[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@oomahq Avatar @oomahq Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻

Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻 posts on X about bitcoin, money, devs, influencer the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #

Social category influence cryptocurrencies XXXX% finance XXXX%

Social topic influence bitcoin 11.25%, money 3.75%, devs #520, influencer 1.25%, should be 1.25%, satoshi 1.25%, all the 1.25%, $ordi 1.25%, decentralized 1.25%, for your XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @adam3us @giacomozucco @coinjoined @davidsfreeman @start9labs @matthill @stephanlivera @soloyopee @mrhodl @cipherhoodlum @cguida6 @bitcoinbombadil @csuwildcat @notgrubles @zndtoshi @wyatt_earp @_davidsfreeman @caminadrummer4 @ndeet @jabravo

Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) ORDI (ORDI)

Top Social Posts #

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"@lopp @mattkratter Shouldn't this information appear on your VC landing page Or was that disclosure made somewhere else"
X Link @oomahq 2025-08-20T21:52Z 2107 followers, 11.3K engagements

"@NickSzabo4 @socrates1024 @iang_fc @zooko @oleganza I imagine you probably would like to know that Graeber's views on money have become pretty popular as of late among the Bitcoin influencer class"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-22T00:08Z 2107 followers, XXX engagements

"Remember the arbitrariness of the Samourai and Tornado Cash devs prosecutions. If you feel 100000% sure that Bitcoin Core sanctioning large chunks of arbitrary data embedding as an officially supported use case of the Bitcoin network won't have any consequences you're full of shit. And CSAM in node runners hard drives is not even the worse threat: it's the increased likelihood that Stratum v1 pools will start actively moderating the contents of the txs received from the P2P network. This would very likely be the prelude of a XX% attack that nails the coffin of Bitcoin's true censorship"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-01T21:45Z 2107 followers, 22.7K engagements

"@privateimtiaz Arrowslits are cool. Very citadel-like"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-21T22:38Z 2107 followers, XX engagements

"You probably haven't seen that the conclusion of the researchers who already investigated onchain arbitrary data years ago is that blockchains should fight CSAM tooth and nail using any and all tools at our disposal. Full paper (2018):"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-21T23:06Z 2107 followers, 4168 engagements

"@OperationBiggie @mattkratter @adam3us @bstrco It should be obvious by now that Satoshi was the friends we made along the way"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-22T00:48Z 2107 followers, XXX engagements

"@btcblockjams This is precisely the path that Core v30 has set us on"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-22T00:57Z 2107 followers, XX engagements

"If you only learn one thing about the OP_RETURN drama make it this: The biggest threat to Bitcoin's censorship resistance is that the biggest pools stop mining on top of blocks found by anyone and start mining only on top of blocks found by a small cartel of pools. Another name for this scenario is XX% attack. Independent solo mining would not be possible anymore and you'd need to join the cartel and pass KYC to mine. If that happens your txs will only get mined if they enter Foundry's or AntPool's mempool. States will lean on this chokepoint to apply blacklists first on their mempools then"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-08T20:58Z 2099 followers, 26.7K engagements

"@ndgo1370 Many people don't seem to understand (or pretend to not understand) that of all the infinite ways to embed data onchain OP_RETURN is the only one that is unambiguous and specifically created for this purpose"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-15T13:16Z 2103 followers, 6087 engagements

"Again I was repeatedly assured this was already possible way before "the OP_RETURN upgrade" as spammers are calling Core v30"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-16T15:40Z 2080 followers, 5430 engagements

"@bergealex4 Since Bitcoin became a cheap file server I can transact at sub X s/vB whenever I want. No one who still uses bitcoin as money needs any scaling solution but go ahead waste your time"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-19T11:10Z 2039 followers, 2963 engagements

"@NickSzabo4 @adam3us @bar_dictum @satflation @zamir591582 @jabulanijakes @BitMEXResearch Adam was blissfully unaware until yesterday that Marathon does active content moderation of the txs they accept out of band with Slipstream"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-19T13:12Z 2097 followers, 24.2K engagements

"1. If pools accept your shares and pays you a few sats you're making a difference otherwise they would kick you. X. Node runners should know what they want to do with their node and configure it appropriately. Mining node for DATUM Make it a listening node have a big extra mempool and prune it if you like. Want to run an electrum server on top for your own wallet Then don't prune and turn on txindex listening is optional you don't care about CBR etc. And so on"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-19T20:48Z 2103 followers, XX engagements

"@notgrubles @MiyamotoClan Not true Slipstream and similar services are moderated. The P2P relay network isn't"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-19T22:52Z 2042 followers, XX engagements

"The groundwork actually started in 2022 a year before the first waves of spam. The readme of the project was rewritten from "Bitcoin is an experimental digital currency that enables instant payments to anyone anywhere in the world. ." to "Bitcoin Core is a full node implementation for the Bitcoin P2P network""
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-19T23:21Z 2098 followers, 2488 engagements

"@calibrated_lies @satflation Read next tweet. X weeks later Marco Falke included the changes in another PR that went through"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-20T07:45Z 2056 followers, XXX engagements

"@cguida6 Relax I was told it's a bugfix"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-21T16:26Z 2106 followers, 1384 engagements

"@MajorianBTC And people do for the record:"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-21T19:13Z 2106 followers, XX engagements

"@giacomozucco @notgrubles States don't tend to act deterministically. Look at Samourai they weren't transmitting third party money in any way shape or capacity. That didn't stop the USG from prosecuting them on these grounds and beating them into submission once they were kidnapped"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-21T19:52Z 2105 followers, XXX engagements

"@BitcoinBombadil @giacomozucco @notgrubles Yes IIRC they bragged about "welcoming Russian oligarchs to Whirlpool" or something like that"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-21T20:15Z 2106 followers, XXX engagements

"@B__T__C As much as I'm tempted to shit on Core v28.3 didn't uncap the op_return limit. It did lower the default minrelaytxfee to XXX s/vB though and they argued it is a bugfix. Therefore it's expected that they will backport the op_return change too eventually"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-21T22:55Z 2107 followers, XXX engagements

"Other juicy bits. At the time (2018 X years before the inscription spam attack) they only managed to retrieve 1600 files from the Bitcoin blockchain"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-21T23:14Z 2107 followers, XXX engagements

"Admittedly this would have barely registered even to me if it wasn't for everything else that happened later. But everything else did happen so this stands out. Would be awesome if laanwj chimed in and remembered why he thought the change was such a bad idea but changed his mind X weeks later. Shame he didn't explain why in his ACK of the second PR"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-22T07:47Z 2094 followers, XXX engagements

"@zndtoshi @GrassFedBitcoin Yes both the current mining landscape and development landscape are very centralized so the network depends on them not acting retarded. The tools to solve mining centralization already exist at least (DATUM)"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-22T09:12Z 2098 followers, XX engagements

"@zndtoshi @GrassFedBitcoin I think Bitcoin as we know it won't survive the current mining and development centralization and that Luke made a good call developing DATUM last year and maintaining Knots since 2011"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-22T09:21Z 2098 followers, XX engagements

"@zndtoshi @GrassFedBitcoin Too bad we aren't shitcoiners and we're not going anywhere. You're stuck with us trying to fix this stupid thing"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-22T09:29Z 2098 followers, XX engagements

"@john_giovanni_ @mcgooberty20764 @adam3us Lol. I'm also "afraid" that Luke will quit if Core devs continue ostracizing him and tards in general continue being mean to him but such is the nature of the real world"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-22T09:52Z 2098 followers, XX engagements

"@john_giovanni_ @mcgooberty20764 @adam3us @adam3us if Bitcoin's success requires that everyone treats developers in a certain way I'm sure you can see it will never work"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-22T09:56Z 2098 followers, XX engagements

"@kretchino I don't think many people use Bitcoin Core's integrated wallet. It could almost be removed"
X Link @oomahq 2025-10-22T21:23Z 2105 followers, XX engagements