[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@ben_wright_ "A few quick comments as the maker of the 2022 @_SBTC motion that passed overwhelmingly: X. Many acknowledge our egalitarian-ish problem but criticize every attempt to address it as "imperfect." While I haven't yet seen a perfect solution I do eagerly await their proposals"
X Link @ben_wright_ 2025-10-29T16:11Z XXX followers, 2889 engagements

"2. Over the past X years I've grown convinced that language does not exist that will stop those who want to accommodate egalitarians from doing soespecially when the accommodators wield substantial influence as they do in the @_SBTC "
X Link @ben_wright_ 2025-10-29T16:11Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"3. SBTC's Credentials Committee certainly DID NOT have its hands tied by interpretive language adopted in 2022. That language aligns with our Constitution & our Executive Board's interpretation adopted years ago. Any problem with our language originated there not in 2022"
X Link @ben_wright_ 2025-10-29T16:11Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"I offer that context in screenshots of an email I sent to our SBTC EB last night"
X Link @ben_wright_ 2025-10-29T16:11Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Missed something important in my 1st pass of @bartbarber's article. @marcminter caught it. As Bart said he understands @_SBTC governing docs. He knows we're explicitly confessional unlike SBC. Implication: His own article exposes our CC's failure to address obvious concerns"
X Link @ben_wright_ 2025-10-30T15:25Z XXX followers, XXX engagements