[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@Ed_dddie "Your point last Christmas/New Year"
X Link @Ed_dddie 2025-11-03T13:37Z XXX followers, 3.9M engagements

"@willnewcs94 Teams fighting for trophies should. Ekitike has hit the ground running when he was signed I doubt they expected this level this soon. Hes often sat on shows with ex utd players saying how Liverpool couldn't compete with utd having Rooney tevez and berbatov. That worked"
X Link @Ed_dddie 2025-11-03T15:55Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@willnewcs94 Isak was the proven player the one they chased first and the one he claimed he'd pay 150m for. Since he's signed hes done nothing but try to slate isak. Same way he did szoboszlai last year now they signed wirtz and hes on his back too. He's a walking contradiction"
X Link @Ed_dddie 2025-11-03T15:57Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@mk_mk_001 @PainlnDiaz Yeah im not a teenager I dont care about likes if anything it brings weapons to page. January would pay 150m for him one of best strikers in the world. Fast forward to the summer and now hes saying he wouldn't have signed him. Hes a hypocrite makes total sense"
X Link @Ed_dddie 2025-11-03T17:26Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@Elnenyesta The first line was Liverpool of old would sign ekitike not isak. Goes on to try explain profiles the overall point is isak isnt a Liverpool player. Yet only at the turn of the year hes saying he'd pay 150m for him. Its contradictory"
X Link @Ed_dddie 2025-11-03T14:51Z XXX followers, 3806 engagements

"@sieteqr @willnewcs94 And it's was obviously before the jota tragedy. The situation changed. "That was my point all summer" suggests that he even after ekitike and the jota tragedy he didnt want Liverpool to sign both. But XX months ago he'd have spent 150m on Isak"
X Link @Ed_dddie 2025-11-03T15:51Z XXX followers, 2449 engagements

"@Wanalyst007 Thats not the point being made. He claimed he'd pay 150m for isak because hes that good -to- Liverpool shouldn't have signed him because ekitike can develop and hes half the price. Its fairly simple to see 🙌"
X Link @Ed_dddie 2025-11-03T17:07Z XXX followers, 41.2K engagements

"@AFCMediaXI @AhhBEE____ @CHIESEVSKI @Elnenyesta Not sure why you care The post hes agreeing to isnt sign either or its sign ekitike and not isak. XX games a year rotation/injuries/international games have X is no problem at all but again hes agreeing with something else"
X Link @Ed_dddie 2025-11-03T17:29Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@Stef_Housen Yeah. Liverpool lost X strikers and signed X X of which is the man carra claimed he'd pay 150m for Liverpool paid less and now hes not happy. Funny alright"
X Link @Ed_dddie 2025-11-03T18:05Z XXX followers, XX engagements