@Sai_s_destiny Sai s Destiny

Sai s Destiny posts on X about $ionq, in the, ai, money the most. They currently have [--] followers and [--] posts still getting attention that total [---] engagements in the last [--] hours.

Engagements: [---] #

• [--] Week [-----] +173%
• [--] Month [-----] +718%
• [--] Months [------] +1,640%
• [--] Year [------] +30,569%

Mentions: [--] #

• [--] Months [--] +380%
• [--] Year [--] +2,800%

Followers: [--] #

• [--] Week [--] +9.70%
• [--] Month [--] +26%
• [--] Months [--] +209%

CreatorRank: [---------] #

Social Influence

Social category influence finance stocks technology brands celebrities gaming countries

Social topic influence $ionq, in the, ai, money, $rgti, agi, ibm, quantum computing, market cap, $googl

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @genejchan @commonsenseplay @catstates @spacinfleqtion @jrouldz @drsingularity @argarga @munoismuno @niccolodemasi @capellaspace @ionqinc @chb1284 @vastcnc @grok @arg_arg_a @cinecrew @techinnovationz @jakofalltr82613 @sage28384 @pennycheck

Top assets mentioned IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) Rigetti Computing, Inc. Common Stock (RGTI) IBM (IBM) Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL) Prime Medicine, Inc. (PRME) Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD) Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"@FiddleyF @deepresearch855 If you look close at their announcement youll notice that they said optimized 2qubits gate fidelity exceeds 99.9% - not the raw native 2qubits fidelity. Might care for them to go deep into explaining what Optimized means"
X Link 2024-09-17T00:49Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@genejchan Seems like misinformation here - IonQ Forte Enterprise never achieved 99.96% 2Q gate fidelity. More like 99.6%. The 99.96% shown by Oxford Ionics was achieved on a system with [--] qubits(99.97% to be exact)"
X Link 2025-06-16T21:58Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@plasticnewt3 IonQ did the right thing. It gets paid off when it acquires Oxford Ionics. Theres no guarantee of success if IonQ puts most resources to research like right now laser systems could to be a dead end. Chris Monroe and shareholders do not share the exact same interest"
X Link 2025-06-19T23:30Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@tenet_research How so"
X Link 2025-06-25T11:15Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@cinecrew Futurum Group seems to do a lot of hyping through social media. Makes sense not to announce it. Actually aligns with our interest as we want acquisition of OI to dilute as little as possible. De Masi probably got money for himself here but I dont mind"
X Link 2025-08-08T02:16Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@TechInnovationz Even ChatGPT [--] finds it hard to agree on"
X Link 2025-08-14T23:19Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@007ofWallSt @pau_100X @IonQ_Inc Bullshit. When you bet on a company like IonQ you bet with your life. You bet against market consensus. Zero is your exit. Hows your luck so far riding along the market forces you perceive @pau_100X is teaching you something here and you heard nothing"
X Link 2025-09-08T08:13Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@jakofalltr82613 @sage28384 @CHB1284 Anyone pushing forward frontier of human technology deserves more than $350m. We are from different stand points. Good luck businessman"
X Link 2025-09-09T04:43Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@TheTradeWizard_ He had said ignorant shit two days ago like Oxford Ionics founders will immediately dump all shares they acquired to market. Hes so stupid& short sighted that he doesnt understand any concepts outside of money. He doesnt know anything about lock-up period and vesting either"
X Link 2025-09-19T12:36Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@pennycheck @AnalystQuantum Wheres this light years ahead coming from I agree Infleqtion is legit but"
X Link 2025-09-21T03:48Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@SPAC_unicorn Anything you want to try hybrid you kinda need to partner with NVDA"
X Link 2025-09-22T22:53Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@burgundonfero @CHB1284 @wiskid009 @JeenyusONE Currently neutral atoms cannot do mid-computation entanglement of remote qubits yet. You can only do pre-computation all-to-all. Mid-circuit all-to-all allows you to dramatically reduce error correction overhead through different coding schemes"
X Link 2025-09-24T20:46Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Gbear831 Winner will very likely be between ion traps and neutral atoms. IBM went down the wrong path unfortunately. Benchmarks have always reported Quantinuum H2 as the best by Quantum Volume. IBM just has to keep its superconducting story up until it cannot"
X Link 2025-09-26T22:57Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@jrouldz @shinjox2790 Honestly its a shame to compare with IBM. Superconductings over. Nvidia knew better to have invested in every modality but superconducting. I hope IonQs brave enough to face the real competition"
X Link 2025-09-28T13:13Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@RklbsFan @StockMarketNerd Its working already if you track the industry closely. Quantinuum outperformed supercomputers in Max Cut optimization problem for some dense cases earlier this year. Push will be enormous in fields where optimization and simulation matters. Forget about RSA cracking"
X Link 2025-09-28T21:46Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@RealTimShady42 Infleqtion is legit. Neutral atoms modality had a late start but is catching up fast on fidelity. Infleqtion also has quantum sensing products selling already. CTO is founder. This is good. Pat Tang(Ex-VP R&D of IonQ) went over there in charge of engineering recently"
X Link 2025-10-03T21:40Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@commonsenseplay You are misinformed. Technologies are copied quickly within the same modality. If you own IonQ and say Infleqtion you own the near term commercial quantum advantages. Nvidia bought Quantinuum because it doesnt want to pay for IonQs whole stack and ecosystem"
X Link 2025-10-04T09:47Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@paullecoque @jrouldz Good metaphor. Another way I see it the industry is big enough to keep mediocre ppl on the payroll. Most of time these are the naysayers. True talents such as Chris Ballance was actually willing to put himself on the line(agrees to lock up his IonQ shares for 5+ years)"
X Link 2025-10-07T03:18Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@genejchan @MarkHubbard33 Neutral atoms is advancing very fast. Way ahead of $RGTI. They can now run thousands of qubits on a single module. On-chip QCCD can do a few hundreds at most on an ion trap module. Fidelity is lagging. It is an intense race now against ion trap. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20660 https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20660"
X Link 2025-10-10T08:47Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@MtnYardSale @SPAC_Infleqtion How tf does Heights pump and dump now that they bought at $92 a share🤣"
X Link 2025-10-11T22:38Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@machoman3314 @JamesA2972 @VASTCNC @SPAC_Infleqtion @ericjackson When it merges with Infleqtion it will be $4B according to agreement adjusted for current $CCCX trading price. This is how SPACs work"
X Link 2025-10-12T09:45Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@machoman3314 @JamesA2972 @VASTCNC @SPAC_Infleqtion @ericjackson I guess thats what it says. I just ignore that coz 99.9% chance the mergers happening"
X Link 2025-10-12T11:44Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@genejchan General population would assume Google/IBM are leading because they cant be wrong right They want maximal leverage so they go for RGTI - the only pure play that leverages on future Goog/IBM success. Theyll find out eventually they got scammed"
X Link 2025-10-13T20:40Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@genejchan To be fair RGTIs engineers and IPs would be worthwhile if superconducting shows promise. At least there would be a buyout price. Its just that it could never work being behind on nearly all fronts - fidelity qubits connectivity and module scalability"
X Link 2025-10-14T03:43Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@jakofalltr82613 @sage28384 @CHB1284 Hes dead wrong. Merge with OIs not even happening without hype. IonQ wouldve been stuck with Monroes clumsy laser lenses for ages. A coward and an arrogant person at the same time"
X Link 2025-09-08T22:48Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@TallGuyDiary @cinecrew It cannot be marginal. It is at least capable of running deep circuits of 4k+ gates while Forte Enterprise can only run like 1k gates"
X Link 2025-10-03T22:13Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Stefano47271344 @marcoiab I am in the market long enough to remember Archegos Capital which kept accumulating shares in Discovery and $VIAC from different brokers to corner the shorts. Got margin called because he used too much leverage. Otherwise shorts could get destroyed"
X Link 2025-10-09T19:34Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@removethenoise @DrocDolf Great find Good to see IPs are openly traded literatures open in the field. Infleqtion last week just announced partnership with Silicon Light Machines to develop PIC. With atoms reloading mid-circuit reconfig and PIC development strong tailwind for neutral atoms"
X Link 2025-10-13T12:39Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@QuantumDom The deal is puzzling. They would easily raise $2B(10% dilution) even if they just pre-announce it and dump it right on open market in one day. Even if the SP comes down 5-10% would still be a much better deal. Someone enlighten me. I hope they are moral people but wtf"
X Link 2025-10-19T06:06Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@SPVLABS @genejchan Its exactly the advantage of IonQ to abandon Tempo lineage. IBM/GOOG would have way more legacy/bureaucracy shit abandoning their models"
X Link 2025-10-21T21:54Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Zyphullen @Dr_Singularity This just sounds very dumb broyou are currently bottlenecked/confined by 3-D space and you dont even feel it The quantum entanglement effect is a sign of higher dimension. How else do you expect them to entangle if 3-D space is all that there is"
X Link 2025-11-02T00:08Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@BullMeechum3 @jrouldz @IonQ_Inc What do you mean supersede. HARQ is dumb. Like worrying about how I could best safeguard my $10B wealth once I obtain it. Photonic link itself is the $10B question"
X Link 2025-11-07T02:22Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@DravenEric94535 @commonsenseplay Whats fidelity of those Error Corrected Logical Qubits"
X Link 2025-11-07T03:17Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@DravenEric94535 @commonsenseplay 99.99% is SPAM not 2Q fidelity my friend. Huge difference"
X Link 2025-11-07T03:56Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"Based on latest development in the field of quantum computing. I try to re-evaluate the latest fair price for $IonQ- -Pro forma cash of $3.5B -IonQ latest breakthrough with smooth gate. -DARPA stage B announcement. -Quantinuum announcement of Helios"
X Link 2025-11-07T06:20Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"Future(7-8 years) dominant quantum player would be worth(unadjusted for inflation) - Niche utility case(65%): $0.1T Crypto relevant(30%): $1T AGI reliant(5%): $3.5T Median case: $0.54T Said player has at least 50% chance from ion trap camp(leading fidelity DARPA validation)"
X Link 2025-11-07T06:31Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@BullMeechum3 @jrouldz @IonQ_Inc Fair enough its not death sentence yet. Well see"
X Link 2025-11-07T12:10Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@u27395718103749 @MarvenzzFranc @genejchan Yes they all have shortcomings but out of all factors fidelity would be dominantly important. Superconducting need 3x3=9 qubits to somewhat error correct one logic qubit. Ion trap at 2:1 does a better job. This difference in engineering difficulty cannot be compensated"
X Link 2025-11-08T21:00Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@DesFrontierTech This is a response to Quantinuum which claims [--] error corrected logical qubits in the Helios system. 2:1 error correction budget for physical qubits fidelity of [------]. Quantinuum call these error corrected logical qubits. Good luck with their magic"
X Link 2025-11-21T05:35Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@GeneInvesting $15M Need to hit it big on one of the frontier technologies that I bet on. The wait is painful once I was past the research/accumulation stages"
X Link 2025-11-24T03:18Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@TheTakePolitics @FT Enabling generic inference quantum would one day become indispensable in AGI. This alone would justify $1T+ market cap"
X Link 2025-11-24T11:31Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Dr_Singularity @Grok Is gene edit urgently needed to make use of these anti-ageing interventions Paper: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.28.530532v4 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.28.530532v4"
X Link 2025-11-25T12:44Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@grok @Dr_Singularity @Grok Like what proportion of them would probably need gene editing"
X Link 2025-11-25T12:47Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@davidpattersonx Pointless. We cant defy law of physics character in Minecraft cant jump out of screen there is ceiling on technology. Nobody disagree. Have you got anything to add Singularity is the moment machines capable of self-improving. Has nothing to do with yr graph. Not there yet"
X Link 2025-11-26T09:12Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Cat_States @avgvalueinvest Rima keeping her shares would be admitting - the companys great I suck. I had to sell too if I were her"
X Link 2025-11-29T03:04Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Chris76985971 @Cat_States @avgvalueinvest Not gonna argue that people were selling along the way. But only those who were fired had sold their entirety. Ballance is not selling. de Masi promised no more selling(than the shares he acquired through the SPAC deal). In whose hands shall we trust"
X Link 2025-11-29T06:25Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@commonsenseplay @DesFrontierTech Those were not lies. Yourself told lies like I concentrate my short position like Druckenmiller while a few months ago when IonQ was up My short positions consist 5% of my portfolio. My average cost of short is $66.48 while you were actually shorting IonQ since $20"
X Link 2025-11-30T03:30Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@MaxLam80598490 @genejchan IonQs benchmark utility-related algorithms are actually the best(PE QFT Monte Carlo etc.). You think Google & IBM want to give a fuck Investors deserve to lose money if they dont research and end up buying RGTI"
X Link 2025-12-03T21:37Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@elonmusk @CathieDWood @Grok if this is the case what companies can I buy to capture the opportunity Like what solar panel company"
X Link 2025-12-07T22:55Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@commonsenseplay Just remember you said you stake your career on $IONQ going sub-$10 by end of Jan [----]. [--] days away. I hope you would hope yourself accountable now that you always try to hold others accountable"
X Link 2025-12-10T04:30Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@ShawnKwon11 @pennycheck Its obviously AI generated argument"
X Link 2025-12-26T04:32Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@DaveShapi Need quantum computing for subroutines of explorationary nature"
X Link 2025-12-30T00:32Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Jimdostocks @genejchan So Halleys Comet visit first"
X Link 2026-01-02T23:40Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@sciencegirl Anyone can prove that thered be no blank left for the bounded area after infinitely many loops"
X Link 2026-01-07T06:38Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@LordHodler Wtf Real upside has never happened to this stock since IPO"
X Link 2026-01-07T20:35Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@guo_lin99725 Error erasure😂😂 You need actual fidelity to do real work man. Youd be sitting there detect+erasing all day till [----] running a decryption circuit. Fyi: Quantinuum Helios can error detect for [--] qubits with [--] qubits overhead. These sidekicks will never be the holy grail"
X Link 2026-01-08T23:28Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@TacticzH @meeijer Absolutely perfect execution for the next [--] years would see a quantum pure play worth $17B - something like DocuSign. You dont know anything about science and technology. Learn to shut up on stuff you dont know about is a good start"
X Link 2026-01-10T14:30Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@TechInnovationz Good to see someones doing the job to dismantle boasters who love random samplings"
X Link 2026-01-12T21:21Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@OpLowcountry @commonsenseplay Ive been short $RGTI since it was in the high $50s (ATH of $58.15 in October) and added the whole way down.-CSI No one minds an objective voice. Problem is he lied all this fking time. If uve been following long enough ud know hes in red overall"
X Link 2026-01-17T06:32Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@commonsenseplay Like how the f would you be in green if ud been shorting already like u stake your career on $IONQ to go sub-$20 by Jan in August [----] Now all of a sudden you picked the top of $RGTI right there Stop lying. Stop playing Mentor/God"
X Link 2026-01-17T06:45Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@commonsenseplay Informed guess: your average short cost basis for $IONQ is around $25"
X Link 2026-01-17T06:50Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@JCann777 @MarvenzzFranc Grounded target in two years. Only need market cap to reach $250-300B. Something like Wells Fargo"
X Link 2026-01-17T22:42Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@netcreat OI structure likely still need optics for SPAM etc"
X Link 2026-01-18T11:09Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Rainmaker1973 Did I hear Microsoft Windows towards the end I am sure as hell we didnt have that back in [----]. Old enough to remember"
X Link 2026-01-18T21:01Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@Cat_States Modality here obviously means approach ie. government funded vs. market capitalism. My god"
X Link 2026-01-20T19:37Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@commonsenseplay Dont worry when $IONQ goes up your quantum short position would automatically shrink to 5%"
X Link 2026-01-20T19:44Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@j_p_jacques I doubt they hold any cryptos. Its their lazy approach - much like the market in general"
X Link 2026-01-24T22:33Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@SPAC_Infleqtion You should look at how furious $SKYT shareholders are. They all think its a steal no ones happy about it"
X Link 2026-01-26T19:09Z [--] followers, [----] engagements

"@Cat_States @genejchan Theres no match Doc. Quantinuum Helios shows 2:1 error correction through coding concatenation. Google Willow needs 3x3 lattice to start error correct ing a qubit. The race is officially over. SCs naturally handicapped by rigid connectivity and imperfect qubits"
X Link 2025-11-08T00:31Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@YsexPsnm Crowdstrike is worth $117B. $BTQ is currently worth $0.7B"
X Link 2026-01-08T22:03Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@HannaSuds 👍👍 IonQ and Prime Medicine the two technology platforms that would have the ultimate impact on human civilization. All others are paled by the implications of true AGI and anti-ageing gene edit"
X Link 2026-01-22T19:28Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Cat_States You like to talk before you think or research. Very bad habit. SkyWater is deeply connected to Infineon Oxford Ionics electronic chip manufacturer. It bought Infineons Austin operation last year. Its not a hedging strategy. IonQs speeding up its manufacturing progress"
X Link 2026-01-26T12:00Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Sensei0701 Short squeeze will be biblical"
X Link 2026-01-28T04:53Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@D27357 @crux_capital_ @VASTCNC Dive deep youll know. VA has technology in optical atomic clocks which is vitally important for quantum networks(synchronisation). Quantum networking is again vitally important for quantum computing systems to scale. Quantum network is also backbone of QKD"
X Link 2026-01-28T20:38Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@vicin888 @YsexPsnm I cant. My coherence is legit fucked by the ever dropping share price"
X Link 2026-01-29T22:24Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@techinvestoor @Allan_Reine @davidrliu You mean after the favourable possible outcome where PERT gets patented and actually falls under $PRME right"
X Link 2026-01-29T22:35Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Cat_States @genejchan Hows the logic qubits of Infleqtion or Quantinuum helping here"
X Link 2026-02-01T10:56Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@ConstantPatienc @Dr_Singularity AI will. We will not"
X Link 2026-02-05T02:31Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@ARG_ARG_A @munoismuno @NiccoloDeMasi @capellaspace Capella Space was a brilliant acquisition to use as a test bed for Vector Atomics quantum sensing technology. Elon Musk s vision of next chapter space economy will not be viable without Quantum Sensing"
X Link 2026-02-09T20:16Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@ARG_ARG_A @munoismuno @NiccoloDeMasi @capellaspace Capella Space was cheap enough as kind of a distress asset while Vector Atomic was state-of-the-art excellent choices for the Test bed for Quantum Sensing strategy"
X Link 2026-02-09T20:29Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@ARG_ARG_A @munoismuno @NiccoloDeMasi @capellaspace 4x revenue(of 2024) was what IonQ paid to buy out CS. This was cheap for control-takeover deals. CS investors likely losed money. CS de-orbited [--] out of [--] satellites in the past. Its SAR tech was being caught up by Umbra etc. Likely wanted exit due to cash burn"
X Link 2026-02-09T20:44Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@SPAC_Infleqtion Elon Musks space economy/moon city vision will not be possible without quantum sensing technology. Moon city alone will totally rely on GPS-free quantum navigation and quantum subsurface mapping. This alone will see Infleqtion 10X from here"
X Link 2026-02-10T03:59Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Cat_States My conjecture is ETFs. Average Joe just buy quantum ETFs with equal weight policy. It took $3M from investor and buy $1M of each company. $IonQ moves least because of large market cap & volume. $RGTI benefited from this before it proved itself to be rubbish to even plain eyes"
X Link 2026-02-10T21:22Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@Sir_Kory No. AI progress comes from uncovering hidden structure within data something quantum computing is born to do. Quantum will finally provide robust logic - the missing piece in the puzzle of AGI. This is not the investment opportunity of the decade. This comes once a millennium"
X Link 2026-02-11T07:20Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@AT_trailwill @commonsenseplay You are young in this market. Massive QE post-subprime caused no inflation. Japan YCC barely caused any inflation despite massive yen drop. ECB QE did not cause inflation. AI deflation is Force Majeure like Covid just permanent instead of transient"
X Link 2026-02-13T09:09Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@PonziMarkets $PACB will be obsolete soon. Oxford Nanopore offers much more efficient long read"
X Link 2026-01-30T00:40Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@ARG_ARG_A @munoismuno @NiccoloDeMasi @capellaspace I have $PRME. I wanted to diversify a bit in the quantum sector but $IonQ did that for me so. LOL"
X Link 2026-02-09T20:47Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@TaviCosta Like. energy metal and commodities under owned Wtf"
X Link 2026-02-15T21:05Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@tonitrades_ @leshka_eth The edge is in TLT trade. You have a great edge over Fed and sovereign/super fund managers who are obliged to use Feds predictions as guidelines. Fed still predicting unemployment rate steadily falling to 4.1% in [----]. Peak conflict of interest trying to preserve itself"
X Link 2026-02-15T22:11Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@JKeynesAlpha You will regret. Quantum hardware is one of the few remaining moats in the AI era when AI exceeds us in every aspects. At least you got the other moat right though. $PRME"
X Link 2026-02-16T09:34Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@ConvexDispatch This year would be last straw on 2025s camel back - starting with SaaS crash to force first bout of the unemployment tsunami. When you get a timing trigger in a conviction trading opportunity you retire your bloodline if you are brave enough to get it in with LEAPs"
X Link 2026-02-16T00:11Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@pascal_bornet In a few months time Google would know they trusted the wrong guy Hartmut Neven. Watch"
X Link 2026-02-17T08:12Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"Based on latest development in the field of quantum computing. I try to re-evaluate the latest fair price for $IonQ- -Pro forma cash of $3.5B -IonQ latest breakthrough with smooth gate. -DARPA stage B announcement. -Quantinuum announcement of Helios"
X Link 2025-11-07T06:20Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"IonQ and Quantinuum each has 50% chance being said player if ion trap wins out - Quantinuum is currently leading with Helios but IonQ have big potential with ECC and smooth gate). Loser would still be worth $0.1T if modality wins out. IonQ EV = $0.54x0.25 + $0.1x0.25 = $0.16T"
X Link 2025-11-07T06:39Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"This is 8x from current level. Account for future warrant dilution fair price is estimated to be $57x5 = $275. This is very conservative estimate by assuming IonQ to be worthless if modality does not dominate. In reality IonQ would still stay in quantum eco-system"
X Link 2025-11-07T06:47Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing