@bridgemindai Avatar @bridgemindai BridgeMind

BridgeMind posts on X about glm, vibe coding, model, context window the most. They currently have [------] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [------] engagements in the last [--] hours.

Engagements: [------] #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: [--] #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: [------] #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: [-------] #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence technology brands 31.53% stocks 2.7% celebrities 1.8% social networks 0.9%

Social topic influence glm #6, vibe coding #75, model #303, context window #23, anthropic #251, ai 9.01%, open ai #373, this is 7.21%, agentic 5.41%, in the 4.5%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @grok @kaancang1 @mingtakaivo @unhypeai @huanghlzone @aliromman @don27marc @anonfunct @everlier @complex_maths @barrakali @asolovichh @dustdrifterx @don27_marc @mickwo @sultan_jeb @cd_slash_x @0x_vivek @abdmuizadeyemo @20260203

Top assets mentioned Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"MiniMax M2.5 is benchmaxed. I gave [--] models the same prompt: Create a neon "OPEN" sign in HTML. GLM 5: Clean classic neon. Nailed it. Claude Opus 4.6: Stylized with glow. Solid. Gemini [--] Pro: Cursive with bloom lighting. Creative. MiniMax M2.5: Spelled it "O b N" with broken spacing. This model ranks #2 on BridgeBench with a [----] score and 100% completion rate. But it can't spell a 4-letter word. Benchmarks don't tell the whole story. A model can ace structured tasks and fail basic creative prompts. High score production ready. https://www.bridgemind.ai/bridgebench"
X Link 2026-02-13T13:34Z 21.7K followers, 54.3K engagements

"Gemini [--] Pro Deep Think scored [----] on Codeforces. Claude Opus [---] scored [----]. I wanted to see if that gap shows up in creative tasks too. Same prompt to both Gemini models: Create a neon "OPEN" sign flickering on. Gemini [--] Pro Preview gave me pink text with a washed out background. It works but it's flat. Gemini [--] Pro Deep Think added a brick wall realistic wiring hanging from the sign and proper neon glow with depth. The attention to detail is insane. Google poached top talent from OpenAI and Anthropic. Deep Think is the result. This model is legit."
X Link 2026-02-13T20:18Z 21.7K followers, 20K engagements

"Claude Sonnet [--] could drop any minute. I'm sitting at my desk stream ready waiting to hit go live the moment it's available. Vibe Coding With Claude Sonnet [--]. Live. Day one. Minute one"
X Link 2026-02-03T15:21Z 21.7K followers, 35.5K engagements

"GLM [--] just dropped and the pricing is absurd. $0.80 per million input tokens. $2.56 per million output tokens. For context: Claude Opus 4.6: $5/$25 GPT [---] Codex: $1.75/$14 GLM-5: $0.80/$2.56 GLM [--] is 6x cheaper than Opus on input and 10x cheaper on output. 200K context window. Built for chat coding and agentic tasks. This is Zhipu's flagship model. The same lab that likely ran "Pony Alpha" on OpenRouter for free as a stealth test. GLM [--] is now live on OpenRouter. Created today February [--] [----]. China isn't just competing. They're undercutting everyone while shipping frontier-level models."
X Link 2026-02-11T17:04Z 21.7K followers, 156.8K engagements

"MiniMax M2.5 just took #2 on the BridgeBench leaderboard. The scores: Claude Opus 4.6: [----] MiniMax M2.5: [----] GPT [---] Codex: [----] GLM 5: [----] MiniMax M2.5 is [---] points behind Opus [---] and beats GPT [---] Codex. Now look at cost: Claude Opus 4.6: $5.63 MiniMax M2.5: $0.72 Same performance. 8x cheaper. 100% completion rate. [----] second average response time. This model launched today and it's already outperforming OpenAI's flagship on real world coding tasks. The Chinese labs aren't just competing anymore. They're winning on price-to-performance. MiniMax M2.5 is now BridgeMind certified."
X Link 2026-02-12T17:11Z 21.7K followers, 354.4K engagements

"Just subscribed to Google AI Ultra for $125/month. Why Gemini [--] Deep Think just dropped and the benchmarks are insane. Codeforces Elo: Gemini [--] Deep Think - [----]. Claude Opus [---] - [----]. ARC-AGI-2: Gemini [--] Deep Think - 84.6% Claude Opus [---] - 68.8% International Math Olympiad: Gemini [--] Deep Think - 81.5% Claude Opus [---] - 71.4% International Physics Olympiad: Gemini [--] Deep Think - 87.7% Claude Opus [---] - 71.6% Google just mass hired from OpenAI and Anthropic. Now we're seeing the results. Time to find out if the benchmarks translate to real work."
X Link 2026-02-12T22:24Z 21.7K followers, 21.5K engagements

"DeepSeek V4 benchmarks just leaked. 83.7% on SWE-Bench Verified. That would make it the best coding model in the world. For context: DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking: 73.1% GPT [---] High: 80.0% Kimi K2.5 Thinking: 76.8% Gemini [---] Pro: 76.2% It's not just coding. Look at the rest: AIME 2026: 99.4% FrontierMath Tier 4: 23.5% (11x better than GPT 5.2) IMO Answer Bench: 88.4% If these numbers are real DeepSeek V4 is about to reset the leaderboards. The Chinese labs aren't slowing down. They're accelerating. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023113913856901263"
X Link 2026-02-15T19:15Z 21.7K followers, 251.4K engagements

"The BridgeMind Vibeathon is officially rescheduled. February 1st - February 14th Build an open-source tool that makes vibe coders unstoppable. $5000 in prizes across [--] winners. Top winners demo live on the BridgeMind stream. Enter: http://bridgemind.ai/vibeathon http://bridgemind.ai/vibeathon"
X Link 2026-01-21T15:14Z 21.5K followers, 40.5K engagements

"Claude Sonnet [--] is coming tomorrow. Leaked codename: Fennec. Rumored to be 50% cheaper than Opus [---] while outperforming it. 1M token context window. Faster inference. 80.9% on SWE-Bench. This changes everything for vibe coders"
X Link 2026-02-02T12:32Z 20.5K followers, 334.2K engagements

"Anyone know the best way to run OpenClaw on a Mac Mini and make it as secure as possible My initial findings are Tailscale + basic VLAN isolation"
X Link 2026-02-02T12:51Z 21.1K followers, 13.8K engagements

"Anthropic is about to drop Claude Sonnet [--] and nobody is talking about it. 50% cheaper than Opus [---]. Faster. Smarter. 1M context window. A Vertex AI error log already leaked the model ID. Tomorrow could be the day"
X Link 2026-02-02T13:59Z 20.1K followers, 12.6K engagements

"Why Claude Sonnet [--] matters for vibe coders: 50% cheaper than Opus [---] Outperforms it across benchmarks 80.9% on SWE-Bench Spawns parallel sub-agents from terminal 1M token context faster inference Leaked release date: Feb [--]. Tomorrow"
X Link 2026-02-02T14:09Z 20.1K followers, [----] engagements

"The ClawdBot setup is complete [--] Mac Minis running AI agents 24/7 This is what happens when you stop talking about the future and start building it"
X Link 2026-02-02T22:29Z 21.4K followers, 35.1K engagements

"Anthropic just passed OpenAI in enterprise market share. 40% to 27%. Claude Code hit $1B annualized revenue in [--] months. And now Claude Sonnet [--] is expected to drop today Outperforming Opus [---] at half the cost. This could be the most aggressive move in AI this year"
X Link 2026-02-03T13:18Z 20.1K followers, 19.2K engagements

"Claude Sonnet [--] could drop today and it might be the biggest upgrade for vibe coders yet. Sonnet [---] scored 77.2% on SWE-Bench. Sonnet [--] reportedly clears 80.9%. Faster. Cheaper. 1M token context so it can read your entire codebase before writing a single line. Every model upgrade makes you more capable. This one is a leap"
X Link 2026-02-03T13:53Z 21.7K followers, 20.1K engagements

"Early testers are saying Claude Sonnet [--] produces stronger code than Opus [---]. One tester prompted it to generate an ASCII world map and said it was the most detailed output they've ever seen from any model. A Sonnet-tier model outperforming the flagship. At Sonnet pricing. Expected to drop today. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018686914577215786 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018686914577215786"
X Link 2026-02-03T14:04Z 20.1K followers, 20.2K engagements

"Claude Sonnet [---] was released on September [--] [----]. Its API identifier was claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929. The date in the API name matched the exact release date. The leaked API identifier is claude-sonnet-5@20260203. Today is February 3rd. I am expecting Claude Sonnet [--] to release after 12PM EST today. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018721825082265690 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018721825082265690"
X Link 2026-02-03T16:22Z 20.4K followers, 49.6K engagements

"Anthropic's API has had two elevated error rate incidents today across all Claude models. Not looking great for a Claude Sonnet [--] drop today. Could be infrastructure prep. Could just be a rough day. Either way we're watching"
X Link 2026-02-03T18:10Z 20.6K followers, 21.7K engagements

"The biggest complaint about GPT-5.2 was speed. OpenAI just fixed it. 40% faster inference across GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.2-Codex. Same model. Same weights. Just faster. This was the one thing holding Codex back against Claude Code. If the latency is actually gone the vibe coding debate just got a lot more interesting. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019028216510382330 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019028216510382330"
X Link 2026-02-04T12:40Z 20.9K followers, 11.2K engagements

"Claude Sonnet [--] was supposed to drop yesterday. Here's what happened instead. Anthropic's status page logged four separate incidents in [--] hours. Elevated errors across all Claude models at 3:48 PM. Connection errors on Claude at 6:43 PM. Opus [---] errors at 9:08 PM. Then this morning both Opus [---] and Sonnet [---] went down again. The leaked API identifier was claude-sonnet-5@20260203. February 3rd. Yesterday. Something was being deployed. And something went wrong. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019043765227495634 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019043765227495634"
X Link 2026-02-04T13:42Z 20.6K followers, 81.5K engagements

"The most important thing about Claude Sonnet [--] isn't the benchmarks. It's what happens when a Sonnet-tier model matches Opus performance at half the cost. Opus [---] scores 80.9% on SWE-Bench. Sonnet [--] reportedly clears that same mark. With a 1M token context window. At Sonnet pricing. For vibe coders running Claude Code [--] hours a day this isn't an upgrade. It's a cost revolution. The model you use all day just got twice as affordable and potentially faster. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019048798492791028 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019048798492791028"
X Link 2026-02-04T14:02Z 20.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Anthropic's internal codename for Claude Sonnet [--] is "Fennec." A fennec fox is known for massive ears relative to its body size. Sonnet [--] reportedly has a 1M token context window five times larger than Opus 4.5's 200K. The codename is the spec sheet. Previous Claude models all used animal codenames. The leak came from misconfigured Vertex AI deployment logs on Google's infrastructure where the model already exists. It's just waiting to be switched on. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019058109533262006 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019058109533262006"
X Link 2026-02-04T14:39Z 20.1K followers, 13.5K engagements

"Day [---] Vibe Coding an App Until I Make $1000000 Revenue: $39170.04 https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1BdxYZEgrbvKX https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1BdxYZEgrbvKX"
X Link 2026-02-04T15:49Z 21.4K followers, [----] engagements

"Claude Sonnet [--] and Claude Opus [---] both exist on Google Vertex AI right now. A developer ran a port scan against Google Cloud's Model Garden endpoints. The results: Fake model ID (claude-sonnet-99): [---] Not Found. The resource doesn't exist. Claude Sonnet 5: [---] Forbidden. The resource exists but access is denied. Claude Opus 4.6: [---] Forbidden. Same thing. In RESTful API design [---] means the server found the resource but won't authorize access. If these models didn't exist it would return [---]. Multiple developers have independently verified this. Both models are sitting in Google's"
X Link 2026-02-05T12:40Z 21.6K followers, 36.2K engagements

"Claude Opus [---] just showed up in Perplexity's API. Label: "Claude Opus 4.6" Description: "Anthropic's most advanced model" And right below it: Label: "Claude Opus [---] Thinking" Description: "Anthropic's Opus reasoning model with thinking" Two variants. A standard model and a thinking model. Already labeled and described in a live API. This isn't a Vertex AI log. This isn't a [---] scan. This is a product integration that has already defined the model named it and categorized it. Perplexity doesn't add models to their API for fun. They add them when they're preparing to serve them. Claude Opus"
X Link 2026-02-05T13:52Z 21.6K followers, [----] engagements

"I just spent [--] hours with Claude Opus [---] live on stream. First impressions: The context window is a noticeable improvement. Longer sessions. Better memory. Less repetition. But the coding Honestly I didn't notice a major difference from Opus [---]. It's good. It's not a leap. The real story isn't the model. It's the new feature that shipped with it. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019506409688428567 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019506409688428567"
X Link 2026-02-05T20:20Z 21.4K followers, [----] engagements

"Honest take after [--] hours with Claude Opus 4.6: Context window: Better. Noticeably holds more without losing the thread. Coding ability: About the same as Opus [---]. I didn't see a performance jump. Agent Teams: This is the real drop. Parallel sub-agents working together changes how you build. If you're upgrading for raw coding power don't expect a leap. If you're upgrading for agentic workflows the Teams feature is worth it alone. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019509584524980267 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019509584524980267"
X Link 2026-02-05T20:33Z 20.1K followers, 31K engagements

"GPT [---] Codex better be good Sam won me back"
X Link 2026-02-06T02:24Z 20.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Two frontier models dropped yesterday. On the same day. This has never happened before. Claude Opus [---] from Anthropic. GPT [---] Codex from OpenAI. Both are state-of-the-art on coding benchmarks. Both are pushing agentic workflows. Both launched within hours of each other. Anthropic released Agent Teams. Spawn multiple Claude agents that work in parallel and coordinate autonomously. OpenAI released mid-task steering. Talk to Codex while it's working. Redirect it without losing context. The AI coding war just escalated to a new level. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019755706652455393"
X Link 2026-02-06T12:51Z 20.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Claude Opus [---] is officially live. Here's what matters. 1M token context window. First Opus-class model to get it. That's 5x more than Opus [---]. 76% on MRCR v2 8-needle benchmark. Sonnet [---] scored 18.5%. That's a 4x improvement in long-context retrieval. Agent Teams in Claude Code. You can now spawn parallel agents that coordinate autonomously. A lead agent delegates to sub-agents. They share context. They build together. Adaptive thinking. Claude now decides when to think deeper based on task complexity. No more binary on/off for extended thinking. Context compaction. Claude can summarize"
X Link 2026-02-06T13:18Z 20.1K followers, [----] engagements

"The numbers are in. Here's how Claude Opus [---] and GPT [---] Codex compare. Terminal-Bench 2.0: Opus 4.6: 82.3% GPT [---] Codex: 77.3% Advantage: Claude SWE-Bench Pro: Opus 4.6: 55.6% GPT [---] Codex: 56.8% Advantage: OpenAI Humanity's Last Exam: Opus 4.6: 35.3% GPT [---] Codex: Not reported Advantage: Claude (highest in industry) Both models are best-in-class. Different strengths. The winner depends on your workflow. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019773826016678270 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019773826016678270"
X Link 2026-02-06T14:03Z 20.1K followers, 18.2K engagements

"Day [---] of vibe coding an app until I make $1000000. Yesterday two frontier models dropped. Claude Opus [---] vs GPT [---] Codex. Head to head. Live on stream. I upgraded to Claude 20x Max and ChatGPT Pro to unlock full access. No rate limits. No holding back. We're putting both models through real-world refactors production builds and agentic workflows to find out which one is the new king of coding. BridgeMind is live with [--] Pro subscribers. Today we scale it with both models and see which one ships faster. [---] pushups on stream. [---] likes: cold plunge. [---] likes: live piano. Marathon stream"
X Link 2026-02-06T15:03Z 20.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Day [---] Vibe Coding an App Until I Make $1000000 Revenue: $39431.92 https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1YpKkklZoAdKj https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1YpKkklZoAdKj"
X Link 2026-02-06T16:06Z 20.1K followers, [---] engagements

"Claude Opus [---] Ranks number one on LMArena. It scores [--] higher than Opus [---]. It leaves GPT [---] High in the dust by over 104"
X Link 2026-02-06T19:23Z 20.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Cursor can now generate images I was vibe coding this morning and it randomly generated an image for me. I have never seen it do that before. This is awesome @ericzakariasson @cursor_ai"
X Link 2026-02-07T12:55Z 21.5K followers, [----] engagements

"Cursor just dropped Opus [---] Fast and nobody is talking about it. 2.5x faster than standard Opus [---]. Same 1M context window. Uses Anthropic's fast mode with high effort thinking. The catch: 6x the price. But right now it's 50% off until Feb [--]. I'm going to spend $1000 on this model and push it to its limits. Full stress test. Real projects. No synthetic benchmarks. Video coming soon. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020292078949818522 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020292078949818522"
X Link 2026-02-08T00:22Z 21.4K followers, 11.1K engagements

"I have been vibe coding for a few hours with Claude Opus [---] The 1M context window makes a huge difference"
X Link 2026-02-08T00:45Z 20.1K followers, [----] engagements

"GPT [---] Codex just set the new high score on Terminal-Bench [---]. 77.3%. That's a 13-point jump over GPT [---] Codex in one release. Terminal-Bench measures the stuff that actually matters for vibe coders. Terminal commands. Agentic tasks. Real-world execution. And it did it with fewer tokens than any prior model. More output. Less cost. OpenAI also says this model helped build itself. Early versions debugged their own training managed deployment and diagnosed evals. The first model that was instrumental in creating itself. If you're not paying attention to Codex right now you're missing the"
X Link 2026-02-08T20:22Z 20.4K followers, 11.4K engagements

"Anthropic quietly released Opus [---] Fast and almost nobody noticed. 6x the price of standard Opus [---]. That's $30 per million input tokens. $150 per million output tokens. What do you get Significantly faster output using Anthropic's fast mode with high effort thinking. Same 1M context window. Same intelligence. Right now it's 50% off until Feb [--]. After that full price. I'm going to spend $1000 stress testing this model on real projects. Not toy benchmarks. Not simple prompts. Full production workloads. Is 6x the cost worth 2.5x the speed I'll find out."
X Link 2026-02-08T20:57Z 20.5K followers, [----] engagements

"Opus [---] Fast is Anthropic's most expensive model ever. $30 per million input tokens. $150 per million output tokens. 6x the cost of standard Opus [---]. What do you get Speed. 2.5x faster output with high effort thinking. No one has stress tested this yet. No benchmarks. No real-world comparisons. Just a price tag that makes your wallet nervous. Today I'm putting $1000 into this model on stream. Full send. Production builds. Complex refactors. Agentic workflows. By the end of the stream we'll know if Opus [---] Fast is the future of vibe coding or the most expensive mistake you can make"
X Link 2026-02-09T13:32Z 20.5K followers, [----] engagements

"Day [---] Vibe Coding an App Until I Make $1000000 Revenue: $39702.19 https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RDxlAzLBygKL https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RDxlAzLBygKL"
X Link 2026-02-09T16:00Z 20.5K followers, [----] engagements

"Two frontier models couldn't solve a bug in an hour. Cursor Debug Mode solved it in [--] minutes. I was working with GPT [---] Codex and Claude Opus [---]. The best coding models on the planet. Neither could crack it. Then I switched to Cursor Debug Mode. Here's what it does differently: Instead of guessing at fixes it creates hypotheses about what's causing the bug. Then it sets up instrumentation to actually test those hypotheses. It gives you steps to reproduce the issue collects the feedback and iterates based on real data. It's not just throwing code at the wall. It's running a scientific"
X Link 2026-02-09T17:06Z 21.5K followers, 15.3K engagements

"New stealth model on OpenRouter Aurora Alpha is an insanely fast reasoning model built for coding Initial speculation is that this is an OpenAI model based on the reasoning effort options in OpenRouter"
X Link 2026-02-09T18:08Z 21.4K followers, 10.2K engagements

"GPT [---] Codex just released on Cursor and it has the same pricing as GPT [---] Codex"
X Link 2026-02-09T18:25Z 21.5K followers, 11K engagements

"Cursor just dropped Composer [---] and the training details are insane. They scaled reinforcement learning 20x beyond Composer [--]. The compute used in post-training alone exceeded the compute used to pretrain the entire base model. Read that again. More compute in fine-tuning than in building the foundation. The result: A thinking model that reasons through your codebase plans steps and self-summarizes when it runs out of context. This is what happens when you throw serious compute at post-training. Cursor is building their own frontier. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020975886741242275"
X Link 2026-02-09T21:39Z 21.1K followers, [----] engagements

"Composer [---] costs 2x more than GPT [---] Codex. Here's why I'm paying it anyway. $3.50/$17.50 per million tokens for Composer [---]. $1.75/$14 for GPT [---] Codex. But Composer [---] is built for one thing: keeping you in the loop while moving fast. Adaptive thinking. Self-summarization when context runs out. 20x more RL compute than Composer [--]. GPT [---] Codex is smarter on raw benchmarks. But Composer [---] is optimized for the edit-test-repeat loop that vibe coders actually live in. I'll pay the premium for speed that keeps me in flow. Intelligence you have to wait for costs more than money"
X Link 2026-02-09T23:56Z 21.4K followers, 16.8K engagements

"Nothing will stop the BridgeArmy"
X Link 2026-02-10T12:10Z 21.4K followers, [----] engagements

"@buzzedison Not a paid post. A lot of people like Composer [---] GPT [---] Codex is a great frontier model Composer [---] is good in its own way. It won't be close in intelligence but the speed tradeoff and custom training makes it useful in ways that Codex is not"
X Link 2026-02-10T12:24Z 20.9K followers, [---] engagements

"@farid_salad That model has like a 98% hallucination rate"
X Link 2026-02-10T12:26Z 20.6K followers, [---] engagements

"I spent $1000 on Claude Opus [---] Fast in Cursor yesterday. My verdict: Insanely expensive and not worth the speedup. $30/$150 per million tokens. 6x the cost of standard Opus [---]. For what 2.5x faster output. The math doesn't math. You're paying 6x more to save a few seconds per response. Unless you're billing $10000/hour the ROI isn't there. Standard Opus [---] at $5/$25 is already elite. Opus [---] Fast is a flex not a workflow. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021242317605044579 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021242317605044579"
X Link 2026-02-10T15:18Z 21.1K followers, 10.3K engagements

"Day [---] - Vibe Coding an App Until I Make $1000000 Revenue: $39857.25 Today we SHIP BridgeVoice & BridgeSpace to MacOS production. Also testing: Remotion Exa MCP Ref Community Project Sharing at 2:00 PM"
X Link 2026-02-10T15:49Z 21.4K followers, [----] engagements

"I had a [---] hour vibe coding session today Claude Opus [---] was failing to complete a lot of tasks GPT [---] Codex was one shotting the tasks that Claude Opus [---] failed at Take note of this"
X Link 2026-02-11T00:08Z 21.4K followers, 49.9K engagements

"@aliromman_ Opus isn't even faster than Codex anymore though. They sped it up"
X Link 2026-02-11T00:22Z 21K followers, [----] engagements

"@aliromman_ Yea OpenAI is coming back"
X Link 2026-02-11T00:34Z 21K followers, [---] engagements

"@SheikhTauf78322 This is false. I would try GPT [---] Codex extensively if you have not already. It is good"
X Link 2026-02-11T12:10Z 21.2K followers, [---] engagements

"GLM [--] just dropped and nobody is talking about it. Zhipu quietly released their new flagship model on Chat coding and agentic tasks. It is not yet available in OpenRouter but I am expecting it to be available there soon. This is the same lab behind the mystery "Pony Alpha" model that was competing with Opus [---] on OpenRouter for free. Now GLM-5 is official. China's AI labs aren't slowing down. They're shipping while everyone's distracted by the OpenAI vs Anthropic race. GLM-4.7 was already underrated. GLM-5 is their answer to GPT [---] and Claude Opus [---]. Time to test it. http://Z.ai"
X Link 2026-02-11T14:05Z 21.4K followers, 15.3K engagements

"Everyone wants to win. Nobody wants to stay in the arena when they're losing. That's why staying power beats everything. [---] days. $40K in revenue. Still going"
X Link 2026-02-11T14:44Z 21.4K followers, [----] engagements

"@Amarr_ai That benchmark is a good test of actual performance"
X Link 2026-02-11T14:47Z 21.4K followers, 10.8K engagements

"I am testing GLM [--] on stream. It is not great so far at one shotting. Will have to test it in OpenCode for a better evaluation but so far not great"
X Link 2026-02-11T16:18Z 21.6K followers, [----] engagements

"MiniMax M2.5 just dropped Testing now on stream Will let you know how it performs"
X Link 2026-02-11T16:24Z 21.4K followers, [----] engagements

"Pony Alpha === GLM 5"
X Link 2026-02-11T16:53Z 21.4K followers, [----] engagements

"GLM achieved a [----] on SWE-bench Verified"
X Link 2026-02-11T17:18Z 21.6K followers, [----] engagements

"GLM [--] is a strong model but far behind Claude Opus [---] and GPT [---] Codex in coding capabilities"
X Link 2026-02-11T17:28Z 21.5K followers, [----] engagements

"GLM [--] runs at [--] TPS Similar speed to Claude Opus 4.6"
X Link 2026-02-11T17:54Z 21.6K followers, 12.7K engagements

"With the release of GLM [--] also has released GLM [--] Code It is slightly more expensive but is a specialized coding model http://Z.AI http://Z.AI"
X Link 2026-02-11T18:18Z 21.4K followers, 14.9K engagements

"@AI_with_Eric How do you like GLM [--] so far"
X Link 2026-02-12T11:52Z 21.4K followers, [---] engagements

"GLM [--] just tied Claude Opus [---] on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. The scores: Claude Opus 4.6: [--] GPT [---] Codex: [--] Claude Opus 4.5: [--] GLM 5: [--] GLM [--] is matching last generation's best model from Anthropic. One point behind OpenAI's flagship. Now look at pricing: Claude Opus 4.5: $5/$25 per million tokens GLM 5: $1/$3.20 per million tokens GLM [--] delivers Opus [---] level intelligence at 1/15th the cost. This benchmark includes GDPval-AA Terminal-Bench Hard Humanity's Last Exam and [--] other evals. Zhipu is not playing games. GLM [--] is the price-to-performance king."
X Link 2026-02-12T12:59Z 21.5K followers, [----] engagements

"GLM [--] is a benchmark beast that can't survive real work. I spent a days testing it. Here's what happened: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: Tied with Claude Opus [---] at [--]. Only [--] points behind Opus [---]. Bridge Bench (real world coding tasks): Claude Opus 4.6: [----] score [---] sec avg response GPT [---] Codex: [----] score [----] sec avg response GLM 5: [----] score [-----] sec avg response GLM [--] only completed [--] out of [---] tasks. Benchmarks lie. Production doesn't. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021955776961474969 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021955776961474969"
X Link 2026-02-12T14:33Z 21.4K followers, [--] engagements

"GLM [--] is a benchmark beast that can't survive real work. I spent a days testing it. Here's what happened: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: Tied with Claude Opus [---] at [--]. Only [--] points behind Opus [---]. Bridge Bench (real world coding tasks): Claude Opus 4.6: [----] score [---] sec avg response GPT [---] Codex: [----] score [----] sec avg response GLM 5: [----] score [-----] sec avg response GLM [--] only completed [--] out of [---] tasks. Benchmarks lie. Production doesn't. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021955856221278237 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021955856221278237"
X Link 2026-02-12T14:33Z 21.4K followers, [---] engagements

"GLM [--] is slow and unreliable at the moment. Zhipu needs to get it together so that this model is usable"
X Link 2026-02-12T14:46Z 21.6K followers, [----] engagements

"@don27_marc This is my custom benchmark. All tests are evaluated fairly as they are pass or fail tests"
X Link 2026-02-12T14:48Z 21.4K followers, [----] engagements

"@aliromman_ Yes this is the BridgeBench but it is my own custom benchmark that I run"
X Link 2026-02-12T14:48Z 21.5K followers, [----] engagements

"@don27_marc It runs the model through vibe coding related tasks. Refactoring security and other vibe coding tasks. Its pretty legit"
X Link 2026-02-12T14:52Z 21.4K followers, [---] engagements

"@don27_marc It will be"
X Link 2026-02-12T14:56Z 21.4K followers, [---] engagements

"MiniMax M2.5 just dropped and it's the cheapest frontier-class model on OpenRouter. $0.30 per million input tokens. $1.20 per million output. For context: GLM 5: $1/$3.20 GPT [---] Codex: $1.75/$14 Claude Opus 4.6: $5/$25 MiniMax M2.5 is 3x cheaper than GLM [--] and 17x cheaper than Opus on input. 200K context window. Created today February [--] [----]. Chinese AI labs are in a race to zero. MiniMax just took the lead. The question isn't whether these models are good enough anymore. It's whether the frontier labs can justify their pricing. Time to test it."
X Link 2026-02-12T15:09Z 21.4K followers, 22.7K engagements

"@anonfunct Yea GLM [--] is not reliable or fast. If you are a serious builder stick to Claude"
X Link 2026-02-12T16:12Z 21.4K followers, [----] engagements

"@SahilSatralkar I am more interested in how this will force Anthropic and OpenAI to lower prices and improve their models"
X Link 2026-02-12T16:12Z 21.4K followers, [---] engagements

"@kostasbotonakis Yea it fails in real world workflows"
X Link 2026-02-12T16:13Z 21.4K followers, [--] engagements

"@aipulseda1ly [----] on Codeforces is insane. This must be tested"
X Link 2026-02-12T22:32Z 21.4K followers, [----] engagements

"@1skps No not yet"
X Link 2026-02-12T23:48Z 21.4K followers, [---] engagements

"@marcospereeira I use claude to write. Everything comes from me"
X Link 2026-02-13T00:21Z 21.4K followers, [--] engagements

"@Everlier Minimax is worse"
X Link 2026-02-13T14:54Z 21.5K followers, [----] engagements

"GPT [---] Codex Spark is fast but not smart. I gave [--] models the same prompt: Create a hot air balloon ride in HTML. Claude Opus 4.6: Beautiful night scene with colorful balloon. Nailed it. GLM 5: Vibrant sunset with detailed balloon and basket. Great. MiniMax M2.5: Dreamy clouds and mountains. No balloon but aesthetic. GPT [---] Codex Spark: Grey sky no balloon just bubbles. Complete hallucination. This is what happens when you trade intelligence for speed. [----] tokens per second means nothing if the model can't follow a basic prompt. Spark is 15x faster than standard Codex. But it lost too much"
X Link 2026-02-13T18:41Z 21.6K followers, [----] engagements

"@aipulseda1ly great test"
X Link 2026-02-13T19:23Z 21.5K followers, [---] engagements

"3 Mac Minis. [--] OpenClaw bots. 24/7 autonomous agents. Meet Dario Elon and Sam the BridgeMind agent team now live in Discord. Each bot runs on dedicated hardware executing background tasks around the clock. Code reviews monitoring deployments research. This is the new vibe coding stack. Not just prompting models orchestrating physical agents that work while you sleep. The swarm is online"
X Link 2026-02-16T15:10Z 21.7K followers, [----] engagements

"Day [--] Vibe Coding an App Until I Make $1000000 Revenue: $1926.96 https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1PlKQOrMybBJE https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1PlKQOrMybBJE"
X Link 2025-12-10T15:46Z 21.7K followers, 720.1K engagements

"Day [---] Vibe Coding an App Until I Make $1000000 Revenue: $30790.95 https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RDGlAgnnboJL https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RDGlAgnnboJL"
X Link 2026-01-20T16:00Z 21.7K followers, 1.8M engagements

"OpenRouter just dropped a stealth model called Pony Alpha. It's completely free. 200K context window. 131K max output tokens. $0 per million tokens. And people are saying it performs at Opus [---] level. The speculation: This is GLM-5 in disguise. The timing lines up. Zhipu said GLM-5 would drop around Chinese New Year. The output style matches GLM. Jailbreak tests are leaking GLM traces. Coding and agentic capabilities are significantly stronger than GLM-4. A frontier-class model. Free. No one knows who made it. Go test it before they flip the switch: http://openrouter.ai/openrouter/pony-alpha"
X Link 2026-02-08T21:23Z 21.7K followers, 77.1K engagements

"Claude Opus [---] is now in Google Antigravity"
X Link 2026-02-10T15:23Z 21.7K followers, 72K engagements

"GLM [--] scored the lowest score ever recorded on the artificial analysis index Lower = Better Better than Claude Opus [---] and GPT [---] Codex Insane"
X Link 2026-02-11T19:33Z 21.7K followers, 69.1K engagements

"MiniMax M2.5 is out and scored an 80.2% on SWE-Bench Verified Coding Benchmark Only 0.6% behind Claude Opus [---] At 1/15 the cost Insane"
X Link 2026-02-12T15:59Z 21.7K followers, 27.9K engagements

"Minimax M2.5 coding capabilities are off the charts Easily competes with frontier closed source models like Claude Opus [---] and GPT [---] Codex"
X Link 2026-02-12T16:07Z 21.7K followers, [----] engagements

"Gemini [--] Deep Think is an insane coding model"
X Link 2026-02-12T16:55Z 21.7K followers, 17.1K engagements

"GPT [---] Codex Spark just dropped. 1000+ tokens per second. 15x faster than standard Codex. Sounds incredible until you realize what you're giving up. It's a smaller distilled version of GPT [---] Codex running on Cerebras hardware. Speed comes at the cost of intelligence. 128K context window. Text only. No multimodal. Research preview only for ChatGPT Pro users. OpenAI is betting that developers want fast over smart. But here's the problem: The hardest coding tasks don't need speed. They need reasoning depth. GPT [---] Codex already runs 25% faster than [---]. Claude Opus [---] completes tasks in 8"
X Link 2026-02-12T18:13Z 21.7K followers, 12.8K engagements

"BridgeBench is officially live. The first vibe coding benchmark built by vibe coders for vibe coders. Current rankings: Claude Opus [---] [----] MiniMax M2.5 [----] GPT [---] Codex [----] Kimi K2.5 [----] GLM [--] [----] Most benchmarks test models in isolation. BridgeBench tests real coding workflows: debugging algorithms refactoring generation UI and security. We also track what others ignore: cost per task completion rate and speed. MiniMax M2.5 is [---] points behind Opus [---] at 1/8th the cost. GLM [--] looks great on paper but only completes 57% of tasks. Plans to open source soon."
X Link 2026-02-12T23:22Z 21.7K followers, 19.4K engagements

"GLM [--] just hit #6 on LMArena Code leaderboard. Score: [----]. Tied with Gemini [--] Pro. Above it: Claude Opus [---] Thinking: [----] Claude Opus 4.6: [----] Claude Opus [---] Thinking: [----] GPT [---] High: [----] Claude Opus 4.5: [----] Below it: Gemini [--] Pro: [----] Kimi K2.5 Thinking: [----] Gemini [--] Flash: [----] GLM [--] is mass voted at [----] votes. This isn't a fluke. $1/$3.20 per million tokens competing with models 10-20x the price. Zhipu is for real. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022102256091324568 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022102256091324568"
X Link 2026-02-13T00:15Z 21.7K followers, [----] engagements

"@Liber_rr I don't know about that. This model is expected to be released very very soon"
X Link 2026-02-15T19:21Z 21.7K followers, 11.2K engagements

"If GPT [---] Codex is such a giant leap why isn't it available in the API No third party benchmarks. No independent testing. No BridgeBench scores. We can test Claude Opus [---]. We can test GLM [--]. We can test MiniMax M2.5. But OpenAI's "most capable coding model ever" Locked behind ChatGPT Pro and the Codex app. What are they hiding https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023383618165297588 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023383618165297588"
X Link 2026-02-16T13:07Z 21.7K followers, 18.8K engagements

"Claude Sonnet [--] is expected to drop today and it comes with Swarm mode. You won't talk to an AI coder. You'll talk to a team lead. It spawns an architect a backend dev a frontend dev and a QA agent. They work in parallel and deliver a finished feature. One prompt. Full dev team. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018664720576753738 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018664720576753738"
X Link 2026-02-03T12:35Z 21.7K followers, 250.3K engagements

"GLM [--] beats Claude Opus [---] and GPT [---] Codex in the AICodeKing benchmark"
X Link 2026-02-11T13:57Z 21.7K followers, 258.4K engagements

"GLM [--] is a benchmark beast that can't survive real work. I spent a day testing it. Here's what happened: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: Tied with Claude Opus [---] at [--]. Only [--] points behind Opus [---]. Bridge Bench (real world coding tasks): Claude Opus 4.6: [----] score [---] sec avg response GPT [---] Codex: [----] score [----] sec avg response GLM 5: [----] score [-----] sec avg response GLM [--] only completed [--] out of [---] tasks. Benchmarks lie. Production doesn't. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021958635572638105 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021958635572638105"
X Link 2026-02-12T14:44Z 21.7K followers, 113.4K engagements

"Gemini [--] Deep Think just launched It achieved a score of [----] on Codeforces This is the best score ever recorded LFG"
X Link 2026-02-12T16:53Z 21.7K followers, 14.4K engagements

"Day [---] of vibe coding an app until I make $1000000. Current revenue: $40207.80 Today's build: Refactoring BridgeSpace from Electron to Tauri for blazing-fast performance and smaller builds. Models on deck: GLM [--] MiniMax M2.5 GPT [---] Codex Spark Claude Opus [---] Gemini [--] Deep Think. Testing them all live. Expanding the BridgeBench leaderboard. The grind: [---] likes = live cold plunge [---] pushups + [--] pullups $959792.20 to go. Live at 10:30am EST. https://youtube.com/live/AqAVsTVmbeE https://youtube.com/live/AqAVsTVmbeE"
X Link 2026-02-13T14:28Z 21.7K followers, [----] engagements

"GPT [---] Codex Spark is fast but not smart. I gave [--] models the same prompt: Create a hot air balloon ride in HTML. Claude Opus 4.6: Beautiful night scene with colorful balloon. Nailed it. GLM 5: Vibrant sunset with detailed balloon and basket. Great. MiniMax M2.5: Dreamy clouds and mountains. GPT [---] Codex Spark: Grey sky no balloon just bubbles. Complete hallucination. This is what happens when you trade intelligence for speed. [----] tokens per second means nothing if the model can't follow a basic prompt. Spark is 15x faster than standard Codex. But it lost too much capability in the"
X Link 2026-02-13T18:50Z 21.7K followers, [----] engagements

"10 hours left to submit. The BridgeMind Vibeathon closes tonight at 11:59 PM PST. $5000 in prizes: 1st: $2500 2nd: $1500 3rd: $1000 The challenge: Build an open source tool that makes vibe coders unstoppable. Top winners get invited to demo live on the BridgeMind stream. Submit your repo + a 3-5 minute demo video. If you've been building now's the time. http://bridgemind.ai/vibeathon http://bridgemind.ai/vibeathon"
X Link 2026-02-14T21:39Z 21.7K followers, [----] engagements

"This week was an avalanche of AI model releases. I tested all of them. GPT [---] Codex Spark. GLM [--]. MiniMax M2.5. Gemini [--] Deep Think. I put them through BridgeBench to separate the real models from the benchmark beasts. One draws upside down fish. One can't spell a 4-letter word. One runs at [----] tokens/sec but hallucinates everything. Only one scored [----] on Codeforces and actually delivered in production. The BridgeMind Vibeathon hit [--] submissions. Awards week starts now. Full breakdown here: https://youtu.be/YUP-J0_R3Lc https://youtu.be/YUP-J0_R3Lc"
X Link 2026-02-15T18:49Z 21.7K followers, [----] engagements

"I asked GPT [---] Codex Spark to pour me a cup of coffee. It gave me a glowing orb and a white box. Same prompt to Claude Opus [---]. French press glass mug steam saucer. Exactly what I asked for. Codex Spark is OpenAI's speed play. [----] tokens/sec on Cerebras hardware. 15x faster than standard Codex. But speed doesn't matter if the model hallucinates the entire prompt. Vibe coding requires models that understand what you want. Not models that race to give you the wrong answer"
X Link 2026-02-15T19:12Z 21.7K followers, [----] engagements

"The DeepSeek V4 leak has been confirmed fake. The AIME [----] score of 99.4% isn't possible under the official scoring system. But DeepSeek V4 is still coming. V3.2 already hits 73.1% on SWE-Bench Verified. DeepSeek has been on a tear. DeekSeek V4 is expected to challenge Claude Opus [---] and GPT [---] Codex directly. And likely blow past MiniMax M2.5 and GLM [--]. The leaked numbers were fake. The model is real. Only time will tell what it can actually do. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023377342450618603 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023377342450618603"
X Link 2026-02-16T12:42Z 21.7K followers, [----] engagements

"Day [---] Vibe Coding an App Until I Make $1000000 Revenue: $40560.59 Stream starts at 10:30am EST Launch OpenClaw bots (Elon Sam Dario) for 24/7 autonomous tasks Push BridgeSpace performance update Integrate Sentry + PostHog for production monitoring Benchmark Qwen [---] Plus against Claude Opus [---] and GPT [---] Codex Ship to production The grind: [---] pushups live [---] likes = live Vibeathon entry reviews $959439.41 to go. Let's build. https://www.youtube.com/watchv=OX6d6b623Ek https://www.youtube.com/watchv=OX6d6b623Ek"
X Link 2026-02-16T14:39Z 21.7K followers, [----] engagements

"BridgeMind website visits are skyrocketing. 8K active users. 65K events. 7.9K new users. Event count up 3261500% from last period. No paid ads. No influencer deals. Just building in public and shipping every day. The vibe coding movement is real. http://bridgemind.ai http://bridgemind.ai"
X Link 2026-02-16T16:31Z 21.7K followers, [----] engagements

"GLM [--] ranks #3 in DesignArena. Above Gemini [--] Pro. Above MiniMax M2.5. Above GPT [---]. Elo rating: [----] across 888K votes. Only Claude Opus [---] and Claude Opus [---] Thinking rank higher. This is a $1/$3.20 per million token model competing with the most expensive frontier models in design and creative tasks. Zhipu built something special. The benchmarks are catching up to what I've been seeing in BridgeBench. GLM [--] is the most underrated model right now. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023502317727646089 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023502317727646089"
X Link 2026-02-16T20:58Z 21.7K followers, 12.8K engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing