyone that questions Trump (originally a democrat) or puts their name on a motion that supports release of the Epstein files is a RINO"
X Link 2025-07-18T02:19Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Eradicator_NYC @RepRoKhanna Why is THAT your question and not the fact that the Speaker WONT EVEN BRING THE RULE TO A VOTE or why this is the FOURTH time the GOP has blocked the release of the files"
X Link 2025-07-18T03:23Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@GuntherEagleman @BasedMikeLee Expose it all not just whats pertinent So SIGN @RepThomasMassies bill & force them to bring it to the floor for a vote then release the files"
X Link 2025-07-18T03:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@BadGrendels @RossKneeDeep Clean bill like the one @RepThomasMassie & @RoKhanna wrote together that only [--] republicans support but [---] democrats support They cant even get Mike Johnson to bring it to the floor for a vote"
X Link 2025-07-18T06:56Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@lecoder198496 @ThePanicanKing Id rather have @RepThomasMassies bill calling for the release of everything. Why this and not that"
X Link 2025-07-18T07:05Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@BadGrendels @RossKneeDeep @RepThomasMassie @RoKhanna I think thats in response to the support his bill is getting which calls for full release with the obvious appropriate redactions. It would pass with the numbers. So now Trump is gonna maybe release part of a grand jury testimony if its pertinent. Why not everything"
X Link 2025-07-18T07:34Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@TerryLong81 @TheDemocrats @RepThomasMassie @RoKhanna So when Trump/Bondi releases whatever bits and pieces of a grand jury testimony that they deem relevant which if anything will be a nothing burger youll still support the full release via the bill right I mean why not give full transparency"
X Link 2025-07-18T15:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@TipuAnotherAcco @ImGinnyRobinson Sorry. Jumped the gun because you called her obsession girl so I thought youd be attacking Massie for his bill to release the files. Im just so sick of people acting like they care about the debt & attacking people like Massie lol"
X Link 2025-07-18T17:20Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@EvanAKilgore Didnt you hear the new talking points which is that anyone that wants to release the files is supporting the release of child porn 🙄🙄 Theyre grasping at literal straws"
X Link 2025-07-18T17:24Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Destroyed by the left Biden all [--] years kept on the same FBI director that Donald Trump appointed. The investigation was still going on & Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested during Biden. Trump [--] then fired that guy and gave us Kash Patel. Now suddenly its case closed nothing to see here STFU about it. Stop believing all the propaganda and deflections. Youre supporting protecting the pedophiles"
X Link 2025-07-18T19:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"BREAKING: A newly declassified document shows the results of a [----] intelligence probe which reveals there were SEVERAL successful & unsuccessful attempts made by Russia and other foreign countries to hack into our systems but were ultimately NOT determined to have altered the results of the election. Spicy Not"
X Link 2025-07-18T21:21Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"I see what youre saying. Interesting. To be clear I think the whole Russia thing was a giant waste of taxpayer money and I agree very divisive. But calling for treason is insane and I dont even know if there is any criminality here. Im glad you brought up the [----] election because yeah after his own DOJ looked into every possible theory thrown out there recounts etc. no evidence of election fraud was found. So after [--] years of Trump [--] when theres still no evidence found are people still gonna believe we have election fraud & just arent gonna believe in anything anymore I just dont get the"
X Link 2025-07-18T21:22Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@banrube @charliekirk11 Whos he He did what This intelligence report was done after the election to investigate potential cyberattack attempts. It was determined that there was no impact on the election. Then DJT was inaugurated. I dont see the smoking gun from this report"
X Link 2025-07-18T22:38Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@RepThomasMassie @d_Vick12 So since this was refused to be called for a vote is it all over and were just gonna get the pertinent grand jury testimony if even that 🙄🙄 thanks for trying. It doesnt go unnoticed"
X Link 2025-07-19T02:33Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@ThePanicanKing I understand where youre coming from. Its a gigantic slap in the face to dismiss it as a hoax when for many people this was the most glaring evidence of corruption & coverup for the elites in our lifetime. If nothing comes of this then nothing will ever come of anything"
X Link 2025-07-19T02:54Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@92percenter @ThePanicanKing So why was Massie & Ro Khannas bill that had 10+ other republicans that signed on to release the 2500+ ebooks worth of evidence (NOT grand jury testimony so therefore requiring a judges approval) get shot down Doesnt make sense"
X Link 2025-07-19T03:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Stardate325858 @Leslieoo7 @CaterinaCatK Wow. But then didnt the narrative kinda fall apart when he won Lol. Or when will it fall apart for people He obviously wants this Epstein thing to go away so badly & never talk about it again. At what point do people stop making excuses"
X Link 2025-07-19T04:01Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@smokescr_n @DC_Draino A wrecking ball There have been no arrests and wont be for the next [---] years. Closing the case on Epstein proved it. The sooner you all realize this the better or else this country will be more divided than ever in 2028"
X Link 2025-07-19T13:11Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"All of that is great but people are constantly screaming about arrests and are expecting the dismantling of the deep state. Meaning they want ppl like Obama Clintons pelosi Biden Schiff Fauci WHOEVER to be charged with crimes. When that doesnt happen and theres no accountability for these crimes ppl think are going on starting with this massive Epstein coverup people are going to lose faith and think their vote doesnt matter and not go to the polls in [----] or 2028"
X Link 2025-07-19T13:51Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"See I dont look at it as two sides. I would like to see for myself & form an opinion based on evidence. There are [----] ebooks worth of evidence and bipartisan support to release the evidence to the public (with redactions). If the evidence is supposedly doctored which btw no one that holds a government position is saying (just propaganda here on X) that ABSOLUTELY needs to be investigated and arrests need to be made for doctoring evidence. As far as this Obama Russiagate hoax. They declassified the file (which I posted a page of above) & that is what theyre running with. You wont see any more"
X Link 2025-07-19T14:29Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"So based on the facts we know right now none of the Epstein coverup makes sense. Trumps admin has gone from hyping up this list for YEARS to case closed nothing to see here and STFU about it to democrat hoax. You are being fed info from influencers that there is doctored friends. Thats even worse than believing what the government tells you because theyre pulling it out of their ass. Based on the facts we know right now about Russiagate the declassified document actually just reveals a successful intelligence operation. Evidence of cyberattacks but not determined to have affected the results"
X Link 2025-07-19T14:57Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@Jslow1210 @mkibbe So you agree releasing the Epstein files would paint Trump in a bad light I dont even think hes a pedo or would be implicated in any way. But ask yourself: why is pushing for the release of the Epstein files somehow putting Trump in a bad light"
X Link 2025-07-20T19:06Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Yes he has. Just because the rollout was a shit show doesnt mean it gets to just go away. Im confused by peoples lack of caring about transparency on the [----] ebooks worth of evidence that should be appropriately redacted and then declassified to the public as was promised by Pam Bondi Kash Patel Bongino etc. Ghislaine Maxwell is in prison for child trafficking. To who There are thousands of wire transfers from Epsteins accounts that the FBI has access to. To/from who Big banks e.g. JP Morgan have hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements. Why People are being protected and I want to"
X Link 2025-07-20T19:35Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Its not about the timeframe. The FBI and DOJ tried to sneakily close the case never to be talked about again. That should concern you. The problem is theyre now asking for the release of pertinent grand jury testimony which requires a judge to sign off on. They could literally release all other files right now without judge approval and thats what @RepThomasMassie and [--] other republicans and all democrats are asking for. There is a massive coverup going on. Trump is calling the Epstein thing a hoax and MAGA influencers are now trying to obviously distract everyone with Russiagate which cant"
X Link 2025-07-20T19:43Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"I just followed him. If theyre working on it then why did they formally close the case & say there will be no more arrests or information released & Epstein offed himself Im not holding my breath for them to release anything but well see I guess. But when they dont dont forget about the coverup & the fact that there was a bipartisan effort to release everything to the public that got shot down by Speaker Johnson aka Trumps lil bitch"
X Link 2025-07-20T19:56Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Does MAGA ever get sick of ousting every single Republican that goes against Trump I mean how many excuses can you make Mike Pence traitor. Thomas Massie grandstander. Mitt Romney radical left lunatic. DeSantis never Trumper. These are some of the best of the best & the most conservative Republicans. Prove me wrong"
X Link 2025-07-21T13:08Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@EmeraldRobinson Did you miss dear leader asking everyone to watch Mark Levin yesterday just to hear him talk about how we need to stop talking about the Epstein files Guess you missed that"
X Link 2025-07-21T16:16Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"The investigation was still ongoing all [--] years of Biden under TRUMPs FBI director Christopher Wray (e.g. Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested under Biden - still an ongoing investigation). If Biden was going to doctor the files wouldnt he have fired Wray & appointed his own FBI director Also why are you making excuses Trump admin hasnt even alleged doctoring of files because its not true at all. Do you realize youre making excuses and looking dumb AF for a man youve never even met Cult behavior"
X Link 2025-07-21T22:38Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@RedAlertFlorida @FellaBoston @AdamKinzinger So youre saying they doctored evidence and then didnt release it when they had the power to do so Lol"
X Link 2025-07-21T23:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Massie and Ro Khanna cosponsored a bill that has enough bipartisan support to pass & would release all of the files with appropriate redactions. After this started gaining traction Trump told Bondi to release whatever he deems is pertinent Grand Jury testimony which is the only part of the investigation that requires a judges approval before release. Trump is single handedly & actively blocking the release of the files and thats why hes so pissed off at Massie for the 80th time this year. Hes just hoping everyone is too stupid to notice"
X Link 2025-07-22T07:37Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Not that you care but he only voted to suspend the debt ceiling under Biden because it included a 1% across the board cut & we were about to default. He voted NO on the BBB because the spending cuts are a joke & it was a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase - largest in history. Thomas Massie is a national treasure"
X Link 2025-07-22T07:56Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@SelectiveEmpath @RepThomasMassie Lol"
X Link 2025-07-22T08:07Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@segregation25 @jsstevens71 @RepThomasMassie Why is a bipartisan bill that would release the Epstein files (with appropriate redactions) an attack on Trump"
X Link 2025-07-22T15:11Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@TRRebellion @Strandjunker Who TF is Kathy Griffin Pretty sure the WORLD STAGE is not watching her actions as they are the POTUS. Its embarrassing no matter who is in the White House. Wrong is wrong period"
X Link 2025-07-22T20:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"What ever happened to this Mike Johnson to publicly release [-----] hours of sensitive January [--] footage https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/nov/17/mike-johnson-january-6-video-footageCMP=share_btn_url https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/nov/17/mike-johnson-january-6-video-footageCMP=share_btn_url"
X Link 2025-07-23T03:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Heres a reality check for you. Youre shit posting on the best Republican in congresss tweet that calls out Mike Johnson for calling an EARLY RECESS in order to deliberately subvert a vote on the Epstein bill. Instead of asking WHY Mike Johnson is ignoring the ask of the people youre attacking Massie & supporting the coverup. Hes 100% right and youre 100% wrong"
X Link 2025-07-23T04:20Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Thats what you view it as Baiting dems into demanding the release Trumps coverup makes him look guilty AF when no one thought he was even implicated in the files until maybe now because of how hes handling this. What is that 39484-D chess Massie is more America First than DJT ever was. I dont give a fuck who is demanding the release. The right thing to do is to ask for transparency. Based on your rhetoric you were probably one of the people that believed there would be deep state arrests based on the Epstein files so congrats youve been played again and are scrambling for excuses to protect"
X Link 2025-07-23T04:31Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@Floridagirl0850 Same. I mean this is a huge claim should be investigated if true and prob should be a higher priority investigation for the DOJ than whatever theyre trying to do with Obama"
X Link 2025-07-24T16:10Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@JCDeardeuff @GrattonUmphrk @kate_p45 Do you pay attention Mike Johnson cant stand Massie and complains about him all the time"
X Link 2025-07-28T01:00Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Destroying his credibility & therefore the GOPs credibility. If the GOP and MAGA influencers dont start distancing themselves from this BS screaming about arrests 24/7 that are never gonna happen the GOP will lose the midterms because disillusioned voters wont go to the polls = dems win. Its literally self sabotage and Im so fucking frustrated by it"
X Link 2025-07-30T21:05Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@LauraLoomer @HawleyMO Trump is big mad at Josh Hawley because he was the ONLY Republican to vote with all of the Democrats in the committee (8-7) to advance the bill to ban congressional stock trading"
X Link 2025-07-30T21:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@EricLDaugh Why not post the truth Trump is BIG MAD at Josh Hawley because he was the ONLY Republican to vote with all of the Democrats in the committee (8-7) to advance the bill to ban congressional stock trading"
X Link 2025-07-30T21:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@guitarm3dic387 @LarryECornell @EricLDaugh Josh Hawley today was the ONLY Republican to vote with all of the Democrats in the committee (8-7) to advance the bill to ban congressional stock trading. Look it up. Thats why Trump is mad"
X Link 2025-07-30T21:31Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"They literally eat up whatever he says. I dont even know wtf hes referring to about voting against going into Nancy Pelosis records. Probably some BS from years ago that was embedded into an omnibus or just BS altogether. This is a single-issue bill to ban politicians from stock trading. Every Democrat voted to advance the bill and every Republican except Josh Hawley voted no. And he gets attacked. People dont even bother to look into the facts"
X Link 2025-07-30T21:34Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@krassenstein Hes also going scorched earth on Josh Hawley for being the ONLY Republican in committee to vote yes to advance the single-issue bill to ban politicians from stock trading. https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7 https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7"
X Link 2025-07-30T21:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@JasonOnBlast @EricLDaugh @HawleyMO Today Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted to advance the single issue bill banning congressional stock trading out of committee. Thats why Trump is mad. https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7 https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7"
X Link 2025-07-30T21:41Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@JasonOnBlast @EricLDaugh @HawleyMO Look it up. No one knows wtf Trump is talking about with the Nancy Pelosi vote. The point is hes lashing out at Hawley TODAY is because TODAY he was the only GOP yes vote on the single-issue bill against banning stock trading and all other Republicans voted AGAINST the bill"
X Link 2025-07-30T21:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@joeroganhq Then why TF is he going scorched earth on Josh Hawley for being the ONLY Republican to vote Yes to advance the single-issue bill banning congressional stock trading"
X Link 2025-07-30T21:46Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@kate_p45 @HawleyMO Today Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted to advance the single issue bill banning congressional stock trading out of committee. Thats why Trump is mad"
X Link 2025-07-30T21:48Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@JasonOnBlast @EricLDaugh @HawleyMO Show me the amendment. No one knows what Trump is talking about with the Nancy Pelosi thing but Id love to be informed if you know. This is what happened today though and is much more likely the reason why Trump is pissed. https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7 https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7"
X Link 2025-07-30T21:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@pajacobs @HawleyMO That doesnt answer the question at all. No one knows what hes even talking about with Nancy Pelosi and Josh Hawley voting against it. This is what happened TODAY and clearly whats drawing the ire of Trump. Facts matter. https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7 https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7"
X Link 2025-07-31T00:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Oh wait you didnt even post the Josh Hawley rant that he tweeted. Why are you sending me tweets about a trade deal Happy about the trade deal. Not happy about attacking Josh Hawley for being the only Republican to vote for a bill that bans politicians from trading stocks while in office"
X Link 2025-07-31T00:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@CronkiteNot @nw89ta @bennyjohnson Yes. Today Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted to advance the single issue bill banning politicians from stock trading out of committee. Thats why Trump is mad"
X Link 2025-07-31T00:35Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@thetaffee @bennyjohnson Today Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted to advance the single issue bill banning politicians from stock trading out of committee. Thats why Trump blasted him. Youre either against it or not and Josh Hawley voted the right way"
X Link 2025-07-31T00:37Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@CronkiteNot @nw89ta @bennyjohnson I mean see for yourself. Read for yourself. https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7 https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7"
X Link 2025-07-31T00:38Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@CronkiteNot @nw89ta @bennyjohnson Where are you getting that information Its literally Josh Hawleys bill. Why would he allow that"
X Link 2025-07-31T00:42Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@thetaffee @bennyjohnson Heres a good article that explains it too. https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7 https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7"
X Link 2025-07-31T00:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@MoronicHeadline @bennyjohnson Today Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted yes to advance the single issue bill banning politicians from stock trading out of committee. All Democrats on the committee voted yes. What say you MAGA"
X Link 2025-07-31T00:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@dia45528 @kate_p45 @HawleyMO And where are you getting that information This is what happened. https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7 https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7"
X Link 2025-07-31T00:49Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Josh Hawley literally wrote the bill. Committees are bipartisan on purpose because ideally for a bill to advance out of committee theres evidence of bipartisan support and therefore the bill is more likely to succeed if it can pass through a bipartisan committee. The public wants this. If Trump is trying to sabotage the bill just because he thinks it might target him even though it doesnt affect this presidency he is being selfish & sketch AF"
X Link 2025-07-31T00:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"She doesnt. Pelosi loves trading stocks. It was a single-issue bill written by Josh Hawley that bans elected officials from trading stocks while in office. The vote was 8-7 with Josh Hawley being the only Republican to vote yes. Among the no votes was Rick Scott the richest person in Congress. So"
X Link 2025-07-31T01:58Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Rick Scott is the richest person in Congress. He wasnt going to vote yes on the bill no matter what. His amendment shouldve been a separate bill or investigation rather. Its a single-issue bill and is fine the way it is. Youre either against elected officials trading stocks or youre not. The 8-7 vote made it clear that [--] Republicans are not against it and Josh Hawley and [--] Democrats are"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:04Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@rvorce @Rhett_Solger @bennyjohnson The bill is to stop any elected official from trading stocks while in office. Youre either against it or youre not. The 8-7 vote proved that [--] Republicans (including Rick Scott - richest person in Congress) are not and Josh Hawley and [--] Democrats are"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:06Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@CronkiteNot @grok @bennyjohnson So why not still vote for it We dont want elected officials trading stocks while in office. If they want to do an investigation separately sure but it doesnt belong in this simple single-issue (finally) bill"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:08Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Today Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted YES to advance the single-issue bill that HE WROTE which bans elected officials from stock trading while in office out of committee & onto the floor for a vote. Youre either against it or not and Josh Hawley voted the right way"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:10Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Literally how. He wrote the bill to ban elected officials from trading stocks while in office. Period. Single issue bipartisan. Rick Scott (richest member of Congress btw) introduced an amendment targeting one specific person in Congress for a separate investigation ( not what the bill was about) that would prevent any Democrat from voting yes on the bill. Because of the filibuster it needs [--] votes to pass in the Senate"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:13Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"A bill that bans stock trading by elected officials obviously. First of all thats permanent as it would become a law. Second of all investigations go nowhere in case you havent noticed and if Nancy Pelosi was found guilty of insider trading that would have absolutely [--] effect on any other elected officials ability to trade stocks while in office"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Apply the same logic to the amendment @RoKhanna tried to add to the GENIUS Bill (ended up passing with massive bipartisan support) to release the Epstein files. This was the amendment very simple and for whatever reason every single Republican in attendance (200+) voted against the amendment. Amendments complicate bills & people on both sides dont like them for one reason or another. Rick Scotts amendment directly against Pelosi if voted yes on wouldve killed the bill because no Democrat wouldve voted for it. He knew this. Him and Trump are just trying to call him out to make him look bad"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:25Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Josh Hawleys current plan is to get the bill he wrote to ban ALL elected officials from trading stocks passed through Congress. Its a bipartisan issue and needs to remain that way in order to pass the 60-voted filibuster. If you dont support his current plan you dont support banning stock trading"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Today Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted YES to advance the single-issue bill (finally) banning politicians from stock trading out of committee. This is a bipartisan issue. Youre either against it or not and Josh Hawley voted the right way. Rick Scott (richest person in Congress) introduced an random amendment unrelated to the bill and singling out Pelosis past alleged insider trading that he knew would kill the bill. It needs [--] votes to become law so He purposely did this and obviously doesnt want the bill to pass. Hawley is just the scapegoat of the day for trying to sign into"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Josh Hawley wrote a single-issue bill banning elected officials from trading stocks while in office. He was the only Republican on the committee that voted yes to get it out of committee. The excuse theyre using for voting no is that Hawley voted no on a random ass amendment (introduced by the RICHEST MEMBER OF CONGRESS - Rick Scott) singling out Pelosi for an unrelated insider trading investigation wouldve made [--] Democrats vote for the bill. He knew the amendment if voted yes on would kill the bill. It never wouldve passed the 60-vote Senate filibuster. He doesnt want the bill to pass"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Josh Hawley wrote a single-issue bill banning elected officials from trading stocks while in office. He was the only Republican on the committee that voted yes to get it out of committee (8-7 vote). The excuse theyre using for voting no is that Hawley voted no on a random ass amendment (introduced by the RICHEST MEMBER OF CONGRESS - Rick Scott) singling out Pelosi for an unrelated insider trading investigation wouldve made [--] Democrats vote for the bill. He knew the amendment if voted yes on would kill the bill. It never wouldve passed the 60-vote Senate filibuster. He doesnt want the bill to"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

".which was introduced as an amendment to Josh Hawleys single-issue bill that wouldve passed with bipartisan support. Rick Scotts amendment wouldve made [--] democrats vote for it and wouldve killed the bill. Rick Scott and Trump knew that and therefore obviously dont support banning elected officials from trading stocks. If they want to investigate Pelosi do it separately. Josh Hawley would most certainly have voted yes on that. But he wants his legislation to become law. Obviously"
X Link 2025-07-31T02:57Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Josh Hawley wrote a single-issue bill banning elected officials from trading stocks while in office. He was the only Republican on the committee that voted yes to get it out of committee (8-7 vote). The excuse theyre using for voting no is that Hawley voted no on a random ass amendment (introduced by the RICHEST MEMBER OF CONGRESS - Rick Scott) singling out Pelosi for an unrelated insider trading investigation wouldve made [--] Democrats vote for the bill. Hawley knew the amendment if voted yes on would kill his bill. It never wouldve passed the 60-vote Senate filibuster. He doesnt want the bill"
X Link 2025-07-31T03:22Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Hi. Do you understand that for a bill to be signed into law it must pass through the 60-vote filibuster in the Senate Today Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted YES to advance HIS OWN single-issue bill (finally) banning elected officials from stock trading while in office. This is a bipartisan issue. Youre either against it or not and Josh Hawley and [--] Democrats voted the right way. The excuse Republicans (& Trump) are using on why they voted no is that Hawley voted no to Rick Scotts (richest person in Congress) amendment that is unrelated to the bill and singles out Pelosis past"
X Link 2025-07-31T03:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Today Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted YES to advance HIS OWN single-issue bill (finally) out of committee that bans elected officials from stock trading while in office. This is supposedly and should be a bipartisan issue. Youre either against it or not and Josh Hawley and [--] Democrats voted the right way. All [--] Republicans besides Hawley voted no. The excuse the NO votes are using is that Hawley voted no on an amendment introduced by Rick Scott (richest person in Congress) that was unrelated to the bill which singled out Pelosi & called for an investigation into her past"
X Link 2025-07-31T04:04Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Today Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted YES to advance HIS OWN single-issue bill (finally) out of committee that bans elected officials from stock trading while in office. This is supposedly and should be a bipartisan issue. Youre either against it or not and Josh Hawley and all [--] Democrats voted the right way. All [--] Republicans besides Hawley voted no. The excuse the NO votes are using is that Hawley voted no on an amendment introduced by Rick Scott (richest person in Congress) that was unrelated to the bill which singled out Pelosi & called for an investigation into her past"
X Link 2025-07-31T04:06Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Hawleys bill is bipartisan and is simple single issue. The bill needs to pass with [--] votes in the Senate because of the filibuster. The amendment to Josh Hawleys bill was introduced by Rick Scott (richest member of Congress btw) and wouldve killed the bill because no Democrat wouldve voted for it. Rick Scott knows that Trump knows that and Hawley knows that. The difference is Hawley actually wants the bill to pass so he obviously voted no to the amendment. Introduce the amendment & investigation into Pelosi separately and no shit Hawley would vote for it. Its scapegoating and an excuse to"
X Link 2025-07-31T04:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"First of all in order for bill to become law it has to pass the 60-vote filibuster in the Senate. They need at least [--] Democrats to get on board if they want to pass any bill over the next [---] years. Second of all Josh Hawley wrote the bill himself NOT a RINO yet every single one of his GOP colleagues in the committee voted against banning elected officials from stock trading while in office"
X Link 2025-07-31T05:21Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@CBeard007 @SenRickScott @POTUS @SpeakerPelosi @HawleyMO @SenHawleyPress The amendment would have killed Josh Hawleys own bill because no democrats wouldve voted for it and it needs [--] votes to overcome the Senate filibuster in order for the bill to pass into law"
X Link 2025-07-31T05:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Did you read my original tweet Before Hawleys bill was voted on there was an amendment proposed by Rick Scott. It was an amendment that singled out Nancy Pelosi and called for an investigation into her alleged past insider trading. The amendment had nothing to do with the bill to ban elected officials to trade stocks while in office. Hawley voted no to this amendment because his bill was simple a single-item bill and wouldve had bipartisan support (supposedly although Im questioning whether Republicans support a ban on stock trading or not at this point). For a bill to pass the 60-vote"
X Link 2025-07-31T06:15Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@a_zstorm @nicksortor @HawleyMO Exactly. Theyre just trying to make Hawley look bad for voting yes on his OWN BILL that the PEOPLE widely support & cover for the fact that they dont actually support banning elected officials from trading stocks while in office"
X Link 2025-07-31T06:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Rick Scotts amendment to Hawleys bill had NOTHING to do with the actual bill of banning election officials from trading stocks while in office. The amendment doesnt even belong in a bill (investigations = straight referral to the DOJ not through Congress) & would have killed Hawleys bill because no Democrats wouldve voted for it and therefore it wouldnt have passed the 60-vote filibuster in the Senate. Rick Scott & Trump knew this and tried to kill the bill on purpose because they dont support banning elected officials from trading stocks. Trump actually owned You"
X Link 2025-07-31T06:43Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Before Hawleys own bill was voted on there was an amendment proposed by Rick Scott. It was an amendment that singled out Nancy Pelosi and called for an investigation into her alleged past insider trading. The amendment had nothing to do with the bill to ban elected officials to trade stocks while in office. Investigations go to the DOJ not Congress. Hawley voted no to this amendment because his bill was simple a single-item bill and wouldve had bipartisan support (supposedly although Im questioning whether Republicans support a ban on stock trading or not at this point and you should too)."
X Link 2025-07-31T06:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Before Hawleys bill was voted on there was an amendment proposed by Rick Scott. It was an amendment that singled out Nancy Pelosi and called for an investigation into her alleged past insider trading. The amendment had nothing to do with the bill to ban elected officials to trade stocks while in office. Hawley voted no to this amendment because his bill was simple a single-item bill and wouldve had bipartisan support (supposedly although Im questioning whether Republicans support a ban on stock trading or not at this point). For a bill to pass the 60-vote filibuster in the Senate they need at"
X Link 2025-07-31T06:48Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Before Hawleys bill was voted on there was an amendment proposed by Rick Scott. It was an amendment that singled out Nancy Pelosi and called for an investigation into her alleged past insider trading. The amendment had nothing to do with the bill to ban elected officials from trade stocks while in office. Hawley voted no to this amendment because his bill was simple a single-item bill and wouldve had bipartisan support (supposedly). For a bill to pass the 60-vote filibuster in the Senate they need at least [--] Democrats to sign on to the bill. Had this amendment been attached to the bill it"
X Link 2025-07-31T06:56Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@HefSteph @MadPatriot79 @SenRickScott @POTUS @SpeakerPelosi @HawleyMO Exactly. You can verify everything I said. Thats literally how it happened yet the talking points have been issued MAGA influencers are shitting on Josh Hawley and people are eating it up and calling him a RINO. Its unbelievable"
X Link 2025-07-31T07:06Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Wtf are you saying The un-amended bill written by Hawley himself passed through committee only. All [--] of Hawleys GOP colleagues in this committee voted NO on the bill and the bill passed only because of Hawley and the [--] Democrats that voted for it NONE of whom were Pelosi or Sanders"
X Link 2025-07-31T07:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Hawleys bill was bipartisan and simple yet every single one of his GOP colleagues in the committee voted against it. They all voted against banning elected officials from stock trading period. Rick Scotts amendment wouldve killed Hawleys single-item bill because no Democrats wouldve voted for it. Newsflash: [--] votes are needed to pass a bill into law. He killed the bill on purpose and Trump is cheering him on & scapegoating Hawley. Wake up"
X Link 2025-07-31T07:39Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@SKJones376 @RealAmVoice @POTUS @TrashDiscourse He did. It was Hawleys bill and was bipartisan. The richest man in Congress (Rick Scott) tried to introduce an amendment that he knew would kill the bill if added because no Democrats wouldve voted for it and the bill needs [--] votes to pass the filibuster"
X Link 2025-07-31T07:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Before Hawleys bill was voted on there was an amendment proposed by Rick Scott. It was an amendment that singled out Nancy Pelosi and called for an investigation into her alleged past insider trading. The amendment had nothing to do with the bill to ban elected officials to trade stocks while in office. Hawley & all the democrats voted no to this amendment because his bill was simple a single-item bill and wouldve had bipartisan support once it was brought to the floor for a vote. For a bill to pass the 60-vote filibuster in the Senate they need at least [--] Democrats to sign on to the bill."
X Link 2025-07-31T07:43Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Julie_H84 @RealAmVoice @POTUS He did. It was his bill yet all [--] of his GOP colleagues in the committee voted against it. It only passed because Hawley and the [--] Democrats on the committee voted to advance it out of committee"
X Link 2025-07-31T07:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Rick Scott richest person in Congress tried to introduce an unrelated amendment to Hawleys bill calling for an investigation into Pelosi. This wouldve killed the bill if added to Hawleys single-item bill because no Democrats wouldve voted for the bill and they need [--] votes in the Senate to pass a bill into law. Hawleys bill banning elected officials from trading stocks passed out of committee but wont be voted on because obviously the Trump & the GOP dont actually want to ban stock trading and therefore it wont be brought to a vote. Hawley tried to do the right thing"
X Link 2025-07-31T07:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"HAWLEYs bill that HE wrote was [--] page single item bipartisan banning elected officials from trading stocks while in office. It narrowly passed through committee 8-7 with all GOP members except for Hawley voting no and all Democrats voting yes. Prior to voting on the bill Rick Scott GOP (richest person in Congress) tried to kill the bill by adding an unrelated amendment to investigate Nancy Pelosi which no Democrats would have voted for if attached to Hawleys bill. The bill wouldnt have gotten the [--] votes needed to pass through the Senate and wouldve failed. Now Trump is screaming about"
X Link 2025-07-31T09:07Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@KSingleton1230 @Sassafrass_84 Exactly. Im all for it but an investigation has nothing to do with Congress and should go straight to the DOJ. It was literally political posturing & theater to give the GOP an excuse to vote no and make Hawley look bad"
X Link 2025-07-31T10:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted YES to advance HIS OWN single-issue one-page bill (finally) out of committee. The bill simply bans elected officials from stock trading while in office. The excuse the NO votes (& Trump) are using is that Hawley voted no on an amendment to his bill that was proposed PRIOR to the final vote by Rick Scott (richest person in Congress). The amendment was unrelated to the bill singled out Pelosi & called for an investigation into her past alleged insider trading. Hawley (and Scott) knew this would kill the bill because no Democrats would vote for it"
X Link 2025-07-31T10:54Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@RichardMccrar20 @dd_chip @NoLieWithBTC Thune wont bring it to a vote because the GOP & Trump no longer support banning elected officials from trading sock as evident by Trump smearing Hawley & every single Republican in the committee besides Hawley voting against Hawleys own one-page single-issue bill"
X Link 2025-07-31T11:15Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Today Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted YES to advance HIS OWN single-issue one-page bill out of committee that bans elected officials from stock trading while in office. This is supposedly and should be a bipartisan issue. Youre either against it or not and Josh Hawley and [--] Democrats voted the right way. All [--] Republicans besides Hawley voted no. The excuse the NO votes are using is that Hawley voted no on an amendment introduced by Rick Scott (richest person in Congress) that was unrelated to the bill which singled out Pelosi & called for an investigation into her past alleged"
X Link 2025-07-31T11:22Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted YES to advance HIS OWN single-issue one-page bill out of committee that bans elected officials from stock trading while in office. This is supposedly and should be a bipartisan issue. Youre either against it or not and Josh Hawley and all [--] Democrats voted the right way. All [--] Republicans besides Hawley voted no. The excuse the NO votes are using is that Hawley and the democrats voted no on an amendment introduced by Rick Scott (richest person in Congress) that was unrelated to the bill which singled out Pelosi & called for an investigation into"
X Link 2025-07-31T11:27Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted YES to advance HIS OWN single-issue one-page bill out of committee that bans elected officials from stock trading while in office. This is supposedly and should be a bipartisan issue. Youre either against it or not and Josh Hawley and all [--] Democrats voted the right way. All [--] Republicans voted AGAINST their own GOP colleagues CLEAN bill. The pathetic excuse the NO votes are using is that Hawley and the Democrats voted no on an amendment introduced by Rick Scott (richest person in Congress) that was unrelated to the bill which singled out Pelosi"
X Link 2025-07-31T11:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Josh Hawley was the only Republican that voted YES to advance HIS OWN single-issue one-page bill out of committee that bans elected officials from stock trading while in office. This is supposedly and should be a bipartisan issue. Youre either against it or not and Josh Hawley and all [--] Democrats voted the right way. All [--] Republicans voted AGAINST their own GOP colleagues CLEAN bill. The pathetic excuse the NO votes are using is that Hawley and the Democrats voted no on an amendment that was introduced by Rick Scott (richest person in Congress) that was unrelated to the bill which singled"
X Link 2025-07-31T11:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Do you understand that no bill will pass the Senate without [--] votes because of the filibuster Hawleys bill that he wrote himself was bipartisan & single issue yet every one of his GOP colleagues voted against it & tried to kill it before it could even make it out of committee"
X Link 2025-07-31T11:46Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@LisaProsen @matt_vanswol @unusual_whales This sums it up. https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7 https://www.businessinsider.com/congressional-stock-trading-ban-clears-senate-committee-republicans-arguing-insults-2025-7"
X Link 2025-07-31T11:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Its literally Hawleys bill. He wrote it so hes not gonna vote against it. Its one page single issue and bipartisan. Rick Scott (R-FL) the literal richest member of Congress tried to kill the bill in committee by proposing a BS unrelated amendment to investigate Pelosi knowing that [--] Democrats would vote for it if that was attached & therefore no chance of getting the [--] votes to pass the Senate. Thats where all the smears are coming from. End of the day Hawleys original bill without the amendment passed through committee narrowly with every single GOP Congress member aside from Hawley himself"
X Link 2025-07-31T12:01Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"But some of the ones that are principled & have proven to be on the RIGHT side of the issues get attacked by Trump & threatened with primaries. Its not normal for the POTUS to target members of their OWN party every other day. Lets not forget Trump was a Democrat for most of his life. His words are not the end all be all for which members of Congress are America First"
X Link 2025-07-31T13:14Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@timburchett Looks good but why not include the executive branch instead of just Congress Josh Hawleys bill bans ALL elected officials from stock trading. His bill was also voted on & advanced out of committee yesterday so should be ready to be brought to the Senate floor. Do we need two"
X Link 2025-08-01T04:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@JuiceTheGator @Sportandgrace This is what Im worried about. Trump/MAGA is constantly ousting & trying to primary some of the best conservatives in Congress & some of the new Republicans in Congress are just blindly loyal MAGA. They are not conservative & are useless"
X Link 2025-08-01T06:58Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"I think a lot of it for my friends at least that switched to first-time Trump voters in [----] (wild I know) is actually because of TikTok. Its algorithm creates an echo chamber and of course they werent going and fact checking everything they heard someone say on TikTok. Even if its a legitimate news clip that can be taken out of context and framed into whatever point these media influencers want to make. If you hear the same talking points over and over again it doesnt take long to form a strong opinion or belief in something and then thats just how you think whether its based on fact or not."
X Link 2025-08-01T08:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@JustTheTweets17 The data comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics not anything to do with Jerome Powell. The numbers they initially reported for the months of May and June were completely wrong and look REALLY BAD"
X Link 2025-08-01T15:07Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Wtf is going on at the Bureau of Labor Statistics How do you mess up data this badly"
X Link 2025-08-01T15:10Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"HAWLEY introduced a single-issue bipartisan bill to ban elected officials from stock trading. EVERY single one of his Republican colleagues voted NO on his bill & it only passed out of committee because [--] Democrats backed his bill. Do not believe the smear campaign going on right now against him. Its complete BS and I can explain why if youd like"
X Link 2025-08-01T15:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"The size of the revisions are wild but if the people behind these numbers were politically motivated why TF would they inflate the numbers in May and June I just cant with the stupidity & these MAGA influencers running wild with this Biden-appointed BS. Now we will get Trump loyalists installed & wont be able to trust a damn thing"
X Link 2025-08-01T19:55Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Never. Democrats just vote for whoever their party puts on the ballot and move on with their life. The efforts MAGA makes to justify & spin anything & everything for Trump is so fucking embarrassing & is literally ruining the credibility of the Republican Party for Lord knows how long. Just STOP"
X Link 2025-08-02T01:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Nobody with a brain has an issue with this ad on either side. But its true the only people I have ever seen talking about this issue are MAGAs & Fox News and its been OVER A WEEK. MAGAs with a following are posting some cringe videos of extreme liberals on TikTok with zero following & thats why this blew up. The extreme fringe right doesnt represent Republicans as a whole just like the extreme left doesnt represent Democrats as a whole so why is MAGA trying to make this into something its not Its embarrassing lol"
X Link 2025-08-06T05:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@SupraFren @trackingdonald @IfindRetards Of course this comment is coming from a man. You prob have no issue with this stellar comment either"
X Link 2025-08-06T06:06Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"The maps are redrawn every 10yrs when the new census data comes out. Both sides then gerrymander for the next year to try & get the best deals. But Greg Abbott signed the congressional maps into law in [----] based on the [----] census data. So the Texas GOP & the freaking PRESIDENT (completely unprecedented for the president to weigh in on this) is now calling for mid-decade redistricting based on absolutely zero new census data simply because they want to flip seats before the midterms. If you cant see the blatant power grab in that youre part of the problem"
X Link 2025-08-06T06:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@justhefax_mam @grok Are you kidding Lol look I can do that too. @grok how many times has RFK Jr. current head of HHS have to be corrected for misstatements"
X Link 2025-08-06T07:15Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"First of all I am not a Democrat. Second of all why are they even trying & why is Trump pushing for them to do this You see no issue with that It's causing a stupid gerrymandering war where now everyone is trying to do the WRONG thing. And btw different states have different laws so some states (e.g. California New York) may actually be able to do this without going through the courts. That's why you see stuff like this now happening"
X Link 2025-08-06T12:49Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"2 full weeks later & still the only people talking about this are MAGAs Fox News Trump & now the official White House account. Have you seen the Sydney Sweeney ad🗣 https://t.co/oRCKPh9Fwp Have you seen the Sydney Sweeney ad🗣 https://t.co/oRCKPh9Fwp"
X Link 2025-08-06T12:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"It happens on BOTH SIDES. E.g. Wisconsin North Carolina Texas Florida South Carolina have inadequate representation of Democrat voters. If this gerrymandering war leads to California & New York fighting back and doing the same thing Republicans will lose seats there. Its DUMB"
X Link 2025-08-06T13:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Like I said Im agreeing with you but its a problem on both sides. Since you dont believe me: Red states with ZERO Dem house seats: Oklahoma Arkansas Iowa Utah Nebraska Idaho Montana West Virginia Alaska North Dakota South Dakota Wyoming Red states with just ONE Dem house seat: Mississippi South Carolina Tennessee Kentucky Kansas But you know what It doesnt matter because while both sides gerrymander the % of seats out of [---] usually ends up working out to match the % of popular vote. E.g. 50.6% of the House seats are Republican vs. 47.8% of the House seats are Democrat as of [----]. Close enough"
X Link 2025-08-06T13:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"They are true. And Nick Begich whoever what is rep of Alaska is a Republican. Illinois is horrible. GOP doesnt get adequate representation based on voter turnout in states like California New York etc. Im agreeing with you. Im just saying that Democrats say the same about states like Florida (28% D seats vs 42% D voters) Texas (34% D seats vs 41% D voters) North Carolina (21% D seats vs 47% D voters) Arizona (33% D seats vs 47.7% D voters) Wisconsin (25% D seats vs 49% D voters). Both sides are unfairly represented in a bunch of different states. But again mid-decade redistricting - simply"
X Link 2025-08-06T14:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@LucaTaner @EricLDaugh The last time the Democrats called for mid-decade redistricting was in [----] (Oregon). The last time Republicans did it was in [----] and [----] (North Carolina twice). This is extremely rare frowned upon & should NOT be supported by anyone who respects the Constitution. STOP"
X Link 2025-08-06T14:54Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"My ultra-MAGA family lives in Texas though and they have the same exact fears as you about losing Texas to the Democrats. Texas will be fine and do not need to do a repeat of [----]. The Democrats fled then too. In [----] the neutral courts drew the maps because the GOP shared power with the Dems & they were at a standstill. Once they regained power in [----] the GOP redrew the maps not based on new data but just because they could and flipped [--] seats to red. This time your own GOP governor signed off on the map in [----] And Texas gained two seats (yay). But now suddenly theres a HUGE problem with"
X Link 2025-08-06T15:39Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Agreed. Illinois is horrible and so is California. However Democrats can & do say the same about states like Florida Texas North Carolina South Carolina Arizona Wisconsin etc. Now that weve established gerrymandering happens on both sides this ISNT ABOUT gerrymandering or legitimately trying to fix the representation problem. This is about MID-DECADE REDISTRICTING being done simply because Texas feels like it and per the POTUS he won big in Texas so hes entitled to more seats. Thats not how it fucking works. Mid-decade redistricting is an egregious abuse of power & is very much frowned upon"
X Link 2025-08-06T18:05Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@ImBreckWorsham Definitely. But a psyop has an intended goal. So what was the intended goal Because it certainly LARGELY benefited the MAGA movement & helped get Donald Trump elected. So a psyop for what purpose"
X Link 2025-08-06T18:30Z [---] followers, [----] engagements

"@cmill3080 @ImBreckWorsham And PS I am done supporting Israel as well and dont understand other than lobbying why TF we are still funding their relentless attacks. I just dont know if Israel is behind QAnon like is that what people really think"
X Link 2025-08-06T18:58Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing