[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Daniel Litt posts on X about litt, productivity, op, agi the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence technology brands XXXXX% fashion brands XXXX% stocks XXXX% travel destinations XXXX%
Social topic influence litt #2, productivity 3.28%, op 3.28%, agi 1.64%, llm 1.64%, fin 1.64%, capabilities 1.64%, banana republic 1.64%, banana 1.64%, menswear XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @garymarcus @esyudkowsky @gpu_thief @aimelgibson @dimensionaitech @sport35561 @spiralizing @doodlestein @kashhill @grok @elliotglazer @taliaringer @heseynus @polynoamial @alexwei @climatepals @dzwickweber @dearmadisonblue @allodoxaa @yurisulyma
Top assets mentioned Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@doodlestein Well see. I agree it will likely be able to prove small interesting things soon (arguably Gemini and o3 etc. can already do this)" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 14:33:34 UTC 49.3K followers, 1279 engagements
"@GaryMarcus @kashhill Yes sometimes people with no history of psychotic episodes have them. While he did so he interacted with ChatGPT was taking ketamine() etc. This is not good reasoning" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 19:29:29 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"๐ looks like theres a huge amount of evidence for my conjecture that all numbers are less than 10100" @littmath on X 2025-07-13 17:06:16 UTC 49.4K followers, 247K engagements
"People are making fun of Gary for this but FWIW I think it should be applauded--it's a sign of intellectual honesty" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 17:28:56 UTC 49.4K followers, 38.9K engagements
"What are the obstructions to AI performing high-quality autonomous math research I dont claim to know for sure but I think they include many of the same obstructions that prevent it from doing many jobs:" @littmath on X 2025-07-20 17:37:46 UTC 49.4K followers, 3114 engagements
"@GaryMarcus @heseynus @AIMelGibson @polynoamial @alexwei_" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 14:18:56 UTC 49.4K followers, 17.4K engagements
"A tool that can solve hard math problems but also produces incorrect answers to problems it can't solve could end up being a net productivity sink--or even worse if it fools the user lead to incorrect claims" @littmath on X 2025-07-21 20:47:35 UTC 49.4K followers, 7007 engagements
"The reason well never build a true airplane: man cannot create something that can jump higher than himself. Its just natural hierarchy" @littmath on X 2025-07-11 20:44:37 UTC 49.3K followers, 53.5K engagements
"Quick comment on what I think it would mean if AI tools outperform human on some/all areas of math (not calling out Dylan who I think is asking a very reasonable question):" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 16:24:52 UTC 49.4K followers, 12.4K engagements
"I've recently noticed an uptick in crank papers in my area submitted to arXiv -- X out of X papers with "Hodge conjecture" in the title or abstract since June XX have been nonsense. I think almost all of these were written with LLM aid" @littmath on X 2025-07-21 20:47:37 UTC 49.4K followers, 5535 engagements
"One worry I have is that AI tools will develop their ability to produce hard-to-check convincing mathematical prose more rapidly than their ability to produce correct answers. If so I suspect we will soon see a deluge of persuasive-looking incorrect results" @littmath on X 2025-07-21 20:47:36 UTC 49.4K followers, 11K engagements
"I think the evidence for "ChatGPT-induced psychosis" interpreted literally is weak. Clearly there are people in the midst of a mental crisis who are interacting with ChatGPT in a concerning way. This is very different from the claim that it is inducing psychosis" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 19:05:39 UTC 49.4K followers, 70K engagements
"If these models did not submit a wrong answer to P6 I think that's a pretty bullish sign for the near-term future of AI-for-math. If they did. /fin" @littmath on X 2025-07-21 20:47:38 UTC 49.4K followers, 5833 engagements
"@dearmadisonblue Sure I even wrote its concerning in the OP" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 19:23:55 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"Reupping this market in case anyone wants to participate:" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 12:39:44 UTC 49.4K followers, 9726 engagements
"@Allodoxaa Theres a few threads and this GitHub repository:" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 13:53:38 UTC 49.3K followers, 1722 engagements
"We dont know much yet about how the best internal models work but I dont think its clear that getting capabilities of that level is only an engineering problem" @littmath on X 2025-07-20 17:44:47 UTC 49.4K followers, 4961 engagements
"@DiracDeltaFunk @analytichegel Yes they're here: They were indeed not graded by the same judges as humans" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 19:20:53 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"@GaryMarcus Yes I think the story is compatible with what I wrote. Obviously these are sad stories; the question is whether ChatGPT is increasing incidence of psychosis" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 19:18:42 UTC 49.3K followers, 1633 engagements
"Of course (auto)formalization will help to address this--but in my area any sort of formalization is I think pretty far away" @littmath on X 2025-07-21 20:47:37 UTC 49.4K followers, 6757 engagements
"@WhiteHouse I think its more that the person running this account is constitutionally incapable of posting anything other than cringe banana republic slop" @littmath on X 2025-07-12 19:21:17 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"To be clear there are now several examples of people in crisis interacting with LLMs in a way that I personally find very distressing. I find it much less obvious that ChatGPT is increasing or will increase the incidence of psychosis" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 19:46:00 UTC 49.4K followers, 4320 engagements
"@diagonalized_ @AudeIdScire Assuming you mean "the process of mathematical discovery" I don't see why there would be. I would still hope that there is space for humans to be employed to understand interesting mathematics but that's more a sociological question that I don't have a good answer for" @littmath on X 2025-07-21 13:38:24 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"An AI tool that gets gold on the IMO is obviously immensely impressive. Does it mean math is solved Is an AI-generated proof of the Riemann hypothesis clearly on the horizon Obviously not" @littmath on X 2025-07-20 17:37:45 UTC 49.4K followers, 57.7K engagements
"Giving a slide talk next weekthinking of trying something other than Beamer. Any recommendations for software for beautiful math talks" @littmath on X 2025-07-22 00:58:56 UTC 49.4K followers, 8952 engagements
"@TaliaRinger For example if I want to prove something a bit outside my field what is the first thing I should do Ask a colleague try myself ask ChatGPT" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 14:55:41 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"@ESYudkowsky Do you think it's likely that ChatGPT/other LLMs are increasing incidence of psychosis" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 20:17:55 UTC 49.3K followers, 1169 engagements
"@rulimanurung The question is if thats actually happeninghas the incidence of psychosis gone up visibly due to ChatGPT Thats a question we have very weak evidence on" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 19:36:42 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"One piece of info that seems important to me in terms of forecasting usefulness of new AI models for mathematics: did the gold-medal-winning models which did not solve IMO problem X submit incorrect answers for it ๐งต" @littmath on X 2025-07-21 20:47:34 UTC 49.4K followers, 127.7K engagements
"@GaryMarcus @kashhill I dont think that passage contains evidence that ChatGPT caused this persons psychosis. Obviously they had a conversation while he was in the midst of an episode" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 19:26:58 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"@olivertraldi angling to become the conservative menswear guy" @littmath on X 2025-07-21 13:32:44 UTC 49.4K followers, 1105 engagements
"@joolsd My question is whether it's increasing rates of psychosis. Certainly it could do so by acting primarily on people with a propensity towards psychosis; I think that could reasonably be called inducing psychosis" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 20:28:27 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"@krishnanrohit Curious how much you think "ChatGPT-induced psychosis" is actually ChatGPT inducing psychosis and how much of it is people already in the grips of psychosis exhibiting it through ChatGPT conversations. Like has there been an increase in the total amount of psychosis" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 18:56:29 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"I think you should read self-reports of how much AI tools increase productivity with a LOT of skepticism" @littmath on X 2025-07-10 17:34:40 UTC 49.3K followers, 38.6K engagements
"@GaryMarcus @kashhill What counterexamples We have examples of people in a mental health crisis interacting with ChatGPT which I mention in the OP. We have no evidence it caused that crisis" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 19:21:05 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"Why this is important: it is very hard/time-intensive to check correctness of English-language mathematical proofs. (See below for a thread on this topic.)" @littmath on X 2025-07-21 20:47:34 UTC 49.4K followers, 11.1K engagements
"@dzwick_weber Do you mean what effect do I think it will have on the profession No idea. That said Im not a professional theorem prover Im a professional math understander. Id be very excited about a tool that can prove theorems I cant" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 13:07:51 UTC 49.4K followers, 28.2K engagements
"@itaisher what definition of "AI tool" are you using here" @littmath on X 2025-07-17 15:34:23 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"@colin_fraser As I understand it the Google ones were graded by the official graders. I read a couple of each of the OpenAI/Google ones and they were correct" @littmath on X 2025-07-22 01:48:13 UTC 49.4K followers, 1552 engagements
"I feel like its kind of obvious which side youd rather err on" @littmath on X 2025-07-14 02:20:36 UTC 49.3K followers, 42.5K engagements
"@GaryMarcus Maybe you can show me the part of the story that convincingly shows ChatGPT caused instances of psychosis" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 19:25:42 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"it was a perfect summer day in Toronto. the sun was out; the subway station garbage bags danced upside-down in the wind" @littmath on X 2025-07-18 16:58:12 UTC 49.4K followers, 8514 engagements
"theyre going to automate you. AI will do your job. itll be better than you at everything. when you want to smell a flower itll smell for you better than you ever could. itll be the flower too" @littmath on X 2025-03-10 03:46:23 UTC 49.3K followers, 54.7K engagements
"@alpoge @nmca (More serious answer is that since I started taking Manifold semi-seriously i.e. in the last few weeks Ive been trading more on sentiment than ground truth.)" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 13:36:22 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"In the last month there have been at least X (nonsense) papers on the Hodge conjecture posted to arXiv that I am XX% sure are LLM-generated complete with hallucinated citations etc. Very obnoxious to pollute the commons this way" @littmath on X 2025-07-17 20:15:36 UTC 49.4K followers, 60.5K engagements
"@chenson_ It's clearly not a benefit for usefulness of the tool to have no Lean formalization. I think the fact that the tool is submitting (apparently) only correct solutions without some kind of formalization is impressive nonetheless" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 18:32:11 UTC 49.3K followers, XXX engagements
"Huge congrats to OpenAI for their IMO gold. I dont find it too surprising that an AI tool was able to achieve this (see below though Id sort of lost hope the last few days) but Im pretty surprised it was an LRM with no tool use etc" @littmath on X 2025-07-19 12:05:03 UTC 49.4K followers, 111.3K engagements