[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@ecutruin EcuEcu posts on X about generative, ai, art, 6969 the most. They currently have XXX followers and 6558 posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social topic influence generative #409, ai, art, 6969 #1387, render, if you, cat in #288, all i, what is, hosted
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @raen4657 @alicerovai @caldermoore @hausofriya @grok @shadmbrooks @jpalmiotti @isthisa3dmodel @jonlamart @dexerto @atomicdingo @cfryant @cutecorestar @delysidofficial @artedeingenio @tulpapilled @eldenfring @mi01548289 @baalthazarsalv1 @humblegrifter
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@explorer09_kc @SketchesbyBoze Wouldn't that just mean we should abolish copyright law altogether After all I could use generative AI to create something similar to any hand-drawn work as well. As copyright isn't about effort it seems to reason that we should just abolish the entire system"
X Link 2025-12-11T02:31Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@annabianca_illu @MichaelG_3D Theft is the act of depriving another of their property. Training AI on an artist's art does not deprive them of said art. If you are using the term theft to refer to infringement a US court ruled training AI is fair use"
X Link 2025-11-28T14:50Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@xaviercross1971 @Artedeingenio To create is to cause to exist. An AI artist causes their AI art to exist through the operation of generative software. Thus they are a creator of said work. You are anthropomorphizing what is essentially an advanced algorithmic fill tool. So your premise is flawed"
X Link 2025-12-03T16:09Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@SketchesbyBoze You are conflating creativity and effort. Creativity is simply the act of using one's imagination. Me prompting "a cat in a Santa hat" is creative by definition as the concept came from my imagination. Less effort was invested in the work's creation but art isn't about effort"
X Link 2025-12-10T23:43Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@IAMROLLES @Raen4657 @Kazi5isAlive Why can't it be both While you can produce works rather trivially using generative AI this does not mean the crafts are limited to such works. It is like how photography is not limited to trivially taken selfies. Why is this seemingly so difficult for you to grasp"
X Link 2025-12-11T01:08Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@explorer09_kc @SketchesbyBoze They only need to show a minimal creative spark according to Feist. So while having creative control is required you need not control every element of the resulting work to be considered its author"
X Link 2025-12-11T02:02Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@explorer09_kc @SketchesbyBoze Also software like Stable Diffusion is deterministic. The same inputs will produce the same output. The reason hosted solutions like Midjourney or Grok can provide seemingly nondeterministic results is because the software is providing some inputs on your behalf"
X Link 2025-12-11T02:03Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@explorer09_kc @SketchesbyBoze This would apply to all digital art now that generative AI exists. I explained this in my prior post. So why should AI art specifically be exempt simply because someone may produce a similar work If that is the basis of exemption it should apply to all digital art now"
X Link 2025-12-11T02:43Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@Jacob_sewing @SketchesbyBoze Just because I'm using generative software to render my expression doesn't mean I'm not creating. Your position is rather flawed. It really seems like you are just upset that drawing skills may become less valued due to generative AI and thus you are lashing out in frustration"
X Link 2025-12-11T02:54Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@explorer09_kc @SketchesbyBoze There certainly are and many are ending in favor of generative AI"
X Link 2025-12-11T02:55Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@overlord2654 @DESTROPOCALYPSE @Kazi5isAlive The entire purpose of a tool is to do work on your behalf. That's why we create tools in the first place. This whole idea that tools don't do work for you is absurd. Sure generative AI can do a lot of work on an AI artist's behalf. And That just makes it a rather useful tool"
X Link 2025-12-11T03:17Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@overlord2654 @DESTROPOCALYPSE @Kazi5isAlive Nobody creates something truly unique. As artists we recombine concepts we've learned and generalized through our experiences. That is how we create novel works. While the exact mechanisms may differ this is what generative AI is also doing. So you're simply incorrect"
X Link 2025-12-11T03:18Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@overlord2654 @DESTROPOCALYPSE @Kazi5isAlive And I can do the same with generative AI. The entire point of this technology is to allow novel works to be produced. Have you actually done any research into how it works or are you just basing your entire opinion on what others opposed to these tools have claimed"
X Link 2025-12-11T03:28Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@IAMROLLES @Raen4657 @Kazi5isAlive No it is not the artist. The software is not an individual expressing itself. It is a tool that is operated in order to render a particular result. It is the individual operating said software that is expressing their imagination. Thus they are the one that is creating art"
X Link 2025-12-11T03:55Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@IAMROLLES @Raen4657 @Kazi5isAlive A director is an artist despite directing others to perform tasks in order to create their art. They are often even considered the primary creator of said work. That said the generative software is not an individual making its own creative decisions. It is a tool we operate"
X Link 2025-12-11T04:10Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@DESTROPOCALYPSE @Kazi5isAlive @Raen4657 Art is the expression of one's imagination. Even me prompting "a cat in a Santa hat" involves making a concept from my imagination known. Thus the result is art by definition. I'm simply using different tools to render said expression when compared to someone that draws. So"
X Link 2025-12-11T18:28Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@explorer09_kc @SketchesbyBoze No. I've already explained that generative software like Stable Diffusion is deterministic. As long as the same exact inputs are provided the same result will be produced. Random number generators themselves are deterministic as they are just math formulas"
X Link 2025-12-11T18:36Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@Ganta_Igarashi_ @Kazi5isAlive @IAMROLLES @Raen4657 Seems this discussion is pointless. I'll mute you and move on"
X Link 2025-12-11T18:53Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@IAMROLLES @Raen4657 @Kazi5isAlive If all you do is lash out you're not going to convince us of your position. It will really only serve to undermine any argument you make. So if you can't respond with rational arguments for your position perhaps you simply should not respond at all"
X Link 2025-12-11T19:11Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@Raen4657 @IAMROLLES @Kazi5isAlive Have you looked into this"
X Link 2025-12-11T19:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements