[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@OlekChaseCar Oleksandr Chase CarOleksandr Chase Car posts on X about youtube, ai, spam, ceo the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence social networks #3664 technology brands #3979
Social topic influence youtube #1893, ai #1421, spam #514, ceo #2176, build a, the first, the official, the olympics, proof of, pinterest
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"YouTube can build a whole Recap feature which no one asked for just to show you what you watched. But they can't show terminated/demonetized creators a single timestamp of what they violated - something creators have been begging for for a decade. They have billions for new features and tech to track everything for marketing but $X for transparency when a creators livelihood is on the line. #YouTubeAIWrongedCreators Inspired by @FinalVerdictYT β€"
X Link 2025-12-05T07:30Z XXX followers, 28.1K engagements
"π¨ YouTube's AI "logic" has reached peak absurdity: β‘ Creator makes original content β‘ Someone steals it and gets banned β‘ YouTube bans the ORIGINAL creator for "reuploading" their own stolen content β‘ The video has their watermark on it. The watermark is literally RIGHT THERE Make it make sense This is the "improved AI" they keep celebrating. And they wonder why creators are terrified. The system can't tell: β Original from stolen β Creator from thief β Victim from violator I myself spent X months legally defeating YouTube just to prove their AI was wrong. Won the case. Got the decision."
X Link 2025-12-10T18:26Z XXX followers, 124.2K engagements
"π¨ In the first X months of 2025 YouTube's AI system terminated 5003437 YouTube channels. That means: β‘ 27643 terminated channels every single day. β‘ 1151 terminated channels every single hour. β‘ XX channels banned for life every single minute. And since YouTube's automation system typically terminates even MORE channels in the second half of the year you can likely double those numbers right now. At this very moment by the time you finish reading this tweet YouTube's AI will terminate another XXX channels give or take. XXXX% of those bans were for Spam deceptive practices & scams - a"
X Link 2025-11-29T04:30Z XXX followers, 125K engagements
"π¨ Everyone told me a small creator can't legally beat YouTube. I proved them wrong. WON the case. Got the official decision. π€― Turns out the REAL impossible part isn't winning. It's getting YouTube to acknowledge you WON. This story proves YouTube's system is designed to crush the creator. Here's what happened when I fought back: π JUNE 2024: I get the email every creator dreads. My channel is demonetized for "reused content." I fight back. I appeal and luckily get a human review. A HUMAN at YouTube actually reviews my work. My editing timeline my scripts my voiceovers. They see it all"
X Link 2025-12-10T01:25Z XXX followers, 138.2K engagements
"π₯Imagine winning a Gold Medal at the Olympics and being immediately banned for life because you "ran too fast." That is YouTube in 2025. YouTube's AI has reached a point where organic growth looks like "spam" to the sensors. The system is eating its own winners. This is the 5th creator this week with the exact same story β
YouTube built an AI to protect the platform from bad actors. β Instead it became the bad actor. βNow creators need protection from the thing that was supposed to protect them. I myself spent X months legally defeating YouTube just to prove their AI was wrong. Won the case."
X Link 2025-12-11T04:11Z XXX followers, 3988 engagements
"π¨ EXPOSED: YouTube is ignoring the Law. I have the legal document to prove it. π YouTube terminated my channel calling it "Spam" "Deceptive & Scam." π’ The European Union Certified Dispute Body reviewed my content and found the OPPOSITE: my content is LEGIT. YouTube's automated system refused to listen when I appealed and provided proof that I followed the policies. My appeal was rejected instantly. So I filed a legal case with an official European Union certified dispute body under the EU Digital Services Act. HERE IS WHAT THE INDEPENDENT ADJUDICATOR FOUND (See Screenshot): X I am"
X Link 2025-12-08T03:06Z XXX followers, 38.8K engagements
"Can we have this F**KING button for YouTube content moderation"
X Link 2025-12-11T05:43Z XXX followers, 1512 engagements
"I did what XX% of creators think is impossible - I legally defeated YouTube. How does YouTube react They're pretending it never happened. Let me tell you a story that proves the system is designed to crush creators - even when you WIN legal case and the law is on your side π β‘ June 2024: My channel "Chase Car" (20k subs) gets demonetized for "reused content." I appeal. A HUMAN reviewer checks everything - my editing timeline voiceovers scripts. They email me: "This is original content you follow all the guidelines." Monetization restored. I'm relieved. A human verified me. I'm safe now. β‘"
X Link 2025-12-01T01:39Z XXX followers, 713K engagements
"My legal VICTORY against YouTube is now officially trending on X and across the industry. The YouTuber mentioned in the @Dexerto article It's me A couple of days ago marked exactly one year since YouTube terminated my channel. During that year I did something most creators think is impossible: I won a legal case against YouTube via a European Union certified dispute body. They reviewed everything and made the decision - the termination of my channel was NOT RIGHTFUL and the channel should be reinstated. @TeamYouTube - if you really wanted so much to punish me for something believe me you've"
X Link 2025-12-02T06:33Z XXX followers, 532.1K engagements
"π¨ YouTube's CEO celebrates AI precision π While I'm sitting here with a legal decision proving their AI terminated my channel and destroyed my YouTube career by mistake. "AI will make our ability better more precise" @nealmohan Is that a joke Then why did a small creator like me have to legally defeat YouTube to prove them wrong Your "precise" AI: β Terminated my channel after a human from YouTube approved my content β Ignoring the legal decision that says my content is legitimate β Can't show a single piece of evidence that I violated anything β Has ghosted me for over X months since I got"
X Link 2025-12-09T04:11Z XXX followers, 15.6K engagements
"@mister_manners_ @BrodyFoxx @thedarkarchive4 @Animeako126 @FinalVerdictYT @TypicalFemboy69 @NotMatrixFR @chloe_xozy @AdvisVerse That's the part that breaks people's brains. "Wait you WON legally and they still won't." Yep. X months and counting"
X Link 2025-12-10T03:49Z XXX followers, 2901 engagements
"π£MoistCr1TiKaL: "It should be ILLEGAL for AI to ban YouTube channels" β Fun fact: It IS already ILLEGAL at least in Europe. The Law: Digital Services Act (DSA) The Article: Article XX Paragraph X β
What it says: Decisions to suspend or terminate accounts "shall be taken under the supervision of appropriately qualified staff and not solely on the basis of automated means." But YouTube constantly breaks the law and doesn't seem to care. The problem is even worse than that. AI isn't just the executioner it's also the appeals process the evidence locker and the record keeper. Unfortunately AI"
X Link 2025-12-10T21:22Z XXX followers, 365.9K engagements
"YouTube is screwed either way. Blame the AI or blame the human review Both failed a test so easy it's embarrassing to fail Okay so let me get this straight. YouTube just admitted their HUMAN REVIEWERS looked at a close-up of someone laughing and marked it as "violent/graphic content." A HUMAN Looked at LAUGHTER And saw VIOLENCE I'm gonna need everyone to understand how insane this is. Was it the same human who "carefully reviewed and confirmed" channel terminations Maybe this is the SAME system that banned MY channel I spent X months legally fighting YouTube just to prove their AI was wrong."
X Link 2025-12-13T01:01Z XXX followers, 439.6K engagements