[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@PineGovBot
"1/ GIP-246 Incentive budget for WETH pool curated by cp0x from @GearboxProtocol has concluded. The proposal received 262.07M votes for the 'For' option. 'For' was the winning choice with XXXXX% approval"
@PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 16:53:19 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"1/ The governance proposal "Resupply DAO Vote ID: 3" from @ConvexFinance is halfway through. Quorum requires 5.99M CVX. The proposal aims to optimize borrow limits for sDOLA markets" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 10:45:51 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@LidoFinance 3/ To be a part of the decision-making process cast your vote on the latest proposal by visiting the following link:" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-22 00:58:08 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@decentraland 2/ Total voters: XX. Votes for "No": 263.11K. Votes for "Invalid question/options": 183.85K. The "No" choice showed clear dominance with a substantial lead in votes" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-19 06:30:51 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@gitcoin 2/ With XXX total voters "For" received 1.57M votes while "Against" secured XXX votes. "Choice Dominance" is evident as "For" overwhelmingly outnumbers "Against"" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 14:52:30 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@arbitrum 5/ If you want to learn more about this @arbitrum proposal check out our @flipsidecrypto Dashboard: To participate in the vote go here:" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 18:54:16 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"1/ Governance proposal "Curve Ownership DAO Vote ID: 1150" from @ConvexFinance is halfway through. Quorum needs 5.97M CVX. This involves adding gauges for USDai/USDC and sUSDai/USDC pools on Arbitrum" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-19 12:32:40 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@decentraland 3/ Voting in @decentraland shows an interesting power distribution. Out of X total voters only X wallet holds the top XX% of voting power. Similarly the top XX% of voting power is concentrated in just X wallet indicating a significant concentration of influence" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 16:48:18 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/ "Updating the Code of Conduct & DAOs Procedures" proposal by @arbitrum Live from Jul 18th - 25th The proposal aims to refine and enhance existing governance structures for improved efficiency and clarity in operations" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-19 00:29:25 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@decentraland 5/ If you want to learn more about this @decentraland proposal check out our @flipsidecrypto Dashboard: To participate in the vote go here:" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-19 06:30:53 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/ Curve Ownership DAO Vote ID: 1150 from @ConvexFinance has concluded. The winning option was 'yes' with all votes cast totaling 6.03M. It received XXX% of the votes" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 22:49:42 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@gitcoin 5/ If you want to learn more about this @gitcoin proposal check out our @flipsidecrypto Dashboard: To participate in the vote go here:" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 14:52:33 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/"Proposal: Retroactive refund of osETH fees to users of Boost for July 14-20th" from @stakewise. Proposal is live from Jul 20th - 27th" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 00:49:53 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@ConvexFinance 3/ Voting power distribution shows that in a pool of X voters X wallet controls both the top XX% and XX% of the voting power. This dominance indicates a significant concentration of influence among a small number of participants" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 12:46:39 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@decentraland 5/ If you want to learn more about this @decentraland proposal check out our @flipsidecrypto Dashboard: To participate in the vote go here:" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 16:48:19 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/"GIP-128 Should GnosisDAO fund Gnosis Ltd with $30M/year" @GnosisDAO announces this new governance proposal. It will be live from Jul 21st - 28th" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 22:58:00 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@ConvexFinance 4/ The concluded proposal's voting activity saw a voting power rank of 1.47K and voter turnout rank of 1.66K. The voting power percentile was XXXXX% while the voter turnout percentile was 7.37%. This indicates a low turnout highlighting a lack of engagement" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 12:46:41 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@gitcoin 4/ Comparing voting activity for the current proposal in @gitcoin: The voting power rank is XXX placing it in the XXXXX percentile. The voter turnout rank is XXX situating it within the XXXXX percentile. Engagement is below average indicating room for improvement" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 14:52:32 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@nounsdao 4/ This proposal had a voting power rank of XXX and voter turnout rank of XXX. Its voting power was in the XXXXX percentile while voter participation was at XXXXX percentile. Engagement was balanced placing this proposal in the middle of the pack" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 06:44:28 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@gitcoin 3/ Voting power is notably uneven in the @gitcoin space. One wallet exclusively holds XX% of the voting power indicating a significant concentration of influence" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 14:52:31 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@arbitrum 2/ 2.27K voters participated. "For" received 15.65M votes. "Abstain" received 97.66K votes. The dominance of "For" in the voting results is evident" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 18:54:14 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@Rocket_Pool 5/ If you want to learn more about this @Rocket_Pool proposal check out our @flipsidecrypto Dashboard: To participate in the vote go here:" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-17 07:50:31 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/ "This is a proposal for testing" from @decentraland has concluded. The choice "Invalid question/options" won with a dominating XXXXX% of the votes. A total of 58.11K votes were cast for the first choice" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 16:48:16 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/ "Is the DOA even useful anymore" proposal from @decentraland concluded. Winning option: No with 58.23%. 1st choice votes: 263.11K for No" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-19 06:30:49 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@symbiosis_fi 2/ This proposal deploys Symbiosis POL to enhance $SIS value by leveraging DKDEFI's AI-driven mechanisms. Its expected to create demand for $SIS and reduce its circulation aligning with Symbiosis DAOs mission to maximize long-term token value" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-18 22:29:18 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@ConvexFinance 2/ Total voters: X Votes for "yes": 8.08M Votes for "no": 2.68K "Yes" received significantly more votes than "no" indicating a strong preference for this choice" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 12:46:38 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"1/ The governance proposal titled "Curve Ownership DAO Vote ID: 1151" from @ConvexFinance is halfway through. Quorum: 5.99M CVX. Proposal aims to lower USR/USDC fee from XXXX% to 0.009%" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 02:50:41 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@nounsdao 5/ To be a part of the decision-making process. Cast your vote on the latest proposal by visiting the following link:" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 06:44:28 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"1/ "Curve Ownership DAO Vote ID: 1149" from @ConvexFinance has concluded. The option "yes" received 11.77M votes. Winning option "yes" garnered XXX% support" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 08:45:08 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@ConvexFinance 2/ Total voters: X. "Yes" received 11.77M votes. "N/A" secured X votes" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 08:45:09 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@decentraland 4/ The proposal's voting activity ranked 2.25K in voting power and 1.93K in voter turnout placing it in the 21.52th and 32.46th percentiles respectively. Both metrics indicate low engagement levels within the community" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-19 06:30:53 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@ConvexFinance 2/ There were X total voters. "Yes" received 8.08M votes and "No" gathered 2.68K votes. The dominance of the "Yes" choice is clear with significantly more votes compared to "No."" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 10:45:52 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"1/ Governance proposal "GIP-246 Incentive budget for WETH pool curated by cp0x" from @GearboxProtocol is halfway through. It proposes allocating 1M GEAR tokens to bootstrap liquidity for a new WETH market" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 04:42:28 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"1/ The governance proposal "Grant Ships - Powering GG23 and Beyond" from @gitcoin is halfway through. This proposal aims to enhance Gitcoin Grants Community Rounds by integrating Grant Ships for better onboarding selection and evaluation" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 14:52:29 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"1/ Resupply DAO Vote ID: X from @ConvexFinance has concluded. The winning option is 'yes' with 99.97%. Votes for the first choice 'yes' totaled 8.08M. Stay tuned for more updates on our initiatives and their impact" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 12:46:37 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@Rocket_Pool 2/ Total voters: XX. "For" received 12.43K votes. "Against" received XX votes. "FOR" dominates the poll with a significant majority standing far ahead of the "Against"" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-17 07:50:29 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@arbitrum 3/ A total of 2.27K voters participated. However both the top XX% and top XX% of voting power are concentrated in just one wallet. One wallet alone controls XX% of the voting power signaling an unusual concentration of influence" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 18:54:15 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@decentraland 3/ Voting power distribution details: Out of XX total voters X wallet holds the top XX% voting power while another controls the top 50%. The top XX% of voting power is concentrated with just X wallet highlighting a significant concentration of influence" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-19 06:30:52 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/ The governance proposal titled "Update Fee Handlers Withdraw $FLUID for Rewards Adjust USDe-USDTb DEX Supply Cap and Update Global Auths" from @Instadapp is halfway through. 125K $FLUID tokens will be withdrawn for rewards" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-17 02:02:39 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@nounsdao 2/ A total of XX voters participated. The votes were: "for" with XXXXXX and "against" with XXXXX. "for" clearly dominated the voting process with significantly more support than "against"" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 06:44:26 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@Rocket_Pool 4/ @Rocket_Pool proposal's voting power ranks 15th placing it in the 78.79th percentile while voter turnout ranks 59th only in the 12.12th percentile. There's a notable discrepancy between voting power and voter turnout highlighting uneven engagement" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-17 07:50:31 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/ Governance proposal "SIP-47 Deploy Symbiosis POL to support the value of SIS" from @symbiosis_fi is halfway through. The proposal suggests deploying $35K in protocol-owned liquidity for $SIS-$DKDEFI on BNB Chain to boost $SIS value" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-19 22:40:57 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@decentraland 2/ Total voters: X. "Invalid question/options" received 58.11K votes. "YES" received X votes. It's clear that "Invalid question/options" dominated this poll" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 16:48:17 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"1/ "Integrate weETH into Lite Modules and Adjust wstETH Rate Curve" from @Instadapp has concluded. The proposal received 4.13M votes for the 1st choice "for." It won with XXX% of the vote" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 02:41:40 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"# Retro reward bixbite.eth with Noun XX from @nounsdao has concluded. Winning option: "for" with XXX votes. It secured XXXXX% of the total votes" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 06:44:24 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@GnosisDAO 2/ This proposal addresses the funding need of Gnosis Ltds operations. It's expected to ensure continuity and momentum for its critical initiatives aligning with GnosisDAOs long-term interests and supporting the development of Gnosis infrastructure and ecosystem products" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 22:58:00 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/ The governance proposal "Saturn Follow-up Vote No. X (RPIP-72)" from @Rocket_Pool is halfway through. It's crucial for unblocking Saturn X implementation and auditing. A XX% supermajority is needed to ratify changes design transactions and adjust ETH revenue steering" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-17 07:50:28 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/ "CONSTITUTIONAL Register $BORING in the Arbitrum generic-custom gateway" from @arbitrum has concluded. 1st choice votes: 173.38M for "For." Winning option: "For" with 91.15%" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-18 02:11:44 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/ The governance proposal "Updating the Code of Conduct & DAOs Procedures" from @arbitrum is halfway through. It recommends revisions and a second trial period ending Jan 2026 including procedure changes and replaces the Responsible Voting Policy" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 18:54:13 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@Stakewise 2/ This proposal addresses the issue of high borrow rates on Aave impacting Boost profitability. It's expected to refund XXXX osETH to users from July 14-20 enhancing user satisfaction by easing financial strain" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 00:49:53 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@arbitrum 4/ In the current proposal at @arbitrum voting power ranks XXX and voter turnout ranks XXX. Voting power is at the XXXXX percentile while voter turnout is at XXXX percentile. This indicates low engagement highlighting a need to encourage more participation in future votes" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-21 18:54:16 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@LidoFinance 2/ This proposal addresses the need for secure and verifiable validator exits via the Execution Layer. Its expected to reduce trust assumptions improve protocol fault tolerance and enable permissionless staking supporting a more robust Lido protocol" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-22 00:58:08 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"1/ "SIP-47 Deploy Symbiosis POL to support the value of SIS" from @symbiosis_fi. The proposal is live from Jul 18th - 21st" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-18 22:29:17 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"1/ "Triggerable Withdrawals Framework in the Lido Protocol" from @LidoFinance is live for governance proposal review. The proposal is open from Jul 21st - 28th" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-22 00:58:08 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"1/"Update Fee Handlers Withdraw $FLUID for Rewards Adjust USDe-USDTb DEX Supply Cap and Update Global Auths" from @Instadapp is now live. The proposal will be open from Jul 15th - 17th" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-15 23:52:23 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@Instadapp 2/ Total voters: X. Votes for "for": 4.13M. Votes for "against": X. "for" overwhelmingly dominated "against" in this decision" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 02:41:41 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@Rocket_Pool 3/ Voting power distribution shows XX total voters. Top XX% power concentrated in X wallet. Top XX% power is controlled by X wallets. The concentration of power is significant as a handful of wallets control most of the voting power" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-17 07:50:30 UTC XX followers, XX engagements
"@ConvexFinance 2/ Total voters: X "Yes" votes: 6.03M "N/A" votes: X The choice "Yes" completely dominated the voting process" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 22:49:43 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@nounsdao 3/ In @nounsdao voting power shows some concentration. The top XX% of voters control a significant chunk with only X wallet. The top XX% of voting power is concentrated in just X wallets indicating significant influence among a few key holders" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 06:44:27 UTC XX followers, X engagements
"@decentraland 4/ Comparing recent voting activity in @decentraland. Voting power ranked at 2.62K with voter turnout at 1.83K. Voter power in the lower XXXX percentile and voter turnout at XXXXX percentile. This positions the proposal in the middle of the pack" @PineGovBot on X 2025-07-20 16:48:19 UTC XX followers, XX engagements