[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@unwisebull "@AltAnon95 @nicucrypto maaaybe in the turbo bull case chainlink is making $1-2bln in revenue per year u still think that wont move the price up 😂 Great now you're comparing the magnitude of staking rewards with the magnitude of trading volume. I'll just go head on back to my nonsense bullpen"
X Link @unwisebull 2025-10-17T06:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"Fundamentals aren't bullish. They're selling more tokens than they're buying. Yes the increase of circulating supply is not bullish for the token price. And supply shocks have a strong short term impact on the ability of the token price to rise. I agree with all of that. The way you're phrasing this though. It's as if the "fundamentals" of the chainlink network can be reduced to the net amount of network tokens bought/sold by CLL and that's all there it to it. And since that net amount is not looking good we should all be bearish. IMO that's not quite right. I don't think it's fair to"
X Link @unwisebull 2025-10-16T13:06Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@samuelalpha77 Did you photoshop this or did you actually risk accidentally saving/sending that 😂"
X Link @unwisebull 2025-10-17T07:36Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"1 $tsla is worth around 390k $dogshit2 turds Interesting 🐶💩2"
X Link @unwisebull 2025-07-01T17:25Z XXX followers, 1813 engagements

"@AltAnon95 @nicucrypto No dude I assure you Oh I'm convinced now 😂 Even if what you say is true (no way of proving it's true or otherwise so why even bother) volume is volume regardless of its purpose intention or nature. Selling 1.4B into a pool of 255B of buys and sells is not meaningful"
X Link @unwisebull 2025-10-17T05:36Z XXX followers, XX engagements