[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@bitcoinoptech Avatar @bitcoinoptech Bitcoin Optech

Bitcoin Optech posts on X about bitcoin, stack exchange, stack, compact the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: X #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #


Social category influence cryptocurrencies social networks finance celebrities musicians

Social topic influence bitcoin, stack exchange #4, stack #1614, compact #954, contracts, madonna, locks, ln, instead of, utxo

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @bitschmidty @murchandamus @glozow @theinstagibbs @peterktodd @darosior @ajtowns @hrdng @roasbeef @n1ckler @jesseposner @pwuille @realtbast @rot13maxi @renepickhardt @stevenroose3 @matthewzipkin @dergoegge @remyers @fjahr

Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC)

Top Social Posts #


Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Discussion continued around the proposal for full node peers to occasionally send each other their current template for the next block using compact block relay encoding"
X Link @bitcoinoptech 2025-10-17T11:25Z 17.9K followers, XXX engagements

"Francesco Madonna (@CiccioMadonna) posted to Delving Bitcoin about a concept which is a covenant-less vault model using taproot OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY and OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY"
X Link @bitcoinoptech 2025-10-17T11:25Z 17.9K followers, 1070 engagements

"Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #369 is here: - shares an update on differential fuzzing of Bitcoin and LN implementations - links to a new paper about garbled locks for accountable computing contracts - summarizes popular Q&A from Stack Exchange - Optech Newsletter #369 Podcast"
X Link @bitcoinoptech 2025-08-29T11:02Z 17.9K followers, 2915 engagements

"Bitcoin Optech newsletter #376 is here: - shares an update on the proposal for nodes to share their current block template - summarizes a paper outlining a covenant-less vault construction - Bitcoin Core XXXX release - Optech Newsletter #376 Podcast"
X Link @bitcoinoptech 2025-10-17T11:25Z 17.9K followers, 1446 engagements

"Bruno Garcia (@brrrunog) and Liam Eagen (@liameagen) joined Optech to discussNewsletter #369: News 24:56 Update on differential fuzzing of Bitcoin and LN implementations 0:58 Garbled locks for accountable computing contracts Selected Q&A from Bitcoin Stack Exchange 39:45 Is it possible to recover a private key from an aggregate public key under strong assumptions 41:24 Are all taproot addresses vulnerable to quantum computing 45:20 Why cant we set the chainstate obfuscation key 52:09 Is it possible to revoke a spending branch after a block height 53:45 Configure Bitcoin Core to use onion"
X Link @bitcoinoptech 2025-09-02T20:19Z 17.9K followers, 2077 engagements

"Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #373 is here: - summarizes a vulnerability affecting old versions of Eclair - summarizes research into full node feerate settings - summarizes popular Q&A from Stack Exchange - Optech Newsletter #373 Podcast"
X Link @bitcoinoptech 2025-09-26T10:26Z 17.9K followers, 3017 engagements

"Daniela Brozzoni (@danielabrozzoni) posted to Delving Bitcoin the results of a scan of almost 30000 full nodes that were accepting incoming connections"
X Link @bitcoinoptech 2025-09-26T10:26Z 17.9K followers, XXX engagements

"Selected Q&A from Bitcoin Stack Exchange: - Implications of OP_RETURN changes in upcoming Bitcoin Core version XXXX - If OP_RETURN relay limits are ineffective why remove the safeguard instead of keeping it as a default discouragement - What are the worst-case stress scenarios from uncapped OP_RETURNs in Bitcoin Core v30 - If OP_RETURN needed more room why was the 80-byte cap removed instead of being raised to XXX - If arbitrary data is inevitable does removing OP_RETURN limits shift demand toward more harmful storage methods (like UTXO-inflating addresses) - If OP_RETURN uncapping doesnt"
X Link @bitcoinoptech 2025-09-26T10:26Z 17.9K followers, 2727 engagements

"Matt Morehouse Daniela Brozzoni (@danielabrozzoni) and Gustavo Flores Echaiz (@gustavojfe) joined Optech to discuss Newsletter #373: News 18:50 Eclair vulnerability 0:35 Research into feerate settings Selected Q&A from Bitcoin Stack Exchange 28:27 Implications of OP_RETURN changes in upcoming Bitcoin Core version XXXX 42:12 If OP_RETURN relay limits are ineffective why remove the safeguard instead of keeping it as a default discouragement 43:25 What are the worst-case stress scenarios from uncapped OP_RETURNs in Bitcoin Core v30 50:39 If OP_RETURN needed more room why was the 80-byte cap"
X Link @bitcoinoptech 2025-10-01T17:39Z 17.9K followers, 12.2K engagements

"Sindura Saraswathi (@btcsindura) ZmnSCPxj and Eugene Siegel joined Optech to discuss Newsletter #375: News 1:56 Optimal Threshold Signatures 14:33 Flattening certain nested threshold signatures 38:14 Theoretical limitations on embedding data in the UTXO set Bitcoin Core PR Review Club 27:12 Compact block harness Releases and release candidates 45:01 Bitcoin Inquisition XXXX Notable code and documentation changes 47:16 Bitcoin Core #33453 51:52 Bitcoin Core #33504 53:55 Core Lightning #8563 56:55 Core Lightning #8523 58:22 Core Lightning #8398 59:47 LDK #4120 1:01:35 LND #10254"
X Link @bitcoinoptech 2025-10-17T14:30Z 17.9K followers, 1353 engagements