[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@jsm2334 Avatar @jsm2334 Prof Jeffrey S Morris

Prof Jeffrey S Morris posts on X about to the, scott, if you, at least the most. They currently have XXXXXXXXXXX followers and 1892 posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXXXXXXXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence countries finance stocks technology brands automotive brands

Social topic influence to the, scott #1090, if you, at least, france, the world, flu, accounting, strong, events in

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @stkirsch @msabouri @jikkyleaks @therealtruther @denisrancourt @thechiefnerd @dowdedward @retsefl @clarecraigpath @jesslovesmjk @rwmalonemd @draseemmalhotra @newstart2024 @gadboit @saltaovladimir @kevinnbass @allcaps33333 @ascotjohn @saladinkathy @jneill

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"@RetsefL Are you saying that a key criteria in how you vote and how ACIP crafts its recommendations is your worries about mandates that others might impose"
X Link 2025-12-06T19:52Z 14.5K followers, 3866 engagements

"@MarioNawfal Are they planning on publishing the scientific details of their analyses for doctors and scientists to evaluate or just report their claims through the media with no scientific justification"
X Link 2025-12-10T03:48Z 14.5K followers, 5309 engagements

"@liz_churchill10 How many would you expect to die in a given day if vaccines caused none of them"
X Link 2025-12-09T04:35Z 14.5K followers, 8019 engagements

"Jake Scott documents many studies that show how Aaron Siri is misrepresenting the literature on vaccines to imply no RCT were done and no substantive safety studies were done focusing on product inserts and narrow definitions rather than considering the complete scientific literature for which he ignores or dismisses vast literature that goes against his pre-determined conclusion"
X Link 2025-12-10T13:16Z 14.5K followers, 16.9K engagements

"@EndTribalism It showed no benefit over the standard flu shot for seniors it was not compared to active placebo. It showed substantial improvement over standard vaccines in 18-64yr olds"
X Link 2025-12-02T01:25Z 14.5K followers, 6059 engagements

"@WallStreetMav Is it that amazing time traveling Covid vaccines again going back in time XX years to cause a XX year trend"
X Link 2025-12-02T12:32Z 14.5K followers, 1356 engagements

"It provides no such proof I encourage you to read the underlying paper and look at its assumptions. The paper certainly does not show the PCR false positive rate was 86%. It is not even X% in actuality. The limitation of PCR is not specificity the false positive rate is very low. It is that PCR cannot distinguish between live virus in an activating infection or dead viral fragments from a recent but now resolved infection. The papers methods are invalid and it makes all kinds of false assumptions that lead to the numbers they (and you) falsely attribute to XX% false positive rate as I detail"
X Link 2025-12-03T12:27Z 14.5K followers, XXX engagements

"ACIP Leadership Shake-Up Before Hep B Vaccine Vote Alarms Experts"
X Link 2025-12-04T04:14Z 14.5K followers, 1023 engagements

"Also impossible that in that country vaccines killed millions or hundreds of thousands or the other completely implausible claims you and others have made Btw if you read the study they have results adjusted for their NCO analysis of lower magnitude and they also show massive and undeniable reduction of risk of Covid death during the COVID waves which along with showing implausibility of the ridiculous claims you and others have made that vaccines are drivers of excess deaths are the main take home message of the paper. Note the authors do not claim causal effects on all cause deaths as they"
X Link 2025-12-05T19:08Z 14.5K followers, XXX engagements

"You can see the factors they matched on and the supplement clearly shows the matching was successful in obtaining balance those factors Of course there are always unmeasured confounders that could produce residual confounding (which they at least tried to investigate by NCO analysis) But the key point remains that even accounting for potential residual confounding it is completely implausible that vaccines are drivers or major contributors of excess deaths and certainly did not kill millions. and you see the % reduction for covid deaths are way greater than other causes of deaths which"
X Link 2025-12-05T20:36Z 14.5K followers, XXX engagements

"I never said that the C19 vaccines provide that much long term benefit and neither did the authors I said that it shows his claims vaccines are primary drivers of excess deaths and that vaccines killed millions or hundreds of thousands are clearly implausible in France based on these data and I also pointed to the much stronger effects for Covid deaths that are much greater magnitude than the non Covid deaths so strong evidence of VE vs Covid deaths. Both are true and these data support that"
X Link 2025-12-05T22:09Z 14.5K followers, XXX engagements

"Steve is ignoring the actual conclusions made by the authors which are not only plausible but well supported by the paper and corroborating many other papers from all over the world. He is the one bringing up and irrelevant issue of the XX% all cause benefit that the authors acknowledge is not realistic to believe is causal so do not put in their conclusions he tries to act as though the authors made that their conclusion and thus to categorically dismiss the paper whose results including the ones the authors can conclude and are strongly supported by the analysis in the paper even"
X Link 2025-12-05T23:40Z 14.5K followers, XXX engagements

"@CNviolations Because mercury in fish is actually proven harmful Thimerisol in vaccines not"
X Link 2025-12-06T00:08Z 14.5K followers, 5438 engagements

"@AaronSiriSG Cherry pick and misrepresent for the choir"
X Link 2025-12-06T07:06Z 14.5K followers, 1876 engagements

"@PeterHegarty17 @stkirsch Can you post a link to the paper doing that analysis and/or lay out the specific modeling and assumptions that lead you to that conclusion Amd how much PFE do you expect in 18-59 France"
X Link 2025-12-06T15:12Z 14.5K followers, XX engagements

"@PeterHegarty17 @stkirsch Ive yet to see any analyses providing evidence that vaccines increased risk of death. Anywhere in the world"
X Link 2025-12-06T15:13Z 14.5K followers, XX engagements

"Why is the EM vaccine associated People treat EM as raw death data and it is not it is based on extrapolated presumed baseline and always have to be interpreted in light of that And also after a historically disruptive pandemic with novel virus that unlike vaccines has strong scientific evidence of serious and life threatening sequelae it is not scientifically valid to automatically attribute the estimated excess to vaccines. People who want to believe it is vaccines assume it is caused by vaccines unless proven otherwise but that is fallacious analytical reasoning"
X Link 2025-12-06T16:26Z 14.5K followers, XX engagements

"I dont think your statement is accurate at all especially since one of the primary reasons exposure probability is low is that so many are vaccinated and dissuading parents from vaccination will increase exposure risk to all Also measles is potential dangerous to any small child and there are not substantial documented risks of the vaccine to counter these benefits. Informed consent is good but the information needs to be a full picture and scientifically accurate other wise it is effectively disinformed discouragement"
X Link 2025-12-06T18:27Z 14.5K followers, XXX engagements

"Yes that is the sketchy secondary analysis that picked only a subset of events and assigned events to categories in nonsensical ways. You can find all kinds of scientific critiques pointing out the flaws and bias in that analysis (including from me) When you consider ALL serious adverse events in the trial there was no difference with both vaccine AND placebo arms having rates of about X in 175"
X Link 2025-12-08T04:37Z 14.5K followers, XX engagements

"Now I see why you are being so irrationally unhinged. You are angry about the strict mitigation used some places In the beginning it was a novel virus killing people and municipalities took strict mitigation measures to reduce spread and exposure After some weeks I wrote long term strict mitigation measures like universal closures and stay at home orders were not sustainable and unnecessary as scientific data revealed how the virus was spreading so that we could attain much of the reduced spread with more moderate mitigation that would also produce less collateral damage (and political"
X Link 2025-12-08T13:30Z 14.5K followers, XX engagements

"If there is a X in 1000 excess risk of some medical event after vaccination then it would show up clearly in post approval safety monitoring both a massive event specific safety signal in VAERs (even if analyzed in valid fashion) as well as clear signal in active monitoring systems like VSD. That would be a high magnitude effect and not difficult to detect in cohorts of millions"
X Link 2025-12-08T16:34Z 14.5K followers, XXX engagements

"@IanCopeland5 That is base rate fallacy"
X Link 2025-12-08T16:57Z 14.5K followers, 4515 engagements

"You need 40k in a study to detect a 2.2-fold increase (120% increase) in an event with baseline rate of 1/1k in the study reference population considerably more if you want to detect increases of less than 2-fold. Hoegs answer was on point. Not sure where Malone got his rule of thumb from but a study of 3k even if per arm is not nearly big enough to detect a difference in a 1/1k event unless he is talking about just likelihood of observing at least one event and not about finding a causal vaccine-placebo difference or if he is only interested in detecting an enormous difference like a 5-10"
X Link 2025-12-08T17:34Z 14.5K followers, 2463 engagements

"@DschlopesIsBack Nobody asked for data to be hidden for XX years"
X Link 2025-12-08T17:59Z 14.5K followers, XX engagements

"So you are equating covid vaccines to surgically implanted defibrillators when it comes to assessing appropriate target population What a terribly invalid equivalence And where do you get the idea that reducing risk of death was the primary endpoint of the vaccine trials or that nursing home patients were the target population The target population of this trials was all adults not the X% most frail and physically/mentally limited with shortest life expectancy as you seem to think for some reason And the primary endpoint was reducing risk of symptomatic disease. of course you should already"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:02Z 14.5K followers, XX engagements

"To consider what a RCT in this setting would look like youd need to specify efficacy and safety endpoints specify no long followed up for those endpoints and consider the background incidence of those endpoints after specifying those we could assess feasibility and any ethical considerations"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:12Z 14.5K followers, XXX engagements

"@CrazyMomERnurse @HighWireTalk My post is talking about post approval safety monitoring Katie"
X Link 2025-12-08T20:43Z 14.5K followers, XX engagements

"First what makes you think I have XX hours to devote to this And second I can tell you that given the number of topics in his gish gallop and all of the scientific literature in each of these areas (not just looking at package inserts) it would take a LOT more than XX hours to systematically review all of these areas to accurately convey the state of evidence on all of these topics. He and his army of researchers building these arguments have spent WAY more than XX hours in selectively assembling and organizing this evidence. Jake Scott has already done a post where he points out a dozen or"
X Link 2025-12-10T16:23Z 14.5K followers, XX engagements

"@viggotheca66331 And he presents it in a way to suggest there is virtually no safety data beyond the X days mentioned in the insert he cites Which is cherry picking and misleading to create an impression what lawyers do and yes it is parsing words"
X Link 2025-12-10T16:57Z 14.5K followers, XX engagements

"Right. I get it. You want to use the argument "science is corrupted" do summarily dismiss all of the scientific literature (or at least all of it that shows your claims are not true) then you can claim whatever you want is true without rigorous scientific evidence. I see it and fully understand that tactic. But that is not a valid way to handle suspected conflict. It is to critically evaluate the details of whatever paper you see -- and if you want to be more skeptical about papers coming from sources you propose are more biased Fine be more skeptical. But evaluate the scientific details and"
X Link 2025-12-10T22:07Z 14.5K followers, XX engagements

"No they didn't debate this before congress. Scott was brought on to provide a critical evaluation of the Ford study which he did very well and then Siri and Johnson and others descended on him with a bunch of questions unrelated to the Ford study. Siri makes his points carefully while creating a broader impression for reasonably followers suggesting no real safety studies were done for HepB vaccines in the decades they've been used -- to support his narrative and create a false impression without explicitly lying if you parse his words. Like Bill Clinton did"
X Link 2025-12-10T22:11Z 14.5K followers, XXX engagements