@yutazzz Avatar @yutazzz YUTA-Cardano/CPA(DMは全て詐欺)

YUTA-Cardano/CPA(DMは全て詐欺) posts on X about drep, ada, cardano, blockchain the most. They currently have [------] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [-----] engagements in the last [--] hours.

Engagements: [-----] #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: [--] #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: [------] #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: [-------] #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence finance 20.95% cryptocurrencies 17.14% countries 3.81% stocks 1.9% technology brands 1.9% exchanges 0.95% currencies 0.95%

Social topic influence drep #13, ada 23.81%, cardano #405, blockchain #1361, if you 8.57%, in the 8.57%, level 6.67%, reduce #1226, this is 3.81%, type #27

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @inputendorsers @silversoul8668 @adalink_io @phillewisit @thomasnordicada @cerkoryn @bigpey @cardaniansio @armyofspies @nimuepool @hix_coffeepool @cswap_destroy @frankieboy180 @blockdaemonhq @nedscave @shaggyrax @mathiascardano @elderm @hephypool @blinklabs_io

Top assets mentioned Cardano (ADA) Midnight (NIGHT) Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL) XRP (XRP) Basic Attention (BAT) Bitcoin (BTC) BNB (BNB) Ava AI (AVA) Ethereum (ETH) Solana (SOL)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"10.5.4💪💪 ⚠ ATADA has upgraded all nodes to v10.5.4. ⚠ SPOs please all upgrade to this version ASAP. Dont stay on 10.1.4 or any other 10.5.x version than 10.5.4. Thanks ⚠ ATADA has upgraded all nodes to v10.5.4. ⚠ SPOs please all upgrade to this version ASAP. Dont stay on 10.1.4 or any other 10.5.x version than 10.5.4. Thanks"
X Link 2026-02-10T23:01Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Target-Centered DRep Reward Model A pseudo-"delegation saturation" system for DRep using rewards: This is just a random idea not a model based on deep thought. What do you think What I like about this model is that it only has two parameters. Let's keep things simple. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M8JAuAntJOa7Z6j3GfC2hWFl4kbZLkzEel_cN4-kymw/editusp=sharing Has anyone written a CIP for the DRep_delegation_saturation related parameters (which are like the DRep equivalent of the pool_ k(N) parameter)"
X Link 2026-02-13T08:00Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"I've listed pools that appear to have not voted for Increase Transaction and Block Memory Units (Part [--] of 2) have owner addresses that are not set to Abstain and have delegated more than 60M ada 🙏 (Sorry if I'm wrong) Please consider voting as an SPO. 🙏🙏🙏 UPBIT 516.63M @Official_Upbit BD 428.32M @BlockdaemonHQ NORTH 344.82M @NordicPool NuFi 314.24M @nufiwallet FOO 304.53M FIGMENT 199.58M @Ledger EDEN 171.03M @EdenGardenPool CRDNS 170.64M @Cardanians_io MS 160.91M @moonstake BLANK 152.20M BLOOM 148.89M @cardanobloom SBP 140.04M NEDS 117.73M @nedscave TREZOR 103.30M @Trezor PILOT 92.95M"
X Link 2026-02-10T05:19Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"I will vote YES on Reduce minimum Constitutional Committee size (committeeMinSize) from [--] to [--]. Current Risk At present the actual number of Constitutional Committee (CC) members is equal to the minimum required size. In this situation if even one CC member resigns the committee would fall below the minimum threshold and become non-functional. This would prevent not only ordinary governance actions but also critical actions such as urgent security updates. This represents a serious structural risk that must be addressed urgently. Available Options In principle there are only two ways to"
X Link 2026-02-10T06:18Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Reduce minimum Constitutional Committee size (committeeMinSize) from [--] to [--] YES CCCCCC1CCCC [--] (1) CC (2) CC (2) CC [--]. CC CCCC7657CC7CC [--]. CC CC78DRepCC [--]. CCTENET [--] CCTENET [--] CCCC1CC5CCDRepDRep5CC8 CC1CCCCReduce minimum Constitutional Committee size (committeeMinSize) from [--] to [--] YES"
X Link 2026-02-10T06:18Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"👀 💢 https://t.co/7vNWK1LlCA 💢 https://t.co/7vNWK1LlCA"
X Link 2026-02-10T07:56Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"🙏 Hix [--] [--] CCCCCC [--] [---] CC [--] Step1Step23 [--] CC CC [--] CC CC https://x.com/yutazzz/status/2021106533145379300s=46&t=HLXFUfwiC5X1UJRSKOCW2w CC5 3☕ Step [------] Step https://t.co/WeBHAQLnQC https://x.com/yutazzz/status/2021106533145379300s=46&t=HLXFUfwiC5X1UJRSKOCW2w CC5 3☕ Step [------] Step https://t.co/WeBHAQLnQC"
X Link 2026-02-10T08:30Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"ADA ADA ADA"
X Link 2026-02-10T08:53Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"CCCCCCCCCC CCCCCC [--] YutaCC [--] YutaCC"
X Link 2026-02-10T09:18Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Sorry this governance action may be invalidated (if another parameter governance action is approved). 🙏 https://x.com/hornan7/status/2021158956928848374s=46&t=HLXFUfwiC5X1UJRSKOCW2w 🚨 NEW GOVERNANCE ACTION ALERT 🚨 🏷 Type: Parameter Change 🔗 Details: https://t.co/iNBwf2KaFE #Cardano #Blockchain #Governance https://x.com/hornan7/status/2021158956928848374s=46&t=HLXFUfwiC5X1UJRSKOCW2w 🚨 NEW GOVERNANCE ACTION ALERT 🚨 🏷 Type: Parameter Change 🔗 Details: https://t.co/iNBwf2KaFE #Cardano #Blockchain #Governance"
X Link 2026-02-10T10:18Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"The essence of this governance action is probably whether you want to increase the actual number of CCs beyond [--]. If you don't lower the minimum number of CCs you'll need to increase the actual number of CCs beyond [--]. Increasing the actual number of CCs requires elections and voting. Consensus is needed on holding elections but there's also need for consensus on how much to increase the number. And if you believe that CCs shouldn't be unpaid work then after actually increasing the CCs you'll also need to discuss CC compensation that DRep can agree on under the current market conditions"
X Link 2026-02-10T14:48Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"sorry There are [--] parameters not 2"
X Link 2026-02-13T08:04Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"Target-Centered DRep Reward Model v2.0 - A pseudo-"delegation saturation" system for DRep using rewards I have made the following adjustments based on your feedback and look forward to your feedback. DRep receives its computed reward only if: it voted on all governance actions whose voting period ended during the cycle it submitted a rationale for each vote and the computed amount is at least [---] ADA. Otherwise the payout is zero without renormalization. The example calculation has been significantly simplified. If the calculation range is expanded to include all governance actions from June"
X Link 2026-02-16T01:36Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"1049 #Cardano MIDNIGHT $NIGHT Claim your $NIGHT airdrop for Cardano's largest MIDNIGHT by October 4th https://forum.cardano.org/t/10-4-9-cardano-midnight/148007 https://forum.cardano.org/t/10-4-9-cardano-midnight/148007"
X Link 2025-08-05T11:25Z 10.6K followers, 14K engagements

"In Fund13 the Cardano Foundation had a decisive and massive voting power of [---] million ADA. The good news is that in Fund14 with just [----] ADA you can achieve an equivalent level of voting power 👀 The cube root of [---] million ADA is [---]. Since the minimum participation amount in Fund14 is [--] ADA you can prepare [---] wallets with a [--] ADA balance each. 25(1/3) * [---] = [---] which equals the voting power of a single wallet holding [---] million ADA"
X Link 2025-10-02T04:11Z 10.6K followers, 11.5K engagements

"New NIGHT Tokenomics (Unit: billion-NIGHT) 🎉🎉 Glacier Drop : 3.548b Scavenger Mine:1b Lost-and-Found pool:0.25b Midnight Foundation:8.4b Reserve:7.2b TGE:2.4b Treasury:1.2b 1/ Two big updates are coming to Scavenger Mine. [--] The total NIGHT allocation for the Scavenger Mine phase is increasing to 1B NIGHT. [--] The final day will be browser-only to better increase the opportunity for all participants. Details below 👇🧵 https://t.co/sDTCjpuZym 1/ Two big updates are coming to Scavenger Mine. [--] The total NIGHT allocation for the Scavenger Mine phase is increasing to 1B NIGHT. [--] The final day"
X Link 2025-11-06T02:58Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Thank you to all the DRep and CCs who voted for CARDANO BLOCKCHAIN ECOSYSTEM CONSTITUTION v2.4 not only Yes but also No and Abstain https://adastat.net/governances/91a79f5c934b7c91e3027736d565080c2b6611fb8484b1156fdf16121fcfb41000 https://adastat.net/governances/91a79f5c934b7c91e3027736d565080c2b6611fb8484b1156fdf16121fcfb41000"
X Link 2026-01-20T00:15Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"DRep Total Delegation Trend: December [----] January 2026: +175M 💪 EMURGO +47M Blockdaemon +12M Community delegation from CF +220M CF -52M Japan DRep -35M Other total declines -18M Today we reached the first milestone in the Cardano Foundation's governance roadmap. We've just delegated an additional [---] million ada to [--] selected DReps. All of them focus on either Adoption or Operations. Read the full announcement: https://t.co/1W2m4PD1LD Today we reached the first milestone in the Cardano Foundation's governance roadmap. We've just delegated an additional [---] million ada to [--] selected DReps."
X Link 2026-01-21T03:19Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Great article What I really want is a one-click download of all original proposal data attachments and current progress milestone details for Catalyst Treasury Withdraw and CBDAO in CSV format. Whether it's Catalyst CBDAO or Treasury Withdraw neither DRep CC other community members nor ada holders have the bandwidth to go to the Catalyst Milestones module and review over [----] proposals or to search for open and read the 50+ page progress reports shared by each company's X account. For personal reasons I regularly check the Catalyst milestones module for Japan-related proposals and manually"
X Link 2026-01-26T02:04Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"If you really believe that Budget Info Action will bring about financial discipline check the on-chain history to see what happened in [----]. Budget Info Action may at first glance appear to be a time-wasting financial discipline system that delays payments by one month but in reality it is a technique that lowers the treasury withdrawal threshold by 17% which normally requires 67% approval. @shaggyrax Please remember what happened in Budget Process [----]. The budget info action (requiring 51%) lowered the approval threshold for treasury withdrawal (requiring 67%) by 17% making it dramatically"
X Link 2026-01-27T11:40Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"I understand what you're trying to say but my question is. what kind of wording do you think is necessary in the Constitution to specifically achieve what you intend My understanding is that you're always talking about the flaws in the old Constitution (and the new one). Regarding the way Budget info action is implemented which you say is problematic most of the seven CCs have voted in favor of constitutionality so far. In other words what you think is problematic was not deemed problematic under the old Constitution. So ultimately we'll come to the conclusion that the wording of the"
X Link 2026-02-03T07:02Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"tips [--]. DRepDRep [--]. 10ADA1 [--]. v2.5v3.0intersectdiscord [--]. v2.4 https://x.com/yutazzz/status/2013793338114126326s=46&t=HLXFUfwiC5X1UJRSKOCW2w https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018685620328304713 https://x.com/yutazzz/status/2013793338114126326s=46&t=HLXFUfwiC5X1UJRSKOCW2w https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018685620328304713"
X Link 2026-02-03T13:58Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Thank you Phil 🙏 Let's agree to disagree on this one too 🙏 Suppose A causes bad event C under rule B. What should be done to prevent bad event C from happening again - In my opinion this should always be an immediate improvement to rule B reducing the likelihood of event C happening because A is out of control. You call this "immaturity." I call this governance. - But certainly we can hope that A will grow over time and reduce the likelihood of bad event C happening under rule B. I agree with calling this "maturity." However I don't think it's governance. This may be a disease of people"
X Link 2026-02-03T16:05Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"@phillewisit @InputEndorsers @QuasarSure @ArmyofSpies @IntersectMBO Thank you Phil🙏🙏"
X Link 2026-02-04T06:02Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"ADA is approaching its January [----] price level ($0.239). January [----] corresponds to the period between the start of Shelley centralized mode ($0.1) around July [----] and the completion of full decentralization ($1.0) in March [----] 👀"
X Link 2026-02-06T00:17Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"If the Net Change Limit of [---] Million ADA for Epochs [------] info action was submitted next week would you vote YES"
X Link 2026-02-06T07:59Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"@InputEndorsers Thank you 🙏🙏🙏"
X Link 2026-02-06T16:00Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"@InputEndorsers Thank you 🙏 Last year there was an attempt to lower the 350M ADA NCL to 200M ADA but I believe it failed. Learning from this experience perhaps it would be more practical to do this gradually rather than lowering it all at once. 🙏 https://adastat.net/governances/7d9fc9fe4cee64fb34e57783378ac869a85c78d6fbcd4078ed131ab6fa3c7db600 https://adastat.net/governances/7d9fc9fe4cee64fb34e57783378ac869a85c78d6fbcd4078ed131ab6fa3c7db600"
X Link 2026-02-06T16:04Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"So are you saying that wanting a lower NCL is stupid Can you explain why you want to maintain the 350M ADA NCL Please give me a logical answer. I'm starting to lose faith in you because you've been lying about "Yuta participated in the ICO" and "the top [--] DRep voted NO to the 200M ADA NCL." Please can you stop attacking me with false information Can you please give me a logical argument I sincerely ask this. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019947029863268507 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019947029863268507"
X Link 2026-02-07T01:31Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Thank you gintama 🙏 I understand your point but I also think there's a chicken-and-egg aspect to it. Ultimately I think we won't have the "detailed information to determine an appropriate NCL amount" until the Budget [----] process is somewhat underway. It's true that DRep doesn't fully understand the numbers behind the NCL but perhaps neither Charles Intersect you or I know for sure. And I'm not here to judge whether 200M ADA or 250M ADA is correct. It's up to DRep as a whole to decide not me alone; I'm looking for a level that the entire DRep can agree on. In other words I'm not looking for"
X Link 2026-02-07T03:20Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"thank you Jon To demonstrate this logic we first need to be able to explain the causal relationship between investing in the ecosystem and seeing results. 🙏 - If we can effectively explain our past investments in the ecosystem and their results we can explain why we need to continue doing this. - If we can't explain it we can simply say "Until now there have been no useful results from our investments but in the future there will be because we're changing our approach from YYY to XXX.""
X Link 2026-02-08T09:33Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"In Japan the ruling party has won a decisive victory. What comes next A proposal for Japans first-ever constitutional amendment particularly on military matters Expansionary fiscal policy"
X Link 2026-02-08T22:12Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"I think this is a bit constitutionally ambiguous but a careful reading of the Constitution suggests that the NCL may not require a CC vote. 🙏 I don't know why the ECC didn't vote this time but under the previous Constitution the ECC abstained from all NCLs and the rationale for that vote indicates this. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Eastern-Cardano-Council/ga-rationales-2025/refs/heads/main/ga76/ga76-rationale.jsonld https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Eastern-Cardano-Council/ga-rationales-2025/refs/heads/main/ga76/ga76-rationale.jsonld"
X Link 2026-02-08T23:46Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"@MathiasCardano Sadly yes it's possible that some investment assets may be rising at least in Japanese yen terms"
X Link 2026-02-08T23:49Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Thank you Jon I understand what you're saying and there's no doubt we should respect the builders but what I want to clarify here is what exactly you mean by a collapsing "ecosystem." . . . ADA holders have a clear perspective: ultimately what they want is the price of ADA and staking rewards. ADA holders define "ecosystem collapse" as "a collapse in the ADA price and a drop in staking rewards." Increased spending from the treasury is clearly linked to these two so it's logical for ADA holders to believe that if no results are achieved from it increased spending from the treasury will lead to"
X Link 2026-02-09T00:37Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"@CSWAP_Destroy "There is a relationship between past spending and current transaction volume." Yes that's what we want to see. And strictly speaking some things are related and some aren't. Which ones are related and how much did they increase transactions That's the core question imo 👀"
X Link 2026-02-09T02:49Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Yes let's do some research first. What is the investment associated with the transaction NCL can change at any time. If it's true that we've made very few wise investments in the past I think it would be wise to research what wise investments are before deciding to continue with those unwise investments. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020697420783575301 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020697420783575301"
X Link 2026-02-09T03:13Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"@phillewisit @nimuepool @cardanocuria @EasternCardano @phil_uplc If the ECC decided not to vote on NCLs or info actions in the future I think the amount of work involved would be reduced 👀"
X Link 2026-02-09T03:16Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"You said "The new text may have more work on the CC." So I'm trying to pinpoint what's taking so long So is it really the time it takes to reach the decision to "Not Vote" It may have taken some time to reach the decision to "Not Vote" on NCL this time but that time won't be required from next time onwards right So does that mean that ECC will need to spend time on deciding whether to "Not Vote" on info actions other than NCL It would certainly be better to describe how these are handled in v2.5 and later. I'll mention this to the Civic Committee for feedback thank you 🙏 @IntersectCIVICS"
X Link 2026-02-09T03:57Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Thank you I think I understand what you're trying to say. Under the old Constitution info actions were simply "expressions of opinion" not "constitutional" decisions. Under the new Constitution there is a possibility that "constitutional" decisions may be made. Therefore there is a possibility that the amount of work required to consider whether or not it is necessary to decide on the "constitutionality" of info actions may increase. If this is indeed causing a significant increase in work I think it would be better to improve it in v2.5 or later 🙏"
X Link 2026-02-09T07:41Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"@phillewisit @nimuepool @cardanocuria @EasternCardano @phil_uplc Oh I just realized this I had mistakenly thought that the ECC had made the decision that "NCL should not be voted on." 🙏 https://forum.cardano.org/t/eastern-cardano-council-statement-to-the-cardano-community/152896u=eastern_cc https://forum.cardano.org/t/eastern-cardano-council-statement-to-the-cardano-community/152896u=eastern_cc"
X Link 2026-02-09T07:44Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"I have just noticed that ECC has stopped voting GA submitters please be aware of this impact this means that ECC will automatically vote NO on all GAs until ECC resumes voting 👀 Eastern Cardano Council statement to the Cardano Community A new Cardano Constitution has now been enacted on-chain. Our vote on the Governance Action that presented it to the Cardano Community: gov_action1jxne7hynfd7frcczwumd2eggps4kvy0msjztz9t0mutpy870ksgqqp6vps addressed how Eastern Cardano Council statement to the Cardano Community A new Cardano Constitution has now been enacted on-chain. Our vote on the"
X Link 2026-02-09T07:48Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"For the proposal to reduce the minimum Constitutional Committee size (committeeMinSize) from [--] to 5: Today (Feb 9) is the final day of the minimum 90-day off-chain consultation period (counted from Nov [--] 2025). Please share any feedback by Feb [--] 23:59 UTC. 🙏 https://forum.cardano.org/t/pcp-005-committeeminsize-yuta/151156u=yuta_oishi https://forum.cardano.org/t/pcp-005-committeeminsize-yuta/151156u=yuta_oishi"
X Link 2026-02-09T10:18Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"If you have time please consider voting for Increase Transaction and Block Memory Units (Part [--] of 2) as an SPO 🙏 @Official_Upbit @BlockdaemonHQ @staked_us @Cardanians_io @InputOutputHK @cryptorecruitr @moonstake @cardanobloom @emurgo_io @nedscave @AzureADA @P2Pvalidator @ada_pilot @cwpaulm @intocryptoverse @CardanoLand @BRAVOstakepool @onyxstakepool https://adastat.net/governances/c21b00f90f18fce4003edf42b0b0d455126e01c946e80cc5341a9f9750caf79500 https://adastat.net/governances/c21b00f90f18fce4003edf42b0b0d455126e01c946e80cc5341a9f9750caf79500"
X Link 2026-02-10T00:45Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"@Hornan7 @BeatriceAnihiri I know it's a little late but I'd love to hear if there's any documentation on solutions for this situation 🙏"
X Link 2026-02-10T10:37Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"I understand what you're saying but my question is (A) who can implement the following and (B) by when Both have failed before. [--] Coordinating the election of CC members 8-9. [--] Designing CC rewards based on that and reaching consensus between CC and DRep. I think it would probably be easier to achieve this if we assumed we would maintain the current seven CC members. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021204573701144888 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021204573701144888"
X Link 2026-02-10T12:48Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"No. we're talking about a "minimum" number of CCs here. It's the threshold below which CCs will stop working. So - if you want to keep actual number of CCs at [--] you'd be better off with a minimum number of CCs of [--]. - if you want to keep the minimum number of CCs at [--] you'd be better off with an actual number of CCs like [--] or 11"
X Link 2026-02-10T13:43Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Hello ECC I appreciate your contributions but as one of the DRep who voted for you in the CC election I am beginning to feel a heavy sense of responsibility for my choice. I hope you will announce the resumption date as soon as possible 🙏🙇 Constitution v2.4 was published on-chain on December [--] [----] and [--] days (8 weeks) have now passed. Counting from January [--] [----] the voting deadline for Constitution v2.4 [--] days (more than [--] weeks) have now passed. Other CCs are operating as usual 🙏🙇 Eastern Cardano Council statement to the Cardano Community A new Cardano Constitution has now been"
X Link 2026-02-12T01:23Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Midnight3💪💪💪 Midnight mainnet is coming. On the #ConsensusHK stage we shared that Midnight mainnet will officially go live before the end of March. This marks a major milestone and the beginning of a live production network designed to support early applications built around selective https://t.co/FTZOggTo0Y Midnight mainnet is coming. On the #ConsensusHK stage we shared that Midnight mainnet will officially go live before the end of March. This marks a major milestone and the beginning of a live production network designed to support early applications built around selective"
X Link 2026-02-12T07:18Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"Thank you. I've thought about this. It may depend on how you set the parameters. Assuming the current N_d(drepTargetNum) = [---] the strategy to maximize rewards is to create as many DReps with 30M ADA delegations as possible. For example there is no point in a 30M ADA DRep splitting to create three 10M ADA DReps. This would result in less than half the rewards of creating one 30M ADA DRep. In other words it all depends on how you predict the behavior of the top [--] DReps currently holding more than 30M ADA delegations. Personally I think that in most cases of these top [--] DReps creating"
X Link 2026-02-13T13:51Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"Thank you. I've come up with a rough idea based on the materials and information you provided. Perhaps instead of running it at the ledger level we should first run a TW like an incentivized testnet and distribute rewards to test what kind of behavioral change DRep experiences. 🙏 https://x.com/yutazzz/status/2022219302490059104s=20 https://x.com/yutazzz/status/2022219302490059104s=20"
X Link 2026-02-13T14:49Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Yes rather than influencing delegators this model expects DRep (not delegators) to behave in the following way: "DReps with delegations of less than 30M ADA will desperately gather delegators until they reach 30M ADA in order to maximize rewards. Once they exceed 30M ADA they will stop soliciting delegations." Note that 30M is the result of 6b ADA effective delegation amount / [---] so it will change if N_d (drepTargetNum) is changed or if the effective delegation amount of 6b ADA changes. If we were to tamper with the DRep reward model for delegators the amount could become enormous. One way"
X Link 2026-02-13T14:55Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"I have drafted a Net Change Limit of [---] Million ADA for Epochs [------]. If you have any concerns please let me know by February 7th 00:00 UTC 🙏 🔸Abstract This governance action proposes a Net Change Limit of [---------------] lovelace (300 million ADA) for the period from the start of Epoch [---] (13 February 2026) to the end of Epoch [---] (3 July 2027). Upon approval in accordance with the Constitution this NCL shall apply to Epochs [------] and supersede any previously agreed NCL for the same period. 🔸Motivation This governance action is required to establish a Net Change Limit for a defined"
X Link 2026-02-06T14:57Z 10.6K followers, 11K engagements

"@Richard_Irving_ @Quantumplation @SmaugPool AQUA_Vote @HolgerCardano24 OREKA_Vote @OSAKA_Pool_ada Clean_Eyes @Cardanians_io Micah ATLAS_Wolfgang @StakeWithPride @LucasMacchia2 ABBA --- with Good Music to Success Shota stakit (sti) by TOBG ONYX AI DRep Daehan_kor @STORM_Partners @dori_coin @dRep_Voshe https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2009073099963290085 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2009073099963290085"
X Link 2026-01-08T01:22Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"I am voting YES for a 300M ADA NCL. 1) I agree with the logic of limiting spending to below 300M ADA the previous year's inflow. 2) Additionally a 350M ADA NCL was proposed on January [--] [----] but the price has fallen by nearly 30% since the proposal was submitted temporarily falling to the level of January [----] before Shelley d=0. Under these circumstances I believe it is necessary to more strictly reconsider Budget priorities and protect ADA holders from excessive inflation. 🚨 NEW GOVERNANCE ACTION ALERT 🚨 🏷 Type: Info Action 🔗 Details: https://t.co/VZySGLLnU7 #Cardano #Blockchain"
X Link 2026-02-07T04:23Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Has anyone written a CIP for the DRep_delegation_saturation related parameters (which are like the DRep equivalent of the pool_ k(N) parameter)"
X Link 2026-02-11T15:26Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"DRep delegation change from January to February: In broad terms Japanese DReps decreased by 12M ADA while institutional DReps (EMURGO/Everstake/Blockdaemon) increased by 65M ADA (EMURGO is 10M away from reaching 1B ADA delegation) 👀"
X Link 2026-02-12T06:44Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Thank you so the next thing that probably comes up is how to distribute the rewards. It's probably best to leave that up to Intersect but I'm a little worried about how many DReps will be opposed to Intersect handing out rewards just like some CCs were against receiving rewards from Intersect. 🙏"
X Link 2026-02-15T16:02Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Personally a hard cap on voting power was what I had originally imagined so I intuitively agree. This may probably start with the launch of CIP. Personally I think these two ideas are not contradictory and can be discussed simultaneously. Both Constitution v1.0 and v2.4 suggest the need to provide rewards for DReps and CCs in TENET4 and the community agrees so I think we'll reach the conclusion that rewards are necessary either way. Considering that some DReps have refused CC rewards because there were no DRep rewards I think implementing DRep rewards is an important step toward realizing CC"
X Link 2026-02-16T01:58Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Hello @Cerkoryn Thank you for the information. I have a simple question. Is the reason there is no CIP for the hard cap of voting power in DRep because it is thought that the disadvantage of significantly reducing the number of active ada is too great (Is this the same reason why there is no hard cap for block generation power in SPO) https://x.com/hix_coffeepool/status/2023076436727500956s=20 https://x.com/JaromirTesar/status/2022327553550070114s=20 https://x.com/hix_coffeepool/status/2023076436727500956s=20 https://x.com/JaromirTesar/status/2022327553550070114s=20"
X Link 2026-02-16T02:05Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"DRep 8-9🙏 UIUX🙏 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023669788879564813 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023669788879564813"
X Link 2026-02-17T08:04Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"10🙏 sipo-54top10DRep Yuta- 0.5% 0.5%SPOK1000SPO40MDRep0.5%30M SPOsipoSPO76M300MSPO🙏 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023735054216950099 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023735054216950099"
X Link 2026-02-17T12:23Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"Thank you for this excellent article. It clearly articulates a concern that has come up repeatedly in the feedback on the Constitution v2.4 process: namely that off-chain deliberation and consultation were insufficient. If I had to summarize the article in one sentence that would be its core message. At an intuitive level this argument makes sense. More consultation generally leads to better outcomes and the fact that a process included deliberation can make it easier for members who disagreed with the final result to accept it. In that sense off-chain consultation can improve both substance"
X Link 2026-01-22T10:49Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"In v2.4 "3 months" became "90 days." This change was InputEndorsers' idea and I like it because the exact date of "3 months" is a bit unclear. Thank you @InputEndorsers I think [--] days from November [--] [----] when this forum topic was created would be February [--] [----] so I think the submission needs to be made after that date. 🙏 https://forum.cardano.org/t/pcp-005-committeeminsize-yuta/151156/11u=yuta_oishi https://github.com/cardanoz/constitution/blob/main/constitution-v24.md https://forum.cardano.org/t/pcp-005-committeeminsize-yuta/151156/11u=yuta_oishi"
X Link 2026-01-22T13:54Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"This change was made a long time ago and voting ended on 2025/9/7 6:44:50 with nearly 76% of DReps thoroughly reviewing and voting YES/NO on Constitution v2.0. More than four months have passed since then and voting on v2.3 has been conducted. Naturally 80% of DReps have thoroughly reviewed and voted on v2.4 so what does the low participation rate mean 👀 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014348345511383320 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014348345511383320"
X Link 2026-01-22T14:44Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Ultimately I believe cost is the main trade-off for off-chain processes. Furthermore I believe that "it is not easy to produce effective results through consultations that justify the cost." Implementing DRep consultations requires a lot of gritty work. Please note that some DReps will get angry in a very serious tone if you tag them with X and some DReps have declared that they will automatically vote NO if you send them a DM. Some DReps are very busy and do not respond and some DReps are not interested in such governance actions. Some DReps are not interested in consultations. To be honest"
X Link 2026-01-22T15:42Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Thank you for sharing your view and for the effort youve clearly put into articulating it. I appreciate the seriousness with which you are engaging in this discussion. That said I believe the argument as presented contains several methodological issues that are significant in the context of constitutional and governance design. I will focus strictly on the structure of the reasoning itself. [--]. Reduction of institutional analysis to inferred motivations The core issue under discussion is the scope limits and institutional role of the Constitutional Committee (CC) within the Cardano"
X Link 2026-01-23T21:46Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Yes I use AI heavily such as Google Translate. I'm a non-English speaker. I apologize for my lack of ability and I hope we can return to our original constructive discussion. 🔦🚨Now I get why this felt so off It was all AI This is an interesting scenario. Six months ago you posted that you were using Google translate to reply to me and that you "rely heavily" on it (see August screenshot below). Nothing wrong with that. You also mentioned AI. https://t.co/quh8TbZJXc 🔦🚨Now I get why this felt so off It was all AI This is an interesting scenario. Six months ago you posted that you were using"
X Link 2026-01-24T02:00Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"@NaVi_GaT0R Thank you for your kind words🙏 At the same time I admit that using "I'm a non-English speaker" as an excuse is a bit uncool in the global ecosystem. By pure coincidence I bought a new English learning program a few days ago. Little by little things are getting better 🙏"
X Link 2026-01-24T14:01Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"I cannot accept the expression "Constitution v2.4 created by AI" but at the same time the expression "Constitution v2.4 created by Yuta" may not be wrong but it feels very strange. Most of the final wording was revised by many DRep and community members including you. In particular the revision comments made by you and CF were very detailed and wide-ranging and I'm very grateful to you 🙏 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2015064354031579519 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2015064354031579519"
X Link 2026-01-24T14:09Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"@InputEndorsers @adamKDean @ArmyofSpies Not only have we never met we've never had an online meeting we've never heard each other's voices we've never even exchanged DMs or emails but you've introduced many changes to Constitution v2.4 💪"
X Link 2026-01-24T14:15Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"@hoskytoken @ArmyofSpies I'll be honest and admit that using "I'm a non-English speaker" as an excuse is a bit uncool in the global ecosystem. It's pure coincidence but a few days ago I paid for a new English learning program. Little by little it's getting better 🙏"
X Link 2026-01-24T14:17Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"Hello Army of Spies I have already responded to your claim at the level of facts and assertion. If you continue to maintain that factual understanding and assertion could you please let me know what you think of this response You have already quoted and reposted this assertion-level post and I pointed out in my own quoted and repost that there are problems with the logical structure of that quote and repost. Simply put it relies on ad hominem attacks and logic that shifts the subject to unverifiable "motives" which I believe is a classic argumentative fallacy that has been around since the"
X Link 2026-01-24T22:25Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Clarification on Constitution v2.4 and the Use of AI I would like to clarify my use of AI in relation to Constitution v2.4. Due to shortcomings in my explanations or wording that conveyed unintended nuance I may have caused confusion. This responsibility lies with me and I apologize for that. The core question is whether my use of AI rose to a level that would reasonably require disclosure that the Constitution was rewritten by AI. Below I will explain why my use of AI did not reach that level. Broadly speaking my use of AI falls into four categories: 1.Translation tools 2.Formal checks"
X Link 2026-01-26T00:19Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"@defi411 The great thing is that anyone can submit v2.5 and even if it doesn't pass you can read the DRep voting rationale for it and analyze why it didn't pass within a month. So that's what I did.🙏"
X Link 2026-01-26T07:10Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"@phillewisit @NicolasC3rny Thank you Phil Generally speaking I agree that it would be better to have more editorial decision makers on the draft constitution. 🙏"
X Link 2026-01-26T14:21Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"@SyncAI_Network Thank you but personally I think it might be better to only list DReps below a certain delegation amount as delegation recommendations 🙏"
X Link 2026-01-30T00:07Z 10.5K followers, [---] engagements

"@longminswap Great article this discussion always comes to mind when I hear the words "real-world use cases" and "RealFi""
X Link 2026-01-30T00:30Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"Thank you I don't actually oppose expanding the number of CCs. Generally speaking it's a good idea and I'm voting in favor of the GA. However looking at the results of the last DRep vote it seems unlikely that this will be easily realized. Also considering DRep's vote on CC rewards which shows that DRep feels that even offering rewards for [--] CCs is high [--] or more CCs is probably beyond the number that DRep considers to be economically reasonable to support the activity. By the way I voted YES for CC rewards and am not opposed to it. However generally speaking I think it's a good argumentthank"
X Link 2026-02-03T01:33Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"Thank you Phil I agree. I'll add a bit more detail. 🙏 Let's say we know that under the old Constitution most Budget Info Actions were not if implemented properly. In my opinion the better options are [--] [--] [--] and [--]. That is I don't think [--] is desirable but it's better than [--]. [--]. Remove Budget Info Action from the Constitution making it optional rather than "mandatory." This doesn't stop entities that voluntarily want to do this properly but there's no need to ignore repeated cases where it's not if implemented properly. [--]. Leave Budget Info Action in the Constitution and improve the wording"
X Link 2026-02-03T15:11Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"v2.4ADADRep v1.0v1.0v2.491330 CCCCCCCCCC7991000 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018836058700685499 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018836058700685499"
X Link 2026-02-03T23:56Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"Since the submission of the NCL=350mADA governance action (January 10th) the price of ADA has decreased by 38.46%"
X Link 2026-02-06T01:12Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Hi Alex thank you I like this because it looks mathematically beautiful. However the 300m ADA NCL is an information action intended to slightly reduce the 350M ADA NCL amount that will be set in a few days. Therefore I expect that the proposal for a permanent equation-style NCL will likely not be supported at this time when the ADA rate is declining since it is basically automatically approved every year and has the opposite vector effect of reduction. 🙏 So while I like this theory I think the timing of submitting it this month may be bad. 🙏"
X Link 2026-02-06T16:00Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"@silversoul8668 @shaggyrax If you check the screenshot you'll see that there are YES and NO responses among the top [--] DRep. Since there are so many replies it's difficult to discuss so I've consolidated the responses into the next post. Please check the next post. thank you 🙏 https://x.com/yutazzz/status/2019965756264604092s=20 @silversoul8668 Hi Gintama thank you So you want to know when I first bought ADA I looked it up. It was July [--] [----]. I'm a terrible trader. I was thinking about saying "I answered your question so please answer my original two questions too" but I'll stop here"
X Link 2026-02-07T02:50Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Thank you but.Please keep in mind that sending GAs takes time and money (locking up [------] ada for a month and losing staking rewards) and I don't receive any direct compensation for it like Intersect does. Yes this is just my personal whining so please ignore it. If you want to prevent "spam GAs" from the community and limit them to "refined GAs" from Intersect it would be effective to increase the GA deposit several times. If the deposit were several times higher I would probably stop sending spam GAs that lower NCL"
X Link 2026-02-07T03:01Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Ive drafted a CARDANO BLOCKCHAIN ECOSYSTEM CONSTITUTION v1.1 and Im opening it up for feedback until June 3rd 00:00 UTC. Feel free to comment on google docs directly 👀 🎯 Purpose The main goal of this revision is to simplify and clarify the content. This helps reduce the workload of the Constitutional Committee which is currently the biggest bottleneck in submitting Treasury withdrawal governance actions. 🔄 Key Changes (1) Removal of the Budget Info governance action * Reason 1: The original intent was to create a comprehensive ecosystem-wide Budget but this no longer reflects current"
X Link 2025-05-28T11:22Z 10.6K followers, 10.1K engagements

"#Cardano How to get the biggest $NIGHT airdrop 💪 Target - Wallets with $100 or more of $ADA $BTC $XRP $BNB $AVA $ETH $SOL $BAT at 0:00 UTC on June 11th 1) After the airdrop event starts in July claim within [--] days from the portal at the following site. After [--] days you can participate in simple mining from the same link for another [--] days to get more. At this stage it is still locked. 2) After the mainnet 1/4 will be unlocked every [--] days and you can receive it. If you can become a validator and get more For details see the above link https://midnight.gd/how-to-get-night#claim"
X Link 2025-06-26T14:10Z 10.6K followers, 11.4K engagements

"The Cardano booth was a big hit One thing I learned from my time at Blockchain EXPO including other exhibits is that the current trend in blockchain use cases in Japan may be "regional revitalization through NFT stamp rallies." Most of the large popular booths near the entrance were for this service. To be honest regional revitalization stamp rallies may not be that helpful in increasing on-chain transactions but it may be a good business opportunity. imo"
X Link 2025-10-10T07:13Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Catalyst projects with no updates for over [--] months: Please submit a change request or POA ASAP as they may be automatically canceled No updates for over [--] year: [--] (10M ADA) No updates for over [--] months: [---] (30M ADA) No updates for over [--] months: [---] (42M ADA)"
X Link 2025-10-23T00:49Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Has anyone successfully received the first challenge for Skarvenger Mining If so how much CPU did it consume 👀 (I probably failed to receive the first challenge) Scavenger Mine begins tomorrow October [--] at 00:00 UTC. Are you registered yet Over 22K+ have already pre-registered. Dont miss your chance to join from day one. Reminders: 🖥 Desktop / Laptop only 🤝 Open to everyone 🚫 No DMs or support on social FAQs: Scavenger Mine begins tomorrow October [--] at 00:00 UTC. Are you registered yet Over 22K+ have already pre-registered. Dont miss your chance to join from day one. Reminders: 🖥"
X Link 2025-10-30T00:13Z 10.6K followers, 18.2K engagements

"I'm a long-time LQ (liqwid) holder and I know there is LQ governance and I know there is something like LQ DRep but I haven't participated in any voting or even delegated. There's no deep reason for that. What I'm trying to say is that I can really understand the feelings of ADA holders who aren't interested in Cardano governance. 👀 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1996502276618522823 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1996502276618522823"
X Link 2025-12-04T08:50Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"Yes.While having a single decentralized working group lead a comprehensive constitutional amendment process might generally be a good idea it could be a huge amount of work. At least if this was a requirement for submitting a constitutional amendment GA I would have given up on working on the constitutional amendment process. 🙏 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2016411601725984945 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2016411601725984945"
X Link 2026-01-28T07:22Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Thank you. 🙏 So in conclusion do you think that regarding this issue there is no need to amend the wording of the old Constitution and that only amendments to its implementation are necessary 🙏 If amendments to the wording of the old Constitution were necessary what specific amendments would they entail https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018628968195502183 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018628968195502183"
X Link 2026-02-03T10:13Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Thank you I understand. 🙏 I have a further question. I believe you have seen the article about the [----] budget process which was written under the old constitution but structurally it is almost identical to the [----] process. So I have a simple question. Who specifically will be responsible for getting the community including Intersect to change the way the old constitution is implemented without changing the wording of the old constitution https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018639853089616247 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018639853089616247"
X Link 2026-02-03T10:57Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Thank you Phil🙏. I'm trying to understand your logic. To simplify your logic is the following understanding correct [--] Under the old Constitution there were cases where it was implemented appropriately and cases where it wasn't. [--] Generally there were more cases where it wasn't implemented (the Oceania budget being an exception) but you believe that this is a freedom and not a problem. [--] Under the new Constitution only cases where it is not implemented appropriately remain. [--] Therefore you are concerned about the changes to the new Constitution. If the above understanding is correct further"
X Link 2026-02-03T11:29Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Sorry I'm losing track of your logic. With the help of grok I rearranged your logic is this correct thank you Phil 🙏 [--]. Under the old constitution the Budget Info Action could provide excellent checks and balances if implemented properly. [--]. The failures in [----] were not caused by the wording of the constitution but by the governance action proposers (especially Intersect) choosing a suboptimal way to implement it. [--]. Therefore there was no need to change or remove the old constitutions wording it would have been enough to just improve how it was used (the implementation"
X Link 2026-02-03T13:16Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Thank you Phil 🙏 I think I finally understand the reason for our disagreement. 🙏 My argument is premised on the assumption that if the wording of the old Constitution remains unchanged and there is no entity responsible for closely monitoring and guiding this implementation the above if implemented properly would be highly unlikely. This is because at least that has been the case up until now and will continue to be the case for Budget [----]. You probably disagree with this assumption which is why our discussion is at a standstill. While we agree that there is disagreement here the new"
X Link 2026-02-03T14:30Z 10.6K followers, [--] engagements

"Day [--] of the #Cardano Kizuna side event gathered feedback on [--] new Cardano roadmap items and [---] Cardano Budget items from the Japanese DRep IOG and Intersect committee members @benohanlon @therealdisasm @adamKDean @ADAFrog_Pool @seira_yun @Satoshi15121937 @AKYO_POOL @CardanoMiyatake @buxdabomb @sidan_lab https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PoObHcb93-3eNUyxKb6fAwkZTHm5din1aDZwH1EiCdQ/editusp=sharing Kicking off Day [--] in Japan with @seira_yun @yutazzz @taichiyokoyama @Cryptofly777 @therealdisasm @adamKDean @ADAFrog_Pool @JBriggsLondon. https://t.co/z0OSfJkifb"
X Link 2025-03-08T08:58Z 10.6K followers, 16K engagements

"I am voting NO on "DeltaDeFi: Hydra Trading Infrastructure Budget (1500000)". Treasury withdrawal leads to ADA inflation for ADA holders so the benefits to ADA holders need to be explained. I think Hydra-related products tend to have a hard time justifying this. 1) Adoption of Hydra products does not increase the number of L1 transactions. If DeltaDeFi wins in competition with Minswap or similar platforms it may actually decrease them. For Hydra products the number of L1 transactions is hardly a useful metric and from the ADA holder's perspective it does not increase staking rewards or ADA"
X Link 2026-01-06T15:33Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

"@HolgerCardano24 @Richard_Irving_ @SmaugPool @OSAKA_Pool_ada @Cardanians_io @StakeWithPride @LucasMacchia2 Sorry for tagging you 🙏"
X Link 2026-01-09T14:47Z 10.6K followers, [---] engagements

"Please cast your YES/NO/Abstaion vote on CARDANO BLOCKCHAIN ECOSYSTEM CONSTITUTION v2.4 when you have time (13 days left until voting deadline) I will be mentioning [--] active dreps with over 15M ADA delegates who have not yet voted (Because the deadline is approaching I'm including DReps who said they would vote later just in case.) @emurgo_io @BlockdaemonHQ @eternlwallet @Cardano_CF @jasonappleton @SebastienGllmt @btbfpark @armyofspies @astroboysoup @bigpey @Wiiinnie @hix_coffeepool @tempo_vote @stakenuts @KyosukeTakatuki @hisa_iokinawa @AichiStakePool @TheOCcryptobro @ItsDave_ADA"
X Link 2026-01-07T07:24Z 10.6K followers, [----] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing