@CryptoPeng Avatar @CryptoPeng Crypto Peng

Crypto Peng posts on X about liquidity, bitcoin, bearish, level the most. They currently have [---] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [---] engagements in the last [--] hours.

Engagements: [---] #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: [--] #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: [---] #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: [---------] #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence cryptocurrencies 57% finance 49% exchanges 5% travel destinations 1% stocks 1% automotive brands 1%

Social topic influence liquidity #2895, bitcoin 18%, bearish #426, level 11%, bullish 7%, $btc 6%, $eth #1713, trend 5%, zone #1579, just a 5%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @cryptobirb @markcullen @cryptorover @apsk32

Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) Ethereum (ETH) Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Solana (SOL) Internet Computer (ICP)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"A Real Trading System Is Built for Survival Not Profit Most traders enter the market obsessed with one question: How much can I make They optimize for higher returns. They chase better entries. They tweak strategies to increase win rate. Everything revolves around maximizing profit. Professionals think differently. A real trading system is not designed to maximize profit. It is designed to maximize survival. Profit is episodic. Survival is structural. Anyone can have a great month. Very few can stay in the game for a decade. The market does not eliminate you slowly. It eliminates you when"
X Link 2026-02-12T09:21Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"From the perspective of my dual EMA system both $SOL and $ETH are still in clear daily bearish alignment. The [--] EMA is below the [--] EMA and both are trending downward with the [---] EMA acting as higher-timeframe pressure. Structurally the dominant trend remains down. However after an accelerated sell-off price is now significantly extended below the 20/60 EMA ribbon. When price stretches too far from the short-term averages the probability of a mean reversion bounce increases. On SOL the sharp flush followed by a strong lower wick near prior lows suggests short-term exhaustion. As long as the"
X Link 2026-02-13T16:09Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"This is a reasonable roadmap if you look at it structurally rather than emotionally. From a higher timeframe perspective Bitcoin is still trading below key resistance clusters and under a declining trend structure. A short-term rally into overhead supply whether thats prior support turned resistance Ichimoku cloud resistance or a reclaim attempt of broken weekly levels would be technically normal. But unless that rally shifts the structure (higher high on HTF reclaim and hold above major resistance momentum expansion) its just a bounce within a broader corrective phase. The real bottom"
X Link 2026-02-14T12:31Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Opened a new $ICP long at [-----] during tonights live session. Price has now reclaimed the EMA/MA20 which is the key trigger in my system. ICP might not be a mainstream coin but one thing I like about it is the relatively clean price action. It tends to respect the EMA/MA20 well. Once a trend starts it often rides that moving average either consistently down or consistently up. That kind of structure makes execution much cleaner. Currently holding three longs: $ETH long from [----] $SOL long from [----] $ICP long from [-----] As long as structure holds and stops are not triggered these are"
X Link 2026-02-14T16:09Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"SSR sitting around [---] is not random. Thats the equilibrium zone where BTC market cap and stablecoin liquidity are roughly balanced. Historically sustained moves lower in SSR signal expanding stablecoin firepower liquidity ready to deploy. Moves higher signal capital rotation back into BTC reduced dry powder. This level alone doesnt give direction. The break from equilibrium does. Watch for expansion not the number itself. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023029361952321696 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023029361952321696"
X Link 2026-02-15T13:39Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"My line: $200K in [--] years (range $150K$300K). Not because of a cloud because cycles usually top after the crowd stops fearing volatility. Conditions: Bull path: hold macro support (200W MA / power-curve support) then reclaim HTF structure next expansion wave. Bear delay: lose macro support on weekly/monthly and fail the reclaim the 4-year clock stretches. Price targets are easy. Structure decides timing"
X Link 2026-02-07T02:41Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Monthly RSI being stretched is a warning not a timing tool. It can stay overbought longer than most can stay solvent fading it. What matters is structure: As long as SPX holds the monthly trend support / channel this is still a bull market with air pockets. The real risk starts when we get a monthly breakdown + failed reclaim thats when 14% becomes 30%+. So yes expect a correction at some point but Id trade confirmation not astrology or RSI alone. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019966855625207851 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019966855625207851"
X Link 2026-02-07T02:50Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"I agree on one thing only: models dont protect you risk management does. I dont anchor on 59K as a bottom. In stressed regimes price doesnt respect models channels or probabilities. It respects liquidity and forced positioning. When tail risk shows up markets overshoot far beyond where it should stop. Thats why I treat all bottoms as zones not levels and size risk assuming models can fail completely. Survival comes first. Profits come later. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020515685831717125 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020515685831717125"
X Link 2026-02-08T15:10Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Based on the 4H structure this is still a bearish market. Price is currently holding around the [--] EMA ribbon (green) which explains the short-term bounce. Thats normal after a sharp sell-off. But as long as BTC remains below the [--] EMA and especially the [---] EMA ribbons this move is just a corrective rebound not a trend reversal. For me: [--] EMA = short-term support [--] / [---] EMA = overhead supply Until price reclaims those higher ribbons with acceptance I still view rallies as relief not strength. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020691650662826088"
X Link 2026-02-09T02:50Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Im aligned on treating BTC as a range market for now. The key for me isnt the exact levels but the behavior at them. Failure to accept above the prior range highs turns 7476K into a sell zone not because its high but because value isnt being built there. On the downside 5254K is where Id expect responsive buying if we see exhaustion and structure stabilization. Until then 63K remains fair value a natural magnet in a balanced market. Trade the range respect acceptance. Dont force direction. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020897338676703654 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020897338676703654"
X Link 2026-02-09T16:27Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"This is actually one of the more important signals beneath the noise. When BTC dominates collateral through a full cycle especially during drawdowns it tells you something price alone doesnt: trust under stress. Borrowers arent rotating into BTC for trades theyre anchoring credit risk to it. Thats a very different behavior from speculation. Using BTC as primary collateral means holders expect long-term value preservation not short-term volatility plays. From a market structure standpoint this reinforces BTCs role as base collateral in crypto not just another asset to rotate out of."
X Link 2026-02-10T00:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Im aligned with this view. A 5% pullback here wouldnt change the trend it would improve it. After a 10-month win streak markets dont need a crash they need a reset in positioning and expectations. Filling the [--------] area would make sense structurally and psychologically. Its the kind of dip that refreshes risk appetite without breaking market confidence. Strong trends dont die from small pullbacks. They die from never having them. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021021969144217827 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021021969144217827"
X Link 2026-02-10T00:42Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Thats exactly the right question to ask. A true sentiment shift doesnt just sweep lows it reclaims value. If last week was genuinely a reversal price should have had no trouble closing back above the 73.7K76.5K S/R zone. The failure there tells me the sweep was reactive not initiative. Liquidity was taken but acceptance never followed. Until that area is reclaimed and held bullish narratives are premature this remains a market trying to stabilize not one ready to trend higher. Reclaim first. Talk bullish later. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021110839873503560"
X Link 2026-02-10T06:35Z [---] followers, [----] engagements

"I agree that early growth shows up in activity before price but price doesnt follow narratives it follows acceptance. Rising stablecoin transactions tell us liquidity and usage are building on Ethereum which is constructive. But for price to follow that liquidity has to stay and take risk not just move through the network. So I see this as a necessary condition not a sufficient one. Great backdrop improving fundamentals now price still needs to reclaim structure to confirm the thesis. Activity sets the stage. Price decides when the play actually starts."
X Link 2026-02-10T07:41Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"I agree the 200W EMA is doing its job as a reference but Im more focused on what happens around it not just at it. Holding a major EMA doesnt equal demand it just slows price down. For a meaningful bounce I want to see acceptance above reclaimed levels not just wick reactions. Until then this still looks like a process of digestion rather than resolution. Time-based capitulation matters more here than price-based targets. Without it bounces are reactive not structural. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021128819894255699 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021128819894255699"
X Link 2026-02-10T07:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"The TWAP activity makes sense but Im cautious about over-interpreting it. Institutional DCA can absorb supply and slow downside but it doesnt automatically resolve structure. We saw the same behavior in [----] steady buying extended consolidation yet price still needed exhaustion and acceptance before a real shift. So far this looks like balance being maintained not direction being decided. As long as price stays stuck in value time is still doing the work not price. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021244097860927999 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021244097860927999"
X Link 2026-02-10T15:25Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@crypto_birb $69.4K isnt a signal its a test. Post-distribution price is compressing volatility cooling but structure is still damaged. Until BTC reclaims and accepts above HTF levels this is balance after damage not trend resumption. Patience prediction here"
X Link 2026-02-10T16:18Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"I see it the same way. $69K isnt just a price its memory. Eight months of consolidation + the [----] top turned this zone into a major decision area. Weak momentum here doesnt surprise me. If price holds and keeps rotating this range keeps getting reinforced. If we break lower this zone only becomes heavier resistance on the way back up. Either way this is balance not trend. Momentum will tell us when that changes and its not there yet. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021257949319135342 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021257949319135342"
X Link 2026-02-10T16:20Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Agreed this is where opportunity starts not where it confirms. Red zones like this tell you selling pressure is dominant and growth is slowing thats exactly when risk/reward begins to flip. But these conditions define a window not a bottom. In [----] [----] [----] price didnt reverse immediately it based absorbed supply and only then moved. Same here: this is accumulation territory not instant gratification. Opportunity shows up early. Confirmation comes later. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021259431766524281 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021259431766524281"
X Link 2026-02-10T16:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Agree on the pivots. For me this comes down to acceptance vs rejection around the weekly high. A clean reclaim and hold above 72.2k shifts weekly flow bullish and opens continuation longs. Failure to do so keeps this as a liquidity hunt environment with lower levels still attractive for responsive bids. Let price prove intent no need to front-run either scenario. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021265798308958521 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021265798308958521"
X Link 2026-02-10T16:51Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Structurally BTC is still trading within a long-term ascending channel and has not yet tagged the lower boundary. If another leg down unfolds a test of the channel support around 58kslightly below the prior lowremains plausible. As long as the lower bound holds this should be treated as a corrective move within the broader trend not a trend reversal. Acceptance and stabilization in that zone would offer a higher R/R opportunity for mid-term positioning. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021390418714427626 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021390418714427626"
X Link 2026-02-11T01:06Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"ETH relative strength vs BTC during a drawdown is meaningful. Its not about ETH going up its about not breaking down at the same rate. When BTC leads lower and ETH holds structure it usually signals selling pressure is fading and capital is starting to position selectively. Last time we saw this the market didnt moon immediately but the worst phase of the bear was already behind. I see this as a cycle signal not a short-term call. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021390863075787239 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021390863075787239"
X Link 2026-02-11T01:08Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"I dont agree with directly projecting the 2017/2021 parabolic top structure onto the current cycle. Market structure liquidity and participant composition are completely different now spot ETFs institutional exposure and derivatives depth materially change how drawdowns unfold. A move toward 32K isnt impossible but it would require a systemic liquidity event not just fractal symmetry. To me this looks more like an emotional extrapolation than a high-probability path. Trends dont repeat through fear price only moves when real supply shows up."
X Link 2026-02-11T01:09Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@mark_cullen Im on the same page here. Sweeping the Monday low was a necessary step but I agree that it may not be enough. Until we see a clean reversal from the demand zone Ill stay patient this could still take more time before the upside confirmation"
X Link 2026-02-11T05:40Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"I agree the alignment between business cycle lows and Bitcoin oversold levels is a key signal. The last time this happened was in [----] right before the parabolic run. With ISM now back above [--] and rate cuts in sight the macro environment is supportive. Institutions are clearly positioning and the chart shows that crypto is quietly setting up for the next move while retail remains distracted. Patience is key the structural foundation is there. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021462088460402718 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021462088460402718"
X Link 2026-02-11T05:51Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Large deposits dont automatically equal intent to dump. Yes [----] BTC hitting Binance twice is size but correlation isnt causation. Price dropped after the deposits but that doesnt prove the whale caused the move. In high-liquidity markets like BTC it often takes broader positioning imbalance to trigger a $3K slide not just one wallet. What matters more is follow-through: Do we see sustained sell pressure Is open interest expanding with the move Are bids getting pulled One actor can create volatility but trend shifts require participation. Watch structure not headlines."
X Link 2026-02-11T16:08Z [---] followers, [----] engagements

"This isnt insane volatility. Its positioning getting unwound. Post-data rallies driven by short-term liquidity often fade once the initial impulse exhausts. What were seeing is cross-asset de-risking equities roll over BTC follows alts amplify the move. Thats standard risk-off mechanics. A -0.3% move in the S&P and -0.35% in Nasdaq is not structural damage. Even BTC losing $66K isnt a regime shift unless we see continuation with expanding volume and OI. The key question isnt the headline drawdown. Its whether bids reappear at liquidity pools or if this turns into a sustained risk unwind. So"
X Link 2026-02-11T16:09Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Net outflows are structurally positive but context matters. 19k BTC leaving exchanges reduces immediate sell-side liquidity yes but outflows during downtrends can also reflect repositioning not necessarily accumulation. Coins moving to cold storage dont automatically mean aggressive spot demand. The real question is: Do we see price stability or expansion after supply tightens If outflows continue while price holds higher lows thats constructive. If outflows increase but price keeps making lower highs then derivatives and macro flows are still in control. Supply dynamics help at inflection"
X Link 2026-02-11T23:57Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"$BTC 67k critical support was broken and we swept liquidity below 66k. That box is cleared. Now the only thing that matters short term is a clean reclaim of 67.8k (H1 market structure lows). Without that this is still reactive price not reversal. Expect LTF chop. Another sweep of wicky lows wouldnt surprise me. Liquidity is thin and both sides are hunting. Bias: only interested in longs. Invalidation: below 64.4k. Upside targets: 71k72k. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021806786010140909 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021806786010140909"
X Link 2026-02-12T04:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"BTC/GOLD update Three months on and the message is unchanged: Gold continues to outperform Bitcoin. Not only is BTC underperforming on rallies its also dropping harder on pullbacks. That relative weakness matters. In risk-off phases capital rotates toward stability and right now gold is winning that rotation. Structure-wise the breakdown from the rising trendline confirms loss of relative momentum. The next logical magnet is the blue support zone below. Unless BTC reclaims relative strength quickly odds favor a visit into that demand area. Relative performance tells the real story here and"
X Link 2026-02-12T04:52Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"$ETH update Until we see a clean impulsive 5-wave move to the upside or at minimum a break above the weekend high downside risk remains elevated under the orange scenario. The bounce from last weeks low lacks impulsive characteristics. It still reads as corrective structure rather than the start of a sustained trend reversal. There is no technical confirmation that a meaningful low is in place. That said this region is technically significant. After a liquidation-driven flush its reasonable to monitor for reversal signals. But anticipation is not confirmation. For now structure first. Im"
X Link 2026-02-12T05:01Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Price is compressing near key intraday levels while liquidity builds below and overhead supply remains heavy. This type of structure often precedes expansion in volatility. The market doesnt warn twice. Either we reclaim resistance and squeeze higher or liquidity below gets cleared first. Prepare your levels. Define invalidation. Manage risk. Volatility is loading. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021812531577426084 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021812531577426084"
X Link 2026-02-12T05:04Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Most traders will glance at this chart and label it bearish. BTC topped at 71k and has been bleeding all week. Thats the surface-level take. Look deeper. Weve had persistent selling pressure for days and price is still holding around 67k. Thats only a 56% pullback from the local highs. For Bitcoin thats noise not structural damage. Direction alone doesnt define weakness. Magnitude does. If bears had real control we wouldnt be chopping 4k below highs after a full week of pressure wed be materially lower. Compression after sustained selling often signals absorption not collapse. Stay objective."
X Link 2026-02-12T05:05Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"From a monthly timeframe perspective Bitcoin is approaching a major structural support zone. The broader trend remains in a high-level corrective phase but two key long-term support areas stand out below current price. The first major support sits around $59500. This level aligns with the mid-term monthly moving averages and a prior high-volume consolidation area. It also represents a key cost basis zone from the previous expansion leg. If price revisits this region it is likely to trigger a significant reaction and strong two-way order flow. The second and stronger structural support lies"
X Link 2026-02-12T05:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"If youre looking at the World Uncertainty Index and thinking thats why BTC is weak thats only part of the story. Uncertainty alone doesnt break markets. Liquidity does. When uncertainty spikes capital shifts defensive. Risk gets repriced. Volatility expands. Positioning compresses. That creates pressure on risk assets like Bitcoin. But historically extreme uncertainty tends to show up near inflection points not during the middle of stable bull trends. What matters next is policy and liquidity response. The key question is not: Is uncertainty high The real question is: Is liquidity about to"
X Link 2026-02-12T07:43Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Monthly MACD bearish divergence and crossover are not signals you ignore. They mark regime shifts not minor pullbacks. That said context matters. In prior cycles the monthly MACD rollover aligned with: Parabolic extensions Extreme funding / leverage Blow-off tops Right now price is at $67K down yes but not in full capitulation structure yet. The key level isnt the signal itself. Its whether price accelerates on the downside with expanding volatility and failed reclaim attempts. $58K (the blue line) is a logical magnet. If that level gets tagged and holds the narrative flips fast. If it breaks"
X Link 2026-02-12T07:45Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"BTC has transitioned from support into resistance. The bounce off the lows currently counts as a 3-wave corrective structure not an impulsive move. That distinction matters. A 3-wave move into resistance typically signals counter-trend relief rather than trend reversal. Until we see a clean 5-wave expansion with strong momentum and acceptance above resistance this rally should be treated as corrective. If price rejects here the probability increases that this was simply a B-wave or lower high formation within a broader downside structure. Reclaim and hold above resistance = structure shifts."
X Link 2026-02-12T07:47Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"I disagree with the wait for the perfect bottom narrative. Markets dont reward perfection. They reward positioning. Yes the structure has weakened and this may be transitioning into a broader bear phase rather than a shallow correction. But the idea that there is always a clean obvious real bottom ahead is a dangerous assumption. Historically bottoms form during maximum uncertainty not after clarity returns. If this is a regime shift capital should be deployed strategically not emotionally scaling into high-conviction zones managing risk and preserving flexibility. Waiting for the perfect"
X Link 2026-02-12T09:36Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"$BTC is compressing beneath the $68K horizontal resistance and the short-term descending trendline. This is classic post-impulse consolidation after last weeks volatility expansion. Volatility contraction typically precedes expansion the only question is direction. As long as price remains capped below $68K and the diagonal trendline structure favors continuation to the downside or further chop within the wedge. A clean breakout and acceptance above $68K shifts momentum and opens the path toward the $72K liquidity cluster. Until that happens this is compression not strength. The move is"
X Link 2026-02-12T09:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"$BTC From a dual MA perspective this remains a clean bearish alignment. The 20D MA is below the 60D MA and price continues to trade under the ribbon. Every attempt to push into the moving averages results in rejection rather than acceptance. That tells us one thing: The daily structure is not repaired. Talking about an intraday flip of 68K is fine but unless BTC reclaims the 20D MA on a daily basis every bounce should be treated as a weak relief rally not a trend reversal. A real structural shift requires: A reclaim of the 20D MA The 20D flattening or curling upward Price no longer getting"
X Link 2026-02-12T17:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Based on the Bitcoin monthly chart the key support levels are around $59500 and $55500. These levels are critical for determining the potential continuation of the uptrend or the possibility of a deeper correction. If price holds above these levels the bullish structure remains intact. Otherwise a break below could indicate further downside risks. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022195643918561391 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022195643918561391"
X Link 2026-02-13T06:26Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"It appears Bitcoin has experienced one of the largest capitulation events in history as the realized losses reach new levels comparable to the [----] crash. This could signal an extended period of weakness and uncertainty but as history shows such capitulation often marks a bottom before a potential rebound. Investors and traders should remain vigilant especially considering the possible opportunities for long-term accumulation after such significant corrections. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022203132617666998 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022203132617666998"
X Link 2026-02-13T06:56Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"It seems that $ETH is experiencing relatively low volatility compared to $BTC after the initial breakdown. For Ethereum to regain momentum against Bitcoin it will need to break and hold above the [----] level. If this level isn't reclaimed it's likely that $ETH will continue its downward trajectory potentially testing the [-----] support level next. The key here is observing price action closely for any confirmation of a shift in momentum. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022230837966635345 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022230837966635345"
X Link 2026-02-13T08:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Bitcoin remains in a weakened state and Im choosing to remain patient before entering my next trade. I recently closed my last position with a profit of $125000. I will continue to watch for key levels and wait for a more favorable setup before committing further. The market is still showing some uncertainty so it's important to stay cautious until the next clear opportunity presents itself. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022231073481261071 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022231073481261071"
X Link 2026-02-13T08:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"The BTC liquidation heatmap provided a solid roadmap for price action over the past [--] hours. Yesterday it accurately predicted the movement as BTC swept the $68.3K$69.2K range and tagged $65K. This confirms the effectiveness of liquidation heatmaps as they give traders insight into key liquidity zones where price tends to gravitate. Liquidity is the key to understanding market dynamics and anticipating price action. These liquidity zones are where price movements become more predictable allowing for better decision-making. Looking at the heatmap data we can see that these movements are not"
X Link 2026-02-13T08:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"It looks like the same macro liquidity dynamics that fueled the massive Bitcoin rally in [--------] are beginning to unfold once again. Back then: Quantitative Tightening (QT) ended. Liquidity returned through Treasury bill purchases. Quantitative Easing (QE) restarted. Now we see similar signs. Since QT ended in [----] and with the Fed resuming T-bill purchases in December [----] over $90 billion has been pumped into the economy. Bitcoin responded massively to these shifts before and we could be witnessing the early stages of another explosive phase for BTC as these liquidity indicators align once"
X Link 2026-02-13T08:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"The Mayer Multiple an important on-chain indicator for Bitcoin is signaling a potential bottom. This metric compares Bitcoin's current price to its 200-day moving average with the following interpretations: 1.0: Bitcoin is below its long-term average and often considered "cheap." = 1.0: The market is relatively balanced. 2.4: The market is overbought and possibly due for a correction. Last week the Mayer Multiple dipped to [----] a level not seen since June [----] which offered a strong buying opportunity. This suggests that the current price is undervalued compared to its long-term average."
X Link 2026-02-13T08:55Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"$BCH 8H: bearish MA expansion (20/60/120). The rebound couldnt reclaim the 20EMA rejected again. Path of least resistance is down to sweep sell-side liquidity at [---] (then 440). Only a clean 8H reclaim & hold above [------] flips this back bullish. #bch"
X Link 2026-02-05T11:15Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"BTC 60000ETH 1800BNB [---] SOL 70"
X Link 2026-02-06T01:10Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"On the 4H chart BTC is doing exactly what a valid rebound should do. After the sharp sell-off price reclaimed the [--] EMA ribbon and more importantly has not lost it again. That tells me short-term cost is being accepted not sold into. In my system as long as BTC holds above the [--] EMA ribbon this move should be treated as a continuation of the rebound not the end of it. The real warning signal would be a clean loss of the [--] ribbon. Until that happens I see this as post-selloff repair with upside follow-through potential. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020695873878155638"
X Link 2026-02-09T03:06Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Bitcoin remains in a consolidation phase within a broader downtrend. Price is still trading below the mid- to long-term cost bands with the [--] and [---] ribbons sloping downward indicating that the overall structure has not been repaired. The sharp sell-off was followed by low-volume consolidation suggesting short-term selling pressure has eased but no decisive demand has stepped in. As long as price fails to reclaim and hold above the [--] EMA ribbon any bounce should be treated as corrective rather than a trend reversal. At this stage the market is digesting within a bearish structure not"
X Link 2026-02-10T16:44Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"BCH has broken back below the [--] EMA ribbon and is now trading under the [--] EMA ribbon again. The short- and mid-term ribbons are realigning into a bearish structure. Within my dual MA system this is a continuation signal not a range pullback. The [--] ribbon represents short-term cost. Failure to hold above it confirms that recent upside was corrective not structural reversal. Meanwhile the downward slope of the [--] ribbon signals that the mid-term trend remains bearish. As long as price stays below the [--] ribbon and no bullish expansion structure forms bias remains to the downside. A valid"
X Link 2026-02-11T15:46Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"$BTC From a monthly timeframe perspective Bitcoin is approaching a major structural support zone. The broader trend remains in a high-level corrective phase but two key long-term support areas stand out below current price. The first major support sits around $59500. This level aligns with the mid-term monthly moving averages and a prior high-volume consolidation area. It also represents a key cost basis zone from the previous expansion leg. If price revisits this region it is likely to trigger a significant reaction and strong two-way order flow. The second and stronger structural support"
X Link 2026-02-12T05:48Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"On February [--] Binance founder CZ announced that he will be hosting a live AMA on Binance Square today at 23:00 (Beijing time) conducted in both Chinese and English. Youll be able to ask him anything directly during the session. If youd like to tune in you can register on Binance using my referral link below: https://bsmkweb.com/joinref=OPENG https://bsmkweb.com/joinref=OPENG"
X Link 2026-02-12T14:57Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"$BCH update. As outlined previously the 8H bearish MA expansion and repeated rejection from the supply zone played out as expected. Price has now continued lower confirming that the consolidation under resistance was distribution not accumulation. This is why structure matters more than opinion. As long as BCH remains below the prior supply zone and fails to reclaim it with strength downside liquidity remains the magnet. Im not interested in calling bottoms here. Im interested in following momentum. Trend first. Narratives later. $BCH 8H: bearish MA expansion (20/60/120). The rebound couldnt"
X Link 2026-02-12T17:04Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"This $ASTER long played out exactly according to plan. The initial thesis was clear: once price reclaimed and held above the 4H [--] EMA around [----] the structure shifted from breakdown to short-term repair. As long as [----] held this move should be treated as a continuation of the rebound not the end of it. From there price expanded upward into the first major resistance cluster near the [--] EMA ribbon. Today we saw a spike into the [----] area right into the predefined resistance zone. I chose to take profit on that push. This wasnt emotional. It was structural. Entry around [----] exit into"
X Link 2026-02-12T17:24Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"From a structure perspective ETH has clearly shifted from support into resistance. The reaction into the 0.50.618 retracement zone was corrective not impulsive. As long as price remains below $2091 the risk of another leg lower remains elevated under the yellow scenario. For me $2091 is the pivot. A clean break and hold above that level would invalidate the immediate bearish continuation thesis and open the door for a stronger recovery. Until then this is still a counter-trend bounce within a broader corrective structure. No confirmation yet only conditions."
X Link 2026-02-13T16:26Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"From a structure standpoint I agree that a local low could be in place. However within my dual EMA framework confirmation only comes with momentum expansion not just a single bounce. On the daily BTC remains in a clear bearish alignment: [--] [--] [---] and all sloping downward. That means any upside needs to reclaim and hold above the 20/60 EMA cluster before I treat it as impulsive rather than corrective. The $66K$67.7K micro support is valid but if we lose that zone with acceptance the probability shifts back toward continuation rather than a completed (B). For now I need to see: A clean break"
X Link 2026-02-14T02:08Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Liquidity drives Bitcoin. That part is not debatable. The correlation between global money supply expansion and BTC trend persistence has been consistent across cycles. When liquidity contracts BTC corrects. When it stabilizes or expands trend continuation follows. That said liquidity stabilizing is not the same as liquidity aggressively expanding. From a structural perspective $60K is a logical macro support. It aligns with prior cycle behavior and sits within a zone where long-term participants typically step in. But one tag of support does not confirm a new impulsive leg. Maturing markets"
X Link 2026-02-14T02:11Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Divergences matter but timing them is where traders get hurt. Yes BTC rolling over while QQQ prints lower highs and SPY squeezes to marginal ATHs is not a healthy intermarket backdrop. Thats late-cycle behavior historically. But divergence alone is not a short signal. In [----] and [----] the actual breakdown came when liquidity tightened and SPY lost structure not when BTC first weakened. Right now SPY is still holding trend. Until that breaks its a warning not a trigger. I respect the signal. I dont front-run it. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022553634215776611"
X Link 2026-02-14T06:08Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"The $2000 reclaim is constructive but its not the real shift yet. From a structural standpoint $2100 is the pivot that matters. That level aligns with prior breakdown supply and short-term trend compression. If ETH can accept above $2100 and hold on a daily closing basis then the path toward $2300$2400 opens up as a technical relief move. Failing to reclaim $2100 however keeps this as a bounce within a broader downtrend. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022620210327597215 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022620210327597215"
X Link 2026-02-14T10:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Spot CVD grinding higher is constructive. It tells me buyers are absorbing supply methodically rather than chasing price. Thats typically how sustainable bases are built. The absence of heavy sell walls reduces immediate overhead pressure. At the same time the persistent $60K bid wall acts as structural support thats where real size is willing to defend. As long as CVD continues to trend up and price holds above the liquidity pocket the path of least resistance shifts from downside continuation to range expansion. Slow accumulation emotional spikes."
X Link 2026-02-14T10:34Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Weekend liquidity ranges are usually positioning zones not resolution zones. I agree the structure is compressing between 64.5k and 71.4k. Thats a clean liquidity map: equal highs above resting liquidity below. For me the key isnt just the sweep its acceptance. If we sweep 71.4k and fail to hold above it on H1/H4 thats a distribution tell and Id lean short back into range. If we reclaim and build value above it then the prior bearish MSB becomes less relevant and upside continuation becomes the higher probability path. Same logic for 64.5k a sweep into that pocket without follow-through is"
X Link 2026-02-14T10:42Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"BTC and ETH diverging from Nasdaq is not random. Crypto and software are the most liquidity-sensitive parts of the risk curve. They tend to front-run tightening conditions and deteriorating liquidity before broader indices react. When liquidity expands they outperform first. When liquidity contracts they break first. Right now that divergence is a message not noise. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023030675956433052 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023030675956433052"
X Link 2026-02-15T13:44Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"🩸 Bitcoin just broke below $68000. Monthly: the biggest support sits around $59.6K (next $55.6K). Until price reclaims & holds $68.7K$70K rallies are just bounces. $59.6K = the line in the sand. Lose it deeper reset. #BTC #Bitcoin BREAKING: $1210000000 WORTH OF LONGS HAS BEEN LIQUIDATED IN THE LAST [--] HOURS. https://t.co/CXSVdaSecc BREAKING: $1210000000 WORTH OF LONGS HAS BEEN LIQUIDATED IN THE LAST [--] HOURS. https://t.co/CXSVdaSecc"
X Link 2026-02-05T15:48Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"BTC just slipped back into the Fire Sale band on the Rainbow Chart. Historically when price spends time in this zone its been the boring accumulation phase before the next explosive expansion not a guarantee but a recurring pattern. My playbook (spot only): laddered DCA + keep dry powder. Invalidation/risk: if BTC fails to hold the lower band and momentum keeps bleeding expect a longer grind before any real trend shift. #BTC #Bitcoin Bitcoin FIRE SALE https://t.co/PHK5ZBgE3B Bitcoin FIRE SALE https://t.co/PHK5ZBgE3B"
X Link 2026-02-07T13:58Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Structurally this BTC decline looks more like a controlled trend pullback than a panic-driven collapse. Price has now reacted to the [--] EMA (green ribbon) which is typically the first area where short-term cost support shows up. If this rebound continues the next logical area of interaction is the [--] EMA and the [---] EMA (red ribbon) representing mid- to long-term market cost. This isnt a prediction its simply how price behaves after a large deviation: reverting toward higher-timeframe averages. Whether this develops into a real trend shift will depend on how price behaves around the [--] / 120"
X Link 2026-02-08T14:58Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"ASTER has rebounded and is now holding above the 4H [--] EMA ribbon around [----] signaling short-term structural repair. As long as price does not lose [----] and get accepted back below it this move should be treated as a continuation of the rebound rather than the end of it. Under that condition the upside levels to watch are: [----] near the blue [--] EMA ribbon [----] near the red higher-timeframe ribbon The key level remains [----]. Holding above it favors the bullish scenario while a loss would invalidate the current structure and require reassessment"
X Link 2026-02-10T17:09Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Im currently holding a long position in ASTER. On the daily timeframe price has reclaimed short-term structure and is attempting to repair the previous downtrend. However major resistance levels are clearly overhead. The first key resistance sits around [----] this aligns with the [--] EMA ribbon and mid-term structural pressure. A strong breakout and hold above this level would signal further strength. The second major resistance is near [----] a higher timeframe supply zone and a critical level for a broader trend reversal. Game plan is simple: Watch [----] for either strong breakout confirmation"
X Link 2026-02-11T16:06Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"My view is clear: on the 8H timeframe $Tesla remains structurally bearish and the trend has not repaired. Using my dual EMA system the structure is in a classic bearish alignment. The [--] EMA ribbon is trading below the [--] ribbon and the [--] ribbon is below the [---] ribbon. All three are stacked downward with negative slope indicating trend continuation rather than consolidation. Price has failed to reclaim and hold above the [--] EMA ribbon. Each bounce into the ribbon has been rejected signaling weak upside momentum. This suggests corrective bounces within a downtrend not reversal strength."
X Link 2026-02-13T05:54Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Im aligned with the idea of one more push higher before continuation lower but only if structure supports it. The 68k flip is constructive on H1. As long as price holds above and builds acceptance there the path of least resistance is toward the 72.2k premium high. Above that the 73k74k liquidity pocket is obvious. If we trade into that zone Id expect it to be a liquidity event first breakout second. The real question is reaction not destination. If we see displacement into 7374k and immediate failure back below 72k thats distribution and Id look for a rotation back into range lows. If we"
X Link 2026-02-14T10:44Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Good point. The ETH treasury cohort is basically a reflexive bid if they cant bounce it tells you risk appetite + financing conditions are still tight. Two things Im watching: Any stabilization / higher lows in these names (equity bid returning). Evidence of ETH reclaiming key MAs on HTF (20/60 ribbon + slope shift). If the stocks keep bleeding forced selling risk is real: margin calls debt covenants redemptions or simply de-risking into weak liquidity. Until that changes any ETH pop is more likely a relief rally than a regime flip. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023033104454324628"
X Link 2026-02-15T13:54Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"If we close and hold below the lower band (and any bounce fails to reclaim it) I treat it as risk-off odds shift to a deeper mean reversion (80k first then 74k). If we snap back inside the channel quickly and hold thats a classic bear trap rebound can extend back toward 90k/96k. Until the channel is reclaimed rallies are counter-trend. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017514658270515527 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017514658270515527"
X Link 2026-01-31T08:25Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Liquidation maps dont predict they show where the pain is. With price 83.5k the stack of short liquidations above (8688k then 9192k then 94k) is a real magnet if we reclaim and hold 84.685k. But it cuts both ways: lose 82.5k and especially 8081k and the market can easily hunt the long-liq pocket below first. Im fine holding longs as long as 8081k holds. No reclaim = dont expect a clean ride. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017524528453411047 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017524528453411047"
X Link 2026-01-31T09:05Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"ETH is still heavy agreed. But liquidation cascade only happens if we get daily acceptance below $2.482.50k (break + failed reclaim). That level is also a major demand/liquidity shelf so a sweep + snapback is very possible. Reclaim $2.652.70k first to stabilize. Until then bounces are just sellable relief. Next downside shelves: $2.35k then $2.25k. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017529599668982269 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017529599668982269"
X Link 2026-01-31T09:25Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Thin weekend tape. Im watching the CME gap: Friday close 84.27k vs reopen 84.9k. If we fill & reclaim 84.385k Ill respect a squeeze into 8688k. If we reject that area and drift back under 83k its still distribution and February starts with bulls defending 8182k. Lose 81k and 80k gets tested fast regardless of the Gold/Silver noise. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017592476933222642 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017592476933222642"
X Link 2026-01-31T13:35Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Key line is still $86.8k (your danger zone). As long as weekly is below it bounces are just retests $81.5k $78.4k $74k stays the clean path. The only way this roadmap breaks: a weekly reclaim + hold above $86.8k (better if it reclaims $8890k). Until that happens I treat every pop as sell-the-rip not bottom confirmed. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017626584950444487 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017626584950444487"
X Link 2026-01-31T15:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Obvious lows get traded because liquidity sits there. My pivot is $74.45k: a sweep + reclaim of $7880k can finish the wave-5 without printing 70s. Fail to reclaim $7880k / weekly close $74.45k $70.8k becomes the magnet then $66.8k if it keeps bleeding. Invalidation: weekly back above $82k+. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017627864129327258 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017627864129327258"
X Link 2026-01-31T15:55Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"BTC Rainbow Chart just tagged the Buy / Accumulation band again. Thats not a promise of an instant bottom its a macro risk/reward shift: fear is high value is high. My play: scale spot in tranches add only on weekly structure reclaim and stay disciplined invalidation = sustained weekly closes below the lowest band. Patience prediction. #BTC #Bitcoin https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017818172620247335 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017818172620247335"
X Link 2026-02-01T04:31Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Agree nasty monthly close but the only line that matters is the [----] ATH shelf ($6972k). Hold it on monthly closes = re-accumulation range. Lose it = structure changes. Support: $70k then $60k Resistance: $100k$105k then ATH Trigger: weekly reclaim + hold above $100k with higher lows I add Invalidation: [--] monthly closes $70k I step aside / hedge Big bases can launch but only after they punish the impatient. #BTC https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017845058356318416 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017845058356318416"
X Link 2026-02-01T06:18Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Monthly close was ugly but Im not marrying a bear thesis here. Pivot: $90.8k below it rallies are sells. Above it (daily/weekly reclaim + hold) bias flips back to long. Downside magnets: $7576k weak lows first then the real decision zone $6972k (prior ATH shelf). If $6972k fails on monthly closes: next POI is $6065k (thats where Id actually look to size spot). Invalidation for shorts: sustained acceptance above $90.8k. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017845710415401251 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017845710415401251"
X Link 2026-02-01T06:21Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"$BTC is sitting in the 73.7k76.5k support band. Support alone isnt a buy signal acceptance + reclaim is. Key levels: 76.5k / 73.7k Trigger to get bullish: reclaim 78.8k80k and hold a retest (4H/1D structure shift) Invalidation: daily close 73.7k I stop trying to catch it (next magnet 6972k) Tactics: aggressive = small spot scale-in here; conservative = wait for reclaim + retest Let price prove strength before you call bottom. #BTC https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017847058917716464 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017847058917716464"
X Link 2026-02-01T06:26Z [---] followers, [----] engagements

"$ETH tagged $2250 nailed the zone. Now its a decision area not an auto-buy. Bull trigger: reclaim $2.35k then daily close back above $2.5k + hold the retest Buyable wick setup: sweep $2.2k quick reclaim $2.25k Invalidation: daily close $2.2k (next support $2.052.1k) Upside targets if confirmed: $2.6k then $2.853.0k Big money doesnt buy support it buys confirmation. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017847931483967805 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017847931483967805"
X Link 2026-02-01T06:30Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Gaussian Channel exit is a regime break until BTC gets back inside downside is the default. Resistance / reclaim: lower band + prior breakdown level $88k$90k (weekly close back in = bearish thesis weakens) Support: $76k then $6972k Trigger: reclaim + hold $8890k I stop shorting bounces / start looking for longs Invalidation for bears: sustained acceptance back inside the channel Channels dont predict bottoms they tell you when the trend is broken. #BTC https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017848542157803919 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017848542157803919"
X Link 2026-02-01T06:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@cryptorover For BTC $7075k is the bull-case demand. Hold + reclaim $7880k bounce window opens ($85k $9095k). Weekly close $70k = bounce thesis invalid (market goes hunting the next liquidity pocket)"
X Link 2026-02-01T11:25Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Monthly closed below the prior higher low ($82k) and under the post-2022 trendline thats a structural loss not noise. Bull path: reclaim $82k$85k (S1) on a monthly close then hold it on retest opens $90k$95k. Bear/base path: fail to reclaim S1 more time rotating lower into S2 $72k. Invalidation for bulls: monthly close $72k next magnet is S3 (low-$60ks). https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017922654033092740 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017922654033092740"
X Link 2026-02-01T11:27Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Bottoms arent a single candle theyre a transfer. STHs are deep underwater again (capitulation zone) which often sparks a bounce but the real bottom usually needs time + a higher low. Levels: 7476k is the base. Reclaim 81k (8H/D close) Ill treat it as bottoming. Accept below 74k the process resets lower. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017983895627829614 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017983895627829614"
X Link 2026-02-01T15:30Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"$85k is the pivot agreed but its not [--] months guaranteed its until proven otherwise. Below $85k: every bounce into 8486k is supply / sell-the-rally behavior. Bull trigger: 8H/D acceptance above $85k + hold it on the retest next magnet 9295k. Bear trigger: rejection at $85k + lose 7674k base opens 7072k. Bottoms are a process: first you see capitulation then you see re-acceptance. $85k is that re-acceptance line. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017984743120449855 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017984743120449855"
X Link 2026-02-01T15:33Z [---] followers, [----] engagements

"$75k is a liquidity magnet not a floor. If we tag 7574k and see OI/funding spike but no 8H/D reclaim expect a bleed to 7270k (and potentially 66k). $60k is not base-case unless we get weekly acceptance 70k + spot demand stays absent. Bull case is simple: sweep 74/75 reclaim [------] hold [--] = rotation attempt back into 85k supply. Trade the reclaim not the obvious line. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017986257717248471 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017986257717248471"
X Link 2026-02-01T15:39Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"$2250 hit = major leg completed not an automatic durable low. For me bulls only earn bottoming once we see 8H/D reclaim [----] then follow-through into [--------] with a higher low above [----]. That would look more impulsive. If the bounce stays choppy and fails under [--------] I treat it as a B-wave / relief rally. Invalidation: 8H/D acceptance [----] opens [----] then [----]. January highs remain the next big test but structure first. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017986576245256515 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017986576245256515"
X Link 2026-02-01T15:41Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"$74k is the crowds line in the sand which is exactly why its vulnerable to a liquidity sweep. I care less about wicks and more about weekly acceptance. Bullish: sweep $74k weekly close back above $7476k + reclaim $81k base building rotation toward $85k supply. Bearish: weekly close $74k + failed retest lower low confirmed next magnet is the 200W MA zone (mid/high-$50ks on most charts). Trade the reclaim/acceptance not the slogan. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017987199481078066 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017987199481078066"
X Link 2026-02-01T15:43Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"ETH is still stuck in the $2300$2400 trap looks more like distribution than a clean reversal. Resistance: $2400 (must reclaim) then $2620$2700 Support: $2250$2190 then $2050$1970 Trigger: 8H/D close above $2400 + hold $2350 on retest bounce attempt is real. Invalidation: 8H/D acceptance below $2190 odds shift to a bleed toward $2050/$1970. Until $2400 flips rallies are sellable. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018618974016327802 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018618974016327802"
X Link 2026-02-03T09:34Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"That 74k sweep was the real liquidity grab so yes a local low can be in. But Im still treating this as a bounce-to-POC not a trend flip. Expect: mean reversion into 79.581k (local PoC zone) Confirmation: 8H/D acceptance above 8081k + hold the retest Upside extensions: 83k then the real sell wall at 85k Invalidation: 8H/D acceptance back below 74k next liquidity 7072k Sweep is step [--]. Reclaim + higher low is step [--]. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018921527031587086 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018921527031587086"
X Link 2026-02-04T05:36Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Yep thats the Type [--] breakout profile: no pullback to the boundary straight expansion and you only recognize it once its already deep into the measured move. How I manage it: Once price reaches 8085% of the target I stop waiting for a retest and switch to trail-only. Trail behind the last higher-low (or a short MA like 20EMA) and only exit on a daily close below that level. If it does pull back I want it to hold the breakout level on the first retest otherwise its turning into a Type 2/failed extension. In this $PPC example: breakout held [-----] target 15.7; once it cleared 15.5+ trailing is"
X Link 2026-02-04T05:38Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Exactly a true Type [--] breakout isnt just hit the target its how it gets there: no boundary retest no meaningful pullback straight expansion. Thats usually the market telling you demand is stronger than the measured move model. How I trade these: When price reaches 8085% of the objective I stop hoping for a dip and switch to trail mode. Let it run past the objective but trail under the last higher-low / prior day low / 20EMA. Only get defensive if you see the first impulsive rejection + close back below the breakout level (thats when Type [--] turns into exhaustion). In this chart: breakout"
X Link 2026-02-04T05:41Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Fair framework. Im with you on the base case: HTF support is the only place bulls can defend. But Id phrase it like this: it holds only if we get weekly acceptance back above the zone not just a wick. Base case (bull defend): sweep weekly close back above 7476k grind up into 8081k then test 85k supply. Bear case #1: weekly close 74k + failed retest = bear flag / continuation 62k is a clean magnet. Bear case #2: extended distribution / rising wedge resolution 57k (200W MA area) is plausible on a log basis. I agree: sub-50k is mostly narrative unless we see a macro shock + sustained weekly"
X Link 2026-02-04T06:05Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Liquidity sandwich makes sense: sweep below the lows then reclaim the range low = bounce environment not a trend flip. Magnets: 8081k first then 8486k (heavy sell liquidity). Trigger: 8H/D acceptance above 81k and only a real regime change if we hold above 85k. Invalidation: 8H/D acceptance back 74.475k the low is in thesis fails next is 7072k. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018929980231897187 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018929980231897187"
X Link 2026-02-04T06:09Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"This isnt mystical dumping its what thin books + market sells look like. When spot liquidity is shallow a few things happen fast: CVD bleeds across venues because market orders have to walk the book. It feels like forced selling but often its simply no bids sitting there. Without big resting clusters price doesnt bounce it slides. What I watch for a turn: Sell pressure slows (CVD stops making new lows) Absorption (price holds while CVD keeps selling) Liquidity returns (real bid stacks appear) Until then every bounce is just a liquidity reset not a bottom"
X Link 2026-02-06T01:59Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"Since Jan [--] total market cap fell from $2.97T $2.25T: thats $720B erased in [--] weeks ( $20B/day) as selling pressure stays relentless. Zoom out from the Jan [--] peak and the drawdown is $1T roughly $44B/day on average (per Finbolds math). This isnt noise. Its deleveraging + liquidity exiting. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019778902248595654 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019778902248595654"
X Link 2026-02-06T14:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"63K is a legit reaction zone but calling [--] months of bottom is premature without one thing: structure reclaim. Heres my line: Bullish only if BTC reclaims $68.7K$70K and then $7374K (weekly hold). Thats what turns a wick into a range. If we fail those reclaims 63K is just a pause inside a downtrend. Invalidation: a weekly close below 63K + failed reclaim next magnets are $59.6K (monthly line) then $5556K. Im open to farming a range but Ill only size up after the reclaim not before. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019779402398314767 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019779402398314767"
X Link 2026-02-06T14:25Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing