@Piripindulki John ToddJohn Todd posts on X about bitcoin, ordinals, sats, core the most. They currently have [--] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [--] engagements in the last [--] hours.
Social category influence cryptocurrencies 54% finance 8% fashion brands 2% celebrities 1% technology brands 1%
Social topic influence bitcoin 49%, ordinals 14%, sats 9%, core 7%, spam 4%, money 4%, exchanges 4%, if you 2%, onchain 2%, culture 2%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @felipecreate @boomerbtc @hustlebitch @lukedashjr @ostrom72158 @sodiumbtc21 @balkanhodl @axexang @satflation @lukedewolf @murchandamus @asanohagold @wsbitcoin @dudejlebowski @hodlingbtc @axelmakaroff @adam3us @grassfedbitcoin @zhoyunchng1984 @jammycreamer
Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) Ethereum (ETH)
Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours
"@asanoha_gold Let me ask you very controversial question. Be honest. If Epstein inscribed all videos and photos on bitcoin ordinals would he potentially be arrested faster and more children were saved"
X Link 2026-02-08T09:41Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@w_s_bitcoin This question is for [---] pussies who wont buy [---] coin wont sell core coin.only signal with their nodes safely lol"
X Link 2026-02-10T19:46Z [--] followers, [---] engagements
"@DelcinMaria fyi you referencing here the shittiest ordinals platform π"
X Link 2026-02-11T00:11Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@elkrun21 Can you update us if ordinals over [----] sats is a spam already or not yet according to your cult"
X Link 2026-02-11T18:08Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@btcefe Ordinals wallet became irrelevant in [----] spammers stopped using their garbage platform and it probably was sold to a bunch of idiots who call themselves blockrunner. Spammers DGAF about their opinions.knotzis do π"
X Link 2026-02-11T19:33Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@ShareBullsLove I just learned all the players in the roster before the deadline. Then had to scan fuck these new kids can do. Well nba became garbage long ago. This bulls are garbage inside the garbage league"
X Link 2026-02-12T09:18Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@JammyCreamer Curious whats a "long term durable substance" for you"
X Link 2026-02-12T11:08Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@BitcoinMotorist @BitMEXResearch @ToneVays "Spam" on bitcoin is such a slick concept that it has to meet a certain size requirement to qualify for a spam lol Spam emails with empty body must be not big enough to qualify for a spam following your logic"
X Link 2026-02-14T08:59Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@balkanhodl @hodlonaut @giacomozucco Study bitcoin harder"
X Link 2026-02-14T18:30Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@DanWolken Make a draft [--] years from the season that decides the draft order. Problem solved. Exp. this season standings apply to 2028-29 draft"
X Link 2026-02-15T09:46Z [--] followers, [----] engagements
"@BitcoinJed1 Yeah core v30 imposing retarded tariffs on US alleys lol"
X Link 2025-11-19T22:50Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@MalachiRevolts @sashahodler Your learn bitcoin in real time π Bitcoin governance is not a community. Its "no governance". Contentious disagreements only can be resolved by a fork. Or they aren't contentious. Contentious forks are an organic conclusion to settle beef. Market is the only true consensus data"
X Link 2025-11-20T19:29Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@MalachiRevolts @sashahodler If you want unity and other consensus models like voting then Decred with onchain governance is probably better for that since its hard fork resistant and doesn't split a chain. In bitcoin if you go full retard mechanic mode you create a fork and vote with your money π€·π½"
X Link 2025-11-20T19:33Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@lifofifo @cguida6 But ordinals started a pump from 20k ser lol Knotzi please fork off"
X Link 2025-11-21T03:50Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@DudeJLebowski π More publicity for ordinals π€·π½"
X Link 2025-11-21T17:50Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@BTCtoOblivion @dathon_ohm You make a conspiracy out of people wanting to know who is that guy who pushes a contentious soft fork on bitcoin lmao"
X Link 2025-11-22T17:37Z [--] followers, [---] engagements
"@nic__carter A- trading will not stop. The most important. The market will not have a downtime. People can totally pause pushing txns on btc network for couple of hours during which exchanges will make a tone of money on "dumping war instruments". 51% attack on [---] or URSF will happen fast"
X Link 2025-11-23T08:05Z [--] followers, [---] engagements
"@vashshawn @knutsvanholm @felipecreate @aantonop They can write [--] books on bitcoin culture and vibes and still dont get bitcoin π π"
X Link 2025-11-26T03:00Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@venorusprime Good thing consensus rejected this [---] bull crap before AA even spoke"
X Link 2025-11-26T03:12Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@w_s_bitcoin @CapitalSatoshi @Aureliushodl21 Rednecks are triggered when see themselves in the mirror π"
X Link 2025-11-26T18:40Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@satflation There we go so we have a widespread consensus even among the purest knotzis that ONLY the state truly incentivized to attack bitcoin with a csam smear campaign. Now tell me genius if virtually everyone knows its some state(s) who makes this attack what will be the outcome"
X Link 2025-11-26T19:36Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@satflation And thats even without factoring in competitive nature between governments and a game theory with follow up complex dynamics. Like too many governments will be happy to buy cheap bitcoin and run a shame political campaign on these attackers etc"
X Link 2025-11-26T19:40Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@satflation Common sense is trying to move spam into opreturn. Changing bitcoin that opens up even more a vector attack thru devs is not going to fly with most of people"
X Link 2025-11-26T19:57Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@satflation You go in circles. Anyway bitcoin will not change to your preferences no matter how hard you spread these false narratives"
X Link 2025-11-26T20:42Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@ProofOfCash @attorneysanders @nitesh_btc I dont know.some bitcoin maxis a bit confused and just struggle with reality lol"
X Link 2025-11-27T03:45Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@ProofOfCash @attorneysanders @nitesh_btc Ordinal bitcoiners get it better than knotzis lol"
X Link 2025-11-27T04:13Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@felipecreate @simulx4 @_DavidSFreeman [---] million + garbage inscriptions made your bitcoin useless π Great example of "I don't really understand the subject Im here for the culture" Thats meme community way to lose money"
X Link 2025-11-27T18:52Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@DudeJLebowski It appears knotzi had low integrity beliefs all alone"
X Link 2025-11-27T18:54Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@parman_the @DudeJLebowski I'll break it down for you π€‘ btcd client devs were removed from core discussions. They were saying about core exact same things you are parroting now."core hijacked bitcoin" etc. Then big blockers were saying those narratives about core centralization. [---] will be another shit"
X Link 2025-11-28T09:55Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@LukeDashjr @Hodling_btc @axel_makaroff Arbitrary data prayers completely different from spam Interesting. Like its not arbitrary Its not data"
X Link 2025-11-28T10:41Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@LukeDashjr @Hodling_btc @axel_makaroff So all arbitrary data in op_return within the limit before V30 merge is "completely different" from spam"
X Link 2025-11-28T10:49Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@LukeDashjr @Hodling_btc @axel_makaroff But op_return is for arbitrary data too therefore arbitrary data is intended to be there"
X Link 2025-11-28T11:08Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@kretchino Alternative clients are available since like [----] dumb ass lol"
X Link 2025-11-28T19:22Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@boomer_btc @HustleBitch_ Here This is bonkers. A Bitcoin wallet was just discovered from [----] that only has [----] sats and [----] of them are uncommon sats Meaning he was separating rare sats from UTXOs [--] years before the launch of Ordinals wtf https://t.co/9uNcDTCB6y This is bonkers. A Bitcoin wallet was just discovered from [----] that only has [----] sats and [----] of them are uncommon sats Meaning he was separating rare sats from UTXOs [--] years before the launch of Ordinals wtf https://t.co/9uNcDTCB6y"
X Link 2025-11-30T08:21Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@boomer_btc @HustleBitch_ I dont disagree bitcoin protocol doesn't present sats in a serial fashion. I know sats are created monolithic with each new block. And I know who Im asking) BTC protocol doesn't need to number sats for collectors to find themπ€·π½β The fact that an external layer does it makes it a"
X Link 2025-11-30T19:08Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@boomer_btc @HustleBitch_ beautiful L2 design. Numbering sats uses basic math logic just like bitcoin does. I dont need a miner expertise to know -the total number of satoshis that will ever exist almost [--] trillion -each bitcoin has 100mil sats -There was 1st bitcoin ever created. There will be last"
X Link 2025-11-30T19:22Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@boomer_btc @HustleBitch_ .sats ever create. - People will pay premium for this bitcoin sats. -Ordinals protocol will be there to help them with that lol Collectors figuring out numbering outside of L1 protocol was the matter of time. Its still real satoshis created at certain point in time. Demand"
X Link 2025-11-30T19:30Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@boomer_btc @HustleBitch_ .for block [--] sats currently only proves collectors nature goes nowhere. btw how many bitcoiners know sats from block [--] traded at x1000 tag on em still Those are real bitcoin transferred from satoshi to hal. And the last argument. Secretary of Treasury doesn't track"
X Link 2025-11-30T19:38Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"Since retard in the header post blocked me Ill respond here. There would be if core didn't remove alternative client devs from conversations. Just like they did with knotzis this time. @Piripindulki @kretchino There are no completely 100% consensus covering alternatives to Bitcoin Core. Not even close. @Piripindulki @kretchino There are no completely 100% consensus covering alternatives to Bitcoin Core. Not even close"
X Link 2025-11-30T19:56Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@boomer_btc @HustleBitch_ Im gonna have to agree on misleading promotions. 99% of rare sats aren't rare and worth just its base bitcoin value. And the market will rug those bringing collectibles on bitcoin to a tiny fraction to even what it is now. I doubt it bloat utxo in any meaningful way then"
X Link 2025-11-30T20:48Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@boomer_btc @HustleBitch_ I meant L2 as if satoshi numbering is off chain. What do you mean "no settlement on the base layer" Rare sats are moved on a base layer. If ord client shots down rare sats stay in the wallet and go nowhere"
X Link 2025-11-30T20:54Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@boomer_btc @HustleBitch_ Common fees are bitcoin that was in a subsidy already before that block. So they already have a number. Sir all numbers are already known and exist even for those bitcoin that hasn't created yet. From genesis 100mill satoshis to the very last mined satoshis. Subsidy not claimed"
X Link 2025-11-30T22:14Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@boomer_btc @HustleBitch_ Bitcoin protocol doesn't. But ord client already tracks these "fee" satoshis that are added to subsidy since they were in a subsidy themselves. before they became "fees". Logically without going under the hood of ord client(not that im capable of lol thats why tagged quary) Id"
X Link 2025-11-30T22:53Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@lukedewolf @adam3us @murchandamus @felipecreate Censorship resistant is the most valuable property of bitcoin π But yeah lets chop it a bit so more people have cleaner nodes π"
X Link 2025-12-01T21:32Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@GrassFedBitcoin Yeah no fucking way people just HODL bitcoin as digital gold and dont want/cant spend it yetπ"
X Link 2025-12-02T07:13Z [--] followers, [---] engagements
"@BitmapSunset How do you think how many bitmap holders want that"
X Link 2025-12-04T20:40Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@BTCBreadMan @RepJayapal Crossing the boarder is criminal. Being on US soil is a civil violation. Two aren't the same. Many immigrants crossed the boarder legally and overstayed. "All illegal immigrants are criminals" is factual false statement. They aren't by law"
X Link 2025-12-05T03:07Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@balkanhodl Actually soft fork [---] will turn bitcoin into worthless shitcoin"
X Link 2025-12-05T16:27Z [--] followers, [---] engagements
"@Justagrillguycr @balkanhodl By inserting morals layer into censorship resistant network idiots"
X Link 2025-12-05T20:26Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@dathon_ohm πThat implies bitcoin is money and not a data storage now. And it will stay like that without consensus rule changes"
X Link 2025-12-05T20:43Z [--] followers, [---] engagements
"@Justagrillguycr @balkanhodl Bitcoin: Morally and legally compliant peer-to-peer electronic cash. you like that one better obviously lol"
X Link 2025-12-05T21:34Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@allenf32 Lol "you can disagree on what morals to prioritize" is exactly why bitcoin isn't about morals and should not be"
X Link 2025-12-06T09:24Z [--] followers, [---] engagements
"@allenf32 It's fascinating to watch how bitcoin bred bitcoin moralists and now moralists claim bitcoin is about morals lol Like fuck this nasty honey badger He too nasty and greedy lol"
X Link 2025-12-06T09:33Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@GoldLeader89 Its a stupid argument because running a node has no economic incentive to store other people monetary transactions either"
X Link 2025-12-06T17:57Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@LukeDashjr @factoroftime @AGInoMETRICS As far as Im aware you are not running a major exchange to be so sure which chain will keep BTC ticker. And they will be in a position to decide that. If support for chains splits evenly shit will get messy and chaotic"
X Link 2025-12-07T05:24Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@zhoyunchng1984 @ostrom72158 academical enough to make a conclusion specialized hardware wasnt his intention for the design. Thats what I meant initially when I said 1PC-1vote his desire for broader mining decentralization not quite centralized mining due to asics. But again you seems to confused threadsπ"
X Link 2025-12-08T07:15Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@zhoyunchng1984 @ostrom72158 Its pretty obvious still with quite centralized mining that number of "boxes that dont mine blocks" is huge if not the biggest factor of what makes bitcoin network truly censorship resistant. I dont give a flying fuck if it was only appeared in [----]. Asics popped around same time"
X Link 2025-12-08T07:26Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@atrasdoarwario @ostrom72158 That "upgrade" will take years to refine debate and never happen eventually. Holders will have enough time to make new utxos for worthy artworks with [----] sats. MARA single handedly will do that for ordinals folks for peanuts. This brute solution racking consensus will fail at"
X Link 2025-12-08T16:55Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@atrasdoarwario @ostrom72158 Dynamic mechanism with manual snapshots when inscriptions too hyped Dynamic mechanism for ordinals dynamic mechanism created in the future to avoid cat lol Yeah this totally sounds like pro bitcoin ossification moves lol"
X Link 2025-12-09T08:07Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@asanoha_gold @Relentless_btc @stutxo @ostrom72158 @start9labs @kelo6102 @L0RINC I didn't know you hate bitcoin so much"
X Link 2025-12-09T08:17Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@ProfessorBigz @_DavidSFreeman *Celsius room"
X Link 2025-12-09T10:39Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@sodiumbtc21 The very reason they are valuable is because they are on an immutable chain. Making a chain censorable by activating [---] will make them worthless on [---] shitcoin chain. The cat is overkill and not needed after [---] activation π"
X Link 2025-12-09T10:47Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@axexang @sodiumbtc21 Idiot there is virtually no chance bitcoin can become a "simple database" for it to stop being immutable even if all blocks are full with jpegs for an eternity. Thats why we have a block size. Again as soon as btc stops being immutable all arbitrary data becomes worthless"
X Link 2025-12-09T18:22Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@axexang @sodiumbtc21 Again bitcoin has a small blocksize already. It can be reduced even further. Making a designs with a hope it isnt used for a full capacity in order to survive is only makes sense in knotzi brains. As for [---] it changes shittone of code = automatic shitcoin if ever activated"
X Link 2025-12-09T19:57Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@axexang @sodiumbtc21 I say"simple database" argument is stupid after segwit2x wars. I understand its very hard to comprehend but bitcoin is not for jpegs yet it is and you can do NOTHING without racking consensus rules fundamentally only to get a SHOT lol"
X Link 2025-12-09T20:17Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@axexang @sodiumbtc21 And why you didn't rise up back then again oh yeah not toxic enough i guess"
X Link 2025-12-09T22:05Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@axexang @sodiumbtc21 Good luck. Home you don't break your bitcoin and it doesn't become worthless"
X Link 2025-12-09T22:14Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@asanoha_gold Nothing good. Draconian trade offs yet it will fail in what runes succeed over a year ago. Namely killed trust in brc20 market (90% of all inscriptions). Onchain data has receipts"
X Link 2025-12-09T23:42Z [--] followers, [---] engagements
"@DukeDukingtonRD @Loriss65 @adam3us @LukeDashjr @amkangas @BryanBSolstin @lukedewolf Or maybe you have no clue about the type of spams how they work onchainwhat they used for primarily and what are possible solutions to prevent harm from them. Its ok. Time for you to learn how bitcoin works now"
X Link 2025-12-11T21:32Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@loshmi Check for mold exposure toxic overload check if you have sensitivity to EMF cut gluten and optimize diet maybe check for SIBO and SIFO. Anyway this sounds like chronic so a functional medicine doctors will guide well through healing process"
X Link 2025-12-12T09:43Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@lukedewolf @saylor @WhatisMoneyShow Might want to dig into history of development as well. In particular times when developers disagreed with core and left/expelled to create other projects (Decred Ethereum) or forked off(BCH BSV). Maximalism by definition will have discrepancies with the reality"
X Link 2025-12-13T08:00Z [--] followers, [---] engagements
"@lukedewolf @adam3us @murchandamus @coinjoined Cmon it took rodarmor probably a year to complete Runes protocol. You expect all these bs protocols to pop up within few months to justify recent op_return change"
X Link 2025-12-14T07:13Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@CBRobber Keep in mind its [---] sats/vb sometimes"
X Link 2025-12-16T03:02Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@ToneVays @LukeDashjr @jimmysong @murchandamus @knutsvanholm @giacomozucco @parkeralewis Ordinals added thousands of nodes. You dont have economic incentive to store ordinals. They do have it"
X Link 2025-12-19T23:24Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@GrassFedBitcoin Im cool with banning anyone who proposes to confiscate bitcoin"
X Link 2025-12-25T05:14Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"For all miserable republican imbeciles who dont think its a murder. ".and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.""
X Link 2026-01-09T08:30Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@CalebFC18 bears move out another team will slide in in 2-3 years. bears doesnt have a leverage until maybe they win a superbowl"
X Link 2026-01-17T18:25Z [--] followers, [---] engagements
"@EnterTheWombat @CalebFC18 I said another team will slide in and builds a stadium in actual Chicago or suburbs and Bears become 100% indiana team from that point"
X Link 2026-01-18T05:09Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@hodlonaut @aeonBTC You guys are Jehovah witnesses of bitcoin. On a chain that was designed with GREED as a core human behavior to make it secure"
X Link 2026-01-27T10:32Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@felipecreate @aeonBTC ordinals and runes txs are fake economic activity Nodes run by ordinal and runes folks are 100x more "economically active" than all knot nodes combined. Ordinals and runes active nodes make it harder for a government to span nodes and force their narratives onto btc"
X Link 2026-01-28T19:56Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@balkanhodl @bitcoincoreorg hang tight when exchanges list [---] shitcoin for trading π"
X Link 2026-01-29T20:43Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@murchandamus @peterktodd you believe exchanges will not list [---] for trading long before the activation date why CEXs trading does not happen on chain they can easily split the trading long before chain splits. And the market is the final consensus decider no"
X Link 2026-01-30T18:09Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@SameeLiaei I said citrea is dead on the arrival because bitcoin is a store of value and too expensive and too slow for that sort of garbage that cant compete with blockchains that were designed for this type of shit from day [--]. You too shallow to understand it"
X Link 2026-01-31T10:37Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@TheBoozles You missed BCH fork buddy it was their main argument to fork off π"
X Link 2026-01-31T17:47Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@felipecreate You are an attack on bitcoin because you dont have a consensus for a fork. Simple"
X Link 2026-01-31T18:59Z [--] followers, [---] engagements
"@felipecreate Im glad you understand it doesn't have a consensus today. So you dont twist shit in the future"
X Link 2026-01-31T19:05Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@felipecreate Dont you think bitcoin users dont want bitcoin to be censorship resistant and without bull crap monthly updates to keep it spam free lol"
X Link 2026-01-31T19:21Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@felipecreate I prefer bitcoin consensus decides what transactions are in your node. We are not the same"
X Link 2026-01-31T19:39Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@flaming_hodl nonsense"
X Link 2026-02-01T07:34Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@felipecreate do you realize [---] will have more spam on it than core if it ever splits π"
X Link 2026-02-02T18:32Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@MlCHlELMlTCHELL @felipecreate Exchanges decide which coin will have a "BTC" ticker"
X Link 2026-02-02T18:43Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@CunyRenaud Unfortunately the game theory is not that shallow simple lol"
X Link 2026-02-02T18:48Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@BitMEXResearch @theonevortex @jabulanijakes [---] supporters are here for good vibes not some "phony" markets π"
X Link 2026-02-02T19:03Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@cguida6 You dont know the difference between a consensus and an attack on bitcoin"
X Link 2026-02-03T22:31Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@nicklefrit1375 @JAYChi_Bulls @ShamsCharania Can someone explain it to me how 1st round picks are better than already battle tested players picked in the 1st round top [--] like Jaden Ivey People who never played game are so fixed with 1st round picks"
X Link 2026-02-04T21:08Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@btctrek Ordinals: rug harder"
X Link 2026-02-08T09:12Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@blockdyor @btcbongo They quite literally on chain as long as bitcoin blocks minedπ"
X Link 2026-02-08T09:16Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@BitcoinMotorist @OCM_529 Spammers quite literally paid for blockspace. There is no "storage fees" in bitcoin consensus rules"
X Link 2026-02-08T09:34Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@wyatt_earp @CagedSings @brian_trollz @DavidFBailey @w_s_bitcoin @1914ad @Shireh0dl @GrassFedBitcoin Eth and Sol are garbage. Not a SoV. Cant attach art to the 1st ever transection blk [--] sats. Ordinals protocol cooked you mfkers so goodπWorth collecting great art just for that reason alone lol Bitcoin is a digital gold. Everyone of you cocks use it to hodl savings n parroting"
X Link 2025-10-26T07:38Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
"@zhoyunchng1984 @ostrom72158 Just reread everything from the top. Why you sound like a Bcasher in Bitcoin thread lol Yes I didn't quote [--] CPU-1 vote precisely bcoz i dont pray on WP for years every week like you do. At the time of writing CPU was PC. And he didn't mention GPU once in WP you seems"
X Link 2025-12-08T07:08Z [--] followers, [--] engagements
Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing