@rajwinder Rajwinder Singh

Rajwinder Singh posts on X about bitcoin, money, core, spam the most. They currently have [-------] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [-----] engagements in the last [--] hours.

Engagements: [-----] #

Mentions: [--] #

Followers: [-------] #

CreatorRank: [---------] #

Social Influence

Social category influence cryptocurrencies finance stocks technology brands social networks countries automotive brands exchanges us election currencies

Social topic influence bitcoin, money, core, spam, satoshi, the white, this is, instead of, devs, rescue

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @wsbitcoin @nickszabo4 @adam3us @stephanlivera @barackomaba @giacomozucco @grassfedbitcoin @notgrubles @checkmatey @cguida6 @kyletorpey @bitmexresearch @supertestnet @simulx4 @majorianbtc @pakovm @jakeblockchain @crypt0e @money2bmrdredby @volpelp

Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) FTX Token (FTT) Strategy (MSTR) CLEANSPARK INC (CLSK) Grayscale BTC ETF (GBTC) FilesCoins Power Cu (FILECOIN) MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) Western Union Co (WU) Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"Wow $FTT #Alameda #FTX #BINANCE"
X Link 2022-11-08T06:12Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@bradmillscan [---] Favorite Quotes from the Bitcoin Standard by @ydemombynes"
X Link 2023-12-16T03:06Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@IIICapital $MSTR and $CLSK Bought the latter when they put @Amanda_Cavaleri on their Board"
X Link 2024-03-26T22:51Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@HODL15Capital Doesn't matter what the net flows are because the flows are strong in a clear direction and $GBTC daily withdrawals are erratic"
X Link 2024-03-26T22:56Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"#Bitcoin ETFs trade [--] days a week while new Bitcoin production is [--] days per week. Remember to apply this correction factor of [-----] to the average daily BTC ingestion rate of ETFs. It doesn't change the qualitative discussion but is not insignificant"
X Link 2024-04-01T01:24Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@LynAldenContact Ueda San stop trying to make fetch happen"
X Link 2024-05-04T00:21Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@TheBitcoinLayer Fantastic explainer Nik. Thanks"
X Link 2024-06-06T05:01Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@intangiblecoins Distraction"
X Link 2024-11-13T22:54Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@DSBatten @realjelers They shouldn't be loading up on debt except on Saylor-like terms"
X Link 2024-12-19T22:46Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Pledditor @NeilJacobs Trump WAS or IS BEING pitched the idea by Saylor is what is happening. Of course Forbes misleadingly sensationalizes the truth"
X Link 2024-12-22T19:41Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@PunterJeff @Danima777 Many 401k providers (such as Fidelity) have "tunnels" through which you can access a huge universe of investment choices including Bitcoin ETFs. At Fidelity ask for BrokerageLink"
X Link 2025-04-13T21:33Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@cryptoquick @cguida6 @murchandamus @StackingSaunter @TheMatrixDr @TheGuySwann No we don't want to relay spam"
X Link 2025-09-08T14:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@nitesh_btc @theothermjordan No mempool policy can prevent private mempools a la slipstream. The answer is not to throw the entire network open to spam and create a massive new attack surface. I do not want to relay garbage. That people are picking Knots as an alternative is ENTIRELY on Core. Big mistake"
X Link 2025-09-26T10:57Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@kyletorpey Overblown is still [--] A dangerously vulnerable attack surface is being created for absolutely zero benefit to the monetary network"
X Link 2025-10-01T20:41Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@xstoicunicornx @kyletorpey There's a difference between a matchbox and a stock of dynamite"
X Link 2025-10-02T01:18Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@xstoicunicornx @kyletorpey Default config matters"
X Link 2025-10-02T01:49Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@heavilyarmedc @NickSzabo4 As a node runner I do not want to relay spam especially CSAM. Increasing default setting of datacsrriersize to enable spam/CSAM is utterly deranged. Nothing justifies it"
X Link 2025-10-02T06:23Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@alvesgjs @adam3us Bitcoin is a monetary network on a timechain. Uncensorability of monetary txs is a key priority. Why do we care about censoring of garbage data We should want it to be censored by all of the network participants"
X Link 2025-10-04T01:17Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Motomanjake @GrassFedBitcoin @NickSzabo4 Bitcoin is a monetary network. It's not a p2p porn relay service"
X Link 2025-10-06T17:16Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@notgrubles @NickSzabo4 @_bholm @Rombbb_Gaming @asanoha_gold Nothing justifies relaying CSAM. Enabling that feature BY DEFAULT is an unforgivable attack on the network"
X Link 2025-10-06T17:22Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@BTC_Archive Make it a poll"
X Link 2025-10-06T23:47Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@BitMEXResearch @BikesandBitcoin @boomer_btc What % of mining hash is planning to hash just one block and then never mine again It's negligible. Therefore the Todd view is only a theoretical limiting case not anything that happens even remotely in reality"
X Link 2025-10-07T07:43Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@BitMEXResearch @BikesandBitcoin @boomer_btc The reality lies somewhere on the line segment connecting the Tood and Hearn points. And it's not close to either point"
X Link 2025-10-07T07:45Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@mykopikid @stephanlivera datacarriersize change is not a nothingburger. It opens up a huge attack surface on the network by turning every node into a CSAM/porn relay. If it was a nothingburger Core wouldn't fight tooth and nail to push it through. They clearly had some major motivation"
X Link 2025-10-07T07:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@VitalikButerin @BitMEXResearch By turning v30 nodes by default into porn relay servers Core has shot itself in the face. Good reputation takes years to build but can be squandered abruptly. We have a textbook case here"
X Link 2025-10-16T10:03Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@luke_veil @WClementeIII Bitcoin in cold storage does not require constant maintenance or updates. The only potential upgrade on the horizon is quantum-secure cryptography at some indeterminate time in the future. For gold buried in backyard better hope u keep the govt away (eminent domain)"
X Link 2025-10-16T21:19Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@sunny051488 @dailydirtnap Engagement farming"
X Link 2025-10-16T23:54Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@luke_veil @WClementeIII Tell me you don't understand Bitcoin without telling me you don't understand Bitcoin 😆"
X Link 2025-10-17T00:00Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@bholm @john_giovanni @BitcoinMonk21 A SHA256 hash of any data file no matter how large is as good as the file itself for verification purposes. 100kB chunks are easy to use for reassembling large files. This is an intentional attack on Bitcoin"
X Link 2025-10-17T00:21Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@luke_veil @WClementeIII Nice moving of the goalpost. Back to the topic: Bitcoin that last moved in [----] can move just fine today"
X Link 2025-10-17T00:23Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Checkmatey Gold is a path to Bitcoin for much of tradfi"
X Link 2025-10-16T21:30Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"Core [--] blowing up OP_RETURN limit solves the "extreme edge case" for someone who "needs to have visibility of that tx data in an unconfirmed state across the network" and can't wait for a block. That is attackers hijacking Bitcoin. It is all for benefiting one entity @citrea_xyz @lopp admits. @mattkratter @NickSzabo4 Im the guest who asked the question and I applaud Jameson @Lopp for his brutal honesty in divulging his financial interests in the problem thats solved by blowing out OP_RETURN. https://t.co/PpE049zE5k Im the guest who asked the question and I applaud Jameson @Lopp for his"
X Link 2025-10-17T22:53Z [----] followers, 29.9K engagements

"As a node operator Core v30 turns every node into a relay for 100kB chunks of arbitrary data. This is nowhere within the purpose of Bitcoin network (see Bitcoin White Paper). 83B OP_RETURN is sufficient for all purposes that use Bitcoin as a source of truth. Use it to store a hash of arbitrary data"
X Link 2025-10-19T09:42Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@BitMEXResearch @satflation @adam3us @jabulanijakes @Excellion @NickSzabo4 Core is in this mess for exactly that attitude"
X Link 2025-10-19T11:01Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@EFbullion @BitcoinPierre @patato_ass Bitcoin testing/verification is instant and it's free. It can also be done in private 100% Bitcoin also has near - zero cost for top tier secure storage"
X Link 2025-10-20T02:29Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@alangreenspaan @nic__carter Higher price pushes production rate higher for gold making its unit value self limiting. Bitcoin does not have that weakness"
X Link 2025-10-20T15:30Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@W2S_X @alangreenspaan @nic__carter Some of tradfi people will come to Bitcoin through gold. Some gold bugs will go down with the ship"
X Link 2025-10-20T17:45Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@delta_crowface @sirdlmj @alangreenspaan @nic__carter No we are not making gold in a lab from other elements at scale anytime soon"
X Link 2025-10-21T02:26Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@real_vijay Gold can't travel as fast as messages. Telegraph made it obsolete. Fiat succeeded until Bitcoin restored the parity between the speeds of commerce and transfer of value"
X Link 2025-10-22T01:07Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Checkmatey @MrEMan__ There is nothing in the white paper about arbitrary data relay and storage being part of the purpose of Bitcoin network"
X Link 2025-10-22T18:19Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@1f52b_xyz @dredgmo @Checkmatey Give me an example of what you'd consider spam. IMO anything not included in Satoshi's white paper is spam"
X Link 2025-10-22T18:22Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@adam3us @rot13maxi @NickSzabo4 @ercwl @brian_trollz @LukeDashjr Unfortunately because defaults matter Core has turned spam from nuisance into a real risk both to the network and to node operators. The more I learn about the history of how it happened the worse it looks. Core's reputation is gone. A pathetic hill to die on"
X Link 2025-10-22T18:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@stephanlivera @notgrubles Stephan as a node operator this contempt towards plebs is unwarranted. Defaulting to relaying 100kB of arbitrary data is abuse of Bitcoin network"
X Link 2025-10-22T19:31Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"Censorship of what"
X Link 2025-10-22T20:53Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @CatoTheElder17 That's where you're wrong. Bitcoin network is limited to financial tx's. It is NOT a p2p network for arbitrary data exchange. Read the white paper"
X Link 2025-10-22T21:08Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @CatoTheElder17 Exactly. Not "anything". 100kB OP_RETURN enables a lot of "anything" unfortunately. Vandalized monetary tx's do not refute the fact that non-monetary data is censored on purpose except OP_RETURN payload"
X Link 2025-10-22T21:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@notgrubles @btcblockjams It wasn't "always" about control. It became an issue of control now because Core has gone rogue by releasing v30 & vastly expanding Bitcoin's attack surface"
X Link 2025-10-23T14:46Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@barackomaba @CoinHistorian If filters don't work why is Core choosing to die on this hill for Citrea and whatever other purposes"
X Link 2025-10-23T18:43Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@csuwildcat @TheBTCBreakdown You'll shit yourself the moment you get indicted for felony transmission of [---] kB CSAM image. Easy to thump your chest on social media. Re-read the white paper to learn the scope of Bitcoin network transactions"
X Link 2025-10-24T00:47Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Sr_11ss @csuwildcat Designing for worst case scenarios is part of robust engineering. Relaying 100kB opreturns is completely outside the scope of Bitcoin network (see Satoshi's Wp). The history of how it came about is shameful and corrupt. Why should plebs tolerate this grift attack"
X Link 2025-10-24T00:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@BetruetoitUK @csuwildcat Satoshi was terrified at the arguably legitimate use of Bitcoin financial tx's for WikiLeaks donations. Now we have rogue actors hijacking the network for Citrea opening a huge legal and social attack surface. #CoreNoMore"
X Link 2025-10-24T00:54Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"On 2010-12-12 one day after commenting on Wikileaks donations via Bitcoin as a risk Satoshi disappeared from public view. https://bitcointalk.org/index.phptopic=2216.msg29280#msg29280 @csuwildcat Even Satoshi acknowledged the folly of inviting unnecessary legal risk to Bitcoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.phptopic=2216.msg29280#msg29280 @csuwildcat Even Satoshi acknowledged the folly of inviting unnecessary legal risk to Bitcoin"
X Link 2025-10-24T01:34Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@barackomaba @BitcoinErrorLog @HeSpeaksNStuff He starts with a fallacy that block space has to be filled and justifies garbage filling blocks with it. It doesn't. Block subsidy exists for a reason and there's plenty of time for block space usage to catch up. And if it never fills up we can block size when needed"
X Link 2025-10-24T05:06Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@brian_trollz "Don't talk about X because there's something else to talk about Y which I happen to believe is 1000x bigger of a problem." Persuasive"
X Link 2025-10-24T14:28Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@asanoha_gold @BitMEXResearch @LuganoPlanB @paoloardoino What surprises me is how the Core v30 malware supporters have deployed completely unrelated but otherwise good and meaningful things into their defense of blowing up Bitcoin's purpose for Citrea et al. Second example I've run into within an hour of each other today"
X Link 2025-10-24T15:10Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

""Filters don't work but I'll filter out nodes that don't run exactly the policy I want." "You'll regret this and you may regret it a lot sooner than you think." https://www.c-span.org/clip/senate-proceeding/user-clip-you-may-regret-it-a-lot-sooner-than-you-think/4739176 https://www.c-span.org/clip/senate-proceeding/user-clip-you-may-regret-it-a-lot-sooner-than-you-think/4739176 https://www.c-span.org/clip/senate-proceeding/user-clip-you-may-regret-it-a-lot-sooner-than-you-think/4739176 https://www.c-span.org/clip/senate-proceeding/user-clip-you-may-regret-it-a-lot-sooner-than-you-think/4739176"
X Link 2025-10-24T15:38Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin Because banned nodes may have tx's that others haven't seen. This becomes a problem for you once filtering nodes become a significant %age of the network (they're already 20%). 80+% nodes filter out OP_RETURNs 83B. Are you banning those too"
X Link 2025-10-24T15:55Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@aeonBTC @BitcoinWifey @GrassFedBitcoin @LuganoPlanB Nowhere in the White Paper or any other reasonable source it says that inviting state attacks is a feature. Don't make stuff up. Bitcoin is a monetary network not a distributed storage system for arbitrary data"
X Link 2025-10-24T16:48Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@aeonBTC @BitcoinWifey @GrassFedBitcoin @LuganoPlanB And you support weakening Bitcoin's ability to resist arbitrary state authority by providing a giant highly vulnerable and often used attack surface Why"
X Link 2025-10-24T16:53Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@aeonBTC @BitcoinWifey @GrassFedBitcoin @LuganoPlanB Then why is Core changing the defaults at the cost of their reputation and credibility Of course defaults matter"
X Link 2025-10-24T17:06Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @wyatt_earp I never used Knots before. Focus on what Core has done"
X Link 2025-10-24T17:57Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"Lacking any legitimate basis for turning Bitcoin into an arbitrary data relay and file storage network defenders of Core are now trying ridicule to make"fetch" happen. JUST IN: Core Dev Warns Against Uploading Grandma's Famous Apple Pie Recipe Via OP_RETURN Because It Will Give Bitcoin Type [--] Diabetes https://t.co/DNXCxyZWjQ JUST IN: Core Dev Warns Against Uploading Grandma's Famous Apple Pie Recipe Via OP_RETURN Because It Will Give Bitcoin Type [--] Diabetes https://t.co/DNXCxyZWjQ"
X Link 2025-10-24T20:22Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"Plainly false assertions even limiting the scope to US jutisdiction. See example of Elite Torrents for successful CRIMINAL prosecution. Absolutely nothing justifies turning Bitcoin into a p2p arbitrary data relay and storage network. It is meant for monetary purposes ONLY. THAT is the elephant in the room"
X Link 2025-10-24T22:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@oomahq @MajorianBTC Clean nodes need not ban dirty (Core v30 .) nodes. Propagation of every spam tx ends at every clean node"
X Link 2025-10-24T23:53Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"Dirty Nodes are those running Bitcoin Core 30.x [----] and [----] Run clean nodes"
X Link 2025-10-24T23:56Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@axexang @notgrubles These are dirty nodes: Bitcoin Core 30.x [----] 28.3"
X Link 2025-10-25T00:01Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@PakoVM @JakeBlockchain Is Bitcoin now a p2p network for relay and file storage for arbitrary data Read Satoshi's white paper (even just the title of it) before giving a bad answer. https://x.com/cguida6/status/1981958684512068008 @mattkratter 🤌 https://t.co/HbKWrTyaMz https://x.com/cguida6/status/1981958684512068008 @mattkratter 🤌 https://t.co/HbKWrTyaMz"
X Link 2025-10-25T15:39Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@fluffypony @BunkFreamon Do you now consider Bitcoin to be a p2p relay and file storage network for arbitrary types of data instead of a monetary ledger Satoshi's white paper clearly says it's a monetary network"
X Link 2025-10-25T15:43Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@PakoVM @JakeBlockchain Market for what Bitcoin is for a monetary ledger and monetary transactions only. Read the WP. Straying from that purpose is stupid"
X Link 2025-10-25T16:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@JakeBlockchain @PakoVM Agreed. OP_RETURM has worked great for years with 83B limit. No legal risk to node runners for p2p relaying. Worse than straying Core has gone rogue for Citrea and whatever else"
X Link 2025-10-25T20:21Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@B3daChange @PakoVM @JakeBlockchain This "p2p text network" notion is all in your own imagination. The Bitcoin White Paper is titled "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System". It doesn't even contain the word "text""
X Link 2025-10-25T20:27Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@stephanlivera @TomerStrolight Stephan let's put the problem solving aside for a moment and look at it from first principles. Tell me where it says in the White Paper that Bitcoin is a p2p system for arbitrary data. It explicitly specifies "peer to peer cash" as the purpose of Bitcoin. It's in the title"
X Link 2025-10-25T20:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@PakoVM @JakeBlockchain IDB does not involve tx relay. You must be thinking of serving blocks. Nothing can be done about historical blocks. You can't use them as justification for spam relay and arbitrary data storage in the Bitcoin system. You are completely unpursuasive"
X Link 2025-10-25T20:55Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@danoprey @stephanlivera @TomerStrolight Filtering is by definition a part of any purposeful network which Bitcoin is. However given your history of shitcoinery I can understand why you don't want filtering"
X Link 2025-10-25T21:00Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@exitcalmly @parman_the @14g23h34 +1 Great timely essay. Good to zoom out and look at the aerial view with clear eyes"
X Link 2025-10-25T21:46Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@TgMacro @RudyHavenstein Diversify and limit BTC per your risk tolerance. Bitcoin is a great savings tech. Risks like Fink quantum tech exist but they far from existential. Gold: Obsoleted as monetary tech by telegraph. It might work as a store of value for a bit ultimately a doomed asset"
X Link 2025-10-26T00:13Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@wyatt_earp @notgrubles You will not get a straight answer but we have the answer from Lopp (recent Breedlove interview). Grubles is just relentlessly muddying the waters trying to make fetch happen and it's not going to happen"
X Link 2025-10-26T01:29Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"What the hell has happened to these folks Every Bitcoin conference should have giant banners everywhere with the White Paper title text: "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System""
X Link 2025-10-26T06:24Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@fortalacer @rkfg_me @llorractrebor @kyletorpey @SuperTestnet Money is likely something hard for you to understand. I'll make it simpler: jpegs and random text are not money on the Bitcoin "peer-to-peer cash system""
X Link 2025-10-26T16:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@DeltaClimbs @davidmarcus @Lagarde He made a perfectly reasonable statement about kWh backing each Bitcoin at current price and cost of electricity. Stop hallucinating about what he or I are saying and just read the words in these tweets. No need to insult gratuitously"
X Link 2025-10-26T18:34Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Checkmatey @CatoTheElder17 The same arguments were made to justify the ordinal inscriptions vandalism. It was a mistake on part of Bitcoiners to let it slide"
X Link 2025-10-27T06:24Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@stephanlivera @SteveW928 I am not saying corrupt. I am saying their purposes do not fit within the purpose of Bitcoin system as outlined in the White Paper. We have to strive to stay on purpose"
X Link 2025-10-27T08:00Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@PortlandHODL @stephanlivera @Rob1Ham That sounds like someone converting Bitcoin into a file relay & storage network would say to node runners"
X Link 2025-10-27T08:04Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"Typical inverted argument from dirty node camp. Money is speech but not all speech is money. Bitcoin is for money. Not for all speech"
X Link 2025-10-27T09:37Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Checkmatey Agree the BIP [---] language should be improved. But there is an important point to remember: Money is speech but not all speech is money. Bitcoin system is for money"
X Link 2025-10-27T09:39Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Breedlove22 Bitcoin is a very specific implementation. It is not something that emerged organically. It is not "market-defined" though it is "market-approved." Adoption =/= Design"
X Link 2025-10-27T09:48Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@Checkmatey Core should roll back the damage they did in [----] [----] and [----] - it is easy to do quickly That will be a great gesture of cooperation while the community focuses on doing a proper job on the long term solution"
X Link 2025-10-27T09:58Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@melvincarvalho @SuperTestnet @adam3us Yes rolling back the default changes in v30/29.2/28.3 is a test of Core's sincerity. It is not going to happen if Core stays consistent with its recent attitude. Last chance to save its reputation and relevance for Core"
X Link 2025-10-27T17:36Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@rot13maxi @flaming_hodl "Bitcoin despite spam so far" instead of "Bitcoin after spam" "Ordinals spam made Bitcoin more valuable" is not. a smart argument"
X Link 2025-10-27T18:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Hodling_btc @matteopelleg If there was anything in there they'd have been deployed before the election. I'd like to hear a counterargument (i.e. why they weren't used)"
X Link 2025-10-27T19:31Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Hodling_btc @matteopelleg Probably why they went the Butler route"
X Link 2025-10-27T19:41Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@crypt0e @cguida6 @Money2BMrdredBy Just pause and think about how utterly stupid your comment is. I am making a genuine suggestion"
X Link 2025-10-28T15:10Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@crypt0e @cguida6 @Money2BMrdredBy Spam and arbitrary data relaying in big chunks is outside the purpose of Bitcoin. This is where you err and then make stupidly false Bcash equivalences to defend your indefensible position. Pause think and do better"
X Link 2025-10-28T15:26Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@crypt0e @cguida6 @Money2BMrdredBy Scope of neutrality is defined by the white paper. Arbitrary data and ordinals are out of scope. We need consensus update for enforcing scope instead of turning Bitcoin into an arbitrary data relay and storage network which it is now"
X Link 2025-10-28T15:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@crypt0e @cguida6 @Money2BMrdredBy You are completely wrong. If it was an "initial scope" the WP would say so. Do you realize you need to continuously make up new baseless claims to defend your erroneous position Stop"
X Link 2025-10-28T16:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@crypt0e @cguida6 @Money2BMrdredBy It'll be good to stop hallucinating what I think. Maybe just ask me"
X Link 2025-10-28T16:16Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@nakadai_mon @Arthur_van_Pelt @statusquont Miner centralization being THE short to medium term risk is a claim backed only by a tiny study ( 6k tx's) of ETH. Where are the Bitcoin miners complaining about it Where is the analysis of Bitcoin winning blocks If it's real why not update consensus"
X Link 2025-10-28T22:31Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@SGBarbour Steve jpegs and 100kB arbitrary data relay service are simply not within the scope of "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash Ssystem". Not even remotely. Exploits and vandalism do not justify betraying the clearly defined scope on which all bitcoiners agree"
X Link 2025-10-29T01:47Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@nitesh_btc @wyatt_earp What governments want in these two situations are completely different things. Regardless jpegs and relaying hundreds of kB of arbitrary data wrapped in opreturns are completely outside the purpose of a Peer to Peer Electronic Cash System"
X Link 2025-10-29T01:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@HashBalls23 @SGBarbour Wrong. BTC txs do not require jpegs. Block space is not money. It costs money like a flight ticket does. Once used it's dead. Worse than dead because it has ongoing cost of storage & bandwidth for nodes so abuse of blockspace with jpegs hurts decentralization"
X Link 2025-10-29T06:59Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@HashBalls23 @SGBarbour Hey @grok do Bitcoin full nodes store inscriptions jpeg and other arbitrary data in confirmed transactions"
X Link 2025-10-29T07:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@cutupcado That's fiat mindset. Damaged dollar bills can be retired and reissued. Doesn't work with utxo's plus we have tx validation in place so we can and do filter bad tx's out. Until a consensus update is done filters are a great solution albeit not perfect"
X Link 2025-10-29T22:25Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@LukeGromen @prideispower Aren't nukes insurance against exactly that defense offshoring/deficit"
X Link 2025-10-30T05:15Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@btcblockjams @EmmanuelDoc21M @BTCGandalf You can start by not making the problem much worse with 100kB opreturn defaults"
X Link 2025-10-30T17:34Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@btcblockjams @EmmanuelDoc21M @BTCGandalf And there'll be a lot of garment-rending when consensus update happens because "confiscation""
X Link 2025-10-30T18:21Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@btcblockjams @EmmanuelDoc21M @BTCGandalf Citrea Core etc are bad actors too. You don't have to justify abusive use of the p2p network and blockspace. Eventually the consensus update to bring the system back into scope will be needed and will happen"
X Link 2025-10-30T18:37Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@BitcoinErrorLog @rockjsquirrel Good thing Bitcoiners don't operate like you or Core do and try to achieve consensus before making changes. Authoritarian behavior is not going to work in the long run and you shouldn't recommend it"
X Link 2025-10-30T20:48Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@SuperTestnet @herogamer21btc Core is directly in violation of Bitcoin's scope as defined in the White paper. Even the title says it clearly "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System""
X Link 2025-10-30T21:03Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@herogamer21btc @SuperTestnet No code that violates the WP is an attack on the system"
X Link 2025-10-30T21:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

""Who is to decide what is or isnt a violation" Anyone with functioning reading comprehension. The White Paper is pretty easy to read. Core decisionmakers seem to have lost it for some reason"
X Link 2025-10-30T21:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@herogamer21btc @SuperTestnet Because it does not do peer-to-peer cash transfer. Citrea should use a hash of their data in OP_RETURN and host the data outside the blockchain"
X Link 2025-10-30T21:35Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@herogamer21btc @SuperTestnet Exactly. Citrea should follow Lightning's example and not force changes on the base layer. Core should refrain from corrupting the system into arbitrary data relay and storage network"
X Link 2025-10-30T21:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@OwenKemeys What part of "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" is philosophy"
X Link 2025-10-30T21:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@callebtc "Why The Bitcoin Elite Dismiss Plebs" 🔥"
X Link 2025-10-30T22:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @volpeLP @barackomaba Luke and Mechanic have nothing to do with it. Arbitrary data relaying and storage is simply out of scope for "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System""
X Link 2025-10-30T23:35Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @volpeLP @barackomaba Matter of fact I did not know Luke and Mechanic's opinion before I had my own"
X Link 2025-10-31T00:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@AaronWise5147 @w_s_bitcoin @stephanlivera In addition to the Citrea motivation the FUD about miner centralization was completely made up. There is no evidence for it and the only reference I have seen is to a tiny study on Eth blocks. Has anyone heard small miners complaining"
X Link 2025-10-31T01:03Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @AaronWise5147 @stephanlivera Then why change it in the face of so much community resistance I give people a lot of benefit of doubt but then they chip it away like this on their own"
X Link 2025-10-31T01:19Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @volpeLP @barackomaba The burden is on you to justify your hallucination about me"
X Link 2025-10-31T01:19Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @AaronWise5147 @stephanlivera You're arguing with Satoshi himself and his definition of Bitcoin scope in the White Paper. This much hubris is not good for anyone least of all yourself"
X Link 2025-10-31T01:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@volpeLP @w_s_bitcoin @barackomaba Exactly. I've known about Knots for years but installed it for the first time a month ago"
X Link 2025-10-31T01:55Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @AaronWise5147 @stephanlivera The WP & Genesis Block inscription show Satoshi knew how Bitcoin would evolve. He also wrote a lot of stuff in emails and forum posts. You have no credibility left after posting this. cc @barackomaba"
X Link 2025-10-31T02:08Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @volpeLP @barackomaba And I know I am not. Generally I grant people some default amount of goodwill (83 units to be precis) but you're free to burn it"
X Link 2025-10-31T02:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @AaronWise5147 @stephanlivera @barackomaba Stop digging"
X Link 2025-10-31T09:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@benthecarman Quite timely given how badly the technocrats and VC backed grifters have lost the plot about "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System""
X Link 2025-10-31T09:17Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@notgrubles COre has enabled BIP [---]. The current mess is 100% Core's fault. If Core hadn't violated the scope of Bitcoin (defined in the White Paper) we wouldn't be here"
X Link 2025-10-31T23:21Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@simulx4 @notgrubles No I think higher fees are better. Satoshi made excellent engineering decisions and tinkering with them is not good in general. Unfortunately too many people don't get it"
X Link 2025-11-01T05:27Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@filip_btc @gringokiwi @COLDCARDwallet Your approach is far more insecure for spending policy. @COLDCARDwallet has done it right. There is no need for what you're pushing"
X Link 2025-11-02T10:21Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@kyletorpey @NicolasDorier Core has violated the scope of Bitcoin defined by the white paper on which everyone agrees. Argue with Satoshi if you think you have a point"
X Link 2025-11-03T00:24Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@kyletorpey @NicolasDorier Another stigmatizing label. Not an actual argument. It's hubris. Start by showing where Bitcoin is supposed to be a p2p relay network for large arbitrary data files. Then try explaining why shitcoins belong on the base layer"
X Link 2025-11-03T00:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@dshephard @jam_croissant @AnastasiInTech Watched the video. I disagree with quite a few statements in the video. There's nothing particularly different about TSMC's difficulties in setting up big fabs in a new place. These are routine things that get done just fine with some time and $$. (1/2)"
X Link 2025-11-03T05:13Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@dshephard @jam_croissant @AnastasiInTech Intel's largest HVM fab complex is across town from TSMC in Chandler AZ. Intel has been making chips in Fabs 12/22/32/42 and now [--] for decades. So TSMC is not starting from scratch in an unknown environment. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/09/technology/intel-chip-factory-fab52.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/09/technology/intel-chip-factory-fab52.html"
X Link 2025-11-03T05:14Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@dshephard @jam_croissant @AnastasiInTech TSMC's Fab [--] in Arizona is capability wise not much behind its most advanced HVM fab in Taiwan and can be ramped up pretty quickly"
X Link 2025-11-03T05:20Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@coryklippsten @MrHodl Epithets like "toxic Bitcoin maxi" and "pleb slop" relieve those who use them from doing any thinking similar to the more common "bigot" "xyz-phobe" "xyz-ist". These labels turn otherwise normal people into NPCs by making them feel righteous without any effort"
X Link 2025-11-03T15:32Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@sxtvik Mamdani is a communist. That's a nonstarter"
X Link 2025-11-04T14:59Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@theonevortex @stackasaurus11 Risk minimization =/= compliance. It's smart design for the precise purpose of Bitcoin. OP_RETURN in Dirty Core v30 turn Bitcoin into a p2p file relay network for arbitrary data. Out of scope of Bitcoin & stupidly dangerous. No one buys your bullshit"
X Link 2025-11-05T18:22Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@theonevortex @stackasaurus11 "Pleb slop" is NPC-speak. Stop talking like an NPC"
X Link 2025-11-05T18:24Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@NickSzabo4 @giacomozucco The burden is not on critics of Core to explain why non financial or non timestamp data shouldn't be in the blockchain or mempools. Core & their supporters have to make the impossible case why this out of scope garbage belongs there"
X Link 2025-11-06T00:44Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@NickSzabo4 @giacomozucco People have been saying "out of band" data as if it's just a matter of node config. The correct term is "out of scope" of the Bitcoin system"
X Link 2025-11-06T00:46Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@BitcoinScoresby @NickSzabo4 @giacomozucco If someone took a dump outside your front door last month it doesn't mean your front entry becomes a public toilet. Be reasonable. Bitcoin's scope is precisely defined. Financial and timestamp txns only"
X Link 2025-11-06T02:25Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@adam3us @Arthur_van_Pelt Let's do this piecemeal. Would you please join the push to force Core to change OP_RETURN defaults back to 80B If not why not We can deal with the spam part separately"
X Link 2025-11-06T06:50Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@simulx4 @MajorianBTC No Bitcoin is not "a comms and a script protocol". It is a p2p cash system defined by the White Paper. Devs don't get to redefine it"
X Link 2025-11-06T07:15Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"With new OP_RETURN defaults the attack surface becomes massive at mempool level because it makes Bitcoin a p2p relay network for arbitrary data (what Citrea wants) no tx confirmation needed"
X Link 2025-11-06T07:27Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@phyrooo @LiliH65289916 @BitcoinScoresby @NickSzabo4 @giacomozucco The consensus is that Bitcoin is a p2p cash system. It is not for arbitrary nonfinancial data storage or relaying. "Configuration" is a trick to bypass that consensus by hiding it in dev jargon"
X Link 2025-11-06T07:29Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@giacomozucco @phyrooo @LiliH65289916 @BitcoinScoresby @NickSzabo4 Too many people are simply missing the very title of the White paper: "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Cash System". That is as explicit a consensus rule as it gets"
X Link 2025-11-06T07:41Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@jyn_urso The great thing about Bitcoin is that it incentivizes the revolution you speak of regardless of the motivations defects and time frames of individuals & entities invested in it. I'm not worried about the revolution part. Attempts to corrupt the basic design are problematic"
X Link 2025-11-06T08:07Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@andyfromthef @MichaelDunwort1 That argument would be valid if Bitcoin was a board game you play with a few friends"
X Link 2025-11-06T08:13Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @bitcoin_bugle We will just not on the timeline you choose"
X Link 2025-11-06T08:21Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @bitcoin_bugle You can't"
X Link 2025-11-06T08:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @bitcoin_bugle No I want YOU to put your money where your mouth is too"
X Link 2025-11-06T08:51Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @bitcoin_bugle And as I said not on your timeline"
X Link 2025-11-06T08:55Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@bamskki @Owll_D "The real limit is the block size" is a fabrication. The payload for OP_RETURN is meant to be a hash. https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/bitcoin-list/27/ https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/bitcoin-list/27/"
X Link 2025-11-09T08:12Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@LLFOURN @SteveW928 @aantonop Yes you're missing everything except the word "building". That seems to be a magic word that shuts down critical thinking. Shielded by this magic word devs can push any agenda even direct attacks on Bitcoin"
X Link 2025-11-09T08:19Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@LLFOURN @SteveW928 @aantonop Promoting "making Bitcoin whatever we want it to be" is the worst violation of the purpose and scope of "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System""
X Link 2025-11-09T08:34Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@bamskki @Owll_D Still not a justification for violating Bitcoin's scope with non-hash arbitrary data. Hashes are the consensus default and that needs to be moved from mistaken classification "policy" to the correct one consensus"
X Link 2025-11-09T09:01Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@resistancemoney @cryptoquick The biggest threat to Bitcoin are devs dragging it out of scope (p2p cash & timestamping) and filling mempools/storage with garbage. @giacomozucco"
X Link 2025-11-09T11:35Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@bamskki @Owll_D Storing arbitrary data is outside the scope of Bitcoin. We can't read Satoshi's mind. The only thing he ever said about storing any data other than p2p cash txns was timestamping hashes. He certainly never advocated or even condoned storing arbitrary data in the timechain"
X Link 2025-11-09T15:58Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@dathon_ohm A more apt term would be "Scope Restoration" since it is aimed at bringing Bitcoin back on track to ONLY money & timestamping. "Reduced data" sounds like it's just an efficiency improvement (which it does but it's a lot more than that). @mattkratter"
X Link 2025-11-09T16:52Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@w_s_bitcoin @ElkimXOC Sounds a lot like 100kB OP_RETURN by default"
X Link 2025-11-10T04:18Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Checkmatey @TXMCtrades Technically almost. https://www.wendys.com/frosty-flavors https://www.wendys.com/frosty-flavors"
X Link 2025-11-12T21:57Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@larslien @Travis_Kling Issues are a moving target. Pay attention to the people behind Mamdani's rise and especially the people who are giddy about it"
X Link 2025-11-13T05:34Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@parkeralewis @mattkratter @adam3us @CaminaDrummer4 @giacomozucco @lukedewolf There is no justification for the limit change so they've invented language to make 'fetch' happen by endlessly repeating that it's a 'bug'. Great way to destroy reputation"
X Link 2025-11-19T16:09Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@GrassFedBitcoin @BitcoinMotorist Wallet deletion bug is an indication that Core is getting clumsy. Alongside the poisonous v30 default config changes it's another reflection of the institutional rot that is likely irreversible now. @barackomaba"
X Link 2026-01-06T19:29Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"RT @giacomozucco: @adam3us @simulx4 @GrassFedBitcoin This one is not a false narrative but a fact super easy to prove with [--] minutes on go"
X Link 2025-11-06T07:17Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"Tweet quoted below succinctly captures the tunnel vision of some dev types causing massive damage to Bitcoin. "A comms and a script protocol" is all they see. Have these guys even looked at the foundational blueprint of Bitcoin the White Paper Its title says it all. @MajorianBTC "sanctioning" lol. so absurd. bitcoin is a comms and a script protocol it's not a political organization despite how hard you're trying to make it one @MajorianBTC "sanctioning" lol. so absurd. bitcoin is a comms and a script protocol it's not a political organization despite how hard you're trying to make it one"
X Link 2025-11-06T07:50Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"RT @waynehhsiung: It's insane the amount of love and gratitude animals show us when we rescue them from suffering and death. This is the"
X Link 2026-02-06T10:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@satflation @adam3us @jabulanijakes @Excellion @NickSzabo4 @BitMEXResearch I'll happily relay 160B OP_RETURN tx's. 100kB is a no go"
X Link 2025-10-19T10:47Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@_AlchemyBTC @udiWertheimer Yup. No matter how much he hates Cory Udi can't take away what Cory did for every Bitcoiner by busting the 2021-22 scams most notably SBF/FTX. AFAIK Cory was not a defendent in Tether's lawsuit against Swan Bitcoin"
X Link 2025-10-29T00:44Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"Unpopular opinion: Life is too short to use ball point pens"
X Link 2026-02-03T20:03Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@TheStalwart No Joe Difficulty adjustment is the most important thing to know about Bitcoin production. It is what makes Bitcoin the perfect money. Imagine if mother earth made gold mining possible only at a fixed exponentially declining rate regardless of effort & investment"
X Link 2026-02-06T21:09Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@NickSzabo4 @Capital_Mind_ @Excellion Physics and money: Transactions that cannot match the speed of information exchange necessitate trust. Gold is therefore obsolete. It still has value because of social inertia but that's fading as Bitcoin gets capitalized as a trustless monetary network"
X Link 2026-02-11T06:41Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"Good read: Complete book: https://x.com/saifedean/status/1142197167681155073s=20 https://yorickdem.medium.com/my-133-favorite-quotes-from-the-bitcoin-standard-fbe2147abebe It seems some people are pirating early drafts of my book. Please only pirate the final version It's much better and it's easily available thanks to Library Genesis: https://t.co/d0EL7muOlX https://x.com/saifedean/status/1142197167681155073s=20 https://yorickdem.medium.com/my-133-favorite-quotes-from-the-bitcoin-standard-fbe2147abebe It seems some people are pirating early drafts of my book. Please only pirate the final"
X Link 2021-03-15T01:34Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

". @RuthlessPodcast @ComfortablySmug @racheljanfaza https://t.co/vzgrKqIYRg @racheljanfaza https://t.co/vzgrKqIYRg"
X Link 2025-11-05T16:55Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"RT @AitkenAdvisors: The ongoing primary challenge for investors in this noisy too often hyperventilating world (c.f. plumbing Twitter o"
X Link 2025-11-05T20:55Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"That would work beautifully for a precise narrow and simple purpose such as the p2p cash system of Bitcoin. The fallacy in @adam3us 's English language analogy is that Bitcoin is not a general purpose data relay & storage network. @adam3us Eliminate all words longer than five characters. Limit books to [--] pages. Problem solved. @adam3us Eliminate all words longer than five characters. Limit books to [--] pages. Problem solved"
X Link 2025-11-06T08:24Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"RT @ausbtcclub: We ain't asking for much Revert back the OpReturn"
X Link 2025-11-09T08:44Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"@Conza @BitcoinMotorist @MARA @fgthiel I am a long time $MARA shareholder. @mara & @fgthiel this is not okay"
X Link 2026-02-17T00:19Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"It seems some people are pirating early drafts of my book. Please only pirate the final version It's much better and it's easily available thanks to Library Genesis: http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.phpmd5=7D394651158ABC9470CBCCE538FAAA49 http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.phpmd5=7D394651158ABC9470CBCCE538FAAA49"
X Link 2019-06-21T22:26Z 416.7K followers, [----] engagements

"Feb [--] 2026: The Mayer Multiple is [----]. The price of $BTC is [--------] $USD w/ a [---] day moving average of $101045.12 $USD. @TIPMayerMultple has historically been higher 93.62% of the time w/ an average of [----]. Learn more at http://MayerMultiple.com http://MayerMultiple.com"
X Link 2026-02-14T09:12Z 20.5K followers, [---] engagements

"RT @waynehhsiung: It's insane the amount of love and gratitude animals show us when we rescue them from suffering and death. This is the"
X Link 2026-02-06T10:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"It's insane the amount of love and gratitude animals show us when we rescue them from suffering and death. This is the relationship we could have with ALL animals. Let's make it happen This young woman buys a swimsuit to swim with her beaver friend. Every being has a degree of understanding & knows kindness. https://t.co/O68QmUcIMz This young woman buys a swimsuit to swim with her beaver friend. Every being has a degree of understanding & knows kindness. https://t.co/O68QmUcIMz"
X Link 2026-01-31T11:31Z 13.5K followers, [----] engagements

"This young woman buys a swimsuit to swim with her beaver friend. Every being has a degree of understanding & knows kindness"
X Link 2026-01-30T11:27Z 81K followers, 1.9M engagements

"Well done South Korea"
X Link 2026-01-29T17:41Z 96.8K followers, 18.9K engagements

"'Share' if you agree"
X Link 2026-01-30T12:01Z 74.4K followers, 37.7K engagements

"1. No risk in signaling. [--]. Easy to switch between clients. [--]. Risk is minimal and isolated to specific scenarios which we will be thoroughly elucidated by us and others especially if UASF looks likely. [--]. If RDTS seems likely the risk is much bigger on the other side. Are you warning people"
X Link 2026-01-29T22:45Z 25.7K followers, 26.4K engagements

"People are underestimating the impact and severity of this v30 bug. For those who are not following Bitcoin Core disclosed a new critical bug in their client today that under the right circumstances can delete all of a users wallets and backups (i.e. wallet files and anything else stored in the wallet directory). People are acting like legacy wallet migration is some obscure edge case. But v30.0 explicitly stopped loading or creating BDB legacy wallets so anyone who upgraded to v30 and still had a legacy wallet in Bitcoin Core effectively had only one path forward: migrate it. So the same"
X Link 2026-01-06T18:14Z [----] followers, 36.1K engagements

"JUST IN: #Bitcoin Lightning Network capacity makes a NEW ALL TIME HIGH 🚀"
X Link 2025-12-16T23:03Z 3.9M followers, 100K engagements

"@BitcoinMonk21 It's not just Gloria either. A few days ago I asked murchandamus on his X page "Why won't core consider a compromise" And this was his response (he deleted it immediately) but Android saves my notification history. 😂 Spam is "a made-up problem and Core couldn't care less""
X Link 2025-11-18T20:04Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"Innovator's Dilemma Digital remittance provider Remitly looks set to surpass Western Union in North America. $RELY $WU"
X Link 2025-11-08T17:00Z 83.7K followers, 11.7K engagements

"@hendry_hugh [----] Dark Fiber came from lack of demand [----] Dark GPU doesnt exist 1999: Unprofitable tech companies IPO 2025: HIGH FCF companies finance tech progress 1999: Building fiber too fast 2025: Cant build GPUs fast enough The dotcom bubble is not analogous to the AI boom"
X Link 2025-11-09T13:55Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Truly amazing and revealing interaction Paul (and all the no-coiner and altcoiner critics) studies Bitcoin but doesnt actually use it"
X Link 2025-11-09T08:59Z 261K followers, 44K engagements

"RT @ausbtcclub: We ain't asking for much Revert back the OpReturn"
X Link 2025-11-09T08:44Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

"We ain't asking for much Revert back the OpReturn @eumartinez20 @stephanlivera Core could also end it overnight simply by releasing a v30.1 with the datacarriersize set back to [--]. @eumartinez20 @stephanlivera Core could also end it overnight simply by releasing a v30.1 with the datacarriersize set back to 83"
X Link 2025-11-09T08:28Z [----] followers, [---] engagements

"@eumartinez20 @stephanlivera Core could also end it overnight simply by releasing a v30.1 with the datacarriersize set back to 83"
X Link 2025-11-08T21:56Z 103.4K followers, 26.8K engagements

"@adam3us Eliminate all words longer than five characters. Limit books to [--] pages. Problem solved"
X Link 2025-11-06T00:06Z 27.4K followers, [----] engagements

"According to Core: Junk data on Bitcoin is ok. Junk data on Cashu - not ok. Do you get it now"
X Link 2025-11-05T17:59Z [----] followers, [----] engagements

"@MajorianBTC "sanctioning" lol. so absurd. bitcoin is a comms and a script protocol it's not a political organization despite how hard you're trying to make it one"
X Link 2025-11-06T04:02Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing