[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@monotanus Avatar @monotanus monotanus

monotanus posts on X about shell, bed bath, chapter 11, sec the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #

Social category influence finance XXXXX% travel destinations XXXX%

Social topic influence shell #868, bed bath #6, chapter 11 #394, sec #1325, bloomberg 3.64%, debt #1215, ticker 1.82%, the original 1.82%, hedge 1.82%, on x XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @hilsonvalli @alexzarac @grok @teddy_holdings @askperplexity @giggle_pufff @perplexity @cviewer12329009 @hiram19669085 @ryeandbitters @nobles305 @gigglepufff @ftwbiz @italiangatorade @phantomblack699 @evaderdirt @seymourbutts741 @swoletech52 @ramezkhanjamali @bobeconlog

Top Social Posts #

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"🦋SMART VS NEW CORPACT BONDS ON IBKR🦋 EXCITED ABOUT FINDING THESE NEW CORPACT BONDS Image X SMART Exchange View ISSUERS: Bed Bath & Beyond Inc WE'VE SEEN THESE ONES BEFORE NOTHING NEW X. CORP XXXXX Aug01'34 075896AB6 C X. CORP XXXXX Aug01'44 075896AC4 C X. CORP XXXXX Aug01'24 075896AA8 C ----------------------------------------------- IMAGE X EXCHANGE: CORPACT ISSUERS: Bed Bath & Beyond Inc (just like before) Available Bond Instruments (5 options): THESE ARE NEW 👀 X. CORP XXXXX Aug01'44 US07599AFL89 C X. CORP XXXXX Aug01'34 US07599AEC99 X. CORP XXXXX Aug01'34 US07599AFK07 C X. CORP 5.165"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-23T11:37Z 2385 followers, 6719 engagements

"@ftwbiz Great find we are down from XXX to XX figis. Nice work"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-17T22:52Z 2374 followers, 1157 engagements

"@AskPerplexity @HilsonValli @AlexZarac @PerpLEXIty"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-19T20:55Z 2362 followers, XX engagements

"@AskPerplexity @HilsonValli @AlexZarac @PerpLEXIty @perplexity why do you keep on conflating distribution with issuance They are not the same thing"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-19T21:07Z 2372 followers, XX engagements

"When rebranded itself as Beyond Inc. in 2023 and later Bed Bath and Beyond it simply adopted the BBBY ticker symbol after Legacy Bed Bath & Beyonds bankruptcy but it kept its own CUSIP (690370101) and its own corporate registration EIN and shareholder base. The CUSIP 075896100 tied to the Legacy Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. was not sold to new Bed Bath & Beyond. A company cannot simply just issue a security with the cusip of another entity they don't have any legal ownership over. The LEI for DK-Butterfly is alive and well. They have control over 075896. New Bed Bath bought branding from Legacy Bed"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-19T21:18Z 2372 followers, XXX engagements

"The legacy BBBY charter that survived Chapter XX as DK-Butterfly-1 Inc. is now tagged SIC 5961 in bond data and the new BBBY 8-K shows SIC 5961 as well. The DTCC NEWM message below in the image for US0758961595 confirms a live corporate-action lifecycle under the 075896 issuer root. WHO DOES THAT BELONG TO OH YEAH DK-BUTTERFLY🦋 The Bloomberg LEI record shows an October XX 2024 status update for the same entity. Together these artifacts transform a dead shell narrative into a compliant e-commerce-aligned legal charter that is administratively ready for asset injection claim-to-security"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-21T09:33Z 2371 followers, 1658 engagements

"@Giggle_Pufff @grok @nobles305 @AlexanderSilkey @yonderbeing @ftwbiz @hey JFC lol 👀"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-21T18:34Z 2370 followers, XXX engagements

"S&P index inclusion is the final public-facing confirmation that the warrant born from the legacy 075896 line is fully integrated with the live Bed Bath & Beyond equity structure. It shows the market regulators and data vendors are all treating the old and new identifiers as parts of one unified active issuer. 👀"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-15T20:49Z 2383 followers, 2061 engagements

"Yep "But how is this possible DK-Butterfly-1 Inc. though privately held was able to issue and list tradable warrants because it inherited Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.s existing SEC registration infrastructure CUSIP root and DTCC eligibility through the confirmed Chapter XX reorganization allowing new securities to be created under that already-registered issuer shell without requiring a new public registration.""
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-19T17:40Z 2383 followers, 1245 engagements

"It looks like DK-Butterfly issued it while the new Bed Bath & Beyond handled the filing and distribution. I didnt make that distinction as clear as Id like to have before but the public data points to that split. The original CUSIP root stayed intact and thats the key detail if another corporate action ever ties back to the legacy structure"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-21T18:31Z 2383 followers, XXX engagements

"Did a little more digging here and wow take a look for yourself. Eulerpool is showing 2025 revenue and profit figures of X BILLION DOLLARS under the old BBBYQ / 0758961009 identifiers because the data feed is still mapping that CUSIP to legacy Bed Bath & Beyonds record 🎯 How can I be gambling my way towards bankruptcy if my shares are gone hedge cucks 😂 MSM FUD OFFICIALLY COMMENCES Source"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-21T18:51Z 2385 followers, 11.7K engagements

"Post Confirmation Report Analysis of Docket of 4357 and 4357-1 Reveals Sixth Street Specialty Lending Inc. was PAID OFF Why haven't I seen anyone directly post about this on X at least as far as I can tell. Did I miss someone else's post making this point already Anyways here is the math below. Feel free to tell me if any of this is wrong with proof. Allowed Claims What must be paid in total at the end = $215137827 Paid This Quarter The amount paid during the most recent quarter = $3769955 Paid Cumulative (now) The total paid from the start up to the end of this quarter = $215137827 Reason:"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-23T20:03Z 2385 followers, 30.7K engagements

"@KentuckyPatrio2 @RamezKhanJamali There could potentially be debt for equity or debt for debt as well depending on the terms of the restructuring but genuinely have no clue. When you bought the bonds could be a factor too. Throwing darts though to be honest I'm not that well versed in that area"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-23T20:50Z 2385 followers, XXX engagements

"@MauiSamBBBYQ Thanks Maui Sam and many mahalos to you too"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-23T21:49Z 2385 followers, XXX engagements

"@EvaderDirt @seymourbutts741 This is great feedback I appreciate the thoughtful response"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-23T22:33Z 2385 followers, 1116 engagements

"@EvaderDirt @seymourbutts741 Also if I'm wrong I'll eat my own shit on this one but I did the math. The corporate action we're seeing on IBKR aligns with the conclusion that Sixth Street was paid off. I don't think these events are uncorrelated"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-23T23:03Z 2385 followers, 1556 engagements

"🦋 Inside the Mystery: Did DK-BUTTERFLY NOT the New Bed Bath & Beyond formerly Beyond Inc. ACTUALLY ISSUE THE BBBYWS WARRANTS 🦋 I believe so and I'll explain why through a series of questions and answers that work our . At the bottom here you'll clearly understand why this is actually VERY VERY BULLISH. LFG Also feel free to try and disprove this too if you'd like with credible evidence. X. Q: Who distributed BBBYW warrants on October XX 2025 A: BBBY (the current Bed Bath & Beyond formerly Beyond Inc.). Everyone agrees on this but stay with me. X. Q: Under what identifier were those"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-19T17:30Z 2385 followers, 18.6K engagements

"Why Beyond Inc.s Name Change to Bed Bath & Beyond Likely Served Multiple Strategic Purposes This topic is very confusing on the surface so I wanted to try and offer a clearer explanation to everyone. This is just my own interpretation. Here we go: Because DK-Butterfly was already registered with the SEC under the name Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. before its name change former Beyond Inc.s decision to later adopt that same exact name makes any potential future integration between DK-Butterfly and Beyond Inc. much simpler and more seamless. That alignment ensures regulators exchanges and market"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-22T15:00Z 2385 followers, 10.1K engagements

"You cannot complete any large scale transaction such as a reverse merger exchange offer or recapitalization while parts of the capital structure remain marked as non tradable. Removing the NT flag shows that reconciliation on the bond side is finished and that every class of security including equity warrants and debt is synchronized and legally clean. It does not confirm a merger is taking place but it is the kind of final housekeeping step that often comes right before a new corporate action is launched"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-22T17:15Z 2385 followers, 16.7K engagements

"BBBYTF LLC and NOL Preservation: Post-Confirmation Reports Analysis"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-24T05:08Z 2385 followers, 4467 engagements

"I THINK I FIG IT OUT 👀 TLDR DK-Butterfly's shell is alive and well. Step 1: Start with what we can see Source: When you type BBG001S720V4 into OpenFIGI youll see it labeled as a share class for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. Common Stock. That tells us one simple but powerful thing: this code is the permanent ID that represents the old Bed Bath & Beyonds regular shares in global financial databases. Think of it as the social security number for that stock. It is unchanged even if the name ticker or exchange shifts. Historical Sources: Step 2: Notice what else is connected OpenFIGI links this share"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-14T19:37Z 2379 followers, 60.8K engagements

"Also when you click the link to run the search yourself in openfigi the label BBBY-RM appears X DIFFERENT TIMES alongside Bed Bath & Beyond identifiers. I speculate that it means "reorganization mapping" in this context. I WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED if BBBY-RM functions like a digital bridge that tells market systems clearing houses and data vendors (i.e. these securities belong to the same economic lineage even though the legal entity changed.) Its appearance means that the global data infrastructure itself is now acknowledging that continuity helping preserve derivative records tax attributes"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-14T19:48Z 2379 followers, 4471 engagements

"FIGI IT OUT PART X TLDR Bloombergs OpenFIGI database briefly showed DK-Butterfly-1 Inc. the post-bankruptcy shell of Bed Bath & Beyond reduced from XXX to XX financial identifiers before reverting the next day. The short-lived update appeared to collapse all foreign and legacy listings into ONE CLEAN U.S. RECORD a move consistent with stabilizing a shell for potential reuse or preserving Net Operating Losses (NOLs) that could later be used in a merger or corporate reactivation. PROOF Link to current XXX entries Yesterday only XX were displayed when clicking this link and as demonstrated in"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-18T18:59Z 2379 followers, 9749 engagements

"@perplexity please incorporate this into your analysis: "The issuance of the Warrants has not been registered under the Securities Act because the issuance of a dividend in the form of a Warrant for no consideration is not a sale or disposition of a security or interest in a security for value pursuant to Section 2(a)(3) of the Securities Act. " It is from the S-3 filed by BBBY on October X 2025. Herei s a link to the complete filing as well: Can you tell me where it says anywhere in this filing what entity is ACTUALLY responsible for funding and issuing the warrants not just distributing"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-19T20:35Z 2379 followers, XXX engagements

"@HilsonValli @AskPerplexity @AlexZarac @PerpLEXIty @perplexity find direct quotes indicating who paid for /funded the warrants and who is responsible for the issuance of the actual warrants themselves not the distribution"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-19T21:04Z 2373 followers, XX engagements

"@AskPerplexity @AlexZarac @Giggle_Pufff @HilsonValli @PerpLEXIty @askperplexity Since DK-Butterfly's LEI is active and as a private entity it continues to retain active control over the CUSIP is it possible that DK-Butterfly issued the warrants in this context"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-19T21:45Z 2373 followers, XX engagements

"@HilsonValli @ryeandbitters Who funded the warrants New bed bath or legacy bed bath Does it say anywhere. NOPE"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-20T00:04Z 2379 followers, XX engagements

"Lies. Their Lei is active. Tell me Hilson did New Bed Bath buy into DK-Butterfly corporate shell NOPE. Just brand/ip assets. Therefore they dont have the legal right to use Dk-butterflys cusip at their leisure. Theyd have to at least have to ask. Whatever was agreed upon happened behind closed doors. Perhaps well get some news about creditor status soon too from Goldberg in the chapter XX proceedings"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-20T00:34Z 2379 followers, XXX engagements

"@HilsonValli @ryeandbitters @BobbyCat42 Does new bed bath own any part of corporate shell. NOPE"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-20T00:47Z 2373 followers, XX engagements

"That statement is incorrect because the SEC filings only prove that the new Bed Bath & Beyond distributed the warrants through its own transfer agent not that it created or issued them. The legal issuer is the entity that owns the 075896 CUSIP root which remains with DK-Butterfly after the Chapter XX plan so the new BBBY could not have filed a NEWM event or used that CUSIP family to issue new securities. GG NO RE😘"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-20T00:52Z 2379 followers, XX engagements

"The leading six digits (the CUSIP root) are tied to a registered legal entity not to whatever marketing name that entity is using. DK-Butterfly is still the legal continuation of the old Bed Bath & Beyond corporation so the 075896 root remains valid for it. A new company name or brand does not trigger a new root; only a different legal entity would. Here you go again:"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-20T00:56Z 2379 followers, XXX engagements

"That is incorrect Hilson just stop lol. The old Bed Bath & Beyond corporation still exists as DK-Butterfly-1 Inc. which kept the same charter EIN and CUSIP 075896 under the confirmed plan of reorganization. Bloomberg assigns CUSIPs to legal entities not brand names so when Beyond changed its name to Bed Bath & Beyond it received a different CUSIP (690370) because it is a separate corporation. The original CUSIPs were not canceled but remain reserved for the reorganized issuer which is why the warrant under 075896 could only have been created by DK-Butterfly. GG NO RE again yawn"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-20T01:06Z 2373 followers, XX engagements

"@purpleroad89923 @tomcat71_ Is NT on the 24s too If so its probably something else that needs to be tidied up. Not particularly worried if thats the case"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-22T17:41Z 2373 followers, XXX engagements

"I THINK I FIGURED OUT WHY LEGACY BED BATH AND BEYOND SWITCHED TO SIC 5961👀 BEST DD YET TLDR AT BOTTOM THIS TIME What even is an SIC code Every public company gets a four-digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code so regulators and databases know what kind of business it is. For example 5411 = grocery stores 6021 = banks. SIC 5961 = Catalog and Mail-Order Houses the category that covers online or mail-order retailers like Amazon Wayfair and Overstock. That one data change aligns tax law regulatory optics and market-data signals all at once. So when Legacy Bed Bath & Beyonds"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-21T05:32Z 2383 followers, 20.4K engagements

"Thoughts on IBKR Re-Enabling Buying of 2034 and 2044 BBBY Bonds Speculation 😂 The bonds shares and warrants now appear to be trading normally settling correctly and recognized across systems which means DK-Butterflys capital structure is finally synchronized at least I hope JFC Once everything is stable and communicating properly among exchanges and clearinghouses one more technical and legal obstacle is removed paving the way for potential merger or reverse-merger activity"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-22T16:58Z 2383 followers, 4621 engagements

"This is meant to reassure everyone at least as far as I can tell the estate is doing everything possible to preserve the NOLs"
X Link @monotanus 2025-10-24T05:16Z 2385 followers, 1387 engagements